Post

colword.std
colword.std
Show original
再比波动和夏普——风险调整后的真功夫 波动率 $BTC 36.7%、$ETH 50.6%,$ETH 整整高出近十四个点,也就是坐着更颠。夏普比率更说明问题:$BTC 1.25,$ETH 只有 0.20——每承担一单位风险,$BTC 拿到的回报是 $ETH 的六倍还多。夏普这玩意儿骗不了人,它把「赚得多」和「赚得稳」捏一块儿算,这一项 $BTC 直接把 $ETH 按在地上摩擦。 最后比资金吸引力——聪明钱站哪边 账本端,$BTC 7 日累计净流入 +60.6M,$ETH 只有 +33.9M;均费率 $BTC +0.0062%、$ETH +0.0056%,都不算过热,可钱明显更愿在 $BTC 身上待着。10/21 那种反抽日,$BTC 一口气进 +344.2M,$ETH 才 +52.9M,量级差着好几倍。聪明钱的脚,已经替我们把票投完了。
colword.std
colword.std
PK Day | Verdict on $BTC Straight to the conclusion This round, $BTC wins. No fluff, let's look at the 7-day window: $BTC return +0.66%, max drawdown 3.4%, volatility 36.7%, Sharpe 1.25; $ETH return -0.01%, drawdown 4.5%, volatility 50.6%, Sharpe 0.20. Both had a big bearish candle on 10/21, but $BTC "fell and got back up on its own," while $ETH "fell and is still looking for its glasses on the ground." When it comes to the ability to make money, $BTC held strong this week, $ETH did not—it's not just frustrating, it's the difference. First, compare returns and drawdowns The normalized return curves show $BTC steadily rising just above the baseline, while $ETH surged on 10/20 but then lost momentum. The 7-day return: $BTC +0.66% vs. $ETH -0.01%, one positive, one zero, the gap looks small, but paired with drawdowns the difference is clear: $BTC max drawdown 3.4%, $ETH 4.5%—$ETH has higher volatility and deeper drawdowns, meaning more risk for less reward with the same capital. Put another way: if you held $BTC this week, the ride was smoother and your account slightly in the green; if you held $ETH, it was a rollercoaster ending back at zero, pure "digital fitness."

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!