
#StarkWareQuantumBTC
About StarkWareQuantumBTC
StarkWare said it completed the first quantum-secure Bitcoin mainnet transaction experiment, moving 10K sats into storage with added protection. Future quantum computers could break Bitcoin's current signatures; this approach adds a hash-based backup lock for specific funds without changing the protocol. It does not make Bitcoin quantum-safe. Each use takes hours, costs ~$150-$200 and needs miner coordination. Can it become practical for wallets and custodians?
Populär
Senaste
StarkWareQuantumBTC Populära inlägg
⚡️ $BTC is getting a post-quantum security upgrade without changing the base layer.
StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy reportedly locked $BTC on mainnet using a quantum-resistant storage scheme, with the transaction confirmed in block 964,199 and requiring no Bitcoin fork.
The bigger thesis: $BTC can potentially gain quantum resilience at the application layer while preserving the existing protocol consensus.
Quantum threat meets cryptographic innovation.
$BTC $ETH #WalshInflationRisk


Bitcoin just took its first serious step toward quantum resistance.
StarkWare has successfully demonstrated what it calls the first quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet.
The transaction used Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB), a method designed to protect BTC from future quantum attacks without changing Bitcoin’s current consensus rules.
Why does this matter?
Bitcoin currently relies on cryptography that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically threaten in the future.
QSB uses hash-based cryptography instead, creating another possible security path.
But there is an important catch.
This is not a permanent Bitcoin upgrade.
The experimental transaction required direct submission to a miner because the format is not currently relayed by standard Bitcoin nodes. The computational cost is also far higher than a normal transaction. 1
So I wouldn't call this “Bitcoin is now quantum-proof.”
It's better described as a proof that quantum-resistant spending can work on the existing network.
And StarkWare isn't alone.
Blockstream researchers have also proposed SHRINCS, another hash-based approach designed to protect Bitcoin against future quantum threats.
This could become one of the most important blockchain security conversations of the next decade.
Because the question isn't whether quantum computers can break Bitcoin today.
They can't.
The question is whether Bitcoin can upgrade its security early enough before that technology becomes a real threat.
$BTC $STRK $ETH $SOL $CKB
Would you trust Bitcoin more if it had a fully integrated post-quantum security layer?
#PCEToJacksonHole #AIMonetizationBroadens #BTCOptionsExpiryTest

🚨 BITCOIN JUST GOT ITS FIRST QUANTUM-SAFE TRANSACTION.
And most people probably missed it.
On August 26, StarkWare reportedly made history on the Bitcoin mainnet.
At block 964199, a transaction was mined by MARA Pool that merged 39,179 sats + 10,000 sats into 44,000 sats, paying a 5,179-sat fee.
But the transaction itself isn't the big story.
The big story is QSB — Quantum Safe Bitcoin.
#DailyOrbit
⚡ BITCOIN JUST PASSED A QUANTUM TEST — WITHOUT CHANGING BITCOIN.
StarkWare has completed a Quantum-Resistant Bitcoin (QSB) transaction directly on Bitcoin mainnet — no soft fork, no hard fork.
The test cost just 10,000 sats, ran for a few hours, and reportedly used only $150–$200 in GPU costs.
But there’s an important catch 👀
QSB can help reduce future quantum-attack risks, but BTC with already-exposed public keys still needs to be moved manually.
#DailyOrbit

Bitcoin just crossed a major security milestone.
StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy moved BTC into a quantum-resistant structure on mainnet — without changing Bitcoin’s consensus rules.
A quantum-safe escape route can work today.
But ~6M BTC may still be quantum-exposed.
The technology exists. The harder problem is migration.
Can vulnerable holders move before quantum computing becomes a real threat?
StarkWare's experiment matters less as a finished defense than as a test of Bitcoin's upgrade path. Moving 10K sats behind an added hash-based backup lock, without changing the protocol, shows that protection for selected funds may be possible before network-wide consensus forms.
The constraint is operational: hours per use, roughly $150-$200 in cost, and miner coordination make this unsuitable for ordinary wallets today. My read is that the nearer-term fit, if the process can be standardized, is high-value custody where slow execution is acceptable. It is a useful hedge, not proof that Bitcoin is quantum-safe. Not advice, just analysis.
#StarkWareQuantumBTC
LATEST: StarkWare completed a quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on mainnet using Avihu Levy’s QSB method, showing it can work under existing rules but requiring up to $200 in off-chain computing.
$BTC


What actually convinced me to keep studying $BTC is how its security model stays independent of any central operator. Bitcoin combines decentralized validation, predictable monetary issuance, censorship resistance, and a settlement network that has operated globally for years. Most projects usually achieve only one or two of these properties#IranSanctionsAndTalks #BTC80KHoldOrFold #AIEarningsWatch

🚨HUGE: Bitcoin's biggest existential threat just got its first official defense.
A quantum computer cracking Bitcoin's cryptography is the network's ultimate doomsday scenario.
StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy just locked real BTC in storage the company says no quantum computer can open.
Here's what makes it historic:
- No fork, no upgrade needed
- Runs on Bitcoin's existing rules
- Live on mainnet, block 964,199
- Each spend costs $75 to $200 in GPU compute
Over 6 MILLION BTC, 30% of supply, is still quantum-exposed, per Glassnode.



