Orbit Post Sitemap
Conclusion first: OKX officially announced today that VELODROME will be swapped for AERO at a ratio of 1:0.044, but at the current price, it's almost a free swap—0.044 AERO is worth $0.0331, while VELODROME is only selling at $0.0330, with a premium of just 0.2%.
Schedule: From 10/30 03:00 UTC, VELODROME/USDC and /EUR pairs will be delisted; on 11/3 at 04:00, deposits and withdrawals will be suspended; snapshot at 06:00; migration starts at 12:00 and continues until 11/4 10:00.
Three pitfalls: less than 10 tokens won't participate in migration; in-transit withdrawals are not counted; valuation is unavailable during migration.
The breakeven point is at AERO = $0.75 (0.0330 ÷ 0.044), perpetual current price is 0.7516, only 0.2% higher, and it has already dropped from 0.8044 today. Background: Aerodrome and Velodrome merged into Aero (Crypto Briefing, 9/30). OKX currently only has AERO-USDT perpetual contracts, no AERO spot.
So this is a proportional share swap, not a market price compensation—don't treat it as arbitrage.
Are you holding your VELODROME waiting for the swap, or handling it yourself now? $AERO $OP
Optimism’s Superchain vision raises an important question about Ethereum scaling: can multiple blockchain networks share infrastructure and standards while creating a more connected ecosystem? Interoperability could improve the developer experience, but ecosystem expansion does not automatically translate into value for OP holders. Governance utility, token economics, network adoption, and competition from alternative scaling solutions all deserve attention when assessing the project's longBTC is currently at 81,700, with 68% of accounts bullish, but only 43.5% of active trades are long — positions are bullish, but funds are selling. 81,200 is a key liquidation observation level; only after holding above 82,300 can recovery be discussed. ETF single-day outflow is 635 million. $BTC #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ #MetaQ3 revenue exceeds expectations, huge AI investment raises concerns
$META rose 2% after hours, then fell 6.98% the next day — two answers from the same earnings report.
▪️ Released after hours on 10/21, revenue 64.6 billion, +26% year-over-year, higher than the expected 63.3 billion
▪️ After-hours rise over 2%, priced based on earnings per share of 7.40 excluding the 9.89 billion settlement
▪️ On 10/22, opened down 3.03%, intraday low −8.29%, closed at 648.85, down 6.98% for the day
▪️ GAAP earnings per share on the same day 3.83, operating profit down 37% year-over-year
▪️ Capital expenditure lower limit raised from 130 billion to 135 billion; free cash flow negative 2.2 billion for the first time
▪️ On 10/23, intraday fell another 5.27%, down from 697.52 to about 614.7 over two days, a total decline of 11.9%
The two periods measure two different metrics from the same table. The 7.40 excludes the 9.89 billion settlement, the 3.83 does not, a difference of 3.57 dollars.
The close recovered 1.43% from the lowest point. The 5 billion increase in capital expenditure and the first negative cash flow are both written in the main text, which was not finished reading two hours after hours.#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ Q2增长率太高，链上热度骤降，Q3不会有之前的增长率#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ Trading revenue remains Robinhood's fastest-growing engine (Q2 year-over-year +44%), mainly driven by increased volume in stocks, options, and a surge in event contracts (prediction markets). Event contracts have become a new high-growth point, partially offsetting the decline in crypto business.
The user and asset base continue to expand, and the product offerings are becoming more diversified, no longer relying solely on trading.
Risks include: trading is inherently cyclical, crypto remains weak, and regulatory and competitive pressures also bring uncertainty.Hoarding tokens, scrambling for tokens, and playing the fool simultaneously—on October 23, 2026, the crypto market is witnessing an extreme divergence in capital logic.
BTC: The institutional defense line at $80,000, but ammunition is slowing down. Bitcoin is quoted at $81,596, almost flat (+0.01%). The $80,000 level is widely regarded as the average holding cost line for institutions and listed companies. However, the price support may not be confidence—net inflows into spot ETFs dropped sharply from $526.7 million to $23.2 million in a single day, a decline of over 95%. Capital is clearly turning cautious ahead of the inflation data release.
BCH: Small volume leverages institutional compliance narrative. BCH is quoted at $283.90, up 3.35% in a single day, ranking among the top gainers in the mainstream coins in the screenshot. The direct catalyst comes from CME Group launching regulated BCH contracts on October 19. FalconX and GSR have completed the first large block trade, and Grayscale's BCH spot ETF application is also progressing. Institutional funds are spreading from BTC to payment tokens with clear use cases, and BCH is benefiting from this round of "compliance spillover" bonus.
IRYS: A doubling without news is the most expensive doubling. IRYS surged 106% in a single day to $0.044, with market capitalization instantly rising from $39 million to $800 million.
BTC is where institutions are waiting for data, BCH is where institutions are rushing for compliance, and IRYS is where speculators are betting on who runs faster. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #OpenAI Valuation Downgrade, AI Giants Face Intensified Fundraising Competition
The boss has something to say
OpenAI's valuation has been downgraded, with the new round of financing aiming for a maximum of $30 billion, and the pre-money valuation lowered from 1.4 trillion to 1.25 trillion. The UAE sovereign fund is co-leading the investment, setting a decision deadline of October 30. Anthropic is expected to publicly submit its IPO application as early as October 23, with revenue of 16.3 billion in the first half of the year and a net loss of 80.7 billion, but 72 billion of that is a non-cash revaluation, so the actual operating loss is about 8.1 billion. Computing power investment is up to 750 billion.
I believe this signals that AI fundraising competition is heating up and valuations are becoming more cautious. Investors are starting to account for the bottomless pit of computing power expenses. Even the valuation of a leader like OpenAI has been cut, and money is not as easy to get as before.
This is an indirect positive for crypto. If AI giants face fundraising obstacles or valuation limits, their ability to attract capital weakens, and some risk capital may spill over into other assets. But this will take time; in the short term, the crypto market still depends on macro factors.
Market reaction is muted, with OpenAI down 1.20% and Anthropic slightly up 0.25%.
The crypto market took a waterfall drop last night; now we watch if the 80,000 level can hold. If it doesn't hold, expect a deeper pullback, with resistance above at 84,000 to 85,000. Do not chase the rise or sell in panic; set your stop losses properly. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
The above analysis is time-sensitive; orders must have stop losses set. Good luck.Has the short-term trend of the US stock market peaked??? $SNDK
I currently tend to believe that the Nasdaq, S&P, and QQQ have already shown a weekly-level false breakout, and are more likely to enter a volatile downward trend going forward. The Nasdaq is first expected to test 25500, the S&P 7400, and QQQ around 670, which are key support levels from previous bottoms.
Current daily performance of the US stock market: The three major indices opened lower but closed higher with huge volume the previous day, which should have indicated strong support. However, the next day after opening, they continued to decline, indicating that selling pressure above may still be heavy and buying has not yet reversed the trend.
However, a weekly weakening and an accelerated daily decline are two different things. The former is based on a high peak followed by a large-volume bearish candle; the latter still requires observation of the day's close. If a bearish engulfing candle appears that covers the previous day's candle, the short-term trend will be more dangerous, and further accelerated decline should be watched for.
I still maintain my previous view: currently, among global financial assets—gold, Bitcoin, Shanghai Composite, Nikkei, Dow Jones, Nasdaq, S&P, and the Korean index—
As of now (October 2026), only BTC is in a bear-to-bull transition phase; the others have either already shifted from bull to bear or are at the end of their bull phases.
#Storage chip stocks fall again, AI investment return concerns intensify Yesterday, the Houthi forces attacked Saudi Arabia 4 times within 48 hours, pushing Brent crude oil above $113.
According to the script, safe-haven assets should rise. The actual result was: Bitcoin once dropped to 81,107 (−3.7%), Ethereum to 2,382 (−3.7%), and spot gold fell below 4,030. Among the four lines, only crude oil was rising.
The conclusion that Bitcoin is not a safe-haven asset is too simplistic; it cannot explain why gold also fell.
The real mechanism is liquidity squeeze. Tesla's Q3 capital expenditure was 4.73 billion, expected 7.96 billion; the AI capital expenditure narrative is starting to leak. South Korea fell 3.52%, Hang Seng dropped over 3%, Nikkei fell 2.7%. When institutions need cash to top up margin, they sell the most liquid assets. Gold is one, Bitcoin is another.
But one data point is more important than price: derivatives trading volume rose 19% to 226.6 billion, open interest fell 2.46% to 141.8 billion, and liquidations increased 52%. Volume up, open interest down—everyone is closing positions, not opening new ones. This is turnover, not a collapse.
The most memorable thing yesterday was another event: Solana's Alpenglow upgrade officially activated overnight, and SOL fell 2.4% that day. Positive news delivered, price still fell. This market now pays only for the present, not the future.
The only line that is growing long-term is another: stablecoin payment volume reached $482 billion, transaction count rose 71% to 1.04 billion, and average transaction size dropped from $544 to $462. More users are making small, real payments. The part no one speculates on is the part truly growing.
Safe-haven assets never avoid war; they avoid others' leverage.
Not investment advice, risk on yourself.
#GeopoliticalConflictAndCrypto $BTCWhales are overall bearish, how should HYPE holders interpret this?
Whales are collectively bearish, should you follow suit? Don’t rush to conclusions. Currently, whales hold about $8.55 billion in total positions on the platform, with a long-short ratio of 0.87, slightly bearish overall. The numbers are clear, but their meaning needs to be unpacked.
Whales’ short positions don’t necessarily mean a bearish outlook. Many institutions hold positions as part of a portfolio; they may hold longs in spot or elsewhere and open shorts in contracts as a hedge. What you see as bearish might just be their insurance policy. A common mistake when watching position data is mistaking others’ risk management for directional signals. Furthermore, the 0.87 long-short ratio shows limited deviation, indicating whales are cautious rather than panicked. This caution mostly reflects expectations of short-term volatility, not a rejection of $HYPE’s fundamentals.
What really matters is sentiment transmission: whales being bearish suppresses buying willingness, reduces price elasticity, and prolongs the grinding phase. This stage is most likely to flush out positions without a plan.
So for holders, whale data should be observed, but focus on structure, not direction—whether position sizes are stable and if there are extreme one-sided moves matters far more than minor changes after the decimal in the long-short ratio. What shoes others wear while walking and which path you take are two different things. Today, the Hang Seng Tech Index plunged 5% in a single day, and the buy list I've been watching since the end of July finally got a window for repricing. 📉 This is not a moment of panic; it is precisely the time to intensify research—the market is handing chips back from those chasing highs to those willing to trade time for space. My observation framework is simple: the dividends from AI application layers will not be monopolized by one company but will rotate and spread along the major players. The U.S. stock market has already played this out—$NVDA led the way, followed by MSFT and META taking turns to run independent rallies. The same script is brewing in Chinese tech assets. Tencent is the core target on my list, not because it is strong now, but because when AI commercializes, it has the infrastructure and scenarios to inherit the rotation. The key question has never been "whether to buy," but "when to buy." At the current price level, I am ready to start allocating to Hang Seng Tech and Tencent, with a clear long-term holding mindset. Referring to the Hang Seng position built at the end of 2022: it only broke even in 2024 after enduring a long period of volatility. This experience did not leave me with shadows but with pricing insight: the bottom area inevitably comes with repeated fluctuations, and the coming months provide a sufficient operational window. Most people interpret a 5% single-day drop as trend damage, but from another perspective—this is exactly the entry discount needed for a rotation thesis. The real confirmation signal worth tracking is whether the commercialization pace of AI on the major players' application side continues, not the index's single-day rise or fall. If subsequent leading companies' earnings reports show accelerated AI-related revenue, the current pullback will be$ETH
Institutions seem lively this round, but I judge that the truly active players are not buyers, but rather repositioning and hedging.
CME Group's Q3 data just came out: Ethereum derivatives had a notional volume of $118.8 billion, Bitcoin $326.7 billion, and the entire crypto derivatives quarterly notional volume was $469.5 billion, all records. Yet in the same statistics, on Thursday, the US spot ETH ETF saw a net outflow of $110.6 million. Record trading volume, but spot is redeeming—these two numbers together reveal the real situation.
On the market, ETH is now at 2407, fluctuating between 2360 and 2419 in 24 hours, with a perpetual funding rate of 0.045‰ and open interest of $1.46 billion. The price hasn't moved much, but turnover on the books is maxed out.
With this kind of divergence, I prefer to wait—wait for which side first breaks the price out of this range. Acting now likely means getting hit from both sides.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ 81,000 has been reclaimed, but don't rush to cheer — tonight we’re just watching if it can hold overnight
First, admit the mistake: this afternoon I said the judgment of breaking below 81,000 was invalid, the daytime low did hit 80,925, I admit that. Now BTC is at 81,627 (-0.13%), 81,000 has been reclaimed. But reclaiming and holding steady are two different things; the scars remain.
Three signals from tonight’s market:
First, altcoins moved first. Trending on the square: Pepe +14% leads the altcoin rebound, BTC -0.13% stands still. Risk appetite isn’t dead, but money doesn’t dare enter BTC, indicating this wave is just retail investors seeking thrills in altcoins.
Second, fees are slightly positive. BTC +0.01%, ETH +0.0043%, SOL +0.0033%, bulls are still paying interest, but cautiously; no one dares to leverage all in.
Third, open interest hasn’t shrunk. 31,557 BTC, $2.575 billion, bulls haven’t been washed out, nor liquidated — neither longs nor shorts have lost or won.
Looking ahead: from tonight until tomorrow morning, BTC will continue to consolidate between 81,000–82,100. The falsification line is clear: if it breaks below 80,900, this judgment is invalid, look down to 80,000; if it stands above 82,100, it counts as rebound repair confirmation, and I’ll admit my mistake in tomorrow’s opening.
Chasing longs or shorts tonight isn’t worthwhile, control your hands. What do you think? Comment below.Bitcoin is currently consolidating around 81592, ETH has dropped back to 2402, and SOL shows stronger resistance, holding the 104 level with a slight pullback of 1.07%. Looking at these coins, none have fallen much, but the funding rate signal deserves attention: the rates for SOL, BTC, and ETH all remain positive, meaning bulls are still paying interest to shorts during this correction.
Last night, the entire network liquidated $436 million, with 90% of the liquidations being long positions, nearly 98,000 accounts were forcibly closed.
Among them, there was a large long position of 7.92 million entered at 81661 that got trapped. Even after a round of stop hunting, the remaining bulls did not exit but instead continued to add positions.
Positive funding rates indicate that the bull shakeout is not sufficient; this batch of chips will be potential pressure for further downside.
On the options side, the trend is one-sided: 60% of BTC options are calls, and ETH calls exceed 61%, with a large amount of capital betting on the upside.
The market is currently experiencing intense tug-of-war: whales have accumulated 89,000 BTC in the past month, but ETFs have continuously seen outflows throughout October, combined with contract longs holding firm, resulting in a stalemate between bulls and bears.
Compared to candlesticks, sentiment indicators are more tangible; the Fear and Greed Index dropped from 68 to 50, a direct 18-point fall in one day, showing the market heat is rapidly cooling.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #MetaQ3营收超预期，巨额AI投入引发担忧 #存储芯片股再度下跌，AI投资回报担忧加剧 $BTC $ETH $ZEC $SOL
Most people don't recognize the name JLTXX; it is a government money market fund registered by JPMorgan, and this time it moved onto Solana along with MONY. I reviewed the terms, and its investment approach specifically targets stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act framework. Wall Street money is meant to feed the stablecoin system directly through on-chain funds, that's what I gathered.
JPMorgan Asset Management manages $4.8 trillion, and last December it issued the first tokenized money market fund on Ethereum; this time it expanded to a second chain. Qualified U.S. investors subscribe and redeem through Morgan Money, with shares directly credited to their on-chain addresses.
SOL is currently at 104.6, fluctuating between 103 and 105 in 24 hours, and the market hasn't reacted at all. Such news never reflects in the price on the same day; when institutions really move money in, it happens over a timeframe of months.
As a contract trader, I'm far from this scale of play and can basically only watch from the sidelines. But institutions choosing a chain is the same principle as choosing an exchange; once chosen, it's a real vote.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ I came across a set of numbers and almost threw my phone.
Papertrade's daily dividends for PAPER stakers were still $6.72 million on October 15. By the 21st, it was only about $88,300. In less than a week, it was cut by nearly 98.7%.
An even more shocking comparison is here. A few days ago, some people could earn about $220,000 a day just from staking. By the 21st, all stakers across the entire network combined only received $88,300. On the best day (October 10), the whole pool distributed about $24 million in one day; now, not even the scraps remain. The locked TVL also dropped from about $105 million to around $40 million.
This platform previously fed dividends from traders' losses; the bigger the losses, the fatter the dividends. Later, PAPER was designated as permanently non-transferable, leaving arbitrageurs no way out, and the overflow portion given to stakers shrank accordingly. On top of that, with issuance rule adjustments, the new PAPER no longer comes with a new USDC dividend pool, so holders can only watch their daily income decline.
This is the daily life in crypto. One day you're showing off daily earnings of hundreds of thousands, the next day the entire market can't even reach that amount. Collecting rent, the pool changes first.#特斯拉Q3汽车毛利率回升，自由现金流转正
$TSLA Q3 Earnings Summary
Car sales remain steady, all money poured into AI.
Revenue 28.05 billion (flat year-over-year), adjusted EPS 0.48 beats expectations; deliveries 486,500 vehicles, automotive gross margin (excluding credits) rebounded to 18.1%—but regulatory credit revenue dropped from 417 million to 113 million in one year, no cushion, this 18.1% is clean.
Profit eaten by R&D: gross profit 5.49 billion, R&D 2.76 billion (+69%), operating profit only 720 million (−56%).
Cash flow contrasts with Meta: operating cash flow 6.26 billion, FCF turned positive +1.53 billion, cash 45.4 billion; full-year capex guidance cut from 25 billion to 20 billion as a timing push, Terafab still plans to invest hundreds of billions before 2028.
Valuation is brutal: stock price $386 = TTM adjusted PE about 225x; at 30x PE, EPS needs to be $12.9, which is 7.5 times current, the difference fully bet on Robotaxi, Optimus, FSD. And the timeline hasn’t advanced: Optimus mass production at least one year away, external sales not until end of next year, Robotaxi visible revenue only in Q2 next year. After the call, stock price dropped 2%~4%, that’s what’s driving the decline.#Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ Robinhood's recent trading revenue has surged, but its structure has changed significantly: stocks + options and prediction contracts have become the main drivers, while crypto business revenue continues to weaken.$ETH has been grinding between 2390-2417 all day today, with such small fluctuations it's making people sleepy 😴
But I'm watching the upside. After surging to 2527 yesterday, it dropped all the way down. The 2430 area was a platform that held sideways for several hours around noon yesterday before breaking. This morning's rebound only reached a high of 2416, not even touching it. What was support before is now very likely resistance.
Looking at the data: open interest hasn't really dropped these past two days, about 1.8 billion USD, funding rate at 0.0044%, very neutral. This shows no one is panicking to cut losses; there is room to move, just lacking direction.
My plan:
Direction: short on rebounds, no chasing shorts
Entry: 2425-2432
Stop loss: 2448, if it breaks above this, it means I was wrong, admit it
Target 1: 2390 (today afternoon's box bottom)
Target 2: 2360 (around the low point of the early morning spike)
If it breaks below 2390 directly tonight without a rebound, I won't chase; I'll wait for a pullback. If it breaks and holds above 2448 with volume, this trade is void, and I'll wait for a pullback to go long.
Friday night around US stock market close tends to have sharp moves, so I'll lighten my position.
Just my personal opinion, not investment advice, DYOR
#ETH #ContractStrategy #EthereumAccording to Bloomberg, prediction market platform Kalshi is pitching U.S. inflation futures products to major banks and hedge funds, planning to launch related contracts in December to expand institutional business and compete with traditional financial exchanges.
The impact of macro news on risk assets is not simply that good data leads to gains and bad data leads to losses. Stronger data may improve growth expectations but also raise the interest rate path; these two forces do not always align.
How much the market has already priced in also determines the reaction. Data that meets consensus and data that significantly deviates from expectations, even if the published values are the same, should not be interpreted in the same way.
My observation sequence is whether interest rate expectations have changed, whether the dollar and U.S. Treasuries respond, and then whether risk assets continue. Isolating the initial post-release fluctuation alone cannot represent the completion of the entire pricing cycle.
$BTCJapan is going to raise interest rates.
This December, the central bank and the US will act together.
Crypto community veterans should remember this script:
People borrowing yen to trade crypto are everywhere in the world.
Once Japan raises rates, borrowing costs rise, and they can only sell crypto to repay debts.
That's how July 2024 came about.
Bitcoin dropped from 70,000 to 49,000.
Will it repeat this time?
Two variables:
1. The US also raises rates in the same month, so the interest rate gap doesn't widen, halving the damage
2. The crypto price itself is uncooperative, at 81,000, it failed twice to break through 84,000
My stance:
These two events at the end of the year are minefields.
The mines might not explode, but no one will add positions in a minefield.
Don't get carried away in the short term; watch the Bank of Japan's statement on October 30.
If it really crashes, don't panic; it's still not the time to pick up chips.
#Bitcoin #BTCAlthough $SNDK has not looked promising recently, you really need to think carefully if you plan to short at this position.
After the US stock market opened with some volatility last night, it rallied by several dozen points, then kept falling, hitting a low of 1225. Now the price is slowly declining around 1288.
First, calculate your profit if you short; is the risk-reward ratio really worth it?
There is strong support below at 1215. On the 18th, there was a spike down to this level, and last night's drop didn't break it, so it can be considered a recent iron bottom. Unless the Korean stock market continues to crash or the storage sector suffers a major sell-off, without significant negative news, I think it will be hard to break through in the next few days. From 1288 down to 1215, you have at most just over 5 points of profit margin.
Let's calculate the risk-reward ratio for this trade.
First, 1215 is a strong support level confirmed multiple times, with a large accumulation of bottom-fishing buy orders and short covering. If you chase shorts at this level, you might just short at the point where short momentum is exhausted.
Second, from 1288 to 1300, even up to 1350, there is a lot of trapped positions and resistance from rebounds. If there is any slight positive news or the US market opens with a small rally, the price could rebound directly, and you might lose those 5 points within minutes or even get stuck halfway up the mountain.
There is no volume surge; the price is just slowly grinding down. This kind of movement easily traps short sellers, then the main force suddenly hits a big bullish candle, wiping out your stop loss. The fact that 1225 was not broken last night already shows strong support below. The bears want to push down but lack the strength. $BTC $ETH $SNDK pullback is about to end! The last round of decline will finish, then it will rise again! Public layout!
Why wait for 1166? The reasons are as follows:
First, risk-reward ratio. Entering now at 1278, the resistance above from 1300 to 1366 is all trapped positions, so the upside space is limited; if the stop loss is set at 1080, the risk is nearly 200 points. But waiting for the drop to 1166, which is a previous strong chip concentration area with a very clear defense line, setting stop loss at 1080 only bears a risk of over 80 points to aim for 200 points profit, this calculation makes sense.
Second, technical demand. This wave surged over 100 points rapidly from the bottom, short-term indicators are already overbought, profit-taking could dump anytime. 1278 is most likely just an intermediate rebound; it must retest a second time to wash out floating chips.
Third, fundamental logic. The AI demand for storage chips hasn't collapsed, long-term agreements remain, this drop is a misvaluation caused by the overall tech stock sell-off in the US market. 1166 is the golden pit after emotional selling exhaustion and squeezing out liquidity; buying more here has the greatest chance of winning.
My execution discipline is very strict: place orders near 1166 to enter, stop loss unconditionally at 1080, if it breaks down effectively, admit defeat immediately. The first target is 1260, if broken through, look at 1366. At 1260, close half the position to withdraw principal, let the rest run for profit. For every 50 points price increase, raise the stop loss by 30 points to tightly lock in profits. #SanDiskMSCIRebalancingEffective, NAND valuation under focus #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Q3 profits are still mainly driven by HBM3E+ and price increases in general DRAM; HBM4 has limited impact on this quarter's boost, being more of an expected theme rather than a current earnings engine, with real volume contribution expected in Q4 and beyond.
• ✅Positive: HBM4 unit price is significantly higher than HBM3E, with a gross margin over 70%, and has already secured long-term contracts with top customers; spot price increases in storage combined with rising server DRAM shipments provide a strong profit floor.
• ⚠️Pressure: Nvidia's new GPU delay and slow certification tuning result in low HBM4 shipments in Q3, yield ramp-up and TSMC base die outsourcing increase costs; Samsung is catching up on HBM4, putting pressure on market share and pricing.
• 📌Key financial report focus on 3 indicators: overall HBM revenue share, HBM4 shipment guidance, and average HBM price; an upward revision of HBM4 guidance would be a positive surprise signal.
In short: Q3 relies on old products to benefit from the cycle, HBM4 is an option, not current profit.Wall Street has officially given $BTC a "ten-year return range" for the first time, marking another step toward institutionalization.
Hard data: JPMorgan Asset Management's 2027 "Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions" includes Bitcoin for the first time, with a baseline annualized compound return of about 10%, higher than its assumptions for the US stock market at about 7.5% and gold at about 5.5%; volatility assumption is about 55%. Bull market scenario is about 16.6%, bear market scenario is an annualized loss just over 10%; the report still does not include BTC in the main covariance matrix, positioning it more as a speculative hedge.
A ten-year baseline of 10%, do you think this is conservative or already optimistic? #摩根大通首次将比特币纳入长期收益预测 $BTC $PEPE over 50x, entry at 0.000004931, target at 0.000005051, floating profit 121.67%. The chart shows a typical "sharp drop—stabilization—slight rise," with many spikes and a lack of smoothness. This is not a consensus-driven buy but someone bottom-fishing for bargains. There is selling pressure above 0.0000051, and 0.0000052 is the next hurdle.
I have a bad habit when trading: the bigger the floating profit, the more I treat myself as a coward. I won’t add to this position; I’ll take half the profit first and push the rest to breakeven with zero risk. If it hits 0.0000052, I’ll take it; if not, I’ll exit.
If it falls back to 0.0000049 near cost, I’ll admit the mistake and won’t stubbornly hold. Sideways consolidation after a 50x gain shakes out more people than a rise; taking profit is real money. $ETH $BTC
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $MU playing like this tonight!
What's the plan for tonight? The stocks in the same sector have long been tied together in the big picture, don't expect it to have an independent run. If there is really strong capital pulling, $SKHYNIX and $SNDK will move along too. The market is stuck around 872, just hitting the 30-day moving average resistance. Plus, this round of storage price hikes is all concentrated on high-end HBM products, while the general consumer side underneath is actually very weak, spot prices can't even rise, so my overall trend bias remains bearish.
Micron is currently around 866, open short directly here. If the US stock market rebounds, add to the position. Stop loss strictly above 900, take profit first targets 855, if it really breaks down, look at 830.
If you want to double your position before the New Year, weigh it yourself, just stick to the circle you trust and follow closely! $SNDK $SKHYNIX #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ BTC $80,000 Defense Battle, This Time It's a Bit Different,
BTC briefly dipped below $81,000 intraday, hitting a low of $80,961, then barely recovered to around $82,000, with a 24-hour decline still around 1%. On the surface, it looks like a routine pullback, but breaking down the details, something feels off.
The trigger is the Middle East. Reports revealed that the US and Israel plan to take action against Iran after the midterm elections, pushing Brent crude oil prices directly above $110, instantly sparking inflation expectations. Risk assets collectively took a hit; the Nasdaq fell 2.6% the previous night, and BTC’s drop is justified. But what really raises caution is the funding side: Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $635 million yesterday, the largest single-day outflow since June, with BlackRock’s IBIT alone withdrawing $254 million. Meanwhile, a certain whale deposited 4,000 BTC worth $327 million to Binance and Deribit over the past 5 hours. ETFs are withdrawing, whales are moving coins to exchanges; these two events combined strongly suggest short-term selling pressure.
My personal view leans defensive. The $80,000 level is widely regarded as the average institutional cost basis; as long as it doesn’t break down effectively, the structure remains intact. But with ETF outflows happening so fast, even if it holds, it only means "not worse," not a sign of strengthening. Next, watch two things: the daily close at $80,000 and whether ETF outflows are a one-day purge or a sustained trend. The former determines sentiment, the latter determines direction. $BTC $ETH $XAUT This wave of SanDisk (SNDK) sell-off is indeed quite brutal, closing near 1260 on Thursday, dropping over 8% in a single day, with intraday volatility also quite scary. The article is right, this is not just a problem with SanDisk alone, but the entire storage sector (Micron, Western Digital all dropped together) was collectively hammered by funds, compounded by the Nasdaq dropping 2.6% that day, renewed doubts about the sustainability of AI spending, plus the exaggerated hype over Changxin's slight DRAM progress. Naturally, the highly elastic storage stocks took the first hit.
The fundamentals haven't actually collapsed yet. Data center demand is still consuming NAND, prices and gross margins were previously ridiculously high, and company guidance remains strong. Most analyst target prices are still above 2000. Western Digital just reported earnings that beat expectations, yet it was still hammered, a typical "sell the good news" scenario. The market is now more concerned about whether the cycle has peaked and if AI capital expenditures will slow down, rather than single-quarter numbers.
In the short term, I agree with the teacher's view: this is now the emotional recovery phase after being hurt, so don't rush to bottom-fish for a rebound. Before the sector truly warms up, it’s easy to get hit repeatedly. With the Nasdaq and peers like Micron and Western Digital unstable, it’s hard for SanDisk to strengthen independently. There was a bit of a rebound pre-market today, but the strength still depends on whether it can hold after the open.
Going forward, focus on two things: first, its own earnings report on the 29th, whether it can continue to provide strong guidance and dispel expectations of a "cycle peak"; second, the capital flow in the Nasdaq and the entire storage sector. The story is still ongoing, but the window for profit-taking has indeed opened. You can lay low with a small position to observe; rushing to go all-in to bet on a rebound carries significant risk.
Friends, what do you think?#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings My view on SK hynix Q3: HBM4 demand from AI inference is a real tailwind, but a lot of the optimism looks priced in already. The guidance and HBM4 commentary will matter more than the headline numbers. Not financial advice.Oh my god, what's going on? Sisters, this coin is really fierce, it surged 90% in one day. As soon as I saw it, I immediately shorted it, but I got trapped right after entering!
Look at this damn $IRYS, it skyrocketed 90% in one day! I thought it was definitely the whales pumping to dump, so I impulsively shorted at 0.04137. But I got trapped right after entering, now it’s up to 0.04212, floating loss -5.43%! This demon coin doesn’t play by the rules at all!
But I dug into it carefully, this surge is all a scheme! There’s no new positive news, it’s purely capital rotation; although the trading volume looks like $150 million, the authenticity score is only 14/100, most of it is wash trading and matched orders; the main driving force is retail investors from Korea’s Upbit, plus its small market cap and very thin order book, even a little buying pressure can push it flying.
This kind of capital pool with no fundamental support, relying entirely on wash trading and retail sentiment to pump, once the buying pressure can’t keep up, the drop will definitely be faster than anyone else.
This time I’m definitely not stubbornly holding on. The stop loss is already set, if it keeps mindlessly surging, I’ll admit defeat and leave.
$BTC $ETH #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Holding Yes on HOOD beating earnings. Trading volumes and crypto activity have been strong this quarter, and the market is pricing a beat at 74%. Small position, just sharing my view. #HOOD #EarningsSeasonBTC at 81,000, ETH dropped 2,400, and over 100 million is still buried below 80,000
This round isn't a problem within the crypto circle itself; Wall Street is dragging it down.
Last night, the Nasdaq fell 2.6%. Panic over AI spending spread, leading to indiscriminate sell-offs in tech stocks; Brent crude in the Middle East surged 4% to 114, and safe-haven funds all fled to government bonds. Risk assets got hit from all sides: BTC dropped from 84,000 to 81,000, ETH lost 2,400 directly, altcoins fell even worse, with over 400 million USD liquidated in 24 hours, 70% of which were long positions.
But what I'm watching isn't the current moment, it's the orders beneath the market.
Below the $BTC 80,000 round number, positions at 79,866, 80,070, and 79,049 have over 100 million USD in long orders stacked. If it really hits 80,000, these stop losses will likely trigger en masse, potentially pushing prices down to 79,000 or 78,000.
$ETH is even more fragile; if it can't reclaim 2,400, there’s another row of orders at 2,339 and 2,309 below.
There's an abnormal signal to mention: the BTC spot ETF attracted 528 million USD yesterday against the trend. Someone is buying on the spot side, but longs on the contract side are still being liquidated. The two sides are fighting, indicating volatility is far from over.
Tonight we have US manufacturing data, and next Tuesday the FOMC meeting. Any rebound before then I consider weak. If 80,000 doesn't hold, don't rush to bottom-fish. I have been watching OKEx BTC all day, from 1 AM until now, twenty hours, fluctuating back and forth within the 81,000 to 82,000 range, this 1,000 range. If we say it has stabilized, then it has stabilized.
But the price isn't moving, perpetual positions keep increasing, with about 800 more longs in the same segment, now totaling 31,600 contracts.
At first, I also thought that after the ETF ran, someone was buying spot at the bottom. Checking the positions, the long accounts are still more than twice the shorts, but the top 5% of large holders are slightly bearish based on position size.
So this 1,000 range box is formed by both sides of the contract pushing positions into it; I haven't seen spot supporting it underneath. The more positions piled up, the more violent the breakout will be, but I won't guess which direction.
If by this time tomorrow night OKEx BTC is still stuck within this 1,000 range and positions haven't dropped, then this theory would mean I was wrong. #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ $BTC dominance is 59.4%, the entire market fell 2.63% in 24 hours, Bitcoin held its ground, and all the gains are in the fringes. Looking at these sectors together, they form the same trend: new launch platforms plus meme. Kaito's Launchpad, wallet IDO, and frog-themed projects all rely on attention and new issuances to push prices. USDT market cap dropped 0.09% in 24 hours, with no new money off-exchange. Dominance remains high, and funds haven't moved into altcoins. This is small capital within the existing pool moving back and forth among several hotspots. Fear and greed index fell from 63 a week ago to 50, indicating cooling sentiment. This round is a stock game with poor sustainability. The end signals to watch are twofold: the Launchpad and IDO sectors turning negative in 24-hour gains, while dominance continues to rise, with money flowing back to $BTC, causing small caps to retreat together. Conversely, if USDT market cap turns to expansion and dominance declines, that would indicate new money entering the market and rotation potentially spreading.A single-day outflow of over $600 million looks glaring, but it seems more like "a week's inflows being digested," not yet a trend reversal to bearish.
Hard data: The US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net outflow of about $635.6 million on Thursday, the largest single-day outflow since June; IBIT led the decline with about $254.1 million, FBTC about $217.5 million, and ARKB about $109.4 million. However, the week still recorded a net inflow of about $440 million, with the first three days totaling approximately $1.08 billion in inflows. BTC's current price is fluctuating around 81,000, with US tech stocks and AI spending concerns simultaneously suppressing risk appetite.
Do you trust the resilience of "weekly net inflows still positive," or see the "large single-day outflow" as a top signal? #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ $BTC 📉 The market is stagnant with slight ripples, so why did IRYS surge 100%?
BTC is around 81600. Before the FOMC, volume is extremely low, ETF funds are cautious, and big money is hesitant to act rashly, making the market look like dead water. If the macro environment doesn't materialize, BTC will likely continue to oscillate narrowly.
IRYS is the wildest performer today. It surged over 100% in 24 hours, topping the charts. The catalyst was South Korea's Upbit announcing its listing, triggering a flood of capital and crushing the shorts (liquidations were brutal). This is purely a liquidity play driven by Korean retail buying combined with short squeeze; the project itself has no major announcements, so don't mistake a short squeeze for value investing.
PEPE sentiment is warming up. Without any exclusive positive news, this is purely hot money rotating from mainstream coins to MEME and altcoins. If the market continues sideways, such localized groupings will repeatedly appear.
Trading insight: When the market is sideways, don't just stare at the candlesticks; watch where the money is going. Vertical surges like IRYS combined with upcoming token unlocks mean chasing now is like catching a flying knife. Better to miss out than to make a mistake.
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC $IRYS $PEPE $ONDO
Underlying assets are stable, so why does the token still have high volatility?
In this morning's spot snapshot, ONDO's 24-hour price change was -6.65%, ranging from 0.4213 to 0.4621 USDT.
The token is not an automatic reflection of the underlying product's earnings. If there is no direct link between asset management scale, product revenue, and token equity, the market will still assign high elasticity based on risk preference.
If verifiable equity allows business growth to convert into sustained demand, the valuation can be revised upward; if product growth and token holder returns remain continuously disconnected, the narrative premium should be reduced.📉 The US market opens in half an hour, BTC hasn't moved more than 1.4% in 22 hours
Let's reconcile first. Last night, "If it stands back at 82,500, I'll admit I'm wrong" was not broken, the high was 82,095.2; the later target of 81,000 was also not reached, the low was 80,924.9, off by 75, half wrong.
This morning, "Touching 80,000 at 20:00" was also wrong, after the release the low was 81,245.7, off by 1,246. The 18:00 mark using the previous night's 80,924.9 as reference is off by 925, also wrong.
Today BTC +0.04%, trading volume -24.82%.
Open interest reached a new high from 3.06 million to 3.155 million contracts; funding rate settled at 0.00669%, next period set at 0.01000%.
In one hour, the entire market only exploded 2.77 million. No one is closing or adding positions, bulls are paying the original price — this is not bottom grinding, it's idle trading.
The driving force can only come from outside. Yesterday's US market already gave half the answer: the largest single trade in 24 hours was not BTC, but a SOXL long position of 4.3379 million.
US tech stocks are all green, energy storage is rising against the trend — money is moving from downstream to upstream.
Prediction: Tonight at 00:00, BTC funding rate settlement will break 0.008%, if it is ≥0.008%, I'll admit I'm wrong.
When the price doesn't move, the funding rate is the only number still speaking.
Do you think we are waiting for the US market, or is no one left?
$BTC #ETF single-day outflow exceeds $600 million, can BTC stabilize?
This does not constitute investment advice. No stream today, so I’ll leave you with this 👇
$BTC is sitting at the 8.4th percentile of its 17-year power-law trend (log-log straight line).
$XAU is at the 93.5th percentile of its 56-year exponential trend (log-linear straight line).
📊 Which one will hit a new all-time high (100th percentile) first — Bitcoin or Gold? 👀
#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings $FIL Why did it drop, have you understood? The daily ascending channel has already been broken, the daily chart looks very, very bad. I don't know if it's intentional by the whales or if they really finished unloading around 1.2. Anyway, my strategy is to liquidate my spot position as soon as it breaks 1, regardless of missing out or whatever. The daily chart is clearly performing poorly and looks ugly already. Of course, I'm not telling you to short it, I'm just saying its daily chart has deter#存储芯片股再度下跌，AI投资回报担忧加剧
Brothers, memory chip stocks have crashed again. SanDisk and Micron have fallen one after another, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index is under pressure again.
Why the drop? It's not that AI has no demand, but the market is starting to "settle accounts." Tech giants are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into capital expenditures, but monetization on the application side is too slow. The 10-year US Treasury yield is approaching 5%, and capital simply has no patience to wait for long-term promises. Previously, "building computing power and buying chips" was enough to pay the bill; now they only ask, "Where is the profit?" Institutions have started ruthlessly cutting valuations.
BTC, as a high Beta asset, is also suffering. After falling below 82,000, it failed to recover and is now hovering around 81,700, down more than 3% in 24 hours, with over 100,000 liquidations. High interest rates combined with tech stock risk aversion have severely suppressed risk appetite.
Key levels to watch: Support below at 81,300, break to look at 80,000; resistance above at 82,100-82,500.
Two sentences for trading: If you have a position, set a stop loss below 81,000, don't stubbornly hold on; if you are empty-handed, control your hands, don't catch a falling knife, wait for a pullback to 81,300 with shrinking volume to stabilize or to stand back above 82,100 before considering the right side. The AI bubble is not yet squeezed out, and BTC is unlikely to improve in the short term. What do you think? Let's chat in the comments. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Stock tokens are not stocks, don't to see it as a positive. Stock original rule states: Only using own funds to make markets in the pool means no need to register as a market maker. How is this calculated: what is saved is the registration threshold, not the disclosure and record-keeping. Previously, such institutions couldn't enter because of licensing restrictions. Now the threshold is lowered, and what comes in is own funds. The pool uses a pool-building model, not order queueing; depth depNominally $2.07 billion, longs only account for about 1%.
Hyperliquid position snapshot (around 17:40): Tracking 16 large accounts with a total of 494 positions, nominal entry about $2.07 billion, longs about 1%; the largest single position is a short ETH position of about $247.3 million, with an unrealized loss of about $7.6 million, and the portfolio's unrealized P&L is about −$20.8 million. At the time of writing, ETH is about 2396, BTC about 81627.
What worries me more is: large accounts are almost all short stacked near 2400, once the direction rebounds, the short squeeze could be very sharp.
Are you betting they will continue to add short ETH, or preparing for a short squeeze first?
I will continue to analyze as these large accounts' positions change, stay tuned so you don't miss out.
$ETH Risk appetite is contracting; this time the crypto sector is not the main player
Overnight, U.S. stocks weakened, with the tech sector leading the decline. Funds moved from overvalued assets toward defensive ones, and discussions about AI capital expenditure returns have reignited. As risk appetite contracts, the crypto market is under pressure, but this downturn did not originate in the crypto sector.
$BTC fell from above 84,800 to around 81,400, hitting a daily low of 80,935. ETFs saw a net outflow of $635 million in one day, with IBIT alone accounting for $254 million, wiping out the $1.08 billion inflow from the previous three days. 80,000 is the next consolidation zone to watch, having previously served as a support level multiple times.
$ETH dipped to 2,358.99 before recovering to around 2,400, precisely at the 100-day EMA. About 36% of circulating supply is staked, and exchange reserves continue to decline; however, ETFs still had a net outflow of $110 million yesterday, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $75.5 million. Supply is locked, demand is withdrawing.
$SOL is around 104; after the Alpenglow upgrade was realized, it actually dropped 5.2%, reflecting a "sell the news" reaction. ETF net outflow was $8.515 million, a small scale, but given the simultaneous bleeding in the other two, there is no foundation for an independent rally.
In short: today's main bearish driver is the contraction of risk appetite, with the three coins merely different points along the same transmission chain bearing the pressure.
This is only a market record and does not constitute investment advice.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #闪迪存储业务高增长能否延续？
UNITREE contract surged 21% in 24 hours, a short squeeze is happening on-chain, but I’m not chasing either long or short at this level.
First, clarify that UNITREE is not a coin issued by Yushu; it’s a synthetic perpetual contract tracking the A-share Yushu Technology 688836, open 24 hours, with no equity.
Today, A-share Yushu hit the 20cm daily limit up, closing at 624 yuan, and the contract followed from 74 to 93.5, up about 50% in 5 days.
I think this wave is a short squeeze: many people are adding high-leverage shorts on-chain, funding rates dropped to -1%, shorts pay heavy rent daily, and when A-shares hit the limit up, it triggered a chain of liquidations.
The problem is A-share PE is already over 400 times, with earnings report on October 29, valuation is all about expectations.
Chasing longs, I fear the good news is fully priced; shorting, the -1% funding rate and the short squeeze can grind you down, neither side is comfortable.
I’m just waiting for levels: lightly long if volume holds above 94.2, targeting 100; also can try if it pulls back and stabilizes around the 82 platform.
If it breaks below today’s low of 74.2, the short squeeze dies out, bulls are invalidated.
Very small position, don’t naked short at the peak of the short squeeze.
Are you betting the robot short squeeze continues until the earnings report, or do you think the limit up is the top?
$UNITREE
#宇树科技 #合约 After SpaceX went public, Musk's assets integration advanced to the equity level. On October 21, Musk confirmed that Tesla and SpaceX each set up independent special boards to evaluate the merger; he recused himself due to conflicts of interest. The intersection of chips, robotics, and orbital data centers forms the industrial logic. In June, SpaceX IPO'd at $135 per share, while Morningstar's fair value was only $63 per share, about 53% below the pricing. Tesla shareholders may demand 50%-66% equity in the merged company.
Tesla's approval threshold requires 50% of all issued shares to vote in favor; abstentions count as opposition, not a simple majority of voting shares. SpaceX's Q3 revenue was $14.58 billion, net profit $4.4 billion, capital expenditure $19.6 billion. The core conflict lies in valuation discount and financing responsibility. $BTC $ETH #SpaceX业绩大增，与特斯拉合并能否推进？ Meta has posted a $825 billion bill, causing a double hit to both stocks and bonds in the market.
Regulatory filings submitted by Meta on Thursday reveal future commitments for various leases and contracts totaling about $825 billion, up from $700 billion three months ago.
This consists of three parts: $355.7 billion in operating leases not yet recorded on the balance sheet (data centers and energy infrastructure), $454.5 billion in irrevocable short- and long-term contracts, and $14.7 billion in cloud computing purchase obligations over the next five years.
On Thursday, Meta closed down 6.98% at $648.85. Even harsher was the credit market: Meta’s five-year CDS rose to about 114.79 basis points, a record high. CDS for Oracle, Microsoft, and Broadcom also increased.
I think what’s really being hit isn’t Q3 advertising—advertising actually exceeded expectations—but the "bill" itself: the market is starting to price credit risk on the ledger of AI-fueled borrowing. Observing, not chasing.
Invalidation point: If Meta clearly lowers its capital expenditure cap for 2027, or if CDS falls back and the stock price rallies above $697 with volume, this judgment is void.
Which side do you favor: Is the $825 billion the entry ticket to the AI supercycle, or will the growing ledger eventually blow up?
$META $ORCL $MSFT
#Meta #AIInfrastructure#SK Hynix Q3 earnings report is coming, can HBM4 boost profitability?