Orbit Post Sitemap
$SNDK SanDisk seems ready to start building a position.
This was a casual buy last night.
Placed an order around 1080, hoping for a pullback to catch me.
Short-term resistance is near 1200.
Last week when buying around the 1200 level, I mentioned that SanDisk needs to firmly hold above 1420 to continue opening up upside potential. The resistance at 1420 was not sustained and the price fell back, which was expected.
Currently, the technicals show an oversold condition, but the news has not eliminated the fundamental concern of "price increase slowdown" suppressing valuation.
Why did the stock price plunge after "good performance"?
The real trigger comes from SanDisk's manufacturing partner Kioxia. Kioxia warned that the pace of NAND price increases is sharply slowing — the price increase for the September quarter dropped from a mid-term ~70% to just over 20%, and the next quarter's prices are expected to be roughly flat. The pricing logic for memory stocks trades on the "speed of price increases," not the "price level" itself; a slowdown in price increases alone is enough to overwhelm a strong quarter.
The above is my personal opinion for reference only.#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
Republicans lost in the midterm elections, Tesla and SpaceX plunged sharply, what expectations is the market trading on?
The Democrats swept both chambers, and Elon Musk's $445 million political donations seem to have gone down the drain. He even joked on X, "The laser didn’t work this time." But the market isn’t joking — Tesla’s after-hours dropped over 3.7%, SpaceX pre-market once fell as much as 6%, and Nasdaq 100 futures followed, dropping more than 2%.
What’s being traded isn’t "Democrats won," but the "Musk premium" being stripped away. With Democrats controlling Congress, two direct pressures arise: first, the potential Tesla-SpaceX merger faces greater congressional resistance; second, the new Texas governor has explicitly paused new data center permits, putting SpaceX and Tesla’s AI infrastructure expansion in Texas under fire.
One detail worth watching: Tesla options implied volatility percentile is only 2.79%, meaning the market hasn’t priced in this political risk at all. The stock is falling, but options remain calm, indicating most haven’t yet reacted.
In short: money isn’t indiscriminately dumping tech stocks; it’s repricing the risk of being "too tightly tied to politics." Nvidia and CoreWeave’s declines are emotional contagion, but Tesla and SpaceX are the real focus.Markets often experience a recovery after midterm elections, with a rebound in the 12 months following the election being the norm. $BTC $ETH $ZEC The voting day on November 3, 2026, has passed, but counting is still ongoing. Prediction markets cited by Axios, such as Kalshi, show about a 70% probability of the Democrats sweeping both chambers, with expectations repeatedly mentioned of the House gaining over 230 seats and the Senate netting 4 additional seats. Alaska remains a key variable. However, these numbers can still change; leading on election night does not equal the final result. 2022 is an example. Before the election, many models and betting markets predicted the Republicans would gain a net 13 to 30 seats in the House, but Ballotpedia's final count was only a net gain of 9 seats. In the Senate, the Democrats held the majority 51 to 49, with Pennsylvania flipping and Georgia going to a runoff. Assuming the Democrats take both chambers, Trump could face congressional constraints similar to those Biden encountered after the midterms. Executive orders can bypass some legislation, but the debt ceiling cannot be avoided. The 2023 standoff between McCarthy and the White House serves as a reference. The debt issue will also affect market sentiment. On the day the U.S. credit rating was downgraded in 2011, gold prices rose more than 3% in a single day. Bitcoin often falls alongside risk assets during crisis phases and may only rebound once the situation eases. As for the stock market, midterm years typically bottom out, and a rebound in the 12 months after the election is the historical average, not a promise for this year's market. Rather than betting early on election outcomes, it may be more worthwhile to focus on how the market digests uncertainty and when the debt ceiling will be back on the table. The numbers on election night will change; historical averages remind us to keep a longer-term perspective. #USOne message, 1,083 accounts, 11,700 posts, 20.93 million exposures.
From 05:00 on October 30 to 20:00 on November 2, what Binance recorded was not scattered complaints but a coordinated public opinion campaign. The most significant numbers come at the end: among the 641 most active accounts, 452 are correlated and 444 fall within the same connected network. This is not many people individually dissatisfied; it is hundreds of nodes speaking according to the same script.
Looking deeper: out of 11,700 posts, 3,354 were identified as misinformation. Misinformation does not aim to convince you; it aims to "look like many people are talking." The 20.93 million exposures are its KPI—not to make you believe, but to make you repeatedly see it, causing you to mistake repetition for consensus.
The cost structure has also changed. Previously, short selling required borrowing coins, posting margin, and risking liquidation; now, a matrix of accounts plus some promotion can create the illusion that "everyone is running." Part of $BNB's price has never been based on fundamentals but on repeatedly told stories.
So what should you look at? Look on-chain, look at net inflows and outflows, and see if the depth of $BTC and $ETH has truly thinned. Public opinion can change how fast you press buttons, but it cannot change the balances in blocks.
Worth considering: when "many people talking" can be bought in bulk, the basis for judgment should shift from "how many people said it" to "who can provide evidence."US spot BTC ETFs continued net outflows on Monday, but redemptions have concentrated from multiple funds last Friday to IBIT. The scope of capital pressure has narrowed, but new buying remains thin and is still insufficient to support a strong recovery.
Both Farside and TFTC recorded: on November 2, IBIT had a net outflow of $405.3 million, with only FBTC showing a small net inflow, and the net amounts of other funds were zero. Although the total outflow decreased compared to last Friday, IBIT's own outflow actually expanded. The current improvement is mainly due to other funds stopping net outflows, rather than a broad round of capital replenishment.
Tonight, BTC is around 77,400 USDT on OKX, with a slight decline over the rolling 24 hours. For this recovery, a more convincing change would be sustained net inflows across multiple funds; relying solely on a decrease in total outflows still shows insufficient buying power. Single-day subscriptions and redemptions do not represent the attitude of all institutions. Circle is about to release its earnings report. Does issuing more stablecoins mean earning more profits?
Circle's core profit logic is actually very simple and straightforward — earning interest on USDC reserves.
They convert dollars into USDC, and $CRCL uses that money to buy short-term U.S. Treasury bonds or deposit it in banks.
The larger the USDC issuance, the bigger the reserve pool, and naturally, the more interest income can be earned.
While it's great during a rate hike cycle, once the Federal Reserve cuts rates, even if the USDC scale remains unchanged, interest income shrinks directly.
Earning more doesn't mean more money in the pocket; the money is actually shared out.
When looking at the earnings report, you can't just look at total revenue; you have to see how much is left in the end!
USDC's ability to support such a large scale relies heavily on channels like Coinbase to attract customers. Circle must share a large portion of interest income with these partners, which is a significant amount.
Plus compliance, technical maintenance, and ecosystem subsidies, often the scale grows but the final net profit is not much.
So, can it continue to deliver profits in the future?
What the market cares about is not how long it can earn interest income, but whether it can grow and stabilize its business!
With regulatory policies becoming clearer worldwide, many traditional large institutions and cross-border trade have started to dare to use USDC for settlement, which is a solid real demand.
Ultimately, what determines its success is whether it can expand its business into payment gateway services, software fees, and other non-interest income, no longer relying solely on the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Don't think that just because the Democratic Party took control of both chambers, the dawn has come. This is a classic pump-and-dump based on buying expectations and selling facts; political bickering and regulatory tightening are just beginning, and the full realization of positive news is actually a signal of a market shift.
Looking at $BTC, the big coin, election expectations have long been overextended. Historical patterns show that after every midterm election, BTC first undergoes a violent shakeout to the bottom before rebounding. Now with the two chambers and the White House balancing each other, subsequent bills will all get stuck, creating huge policy uncertainty. Even a slight market stir will cause bulls to panic sell, and new lows could be hit at any time.
Looking at $ETH, Ethereum is a weak follower. With the Democrats controlling both chambers, digital asset regulation is very likely to tighten, casting serious doubt on the effectiveness of the industry's previous lobbying efforts that spent over $200 million. Capital fears uncertainty the most; Ethereum's ecosystem already lacks new narratives, and once the regulatory shadow falls, the decline will definitely amplify, with no decent resistance.
From a macro perspective, the split Congress means large-scale fiscal stimulus is completely off the table. Don't treat the election as a free pass; the real threats are non-farm payrolls and inflation data. The high-interest environment hasn't changed at all, and the market is about to face the test of data surprises.
Looking at $XAUT, gold is the real hard currency. The White House is constrained by Congress, fiscal policy is blocked, and with sticky inflation, safe-haven funds can only flow into gold. Central bank buying underneath is firmly supporting it, and its resilience absolutely outperforms the crypto space.
In summary, the election results are the fuse for a market shift. Heavy resistance lies above; blindly chasing highs is a death sentence. Protect your positions and guard against a series of sharp drops. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Democrats sweep Congress, crypto legislation is dead, but crypto is not dead
Senate Democrats hold 52 seats, flipping six red states. Warren will lead the Senate Banking Committee, Waters will lead the House Financial Services Committee.
1. The CLARITY Act is entering its death countdown.
Procedural vote on September 15 was 49-50, 11 votes short. Now it can't even get scheduled. TD Cowen's judgment: it won't pass within two years.
2. Subpoena power changes hands, this is the easiest to overlook.
Waters' committee has subpoena power, can investigate Trump's family's crypto projects and CZ's pardon. Negative headlines will continue for the next two years, specifically targeting "politically connected coins."
But three things remain unchanged:
· Spot ETFs cannot be withdrawn.
· Regulatory rules continue. SEC's crypto asset rules and CFTC's exchange framework are within existing institutional authority and do not require Congress approval.
· Legislative freeze for two years, but the industry will not freeze for two years.
The market has long priced in this news:
Bloomberg surveyed 301 traders, median BTC price under Democratic sweep scenario at year-end is $76,450. Current price is $77,345. The price is standing at this valuation, no second shock expected.
So don't use the election as a reason to open positions.
What to really watch are these three things:
11/6 October Nonfarm Payrolls
11/11 MSCI decision on whether to exclude MSTR and other Bitcoin reserve companies
12/9 Federal Reserve decisionVotes haven't been fully counted yet, but the money has already been cast. The results of the U.S. midterm elections are coming in one after another, with the Democrats taking the House of Representatives. Prediction markets have lowered the probability of flipping both chambers to 77%. The most immediate reaction isn't the stock market, but the U.S. dollar—it was sold off in a full round; the Nasdaq dropped as much as 1.5% intraday, with AI stocks taking the biggest hit first. Why cut AI first? Because this election had a very specific card: data centers. The Democrats advocate hitting the brakes, and the governors' races in Texas and Ohio revolved around data centers; meanwhile, tech companies were deeply tied to the Republicans in the last election cycle and now face regulation, investigations, and fines. This isn't about morality; it's about vote counting arithmetic. The transmission chain is clear: the dollar has increasingly mirrored AI capital expenditures over the past six months—money flowing into data centers buys dollars, money flowing out sells dollars. So the phrase "dump the dollar" is tailwind for risk assets. U.S. Treasury yields remain stubbornly above 4.9%, with the risk-free end not easing, but the marginal direction of the dollar has already changed—this is what makes this round different from previous ones. Crypto is on the tailwind side. Data as of this round: Bitcoin up 2.3% in 24 hours back to 78,352, Ethereum up 2.5%, total liquidation about $324 million, with longs at $189 million and shorts at $135 million. Note this structure: both sides are hitting liquidation, leverage has just been cleared once, and it's not a one-sided crowded trade. I'll say something counterintuitive: short-term tailwind, mid-term headwind—both statements hold true simultaneously. If the Ohio Senate seat really flips, next year the national$PEPE
With no new fundamental news, how should we analyze PEPE's volatility?
This type of asset relies more on liquidity, attention, and holding structure; price increases alone are hard to prove as value growth. After industry risk events, weak trading depth is especially worth noting.
If spot trading is dispersed and bid-ask spreads remain stable, demand can better absorb volatility; if trading is concentrated, leverage expands, and depth decreases, I would lower my confidence in the sustainability of the market trend.After the breakdown, don't just focus on the price
$BTC dipped to $75,690, $ETH touched $2,225, and both previous lows were breached simultaneously. But more critical than the price is that positions are "changing hands."
In the past 24 hours, BTC perpetual open interest (OI) dropped about 2.1%; over the past 7 days, ETH perpetual OI fell about 6.2%, and the total market OI declined in sync, indicating that old leverage is still exiting. On the other hand, OKX coin-margined OI slightly increased from a low level: BTC about +0.4%, ETH about +0.8%. This is not a simple clearing out; some are deleveraging while others are placing new bets. Whether the new positions are bottom-fishing longs or trend-following shorts cannot be determined yet.
More caution is needed regarding funding rates: BTC remains near +0.01%, ETH has cooled down but is still significantly above the 7-day average. Price breakdown and total position decline, yet the remaining long costs are not low, indicating an unstable structure.
There are two key points to watch going forward: first, whether BTC’s $75,690 can form effective support; second, whether ETH can reclaim $2,236. If prices weaken further and total market OI shifts from declining to rising, it can be considered that new directional funds have officially taken over. At the current stage, the first round of deleveraging may have ended, but the second round of the long-short battle is just beginning.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 Leverage has been cleared out, but the fee rate hasn't dropped yet, and the $SOL short position at 123 dollars is being targeted
$BTC leverage cleared, bulls still holding strong
BTC is at 76,640, hitting a new monthly low. The total open interest across the network has dropped to a 12-month low, with leverage basically wiped out. However, the funding rate remains positive at +0.0100%, meaning bulls are still paying to hold their positions. Chips have been cleared, but costs haven't decreased; this is not a healthy bottom.
$ETH 100x staking lock-up, but ETFs are rapidly withdrawing
ETH is at 2,292, with resistance between 2,298 and 2,341 at the upper Bollinger Band. There are 1.37 million tokens queued for staking on-chain, with only 13,000 exiting, a ratio of 100:1. However, ETFs have had net outflows for six consecutive days, with a single-day withdrawal of 140 million. 2,246 is the critical line; if broken, look to 2,284 as the liquidation zone for 55.5 million long positions.
$SOL 250,000 short tokens openly placed at 123
SOL is near 91, having lost previous support. Bullish leverage has mostly been washed out, and spot funds are providing a bottom. But there is a large on-chain short position that hasn't been withdrawn; the liquidation line for 250,000 $SOL is firmly stuck at 123 dollars. If the main force pulls it up a bit, it will trigger liquidations, and passive buy orders will enter directly.
Summary: Watch when BTC funding rate admits defeat and turns negative, ETH defends 2,246, and whether spot support for SOL can push shorts toward 123.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ #Anthropic潜在IPO投资者建议估值降至1.5万亿美元
"Anthropic Valuation Cut"
Institutions suggest lowering Anthropic's valuation to between $1.5 trillion and $1.6 trillion, below the expected $2 trillion.
Q3 revenue was $16.956 billion, down 47% quarter-over-quarter, with a single-quarter loss of $567 million.
Computing power commitments reached $895.4 billion, with $69.8 billion expiring within a year; the next financial report milestone is critical. $BTC $BTC This rebound wave: the market has priced in in advance that the Democratic Party is very likely to take control of Congress. It is expected that the subsequent aggressive crypto-friendly bills will slow down, but the negative impact has already been fully priced in, following the "bad news is fully out" trading logic. At the same time, it moves in tandem with the Nasdaq and tech risk assets, showing a strong correlation between BTC and the US stock market.
$ETH #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #BTC spot ETF funds fluctuate, can the market buying hold steady?
Wednesday noon BTC: This morning's post was still around 77,000, dipped to about 75,700 between 10–11 am, then lifted back in the afternoon, current price about 78,400, roughly +1450 compared to this morning. F&G 34 (Fear). The latest complete ETF day is still 11/02: US spot BTC net outflow about 398.6 million; election window in the background, not mainly riding it.
The simulated observation position is still open, this morning's low didn't bet on a crash through, afternoon lift back didn't add leverage betting on holding overnight high. Reminder 78414 / 78414 / 78066 — intraday high, current price, overnight high. The above are observation points/planned reminders, not trade calls.
In the afternoon, lifting back from this morning's low near the overnight high, which side are you on: A take profits near the high first, or B keep holding to see if it can hold? Comment A or B. $BTC 📉The three giants have fallen three times in a row! Bears are celebrating wildly, how far can this drop go?
$BTC $ETH $SOL
The three giants of the crypto world have experienced three consecutive declines
This wave is another wild celebration for the bears
$BTC
Directly fell below 77,000 USD
Currently still continuing to probe lower
Still some distance from the previously mentioned 75,000
But according to the current trend
There is a chance to directly break below 74,000 USD
$ETH
Smaller in size than BTC
The decline in this round is relatively small
The stepped downward trend is very clear
Any rebound is easily crushed back down
$SOL
Once a strong coin
The trend is gradually weakening
Most likely to first break below 90, then look at 85
Only after stabilizing is there a chance to rebound near 95
Interest rate hike expectations are repeatedly tugging
The market continues to be under pressure, with no end in sight
If you found this review useful, please give a like!
Press 1 if you are optimistic about further declines and breakdowns, press 2 if you are waiting for stabilization and rebound
This is only a market review and does not constitute investment advice
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ Uniswap officially named Robinhood Chain as the fastest chain to reach $100 billion in trading volume. Robinhood Crypto retweeted the confirmation on the same day, stating that the figure is the fastest ever, not just media hype.
This is cumulative volume, not a single-day spike. The rapid surge is likely due to meme and gambler traffic piling up during the new chain's cold start; protocol fees and UNI holder dividends may not keep pace. The milestone proves liquidity can rise but does not guarantee the moat is secure. Arbitrum's official account also congratulated, indicating competitors acknowledge this achievement.
Don't directly convert the speed record into a valuation re-rating. If within two weeks the chain's weekly Uniswap volume falls below half the peak, or spot price drops below 6.8 and fails to recover, treat this as a cold start report card. Snapshot around 16:06 Beijing time, Binance spot about $7.49, 24h approximately +6.9%.
$UNI
#UNI #Uniswap #cryptocurrency #Báo cáo tài chính của Circle sắp ra mắt, liệu sự tăng trưởng của stablecoin có thể hiện thực hóa lợi nhuận không? The common people voted with their feet; inflation ultimately sent the Democratic Party into Congress. The midterm election results are out, with the Democrats sweeping both chambers, and Trump directly hobbling. Those previously staunchly supportive states flipped blue, basically because supermarket discount goods were snapped up, and oil prices rose higher than milk—people just couldn't make ends meet, so naturally, they voted out the ruling party.
At the moment the results came out, BTC got scared and even dropped below $76,000 because the market feared the Democrats would crack down hard on the crypto industry. But within a few hours, it made a V-shaped recovery back above $78,000. The reason is simple: no matter who wins, once the boot drops, the biggest uncertainty is gone. Capital fears bad news less than it fears not knowing what pitfalls lie ahead.
In the short term, don’t expect the Democrats to hand out sweeteners to the market; those folks have never been friendly to cryptocurrencies, and tighter regulation is a real pressure. But fortunately, the White House is still in Trump's hands; he has veto power to block outrageous bills and can push administrative orders, so there won’t be a catastrophic policy reversal. Both sides will keep tugging, and crypto legislation will most likely turn into a long tug-of-war.
The real key to BTC’s fate has never been who wins the election, but whether the Federal Reserve and the market have enough money. Inflation is still high now, so the Fed can’t immediately turn to easing; if the dollar strengthens, BTC will still have to stay down.
In short, the election just blew away the political fog; what we should focus on next are inflation data and interest rate trends. Whether $78,000 can hold is ten thousand times more important than who won the midterms.The rally looks impressive, but liquidation data suggests a different story.
$BTC saw $33.74M in short liquidations compared to just $6.7M in longs, pointing to a short squeeze rather than strong organic buying pressure.
$ETH followed the same trend, with $34.87M in short positions wiped out. Forced buying fueled the upside, but genuine spot demand is still unconfirmed.
$CORE highlighted how quickly momentum can reverse, with both long and short positions getting liquidated. $ADA ADA holds a market cap of 7 billion USD, but the daily on-chain fees are only $1,400.
Even the turnover of a small village shop is higher.
The community constantly brags about the technology, but on-chain, no one is actually spending Gas to use it.
It's all just existing old holders holding on hard.
Without a real ecosystem to support it, this kind of purely faith-driven inflated market cap can't withstand even a little selling pressure at the bottom.
#ADA
$ADA
👇It's often said that platform tokens rely on burning to support their valuation, but when I actually looked into the cash flows of BNB, HYPE, and OKB, I found they are quite different.
$BNB is the one with real income. Q3 network revenue was $54.2 million, a quarter-on-quarter increase of 54%, but daily active addresses dropped 14% to 2.1 million. Tokenized stock trading volume was $25.6 billion, which looks large, but 80% is concentrated in just one product, QQQB. There were 37 burns totaling 1.646 million tokens, supply compressed to 131.5 million, with a target of 100 million. Although it makes money, the revenue structure is too thin, and currently the burn narrative is insufficient to push the token price up.
$HYPE has the strongest cash flow, with cumulative revenue of $1.34 billion, 97% of fees flowing back to AF buybacks, having already bought $1.26 billion worth of chips. Annualized buyback is 7.5%, P/E ratio is 13, the model is clean. But the unlock on November 6, which will bring about $760 million selling pressure at current prices, is looming overhead, so it's best to wait and see before it lands.
$OKB is the most boring, with no protocol revenue, no L1 narrative, fixed supply of 21 million tokens, and 0% inflation over 90 days. It's a pure deflationary shadow, but in a flat market, it actually highlights value.
Each deflation narrative has its own storyline. Whether there will be sustained buying support really depends on real cash flow and selling pressure.$CORE still needs to play with big coins; at least big coins have inflows. Look at this thing, outflows for 100 days and 90 days, inflows are pitifully low, maybe just 100 million outflow, 5 million inflow This surge looks more like a short squeeze rather than a genuine buy-side takeover. Are you seeing a signal of chasing the rally, or is it just another FOMO driven by liquidation data? When reviewing the liquidation charts over the weekend, my first reaction was: this doesn't look like incremental capital entering the market, but rather a forced liquidation chain reaction. On the BTC side, about $33.74 million in shorts were liquidated, while longs only accounted for $6.7 million, a disparity that's quite striking. ETH follows almost the same script, with $34.87 million in shorts wiped out. To put it plainly: the price was pushed up by "forced buybacks," not by willing buyers establishing positions here. This brings up an easily overlooked point: when the rise is mainly driven by short covering, the "fuel" for the rally is actually one-time. Once shorts are covered, the momentum stops. What truly determines whether the rally can continue is whether spot buyers are willing to take over at this level, and that has not yet been confirmed. So at this stage, I prefer to define it as a mix of game-playing and position washing, not a clean window for chasing the rally. CORE's price action is a good reminder: both longs and shorts were liquidated, indicating that the rhythm can switch very quickly — one moment it's a short squeeze, the next it could reverse to liquidate those chasing the highs. Under this structure, altcoin sentiment elasticity will be amplified, rising sharply but also pulling back decisively. Risk appetite seems to be warming up, but the foundation is unstable, more like emotions temporarily ignited by derivatives leverage. Of course, a bullish path exists: if spot trading volume continues to expand after the squeeze ends, it indicates real demand taking over, then this wave will notWaiting for the wind is not as good as lying flat first (￣▽￣)ノ
Today, queues at polling stations across the US made me question life, and the results won't be slowly revealed until early Wednesday morning. At times like this, the best move is actually—doing nothing. (:з」∠)
$TRUMP fell the hardest, dropping six points and wiping out all the positions built before the election. It’s the most sensitive to political outcomes; whoever wins could amplify volatility. I didn’t move a single share; touching it before the results is basically gambling with life (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
$XRP is relatively stable, even slightly up. It depends on who controls the regulatory framework and whether the congressional balance changes—these directly determine the pace of progress. I’m holding my long-term position; that’s where it should be ٩(๑•̀ω•́๑)۶
$DOGE is weak in the middle, following the market’s slow decline with no independent story. Meme coins only follow sentiment during event weeks, don’t expect it to move first. If you want to add positions, wait for the results first (￣▽￣)ゞ
The market before the results is the fairest: no one knows the answer, so no one should move. Waiting for the wind is not as good as lying flat first~ (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $ETH $BTC Is this major rally in mainstream coins a rebound recovery or a bull trap???
The bottom rebound and this wave of gains are mainly because the Democrats took control of both houses, removing the negative overhang. The US stock market's strong rebound even led to a V-shaped recovery for the bottomless pit that is SanDisk. Ultimately, the election is just a short-term fluctuation; the real direction is still determined by the Federal Reserve's interest rates and inflation data. Volatility will still amplify as stimulus is digested, so do not blindly chase orders at this position. Control your position size and wait for a clear stabilization signal before taking action. $SNDK
Mainstream coins have fully absorbed the negative news and have surged in a deep V shape. The key level of the market structure is pushing back; with such gains pre-market, there might still be action before the US stock market opens tonight. Remember not to panic or take chances.
Follow Kaige for continuous in-depth market analysis and capital game logic to help you identify opportunities and avoid risks! #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #AMD数据中心收入近翻倍，营收及指引均超预期 Calculate it: for every 1% adverse movement in the nominal position, about one-quarter of the theoretical initial margin will be consumed. This rate of amplified profit and loss is the starting point for how I read this trade.
Core Trader 74 (0x68cb35…02d1e) opened a long ETH position this time with 25x leverage, holding 89.5446 ETH, with a nominal value of approximately $205,500, at a reference price of $2295.5.
① Dividing the nominal value by 25, the theoretical initial margin is about $8,222, excluding fees. I do not interpret the $205,500 nominal value as the amount of principal invested; nominal exposure and principal are accounted separately.
② Roughly calculating 1 ÷ 25, an adverse movement of about 4% approaches the theoretical liquidation distance, corresponding to a reference price drop of about $92. This is not the actual liquidation price; margin mode, additional funding, and maintenance margin requirements will affect the result, but the buffer is clearly thin.
③ The $2295.5 reference price is just a material reference and cannot be directly taken as the average price of the entire position. If this is an add-on, the original average price will affect the overall risk; with current information insufficient, I will not judge the quality of the entry position based on this.
My judgment is that the price tolerance requirement for this long position is more important to watch than the nominal amount. Even if the direction is correct, it may not withstand adverse fluctuations during the process; going forward, I want to observe whether the average price and leverage change together, and I won’t take a large position to bolster my judgment.#On-chain tokenized stock scale hits a new high, traditional financial institutions accelerate layout Sony earnings preview
The whale long-short ratio gap widens, how to identify short-term signals?
31.9% of the whale long-short ratio is on SOL, shorts have already taken floating profits; this signal can explain the oscillation pressure in the 15-minute cycle but cannot confirm a downward breakout. ETH's 24.02% long-short ratio corresponds to the 2291 price level, both longs and shorts are at a loss; it only indicates a stalemate, not an imminent directional choice.
BTC's whale long-short ratio is 20.01%, price 77825, indicator divergence has appeared. Holding this position maintains the original long structure; once broken, the likelihood of a pullback will significantly increase.
Open the position list, check the stop-loss points of short-term positions, and confirm they match your own risk tolerance.
$SOL $ETH $BTC #BTC spot ETF capital outflow, corporate treasury accumulation slows down
$BTC I am temporarily watching. The price and active buy-sell orders have not given a consistent direction yet.
Analysis: BTC faces resistance at the upper cost line of short-term holders, with a pullback observation range between $72,300 and $75,700.
OKX BTC perpetual contracts have had nearly 4 full hours with active buying at 52.9%, open interest increased by 5.34%, and the current funding rate is 0.0088%. Buying and selling forces are close, and changes in open interest do not equal net capital inflow.
The lowest point of the previous 20 hourly candles is 75,690.1, the highest is 78,170.2; only a volume breakout close has directional significance.
Market analysis, for reference onlyUnderstand the current BTC with three numbers
First number: $78,155.90. This is the current price of BTC, 24h +0.91%, last 7 days -3.92%, last 30 days -8.65%. The data speaks: short-term shows signs of stabilization, but the last 30 days still indicate a deep correction.
Second number: 15%. This is BTC's position percentile within the last 30-day range. 15% means it is currently in the lower part of the range, valuation pressure has mostly been released, and the margin of safety is increasing.
Third number: $76,807 ~ $85,561. This is the current key operating range—support at $76,807 below, resistance at $85,561 above. As long as the price stays within this range, it is consolidating; a breakout above $85,561 targets $87,273, a breakdown below $76,807 targets $74,502.
Connecting the three numbers, the conclusion is clear: BTC is currently in a "low-level consolidation" phase, direction unclear, but downside risk is narrowing.
Strategy: sell high and buy low within the range, respond with light positions; increase activity after a volume breakout above $85,561 or breakdown below $76,807.
Numbers don't lie, but they can change. Data is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice.Conclusion first: $CC current price is 0.0994, up 5.8% in 24 hours. On October 30, I wrote about it here with the title "The day institutional narrative was loudest, but the coin price was green," at that time it was 0.0958. What really changed: today the SEC recognized Canton Coin as a digital commodity and granted a conditional minting exemption—this is the first time the institutional narrative has regulatory endorsement.
But the three numbers in the wallet are more important.
① Trading volume is still thin. Perpetual 24-hour volume is 2.74 million USD, spot only 1.21 million, 2.3 times difference. The narrative is institutional, but the chips are still retail.
② Funding rate flipped. On November 3 it was -0.0218% (shorts paying longs), today at 12:00 it turned to +0.005% floor price, longs are no longer squeezed.
③ Open interest only rose 2.7%, from 2.629 million to 2.701 million USD. Market cap is 3.97 billion USD, Canton chain TVL is only 13.78 million, accounting for 0.35% of market cap. On-chain business hasn't started yet.
So this rally, leverage hasn't caught up, my previous conclusion needs revision: it's not "$CC is bought by retail," but "$CC still has no on-chain business to buy." It is still 48.8% away from ATH.
Do you believe this is the start of a revaluation, or just another narrative pulse? $CC The President of Iran stated that the Supreme Leader has granted the government certain authority to advance negotiations. This news is worth noting because how far the negotiation representatives can go will affect whether the plan has a chance to continue moving forward.
However, the scope of the authorization has not been fully disclosed, so it cannot be directly interpreted as all key conditions having been approved.
Follow-up news on November 3 still shows that there are differences between the US and Iran regarding the agreement. Diplomatic channels continue to operate, and military tensions have not disappeared. After a previous sharp drop, oil prices have rebounded, showing how sensitive the market is to these changes.
I am more inclined to view this authorization as progress in the negotiation conditions. It may reduce some internal coordination resistance, but it remains to be seen how the US will respond and whether the arrangements can truly be implemented.
The reopening of the Strait involves transportation security and also the trust of both parties in the commitments. Who takes action first and how the other side verifies it—any ambiguity could slow the process.
Repeatedly reviewing this news is indeed exhausting. Every time there is a positive statement, prices move up for a while, only to find that some conditions are still unresolved.
Therefore, I will raise the confirmation standard: both sides must explicitly agree on the same arrangement before seeing if execution begins. Authorization can bring opportunities, but the safe passage of oil tankers is the ultimate result the market needs.
#伊朗授权政府谈判，霍尔木兹重开能否提速？ Kamino is a major lending protocol on the Solana network with a TVL of about $1.34 billion and active loans around $862 million. The $KMNO token, however, has zero holders revenue. We analyze exactly where the disconnect lies between the protocol's income and the token's value, and what is happening with vesting. Context: Kamino combines three areas: lending, liquidity management, and leveraged strategies. This is not a niche play: the product is in demand by Solana users who need loans and position automation in pools. But the designA few days ago, there was a new project I chose not to touch, but it doubled in a few minutes. Honestly, it hurts not to be involved.
But when I checked the contract, I saw a line: the team can open the pool early at any time, and the opening price is roughly the minting cost.
This means whether it goes up or not depends entirely on the team's mood and the external hype, which I can't judge. So I set a rule for myself: only consider projects where "the pool automatically opens when full" is hardcoded. Earning less once is better than getting hit by an "early pool opening" or the pool never opening and the team running away.
Do you check contract permissions before joining new projects? Or do you just jump in based on hype?
Just a personal note, not investment advice. #NewProjectReview #Web3Security #Cryptocurrency
$BTC Coins that have been recovered but not distributed yet are not considered recovered
$CORE had 68.15 million coins recovered, and the price dropped over 6% that day.
Where did this money come from:
A hard fork moved the attacker’s coins into a recovery address.
The transaction was not rolled back, and the attack record remains on the chain.
Who is placing orders here:
The 68.15 million coins are just sitting in the recovery address, not distributed to the victims.
In other words, this batch of coins can turn into sell orders at any time.
Looking further ahead, the opposing side is waiting for this.
Since the coins haven’t been distributed, the selling pressure hasn’t materialized yet.
The price drop is an early calculation of this.
Only when the recovery address starts transferring out does it truly begin.
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 $CORE #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？
USDC's scale is growing, but profits may not necessarily follow. In Q3, the circulating volume was about $74.58 billion, showing moderate growth; analysts expect revenue around $789 million, but EPS is only about $0.38, clearly under pressure. The core issue lies in distribution costs: for every $1 of income Circle earns, about 59 cents go to partners, leaving only about 7 cents net retention, with Coinbase taking the largest share. So don't just focus on circulation volume; what really matters is whether reserve yields and RLDC (revenue after distribution costs) improve. The scale story sounds good, but realizing profits still depends on interest rates and the revenue-sharing ledger.I think it's quite understandable why sports are so popular in on-chain prediction markets. Matches come with their own fan base, the rules are familiar, so you don't have to spend a lot of time studying project documents first. Buying tokens also lets you discuss valuations and narratives, while sports betting is simply about asking who will win, making the entry barrier much lower. But odds aren't just about calculating strength; home team bias and star player popularity can also factor in. When I watch these discussions, I often see them drift off-topic—just a moment ago they were presenting data, and suddenly they're defending the team's history.After the change in the congressional landscape, large-scale fiscal stimulus is hindered, and the Trump-style tax cut/spending agenda is temporarily shelved.
📉 Risk assets: Regulatory pressure on the tech/AI sector increases, facing short-term pressure; however, the presidential veto power can still block major legislation such as tax hikes, with mid-term historical trends leaning upward.
🥇 Gold: Fiscal expansion is limited → US dollar and US Treasury yields decline; policy confrontations intensify → safe-haven demand rises. Dual support strengthens gold prices.
⚔️ Geopolitics: Executive power still dominates foreign and military affairs, and presidents facing domestic obstacles tend to pursue diplomatic breakthroughs, increasing uncertainty rather than reducing it.
In short: Fiscal policy is locked down, diplomacy remains free; gold benefits, geopolitical risks persist.#Anthropic潜在IPO投资者建议估值降至1.5万亿美元
Anthropic's valuation cut from $2 trillion to $1.5 trillion—does this cool down the AI frenzy?
Looking at Anthropic's latest S-1/A prospectus data, Q3 single-quarter revenue was $16.96 billion, a year-over-year increase of over 11 times. However, revenue growth quarter-over-quarter sharply dropped from 144% to 47%, and due to high-priced spot computing power constraints, it returned to a loss of $567 million. Along with nearly $900 billion in long-term computing power leases, institutional investors pressing pause is completely reasonable.
High marginal cost of computing power
Q3 computing power accounted for 58% of revenue. The larger the model scale, the more expensive the marginal cost to maintain performance, making it extremely difficult in the short term to run a sound standalone economic model.
Risk prevention for bottom-line guarantees
$69.8 billion in computing power bills must be paid in the next year. If Q4 annualized revenue does not meet expectations, the huge commitments will directly turn into debt burdens.
Subsequent valuation is likely to be set between $1.5 trillion and $1.6 trillion. The biggest winners in capital expenditure remain infrastructure providers such as NVIDIA $NVDA, Amazon $AMZN, and Google $GOOGL. The industry is fully entering a new phase of refined competition on computing power conversion efficiency.
DYOR #CFTC首次放行美国个股永续期货 Analyst target price spread 7 times, where is the core anchor point of Circle's financial report?
Many people use revenue growth rate to price, which is a common misinterpretation. The full-year revenue forecast is raised by 10%, but the EPS forecast falls to 1.15, directly halving from last year's 2.35, with institutional disagreement stuck on the profit side.
The financial report will be released in 12 hours, with a 52-week high of 140, and the current price has already significantly retraced. The change in USDC scale is the key; only if it turns positive month-over-month will revenue growth have sustained support. This judgment will become invalid when the financial report is officially released.
Open the position page, calculate the proportion of this asset in your total funds, and confirm whether it exceeds your pre-set position limit.
$BTC $ETH $SOL Non-farm payroll data is about to ignite the market! What BTC fears most might be that both good news and bad news turn into bearish factors.
The U.S. economy is caught in an awkward situation: the October ISM Manufacturing PMI rose to 55.5, marking the 10th consecutive month of expansion, but the price index remains high at 75.2; September core PCE year-on-year rose to 3.1%, with inflation rebounding, making it difficult for the Fed to easily pivot to easing. Market bets on a December rate hike once rose to about 84.6%.
Next, the non-farm payrolls will be the key variable. Strong employment could further push up rate hike expectations; a significant deterioration in employment would amplify recession concerns. For BTC, what truly matters is not the number of new jobs itself, but how the data changes rate expectations, the dollar, and U.S. Treasury yields.
Therefore, it is unwise to bet one-sidedly before the data release. Focus on whether non-farm payrolls, unemployment rate, and wage growth move in the same direction, then see if BTC can increase volume and choose a direction. During this macro test, controlling leverage and being wary of two-way spikes is more important than guessing the answer in advance. $BTC #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $SNDK This trade has only one thing right: I didn’t short at the spike on 11/2, nor did I freeze at the bottom afraid to catch the fall.
I was watching closely the night the earnings report exploded but it still dropped. The market is pricing in "NAND price peak," I remember that line from Nomura—but oversold is oversold, 1067 is the needle tip, 1070 the lower Bollinger band, 1060 the yearly moving average convergence of three layers, and on 1H with shrinking volume I placed a 75x long at 1079.8 with a stop loss at 1058. Today the sector recovered, sellers held back before the split, pushing it to 1128.6, I got the first leg right.
The foolish part is the half that’s already showing: looking at 338%, my mind is already drawing "if it breaks 1150, look at 1250." That’s a sickness. 1150 is the trapped wall from the crazy money in August, one bullish candle can’t break through it, and betting on a "reversal" with 75x leverage is like trying to melt ice with a match.
Tonight the rules are reset: ① Lock in the breakeven line, never move it down; ② 1150 must hold with volume for a full day, or no adding positions; ③ If it falls back to 1100 and can’t hold, exit immediately, no catching a second knife.
Climbing out of the pit is luck, daring to stop at the wall is progress. I’ve done half of that today, will continue tomorrow. $BTC $ETH #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 BTC is battling around the 50-week moving average
A new variable has emerged in the market
News has surfaced that Trump is internally assessing the worst-case scenario for the midterm elections
There is a possibility that the Democratic Party could take control of both the House and Senate
The previous pricing basis for this round of crypto assets
largely bet on the Republicans maintaining control of Congress
which would lead to favorable crypto regulatory policies
Once control of both chambers switches
policy advancement will be directly hindered
and positive expectations will quickly be discounted
Currently, market volatility is not severe
Funds have not yet started large-scale panic selling
but this has become a key variable hanging over the market
Future prices will continue to swing back and forth with election expectations#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 📂 20U Real Account Record 114
💰 Principal: 20U
📉 This trade's profit: Currently at a floating loss
✅ Cumulative earnings: About 0U
📌 Current position: $UNITREE short position
You reminded me about the 0.77% fee. I recalculated this trade, and after finishing, I felt a chill down my spine.
0.77% is the 4-hour rate, not daily. On Binance, the current fee rate for UNITREE perpetual contracts is about -0.7775% per 4 hours.
Applied to my 20U account, this number looks even more glaring. Even if the short position has only a few hundred U nominal value, the daily fees deducted represent a percentage-level loss relative to the 20U principal. If the direction is right, maybe a little profit; but if the direction grinds for two days, the principal is first heavily eaten by the fees.
And the short squeeze structure is still in place. In the past 12 hours, UNITREE had $1,928,400 in liquidations across the network.
A-share Yushu rose more than 3% today.
So I reconsidered this trade. The short logic hasn't changed: Yushu's 505x P/E ratio, 260.4 billion market cap, G1 commercialization in early stages—these are facts. But the 0.77% fee means the position itself is bleeding. Using 20U principal to bear an annualized 1200% holding cost, time is not on my side.
Either wait for the fee to converge and the short squeeze to weaken before entering, or reduce the position to a very small size and only bet on a brief price inflection. Continuing to "hold and wait for direction" like before, 20U won't last a few days October's $141M in Solana stablecoin-card spending is notable because it points to payments use moving beyond transfers. But KAST and Rain supplied about 93% of activity, so the growth is still highly concentrated. Active users, repeat payment frequency, and retained balances will show whether this is durable adoption.
#SolanaCardSpending141M The hacker who stole 6.3 billion from Binance is desperately trying to convert the stolen funds into Bitcoin.
What he can move now are 970,000 stolen SOL tokens.
The conversion method is quite convoluted: first convert to stablecoins, then transfer to Ethereum to exchange for ETH, and finally use THORChain to convert to Bitcoin.
Four steps across three chains, and in the fastest case, $46 million was converted within an hour.
Why Bitcoin?
Because the Bitcoin pool is the deepest, it can absorb the volume globally, and once converted to Bitcoin, no one can freeze it.
Coins keep changing hands, but with every step, the ledger records another transaction.
But he seems to have forgotten one thing: the ledger cannot be erased.
Tracking companies are watching the live stream in real time,
and the FBI is applying for freezes along the route one by one. The frozen 2.85 billion came from this process.
The more frequently he converts, the faster the remaining funds get frozen.
If these coins are ever sold on exchanges in the future, it will be ironclad evidence.
The Bitcoin he ends up with is actually "money with a name".
It seems that successfully stealing the funds is less than half the battle; the real headache is laundering and cashing out cleanly.Iran delays escalation, but Congress changes hands: Which is riskier, BTC or ETH?
The US midterm elections and the situation in Iran are simultaneously influencing the market. Previously, the market was worried about an escalation of military actions after the election, but Trump then signaled a continuation of negotiations, easing geopolitical risk premiums. However, what truly affects the crypto industry's midterm expectations is that with the Democrats taking control of both houses of Congress, regulatory battles may enter a new phase.
The GENIUS Act has become law and will not automatically expire due to the election; the CLARITY Act failed to advance in the Senate procedural vote in September by 50 to 49, making its passage in 2026 very difficult. The Democrats have gained more powers for hearings, investigations, and subpoenas rather than directly rewriting existing laws.
BTC is mainly driven by US dollar liquidity, ETF funds, and institutional allocation, making it relatively more resilient but not immune to declines; ETH and the DeFi ecosystem are more sensitive to regulatory frameworks, and policy uncertainty may suppress valuation flexibility. The focus going forward will be on regulatory investigations, ETF net flows, and US Treasury yields. Don't mistake geopolitical easing for an all-around positive, nor equate regulatory deadlock simply with a bearish outlook for BTC.
$BTC #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ It seems necessary to pay more attention to the opportunities on Robinhood Chain
- Backed by Robinhood, known for retail investor trading, as a traditional broker aiming to continuously gain Crypto trading share and convert traditional users, exclusive asset listings are essential
- In the Q3 earnings season, management mentioned that the growth of Chain and its associated ecosystem, as well as Robinhood Wallet, exceeded expectations, and there will be more momentum to promote Robinhood Chain going forward
- Pairing with stock tokens in the pool might also be considered a slight liquidity innovation, with fee sharing turning stock tokens into another form of "dividends." This gameplay originated on Robinhood Chain. The current Crypto main theme is the major integration with TradFi, betting on a second wave$PUMP
Pump.fun opened a channel today, allowing NEAR ecosystem tokens to be traded directly on it without cross-chain. Such product moves usually go unnoticed.
The price is being generous though, opening at 0.003948 and now at 0.004402, +11.5%, close to the 24h high of 0.004436. The 1H trading volume ranges from 1.6 million to 2.09 million contracts per hour, very stable, no particularly explosive spikes.
Holdings are at $25.56 million. When I wrote about it around 3 AM, it was $25.57 million, basically unchanged after more than ten hours. The fee rate is 0.005%, only half the benchmark, very low. OKX spot 24h volume is only 9.4 million, and perpetual holdings are nearly three times that.
Price rose by 10%, leverage hasn’t moved, the buying is spot. I initially judged it as pulse buying, not continuous buying, but it kept grinding up, that was a strong hit to my face.
I won’t add positions at this level now. If chasing, wait for it to pull back to 0.0041, which is the starting point of this four-hour rise; if it loses that, consider the rise never happened.
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ The real pressure on BTC may not be the election results, but the reshuffling of regulatory expectations!
The biggest suspense of the U.S. midterm elections is fading. The latest reports show that the Democratic Party has won control of both the House and Senate. This means that over the next two years, the White House will face stronger congressional checks on legislation and appointments, but it does not mean that U.S. crypto policy will immediately shift completely.
What truly deserves attention is the CLARITY Act. The bill failed to advance in a Senate procedural vote in September by 50 to 49, falling 10 votes short of the 60 needed. The leadership of committees, agenda setting, and bipartisan negotiations in the new Congress will determine whether the bill can be restarted.
In the short term, the political outcome may cause emotional fluctuations; in the medium term, regulatory uncertainty may raise compliance costs for the crypto industry, with trading platforms, stablecoins, and some altcoins facing more direct policy pressure. BTC is also unlikely to be completely unaffected, but its trend will also depend on ETF funds, dollar liquidity, and U.S. Treasury yields.
My view is: the election results are already revealed, and what the market will trade next is the ability to deliver on policies. Don’t rush to equate the Democratic victory with a guaranteed BTC drop; what really needs to be observed is whether ETF funds continue to flow out and how prices react after regulatory news is announced. Politics sets expectations, but capital decides the market. $BTC #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？