Orbit Post Sitemap
$XRP
Someone has brought up again that "November is XRP month," citing a historical average increase of 80.2%. I used to buy into this too, until I counted the median myself — negative 10%.
No need for me to say which few times pulled the average up; veteran players remember. Eight out of ten times it’s a slow decline or dead silence, one explosive surge drags the ten-year average up to 80%. Using the mean to hype a month is like counting lottery wins as salary.
Testing doesn’t even support this slogan. OKX spot at 1.2477, 24-hour open 1.2638, low 1.2287, down a bit, Binance at 1.2474 consistent. Fee rate -0.003%, basically flat with a slight loss, OI under 100 million USD. The order book looks like this, nothing to do with a "month."
I’m not saying XRP is no good. Recently, those with trust licenses and similar licenses are real, the compliance path is being paved. Just don’t use statistical traps to boost your confidence; when the market really comes, it’s the money in the order book that counts, not the average from ten years ago.
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 The most frustrating thing is not losing, but constantly waiting for a "I didn't see it wrong." Ansem talks about short-term risk control: when the market doesn't move as expected for a long time, even if the stop loss hasn't been triggered, the logic should be re-examined.
I think the key is to prevent confirmation bias: traders may mistake waiting for patience out of fear of admitting they're wrong; onlookers tend to interpret "exiting early" as bearish, turning risk control discussions into an echo chamber of fear.
I also need to reflect on whether what I insist on is logic or just an unwillingness to have my judgment overturned. 🫠$BTC
I usually treat miners liquidating as noise, but this time I took a closer look. Bitdeer sold 265.5 BTC this week, dropping their holdings straight to zero—Wu Jihan's mining company sold off and didn’t replenish, just left it like that.
Coincidentally, the price didn’t cooperate either. Actual OKX spot price is 77254, starting at 78616 24 hours ago, lowest at 76265, down less than 2%. Binance is at 77260, matching up. The fee rate is still a positive 0.01%, longs are still paying, and the open interest of 26.7 billion USD hasn’t shrunk much.
Here’s the interesting part. Miners are natural sellers; their salary is electricity cost, so when the coin price drops to a certain point, they have to dump coins to get cash, which is nothing new. But usually, after selling, miners hold back waiting for the halving event; it’s rare to see zero holdings overnight. Whether they really don’t see a good outlook or are just tight on cash, I don’t know. I lean toward the latter—if it were true panic, a 2% drop wouldn’t look like this.
Anyway, I categorize this as "not a bottom but not a top either." I don’t watch miners’ wallets; I watch for when they start buying back.
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 BTC｜Thoughts for October 31 Today
This wave of BTC has fallen from 84,875 down to a low of 76,270, with multiple previous support levels consecutively broken, and the overall structure has clearly weakened.
Currently, the price is oscillating at a low level. Although there has been some rebound, the key resistance above has not yet been reclaimed.
My judgment is: the rebound does not yet indicate a reversal; today, the priority remains to consider shorting on the rebound.
Shorting range: 77,700–78,200
Stop loss: above 78,800
Targets: 76,500, 75,800
After this decline, it is not suitable to blindly chase shorts at low levels. Focus on waiting for the rebound to reach the resistance area; if it cannot rise or lacks support, then consider positioning.
If the price strongly holds above 78,800, the original bearish view becomes invalid.
Do not guess the bottom, do not chase orders, wait for the position to appear before taking action. $BTC $ETH $SOL #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 The most outrageous after-sales for short-term trading: they said it was a "lightning battle" when placing the order, but there was no movement for a long time. The customer service then automatically changed the explanation to "ancestral craftsmanship, slow work yields fine results." I think the trading logic shouldn't enjoy this kind of free rescheduling.
Ansem said that short-term risk control shouldn't just focus on price and stop-loss points; if the market doesn't move as expected for a long time, even if the stop-loss isn't triggered, it should be reassessed. I agree, but the key is not to set an alarm to urge yourself to exit, but to prevent secretly changing the script: if the catalyst that short-term judgment relies on doesn't take effect for a long time, the original reason needs to be re-evidenced; the price not hitting the stop-loss only means the price boundary hasn't been broken, it doesn't mean the judgment is still valid.
My review question is: if you only see this chart now, can you still write the original set of reasons? If the market delays fulfillment, do you stand by "requiring the original logic to be re-evidenced," or "keep waiting as long as the stop-loss isn't broken"? In this debate, calling in "long-term optimism" to save the day is forbidden 😂$XAUT has a signal that is easily overshadowed by market sentiment: recently, the 10-year US Treasury yield has fallen below 5%, with funds flowing into the bond market. But unusually, both gold and Bitcoin are weakening simultaneously.
Rising bonds, falling gold, and declining BTC—this combination is not a traditional safe-haven scenario. True safe-haven trades see funds flowing into gold. What we are seeing now looks more like a market-wide deleveraging: funds are indiscriminately withdrawing, holders are selling various assets to cover margin calls, without time to pick targets.
In this environment, avoid rushing to bottom-fish. During liquidity tightening phases, assets have no absolute safety floor; many sales are not bearish bets on the market but forced liquidations. Wait for this round of fund withdrawal to end before discussing the bottom. #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 BTC last night at 02:00 had a 720,000-contract sell-off, pushing 77135 down to 76260, a drop of 537 points, with 1347 contracts per point. Then it climbed back 341 points over nine hours, using 1.29 million contracts, 3792 contracts per point—climbing back cost 2.8 times more than the drop.
The most significant volume was at 23:00 with 1.03 million contracts, reaching 78070 but closing at 77570, an upper shadow of 500 points, the only time someone was willing to push it up, then withdrew.
Current price 77230, MA20 77160, 70 points above the moving average line, 24h -1.68%.
$BTC
At 11:00, a bearish candle with 135,000 contracts pushed back to 77107; at 12:00, 140,000 contracts reclaimed 77138; at 13:00, only 65,000 contracts reached 77211. There is buying interest, but only recognizing the 77100 area.
At 15:00 European session and 21:30 US stock market, before this, 77230 is the midpoint price, not an attitude.
If the 1H pullback to 77120~77150 does not break (closing with a lower shadow bullish candle), go long, stop loss at 76950, target 77500, risk-reward ratio 2.0.
If volume breaks below 76950, do not trade, wait for 76260.
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)Binance is suspected of being hacked by North Korean hackers, losing about $6.3 billion in assets, with over $3 billion frozen. BTC plunged waterfall-style from 81,953 to 76,270, currently weakly consolidating near 77,000, barely holding the weekly 21 EMA and the 365-day moving average (around 77,000) defense line. The entire network saw liquidations of $1.1–1.5 billion in 24 hours, with bulls dominating the main force; leverage has completed a round of forced liquidation. However, a critical split has appeared in the capital flow: BTC spot ETFs had a net outflow of $643 million on the day, the largest single-day outflow since June 25, ending four consecutive days of inflows; meanwhile, a newly created giant whale wallet received 1,900 BTC (about $148 million) from Galaxy Digital. There is a potential positive variable in the market: after Binance uses its own funds to cover losses, it will need to repurchase about $1.4–3.3 billion in assets on the spot market in the future, effectively a passive forced buy order.
ETH's structure is more fragile than BTC's. The stolen stablecoins were forcibly exchanged for ETH by hackers at any cost, creating a distorted local buy order, which quickly turned into heavy selling pressure. ETH fell below 2,200, and spot ETFs continue to bleed. 2,100 is the weekly lifeline for ETH; losing it will directly open the downside space toward 1,850.
Liquidity is scarce over the weekend, and with the monthly close approaching, it is highly likely to be a low-volume bottoming rather than a trend reversal. Monday's direction depends on two observation points: whether a secondary run on withdrawals occurs after Binance's withdrawal channel is restored, and whether BTC can form an effective weekly close above 75,800. Apple will release its quarterly earnings report after the market closes on November 2.
I judge that this quarter is likely to slightly exceed expectations, but what really determines the stock price movement is not the quarterly numbers themselves, but the outlook for the holiday season.
The market currently generally expects EPS to be around $1.98, revenue over $113 billion, a year-on-year increase close to 10%, which falls right within the company's own guidance range of 9% to 11%. Apple has almost always beaten expectations in recent quarters, so continuing this trend is not surprising.
The problem is, beating expectations does not necessarily mean the stock price will rise.
After the last quarter's earnings report, the stock price clearly pulled back, indicating that investors care more about the future.
The real key this quarter is the guidance for the December holiday season.
The iPhone 18 series and the foldable Duo have already been released. Questions will be repeatedly asked about whether supply is sufficient, whether gross margins can be maintained after rising component costs, and whether the highly profitable services business can continue to contribute. If the holiday season guidance only shows low single-digit growth or if gross margins appear to be under pressure, even if the quarterly numbers look good, the stock price can easily be hit.
The current stock price level is not low, and the valuation is not cheap. Options have already priced in about a 4% volatility.
My advice is:
This quarter's earnings report is unlikely to be too bad, but don't rush to chase the price higher. It's safer to wait for the after-hours guidance before taking action.
If the holiday season guidance is strong and gross margins are fine, consider buying on dips; if the guidance is cautious, then wait and watch or hedge with a light position. $AAPL #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 $BTW This long-short ratio made me think there would be a sharp drop followed by a strong rebound, but it just kept falling. Missed the chance, what a pity. Looking for another opportunity to buy in.
Retail long-short ratio: 0.64 (extremely bearish).
Whale count long-short ratio: 0.52 (extremely bearish). Whale position long-short ratio: 1.12 (neutral).
Fundamentals are weak: DefiLlama data shows Bitway Earn's TVL dropped 56.2% in 30 days, currently about $36.44 million. Platform protocol revenue is only a few tens of thousands of dollars in 30 days, yet it corresponds to a previously released market value as high as $18 billion. The narrative can't support the valuation, while unlocking is actually increasing supply.
Whale behavior: On-chain monitoring at Gate Square shows whale sell pressure at 95%, buy pressure at 0%, indicating a "full distribution" state. This starkly contrasts with the illusion of whales "supporting longs" on OKX—whales are selling on the spot market while supporting longs on the futures side, harvesting profits from both ends.
$BTC $ETH #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 $BEAT Although Audition will unlock 17.63M BEAR tomorrow, I still don't recommend heavy positions at the moment.
Everyone knows that the dog whale will pump before unlocking to sell off. It has already surged once before. Many people naturally think it's absolutely fine to short at this time, but this kind of mid-level market on the eve of unlocking is the most dangerous. It's definitely bearish, but the most dangerous scenario is the dog whale violently pumping before the waterfall drop to shake out shorts and simultaneously drag longs down, achieving a dual long-short take.
Avoid heavy positions to ensure your position can withstand the dog whale's violent pump. Those seeking stability can short at midnight or when it rebounds to around 0.1-0.11. Entering at the current price of 0.096 is also possible, but start light and keep room for adding positions.
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 $WLD WLD has recently dropped more than 20%, which is not entirely due to "high valuation" issues, but more like: supply pressure + whale/team-related addresses transferring to exchanges + AI risk appetite decline + overall market deleveraging combined causing the drop.
Main reasons for the recent decline
Reason Current Impact Explanation
Continuous unlocking and supply dilution High WLD total supply is 10 billion tokens, with new tokens still unlocking daily; although from July 24, 2026, the daily unlocking amount will decrease from about 5.1 million to 2.9 million, supply pressure has not completely disappeared
Whales and related addresses transferring to exchanges Short-term obvious In late October, dormant whales transferred WLD to exchanges, and team-related addresses also recorded token transfers, making the market prone to pre-pricing selling pressure
AI narrative cooling down Medium-term suppression Recently, AI-related risk appetite has declined, and WLD, as an AI concept token, is more easily sold off in sync
Thin order book and poor liquidity Amplifies decline WLD's market cap and depth are limited, large sell orders more easily cause rapid price drops
Valuation expectations still high Long-term factor Even if the price has sharply retreated from the high point, the fully diluted valuation may still reach tens of billions of dollars; if token utility demand is insufficient, valuation pressure will persist
- Price aspect: WLD has retreated more than 90% from the 2024 high, with an absolute price very low. The November 6 jobs report could shift that balance.
Strong employment gives the Fed more room to stay hawkish, while weakness could force markets to reassess how much tightening the economy can absorb.
Until then, BTC may struggle to build momentum. I would rather see how yields and liquidity expectations respond to the data than trade every hawkish headline.
#FedHikeOutlookDivided Binance's $6.3 billion theft case has seen progress in the aftermath, but Bitcoin took another hit early this morning
Brothers, it's been over a day since the hacker incident, there has been progress in the aftermath, but the market hasn't been kind.
Official stance: Funds are being replenished, withdrawals will open soon
Binance confirmed the total impact is about $6.3 billion and has prepared over $6.34 billion of company-owned funds to fully cover it. More than $5 billion worth of corresponding token assets are already in place, covering about 80% of the shortfall, with the remaining 20% being repurchased through market and OTC channels. The withdrawal goal is to resume in phases within 34 to 40 hours. The first snapshot for proof of reserves has been completed, with full results to be announced by Monday (November 2) at the latest. CZ and He Yi have both spoken, with the core message being: user funds are safe, the company will cover the losses itself.
But the market took another plunge early today
BTC tested the bottom twice below 77,000, hitting a low of 76,400. The entire network saw liquidations of $1.5 to $1.65 billion, with long positions making up the vast majority, another round of leveraged longs forcibly removed. Funding rates turned deeply negative, and the fear and greed index remains in the "panic" zone. There are some bottom-fishers, but they dare not go heavy.
How to understand this disconnect
Compensation is in place, that's a fact, but "withdrawals haven't truly reopened" is also a fact. As long as the withdrawal button remains greyed out, the market can't fully believe this matter is behind us. Plus, the probability of a December rate hike is still hovering around 78% to 83%, so the macro side offers no breathing room. Therefore, the market is not moving on "positive recovery."The Fed's language is getting more hawkish, but market pricing is telling a slightly different story.
There is a difference between officials warning about further tightening and the market actually pricing in those moves. That gap matters for risk assets.
For Bitcoin, the immediate problem is liquidity. Higher rate expectations keep capital defensive and make it harder for speculative assets to attract fresh demand.
#FedHikeOutlookDivided Intel fell 22%, it's not that the chips are no longer good
Intel fell 22% after hours.
The reason for the drop is not that its own chips are not selling.
The money was taken by upstream:
Memory prices rose, and PC manufacturers' costs followed.
Costs went up, but machines still have to be sold at a discount.
The drop is downstream:
Storage manufacturers took the profits, and the PC side bears the costs.
The money flow in this chain is reversed.
The 22% figure was made in after-hours trading.
After-hours order books are thin, so prices are easily amplified.
It reflects expectations, not the real transactions of the day.
The memory price increase passed to the PC side, with the whole machine manufacturers' inventory in between.
Inventory hasn't been fully digested, so cost pressure hasn't yet hit the financial statements.
The drop is in expectations, not losses that have already occurred.
#英特尔Q4指引不及预期，股价暴跌近30% $BTC #英特尔Q4指引不及预期，股价暴跌近30% $SNDK
On October 30, the US stock market closed mildly: Dow Jones down 0.23%, S&P 500 down 0.99%, Nasdaq down 1.57%.
The first crack is in the AI narrative: Meta's net profit plummeted 83% to $2.71 billion, its stock price plunged 11.33%, wiping out over $210 billion in market value overnight. The market's patience for "burning cash to drive growth" is running out. The second crack is in the hardware cycle: Intel's Q4 revenue guidance of $15–16 billion is far below the market expectation of $17 billion, with adjusted EPS only 25 cents, less than 60% of the expected 43 cents, causing a 21% plunge after hours; SanDisk's quarterly revenue grew 378% year-over-year with an 85% gross margin, but its Q2 guidance still triggered a "good news sold off" style sell-off, opening down over 8.8%. Intel exposes the collapse in PC demand, while SanDisk raises doubts about the sustainability of storage prices.
Amazon AWS grew 20% and rose over 13% after hours, Apple rose over 4% after hours, providing structural hedges but unable to cover the systemic cracks in the hardware chain. Coupled with Powell's clear statement that "a rate cut in December is not set in stone," the probability of a rate cut has dropped from over 90% to less than 70%, putting pressure on valuations as well.
If there is a high open next Monday, it is more likely to be a high open with low breadth and high volatility—cloud computing/AI application sectors have repair momentum, but the selling pressure on semiconductor hardware, storage chains, and PC industry chains is far from cleared. The risk of chasing hardware gains is significantly greater than chasing software gains. INTC spent eleven hours during the day doing only one thing: narrowing the gap. At 04:00 it surged to 66.02, the highest today, then for the next ten bars not a single one touched 65.47; at 10:00 the four high points were 64.96, 65.15, 65.09, and 64.97, all capped below 65.20. The low only dropped to 64.63 before rising back to 64.92.
Volume also dried up. From 09:00 to 13:00, five bars totaled 59,717 contracts, while at 01:00 a single bar had 97,937 contracts—today’s five hours traded less than last night’s one hour.
Current price is 64.99, MA20 is 65.46, a difference of 0.47.
$INTC
Downside is 0.36 to 64.63, upside requires 1.03 to reach 66.02. With the same amount of money, breaking down costs half as much as breaking up. 24h -8.27%, trend is downward, convergence is accumulating strength, not reversing.
If a 1H bar closes below 64.63 with volume ≥30,000 contracts, short on a rebound between 64.9~65.1, stop loss at 65.60, target 63.29, risk-reward ratio 2.8.
If volume closes above 66.02, admit the mistake and exit.
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)Farewell to the founding team! Core announces the full transition to community autonomy, with Rines and Sedo officially stepping down
Core's official major announcement: the project has officially entered a critical stage of decentralization. Rich Rines and Brendon Sedo, two core early contributors, have stepped down from DAO management positions, marking the transfer of project governance from the original team to the community. This personnel change coincides with the transfer of block production rights to independent validators. Throughout the entire power transition phase, the network has maintained zero downtime and stable operation, validating the on-chain basic operational capabilities. Decentralization has been a core goal since Core's genesis block, and this stepping down event is a landmark step in the gradual decentralization process. Going forward, the community will hold greater influence over major decisions such as ecosystem construction, growth planning, and network development direction. In the coming months, more independent node operators, community-native projects, and Coretoshi community participants will deeply engage in shaping Core's BTCFi ecosystem layout. The market needs to pay attention to a set of contradictory signals: while the decentralization positive announcement was released, South Korea's second-largest exchange Bithumb decided to delist the CORE token due to a previous validator reward anomaly incident, creating a strong counterbalance between liquidity downside and governance upside. From an investment research perspective, a rational judgment is that the core personnel stepping down from the DAO is a significant narrative development but does not mean the founders' influence has completely disappeared. The early token distribution, degree of node decentralization, and effectiveness of community voting implementation are the true hard tests, and one should not be overly optimistic based solely on the announcement.I was stunned when I saw this Reddit candlestick on my feed; the earnings report clearly exceeded expectations, yet the stock price was cut by 29% in one day 😂
At the close of the U.S. stock market on Friday, Reddit dropped about 29.2%, closing near $91.7. This was its worst day since going public in 2024, surpassing the previous record of 21% on July 31. The market cap evaporated by roughly $7 billion in one day, and the stock price returned to its lowest level in over a year.
What’s ridiculous is that this quarter’s report isn’t bad at all. Revenue was $895 million, up 53% year-over-year, with net profit at $283 million—both revenue and profit beat Wall Street expectations. But everyone only focused on two numbers. The Q4 revenue guidance was $1 billion to $1.03 billion, below the market’s expected $1.05 billion. Even more painful, traffic from search engines in October dropped by over 1 million visits per week on average. The company itself said that if this trend continues, daily active users next quarter could drop more than 10% from 130 million.
The CEO’s explanation was straightforward: Google’s AI search delivers answers directly to users, so they’re less inclined to click through. Reddit plans to test requiring login to view posts in some overseas markets first.
The day before, Google’s parent company also fell about 13% in one day. Both the traffic eaters and those being eaten got hit hard; the volatility in the U.S. stock market this week isn’t much different from a dogfight.
For beginners, the advice is to watch more and trade less; when buying crypto, only buy $BTC Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire released SpaceX's financial model: fiscal year 2026 revenue about $51.5 billion, fiscal year 2027 about $270 billion, fiscal year 2028 over $700 billion. When Musk retweeted, he didn't talk about rockets but about computing power—ground computing power is negligible compared to orbital computing power; the monthly deployed orbital computing power is expected to surpass ground computing power by the end of 2028 and far exceed it by 2029.
The curve is striking. From 51.5 to 270 billion is more than five times in two years, then to 700 billion is more than ten times in three years. This slope indicates that what is being sold is not a product but infrastructure being repriced.
Ground computing power has two hard constraints: where the electricity comes from and where the heat goes. In orbit, solar power is continuous, and heat dissipation relies on radiation; the new bottlenecks become launch costs and uplink/downlink bandwidth. So when he says "monthly deployed orbital computing power," he is comparing the speed of new deployment, not cumulative scale.
This has almost no short-term impact on the crypto space. $BTC mining machines won't be launched into space tomorrow, and $ETH validators won't move to low Earth orbit. What is being challenged is a more fundamental assumption: computing power follows electricity prices. Once deployment costs collapse, the geographic arbitrage of mining farms will need to be rewritten.
Going deeper is the architecture. Orbital computing power has higher latency and lower bandwidth than ground data centers, which is unfavorable for low-latency chains but offers space for designs that can tolerate delay. $SOL bets on throughput, $ETH bets on decentralization; who adapts better, no one can answer.$BTC Binance said withdrawals will be gradually resumed on Sunday, and proof of reserves will be issued on Monday.
It sounds like they are reporting a timeline, but on closer inspection, it feels more like seizing the narrative.
After 6.3 billion was drained, the CEO first said the attack was complex and evidence was erased, then immediately followed with "hoping to resume withdrawals within 40 hours," and then "proof of reserves will be announced on Monday." Rumors outside say that most likely company funds have already been used to cover it.
First, they tell you the investigation isn’t complete, then they tell you withdrawals are possible, and finally they tell you to check the accounts on Monday.
User fund security has been redefined—not that the hot wallet wasn’t breached, but that the company can cover it. SAFU is no longer a safe; it has become a PR engine.
Being able to withdraw just means liquidity is back. All evidence has been self-destructed and erased. How can you believe it’s really been cleaned out?
#Binance #CryptoSecurityThe 12 billion dividend comes from selling assets SK Hynix's Q3 financial report hasn't been released yet, but here are two things to note. One is the mass production of HBM4, the other is a special dividend of 12 billion USD. Where does this money come from: It's not earned profit; it comes from selling Kioxia shares. About 20 trillion KRW in gains, 80% of which is used for dividends. Common misunderstanding: This is a one-time asset sale, not something that will happen every year. The unit priMy first reaction upon seeing this message is: this monitoring report cannot directly pass the review. The coder has a bad habit of, when seeing the request volume, first asking whether the requests are valid. 💻
The input is data from DefiLlama: DEX trading volume in the past 24 hours is about $12.5 billion, down 23.5% from the previous day, but up 61.4% from a week ago. The two comparison windows point in opposite directions, drawing a conclusion from a single number easily leads to logical bugs.
My judgment is that this is not enough to conclude a positive outlook for the DEX sector. Volume increase may come from speculation or position shifting, which does not mean users have stayed; if the volume increase is accompanied by larger slippage, then the activity might actually be a cost for ordinary users. This is my speculation; the material has not yet provided transaction quality data.
If it were me, I would supplement with active addresses, slippage, and fees before reviewing. Everyone, please help review: to verify whether this volume increase is effective demand, which item would you prioritize checking? What logic am I missing? The entire network cleared $1.347 billion in 24 hours, with bulls accounting for 86.68% — but the money didn't flee indiscriminately. On the same day, BTC spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $135 million, almost becoming the sole absorber amid panic; meanwhile, ETH spot ETFs had a net outflow of $156 million, bleeding for five consecutive days, with October's cumulative outflow nearing historical extremes.
What changed? The funds aren't exiting but are "picky": pulling back into BTC while leaving ETH behind.
Why is this worth noting? When prices plateau, many think "it's stabilized," but the ETF ledger tells a different story — ETH's selling pressure comes from institutional allocation, not short-term sentiment.
Which observation is more supported? Currently, the evidence favors "risk-averse clustering around BTC" rather than a "full recovery."
Next, focus on two key points: whether BTC ETF absorption can continue, and if ETH ETF outflows show any single-day positive reversal signals. On one side, whales are accumulating ETH during the decline; on the other, institutions are withdrawing via ETFs. Who will blink first? Share in the comments whether you're holding BTC or ETH. $BTC $ETH MSFT's entire daytime trading only managed to push up 0.78 per share. The 222 shares at 10:00 plus the 218 shares at 11:00 lifted the price from 523.78 to 524.56, burning 564 shares per unit. Last night at 21:00, a sell-off of 1767 shares dropped the price by 14.46, burning only 122 shares per unit—enough to push up one unit could smash down four and a half units.
The buying side is not lazy; every 0.1 increment is immediately taken. After 12:00, 18 shares, 5 shares, and 0 shares traded, totaling 23 shares in three hours, fixing the price firmly.
Current price is 524.71, MA20 is 523.91, down only 0.33% in 24h.
$MSFT
It is now 02:00 Eastern Time, seven and a half hours away from 21:30; no one recognizes this price in between. Today's high of 526.35 is only 1.6 higher, but that 1.6 was reached yesterday with 714 shares and immediately given back.
If the 1H candle closes above 526.35 with volume ≥400, pull back to 525.5~525.8 to go long, stop loss at 524.10, target 530.38, risk-reward ratio 3.0.
If it doesn't close above, just wait; don't guess around 524.
(Not investment advice, trade at your own risk)$CAP market cap fully circulating is not even one billion, who would dare to take over when a little unlock happens.$SNDK This time, SNDK is very typical, with 86% of people unanimously bullish, which is a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" scenario after the expected peak.
The AI storage story has not been falsified; the storage demand supporting computing power remains, and the long-term logic is still intact. This is also why funds have continuously pushed it up before. But the biggest short-term problem is the overly strong consensus; when everyone is waiting for a surge, the main funds take the opportunity to realize profits. Additionally, storage is a cyclical sector, and once the price increase pace slows down, it can easily trigger a valuation correction.
After this high consensus bullishness fails, short-term sentiment has already weakened. Next, priority should be given to consolidating and digesting selling pressure; it will be quite difficult to directly push to new highs again.
If you want to play the game:
✅ Conservative approach: wait for a pullback to stabilize and then break through resistance with increased volume before considering going long;
❌ Not recommended to chase highs or bottom-fish now; rebounds after a consensus breakdown are mostly opportunities to reduce positions;
Short selling strategies suit light positions with quick entries and exits, as the storage sector is prone to news disturbances and can easily see a bullish reversal on a single strong candle.Seeing "zero holdings," I first remind myself not to rush into translating it as bearish news. When explaining this kind of information to newcomers, I usually start by distinguishing two concepts: how much was sold in a week is flow; how much remains in hand is stock.
Bitdeer posted a weekly update on X: As of October 30, 265.5 bitcoins were produced this week, all sold, with a net increase of 0, currently holding 0, excluding customer deposits. Calculating with these numbers, 265.5 produced minus 265.5 sold means no new $BTC was retained this week.
📌 My judgment is that this news alone is not enough to constitute strong bearishness. The volume sold this week corresponds to this week's production and should not be read as additional selling of an equal amount of old holdings; without concurrent market transaction volume for comparison, the impact size cannot be judged. Newcomers are most likely to equate "all sold" directly with "bearish," then use it as a basis for shorting. I will continue to observe the production and sales rhythm and not let a striking headline make the judgment for me.#Apple's new CEO receives the first report card for iPhone 18 The broader picture is a market where institutional exposure is being reduced across major assets, but capital isn't leaving every corner of crypto equally.
I'm paying particular attention to whether BTC and ETH can reverse these withdrawals and whether ZEC can sustain its positive flow momentum.
Capital rotation is worth tracking, especially when price action starts telling a different story.
#FedHikeOutlookDivided Conclusion first: 225 million XRP (280 million USD) is locked in three stablecoin loans on Maple, with the earliest maturity on December 4 — both a demand and a looming sell order.
Maple's syrupUSDC and syrupUSDT pools have about 225 million XRP pledged; three principal amounts are 41.6 million USDC (12/4), 55 million USDC (12/12), and 55.2 million USDT (1/15/2027), totaling 151.8 million.
The only DeFi scale on the XRPL chain: DefiLlama shows XRPL's total TVL jumped from 39.4 million on 10/27 to 339 million on 10/28, with Maple accounting for 88%, and the rest only 38 million. The funds are borrowed from Ethereum, collateralized by native XRP.
$XRP current price is 1.2475, 24h -0.76%; perpetual positions at 98.82 million USD, funding rate -0.0032%/8h.
The maturity date is a hard constraint: if renewed, 225 million XRP remains locked; if not, only 38 million other liquidity remains on-chain, so who will take on the 151.8 million principal?
Will you wait until December 4, or act in advance? $XRP ETH smart money position core data analysis, both longs and shorts find this position difficult, check before opening a trade!!!
ETH current price 2242.25, funding rate -0.0109%.
There are 2483 smart money traders in total, nominal long-short ratio 27.90%.
Longs: 878 traders, holding 421.75M, average entry price 2779.83, unrealized loss 101 million, profit ratio 38.83%, heavy pressure from high-level trapped positions.
Shorts: 1605 traders, holding 1.51B, average entry price 2239.12, slight unrealized loss 2.1085 million, profit ratio 58.87%, most short positions still have profit potential.
ETH support: 2170 resistance: 2260, mainly long at support levels.
Market logic
Short positions significantly larger than longs, current price slightly above short average price, shorts slightly retracing. Long trapped positions are heavy, considerable selling pressure above, market follows BTC linkage with oscillation, short-term likely to maintain back-and-forth spikes and shakeouts, no clear one-sided trend yet.
For market review reference only, does not constitute any trading advice #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #加密行业协同守护资产安全 $BTC $ETH $ZEC Stop messing around! See how the real main whales withdraw funds in the crypto circle. Total profit and loss of 220 million U, a crazy 74 million U earned in 7 days, over 10 million U credited in 24 hours, and a 650 million position openly shown to you! This is the real dimensionality reduction strike.
Look at this divine short position: Ethereum opened a short near 100,000 at $2322, 5x full position, currently making nearly 8 million on a single coin! Bitcoin opened a short of 2300 at 76,000, although currently floating a loss of over 2 million, the liquidation price is far at 136,000; Solana shorted nearly 700,000 at $94, also ignoring volatility. Notice? The whales are all short! Why can they sit steadily and fish? Because their capital size is large and leverage is extremely low. Nearly 140 million margin, liquidation price set nine days away, no matter how the spot market spikes, they won't be liquidated. What's more annoying is that just from the funding rates of these three coins, they picked up over 11 million U for free! This is the whale's mindset: not making small short-term profits, but eating the absolute dividends of the trend. When the market fluctuates, retail investors get hit from both long and short sides, but the big players rely on trend layout and low-leverage full positions to secure gains in any condition. If you don't understand the main force's bottom cards, you'll always be a chump. Want to know when this wave of short whales will close their positions? Where is the next key support in the market? Hit follow, join the group on the homepage, I'll lead you to track whale movements in real time, directly copy the big players' bottom card strategies, and get on board early to profit!Harshly criticizing the false prosperity, the real knife is the withdrawal of US capital
Don't be fooled by the sideways consolidation; BTC is currently just barely holding on with existing funds. The culprit behind this drop is not macro data at all, but US institutions frantically draining and retreating.
Look at $BTC, BTC had a net ETF outflow of over 600 million USD in a single day, completely giving back all the inflows from the previous four days. The most fatal detail is that the Coinbase premium index has dropped to its lowest point since November 2022, the time when FTX collapsed. What does this indicate? It means that domestic US buying power has completely died out. Previously, BTC could hold strong only because of US stock funds propping it up; now that Americans are fleeing, hoping Asian retail investors will absorb this massive selling pressure is pure fantasy.
Look at $ETH, Ethereum is always hopeless. Once US capital withdraws, Ethereum, which lacks an independent narrative, reveals its true colors. The ecosystem can't produce anything new, the funding side has no support, and when the market softens, it falls harder than anyone else.
Look at $XAUT, gold is also dragged down by US debt hemorrhaging. With the ten-year yield high, funds are all running to risk-free interest, and the flight to safety funds have been drained causing a stampede. But gold's underlying fundamentals are much more solid than crypto; being hammered into a gold pit in the short term is actually an opportunity. Don't use short-term sentiment to trap long-term logic.
In summary, the current consolidation is just a smokescreen by the main players to cover up capital withdrawal. Without US capital returning, the market can't stabilize at all. Control your hands to protect your principal, wait for this deleveraging wave to fully clear before picking up the bloodied chips. #BTC持续震荡，后续走势受多重因素影响 For this type of security incident, I look at whether the risk and reward are symmetrical. Kintsu restoring the domain pointing is a positive fix, but not enough to justify users taking on connection risks. Fixing quickly and being able to use it with confidence are two different things.
Kintsu stated that the official website domain has been restored and now points to the normal infrastructure, but DNS cache clearing takes time, and some networks may still access the malicious site within the next hour. The official advice is to avoid visiting the site and connecting wallets until a security confirmation notice is issued.
My judgment is: the repair progress means there is a basis for returning to normal, but cache differences mean individual access results cannot represent overall safety. If you just use the site early, the benefit is convenience; if you encounter a malicious page, the potential loss could be on your assets, which is not a favorable risk-reward. I will treat the official security confirmation as the next observation point and not consider the "one hour" as an automatic countdown for clearance.Liquidity Retreat: AI and Crypto Repricing
On October 31, BTC repeatedly contested $77,000, with over 240,000 liquidations in 24 hours and $1.6 billion cleared; Anthropic Pre-IPO contracts plunged more than 7% due to S-1 disclosure. During the liquidity retreat, narrative premiums are being repriced.
$ANTHROPICUSDT: $168.39, -1.08%. Essentially an IPO expectation contract. The S-1 shows a net loss of 80.7 billion and revenue growth slowing to 47%, creating a gap between the 96.5 billion valuation and the 2 trillion narrative, with volatility reflecting pricing battles.
$BTCUSDT: $77,300.8, +0.02%. Just underwent leverage cleansing. High interest rates and U.S. Treasury yields above 5% suppress valuations. Although ETFs have inflows, Coinbase premium has been negative for 19 consecutive days, domestic buying has not returned, only a breather.
$ETHUSDT: $2,242.73, -0.03%. Glamsterdam upgrade delayed, likely missing the upgrade within the year. If Devcon 8 does not clarify the EIP-8037 timeline, $2,000 will be tested.
The market is converging from "narrative premium" to "certainty." Focus on three nodes: Anthropic IPO pricing, whether BTC can hold the $76,000-$77,000 support, and Devcon 8's clarity on ETH upgrades.
#StrategyQ3净利润创单季新高，数字资产收益贡献显著 $NEAR I really have to admire the NEAR project team's tactics.
They forcibly issued $13 million worth of tokens in a month, then only spent $1.9 million on buybacks as a show.
The most outrageous part is that the tokens bought back are actually kept instead of being burned.
This is not deflation at all; it's just like scooping water with a leaking ladle.
The buy orders on the market are so weak, while they keep printing money and siphoning off funds every day.
This pot keeps getting bigger and bigger; the rebounds just provide liquidity to the project team, which simply can't hold up.
#NEAR
$NEAR
👇The funding rate for SOL was -0.0097% in a perpetual contract snapshot taken at 7 AM on October 31, occurring every eight hours, which annualizes to -10.6%. The short side pays the long side. In the same snapshot, accounts holding long positions accounted for 76.1%, while shorts were only 23.9%.
Ethereum's funding rate was even lower at -0.0176%, with long accounts making up 74.3%. Bitcoin's rate remained positive at 0.0100%, with longs at 73.4%. XRP was positive at 0.0033%, with longs at 71.8%.
Looking at liquidations, CoinGlass reported about $82.75 million in SOL liquidations over 24 hours, with the entire market at $1.54 billion. Long positions accounted for 83.8%, involving 237,000 traders. Bitcoin liquidations totaled $498.9 million, and XRP was $38.46 million. During one hour on the night of October 29, SOL alone was liquidated for $46.8 million; by around 8:20 AM Beijing time, long liquidations in that hour had dropped to $12.46 million.
On the CoinGlass page, SOL contracts traded about $11.64 billion in 24 hours, spot about $1.34 billion, nearly nine times difference, with open interest around $5.57 billion. $SOL 【SEC Exemption Order: Targeted Relaxation of Treasury Clearing Requirements in the Repo Market】
On October 30, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an exemption order waiving Treasury clearing requirements for certain "related-party internal transactions and non-U.S. repo transactions." This is a typical "market structure" signal—it doesn't make financial headlines but has a substantial impact on the operating costs of the repo market (a core money market with a scale of several trillion dollars).
The background is the Treasury clearing reform finalized last year: the SEC requires more Treasury transactions to go through central clearing, taking the liquidity crisis of March 2020 as a lesson. This exemption targets two marginal scenarios: repo transactions within financial institution groups and the clearing compliance burden of non-U.S. transactions. By granting exemptions to these two categories, the goal is to reduce the execution frictions of clearing reforms and avoid excessive compliance costs squeezing market liquidity.
The significance of this signal lies not in the immediate moment but in the direction: regulators are dynamically balancing "strengthening clearing safety" and "maintaining market liquidity," and tend to quickly fine-tune after receiving industry feedback. For ordinary investors, it implies the operating costs and resilience of the Treasury market; for those focused on macro content, it serves as a sample of the "regulatory detail flow"—beyond major news, these technical exemptions often reflect the pendulum position of regulatory attitudes earlier.#Federal Reserve officials signal rate hikes, December expectations still divided
🔥The confidence of whales shorting is not just margin! It's the continuous funding fees🔥
$BTC, $ETH, $SOL simultaneously set up short positions
Total position size about 650 million USD
Three positions show profit and loss divergence
But the continuous inflow of funding fees
Has become a strong safety buffer
📊Position breakdown
✅ BTC｜5x full position short
Holding 2319.6 coins
Entry price 76366.1 USD
Unrealized loss 693,100 USD
Funding fee income: 3,375,200 USD
✅ ETH｜5x full position short
Holding 100,000 coins
Entry price 2322.74 USD
Unrealized profit 8,602,800 USD
Funding fee income: 4,332,700 USD
✅ SOL｜7x full position short
Holding 696,100 coins
Unrealized loss 698,400 USD
Funding fee income: 3,899,700 USD
💰Total funding fees exceed 11.6 million USD
Already surpassing the combined unrealized loss of BTC+SOL
⚠️Key risks
Funding fees are not stable income
Rate reversals, price rallies against position, margin pressure
Can change the situation at any time
Today's focus:
Will whales continue to hold this short combination?
Do you think this is a long-term hedge or waiting to trigger the next market move?
Position monitoring record only, not investment advice
#Federal Reserve officials signal rate hikes, December expectations still divided There is an old rule in the crypto market: when the market tightens, what breaks first is trust, not price.
In the past two days, rumors about OKX being hacked have surfaced. The founder, Star, directly denied them, calling it "rumors." He also added: Over the past 13 years, continuous investment has been made in security construction, with technical capabilities, security systems, and practical experience far exceeding external perceptions.
Let's clarify the facts first. Only two things can be confirmed — the rumor exists, and the official denial. There are no screenshots of anomalies on the chain, no addresses showing fund outflows. This is a piece of news that has not been established on a factual level but has already been priced in emotionally.
The mechanism is not hard to understand. Exchanges are the only centralized nodes in the crypto world that require "trust." Their risk does not accumulate slowly but manifests as a bank-run style rush overnight. So the cheapest way to attack an exchange has never been to break its hot wallet but to make enough people believe it has been breached. A zero-cost rumor, paired with a few screenshots, can make some people run first. Those who run do not need evidence, only to see others running.
This is also why clarifications must be quick and must come from the founder personally. Holders of $BTC and $ETH don't feel it deeply; the ones truly affected are assets like $OKB, which are directly tied to the platform's credit.
My judgment: the short-term emotional impact does not constitute a trend reversal. What really needs to be watched is whether anyone continues to sell after the rumor is debunked. If volume falls within a day or two, it means the market has accepted the explanation; if selling pressure instead intensifies, then it is worth being cautious.Up 61.4% compared to a week ago, this figure concerns me more than the single-day drop. DefiLlama's latest stats show that DEX trading volume in the past 24 hours was about $12.5 billion, down 23.5% from the previous day, with top volumes from Uniswap V3, Uniswap V4, and PancakeSwap AMM V3.
If I were to write a strategy, I would first set an observation rule: if daily trading volume drops but remains higher than a week ago, mark it as "heat cooling down, activity still high" rather than directly concluding an on-chain downturn. As a quant newbie, I think this is more reliable than calling it bearish just because of negative numbers 🤖.
The advantage of this rule is that it separates short-term cooling from longer-term activity changes. My judgment is that this data set is better suited for observing trading demand, not for directly judging coin prices. Volume records turnover; speculation and position changes can both contribute to trading, so higher volume does not equal net capital inflow.
The flaw is obvious: if a week ago was a low base, the increase looks more impressive. I will continue to observe whether subsequent volumes can be maintained and whether activity is concentrated in a few trading pairs; these are conditions I want to add, not conclusions already in this info. If you write your own rules, would you add "consecutive days above the previous week" or "more trading pairs increasing volume together"?$PEPE on-chain data is sometimes more inspiring than any motivational speech. When hackers' sell-offs triggered market panic, a whale named "wenyu8888888" did the opposite: took out 2.61 million USDC to buy 297.9 billion $PEPE in the panic sell-off, then transferred it to Gate 20 minutes later, netting a $270,000 profit in 5 hours.
Setting aside the moral controversy, this move taught all retail investors a lesson: in the same crash, some see disaster, others see liquidity. The hackers' sell-off was a zero-cost chip indiscriminate dump, characterized by ending immediately after the dump without continuation. Smart money’s script is always: buy at the panic peak, sell after sentiment recovers, profiting from the spread between panic and calm.
Looking back at the market now, hackers dumped $40 million, and 12 hours later the price rebounded 8%, all confirming the logic behind that $270,000 trade. The market never lacks opportunities; what’s missing is the courage to place buy orders when everyone else is running away.
Of course, I don’t encourage copying his quick in-and-out style—that’s a skillful act, risky and bleeding at the edge, one mistake and you’re wiped out. But his operation at least shows one thing: at the current price level, in the eyes of the most professional funds, panic prices are bargain prices. 今天群里安静得反常，没人说话——这种沉默往往比暴跌本身更值得警惕。$BTC 跌破78000、在77971附近徘徊，日内跌2.51%；$SOL 报97、跌2.81%；$ETH 跌3.80%；$ZEC 只剩0.10%的涨幅，几乎被抹平。😶 但真正刺眼的是仓位数据：一小时内 $BTC 跌1.40%、$ETH 跌0.72%、$SOL 跌1.41%、$ZEC 跌1.22%；放到日线，$ETH 跌5.56%，$SOL 最深跌12.98%，$ZEC 跌3.55%。两个时间维度同步下杀，全网持仓1364.3亿，缩水2.62%。表面看，这是一场全面撤退。 换个角度看，故事完全不同。今天下午期权到期，期权持仓降到331亿，压力反而卸掉一块；机构合约持仓89.2亿，逆势增2.49%——全网在减，它却在加。成交量3437亿，暴增70.56%。没人参与，哪来这种量？🔥 我的判断是：这是去杠杆，不是去本金。恐慌的是仓位，本金还在原地。爆掉的是杠杆，不是信仰。$BTC $ETH $SOL 所以我不急着离场。放量下跌洗的是杠杆，在最低点撤退是最不划算的选择。我在等两个信号：$SOL 重回100，以及期权持仓停止下In the early morning of October 30 Beijing time, Strategy ($MSTR) released its Q3 report. Operating profit was $20.91 billion, which the company said was the largest quarter in history. On the next trading day, MSTR closed at about $130.5, down about 7.8% from $141.62 the previous day. Profit hit a record, but the stock price fell. After reading the financial report, I think the numbers worth looking at are not the largest ones, but the small print below. 1. Where did the $20.9 billion come from? The report is very straightforward: Q3 operating profit was $20.91 billion, of which digital asset gains were exactly $20.91 billion. Software business total revenue was $125.4 million, down 3% year-on-year. In other words, this quarter's profit almost entirely came from fair value changes due to Bitcoin price increases. This is a book gain, not cash received from selling coins or software. The report also includes a comparison: in Q3, MSTR stock price rose 76%, while $BTC rose 43%. When prices change, the book value must be recalculated. The same applies to Q4. 2. Holdings and cost As of October 25, Strategy held 848,517 BTC, a 26% increase year-to-date. Total cost was $64.02 billion, averaging about $75,446 per coin. The company values it at $81,200 per coin as of October 23, with a market value of $68.9 billion. Beijing time today Strategy's Q3 net profit reached approximately $19.53 billion, with a significant contribution from digital asset income. This achievement is eye-catching, but I believe ordinary shareholders should not overlook one line.
Net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders was about $19.12 billion, which reflects the impact of approximately $419.6 million in preferred stock dividends. This does not mean that these profits have been paid out in cash to ordinary shareholders, but it reminds us that the capital structure affects the equity ultimately attributable to ordinary shareholders.
After buying MSTR, what you get is not a BTC position without other claims. Debt, preferred stock, and changes in the number of ordinary shares all need to be considered.
This is also why, even if the company's book profit increases significantly, the stock price performance may still differ from BTC. Investors will also evaluate financing costs, equity distribution, and subsequent capital arrangements.
I acknowledge the improvement this market brings to the financial statements, but I will not solve valuation issues solely based on record net profits.
Especially metrics like coins per share and BTC Yield have their own calculation assumptions and cannot replace a complete asset-liability analysis.
If you like its strategy, that's perfectly fine; but it's worth being a bit more patient when researching. How much the company earned, how much equity corresponds to ordinary shares, and how much the market pays for that equity — all three accounts should be reviewed for a more solid judgment.
#StrategyQ3净利润创单季新高，数字资产收益贡献显著 Over $400 million liquidated in 24 hours, BTC leads a double blow to longs and shorts!
📊 Market Sentiment Overview
The total liquidation across the entire network in the past 24 hours is staggering, with BTC firmly in first place at $205 million (35.1%), followed closely by ETH at nearly $100 million. Notably, precious metals XAU and XAG also saw significant long liquidations, indicating that macro safe-haven assets are experiencing intense volatility.
⚠️ Key Signals:
ZEC Emerges Strongly: During the mainstream coin pullback, ZEC's liquidation volume reached 7.73 million, with short liquidations (4.05 million) slightly exceeding longs. Combined with previous candlestick trends, this suggests that major players are aggressively shaking out short leverage, making subsequent price action worth watching.
SNDK and SOXL: Tokens related to tech stocks suffered heavy long liquidations, hinting at the transmission of sentiment from traditional tech stocks $BTC $SNDK $ZEC The order book was disrupted by the massive options expiration. Today, instead of discussing technical levels, let's talk about who is rebuilding leverage and who is still withdrawing after the options expiration:
$BTC's rebound is weak; after the options expiration, the bulls have not rebuilt confidence. On 10/30, Deribit had 135k BTC expiring, with a notional value of about 11 billion, accounting for 35% of the platform's total open interest.
The next anchor after expiration is the 12/25 expiration (max pain around 75k). The funding rate is +0.0044%, lower than the 30-day average of 0.0052%, so the bulls are barely paying.
The November monthly candle opened at 83,564, with about an 88% probability of closing lower than it opened on the final day. With expectations of a rate hike in December, a bearish monthly close is highly probable.
$ETH has the heaviest leverage and the bears are betting the hardest. Open interest is 42.18 billion, the largest among the three. The spot ETF saw a net outflow of 1.08 billion in October, the largest single-month outflow this year, wiping out the 832 million net inflow in September.
ETH is the most leveraged and the most painful to deleverage among the three brothers; I won't acknowledge a bottom unless it recovers 2200.
$SOL's leverage is withdrawing but the bulls are still betting. Open interest is 8.07 billion; yesterday, OI dropped by 6%, indicating active leverage withdrawal. HIP-3 accounts for 35% of Hyperliquid volume, and on-chain adoption is expanding, so this SOL drop is driven by macro factors; once the market stabilizes, it should lead. #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧
🔥Three major mainstreams simultaneously open shorts! But the whales have not exited yet🔥
$BTC, $ETH, $SOL three short positions
Total scale about 650 million USD
Book profits and losses vary
But one key point is very eye-catching
Funding fees accumulated over 11.6 million USD
Already become an important buffer for this set of positions
🔍Position details
✅ BTC short｜5x full position
Holding 2319.6 BTC
Opening price 76366.1 USD
Unrealized loss 693,100
Funding fee income 3,375,200
✅ ETH short｜5x full position
Holding 100,000 ETH
Opening price 2322.74 USD
Unrealized profit 8,602,800
Funding fee income 4,332,700
✅ SOL short｜7x full position
Holding 696,100 SOL
Opening price 94.3346 USD
Unrealized loss 698,400
Funding fee income 3,899,700
💡Core highlights
ETH contributes the main profit
BTC, SOL slightly unrealized loss
Just covered by funding fees
⚠️Risk reminder
Funding fees will fluctuate with the market
If it continues to rise, shorts will still be under pressure
Cannot judge position safety based on current data alone
Keep watching tonight
Coin trends + funding rate changes
Do you think the whales will continue holding or take the opportunity to adjust positions for hedging?
Position monitoring record only, not investment advice
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧