Orbit Post Sitemap
#MetaQ3AISpendingOutlook
*Expectations:* Revenue ~ *$63.3B - $63.4B*, up ∼24% YoY, EPS around $6.58 / $6.76. Q2 revenue was $60.8B, up 28% YoY as your screen shows.
- *The big story is AI spending:* Capex is expected to more than double to *∼$39.7B - $41.68B* for just this quarter, vs $18.8B a year earlier. Full-year capex guidance is up to ∼$145B. Wait for the midterm election results to make global headlines
Then look for the Trump concept again, the market cap might not be the same as it is now
This time I am betting on two layers of expectations:
First, the Republicans have a chance to take key seats
Second, Trump and crypto-friendly policies will become the focus of market discussion
$BTC $LINK $BNB
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限 $BTC is already above 84K, but I am currently more focused on whether this level can hold on the pullback. Kraken's public quote is about 84.63K, with today's UTC session high at 84.84K; the price strengthening is a fact, but the pullback below the high reminds me that breakout and sustained hold need to be judged separately.
TraderGauls has specified the bullish plan after the breakout and set a stop-loss condition around 82.47K. His distant target remains just an expectation, not a profit automatically realized after the breakout; likewise, this stop-loss distance cannot be directly copied by people with different entry points and risk tolerance.
My view is to first observe whether the area near 84K turns from resistance into support. If after the pullback the close remains above, then continue to evaluate the continuation; if it falls back below and the rebound fails to recover, then cancel this short-term breakout path and do not maintain the original judgment by widening the stop-loss.
Overall, the relatively strong structure is worth tracking, but I will not ignore entry cost just because the price has already risen. The closer to the daily high, the more the invalidation conditions should be prioritized. Without independently verified new catalysts, small coin rotations are temporarily only for observation and are not additionally packaged as project opportunities.
After the breakout, do you prefer to wait for the level to be retested on the pullback, or wait for the high to be reclaimed again? This is just a personal observation and does not constitute investment advice.The dominance of stablecoins USDT+USDC has again reached the important level of 9.099%. The last time we analyzed this metric was on September 23, and at that time it precisely reached 9.099% as resistance, on a rebound. Simultaneously showing a Strong signal of a potential high on the hourly timeframe. This ended with the stablecoin dominance consolidating between the levels of 9.099% and 8.756%, and it only broke upwards during the market correction from October 7. The high of the dominance ultimately was the level of 9.684% on October 15. And this is very characteristic 2. Prediction Market Rule Aspect: Literally "Did Not Meet Threshold (No)" ❌
Although the business performance is outstanding, for the contract settlement of the prediction platform, it only recognizes rigid numerical thresholds.
Consensus threshold set by the platform: $6.31
GAAP EPS officially announced by Meta: $5.75
Because some forecasting platforms did not timely adjust the consensus data for a one-time loss (such as Zacks' previous estimate of $6.54), which raised the statistical benchmark, the fixed threshold for this prediction item was locked at $6.31. Since 5.75 is not "strictly greater than" 6.31, this item can only be settled as No under the rules. Iran's Foreign Minister says the "seven-day plan" is still on the table: the Strait opens on the sixth day, negotiations on the seventh. But the Israeli Prime Minister has already given the military a different order. The same countdown, two completely opposite scripts—but the market has only priced in one of them. Tehran's proposal is very specific: if the US accepts the conditions, the Strait of Hormuz will resume navigation on the sixth day, and talks will continue on the seventh. The US wants to escalate, maintaining the maritime blockade and oil embargo. On the other side, the Israeli Prime Minister demands the military to "overthrow the Iranian regime," and Iran's new Defense Minister responds with "ready for the fourth round of war." The negotiation table and the battlefield are racing for the same stopwatch. ⏱️ $BTC is stuck near 83,000, with 87,000 above as the sellers' defense line, and 80,000-82,500 below as the last buffer. Brent closed at 108.79, touching 111 intraday. Oil prices have already priced in "uncertainty," but not "certainty." This is what most people overlook: the market is paying for the deadlock but hasn't left enough room for a breakthrough or collapse. Script A: deal is made. The Strait fully reopens, oil prices fall back to 90-95, inflation expectations ease, and the narrative for rate cuts can return. $BTC needs to close above 87,000 on the daily chart to truly open the upward channel. But this is the hardest to quantify probability among the three paths—no one knows whether Washington or Tehran will blink first. Script B: it drags on like this. Hormuz remains half-open, oil prices fluctuate between 103-111, $BTC repeatedly spikes between 80,000-84,000. The worst is not a crash, but sideways movement: two-way leverage is compressed.Should you hold or sell $BTC and $ETH after the latest ETF flow data? Short answer: hold BTC and don't add, and consider trimming ETH. The two are showing clearly different fund flow signals, so they shouldn't be treated the same. BTC: Hold, but don't chase The headline of "continuous net inflows" hides a fragile picture. On October 20, spot BTC ETFs took in $527M, but BlackRock's IBIT alone brought in $665M while Fidelity and Grayscale saw outflows. The next day, total inflows collapsed to juTokens of three exchanges all rise together, but don’t be fooled by the “same increase” 😅
Today $BNB 737.71 (+1.55%), $HYPE 81.23 (+1.46%), $OKB 115.10 (+1.53%) — the gains look like copy-paste, but their fundamentals differ greatly 🧐
BNB’s pool is about $97 billion, daily trading volume only 676 million, holders seem to be hoarding without moving, chips are stable, and volatility is relatively mild 🧱
HYPE is the opposite: leveraged positions are about twice the spot trading volume, many are borrowing to bet, and directions are inconsistent; monthly chart has dropped 14%. With high leverage, gains feel great, but losses can trigger cascading liquidations; a 10% drop in a single day is not surprising ⚠️
OKB is still 55% below last year’s high, but has risen 40% in the past 90 days, showing the best resilience to drawdowns among the three 💪
If you just want to put idle coins on exchanges to earn some yield with less hassle, choose those with low turnover and light leverage; avoid the places where gamblers cluster most 🙂
My view: the biggest risk today is HYPE’s leverage multiple. Where it’s lively, it’s often easiest to get pushed out together 🚪🏃Should you hold or sell $BTC and $ETH after the latest ETF flow data? Short answer: hold BTC and don't add, and consider trimming ETH. The two are showing clearly different fund flow signals, so they shouldn't be treated the same. BTC: Hold, but don't chase The headline of "continuous net inflows" hides a fragile picture. On October 20, spot BTC ETFs took in $527M, but BlackRock's IBIT alone brought in $665M while Fidelity and Grayscale saw outflows. The next day, total inflows collapsed to juJust took a quick look at the order book, the rebound bullish candle of BTC looks quite spirited, but the sentiment on the derivatives side is completely different. Guess who is quietly reducing positions during this rally? The scenario is like this: the price pushed up for a while, but the open interest of perpetual contracts did not expand accordingly, and the funding rate cooled from being overheated back to near neutral, like a lively event that isn't fully seated. Looking at the original data makes it clearer: BTC ETF net inflows dropped from about $527 million on October 19 to $23.16 million on October 20, while ETH ETFs have seen net outflows for five consecutive days. The spot buying is narrowing, and the derivatives side shows no willingness to add leverage. These two factors combined indicate this rebound is more like short covering and short-term sentiment repair rather than new capital entering to build positions. What I personally pay more attention to is the second layer of transmission. The cooling of ETF inflows first affects not the price itself, but the rhythm of market makers and institutional hedging. With thinner marginal buying, order book depth tends to become shallower, so the same sell order causes more noticeable price slippage than in previous weeks. In this environment, BTC's rebound tends to be impulsive, lacking support after surging; ETH's continuous bleeding drags down the risk appetite of the entire altcoin sector, with funds preferring to stay in stablecoins or short-duration strategies rather than rushing into high beta. High volatility assets like SOL are most sensitive to sentiment; once BTC's rebound is invalidated, the pullback tends to be larger. The bullish path is not impossible, such as$BTC Watch: Wall Street Takes Over Crypto, Can the US Stock Bear Market Really Bring Capital Back?
Blockchain.com Co-CEO drops a major viewpoint: Institutional funds have taken over the crypto market, the "crypto winter" is over, and digital assets have received historic bipartisan support in Congress.
At the same time, the platform announced the launch of options trading, positioning it as a liquidity layer for tokenized assets.
Regarding the logic that the US stock bear market promotes capital inflow into crypto, this possibility does exist.
When the valuation bubble of US tech stocks bursts, some funds need to find a new safe haven.
If the US regulatory framework becomes fully clear, the appeal of crypto assets as an independent allocation option will greatly increase.
But significant obstacles remain. The US SEC and CFTC still have more than 30 rules pending implementation, and state licensing barriers are high.
More importantly, in a macro high-interest environment, if US stocks suffer a heavy blow due to recession expectations, crypto, as a high Beta asset, is very likely to have its liquidity drained first to cover US stock margin calls.
The CEO's "end of winter" argument is more of an optimistic call from an institutional standpoint; real large-scale capital inflow still requires the dual resonance of rule implementation and a macro interest rate turning point.$ZEC Observation: Bankless Hypes ZEC Wildly, Grand Narrative Is Just Pie in the Sky
Bankless co-founder David Hoffman is extremely bullish on ZEC, claiming that in this cycle it will reach 10% of BTC's market cap, and in the next cycle, 25%.
Let's do the math: BTC's current market cap is about $1.6 trillion. ZEC's current market cap is about $22 billion.
To reach 10% (about $160 billion), it needs to increase nearly 7 times; to reach 25% (about $400 billion), it needs to surge nearly 18 times.
This is completely an emotion-driven call detached from fundamentals.
Recently, ZEC has strengthened locally due to quantum resistance upgrades and privacy narratives, but KOLs throwing out such extreme expectations are essentially using their influence to create FOMO.
In the current harsh environment of extremely tight macro liquidity and a shrinking, sideways market, there is simply no capital inflow to support a realistic 7 to 18 times expansion.
Grand narratives are often smokescreens for profit-taking distributions, so beware of severe pullbacks after high-level emotional speculation.Conclusion first: $IRYS surged from 0.0130 to 0.0223 (+71%) in 10 hours last night, then retraced itself back to 0.019, a 15% drop from the peak. 24-hour change is +45%, but this is a pump and dump, not a clean trend.
Three numbers to understand the nature of this money:
1. OKX perpetual 24-hour volume is about $28 million, with only $1.43 million in open interest. Turnover is nearly 20 times, indicating short-term chips are rolling out, not long-term positions pushing the price up layer by layer.
2. Funding rates have been continuously negative (-0.0178%, -0.0188%), and the perpetual contract trades at a 0.17% discount to the index price. The coin is rising, but contracts are selling at a discount; the buying pressure mainly comes from off-exchange spot.
3. Market cap is $37 million, FDV is $187 million, with 5x unlocked tokens hanging overhead. Irys is building the first "storage + contract execution integrated" datachain; the narrative is real, but the narrative doesn’t digest dilution for you.
My approach: I don’t chase these 70% spikes within an hour. I’ll wait for it to pull back and stabilize at the 0.0162-0.0168 launch platform, and for funding rates to turn positive before considering.
What do you think? Is this the narrative starting point, or just a pump and dump?#特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 Bro, I’m just putting it in this spot, don’t pull too hard.$DOGE explains several reasons why it can't rise, and in the long term, it might even drop to multiple zeros after the decimal point
1. Permanent inflation dilution, no deflationary burn mechanism: About 5 billion new coins are issued annually, with an annual dilution close to 3%, total supply is unlimited, which dilutes holders' value over time, and there is no code-based burn mechanism to offset selling pressure.
2. Lack of rigid demand scenarios, no intrinsic value: No smart contracts, DeFi ecosystem, or staking rewards; very few merchants accept it for payment; there is no function that requires holding it to use, so its value purely depends on emotional speculation.
3. Value highly depends on a single emotional endorsement, consensus is unsustainable: The market is highly tied to influencer hype, it is a MEME sentiment coin; once the influencer effect fades, funds easily flow out continuously, with no fundamental support.
4. Outdated technology, stagnant iteration, continuously losing funds to new coins: The underlying technology has not had major upgrades for a long time; compared to new Meme coins and public chains, it lacks fresh features, and buying power is constantly taken by new projects.
5. No project team backing or profitable cash flow, it is a game of passing the bag: No operating entity, revenue, or product, no profit buybacks; it can only rely on new funds entering to take over, and when incremental funds dry up, it will continue to decline.
6. The spot ETF (BWOW) has already delisted and liquidated: The US Bitwise Dogecoin ETF BWOW ended trading and entered liquidation, directly losing the compliant institutional buying channel, further narrowing the official channel for institutions to allocate DOGE, putting liquidity under pressure.$BTC Watch: Asian session stubbornly resists Europe's heavy sell-off, BTC pricing power severely fractured
Looking at Galaxy's data, it really makes one feel that the European session is underperforming
Since October, the Asian session has stubbornly pulled out a cumulative return of 3.9%, while the US session barely rose by 1.1%
The European session directly dumped a deep pit of -5.5%, dragging the all-session holding return into negative territory.
The traditional image of Europe's old money has now become the largest short-selling force
The core logic behind this is still macro risk aversion; with rising expectations of a European economic recession combined with the double drain of a high-interest environment, institutional funds are selling off risky assets at any cost to exit.
In contrast, the Asian session, relying on retail sentiment and resilient dip-buying, has stubbornly withstood this wave of sell-off.
This regional capital split directly causes the market to grind back and forth around the 80,000 level
As long as the selling pressure from the European session continues, the market will find it difficult to break out into a smooth one-sided trend
With capital fragmentation and no improvement in the macro environment, this zero-sum game of mutual pocket-picking will continue indefinitely.RWA major infrastructure, who is really profiting?
In the trillion-dollar narrative of RWA, I focus on four core infrastructures: $LINK, $SKY, $ONDO, $INJ.
Considering certainty and token capture ability:
LINK and SKY are giants "collecting tolls," with very deep moats, but their token capture is mediocre;
ONDO and INJ belong to the "asset issuance and settlement layer," with high flexibility, but real demand is still ramping up.
In the major RWA infrastructure, LINK and SKY are the ballast stones, but don't expect them to get rich quickly.
LINK monopolizes oracles and CCIP cross-chain, used by Swift and JPMorgan. Unfortunately, its token capture is too weak; the money accumulated by the protocol to buy LINK yields less than 1% annualized of its market cap, purely relying on institutional narratives to support valuation.
SKY is currently the on-chain central bank, with tokenized fund scale of 4.6 billion, the industry leader, and Q1 revenue exceeding $120 million. But its flaw is that it only uses 5% of profits for permanent burn, so the deflation effect is like squeezing toothpaste.
To bet on incremental growth at the asset issuance end, look at ONDO and INJ.
ONDO is the leader in tokenized government bonds, with assets close to 4 billion. But its tokens are purely governance.
INJ has strong cooperation with Asian institutions, and the community buyback and burn mechanism is also running smoothly. Unfortunately, the protocol's annual revenue is only two to three million dollars.
Summary:
For stability and valuing institutional backing: LINK > SKY
For flexibility and betting on new narratives: INJ > ONDO Don't rush to call a reversal on the rebound rally: first look at the capital flow, then the key levels
BTC has returned near $82,000, ETH has surpassed $2,400, and SOL has broken through $105 — all three screens turning green simultaneously can easily create the illusion that "the market is back." But the more orderly the rebound, the more you need to ask: is this a trend start, or just sentiment running ahead?
The capital side hasn't given the same answer. Recently, BTC and ETH spot ETFs have mainly seen net outflows overall, and SOL-related products have not shown obvious inflows. Prices are moving up, but capital hasn't entered in sync, indicating this is more like a sentiment recovery after overselling rather than a reversal driven by incremental funds. Without capital support, no matter how good the rebound looks, be prepared for it to lose momentum at any time.
Technically, the roles of the three coins are clear: BTC is the gatekeeper, with around $82,300 as the level bulls must hold; if it can't hold, the rebound can only be treated as a pullback. ETH focuses on diffusion; whether $2,420 can be effectively broken will determine if this recovery can spread from BTC to a broader market. SOL looks at resilience; only by holding above $106 will short-term strength be more convincing, otherwise it will likely swing with the overall market.
When the market rises, everyone looks like a trend follower; the real difference is whether key levels hold during pullbacks. For now, don't rush to guess if this is a reversal or a bull trap; first see if the price can confirm at key levels.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $NFLX Negative news: Netflix's "advertising leg" confirmed crippled, the bears have nailed it this time
Look at the odds in this prediction market, it's so real
Yes directly dropped to 22 cents, No surged to 79 cents
Bro's "right side fully loaded" prediction, having a seaside villa is indeed solid.
The market logic is extremely clear. The market simply doesn't buy the Q3 net profit surge of 44% because those are past numbers
What really triggered the panic is that lousy guidance — advertising revenue for 2026 cut directly from 3 billion to 2.7 billion
Advertising is the lifeline for Netflix to maintain its high valuation in the future, and now this leg is completely crippled, directly breaking through the institutions' bottom line.
Looking at NFLX's slight 0.5% drop now, it will most likely open high and close low after the market opens, or even open low and drift down steadily
In the high interest rate environment that is grinding tech stocks into the ground, weak earnings guidance is a death sentence.
The current consensus has completely reversed, the 79 cents No is the result of capital voting with their feet Under the shadowless lamp, the monitor suddenly showed a straight line—not a cardiac arrest, but SpaceX's revenue curve completely reversing the ECG of last year's loss for the same period. Third-quarter revenue reached $14.575 billion, a 161% year-over-year increase, with net profit of $4.404 billion turning positive from a loss. This is not just a simple cardiac stimulant; it is an autonomous circulatory recovery. But surgeons first look at perfusion, not complexion.
The most striking is the revenue structure: AI business at $7.56 billion, surging 830%, surpassing the connectivity business including Starlink at $5.248 billion for the first time; Starlink has 13.6 million consumer users, with connectivity revenue up 69%. This is like a huge collateral circulation suddenly opening, changing the original model of relying on a single heart chamber supplied by satellite internet into a parallel dual-ventricle system. The left heart is computing power, the right heart is connectivity; any obstruction in either outflow tract will reduce overall cardiac output. Starship completed its first revenue-generating mission, deploying 26 V3 satellites, equivalent to completing the first anastomosis under extracorporeal circulation: not only proving the vessel is patent but also that this vessel can bring cash flow.
The linkage to $xPLTR should be like performing a preoperative transesophageal echocardiogram, not just looking at the price guidewire. The surge in SpaceX's AI revenue is the contrast agent: it lets the market see the real demand for enterprise-level computing power, data pipelines, and satellite edge networks, rather than arrhythmias in the conceptual phase. If $xPLTR is treated by capital as a compensatory channel for AI software and data platforms, its short-term heart rate will fluctuate with risk appetite; but its fundamental pathology is not on SpaceX's profit statement, but in its own order quality, customer concentration, valuation preload, and interest rate afterload. The price plunge is just cyanosis of the skin; what really needs checking are oxygen supply, perfusion pressure, and embolism sources.
This data set lowers the noise of "AI demand overheating" by one notch but also exposes a new lesion: revenue heavily skewed toward computing power, capital expenditure like myocardial hypertrophy, initially compensatory but potentially increasing oxygen consumption long-term. Starlink user growth and Starship revenue provide forward blood flow, yet satellite deployment, launch frequency, spectrum, and regulation are all potential small emboli; where they block a coronary artery or market segment, localized infarction occurs. The linkage with $xPLTR is more subtle: it does not directly own Starship nor rely on satellite traffic for revenue, but risk appetite strings together "computing power demand—data platform—enterprise software" into a neural reflex arc. When SpaceX's performance exceeds expectations, the reflex arc excites the target sympathetically; once AI revenue growth slows from 830% to a normal rhythm, the same nerve transmits in reverse, first knocking down valuation, then discussing fundamentals. Clinically, the most dangerous is not tachycardia but sudden cardiac arrest after tachycardia.
My judgment: SpaceX is a successful dual-ventricle assist device turning point; $xPLTR is just the waveform drawn from the same monitoring lead; waveforms can resonate, but myocardium does not share the same coronary arteries because of that. #SpaceXQ3RevenueUp161% Those sanctioned oil tankers drifting on the high seas are not idle assets; they are a batch of structurally capped but fire inspection-failed unfinished buildings. The Energy Minister said they could be acquired, renovated, and re-approved—this is a typical structural reinforcement plan, but once load-bearing walls have been altered, the project is never completed according to the original blueprints.
First, look at the foundation of these "buildings." The return of dozens to hundreds of shipping capacities sounds like new construction area, but the key clause is very strict: no transportation of sanctioned crude oil. Translated into construction terms—you can enter the site to work, but not a single truck of the specified grade of concrete can be touched. What does this mean? It means delivering a frame without a core tube, filled with low-grade infill walls, halving the structural value. The scale and timeline are unclear, equivalent to the construction organization design not yet released, while the general contractor is already announcing the completion date.
Next, look at the diesel line. The Russian side says delivery will be 15 to 20 days after signing, and the U.S. side has exempted some sanctions. This is equivalent to suddenly opening a temporary unloading port in the material supply chain, but the structural calculation book has not been updated—15 to 20 days in energy logistics is a deviation of more than three sea shipping cycles, a hidden risk of foundation backfill soil not being compacted in layers. Whether the diesel supply increase can be transmitted to the end depends on the throughput elasticity of storage and transportation nodes, and the construction quality of that link is never in the news headlines.
Brent closed at 109.55, down 0.28%. This drop in construction terms is called "insufficient stress release." The market digested two supply-side variables with a small bearish candle, what does this indicate? It indicates traders are waiting for the structural acceptance report, not looking at renderings. Oil tanker capacity is the beam of the transportation layer, diesel is the pillar of the energy layer; both components are still in the prefabrication yard, and the on-site assembly node connectors—that is, the certainty of actual delivery—are the key to whether this building can withstand wind loads.
As for the U.S. stock token $xLLY’s market linkage, reading it as a valuation anchor for a project under construction makes it clear: the underlying asset’s cash flow is like the foundation, sanction exemptions are like planning permits, and approval progress is like construction permits. Permits can be reapplied for, but foundation settlement won’t play along. The current status is—the blueprint has just been unveiled, the foundation pit has not been inspected, and the secondary market is already quoting prices for curtain wall units.
What truly determines the quality of this round of supply easing is not the verbal approval of "can return," but the actual man-hours of those dozens to hundreds of ships rust-removing and plate-replacing in dry dock, the logistics node acceptance forms from diesel signing to tank entry, and whether each simplified compliance test will cause structural cracks during later operation.
A project’s long-term value is never written on the renderings but in the acceptance records of concealed works. That record is still buried at the bottom drawer of the approval counter; blueprint reviews haven’t even started yet. #ustankerreturnplan$SNDK This rebound is on shrinking volume, with the US market opening at 1427 with a spike correction
· 15m recent 8 bars average volume 9,185 contracts, compared to previous 8 bars 36,820 contracts = 25%
· 1H: 21:00 crash 258,054 → 22:00 61,855 → 23:00 33,000 → 00:00 only 2,618 (not finished)
· 4H CMF +0.252 indicates inflow, 4H MFI top divergence confirmed, 15m top reversal established for 15 bars
· premium has turned positive +0.026% (only +0.0103% at 22:10) → moving towards your +0.05% premium line
Although price is moving up, volume is shrinking, this is a short squeeze driven rally, feels like chasing shorts? Will it continue to test the bottom?
The tug-of-war band upper edge is 1331.9–1389.1, both ends could be hit.
② How to handle short positions
After surging to 1392–1400 then falling back, 1H close cannot hold above 1392.4, and premium reaches +0.05%
· Entry at 1400
· Stop loss at previous high near 1420 (outside the lower edge of the four-line convergence zone, 1.5×ATR15m)
· Targets 1368.3 → 1346.6 → 1331.9
· From 1396 entry to 1346.6: RR = 2.06
③ Main short entry
1423.9–1433.1 four-line convergence. If it surges here, combined with premium ≥+0.05%, 4H top divergence, and volume with long upper shadow → this is the main shorting zone
· Entry 1425–1432 / Stop loss 1450 / Targets 1390.8 → 1368.3 → 1346.6
· From 1429 entry to 1368.3: RR = 2.2
④ Long positions:
Chase longs: 1H close above 1392.4, and 15m CMF turns positive, and 15m volume returns to 25,000+ → target 1427.3, stop loss 1372
Pullback longs: 1365 / 1360.5 holds, and 15m CMF turns positive → stop loss 1345, target 1427.3
Currently CMF -0.176 still outflowing, not satisfied, no trade
Just watch three numbers: 1389.1 (upper band) / 1368.3 (0.618 support) / whether premium breaks +0.05%.#闪迪存储业务高增长能否延续？ I think the new high in Ethereum staking shouldn't be rushed as a price increase signal. By the end of Q3, about 43.8 million ETH were staked, accounting for approximately 35.9% of the supply, but the yield was suppressed to about 2.63%. Spot price is around $2446 (Beijing 14:35, OKX).#NetflixQ3ProfitBeat Pulled from 1185 to 1340 in one day, I’m not chasing this $ZEC wave yet
The catalyst is real: developers have set the NU7 mainnet activation at block 3,543,405, expected around November 5.
After the upgrade, block time will shrink from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and exchange confirmations for three times will drop from nearly 4 minutes to just over 1 minute.
But the details aren’t that solid.
The foundation’s readiness checklist has only completed 6 out of 12 items, node synchronization issues are still unresolved, and no one can guarantee the date will be on time.
CoinDesk data shows contract holdings rose 24%, but the price only increased 12%, with active sell orders still pushing down; most of the incoming volume is leveraged.
I think there are still two weeks until 11/5, and with such a rushed pump, there’s enough time for several shakeouts in between. Chasing now is just carrying the bags for others.
I’m staying put, waiting to see it hold above 1350 before considering, and if it falls back below 1250, this move is basically over.
Also, if you have coins in the old Sprout privacy pool, remember to move them out before the upgrade; after activation, they can’t be spent.
Are you waiting for the upgrade to land before acting, or getting in now?
$ZEC $XMR $BTC
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限 Late night sudden movement. BTC tested 83500 for the fifth time and finally broke through, reaching a high of 84478, currently around 84500, up 2.5% in 24 hours. ETH has returned above 2500. This rally is driven by three factors: progress in US-Iran talks, oil prices falling from 110, and US stock earnings exceeding expectations, combined with concentrated short covering, with over $500 million in leverage liquidated in 24 hours. But two points to keep in mind: first, this rally happened late at night with average volume; second, the Fed meeting minutes at 2 AM have not been released yet, and New York Fed's Williams just said inflation is still too high, leaning hawkish. The price is now right at the 84300-85000 gap zone, with 85000 being the next tough resistance. The fifth breakthrough and a solid hold are two different things. My discipline remains: do not chase, wait for a pullback to 83500 without breaking to confirm, or a volume-backed close above 85000, otherwise this spike might be a false move again. The 78000 stop-loss order remains in place, waiting for a pullback confirmation signal before deciding whether to exit. $BTC The 84000 barrier finally broke tonight
BTC peaked at 84831, now resting around 84500. ETH, which was previously at the bottom, also gained 3 points tonight, climbing back above 2500. ZEC is even more impressive, rising from 1073 and bouncing nearly 25 points in the past few days, standing at 1337 tonight.
But let me be clear upfront: excitement aside, the night of a breakout is the most likely time to lose money. Of those rushing in during the surge, seven out of ten get stopped out by a pullback.
A true breakout isn’t just the initial push through; it’s whether the price can hold on the pullback afterward. If 84000 turns from resistance into support and doesn’t break on the pullback, then the bulls truly take control. That’s what we’ll be watching closely over the next couple of days.
One more detail: the volume on tonight’s surge wasn’t large, indicating that some of the short sellers’ fuel above has been burned but not completely. The decisive moment will come when volume spikes.
Meanwhile, sellers of liquidity have started moving first. Circle’s Arc mainnet has been live for a month, minting 650 million USDC. Regardless of price fluctuations, runway repairs are underway, showing that more people are lining up to enter.
I’ll say this: if the 84000 support holds over the next couple of days, I’ll come back and brag. If it doesn’t and falls back to 82000, just pretend I never said anything.
What do you all think? Is this a real breakout or a fakeout before a trap?
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限 $BTC $ETH $ZEC #MetaQ3AISpendingOutlook $BTC spot ETF fund inflows have sharply declined, with large single-day entries quickly shrinking, raising serious questions about the market's true absorption capacity.
On October 20, the US BTC spot ETF saw a net inflow of $526.7 million, marking the strongest single-day capital inflow since late September and ending two consecutive weeks of continuous outflows. However, just one day later, the inflow plummeted dramatically to $23.16 million, a drop of 95.6%.
Breaking down the product data, the capital source is highly concentrated: BIT contributed most of the inflow, FBTC had a slight inflow, BITB experienced outflows, and other products showed almost no capital movement.
With some funds briefly entering, BTC price remains trapped in a range, oscillating between $80,000 and $84,000 over the past two weeks.
Institutions have set $82,500 as the short-term core support level, judging that the current narrow-range oscillation is unlikely to last long. To open up upside space, the price must hold above $87,000 to have a chance to challenge previous highs; if the $82,500 support fails, the downside target will directly look toward around $70,000.
The market generally views the October 28 FOMC meeting as a turning point for this oscillation.
The brief large capital inflow is insufficient to reverse the overall market, and the exhaustion of funds the next day also indicates that the bullish force is not solid. This small amount of capital has a negligible impact on the entire market. Going forward, the focus is on whether funds can continue to flow in and whether the heavy selling pressure above $83,000 can be effectively absorbed.
#BTC现货ETF连续流出 10000 challenge to recover 36000 on the fifth day
Current amount: 11400
$DOOD crashed sharply. My money came back and I even earned a few hundred more. My left-side trading, adding positions on floating losses, was all wrong. The only lifesaver was the initial 1x short position. This allowed me to still have 30% of the principal to turn things around in the end.
Still hard to believe the maximum value of dood was actually 0.0049, this number is unbelievable. I think many people naturally set their stop loss at a neat number like 0.005. Surprisingly, the market maker didn’t push it above 0.005 to squeeze shorts again.
The downtrend was confirmed at 0.0038. I saw smart traders alternately entering on the right side at this time, profiting from the range between 0.0038 and 0.0031.
I need to learn this pointCousin's Diary: October 22, 2026, 00:12
Mid-to-long term strategy based on this approach
The core of the Fed's rate cut logic is not simply to save itself, but to first use high oil prices + high interest rates to complete a "global stress screening," then achieve targeted harvesting through rate cuts, which is distinctly different from the traditional textbook rate cut logic.
1. The special "bear first, then explode" rate cut logic
Core argument:
1. First endure the dual pressure: The U.S. is currently bearing the triple burden of high oil prices, high interest rates, and high debt. Continuing to raise rates directly would have its policy effect offset by inflation driven up by high oil prices, which would instead drag itself down first. Therefore, it chooses "not to resolve Iran, allowing oil prices to remain high," using high oil prices to transmit inflation pressure outward.
2. Wait for external explosion first: Under the combination of high oil prices + high interest rates, global dollar demand is pushed up. Capital will continue to flow out from emerging markets and highly indebted economies lacking dollars. The asset and debt chains of some economies will break first. The U.S. completes the layout of "waiting for the target groups to be unable to endure first" during this process.
3. Finally cut rates to harvest: When external pressure reaches a critical point, the U.S. will launch large-scale rate cuts, release massive liquidity, and use low-cost dollars to bottom-fish global core assets that have already been hammered down.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC $SOL Netflix's Q3 profit exceeded expectations, but it fell 5.8% after hours.
Revenue was $12.874 billion, up 11.8%, with earnings per share of $0.87, while the market had only expected $0.82, and an operating margin of 34.6%.
The reason for the drop is not this quarter, but the next. The Q4 guidance of $13.4 billion is below expectations, with growth slowing to 11.5% for the fourth consecutive quarter, and the full-year ad revenue forecast was also lowered from $3 billion to $2.7 billion. Coupled with layoffs and a change in the head of content, the market fears the growth story may not continue.
Profit is the past, guidance is the future, and the market always prices the future first. $NFLX🚨is Are Rising Together — So Why Am I Still Hesitant to Turn Bullish? 👀
BTC at $81,991, $ETH at $2,410, and SOL at $105.18. All three are flashing green, but the bigger picture tells a different story.😀
Last week, $BTC and ETH spot ETFs recorded combined net outflows of approximately $549 million, while $SOL ETFs also saw outflows. That’s why I’m treating this move as emotional recovery rather than a confirmed trend reversal.#DailyOrbit Bitcoin spot ETF has continuous net inflows but fails to drive market sentiment. This divergence between macro funds and the crypto market is transmitting through liquidity tightening to small-cap stocks like $SKHYNIX. I judge the current rebound to be more of a correction rather than a reversal. The four-hour chart remains in a downtrend channel, down about 30% from the high, but the one-hour chart is turning upward. The price at 965 has an 8-point floating profit from the intraday low of 927.3, showing a clear short-term long and long-term short pattern. The order book's top ten bid-ask ratio is only 0.22, with overwhelming selling pressure. Negative funding rates indicate crowded shorts, and the 75,000 contracts open interest hides a risk of a short squeeze. A light short position can be tried at a rebound to 981.5, with a stop loss set above 1004.5 and a target at 938.7; if it pulls back to 929.4 and stabilizes, reverse to a short-term long with a stop loss at 916.8 and a target of 958.3. Single position size should not exceed 3% of total capital, and overnight positions should be halved in a negative funding rate environment.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading. —
$SKHYNIX#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限
$SKHYNIX It's almost midnight, brothers. Habitually checking the market before sleep. Tonight's sudden surge probably wiped out many shorts directly. BTC is soaring all the way close to 85,000. Those who missed out can only slap their thighs, but don't rush to open positions late at night. Let's take a look at the backend data.
$BTC current price around 84,500, up over 1.8%. The 4-hour long-short ratio dropped to 1.37 despite the big rise. Normally, a big rally should see more longs, so why did it drop? This indicates that during the rally, a large number of shorts were liquidated, and profitable longs were also closing positions. Open interest is still surging, meaning new big money is entering to take over. The market shows healthy turnover.
Looking at $ETH now at 2,507, finally above 2,500. The 4-hour long-short ratio also dropped to 1.43. Many crowded retail traders were shaken out by this sharp rally, but historically, there's heavy selling pressure above 2,500. Don't blindly chase highs late at night.
Finally, $SOL at 108.4, pushing hard. The 4-hour long-short ratio remains high at 2.38. This position is still too heavy, with retail all long. If BTC pulls back slightly late at night, it could trigger a long squeeze.
Summary: BTC and ETH have cleaned out leverage well, structure is stable, but SOL's risk remains. No need to gamble on the market late at night. Control your hands, stay flat, get a good sleep, and check again tomorrow.
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？
#Strive大额增持，Strategy回购规模超买币 After the US stock market opened, BTC rose
This BTC upward movement is driven by multiple factors resonating together, not by a single news stimulus. It can be divided into four core layers:
1. Macro sentiment layer: Market risk appetite is warming up, US Treasury yields and rate cut expectations have marginally improved, reducing the holding cost of high-risk assets, and funds are willing to flow back into risk assets.
2. Capital structure layer: Spot ETFs continuously provide institutional buying support, long-term chips have a high degree of lock-up, and the market's spot basic demand is solid, providing a foundational support for the rebound.
3. Short-term derivatives boost: After the price breaks upward out of the range, existing short positions in the market trigger stop-loss liquidations, forming short covering, further pushing up the price, amplifying short-term gains, and driving the market strength.
4. Sector driving effect: After the cryptocurrency market strengthens, liquidity spills over outward, driving rotation in sectors such as privacy coins and public chains. ZEC's recent rise is a typical example of sector funds following the overall market sentiment. The shovel sellers will also have to submit their answers tonight
After the US Eastern market closes tonight, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) will report earnings for Q1 of fiscal year 2027.
Consensus expectations: EPS $2.18 (+72%), revenue $8.12 billion (+52.4%).
But the stock price doesn't believe it at all: from the high of $347.49 on October 2 to $263.94 on October 16, a 24% drop in two weeks.
Last week, 20 AI and semiconductor giants lost over $1 trillion in market value in one week, with panic saying "AI is all about burning money with borrowed funds, equipment orders will eventually dry up."
However, Deutsche Bank raised its target price against the trend from $320 to $375, optimistic about new DRAM factories driving equipment demand in 2027.
Lam Research has beaten EPS expectations for 8 consecutive quarters; equipment orders are the most solid leading indicator to test the "truth of AI demand."
I think tonight Lam Research is the touchstone for the panic narrative: memory equipment revenue share jumping from 34% to an expected 45.7%, guidance not being lowered, shovels still selling, the crash is about sentiment; otherwise, if orders dry up, that's real, so keep watching and don't chase. Invalidation point: EPS or revenue below expectations, or memory order outlook downgraded, judgment void, market will look directly below $260.
Are you betting on Lam Research beating expectations tonight, or continuing to be hammered? A beats expectations B gets hammered
$LRCX $MU $ASML
#AI #semiconductorETF funds "flash in and out," BTC rebound lacks strength
BTC spot ETF recently experienced a rollercoaster of funds: from October 12 to 16, a net outflow of $228 million, but on the 19th, a sudden net inflow of $527 million, hitting a monthly high, with BlackRock making a significant contribution; however, on the 20th, net inflow quickly shrank to $23.16 million. The surge lasted only one day before fading, indicating institutional buying lacks continuity and the willingness to keep going long is weak.
Price reaction is even more straightforward. On the 19th, ETF inflows exceeded $500 million, yet BTC only oscillated around $82,000 without forming an effective breakout. This shows heavy selling pressure above, with incremental funds absorbed by sell orders. The current rebound mainly comes from passive buying after short liquidations, rather than sustained real-money ETF accumulation, making the rally somewhat hollow.
Currently, with tech giants' earnings season and the Federal Reserve's quiet period coinciding, large funds tend to avoid risk, and no one is willing to push prices up rashly in the short term. In terms of strategy, longs can reduce positions and lock in profits during the rebound without greed for the last bit; those out of the market should hold back, as volume-less rebounds are the easiest traps for bulls.
#BTC现货ETF连续净流入，市场反应有限
$BTC $ETH $KORU $KORU might rise tonight, a little less before the market opens, more during the session, hey
$SKHY Pretending to let you endure some hardship, not really tiring you out, you’re still in the trillion club.
Q2 2026 revenue 79.3 trillion KRW, up 257% year-on-year, operating profit 60.5 trillion KRW, up 557% year-on-year, first half revenue exceeded 100 trillion KRW.
Operating margin 76%, gross margin 83%.
Note, the net profit of 93.9 trillion was significantly boosted by a one-time gain from the sale of Kioxia shares, which should not be considered operating profit.
However, performance was below market expectations (operating profit estimated around 64.2 trillion), ADR fell nearly 6% after hours. "Best ever but below expectations" indicates the market’s expectations were already very high. #"The Democratic Party will not sweep both houses" ≈ The blue wave will at most advance into the House of Representatives, the Senate may not turn blue, don't take 'one party taking all' as the default outcome.#特斯拉交付超预期后盈利修复成焦点 Conclusion first: I lean bearish, choose No (stock fell on the first trading day after the earnings report)
Reasons
1. The market expectations are currently too high; Yes has already reached 80¢, meaning most people assume the earnings report will be very good. The biggest risk in this situation is "fully priced expectations" — even if the data just meets expectations without exceeding them, investors will feel "the good news has already been priced in," and will cash out and run, which is the common phenomenon of "good news fully reflected."
Although deliveries exceeded estimates, they still fell 2.1% year-over-year, achieved by price cuts to boost delivery volume, which will suppress gross margins. The market's core focus now is profit recovery; as long as gross margins fall short of expectations, the stock is prone to crash.
2. Industry pressure remains; the global electric vehicle price war continues, Tesla needs to keep cutting prices to maintain sales volume, which will continuously erode profits. Autonomous driving FSD is a long-term story; short-term earnings reports are unlikely to directly reflect large gains, making it difficult to support further stock price rallies.
$BTC Big Brother Maji's hedging portfolio is now caught in a tug-of-war between profit and loss. The BTC short position is steadily gaining unrealized profit, but the HYPE short position's losses continue to widen, with unrealized losses nearing 3.88 million U.
His strategy is BTC short + ETH long + HYPE short, holding three positions simultaneously to withstand market movements, with profits and losses switching back and forth with the market. The BTC short is currently profitable, the ETH long is slightly underwater, and the biggest drag on the account is the HYPE short. Fortunately, this position only uses 5x leverage, which is somewhat less risky compared to the other two.
Many mistakenly believe that hedging strategies guarantee profits, but hedging only mitigates the impact of sharp one-sided price surges or drops; it is not a foolproof way to preserve capital. HYPE itself is highly volatile, and if the price continues to rise, the losses from this short position could quickly wipe out all the profits earned from the BTC short.
Adding to that, with ETH at 25x leverage and BTC at 40x leverage on full positions, if the market moves in an extreme opposite direction, the risk of forced liquidation can come at any time.
Even large holders with substantial capital cannot withstand severe market volatility. In the futures market, there is no such thing as a permanently safe trading strategy.
#BTC成交萎缩，ETF买盘能否回暖 #SpaceXQ3 revenue surged 161%, AI business becomes the main growth driver SpaceX delivered an earnings report that exceeded expectations: revenue of $14.58 billion, a year-on-year increase of 161%; net profit of $4.4 billion, successfully turning a profit. The core highlight is the AI business explosion, with Super Intelligence (SI) revenue reaching $7.6 billion, surpassing the Starlink connectivity business's $5.2 billion; the latter remains an important profit pillar.
My view: SpaceX is transforming from a commercial aerospace company into a comprehensive platform of "Starlink cash flow + AI computing power + rocket technology," with significant growth potential. However, one should not only look at profit growth: AI capital expenditure is huge, and net profit is also affected by non-operating income. Future focus should be on the sustainability of AI revenue, capital return rate, and Starship reuse progress. The fundamentals are strong, but whether the valuation is reasonable still requires separate judgment.The roles of long and short liquidations have just switched. In the past 24 hours, the total long liquidations across the network reached $355 million, surpassing short liquidations at $298 million; and in the recent 4 hours, out of $119 million liquidated, longs accounted directly for $75.94 million.
What changed? A couple of days ago, shorts were being chased down, now the long positions chasing the market are taking over the liquidations. The largest single liquidation was $14.45 million, occurring on Hyperliquid's BTC contract.
Why is this worth noting? After the fuel for short stop-losses burned out, the longs chasing at high levels have become the new source of liquidations. Long liquidations surpassing shorts indicate that the leveraged long positions' defense line is being tested, not protected.
Which observation is more supported? It supports the "liquidation structure switch" rather than a continuation of one-sided squeezes. The dividend from short clearing is receding, and long crowding is beginning to be exposed.
Next, focus on one thing: will the proportion of long liquidations in the 4-hour window continue to expand? If longs keep dominating liquidations, the driving logic of this market cycle will have completely changed protagonists.
Shorts just laid down, and longs are already lining up? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC $ETH Contract long positions exploded by nearly $2.81 million within an hour, the market indeed looks bleak. Simply put, big players are using the rebound to sell off, profit-taking is concentrated, triggering panic selling, which has little to do with the fundamentals in the short term. $SNDK $BTC $ETH The underlying logic hasn't really changed. SanDisk has to bear the pressure of NAND prices and competition, Micron needs to prove that the high profits of DRAM and HBM can be sustained, and Hynix faces intensified HBM competition and the test of AI capital expenditure returns. This round of market dumping doesn't mean the AI story is over, but that funds are starting to recalculate how much premium high growth can still justify. There is no effective stabilization signal at the current position yet, so those wanting to bottom-fish should not rush and wait until the market truly stabilizes. #BTC spot ETF continuous net inflows, limited market reaction #SpaceX Q3 revenue surged 161%, AI business becomes the main growth driver #Netflix Q3 profits exceeded expectations, advertising business growth slowed In the past 24 hours, BTC short liquidations reached $70.47 million, accounting for 85.7% of BTC's total liquidations, while long liquidations only amounted to $9.06 million. The largest single liquidation came from Binance BTC/USDT, where a $11.96 million short position was directly wiped out.
What changed? The price pushed above 84,000, liquidating shorts. BTC short liquidations accounted for over 80%, and ETH was even more extreme, with short liquidations making up nearly 94%.
Why is this noteworthy? This is not a bullish attack but rather shorts being too crowded and stop-losses being triggered one by one. Liquidations were concentrated in the last 12 hours, making up 80% of the day's total, indicating the squeeze was impulsive rather than driven by sustained buying.
Which observation is more supported? It supports "short positions being passively cleared" rather than trend confirmation. After shorts are eliminated, if spot and ETFs don't take over, the price is likely to lose direction once the squeeze ends.
Next thing to watch: In the next round of liquidation data, will the proportion of longs start to rise? If long liquidations expand again, it means those chasing longs are becoming the new fuel.
Shorts are cleared, who will be next? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC BTC once touched 84,888, with $327 million liquidated across the network in 24 hours, shorts accounting for $250 million — but spot ETF inflows plummeted from $526 million to $23.16 million, shrinking by 95%.
What changed? The price was pulled from 83,233 to 84,888, fueled by short stop-losses, not spot buying. The funding rate was only +0.0052%, and leveraged longs did not chase the rally.
Why is this worth noting? Mid-sized whales' holdings hit a six-month high, but super whales are still net reducing — accumulation hasn't spread to the top tier. The short liquidation intensity above 86,990 is $1.425 billion, while the long liquidation intensity below 79,160 is even higher at $1.947 billion, making longs more crowded.
Which observation is more supported? It favors "high-level turnover after a short squeeze" rather than an incremental trend. Selling pressure remains above 84,800, and the price has yet to break out of the October range.
Next thing to watch: whether ETF inflows can hold steady for a third consecutive day. If they continue to shrink to the tens of millions level, the sustainability of this rally is questionable.
Shorts have been cleared, but spot hasn't taken over. Is 84,800 the end or just a pause? Let's discuss in the comments. $BTC $NFLX dropped 4.5% intraday on the first day after the earnings report, about 1.6 times the ATR, while the sector average was only -0.1%, indicating a stock-specific movement.
Q3 earnings per share were $0.87, better than the expected $0.82; but Q4 revenue guidance was $13.4 billion, below the market estimate of $13.54 billion.
Analysis: A typical "good earnings, weak guidance" scenario, with a high probability of closing down on the first day.如果把这周ETF数据当成一张情绪温度计，那么BTC和ETH正在量出两种体温。 同样是净流出，为什么市场只对ETH皱眉？ 昨天BTC现货ETF单日净流出约403枚BTC（约3388万美元），但拉长到7天仍是净流入2528枚（约2.12亿美元）；ETH那边单日流出12688枚（约3142万美元），7天累计流出15.5万枚（约3.84亿美元）。数字摆在一起，反差挺刺眼的🍓 我盯着这两组流向看了好一会儿，感觉市场不是在交易"有没有资金"，而是在交易"谁更值得被留下"。 偏多的解读是：BTC的短期赎回更像获利了结和仓位再平衡，7天口径没坏，说明配置盘还在；一旦价格横住，边际买盘回来会很快。偏空的风险则藏在ETH那头，连续失血会削弱反弹时的追价意愿，ETH/BTC走弱又容易把山寨的情绪压回去，形成一种"BTC稳住、其他资产却提不起劲"的钝感。这种钝感比急跌更磨人，因为它让风险偏好慢慢变凉，而不是一次性释放。 我更在意的是节奏：当主流资产里出现明显强弱差，交易者会本能地缩窄战场，先抱紧确定性，再谈弹性。所以短期看，BTC更像情绪锚，ETH更像情绪试纸；前者稳住能托住大盘下限，后者不修复就很难打开向ETH surged to 2515, surpassing 2500 for the first time in a week. In the past 24 hours, $186.8 million worth of short positions across the network were liquidated, accounting for nearly 70% of total liquidations. However, at the same time, ETH spot ETFs have seen net outflows for 5 consecutive days, with a total withdrawal of $1.08 billion in October.
What has changed? The price is rising, shorts are being liquidated, but ETF funds are flowing out. The fuel for the rally is short stop-losses, not spot buying.
Why is this worth noting? Long positions account for 68% of accounts, but active trading is skewed towards shorts, indicating a lack of strong willingness to chase longs. The short liquidation zone above $2572 is only $553 million, while the long liquidation zone below $2333 is as high as $1.023 billion — the short stop-loss line is closer, but longs are more crowded.
Which observation is more supported? It favors a "structural repair after short squeeze" rather than an incremental-driven trend. Large whales are rotating from BTC to ETH, while ancient whales are using this liquidity wave to clear nine-year positions. Chips are changing hands, not accumulating.
From now on, focus on one thing: will ETF outflows stop above 2515? If ETFs continue to withdraw while shorts have already capitulated, the sustainability of this rally is questionable.
Shorts have been cleared, spot ETFs are still selling, so who is lying? Let's discuss in the comments. $ETH