Orbit Post Sitemap
[French National Assembly Finance Committee Rejects Budget Bill, Crypto Tax Amendments Invalidated]
The French National Assembly Finance Committee rejected the revenue section of the 2027 budget bill by 31 votes to 3, causing amendments related to crypto asset exit tax and stablecoin exchange taxation to become invalid. The related proposals need to be resubmitted. The National Assembly will re-vote on the budget revenue section on October 20 and vote on the entire bill on November 17. Previously passed amendments included incorporating crypto asset exchanges to stablecoins into the taxable scope, expanding the applicability of the exit tax, and requiring the declaration of self-custody wallets with year-end values exceeding €100,000, with undeclared wallets facing fines up to €10,000.$STRK 这单，50倍空单目前浮盈500%+，开仓在0.10341，现在标价0.0928附近。这波吃的不是单纯的技术回调，而是高位资金分歧后的情绪退潮。
说实话，0.1268那根针打出来之后，盘面的味道就变了。连续冲高不破，上方获利盘太重，尤其是这种Layer1&2赛道的热门币，前面7天涨了70%多，30天翻倍，市场给足了估值，但到了高位，接力资金一旦跟不上，就是踩踏。
我选择在0.103附近开空，逻辑很直接：4小时级别看，价格跌破短期均线后，反弹无力，均线开始拐头向下。0.10这个整数关口失守，意味着多头最后的防线被撕开。后面那几根大阴线下来，量能是放大的，说明不是自然回落，是主动兑现。
跌到0.09附近我本来想过减仓，但看承接并不强，反弹都是缩量的，说明抄底资金还在观望。这种走势，空头趋势没走完，就让它继续飘着。50倍杠杆确实激进，但位置对了，拿住就是时间换空间。$SOL 永续100x空单，110.05开，标记价108.87，浮盈+106.31%。
4小时级别在110上方构筑双顶压制，反弹高点逐次降低。MACD动能柱翻绿且死叉确认，价格正式跌破短周期均线簇。多头反扑无力，顺势跟空。100x杠杆，止损设109.50防守。
【消息面】SOL现货ETF预期降温，资金从生态代币中撤离。同时Meme板块整体回调，抽干了SOL链的活跃度与手续费燃烧预期。
操作上，移动止损推至109.20锁利。若放量跌破108.00支撑，持有看向105.00；若在109.00附近缩量企稳，直接全平落袋$BTC $ETH #台积电Q3营收创新高，10月15日财报还有哪些看点？ $ARB 永续50倍空单，0.1971开，现0.18878，浮盈+211.06%。
没想太多：前期盘整够久，0.1971 平台反复确认有效，顶部特征很清楚。放量阴线一出就进，跟趋势不跟情绪。50倍，止损 0.205。砸得又快又稳，完全不给二次进场机会，大肉单到手。
0.192 先锁一层安全垫。我个人判断 0.18 附近会有支撑，到时候看量能决定是走还是留，不提前猜底。$BTC $ETH #俄乌或达成“能源停火”协议，进展待确认 $FIL led the market rally today. Among 72 mainstream coins, FIL had the highest increase.
On October 15, the six-year genesis token vesting plan ended. The 3 million + 1 million FIL issued back then were released as scheduled. The conclusion after six years is that the annual new supply dropped from 89 million to 21 million, a direct cut of 76%, marking the largest supply contraction in the project's six years. The market anticipated this event, and over the past week, FIL rose from $1.08 to $1.24, steadily climbing day by day.
There is also another event: the Solstice network upgrade on October 19, which mandates all nodes and storage providers to upgrade, interpreted by the market as a technical milestone. Over the past two years, Filecoin has been promoting "Filecoin Onchain Cloud," selling decentralized storage to AI and RWA project parties, with paid storage demand increasing.
A once-in-six-years halving event—those who bet right are reaping the rewards. Stop-loss is painful. When my mind was overwhelmed, I had already fully added to my position. Watching the rapidly falling candlesticks, my eyes were filled with confusion, as if my body no longer belonged to me. I could only watch bit by bit. By the time I reacted, the loss had grown from 50u to 180u. I had opened the position four days ago and repeatedly advised myself not to add positions recklessly, not to rush, and not to be swayed by emotions. I thought I would stop loss at a 20u loss, but I couldn't wait and added positions early, moving the stop-loss line down little by little until I finally canceled it altogether. My mind kept fantasizing that a reversal was about to happen, until a heavy candlestick slammed down. When I finally realized it, my mind started to struggle: it had fallen so much, it should go up now, right? If I cut losses now, would I be selling at the bottom? In the end, reason won over emotion, but the loss was still severe.BTC and ETH Quarterly Review: Clear Rebound in Q3, Avoid Blindly Bullish in Q4
Reviewing data from 2023 to 2026, the quarterly trends of BTC and ETH show clear divergence:
- **Q3 generally strong**: In four years, three years ended with gains, especially Q3 2026, driven by ETF capital inflows and improved macro liquidity, BTC rose 42.71%, ETH surged 70.8%, marking a typical recovery window.
- **Q4 is unstable**: Q4 is not automatically bullish; in four years, three years ended with losses (e.g., BTC down 23% and ETH down 28% in 2025). Year-end markets often face rebalancing and profit-taking pressure, not a one-sided bull run.
- **Q1/Q2 volatile**: Early year fluctuations are intense, with ETH as a high Beta asset showing price swings far exceeding BTC.
**Trading Insights**
After a big Q3 rally, Q4 should not be simply seen as a continuation of the bull trend. Instead of betting by calendar, closely monitor ETF capital flows, key resistance levels, and changes in open interest. If there is stagnation at high levels or overheated funding rates, be cautious of pullback risks; only a volume-backed break and hold above key levels provides momentum for further advances. Finally understand why I've been liquidating all the time!!!
This issue actually has a lot of academic research and regulatory data behind it, and the answer is harsh but very clear.
People who can make long-term profits in the futures market: about 1%–5%.*
Note, this is not a random "80/20 rule" guess, but a result repeatedly verified by multiple national regulatory agencies and academic studies:
| US CFTC (2024 report) | About **70%** of retail crypto derivatives traders lose money within any 12-month window |
| Europe ESMA (mandatory disclosure) | Crypto CFD retail accounts **74%–89%** lose money |
| Bank for International Settlements BIS (2023, 95 million user sample) | Median retail crypto investor is **losing money** |
| Taiwan intraday trader academic study (15 years data) | Intraday traders who can **consistently and predictably** profit after fees are **less than 1%** |
| Exchange data (Binance/Bybit/OKX etc.) | Over **80%** of retail traders lose money on futures; most beginners lose their principal in the first month |
Let's break it down so you can see where you fit:
- **Short-term occasional winners: 10%–40%.** Many people make money some months—you have too, you've said yourself "the trade was clearly profitable." But **short-term profits and sustained profits are different things**; stretch the time to a year, and most people give back their profits.
- **Net profit over 12 months: 5%–9%.**
- **Stable profits over multiple years: less than 1%.** This is the real proportion of the "1000 turning into 100,000" small group you see in videos—and many of them eventually give it back too.
- **High leverage is a death accelerator:** Accounts with over 50x leverage mostly don't survive 24 hours. There's a saying in the industry: "90-90-90"—90% of people lose 90% of their principal within 90 days.
## Why is the probability so low? Three structural reasons
1. **Futures are a negative-sum game.** In spot markets, you profit from asset appreciation (which can be positive-sum), but in futures, every penny you earn is someone else's loss, and after fees and funding rates, the whole pool leaks—on average, everyone loses.
2. **Your opponent is not another retail trader.** It's market makers, quant funds, institutions—they have faster speeds, lower fees, better data. Retail traders are the weakest players at this table.
3. **Leverage amplifies emotional flaws.** No take-profit, adding to losing positions, revenge trading after liquidation—you have all these. It's not just your personal problem, it's human nature, and high leverage turns these weaknesses into fatal flaws.
## Interesting comparison group
With the same market money: **People holding Bitcoin spot for over 1 year have a historical profit probability of about 67%; over 3 years, nearly 99%** (historical data, not predictive). Futures traders have a 12-month profit probability of 5%–9%.
**In the same market, people who do nothing have a 67% win rate, while those who watch the market daily and trade have a 5% win rate.** It's not because traders are dumb, but because the game is designed this way: exchanges earn fees, market makers earn spreads, they don't need to bet on direction, they win regardless—**the only guaranteed winners in this ecosystem are the casino operators and the house.**
## What this means for you
That 1%–5% who survive have a surprisingly consistent profile: 2–5x leverage, single trade risk 1%–2%, stop-loss and take-profit set before entry, review every trade, and exit after losses. Simply put, **their winning method is exactly the "slow" way you currently dislike**—using discipline to improve odds, not leverage to speed up.
You've already paid two years of tuition; the data has told you which group you're in. The good news is you can switch groups—move your main capital to dollar-cost averaging and spot (the 67% win group), keep a small futures account to practice the 1% method. If you want, I can organize the "complete rule list for the 1% players" into a card file for you to review before opening a position.$ETH 永续100x多单，2495.33开，标记价2530.49，浮盈+141.06%。
1小时级别走出了漂亮的V型反转，价格强势站上所有短周期EMA均线。虽然RSI快接近超买区，但动能还没熄，多头沿着趋势线稳步推高。100x杠杆，止损设2510防守。
【消息面】ETH现货ETF连续净流出后终于迎来单日微幅流入，市场情绪从极度悲观中修复。同时Layer2生态代币集体异动，资金开始回流以太坊主网相关叙事。
操作上，移动止损推至2520锁利。若放量突破2550前高，持有看2600；若在2530附近缩量横盘，直接全平落袋。$ZEC $BTC #台积电Q3营收创新高，10月15日财报还有哪些看点？ Order Book Strength Ranking
5-minute median slippage, estimated by order book
$BOME large buy/sell costs rise simultaneously, small buy costs remain almost unchanged. Simulated slippage for 100,000 scale buy/sell increased from 0.63%/0.72% to 0.78%/0.83%. 10,000 buy remains about 0.10%.
$RSR large buy cost rises, small buy cost remains almost unchanged. Simulated slippage for 100,000 scale buy increased from 0.49% to 0.54%. 10,000 buy remains about 0.12%.
$W after order size amplification, slippage on both buy and sell sides increased significantly. Simulated slippage for 10,000 scale buy/sell is 0.10%/0.08%, for 100,000 it is 0.47%/0.36%.One green day can change the mood.
It cannot, by itself, establish a trend.
The same applies to ETF flows, price breakouts and sudden altcoin rallies.
I want to see follow-through: another session, stronger participation or evidence that demand is spreading.
In crypto, the first move gets attention.
What happens next often tells the more useful story.DropsTab: The TRUMP team unlocks about 909 thousand tokens daily - that's $1.74 million at the current price. The unloading to the crowd is going successfully 🤌️️️️️️ According to #DropsTab, the linear unlocking is distributed between the Creators & CIC Digital structures. Every day, another 909,465 TRUMP become available, or 0.09% of the total supply and approximately 0.32% of the current market capitalization. If the price remains around $1.91, about 27.3 million TRUMP worth around $52 million will be unlocked in a month. This is comparable to almost Staying up late at night watching the market, I came across some news: HK is launching the second spot SOL ETF tomorrow, from Pando, and the ticker is already set.
Veteran traders' first reaction to this kind of news is disbelief. ETFs are stories before launch, liquidity after launch, and the period in between is the easiest time for dumping. Earlier this year, when the US spot ETF wave hit, I reduced my position too early and missed out on some gains, which I still remember; later, chasing the news and adding back, I got hit again. Anyway, I've learned my lesson—betting on data never ends well, better to wait until it really takes off.
SOL has dropped from its highs these past two days, currently around $108, down nearly 10% over the week, which looks scary. But this HK ETF is a real listing, not just a PPT. If mid-term funds come in through compliant channels, it will be a slow grind, not a sudden spike. $SOL A new week begins with three key triggers on the table.
The first is Wednesday night’s CPI. The minutes leaned hawkish, but the nonfarm payrolls were weak, leaving inflation as the sole judge in the market. If the numbers are soft, the rate hike story fades; if the numbers are strong, the recently calmed liquidations might flare up again.
The second trigger is the Middle East. Four bombings over two days at Riyadh airport caused over 320 casualties, including one American citizen killed; Trump is considering direct military action. Iran hinted that the US accepted some conditions, making a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz possible. With escalation and negotiations happening simultaneously, oil prices can only jump up and down.
The third, least conspicuous trigger: the midterm elections. Goldman Sachs says oil prices rising from $3 to $5 increase the Democrats’ chances by 4 points, with a 65% probability of sweeping both chambers; Bank of America warns that if they do sweep, the stock market could drop 10%. Gasoline prices are no longer just about consumer prices—they have become votes and positions.
Market snapshot: Bitcoin at 83,641, Ethereum at 2,538, ZEC at 1,267. Funding rates have just been reset; don’t rush to prove your quick hands. My plan: no moves before Wednesday, wait for all triggers to play out before accounting. Last week’s impatience hurt and is still fresh.
Which trigger worries you most this week? CPI, the Middle East, or the elections?
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#CPI and PPI announcements imminent, rate hike expectations face a test
#Russia-Ukraine may reach an "energy ceasefire" agreement, progress pending confirmation
#TradingVoice: Your experience deserves to be heard I'm betting on a rebound around midnight tonight, dare to follow?😮💨
The recent market trend has been quite predictable: it drops in the afternoon, starts to rally around 2 AM, then oscillates and falls back around 7 or 8 in the morning. This has happened several times—looks like it's going to crash during the day, but then it secretly rebounds at night, only to be pushed back down in the morning. The rhythm is completely off.
Why does it tend to rally at midnight? Simply put, the early morning hours are the window when Asia-Pacific and Europe-America liquidity overlap. With the US market closing and the Asian market opening, funds tend to make moves at this point. Plus, liquidity is thin at night, so a small amount of capital can push prices up.
$BTC is hovering around $83,000, fluctuating between $82,500 and $84,300 during the day, with support near $82,200 below.
$ETH is around $2,530, with a weak rebound, and support near $2,490 below.
$ZEC is around $1,266, with greater volatility, and support near $1,220 below.
If there’s a spike down to around $80,800 at midnight, you can try placing a light position to see if you can catch it; for Ethereum, try around $2,400. If you catch it, hold on; if not, don’t chase the rally.
This rebound looks more like a corrective oscillation after a drop, not a true reversal. If you can catch the support level during the midnight spike, the risk-reward ratio is acceptable; if not, don’t force it. Wait for tomorrow’s CPI data to see the direction.
⚠️ This is a personal market review and does not constitute investment advice $ETH 永续合约 100倍多单，2508.19开，现2532.11，浮盈+95.36%。
逻辑很简单：大批ETH现货ETF挂钩期权临近到期日，行权价集中在2500上方。机构做市商为对冲风险被迫在现货市场持续买入ETH推高价格，形成典型的伽马挤压（Gamma Squeeze）。衍生品驱动现货单边急涨。100倍杠杆，止损2515。
基本面支撑：隐含波动率飙升，看涨期权成交量远超看跌。
移动止盈推至成本价上方锁利。警惕期权到期后买盘力量瞬间枯竭。$BTC $ZEC #俄乌或达成“能源停火”协议，进展待确认 $ENA has entered the oversold zone; a rebound and a bottom are two different things.
$ENA is down 5.58% in 24 hours, currently priced at 0.2232. The 1-hour and 4-hour RSI are 25 and 51 respectively. Oversold conditions can trigger rebound demand, but a rebound only indicates a sharp drop; a bottom requires the price to stop breaking the structure.
Volume does not support the price movement: the current 1-hour trading volume is only 0.28 times the average volume of the previous 20 bars. Low volume can also move prices quickly, but sustainability must be proven by the next market phase. A single touch or one long candlestick is not enough to draw conclusions.
Looking back at the 24-hour range: the low is 0.2211, the high is 0.2474. The current price of 0.2232’s position within this range directly affects the meaning of the same signal. When near the high, strength needs to prove it’s not a pump and dump; when near the low, a rebound needs to prove it’s not a downtrend continuation. The range is not a forecast target, but a tool to check whether the current narrative is hiding risks.$SAND 永续50倍空单，0.06505开，现0.06189，浮盈+242.89%。
没想太多：前期盘整够久，0.06505 平台反复确认有效，顶部特征很清楚。放量阴线一出就进，跟趋势不跟情绪。50倍，止损 0.068。砸得又快又稳，完全不给二次进场机会，大肉单到手。
0.063 先锁一层安全垫。我个人判断 0.058 附近会有支撑，到时候看量能决定是走还是留，不提前猜底。$BTC $ETH #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 I no longer fantasize about doubling my money
My goal is to improve the profit-loss ratio
But why do I always seem to be off track:
I open positions based on the breakout on the 6-hour K-line, so why do I close positions based on the reversal on the 4-hour K-line?"Bitcoin Super Week: Four Major Risks, Daily Breakdown"
This week is not an ordinary one; it's a "pressure cooker" with macro data, the Federal Reserve Chair, tech earnings, and options expiration all converging. Bitcoin won't stay calm; it will only get more volatile.
Tuesday: OPEC monthly report probes Middle East supply gaps; U.S. September existing home sales get a follow-up check to see if high interest rates are exposing weaknesses in real estate.
Wednesday: September CPI is the main event: year-over-year expected at 3.6%, month-over-month 0.6%, core month-over-month 0.3%. It will determine whether funds continue to bet on "no rate change in October" or turn back to betting on a rate hike. If hotter than expected, Bitcoin faces sudden pressure overhead, with 80,000 becoming a psychological barrier; if cooler, the negative factors are exhausted, and 83,000 could rebound to 84,500.
Thursday: PPI takes the stage, with Fed Chair Powell appearing. If PPI is hot and Powell turns hawkish, it's a double whammy; if PPI is cool and Powell plays it cautious, Bitcoin might catch a breather.
Friday: Monthly options expiration, with the biggest pain point around 84,000; market makers' hedging could amplify volatility further.
At the same time, major tech companies start releasing Q3 earnings. If the AI narrative stabilizes the tech sector's risk appetite, Bitcoin could benefit; if earnings trigger sell-offs, Bitcoin will struggle to stay unaffected.
Key takeaway this week: Don't expect calm; prepare for amplification. #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 #俄乌或达成“能源停火”协议，进展待确认 $BTC price slid down from around 84,000 last night. The one-hour candlestick showed a huge trading volume, which startled me. But as it dropped to the recent level, the trading volume on the market shrank significantly.
After the large-volume bearish candle on the one-hour chart, the following candlesticks saw their trading volume cut by more than half. The last few 15-minute candlesticks had trading volumes at only about 40% of the usual average. The price continued to slide down, but volume steadily declined. After the bearish selling pressure was released, there were no follow-up sell orders below.
The RSI indicator on the 15-minute chart also showed a bullish divergence. The recent candlestick dipped to a lower position, but the RSI value actually rose. The momentum of the bearish sell-off is weakening, and the downward move has paused here.
Looking at the daily chart, the current price is holding at 82,800. The daily moving averages still maintain a bullish alignment. At the daily level, the volume contraction during the pullback suggests that buying support is present below. I am bullish and expect the market to likely stabilize here first and then rebound.
$ETH $SOL #CPI and PPI announcements are imminent, testing rate hike expectations #Russia-Ukraine may reach an "energy ceasefire" agreement, progress pending confirmation #TSMC Q3 revenue hits a record high, what other highlights to watch in the October 15 earnings report? Before the knife even falls, the kitchen already smells something burning—the U.S. Treasury says it plans to seize about one billion USD in Iranian crypto assets. The lid hasn't been lifted, but the flames are already licking the eyebrows. Tether has also frozen a batch of stablecoins related to Iran, like the central kitchen suddenly shutting off the broth valve; whichever stove lacks broth, the pot instantly congeals.
At this investment table, I've said before: mainstream coins are the main dish, altcoins are the seasoning, and leveraged contracts are the extra spicy chili. Today's news isn't just sprinkling scallions; it's like throwing ice cubes into hot oil. The U.S. Senate's investigation into sanction controls is like a health inspector suddenly flipping through the kitchen's ledgers: where's the cold chain, who labeled what, and which secret channels brought in the seasonings. No new seizure details, nor confirmation if this stacks on the roughly one billion seized in May—it's like the menu says "secret recipe," but the formula isn't locked down, so diners can only smell and guess the doneness.
For $xMSTR, a U.S. stock proxy, the reaction is more like a co-branded ready meal: the news spices things up, emotions color first, and the plating flames crackle. But what truly determines the taste is the underlying liquidity broth. Iranian-related funds being targeted means some on-chain channels will be forced to change knives; stablecoin freezes cause some "seasonings" to lose liquidity, and altcoin markets will choke first. The leveraged spicy chili is the most dangerous—usually it adds aroma, but when the wind tightens, it burns through the gut, overpowering even the main dish.
I see this situation like a kitchen inspection: on one side is the U.S. Treasury's cold knife, on the other the Senate flipping through accounts; platforms are named, Tether draws broth, and Iranian-related plates are forced to switch stoves. One billion USD sounds like a whole Wagyu slab, but it might actually be a platter of scraps—some fatty, some sinewy, poorly cut leaving residue in the mouth. The market loves to hype sanction news as secret spicy sauce—smells strong, but the taste may lack layers. The main dish isn't cooked, seasonings fly first, and what finally lands on the table is just a burnt edge.
Regarding this one billion figure, the kitchen fears "close enough." The roughly one billion from May is still on the books, and now rumors suggest another seizure, like boiling two pots of broth from the same beef bone, just changing the label; the flavor may not double. If the market treats this as new spice to scramble for, positions can easily burn to the bottom. Tether freezing Iranian-related stablecoins is like locking part of the liquidity broth in the freezer; when on-chain turnover slows, altcoin stir-fries lose fire first. The Senate's sanction control inquiry is about checking if the kitchen has any leaks, not about how pretty your plating is today. Funds will pick cleaner stoves; risk appetite is like customers waiting for a table—smell burning, and they switch restaurants.
Remember my stove rule: when the fire is too strong, first check if there's water in the pot, then if there's oil on the ladle. The old Iranian stew stirred by the U.S. Treasury's ladle first brings up not meat, but oil and chili essence. #iranusd1bseizurerisk$PONS 永续20倍空单，0.3578开，现0.2909，浮盈+373.95%。
就是赌一个顶部反转：0.3578 三次测试不破，量能阶梯式递减，顶部特征很标准。等阴线砸下来那一刻进场，绝不提前猜顶。20倍，止损 0.38。这一波走得非常干净，几乎没有反抽，收益稳步攀升。
暂时不动，让子弹飞一会儿。0.31 作为防守线先挂着保住本金安全，等 0.27 那边给明确信号再说加不减的事，不着急。$BTC $ETH #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 $BTC BTC spike to 84,000 then dropped back, main force secretly accumulating, long leverage extremely crowded $BTC
BTC current price 82,898.9, 24-hour slight rise +0.20%. On the 15-minute chart, early session surged to 84,361.6 then faced selling pressure, quickly fell back and found support near 82,400, currently consolidating around 82,800.
Conclusion: Short-term surge followed by pullback, main funds secretly net inflow accumulating, but the market's long leverage is extremely crowded, beware of a downward shakeout by the main force.
Market situation
Price is currently above MA5 (82,777.3) and MA10 (82,778.8), but capped by MA20 (82,876.9). The upper shadow at 84,361.6 indicates clear short-term resistance. Performance is mixed: 7-day decline of -3.31%, but 90-day gain of +26.69%.
Capital flow shows: 5-minute net inflow of 5.81 BTC (inflow 9.1 vs outflow 3.28). Large orders inflow 6.49 BTC dominates, indicating main force decisively accumulating on short-term pullback.
Sentiment and leverage heavily favor longs: leverage long-short ratio as high as 16.36; among borrowed coins, long borrow volume (1,248.93 BTC) far exceeds short borrow volume (76.35 BTC). The market's long leverage is too crowded, motivating the main force to shake out downward.
Trading plan
Long: Avoid blindly chasing at highs. Wait for a pullback near 82,400 (24-hour low), observe volume contraction and stabilization or continued capital inflow before considering going long. Set stop loss below 82,400. Target partial profit-taking near 83,800.
Short: Aggressive traders can try light short positions in the 83,800-84,300 range (previous highs and moving average resistance) if signs of stagnation appear (e.g., long upper shadow, volume shrinkage). Stop loss above 84,400. Target 82,400, break below target 82,000.
Although main funds are buying, long leverage is too crowded, a downward shakeout could come anytime. 10x leverage is highly volatile, control your trades, enter and exit lightly and quickly.
⚠️ Cryptocurrency is highly volatile, the above is personal trading ideas only and does not constitute investment advice. $BTC
#CPI and PPI announcements approaching, interest rate hike expectations face test #TSMC Q3 revenue hits record high, what to watch in October 15 earnings? #Institutions keep positioning, why is BTC still under pressure? 🔍 $ETH WATCH: WHALE TRANSFERS ≠ SELLING!
Two wallets reportedly linked to the Ethereum Foundation transferred 4,393 ETH ($11.13M) to Kraken.
⚠️ An exchange transfer doesn’t confirm a sale.
📊 Watch ETH support near $2,500, trading volume, BTC direction, and follow-up on-chain activity before drawing conclusions.
👇 Do you trade whale transfers or wait for price confirmation?
$ETH The shadowless lamp above the operating table just went out. I took off my blood-stained latex gloves and habitually skimmed through a market news piece—twelve tokenized US stocks have just landed on Solana's blockchain: Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX. Each token is a one-to-one backed security interest, carrying dividends and voting rights, no longer just a shell of price. This was the second major operation I witnessed today: assets transplanted whole from the traditional thoracic cavity into a decentralized extracorporeal circulation channel.
But my professional instincts immediately started questioning the blood supply. In any transplant surgery, the deadliest complication is not rejection but interruption of blood flow. The pathway for on-chain tokenized stocks requires settlement via stablecoins and registered brokers acting as the pump heads of the extracorporeal circulation. Yet now, the two major vessels responsible for handling large blood flows—the digital securities exchanges and a leading derivatives platform—have not yet been opened or connected. This means these twelve tokens currently only have structural commitments, lacking real trading depth perfusion. Without depth, it’s a hotbed for myocardial ischemia: price discounts, thin trading volume, and at the first wave of redemptions, the hemodynamics collapse instantly.
I need to assess these three vital signs:
First, one-to-one equity backing. This is the sinus rhythm, the compliant pacemaker, allowing institutional funds to come in and monitor the ECG, rather than risking ventricular fibrillation like naked long positions. Dividends and voting rights mean this is not a pure arbitrage game but a real asset’s long-term perfusion.
Second, Solana’s on-chain efficiency. The surgical field is clear, suturing is fast, and fees are low—suitable for high-frequency blood flow bypass grafting. Settlement uses USDC, equivalent to replacing self-drawn blood with ready-made plasma, offering good compatibility but relying on the coagulation function of the stablecoin channel—once it de-pegs, it’s a fatal air embolism.
Third, the balance of liquidity and redemption. This is the biggest intraoperative risk. Subscription is easy, but redemption is the pressure test under aortic clamping. Without market makers establishing anastomoses on both sides, redemption requests will surge like a sudden increase in venous return, bursting the ventricle.
As for the token linked to the US stock underlying assets, its candlestick chart is not a market trend but an ECG—looking excited during tachycardia but actually a precursor to uncontrolled myocardial oxygen consumption. The real lesion lies in that the compliance framework for on-chain securities is already formed, but the perfusion system is still an extracorporeal temporary circulation, which may need a bailout or could stop at any time. Whoever can replace the aortic cross-clamp with an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator within thirty seconds as the lead surgeon will survive. #securitize12stocks【On-Chain Trading Activity｜xyz:GOOGL】
Monitored address 0xe310 opened a short position:
▪ Execution price: 354.02 USD
▪ Transaction amount this time: 512,790.22 USD
▪ Leverage: 20xBTC liquidity has recovered, but the buffer is not constant. In the CoinDesk study from October 10, the volume of orders within 1% of the BTC price on October 7 was about $11.7 million; by October 8, the depth had already decreased by approximately 12%. Depth refers to how many orders are available near the price. To analyze trade execution, check the current order book of your pair, the spread, and the order volume relative to the trade size. A snapshot across multiple exchanges does not describe your OKX order book.$BTC The most insidious move on the chessboard is never a direct queen sacrifice attack, but rather the pawn quietly advancing along the flank while you’re focused on the center squares. Ledger’s current situation is exactly like this: what’s exposed isn’t the king’s castle, but the passageway at the southeast corner—the CryptoBilis reseller channel. Confirmed theft cases are concentrated here, with few affected devices; one was found implanted with unauthorized components. The official claim is that their system and direct sales link have no vulnerabilities, but researchers estimate suspected losses exceeding $86 million, though the causal link to the implanted components has yet to be verified. European buyers have also reported suspicious components in a reseller device, which remains unresolved.
The issue isn’t the amount lost, but whether the risk is confined to a single line. Experienced players faced with this situation don’t first count pieces; they ask: is this passage an isolated weak square, or a forward post of a structural flaw in the entire board? If only one reseller is compromised, it’s a sacrifice that can be cut off, with clear cost and a still manageable endgame. But if the supply chain’s verification step itself is a vulnerability—factory firmware, logistics transit, repackaging—any link could have a hidden pawn inserted. Then you’re not facing a single weak point, but a chain threat along an entire diagonal.
The position I dread most when playing chess is when the opponent simultaneously makes seemingly unrelated small moves in three places. You think they’re just exchanging pieces, but actually they’re setting up a double strike three moves ahead. If the estimated $80 million loss truly isn’t related to a single implanted device, it means losses are more widespread and dispersed, and single-point defense strategies completely fail. Conversely, if it is the same method, it also proves this attack route is replicable and scalable, just not fully deployed yet.
A true grandmaster’s move in this situation isn’t to rush exchanges to calm the board, but to first calculate the king’s safe squares—you must assume this channel is already breached, then deduce whether other routes share the same weakness. The initiative to verify truth or falsehood cannot be handed to the opponent; that’s waiting to be checkmated.
The outcome of the midgame is often decided before the endgame. When a pawn on the flank advances to your second rank, the real danger is never that pawn itself, but the open diagonal behind it. #ledgerresellersecurityWho's dumping? It's not a single whale
The ETF's three-week bullish streak just broke, $BTC surged to 84,000 but was pushed back to 82,900 during the US stock market session. It's not that ETFs aren't buying, but marginal buying pressure can't withstand the macro sell-off. The September FOMC minutes were hawkish, with possible rate hikes later this year. As interest rate expectations rise, risk assets get their valuations suppressed first. BTC is the most sensitive; after dropping from 87,000 to 80,500, its rebound has never surpassed 84,000. Overhead resistance and short-term leverage are both being liquidated.
$ETH is even more awkward: it fell from 2,700 to 2,420, and its rebound to 2,540 stalled. It can't keep up with BTC on the upside and amplifies volatility on the downside. ETH/BTC is stuck at 0.030, with funds clearly clustering around BTC, leaving ETH without an independent narrative.
$SOL and other public chains are struggling too. The 10-year US Treasury yield is at 5.36%, the highest since 2002. With risk-free returns this high, incremental funds are reluctant to chase volatile assets, and hot narratives lose momentum.
So, the selling pressure isn't from a single operator but a combined force of rate hike expectations, US stock market risk appetite, slowing ETF inflows, and leverage stop-losses. Tomorrow night’s CPI is the decisive factor: if it hits around 3.7%, the 80,000 level will be tested again; if it’s below expectations, there’s a chance to recover 84,000. Until the data is released, tug-of-war remains the main theme.
#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验
#机构持续布局，BTC为何仍承压？
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 Why do you sometimes regret deeply because greed causes profit drawdown,
and other times you miss out on big moves because of fear?
Ultimately, it's because you didn't check the timeframe before opening a position.
For example, is it possible to expect 4-hour candle profits by looking at the 15-minute candles?
If the 15-minute candle move is already over and you haven't closed,
you can only watch your profits evaporate and end up stopped out.
Or, for example, if you look at the 4-hour candles before opening a position but sell hastily before the move finishes,
you'll regret missing out as the market continues as expected.
#CPI and PPI announcements are imminent, and interest rate hike expectations face a test A 6% yield is not a forecast; it’s the “bearing layer missing” circled in red in the foundation survey report. When PIMCO anchors the ten-year U.S. Treasury yield at this figure, any structural engineer should hear the subtext: the load-bearing limit of the entire financial foundation is being recalculated. Energy inflation, fiscal hemorrhaging, forced sell-offs—these three forces act like a continuously overloaded combination of live and wind loads, and the 5.618% winning bid rate at the 30-year auction is just the first harsh reading returned from the static load test of the pile foundation.
In our field, the biggest taboo is treating design drawings as as-built drawings. No matter how smooth the yield curve is drawn in the white paper, once it encounters a seismic zone in funding, the first cracks always appear at connection nodes without redundant design. A subscription multiple of 2.2 billion may seem to stabilize the short-term pile position, but the real settlement risk never lies in a single pile—it’s in the entire shear wall system. When the bond issuance cost, this concrete grade, jumps from C30 to C60, all risk assets anchored to U.S. Treasuries, including equities and crypto assets, must recalculate their seismic resistance rating.
Bitcoin’s framework is relatively honest; its “decentralized” load-bearing system does not rely on stress transmission from any country’s treasury, but its glass curtain wall will still be torn by the interlayer displacement angle of the Nasdaq. And niche assets like $XCH are more like the auxiliary steel structures attached beside the main building; when the main building shakes, they are the first to sense secondary bending moments. The correlation you see is not mysticism—it’s the fundamental whip effect in structural dynamics.
What truly alarms me is the seemingly connected corridor bridge between risk assets—normally an evacuation route, but during resonance, it becomes the weakest layer where cracks first propagate. If a 6% yield truly shifts from a risk scenario to an as-built reality, developers relying on refinancing to survive, miners propping valuations with liquidity, and synthetic assets sustained by anchored narratives will all face a static elastoplastic overturning under doubled design loads. Those that endure won’t be the loudest concepts, but the columns with the most solid reinforcement ratios and best ductility.
Don’t ask if demand can automatically bottom out under high yields; foundation settlement won’t stop just because there are more residents upstairs. The seismic design intensity has changed, and drawings still using old reinforcement codes won’t even pass review. #pimcous10yyield6%riskU.S. stocks are going down, crude oil is pulling up, but the crypto market hasn't immediately followed with a deep drop. The most dangerous move at this time is to directly translate "external environment is bearish" into "short now." @LiangLaobiao has a two-layer judgment on this market: overall, it is still observed as a structure of a rebound followed by a decline, but if the short-term support is not broken for a long time, the rebound may continue, first washing out the shorts who are eager to enter. He does not consider this rise as a confirmed reversal, nor does he assume that a single drop means the market will crash all the way down. The recent market looks more like it is sweeping back and forth around liquidity, going up to make the bulls feel a breakout is coming, then down to make the bears feel the trend has started. Positions opened in the middle of the range often make both sides uncomfortable. First, look at $BTC. Laobiao clearly regards 85,000 as resistance and a watershed. In the short term, observe how far the rebound can go, rather than just focusing on a single question like "can it reach 84,000." In his structural understanding, there has already been a decline before, and now it may be in the rebound process before the next decline; if it never stands back above important levels, and after the rebound breaks key support again, the subsequent decline magnitude is worth watching. This does not mean the third wave is confirmed. He emphasizes that the market often starts from small 15-minute structural changes, gradually expanding into larger structures. A stop in decline and rebound in a small cycle, then breaking through local highs, can support short-term stabilization; but short-term stabilization and a large structural reversal are not the same thing. Conversely, if the price increases volume again to stand back in the original range and confirms by retesting, freeing previously trapped bulls, then the originalChallenge 2000u to over 10,000
Went long on INTC this afternoon, thinking it had bottomed out, but it was still halfway up the mountain. Watched it break down but didn't have the heart to sell. Later, after calmly analyzing, decisively sold on the rebound and opened a short position. Still have to trust my own judgment. If I had stubbornly held onto this INTC, it would have been on track to break 100.ETH struggled back to 2530 after dropping to 2512! A whale has wildly sold 45,000 ETH in a week, while retail investors seem to be catching the falling knife?
On-chain data reveals a big problem:
A certain whale sold another 10,000 ETH (about $19.82 million) in the past 30 minutes, totaling 45,000 ETH sold in the past week, cashing out $92.15 million. Earlier, a wallet associated with the Ethereum Foundation transferred 4,393 ETH (about $11.13 million) to Kraken, and an ancient whale is also continuously offloading.
ETF capital flow is also bearish:
Last week, Ethereum spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $542 million, with BlackRock's ETHA leading with a weekly net outflow of $477 million. The total net asset value of ETFs still stands at $15.71 billion, but funds are steadily withdrawing.
Liquidation data signals downside risk:
If ETH falls below $2,412, the cumulative long position liquidation intensity on major CEXs will reach $635 million. Conversely, if it breaks above $2,655, short position liquidation intensity will also hit $502 million. Both triggers are set.
Key levels:
Resistance above: 2546 → 2601 → 2630; Support below: 2520 → 2468 → 2440. The 100-week EMA support is around 2561, and the current price is still trading below this level.$STRK 这单，50倍空拿出了740%的浮盈，核心就是看懂了“叙事挡不住筹码兑现”。$ETH
0.1268冲顶那根针，量能放得极大，但价格留不住，典型的高位派发。4小时级别连阴砸下来，短线均线全线下压，现价0.0906已经逼近24小时最低点。开仓0.10637摸空，逻辑很直白：盘面还在讲“量子抗性”和L1解锁的故事，但资金已经在借利好跑路。$BTC
山寨币这东西，涨起来靠情绪，跌起来靠筹码。前面从0.04拉上来，获利盘太厚，高位一分歧，下方根本没承接。47亿枚的天量换手，本质就是获利盘疯狂兑现，市场不愿再给高估值。
740%是市场给的，不是盲目扛单。50倍杠杆能睡得着，是因为清楚高位压力已现，情绪在退潮。现在看0.0896前低，破位还有空间，不破就分批落袋。做交易，别听故事，看资金往哪流。#CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 🌪️ When Dan Ivascyn from Pacific Investment Management Company threw the number “6%” on the table, my first reaction wasn’t U.S. Treasuries, but the kind of disturbance cloud over the Northwest Pacific that looks like it has only 40-knot winds yet jumps three categories to become a super typhoon within 12 hours. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield hitting 6% is not a baseline scenario; it’s a "Patricia-level" energy inflation cyclone combined with a fiscal high-pressure ridge—anomalously warm warm pool, excellent upper-level divergence, almost zero vertical wind shear, all conditions feeding latent heat into this low-pressure system.
📡 But note, forecasters never draw conclusions from a single model. The $22 billion 30-year Treasury auction on October 8 had a winning yield of 5.618% and a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.54. What does this number mean in surface observations? It means "the pressure gradient is starting to tighten." A 2.54 bid-to-cover ratio indicates a substantial amount of capital is still willing to enter at yields above 5.6%. This is the convergence zone ahead of a cold front, not a crash signal, but a fierce collision between bulls and bears on the front line—high yields themselves are generating demand.
🌡️ What really needs monitoring is the moisture channel. Energy inflation is water vapor flux, fiscal pressure is sustained subsidence, forced selling is vertical wind shear. As long as these three remain coupled, yields will erupt upward like a supercell being split. But when the 10-year approaches 6%, the "felt temperature" of equity markets and risk assets will drop sharply—financing costs are that dry, cold air pouring down from the stratosphere, and stock and digital asset valuation models will automatically lower their discount windows.
⚡ As for the linkage between tokenized U.S. equities and Bitcoin, I see it as a frontal passage process: first, the most sensitive growth stocks cool down, then the high-volatility stratification of crypto assets is triggered, and finally, funds seek a convergence line as a safe haven. But note—if high yields themselves can attract enough buying, that’s a "dry cold front," not "warm moist instability"—strong winds, cooling, but no rain, meaning no comprehensive liquidity drought. The radar echo patterns of these two paths are completely different.
🛰️ Currently, I’m watching a key indicator: whether the bid-to-cover ratio falls below 2.3 in subsequent auctions. Once it breaks below, it means the convergence zone has fractured, supply side starts to dominate, and 6% is no longer a risk scenario but an observed reality. Until then, the high-pressure ridge remains overhead, and the market still has a breathing window. #pimcous10yyield6%riskRidiculous! For the same ZEC ETF, some people pay a 2.5% annual management fee, while others might only need to pay 0.25%?
That's a tenfold difference! If I bought the former, seeing the fee rate of the new product would probably really throw me off.
Recently, Winklevoss applied for a new Zcash ETF with a proposed management fee of only 0.25%, whereas the existing ZCSH fee is 2.5%.
But then I thought, this might not be as simple as everyone thinks.
If the new ETF is finally approved and listed, the low fee could indeed attract funds, but how much of that comes from original ZCSH investors switching over, and how much is new money buying ZEC for the first time? The difference between these two numbers is huge.
For example, someone sells $1 million of the old fund and then buys $1 million of the new fund. The new fund looks like it has a nice inflow, but in reality, the entire $ZEC investment product market hasn't gained an additional $1 million in demand.
So now I don't really want to hear about “institutions positioning in ZEC” anymore; I want to see if there is actually new money coming in.
The new ETF application is definitely worth watching, but applying doesn't mean approval, and a low fee doesn't guarantee fund inflow.
I'll keep monitoring this and stay cautious in the short term. Only when I see sustained net inflows in the entire ZEC ETF market will I be more willing to consider increasing my position.Don't blindly short!!
BTC current price is about 82900, the 4-hour bearish trend signal just extinguished, moving averages are still bearish but momentum is gone. Daily chart is oscillating, the key is: only consider downside if it can't hold 82280; if it recovers 83100/83530, the bears take a break. Don't lock in direction before inflation. $BTC $ETH 永续100倍多单，2,500.86开，现2,530，浮盈+116.51%。
逻辑很简单：2,500.86 附近反复探底不破，每次下跌都被快速拉回，下影线越来越长，卖盘明显衰竭。等到放量突破短期压力，右侧确认，跟多进去。100倍，止损 2,450。这一波涨得比较流畅，完全没给回踩机会，收益直接翻了1倍多。
现在把止损挪到 2,510 锁利。上方 2,580 如果放量突破，还能再拿一拿。$BTC $DOGE #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 $WLD has already entered the oversold zone, but "it's time to rebound" and "it has bottomed out" are completely different things.
Current price is 0.5227, 24h -10.48%; 1-hour is weak, 4-hour is weak, volume is about 0.29 times the average volume of the last 20 bars.
I break it down into two scenarios: A, breaking through 0.5727, confirming the short-term structure; B, falling below 0.5198, original judgment invalid, next observation point shifts to 0.4783.
No preset answers, just watch which condition happens first. Which scenario do you think is more likely to occur first, A or B?
The above is market observation and does not constitute investment advice. This is from Coin Circle NiuNiu.Has the “second shoe” for $OKB dropped?
Market news indicates that OKX and the NYSE parent company’s joint venture has filed with the SEC. If this progresses smoothly, over 60 tokenized US stock products will be priced in stablecoins, with the settlement layer connected to a permissioned Uniswap v4 pool on X Layer. The narrative for OKB is shifting from “exchange token” to “global stock settlement infrastructure token”; following the financing earlier this month, this is another key milestone. Coupled with the launch of OKX Money, OKX is also exploring banking deposits and payment entry points.
On the charts, OKB has repeatedly found support around the 125 level, seen by some funds as a signal of accumulation. I tend to continue holding, watching to see if it can challenge last year’s highs above 200. The logic is strong, but there are many variables: SEC approval, compliance frameworks, liquidity depth, and acceptance of tokenized stocks all require ongoing monitoring.
The story is unfolding, and position sizing and patience are equally important. This does not constitute investment advice.
#CPI and PPI releases are imminent, testing rate hike expectations
#OKX completes strategic financing at a $25 billion valuation
#Trading Voice: Your experience deserves to be heard
rephrase $STRK 这单50x空，开在0.10341，现价砸到0.09025，浮盈直接干到638%。从昨晚303%到今天638%，短短几小时又多吃了一倍，这自由落体算是被我全程按住了。
看这4小时图，均线完全空头排列：MA5（0.09917）、MA10（0.10800）全在头顶压着，价格连MA5都碰不到，典型的弱市无反弹。0.12680见顶后一路阴跌，今天最低探到0.08969，离前低0.06857那波又近了一步。量能缩到5.8M，说明下跌开始缩量，但空头趋势没坏，缩量阴跌最磨多头心态。
638%在50x下安全垫确实厚，但我比谁都清楚这玩意儿回撤多快——前面多单695%都能变空单，现在空单638%也不能飘。上方0.099（MA5）和0.103（开仓区）是压力带，站不回0.103空头就稳；下方0.08969刚探过底，跌破看0.08整数关，再往下就是0.06857前低。给大家看看目前$ETH 面临的潜在f险
截至10月9日ETF累计净流入367万ETH，ETHA（BlackRock）占358万；但短线有抛压，F2Pool联创Chun Wang向Binance转2160 ETH约552万刀。
风险面更值得盯：现货ETF上周净流出5.42亿刀，ETHA占4.77亿，结束三周流入；
美国现货ETH ETF连续九天流出，10月累计约6.35亿，整体近7亿。
基金会相关钱包向Kraken存4393 ETH约1113万刀，原10年前收59751 ETH。
大家还是多注意仓位控制！$BTC #CPI与PPI公布在即，加息预期迎考验 🟡 $SOL Support Bounce Attempt Bearish Momentum Still Dominant.
Leverage: 5x Max
Trade Setup: Short
Entry: $109.20 – $109.80
SL: $110.60
TP1: $108.35
TP2: $107.80
TP3: $107.20
SOL faced strong rejection near $113.40 and dropped sharply to $108.35, showing sellers remain in control despite a minor recovery. A rejection from the $109.20–$109.80 entry zone could favor further downside toward the targets, while a sustained move above resistance would weaken the setup.
Sell and Trade $SOL #Russia and Ukraine may reach an "energy ceasefire" agreement, progress to be confirmed
Russia relaxes diesel exports, but oil prices only slightly fall: CL down 0.10%, BZ down 0.22%. The risk in the Strait of Hormuz remains, and the market is cautious.
Diesel is the industrial lifeblood; Russia relaxing exports theoretically increases supply and eases inflation. But the chokehold at Hormuz still exists, and the market fears a black swan event. High oil prices fluctuate at elevated levels, which is most painful for the Federal Reserve—unable to suppress inflation, unable to stop rate hikes.
For the crypto space, high oil prices → high inflation → high interest rates → liquidity tightening, this chain has never changed. But every energy crisis reminds the world: the dollar-oil system is fragile. As sanctioned countries increasingly embrace crypto assets, Bitcoin’s long-term narrative is actually strengthened.
Short-term pain, long-term pressure. Oil price volatility is just the surface; the real key is the monetary system struggle. Keep an eye on the Middle East, and also on your positions. $ETH $BTC Just went through a thrilling "profit washout"! More than half of the profits were given back, and the crypto market flipped in an instant. This is the darkest moment that tests mindset and defensive discipline the most; steady your position to survive till the end.
$BNB: [Defense line under test]
Entry price 750.2, current price 747.2. Floating loss 29.28U, ROI -7.99%. Margin 366.09U, margin rate 659.8%
BNB has fallen below the entry price, and the overall market is under pressure. At this time, avoid blindly holding positions; focus on whether 741.98 can form effective support.
$BTC: [Retreating to critical defense line]
Entry price 82,582.2, current price 82,706, ROI 2.99%, margin 207.41U, margin rate 1,136.85%
On-chain analysis firm CryptoQuant warned that the $84,000 to $85,000 range is the resistance zone with the most concentrated chips, with heavy selling pressure above.
$ETH: [Still the strongest main force]
Entry price 2,492.92, current price 2,529.92, floating profit 85.95U, ROI 29.68%, margin 289.85U, margin rate 1,421.02%
The big waves sift the sand; this kind of market is exactly the moment to test the trading system.
#VoiceOfTrading: Your experience deserves to be heard
#How to upgrade blockchain security under AI and quantum threats?
#Russia-Ukraine may reach an "energy ceasefire" agreement, progress pending confirmation Three transactions totaling over three billion dollars, while the target companies have only raised two hundred million combined. Stripe, Mastercard, and Circle are not paying for technology, but for dollar accounts, payment networks, and compliance qualifications—in other words, licenses. On the other hand, stablecoin trading volume has been called close to Visa's, but the actual amount used in real-world payments is only 390 billion, about twenty times less. Most volume is just moving on-chain among themselves.
$BTC
$ETH 😂 $W This wave was really an unexpected surprise!
After placing the order, I didn’t keep watching, but when I came back, the profit had actually tripled!
If I had kept watching the market, I probably would have cashed out early at 50%, and wouldn’t have gotten what I have now 😂
Sometimes it’s not that your own operation is so skillful, but the market just happened to give the opportunity.
But this kind of luck is rare, so it’s true profit only when you take it off the table!
When you trade, do you prefer to watch the market closely and take profits in time, or set a target and let the profit run on its own?👇
#CPIPPIHikeWatch
#RussiaUkraineTruceWatch
#TSMCOct15Earnings 🔥 Five-year low.
Just saw the Bitcoin options volatility data and was stunned for a moment. How boring is the market now? Even those betting on direction are too lazy to place bets.
Looking back at history, when volatility is suppressed to such an extreme, there are usually two scenarios afterward: either a big bullish or bearish candle suddenly explodes, or it continues to be dead calm, grinding until everyone forgets about it.
Anyway, my strategy is simple. I haven't touched my spot base position, closed my contracts long ago, and still hold U. At times like this, betting on direction is no different from throwing darts blindfolded. I'll wait for it to choose a direction itself, and then follow after the breakout.
How about you? Still opening positions recently? 👇$BTC