Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
中东在打仗,美国第三支航母打击群开向波斯湾,油价年内涨了80%以上。放在任何一本教科书里,这都该是黄金和BTC的“避险高光时刻”。 结果呢? 黄金周五收在3995美元,一周跌了4%,创6月以来最差单周表现。盘中一度砸到3975美元,连4000这个心理关口都没守住。 BTC更干脆。24日直接跌穿8万美元,24小时清算8亿,21.3万人被强平。一天后又爬回81000附近,像个不知道该往哪走的醉汉。 战争没有把资金赶进“避险资产”。战争把资金赶进了美债。 10年期美债收益率周四跌破5%,报4.961%,一个月来首次。 一个能生息的东西,收益率在往下走,资金还在往里挤。 一个不生息的东西,价格在往下掉,资金还在往外跑。 Berenberg分析师给这个现象起了个很客气的名字,叫“值得关注的背离”。翻译成大白话就是:避险资产在避险行情里下跌,这事不太对劲。 更狠的是他们补的那一刀:上一次黄金在美债收益率大跌时表现这么烂,要追溯到2008年12月——全球金融危机最深的那个月。 为什么黄金和BTC一起挨打? 芝商所首席经济学家Erik Norland一句话点破了根子:今年贵金属下跌的最大驱动因素,是市场预期从降息转向了加息。 降息的时候,持有黄金的机会成本低,不生息无所谓。一旦加息预期回来,持有黄金的成本被抬高,而美债那边开始给你付利息。 钱不傻。钱只是走了。 Berenberg还补了一个细节:黄金过去一年被当成了投机性资产。1月冲到5400美元的历史高位,现在从高点回落超过五分之一,投机盘正在离场。 BTC没有“投机盘离场”的借口。它从头到尾都是一个没有现金流、没有收益率、只有波动的东西。 在这个利率环境里,黄金至少还有“曾经是避险”的惯性,BTC连这层惯性都没有。 避险资产没有被抛弃。是“无息”这个属性,正在被系统性折价。 黄金跌,不是因为世界不够乱。BTC跌,不是因为区块链不够去中心化。 是因为在同一个避险的夜晚,有人把钱放进了能生息的资产里,然后关灯睡觉了。 战争没有让资金涌向黄金和BTC。战争让资金涌向了美债。 这不是避险资产的失败。这是“无息”这个属性,在当前宏观下的系统性折价。 $BTC $XAU $BZ
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Bitcoin hasn't escaped any of the past four midterm elections. In 2010, it retraced 72%. In 2014, 65%. In 2018, 52%. In 2022, 27%. What's even more painful is Q4. In three of the past four midterm election years, Q4 posted negative returns — down 16.7% in 2014, 42% in 2018, and 14.75% in 2022. Voting is on November 3rd, less than 10 days away. It's not shameful to be anxious. The data is right here; ignoring it is self-deception. In 2014, 2018, and 2022, the bear market lows all appeared after the election. The lows were 71, 38, and 13 days after election day in January 2015, December 2018, and November 2022, respectively. What about this year? The low was on July 1st at $57,850, 125 days before the election. By October 22nd, the price had already rebounded to $81,455, about 40% up from the low. The market has already priced in the "election bottom" early. Using the script of "bottom only after the election" now is applying the wrong timeline. Ali Charts clearly states: around $73,000 is close to the average purchase cost of short-term holders. In an established bull market, deep pullbacks often find support around this level. Coincidentally, Strategy holds 848,000 BTC at an average cost of $75,446. Short-term holders' cost is $73,000, institutional cost is $75,446. Both figures cluster in the same range. The real damage of the election curse isn't in the word "election" itself, but that it may act as a catalyst for the price to test the shared cost zone of $73,000–$75,000. If it falls there but doesn't break, the bull market continues; if it breaks, that's the real problem. BTC's intraday low today was $79,146, already below $80,000, down about 2.7% in 24 hours. The liquidation heatmap shows $80,000–$80,844 as a dense liquidation zone, with about $3.6 billion long positions near $79,000 below. $80,000 is the first gate. $78,000 is the second. $73,000–$75,000 is the final gate testing the true strength. CoinDesk's judgment is worth serious consideration: Bitcoin's midterm weakness reflects more its own market cycle than the election itself. The election is just a date on the calendar. The cost zone is real money on the ledger. Elections cause volatility; cost determines survival. It can drop on November 3rd, but $73,000–$75,000 cannot be lost. $BTC $ETH $SOL

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!