Orbit Post Sitemap

First, the resistance levels: the first big hurdle is 82000. Previously, this area saw intense battles between bulls and bears, with heavy losses on both sides. If the price rebounds to this level, it must hold with strong volume. If it spikes up but then falls back, it means the trapped positions above haven't been fully digested. Above that is 87374, a previous high point. This is a tough barrier and a true strong resistance zone. To reopen upward momentum, this level must be broken and held. $QQQ This drop has indeed been quite severe From 730 all the way down to 640, a decline of over 12%, now rebounding to around 657. Looking at the 1-hour and 4-hour charts, my judgment is: there are short-term signs of a bottom, but it's not yet time to call a reversal. The 1-hour chart has already stabilized sideways, MACD is warming up, indicating that panic selling has temporarily eased. But the 4-hour chart is still pressured by EMA10 and EMA20, with lower highs continuously forming, the bearish trend has not reversed yet. Next, I’m focusing on three key levels: ① 660—668 The first short-term resistance; whether it can hold above here is crucial. Breaking through and holding steady would give the rebound a chance to continue. ② 680—685 An important previous resistance zone, also near the 1-hour EMA200. If it really reaches here, it means the recovery strength is not weak. ③ 640—650 Short-term support area. If 640 is broken again, be cautious of further bottom testing. My view: This round of tech stock adjustment worries the market not just about short-term news, but whether the high valuations can hold. I don’t believe the long-term logic of tech stocks has completely changed because of this drop. Personally, I lean toward a decent rebound coming later, but now is not the time to go all in. My strategy is to wait for stabilization and build positions gradually, rather than chasing after a single bullish candle. Brothers, what do you think? Is this Nasdaq drop a golden pit, or is the decline just beginning?LITUSDT recently experienced a high of 3.9863 and has entered a wide-range consolidation phase. The current price is reported at 3.3146, up 3.97% in 24 hours, showing some signs of stabilization. From a technical perspective, the MACD indicator shows a high-level death cross pattern, and the STICK histogram is negative, indicating a short-term weakening of upward momentum. Meanwhile, the SAR indicator is currently above the price, suggesting resistance overhead for investors. However, from a longer time frame, its 90-day and 180-day gains are as high as 43.34% and 248.79%, respectively, demonstrating strong long-term growth potential. The RSI indicator is currently hovering around 50, in a relatively balanced zone. Overall, LITUSDT is consolidating at a high level, digesting the previous rapid rise. In the short term, it may seek direction within the 2.5900 to 3.9863 range, but the mid-term positive trend remains intact. Investors should remain patient and pay attention to breakthroughs of key support and resistance levels. The recent drop in the US stock market is truly nerve-wracking! The S&P fell 4%, and the semiconductor index plummeted over 10%... Many friends are asking me if this is a good opportunity to buy the dip? Listen to my advice: don't act yet, wait and see. There's a famous saying in the financial market: "You never know where the bottom is." In such extreme market conditions, blindly buying the dip is like grabbing fire, and there's a high chance you'll face a "critical hit." For us ordinary people, it's more important to preserve capital than to always try to buy at the lowest point. Let the dust settle a bit longer; it's not too late to consider entering the market once it has fully bottomed out. $SNDK $xNVDA $TSLA #Oklo推进核电项目建设，商业化进展受关注 At 3 a.m., getting ready to shut down the computer and go to sleep, I casually checked the market! BTC is still struggling around 75,000, ETH's rebound is weak, and UNI is also tugging back and forth near 7 dollars! The US stock market just experienced a big drop, ETF funds are still flowing out, when will this wave of volatility end? First, look at $BTC: estimated at 75,650 USD US October nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000, exceeding expectations, the market is betting again on the Fed tightening policy. Coupled with the previous tech stock sell-off, risk appetite remains weak. BTC spot ETF had a net outflow of about 51.7 million USD in the latest day. Short-term support to watch is 75,000; if broken, look at 73,000; rebound first targets 77,000. Next, look at $ETH: estimated at 2,228 USD ETH is still weaker than BTC, spot ETF funds have not yet continuously flowed back. Previously, leveraged longs were liquidated en masse, market confidence needs time to recover. Short-term support to watch is 2,200; only by stabilizing above 2,300 can there be a chance for recovery. Finally, look at $UNI: estimated at 6.98 USD UNI is oscillating around 7 dollars, the DeFi sector has not yet formed sustained buying. Short-term support to watch is 6.7; only breaking through 7.2 will there be a chance to strengthen further. A few final words: Strong employment data, weak ETF demand, the market is still digesting pressure. What’s more important now is to confirm the bottom, not to rush to guess it! Do you think BTC will break below 75,000 first, or UNI will break above 7.2 first? #美军再度打击伊朗，霍尔木兹海峡重开仍存分歧 Crypto Mini Class — Rising Three Methods $BTC The Rising Three Methods often appear in the middle of an uptrend, mainly serving to shake out weak hands and continue the rise! Standard structure: a large bullish candle + three small bearish candles that do not break the previous bullish candle's low + a confirming large bullish candle Signal: bullish consolidation and shakeout, a bullish signal Practical use: aggressive traders place orders near support on the third bearish candle, while conservative traders wait for the final large bullish candle confirmation. The main force uses three consecutive bearish candles to exchange chips, raising the market's average holding cost to prepare for the subsequent rally.Starting from 1997, the year Hong Kong returned to China, I have tracked $XAU and $XAG up to now and found a quite interesting phenomenon! In nearly 30 years, gold has accumulated an increase of about 1081%, silver about 1021%, and the final returns are surprisingly close! But looking at the intermediate trends, they really offer two completely different investment experiences! Gold is relatively more stable, while silver often experiences sharp surges and drops. Especially in 2011 and the recent market cycle, those who bought at the highs probably had to have particularly strong nerves! So I think, when investing in precious metals, choosing between gold or silver is important, but timing the purchase is equally crucial. If the next few years really enter a relatively long bear market, I would be quite willing to pay attention to opportunities for gold and silver at low levels. Of course, a bear market may last for several years, so bottom-fishing shouldn’t be rushed. After all, buying good assets at high prices can also be quite tormenting!On Friday, the US stock market breathed a sigh of relief. Have the contract bulls really relaxed? After the tech stock rebound, those holding perpetual contracts still need to watch the rates and open interest. The S&P 500 rose about 0.3% on Friday, down 2.7% for the week. An example on the market is $LINK: around $10.82 at 12:00 UTC on November 7, 24h -0.37%; perpetual open interest across three exchanges about $168 million. The price has not independently broken through; subsequent spot trading needs to be observed. At the same time, $ADA: about $0.1832, 24h -1.83%; perpetual open interest across three exchanges about $126 million. Low price does not equal low risk; absorption must be watched first. So don’t rush to conclusions: if the rate is still positive but the price hesitates, the short term may just be catching a breath; one shouldn’t cover costs with a single bullish candle in US stocks. Next, we need to observe whether the US stock market will continue to strengthen at next week’s open, and then see if the crypto market has spot relay; the two markets cannot be forcibly counted as the same candlestick. Are you more afraid of missing the rebound, or of being consumed by sideways movement while paying the rate? #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 Tron Inc. (Nasdaq ticker: TRON) has increased its holdings by 155,372 $TRX, bringing its total holdings to over 722.1 million TRX. The publicly listed company Tron Inc. continues to accumulate TRX at an average price of about $0.3218. • Additional TRX purchased: 155,372 TRX (approximately $49,470) • Average purchase price: $0.3218/TRX, lower than the previous purchase price of $0.3327. • Current total inventory: over 722.1 million TRX I have observed some sporadic purchases totaling less than $50,000, which is almost negligible compared to the over 722 million TRX treasury. I believe this is likely just weekly steady buying to maintain treasury market expectations, insufficient to significantly drive up the price of TRX. I think this is only a slight psychological signal, not enough to indicate real demand. People can't help but wonder whether Tron Inc.'s continuous buying spree is a sign of long-term accumulation or merely a show.$ETH H4 chart is weak, but the D1 chart still shows an upward trend. Price ETH: $2,244.37, 24-hour change rate is relatively stable. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily chart closed at 39.48. The downtrend remains evident; a rebound requires more signals. The bot indicator shows a bear market on the 4-hour chart, but a bull market on the daily chart. The short-term trend is inconsistent with the daily pattern. The exponential moving average on the daily chart also does not align with this trend. Support 2,206: Closing below this value on H4 will confirm the loss of support.Participation rate returns to 61.9%, can the crypto community breathe a sigh of relief? Employment numbers increased slightly, and more people are participating in the labor force, but the interest rate story hasn't become any simpler. Professional and business services added about 70,000 jobs, with recruitment unevenly distributed. Turning attention to $BTC: around $75,917 at 12:00 UTC on November 7, 24h -0.21%; 8h funding rate +0.0013%. Relatively stable, but the follow-up still depends on spot market support. In contrast, $ADA: about $0.1832, 24h -1.83%; perpetual open interest across three exchanges about $126 million. Declines do not automatically generate a catch-up rally. I think labor participation and employment growth should be read together; the demand for capital in high-yield assets may still increase. If the funding rate cools down but prices remain stable, it is more favorable for observing the quality of the rebound than simply raising leverage. Do you think this market cycle will first trade on employment resilience, or will interest rates remain elevated for longer? #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 "Long consolidation inevitably leads to a drop" is not mysticism; it's four factors stacked together Let's start with the conclusion: In a bear market structure, sideways consolidation is not a signal of a bottom, but a way to trade time for downward space. The longer the consolidation, the higher the probability and depth of a breakdown. The reason is not sentiment, but four real forces: chip supply, liquidity, time cost, and breakdown mechanism. 1. Clarify first: Bull market consolidation is accumulation, bear market consolidation is consumption - Bull market consolidation: incremental funds support the bottom, chips exchange hands sideways, leading to an upward breakout; - Bear market consolidation: no incremental funds, only existing supply fighting each other. The "balance" during consolidation relies on both bulls and bears unwilling to move first; once one side lets go, the scale immediately tips. Bear market consolidation is essentially a stalemate where sellers wait for better prices and buyers wait for lower prices. Usually, the stalemate does not end with buyers winning. 2. Four hard mechanisms behind "long consolidation inevitably leads to a drop" Mechanism 1: Supply curve continuously shifts right (the hardest one) The characteristic of consolidation is stable price, but unlocking continues as usual. STRK's release is written into the rules on a schedule, with a fixed monthly amount entering circulation, not paused due to poor market conditions. In economic terms: - Supply keeps increasing; - Demand (buy orders) decreases rather than increases in a bear market; - Result: equilibrium price can only move downward. This is not a sentiment judgment but pure arithmetic. Each additional month of consolidation adds a new batch of chips becoming "sellable volume." Time is on the sellers' side. Mechanism 2: Volume declines → order book thins → breakdown becomes more fragile During consolidation, trading volume naturally shrinks, market makers reduce order depth, and cross-market capital allocation decreases. The consequence of a thin order book is that the same sell order can cause twice the price drop. So you will see a typical pattern: low-volume consolidation → suddenly a large bearish candle. This is not a sudden negative event but an inevitable result of liquidity being drained. Mechanism 3: Consolidation turns trapped holders from "passively waiting to break even" into "actively wanting to sell" The longer the time, the thicker the cost concentration area. - At first, holders want to "wait to break even"; - After three to five months of consolidation, the mindset changes to "I'll sell as soon as it rebounds to this price"; - Later, it becomes "I'll sell at any slight rebound." The same batch of chips changes from passive resistance to active selling pressure. This is the most hidden harm of consolidation: it doesn't create losses but transforms people's psychology. Mechanism 4: Bulls' patience has a cost During consolidation, holders earn no returns, but opportunity cost accumulates daily. Watching other assets move while theirs stagnate, faith gradually erodes. "Long consolidation inevitably leads to a drop" becomes self-fulfilling because enough people reach the same conclusion simultaneously and reduce positions together. 3. Why the probability of an upward breakout is much lower than a downward breakdown This is an energy asymmetry, not a matter of opinion: Table Upward breakout requires | Downward breakdown requires Incremental funds entering | A medium-sized sell order New narrative truly landing | Breaking below the lower range Market risk appetite recovery | Triggering forced deleveraging Unlocked chips willing to lock up | Nothing needed All three are needed for upward breakout; only one for downward breakdown. This is the fundamental reason bear market consolidation almost inevitably resolves downward. 4. The breakdown after long consolidation is often more violent than the first wave The reason is simple: during consolidation, stop-loss and forced liquidation orders accumulate at the lower range. Once broken, these orders trigger simultaneously, causing a stampede. So long consolidation breakdown is not a "slow decline," but a fake breakout to lure bulls followed by a swift breakdown. The purpose of the "fake breakout" is to let the last batch of bottom-fishers enter and take chips.#Anthropic still plans IPO in November, investors lower valuation expectations Is the "CLARITY Act" doomed? With Democrats controlling both chambers, is BTC a safe haven or a correction trap? With Democrats controlling both chambers of Congress, the advancement of the "CLARITY Act" faces increased difficulty, and the SEC's tough approach of "enforcement instead of regulation" is likely to continue. 🚨 Market logic under regulation Altcoins face new clouds: Without clear boundary legislation, interest-bearing, controlled, or dividend-type tokens will again face SEC "securitization" lawsuit risks, and projects with incomplete decentralization will undergo premium clearance. DeFi yields under pressure: Increasing restrictions on stablecoin reserves and interest mechanisms directly suppress on-chain DeFi underlying yields. BTC/ETH resist regulation: Their ownerless nature brings resilience, with funds flowing back from altcoins to BTC as a safe haven. Defensive strategy: Reduce long-tail altcoin positions, concentrate on BTC/ETH. Safe haven direction: Temporarily avoid unaudited on-chain interest protocols and RWA derivatives. Key indicator: Closely watch the Federal Reserve's rate cut pace; liquidity is the key to the market. Open your portfolio list and check the proportion of altcoin positions relative to total funds. $BTC $ETH $SOL To be honest, the moment I saw the non-farm payroll data, my first reaction wasn’t to rush to short, but rather that the market was about to start tossing and turning again. New job additions far exceeded expectations, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. With the US economy holding up so well, the Federal Reserve naturally feels more confident to continue raising interest rates. The probability of a rate hike in December suddenly surged above 75%, which is definitely not good news for the crypto space. I also feel uncomfortable chasing short positions now. The non-farm payroll card has already been played openly, and the market is falling where it should. What’s truly critical next is the CPI on the evening of November 10. If inflation continues to exceed expectations, a Fed rate hike will basically be a given, pushing the dollar and US Treasury yields even higher, making life even harder for BTC. But if the CPI unexpectedly cools down, the script will instantly reverse. The more people bet on shorts in advance, the stronger the rebound might be once the data is released. So the market these days looks like an opportunity, but it’s actually full of traps. Bulls don’t have the funds to back them, and shorts are crowded on the same side. Whoever rushes in first might get slapped first. You can lean bearish, but don’t get carried away. You can watch the show, but don’t rush to be the main actor. The market loves to punish those who think they understand a bit of logic and dare to put all their chips on it.Non-farm payrolls look good, but the working people's experience is worsening Hourly wages increased by only 3.1% year-on-year, the slowest since 2021, mostly not keeping up with inflation. The number of people forced to take gig jobs due to economic reasons has jumped to a six-month high, and the median duration for the unemployed to find new jobs has stretched to 11.9 weeks. The unemployment rate is low, but money doesn't last, and finding jobs is getting harder. The Federal Reserve looks at the numbers, voters look at their bills, and the two sides see different things.#软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ 📊 In the early hours of November 6 Beijing time, the US stock market suddenly plunged: the Nasdaq Composite Index fell 5.52%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plummeted 12.25%, and about ¥21 trillion RMB evaporated overnight in the US stock market. 1️⃣ The direct trigger for this plunge was the Democratic Party winning control of both houses of Congress and multiple governorships, with some elected officials explicitly advocating restrictions on data center expansion. The newly elected Democratic governor of Texas proposed continuing to suspend approvals for new data centers until the state legislature establishes rules to protect local residents, also stating that residents should not bear the extra electricity costs generated by data centers and that tax incentives for such companies should be stopped. 2️⃣ If such restrictive policies are extended, the project approval and power connection cycles for data centers will be significantly lengthened, delaying the opening of server rooms, postponing revenue from computing power leasing, slowing subsequent expansion progress, and potentially pushing back or reducing planned chip procurement. The future revenue and profit expectations of chip and server manufacturers will need to be recalculated. There is already a real-world reference: according to Bloomberg, Microsoft has abandoned the option to further expand a data center project in Texas, and the power connection for that project is still awaiting approval. 3️⃣ Previously, related stocks had been betting on the rapid construction of server rooms, continuous increases in chip orders, and steady profit growth. Now that construction is stalled, the previously maintained high valuations are naturally hard to sustain. Manufacturers have not yet announced their next quarter earnings, but stock prices have already fallen ahead.These three coins, the better the K-line looks, the deeper the pit Newbies look at the K-line, veterans look at the chips. The risk of some coins can't even be contained by the bearish candlesticks on the chart. $ONE no longer pretends — cross-shard vulnerability led to the issuance of tens of trillions of tokens, the project team directly "pulled the plug" on the seven-year-old mainnet, migrating to Ethereum to focus on AI video. Coupled with the old debt of a $100 million cross-chain bridge hack, the market cap is only in the tens of millions. This is not a correction, it's endgame liquidation, liquidity can go to zero at any time. $AKE's script is called "thin market slaughter." Total supply is 100 billion, only 22.8% circulating, 77 billion locked up hanging overhead. A single-day 50% pump is not a market, it's a trap. Low circulation and high control, dumping happens faster than pumping, retail investors entering are the last to get hit. $PIEVERSE dies from narrative exhaustion. New coin hype supports the price, but depth is paper-thin. When the story ends, massive unlocking of early low-cost chips happens, and those wanting to exit can't find counterparties. Technical analysis tells you "oversold," fundamentals tell you "stay away." For these three, newbies avoiding them is a win. #美股暴跌后科技股反弹，纳指周线仍跌约3.4% "This wave, the pain point is right above our heads" $BTC's current market really has a bit of that "crazy beauty" vibe (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧ The most eye-catching scene on the chart: the short liquidation volume is about 5 times that of the longs. In other words, once the market pushes upward, shorts are more easily harvested in large numbers. Below? Around $74K–$73K, there's only a small cluster of long liquidation liquidity left, like crumbs in a corner that haven't been swept clean; while the bigger "pain point" has quietly shifted upward (￣▽￣)~* So don't be quick to make definitive calls in the short term. It's not impossible for the price to break below $75K again and sweep liquidity once more. But this move looks more like a final shakeout: first shaking off the undecided chips, then turning back to break upward to harvest the large liquidity stacked above our heads (｀・ω・´) My bias is simple: limited space below, a stronger story above. The real play might not be a continued crash, but a surge upward after the shakeout. When the market goes crazy, don't be scared off by a single needle, and don't mistake a shakeout for the end. Of course, the market always punishes arrogance, so position management still needs to be steady ( •̀ ω •́ )✧ #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 #伯克希尔巨额现金储备，财报将披露最新动向 Berkshire's Q3 earnings released: cash reserves reached a record high of $377.4 billion as of the end of September; single-quarter buybacks hit $9.6 billion, the highest this year, with a total of $14.4 billion repurchased in the first three quarters, accelerating from $235 million in Q1. However, operating profit was $12.7 billion, down 5.8% year-over-year, mainly dragged down by a 43% plunge in insurance underwriting profit.‌‌ Cash piled up to nearly 30% of total assets, yet buybacks are accelerating—this is not a contradiction, but a signal. In Abel's first full year as CEO, he is more willing to deploy cash than his predecessor, but the nearly $380 billion ammunition still points to the same judgment: quality acquisition targets meeting standards are scarce, so rather than buying indiscriminately, it's better to repurchase own shares. Against the backdrop of AI trading retreat and the S&P dropping 2.68% for the week, Berkshire's stock price rose 5% counter to the trend, showing the flow of defensive capital is quite honest.‌‌ BTC is currently around 76,000, also under pressure amid AI retreat and tightening liquidity. For positions, stop loss below 75,000; for no positions, wait for a pullback to 75,000-75,500 with volume contraction and stabilization before considering. Berkshire's $377.4 billion will not flow directly into the crypto space, but it tells you one thing: the most seasoned money is choosing to wait now, not chase highs. $BTC $ETH $SNDK Someone else asked: With the Middle East conflict escalating like this, Saudi Arabia conducting over a hundred airstrikes in 24 hours, shouldn't safe-haven funds be flowing into Bitcoin and gold? This old script of "war boosts safe-haven assets" basically failed this time. The logic is clear if you follow it: Middle East escalation pushes oil prices up with a war premium, inflation expectations rise again, so central banks are even less willing to cut interest rates. The Bank of England just raised rates by 25 basis points this week, and the market now prices an 80% chance of a Fed rate hike in December. So this round of war is priced by the market not as a safe-haven event, but as a "reason for rate hikes." The result is that gold and $BTC often fall together, rather than rise together. Stop using war as your bullish lifeline.#After the US stock market crash, tech stocks rebound, but the Nasdaq weekly chart still falls about 3.4% On November 6, tech stocks rebounded from a sharp sell-off, with the Nasdaq closing up 1.09%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index soaring 4.2%, AMD rising over 11%, and Nvidia up nearly 3%. However, the Nasdaq still fell 3.4% for the week, the S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, and both the Nasdaq and S&P recorded their fourth consecutive week of declines. On Thursday, the "Seven Giants" lost $1 trillion in market value in a single day.‌ The core contradiction is that the data driving the rebound and suppressing the weekly performance is the same. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 165,000 in October, more than twice the expected 65,000, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.1%. Strong employment reinforced the narrative of a "soft landing" for the economy, supporting earnings resilience; but at the same time, the probability of a rate hike in December jumped from 67% to 80%, meaning the pressure of interest rates on overvalued tech stocks has not eased.‌ Invesco's chief strategist bluntly stated that compared to the midterm elections, rising interest rates are the biggest risk facing AI spending growth, and the adjustment may continue.‌ BTC is under pressure in tandem, currently around 76,000, with support at 75,500 and resistance at 78,000. Positions should set stop-losses below 75,000; those without positions should not mistake a single-day rebound for a reversal, wait for a pullback to 75,500 with reduced volume to stabilize before watching further. Strong nonfarm payrolls have tightened the door on rate cuts, and the valuation recovery of tech stocks cannot go far without macro liquidity support. $BTC $ETH $SNDK 🚨 The calmer the $BTC rebound, the more cautious I am about going long! The $72,000 target remains unchanged for now! After last night's news, the market reaction was even calmer than I expected. BTC dipped to around $74,800 before bouncing back. This level is quite special, coinciding with an important retracement low from the previous rally in September. Looking at $ETH, it dipped to $2,207 at the lowest, without even breaking the previous low of $2,170. On the surface, the bulls seem to be showing decent support. But I have another layer of concern. 1️⃣ After the sharp drop, bottom-fishing funds are starting to concentrate their entry. From BTC dropping from $88,000 to around $75,000, and ETH from $2,880 to near $2,200, many investors already feel the prices are cheap enough. Whether it's spot buying or bottom-fishing in the futures market, some support may form around this area. But the problem is: concentrated short-term buying does not mean the market has completed its bottom formation. 2️⃣ Why do I still look at $72,000? My judgment is that the market may still lack sustained upward momentum in the next one or two months. If a large amount of funds concentrate on bottom-fishing around $75,000–$76,000, then once that support breaks, some leveraged positions may be forced to exit, and the market could see another round of concentrated selling. Of course, this is just my view on the market structureAMD surged about 11.04% on Friday to close at $449.04, partially recovering from the roughly 17.26% drop on Thursday that was initially caught by buyers halfway. Thursday closed at 404.40, down about 17.26%; Friday opened near 444, peaked at 459.80, and closed at 449.04, a single-day gain of $44.64. On the same day, the Nasdaq rose about 1.09%, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index about 4.2%, with Nvidia and Intel also rebounding somewhat, but AMD was the main focus. During the sell-off, the market was mainly worried that the Democratic Party might tighten AI and data center regulations after the midterm elections, causing chip stocks to be collectively hit. The buying on Friday also repriced the very strong earnings report from November 4. Revenue was about $13.4 billion, up roughly 45% year-over-year, with data center revenue up about 97%. Analysts still project about 50% growth for the full year and about 79% growth by 2027. Valuation is not cheap, with a price-to-earnings ratio around 98 times, which is expensive. In the short term, I am bullish on AMD's oversold rebound; the solid earnings numbers remain, and the buying momentum is more favorable on this side.Weekend review of last week's sharp rebound after the plunge, don't be fooled by appearances. On Friday, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index appeared to lead gains, rising more than four points, looking quite strong; but if you look at the breadth: the Dow actually closed down that day, and the VIX remained above 25 without dropping. The only leaders were a small group of chip stocks, most sectors didn't follow, this is called a low-volume rebound, not a trend reversal. The semiconductor positions I hold at the bottom have recovered some losses on paper, but I haven't moved a single share or added any. The reason is simple: the market is pricing in nearly an 80% chance of a rate hike in December. In such an environment, rebounds are borrowed gains, not yours; when the time comes to pay back, you still have to pay. With the rebound narrowing to this extent, patience is more valuable than itchy hands. Do you think this rebound has topped out?🚨 $SNDK Don't be scared off by short-term negative news! The AI restrictions are currently just proposals; the actual results have not been implemented yet. Recently, the volatility of $SNDK has attracted a lot of attention, especially with news about the US restricting AI-related policies, which has affected market sentiment to some extent. But one thing needs to be clear: a proposal is not the same as formal approval, and it certainly does not mean that related businesses have been substantively restricted. My views mainly include three points: 1️⃣ Policy uncertainty remains The related restrictions currently discussed in the market still require attention to subsequent legislative and regulatory developments. Before formal implementation, it is not appropriate to treat the worst-case scenario as fact. 2️⃣ AI storage demand is still worth watching With the continuous development of AI data centers, the demand for NAND flash, high-performance storage, and enterprise-grade SSDs remains a key market focus. The long-term performance of $SNDK ultimately depends on actual orders, earnings, and industry demand. 3️⃣ No rush to bottom-fish; wait for trend reconfirmation I won’t rush in just because the price has dropped, nor will I turn completely bearish based solely on one policy announcement. Rather than guessing the lowest point, I prefer to wait for signs of price stabilization and renewed volume strength before considering phased entry. To summarize: I still maintain a certain medium- to long-term interest in $SNDK. Short-term policy news may continue to affect market sentiment, but if the fundamentals have not materially deteriorated, there is still potential for revaluation later. No need to rush to chase, nor to because #RocketLabQ3Neutron My take on $RKLB ahead of Q3 (Nov 9): revenue likely lands in the $250–265M guide, but GAAP EPS looks tight around -$0.07 to -$0.08. The real story: Neutron (pushed to 2027) and the Iridium deal. The stock will likely move on guidance, not the print. Not financial advice.#Pratinjau Laporan Keuangan RocketLab: Bagaimana Kemajuan Roket Neutron? $NKE Damn it! NKE's trend makes me shake my head. Purely technical movement like this, with no fundamental support, just a hard dump—clearly a manipulative washout by the big players. The daily level 38.6 resistance is tightly pressing down, volume is shrinking like squeezing toothpaste, exactly the same pattern as the fake breakout in August. Take my advice, short around 38.627, stop loss at 39.2, keep position at 20%, don't be greedy. This kind of low-volume slow decline is like a dull knife cutting flesh; smart money is moving down, so let's not fight the trend. Don't chase highs or bottom-fish, wait for it to drop to the right level before buying back 🧘‍♂️ If you want to follow the trade, check the detailed orders in the market card below 📉 The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Contract leverage carries extremely high risk, please control your position size yourself, profits and losses are your own responsibility. 👇👇👇Position Daily Report: BTC Bottoming, ETH Under Pressure, SOL Avoiding the Spotlight Today's position summary in one sentence: BTC is grinding in place, ETH faces heavy pressure, SOL is tangled in trouble. · $BTC | Hovering around 75800: No clear direction, no panic, still consolidating sideways. Keep an eye on it mid-term, avoid chasing highs short-term. · $ETH | Concentrated pressure: Spot ETFs are plummeting, BlackRock leads the sell-off, Fidelity shifts 27,000 ETH; Binance chain USDT shrinks while leverage soars. More strikingly, a whale closed longs for a 17.78 million profit then flipped to short 30,000 ETH, bears are strong. ETH is mainly on defense. · $SOL | Significant trouble: sSea promotion halted by central bank investigation, Pump.fun frantically withdrawing tokens, co-founder Toly criticizes the foundation, Labs pushes Leap causing public outrage. Internal ecosystem conflicts combined with regulatory crackdown, avoid the spotlight short-term. Strategy: Focus mid-term on BTC, ETH and SOL mainly defensive. Against the backdrop of US October non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations and rising bets on December rate hikes, don’t mistake the rebound for a reversal; manage your positions first. #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 Red market, but the contract isn't more expensive MEGA spot at $0.05125, perpetual at $0.05114, Orbit is talking about a breakout, but I'm more concerned that the two quotes haven't aligned yet. Don't rush to make up stories. The price difference can't directly prove who's shorting; I'll keep these two order books for now. $MEGA #美国10月非农超预期，12月加息押注升温 ##AI巨头债券利差飙升：投资风险还是抄底良机 The more it falls, the more you buy; what you're really buying isn't cheapness, but pushing yourself into a corner. Have you noticed that some orders pile up thicker and thicker, yet the price becomes lighter and lighter? Last night, I checked the order books of SNDK and MU, and the feeling was very subtle—the buy orders densely stacked upward during the downtrend, while the sell orders were thin, like catching a knife that hasn't fallen yet. This isn't bottom fishing; it's the position deciding for someone. First, look at the facts: these two stocks have weakened continuously, but the buy order volume is several times that of the sell orders. Every time the price steps down, more people add positions, repeatedly lowering the cost basis, and the stop-loss levels keep dropping. It sounds like discipline, but it's actually giving up the retreat bit by bit. What is the market trading? Not value, but "I don't want to admit it." When one side keeps taking the goods and the other keeps selling, the price can only slide in the direction of least resistance. More importantly, the unrealized losses after adding positions don't grow linearly; every further drop multiplies the losses—the heavier the position, the thinner the margin for error. From the trend perspective, this looks more like a divergence in a downtrend continuation, not a start or a healthy continuation. In a real start phase, volume and price cooperate; here, the more the buy orders pile up, the lower the price goes—a typical aftermath of distribution. Bulls think they're diluting their cost, but they're actually handing chips to the bears. Looking at the bigger picture: after tech earnings, the Nasdaq weekly chart still fell about 3.4%, and risk appetite hasn't truly recovered. In this one-sided decline, BTC and ETH's correlation leans more toward sentiment—not active capital inflow, but passive technical rebounds after falling. Altcoins are even more sensitive, aOn the surface, it looks like Musk is finally putting the brakes on the Cybertruck, but what's really loosening underneath is something else. Guess what the market is panicking about? Tesla is reallocating the Texas factory's capacity to Cybercab and plans to gradually discontinue the Cybertruck by mid-2027. This news sounds like a straightforward stop-loss. After all, the original plan was to sell 250,000 units annually, but in 2025, only about 20,000 were actually sold in the U.S., and the gap is obvious. Yet, the stock price first dropped 10.77%, then bounced back 4.2% the next day, closing near $358. This back-and-forth itself shows that people aren't voting on the vehicle model but repricing the narrative.✨ What I'm watching isn't the car, but the emotional temperature within the derivatives structure. The Q3 earnings report showed revenue of about $28 billion, but operating profit dropped 56% year-over-year. The profit pressure on the automotive business is out in the open, and autonomous driving still requires continuous investment. So, the market's pricing of Tesla increasingly resembles trading a forward-looking story rather than current cash flow. In this state, the options market tends to see bets on both sides: some buying calls to chase the narrative, others buying protection against data disappointments. Implied volatility is being pulled back and forth, with FOMO and hesitation sitting at the same table. The bullish path is clear: cut slow-selling models and shift resources to Cybercab, which is an early admission of mistakes and a pivot. If subsequent urban operation data comes in steadily, risk appetite will return, and high-beta assets like BTC and ETH are likely to follow the tech narrative sentiment for a while. The altcoin side is even more sensitive, as long as the autonomous driving topic... $IMX Gaming adoption requires more than blockchain integration. Players care about gameplay, ownership, accessibility, and entertainment before they care about the underlying technology. Immutable focuses on blockchain infrastructure for gaming, including digital asset ownership and game development tools. Its biggest challenge is helping games attract genuine audiences rather than relying primarily on token incentives and speculative interest.BTC and ETH stuck in a volatile squeeze: chips are lightened, but bulls are still holding on hard $BTC is repeatedly tugging between $75,000 and $78,000, while $ETH is consolidating narrowly around $2,200–$2,300. In October, both fell by 7.3% and 16.0% respectively, with market breadth sharply contracting. Price is just the surface; the core issue lies in the capital structure: · Capital is withdrawing: Both BTC and ETH spot ETFs saw net outflows, with ETH alone experiencing a $1.6 billion monthly outflow, indicating institutional demand is shifting to tactical contraction. · Leverage is reduced, but sentiment remains firm: Open interest across the market dropped to a 12-month low, leverage has basically cleared out, yet perpetual funding rates remain positive—chips have been washed out, but bulls unwilling to concede are still paying to hold on. · The path likely dips before diverging: 10x Research believes BTC could still reach $90,000 by year-end, but only after first dropping to $77,000–$79,000 to complete the final shakeout; ETH is likely weaker than BTC due to value continuously flowing to Layer 2, resulting in insufficient returns for holders. The key signal for a trend reversal is when funding rates turn negative, which would truly mean bulls have conceded and a bottom structure is established. Before that, rebounds are more likely repairs rather than reversals. Coupled with the US October non-farm payrolls exceeding expectations and rising bets on December rate hikes, short-term sentiment remains suppressed—fasten your seatbelt.#SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can the Q2 Earnings Report Deliver Impressive Results? ​ Positive Highlights (Likely to Create "Impressive Paper Gains") - OpenAI's valuation remains stable or is adjusted upward → resulting in substantial unrealized investment gains, boosting the group's net profit and net asset value (NAV) significantly; ​ - Arm's resilient performance and stable dividends serve as SoftBank's cash flow ballast, offsetting the high-risk AI investments; ​ - The Japanese joint venture SB OAI Japan is deploying OpenAI services for enterprises, opening local B2B commercialization opportunities, representing a new growth point in SoftBank's own operations. Key Risks (Market's Main Concerns and Earnings Report Deductions) - OpenAI is still burning huge amounts of cash, with revenue growth but even higher computing costs, sustaining large operating losses, no stable cash returns, and equity that cannot be liquidated at will—entirely paper wealth; ​ - SoftBank has pledged OpenAI equity to secure margin loans in the tens of billions, with additional collateral clauses; any downward adjustment in OpenAI's valuation would directly impact SoftBank's net worth and trigger debt risks. CDS spreads in the bond market have widened, and rating agencies are worried about exposure risks; ​ - Intensifying competition: Anthropic, Google, and others continue to catch up, with large model price wars squeezing gross margins; meanwhile, OpenAI's complex governance structure and uncertain IPO timing mean the exit window is far off; ​ - Funding pressure: substantial future investment payments still need to be made in batches, continuously draining SoftBank's cash and increasing capital expenditure pressure #软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ Core Risks (Most Market Concerns and Deduction Points in the Financial Report) - OpenAI is still burning huge amounts of cash, revenue is growing but computing power costs are even higher, resulting in sustained large operating losses, no stable cash returns, equity cannot be liquidated at any time, all just paper wealth; - SoftBank has pledged OpenAI equity to obtain a hundred-billion-level margin loan, with additional collateral clauses; if OpenAI's valuation is downgraded, it will directly impact SoftBank's net worth and trigger debt risks, CDS in the bond market has already widened, rating agencies are worried about exposure risks; - Intensified competition: Anthropic, Google, and others continue to catch up, large model price wars squeeze gross margins; meanwhile, OpenAI's governance structure is complex, IPO timing is uncertain, exit window is far off; - Funding pressure: there are still large amounts of investment funds to be delivered in batches, continuously consuming SoftBank's cash, with high capital expenditure pressure. . Financial Report Outlook - Book profit: may look very good, provided OpenAI's current valuation remains unchanged or is raised; but profit quality is weak, it is fair value change gains, not main business cash flow; - Conditions for exceeding expectations: Arm's profit exceeds expectations, management provides a clear OpenAI exit timetable, Stargate project progress is clear; - Triggers for underperformance: OpenAI valuation downgrade, management admits expanded additional investment scale, leverage/liquidity guidance turns conservative Don't get excited yet: On November 5th, the U.S. Department of Labor sent the final rule "allowing 401(k) retirement plans to buy crypto assets" to the White House for final review. This is not a positive event being realized, but the start of the pipeline. ① How big is the pool? ICI data: U.S. 401(k) assets total $10.8 trillion, total U.S. retirement assets $51.2 trillion (Q2 2026). ② How slow is the pipeline? Experts estimate: White House final review takes up to 90 days, then about 60 days after publication to take effect, so a few options may appear in 2027, and widespread adoption in 2028; ETFs and funds will come first, not direct coin holdings. ③ Who can get in? The DOL's March proposal set six criteria: performance, fees, liquidity, valuation, benchmark, complexity. Lawyers put it bluntly: $BTC clearly passes, $ETH passes, others fail on performance records or benchmarks. The key question is "can you get a reliable daily quote from a regulated wrapper?" So for small coins, this is a pseudo-positive — money will concentrate on the two or three assets with the best liquidity. Reality check: In the same week, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $1.28 billion, the worst since June, turning negative for the first time in 2026; $BTC current price $75,800, down from $81,199 this week. $ETH spot ETFs had a net outflow of $193 million over two days. Policy is a slow variable, not a buy signal. This $10.8 trillion, do you see it as incremental buying power or just sentiment? #BTC现货ETF年内累计净流出约4.16亿美元 The US Bitcoin spot ETF has seen a cumulative net outflow of about $416 million this year, but this is a slight net negative after offsetting inflows and outflows, and should not be simply interpreted as a full institutional withdrawal. According to Farside data as of November 5, the total net inflow days this year amount to about $25.63 billion, while total net outflow days amount to about $26.05 billion, with a gap of only $416 million. The marginal direction is more concerning: on November 6 alone, there was a $412 million outflow; over the past five trading days, the total outflow was about $1.282 billion; the cumulative net outflow in November is about $1.28 billion, with only one trading day of net inflow so far this month. The recent outflow speed and concentration clearly deviate from the annual average. After a hotter-than-expected October nonfarm payroll, the December rate hike bet rose to about 80%, and US Treasury real yields increased, suppressing high-risk assets with zero cash flow; after the midterm elections, expectations for crypto-friendly policies cooled, prompting some funds to reduce exposure. Institutional differentiation is obvious: BlackRock's IBIT is the main source of recent outflows, with a net outflow of $1.209 billion in a single week in November, and about $403 million redeemed on November 6 alone; Fidelity's FBTC saw a counter-trend inflow of about $42.8 million, but it was insufficient to offset outflows. Price and funds form a negative feedback loop: Bitcoin fell below $75,000, ETF redemptions added extra selling pressure, and over $1.27 billion in crypto derivatives positions were liquidated simultaneously, with longs accounting for over $1.1 billion. The turning signal should be whether the ETF can return to sustained net inflows. $BTC L3 and AppChains once excited developers, claiming to give each application its own dedicated lane. But the reality is: the cars are built, but there are no cars on the road, and the funds are all fragmented into pieces. Comparing these three projects: $DYDX: The pioneer migrating from L2 to Cosmos AppChain. It gained highly customized performance at the cost of losing aggregated liquidity from the Ethereum mainnet. Due to a lack of deep market makers, trading volume has been heavily eroded by competitors like Hyperliquid, and the 75% buyback mechanism is useless due to revenue exhaustion. $ZORA: An L2/L3 focused on the creator economy. It attracted many NFT and content creators, but on-chain assets are highly homogeneous. Lacking real DeFi lending depth, relying solely on internal PVP trading cannot accumulate large external funds, making protocol revenue extremely unstable. $ARB: The king of L2. Why is it successful? Because it has a "liquidity network effect." Although its Orbit L3 chains are continuously launched, the underlying assets and settlements remain anchored on the Arbitrum mainnet, allowing funds to form a closed loop. Conclusion: DYDX is "highly customized but liquidity exhausted"; ZORA is "locally prosperous but hard to accumulate large funds"; ARB is "underlying aggregation with strong network effects." The biggest trap of L3 is using technical "sovereignty" to exchange for liquidity "islands." #Anthropic still plans November IPO, investors lower valuation expectations Anthropic's plan for a November IPO has not been withdrawn, but control over valuation has clearly shifted to investors. At the beginning of October, the market once valued it at about $2 trillion, dropping to $1.4 trillion to $1.5 trillion by mid-October. After this week's tech stock sell-off, potential investors have further lowered the discussion range to $1.2 trillion to $1.3 trillion, with some even seeing around $1 trillion. The company originally planned to start roadshows the week of November 9 and price the IPO the following week, but the probability of completing the IPO before November 30 on Kalshi has dropped from 84% to 60%. The valuation downgrade is driven by both macro and company-specific factors: the Nasdaq 100 plunged 6.4% in a single day, AI assets were heavily sold off, and market concerns about data center prospects and the return on massive AI expenditures have intensified; the prospectus shows revenue of $16.286 billion in the first half of 2026, GAAP net loss of $80.748 billion mainly due to non-cash items such as fair value changes of convertible notes caused by valuation increases, operating loss narrowed to $693 million, with a single quarter of operating profit in Q2, but a fixed cost pressure from a more than $430 billion compute procurement commitment over the next decade. Insiders say that if AI assets continue to be under pressure, the company may delay the issuance; Morningstar believes accepting a slightly lower pricing to complete the listing may be more pragmatic. Essentially, the IPO window is still open, but its width is not determined solely by Anthropic. #马斯克预计SpaceX年底年化营收突破1000亿美元 $xSPCX Q4 revenue is expected to grow about 70% quarter-over-quarter to nearly $25 billion, achieving an annualized revenue exceeding $100 billion by December, with the statement "Unless a natural disaster occurs, we will reach that goal." He also set the 2027 year-end annualized revenue target at over $500 billion, considering $1 trillion "not impossible" with about a 2% probability. After the announcement, SpaceX's stock closed up 8.62% on Friday at $134.27, still below the $135 IPO price in June. The source of growth has undergone a structural shift. Q3 revenue was $14.58 billion, up 161% year-over-year, equivalent to an annualized approximately $58 billion; among this, AI business revenue was $7.56 billion, soaring 830% year-over-year, accounting for 52% of total revenue, surpassing Starlink's 36% and launch business's 12% for the first time. Government contracts' share dropped from about 20% in 2025 to 16.6% in Q3, with Musk expecting it to fall below 10% this quarter. In other words, the $100 billion annualized revenue is a short-term verifiable milestone, while the $500 billion essentially remains a management vision rather than a market pricing benchmark. The focus going forward should not be on the target number itself, but whether Q4 actual revenue can reach near $25 billion, and whether the renewal pace of AI computing power contracts can support the current growth rate.The non-farm impact has been fully digested, and the crypto market has entered a phase of low-volume tug-of-war. The US added 165,000 non-farm jobs in October, significantly exceeding market expectations. The unemployment rate fell simultaneously, and wage growth picked up, indicating that the labor market remains resilient. After the data release, interest rate expectations were quickly revised, the dollar and US Treasury yields strengthened, and the crypto market first experienced a round of leverage liquidation. Long positions were concentratedly cleared in the short term, and macro negative factors followed. Currently, sentiment has clearly cooled, mainstream coins' volatility has narrowed, and bullish and bearish forces are temporarily balanced, waiting for new directional signals. BTC is quoted at 75,922, with limited intraday amplitude, roughly trading between 74,800 and 76,400 over 24 hours. Resistance is at 76,172, support at 75,496, Bollinger Bands continue to contract, and volatility is suppressed. ETH is currently around 2,241, repeatedly tugging around the middle band, with support at 2,221 and resistance at 2,244, showing no strong short-term trend. OKB is moving sideways with the broader market, currently priced at 105.5, above the short-term moving average, ranging between 103.26 and 107.36, performing relatively steadily. The impact of macro news has temporarily paused, and the market has entered a news vacuum period. Lacking incremental funds to drive it, the market is more likely to clean leverage through upper and lower spikes, forming a grinding consolidation. In the short term, it is advisable to watch more and trade less, patiently waiting for an effective breakout before following.Apollo is spending $75 billion on AI chips — the AI buildout is now private-equity scale. 🟠 BTC at $75,845, holding $75,000. Support: $75,000. Resistance: $76,371, then $79,000. Chips are the new oil — and the AI trade keeps pulling risk assets along. My take: AI infra is the macro tide; BTC holds $75K until CPI tells it where to go. Is AI spend the next bubble, or the next backbone? 👇 #Bitcoin #BTC #AI #TechStocks #OKXOrbit#SoftBank's Heavy Bet on OpenAI: Can Q2 Earnings Deliver Impressive Results? SoftBank has invested approximately $64.6 billion in OpenAI, holding about 13% equity, making it one of the largest single bets currently. This year, it completed three additional investments totaling $30 billion, with the final $10 billion tranche settled on October 1, partially funded by high-yield bonds with coupons close to 9.75%—this is not a small gamble but a bet with the balance sheet at stake. The Q2 earnings report will be released on November 10. The market's main focus is not on traditional business but on how the fair value of OpenAI's equity is recognized, whether the LTV (loan-to-value ratio) remains controllable, and the structure of cash and debt. Previous quarters saw huge investment gains due to OpenAI's valuation surge, but recently the AI sector has cooled, OpenAI's financing targets have been lowered, and its valuation has retreated from higher expectations to around $1.25 trillion. Can the paper gains continue? Masayoshi Son's style has always been "all in on the future." From Yahoo, Alibaba, to Arm, and now the full chain of OpenAI + computing power + robotics, he is betting on dominance in the AGI era. But this time the leverage is higher, the term longer, and the exit path more uncertain—OpenAI is not yet public, and data center and power investments have long cycles. Under high-interest financing, if valuations stagnate or decline, interest and market value fluctuations will squeeze simultaneously. If Q2 delivers impressive results (continued upward revision of OpenAI's fair value, strong contribution from Arm), it could temporarily ease credit concerns. $OPENAI #OKXTraderVoices If you are starting your journey in the world of cryptocurrencies today, remember this rule: never invest money you cannot afford to lose.$BTC It sounds simple, but emotions drive people to break this rule every day. When the market moves fast, panic takes over. The best way to endure and succeed in the crypto world is to build your investment portfolio gradually. Start by looking at established assets with high liquidity, instead of randomly chasing trending tokens. Tell me in the comments: what is your number one rule for risk management Bitcoin core developer Cory Fields has proposed a novel mechanism to deter quantum computer attacks on Bitcoin: the "Quantum Mine" scheme. This scheme requires attackers attempting to steal Bitcoin using quantum computers in the future to first stake an equivalent amount of Bitcoin as collateral. The original holder can pre-set a hidden proof of ownership and use this proof to reclaim their Bitcoin and confiscate the thief's collateral within a fund lock-up period (e.g., 30 days). Before paying funds, attackers cannot know which holdings have "mines" planted. This scheme only applies to owners who still hold the private keys and does not apply to lost Bitcoins. For inactive wallets, Fields also envisions an auction system: competitors can pre-stake hidden bids on vulnerable wallets, and if attacked by a quantum thief, the highest bidder's smart contract will automatically trigger, destroying the thief's target coins, confiscating their collateral, and awarding the bounty to the highest bidder. Industry Analysis and Impact This proposal highlights the cryptocurrency industry's growing concern over the long-term security of Bitcoin's elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA). Although practical quantum attacks may still take years or even decades to materialize, the theoretical risk has prompted researchers to explore proactive defense measures. Fields' scheme is quite clever from a game theory perspective: by making theft economically suicidal, it aims to kill attacks before they happen. However, the proposal also faces complex implementation challenges. It will likely require modifying the Bitcoin protocol through a soft fork or hard fork, and the hidden proof of ownership🚨 BREAKING: Bitcoin open interest has reached the exact levels where MAJOR SHORT SQUEEZES have historically occurred. The last 3 times this happened, $BTC saw massive pumps. #USJobsBeatExpectations #软银重金押注OpenAI，Q2财报能否交出亮眼成绩？ SoftBank Group will release its FY2026 Q2 financial report on November 10, with the market focusing on the financial results of its AI sector bets. Through Vision Fund II, SoftBank has completed an additional $30 billion investment in OpenAI's third round, with a total cumulative investment of $64.6 billion, corresponding to about a 13% stake, making it one of OpenAI's most important investors. The core highlights of this financial report focus on the Vision Fund's investment gains and losses, changes in the fair value of underlying assets, and the group's financing pressure. To complete this huge capital outlay, SoftBank arranged financing tools such as foreign currency senior notes, and the large capital investment will be directly reflected in liabilities and cash flow data. Fluctuations in OpenAI's valuation will directly affect the Vision Fund's book gains or impairments, impacting SoftBank's overall net asset performance. The high volatility of AI investments is the biggest variable. If OpenAI's valuation continues to rise, it will continuously increase SoftBank's investment income; if the AI sector valuation corrects, the huge holdings may bring asset impairment risks. The market will use this financial report to judge the sustainability of SoftBank's continued AI funding and the ability of Masayoshi Son's AI investment strategy to deliver. $BTC $ETH $SNDK A rebound to 82,000 does not mean the market has reversed; what really matters is whether it can hold at that level. @张教主。 This judgment on $BTC is not blindly bullish, but rather to first acquire spot positions, then wait for the price to reach a critical point before distinguishing whether this is just a rebound or the start of a stronger trend. He repeatedly reminds: even if the direction is correct, contract positions may not survive until the payoff day. Separate the weekend sideways movement from the subsequent trend. Facing doubts about the rebound's weakness, he does not define a day's fluctuation as a failure but places the next confirmation on Monday: whether the current minor high can break through, and if it can hold after breaking through, then continue upward. Only with such strong performance will he raise expectations for the subsequent market. Until it breaks out, hope cannot replace confirmation. On a smaller scale, he keeps a scenario that makes contract bulls uncomfortable: the price may first drop to sweep liquidity again, then recover and continue to oscillate within the range. The previous false breakdown does not guarantee it won't happen again. For spot holders, this may just be volatility during holding; for those with stop losses near the lows and heavy positions, the same movement might first clear them out before continuing in the originally anticipated direction. When he mentions the stop loss near 74,300, the focus is not on deciding whether viewers should move it, but to remind that level may be swept again. This is not a reason to cancel stop losses, nor to bear losses indefinitely. On the contrary, the issue is whether this possibility was factored into the risk before opening the position.The market's last bullish hope did not survive the payrolls print. US jobs data came in far above expectations, reviving the case for tighter policy, and the dollar and Treasury yields rose together. $BTC could not even defend its psychological levels, sliding to 74,877 before stabilising near 75,700. That is the tell. Good macro data should have been a relief; instead it hardened rate expectations and squeezed the most rate-sensitive assets. Crypto is trading as a liquidity barometer, not a gro
Orbit Topic Sitemap