Orbit Post Sitemap
Core contradiction: $80,000 stuck between "two cost lines"
Glassnode's data reveals the most essential current price situation — Bitcoin is caught between two key cost lines, with selling pressure to break even above and real support below:
Above: $81,500 — the "break-even line" for ETF holders
The weighted average holding cost of spot Bitcoin ETFs across the U.S. is approximately in the $80,000-$82,000 range, the most direct and persistent source of selling pressure.
Below: $79,000 — a "thicker" structural support
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 After comparing Microsoft and Google, I can only say: "No comparison, no hurt!"
Yesterday, when Google's earnings report came out, it wiped out over 50 billion USD, with cash flow turning negative. I originally thought AI was just a bottomless pit.
But tonight, Microsoft came out, and Azure cloud growth directly hit 48%!
Capital expenditure was 45.2 billion, still a huge amount, but less than market expectations.
What does this mean? It means the infrastructure they built earlier is starting to pay off.
Previously, with Bitcoin falling and US tech stocks dropping, everyone was afraid the "AI narrative" would collapse. Tonight, Microsoft's report basically gave the tech giants a strong lifeline.
Google fell after hours yesterday, while Microsoft rose 4% after hours today.
This is reality: capital doesn't care how good your story sounds; whoever can turn AI into real money is the boss.
#微软Q1营收增长，Azure增速至48%超预期 $ACU I'll be straightforward, the chart of this ACU really pisses me off. Damn it! The 0.1304 level is just a trap set by the manipulative whales to fish for buyers, purely a capital game with no fundamental backing at all. Who are they acting the fool for, exchanging insults? 🤡
The candlestick clearly shows a structure of a pump and dump, volume can't keep up, the upper shadows are getting longer and longer, a typical prelude to a shakeout. Don't chase longs, don't fantasize, at this level I'm only bearish.
Enter short around 0.1304, set stop loss above 0.1360, target first 0.1180, if broken then look down to 0.1050. Keep a close eye on the rhythm, don't be greedy.
If you want to follow, check the token market card below to see the order book, I've already set up an ambush. Whether you follow or not is your own risk. 👇👇👇The Federal Reserve held steady, but two members voted against, advocating for a rate hike. With this hawkish signal, BTC surged to 81,700 before dropping below 80,000, hitting a low of 79,607 USD. In the past 24 hours, liquidations reached 367 million, with long positions accounting for nearly 60%.
$BTC is around 80,100. Before the decision, ETFs saw net inflows for three consecutive days, with daily inflows exceeding 100 million on the 26th and 27th. Institutions completed their positioning on the left side. However, the hawkish dissenting votes made the "hold steady" stance no longer bullish. The 80,000 level was lost again, and the 81,000–82,000 range now requires repeated digestion.
$ETH is around 2,340. October spot ETF net outflows have reached about 1.35 billion USD, potentially marking the worst October since 2018. Meanwhile, wallets dormant for years transferred over 140 million USD worth of ETH to exchanges, so selling pressure is no longer coming solely from ETFs.
$SOL is around 100. ETFs had net outflows of 24.82 million over two days, with 19.16 million redeemed on the 27th—the largest single-day redemption since December last year. On-chain, a giant whale sold 1.02 million SOL over five days, about 104 million USD. The 100 USD level is the neckline of a head and shoulders pattern; daily close confirmed a break below, and 80 USD will come into view.
In short: the decision is out, but the hawkish signal remains. BTC’s ETF is on hold, ETH is pressured by both ETFs and awakening whales, and SOL’s 100 USD level is being repeatedly tested by outflows.
For record-keeping only, not investment advice.
#三星Q3营业利润创新高，净利润不及预期 The market has a new spectator sport: waiting for a large short seller to be liquidated. The disclosed book is $BTC short 2,613 coins opened at 76,343, $ETH short 106,400 coins, and $SOL short 719,900 coins, with paper losses above $20 million combined. The crowd reads that number as a countdown. It is closer to a receipt. Start with the arithmetic that undercuts the liquidation fantasy. All three positions are fully funded, with liquidation levels at 135,031 for Bitcoin, 3,671 for Ether and 293Everyone thought that staying put this time was a positive sign, but in reality, the market is truly repricing "how long high interest rates will last." Did you almost read "no rate hike" as "time to chase"? I also breathed a sigh of relief when I first saw the 3.75%–4.00% figure, but looking at the wording again, the hawkish tone is actually stronger than the decision itself. The price reaction is very honest: BTC first surged to 81.5K, then fell back to around 80K; ETH didn’t even have the strength to rally, staying around 2.3K. One tries to push up, the other can’t keep up—this isn’t a full risk-on, but more like hesitation after an emotional pulse. The key is that the market isn’t trading on "no rate hike this time," but on "rising divergence in December." No rate hike was priced in early, so it didn’t bring sustained buying; what really unsettles people is that the longer rates stay high, the harder it is for leverage and altcoin risk appetite to fully open. BTC’s relative resilience shows funds are still willing to stay in core assets; ETH’s weak momentum reminds me that narrative fatigue isn’t over, and sector rotation lacks follow-through. On the bullish side: no rate hike itself gave the market a breather, and BTC holding near 80K shows bulls haven’t surrendered control. On the bearish side: hawkish wording caps valuation upside, and FOMO can easily turn into a pullback after chasing, especially since altcoins are more sensitive to sentiment changes. What I’m more focused on now is whether there’s real support on the pullback, not how lively the rally is. Crowd psychology is currentlyAll 5 trades won, so they put up a "100% win rate" sign. I see this message as catering to the emotion of chasing winners, which is not the same as following the price trend. According to monitoring, this address is again using high leverage to go long on $ETH and currently has unrealized profits.
I have three principles for trading trends: look at the price structure, not who is famous; this long position cannot replace confirmation of the market; look at whether the evidence can be sustained—5 wins in a row is too small a sample to predict the next trade with confidence; look at risk, don’t treat unrealized profits as locked-in gains, as high leverage amplifies the impact of volatility on the position. I judge that such headlines will reinforce short-term bullish sentiment because people tend to treat others’ win rates as their own safety net.
The trend is the best friend; I will still wait for market confirmation and not chase the "always winning" story. Facing such large long positions, do you now use moving averages, volume, or high-low point structures to judge the trend? Will this change your criteria?Last night, the Federal Reserve pressed a hawkish pause button for the market. According to last night's content, the current interest rate remains unchanged, staying in the range of 3.75% to 4%. The voting result was 10 to 2, with two dissenting votes indicating a clear split within the committee. The wording in the statement is to wait for more information to accumulate before making the next decision. Wash also specifically emphasized at the press conference that politics did not influence this decision made by the institution he is "honored to lead." This sentence itself is actually a response to external doubts about rate cuts or hikes before the midterm elections. The market's interpretation of this result is very unified: hawkish. The key point is that after the pause, a rate hike in December is still on the table. This time it says the rate remains unchanged, but in fact, a December hike is implied. This is why, even though there was no rate hike, risk assets still fell. For crypto, the Fed's hawkish pause continues to put pressure on Bitcoin. The logic behind this is not hard to understand: the pause only delays the bullet; it does not put the gun away. As long as the December rate hike event remains, long-term interest rates cannot come down, and risk asset valuations have no room to rise. The market reaction also shows this: Bitcoin fell below 80,000 after the decision. CoinDesk data shows this wave wiped out $356 million in crypto longs. Our own liquidation data also confirms this: total liquidations in 24 hours reached $373.95 million, with 84,811 people exiting. Longs accounted for $219.31 million or 58.6%, shorts $154.64 million or 41.4%. The most noteworthy part here is the 12-hour segment, 12 hours$BTC perpetual buy engine is stuck.
Strategy's increased holdings this week directly hit zero, turning to pour money into repurchasing high-yield preferred shares.
Calculating the accounts, for every 1 dollar spent buying coins, 9.18 dollars must be spent to cover debt.
Even the most ironclad perpetual motion machine has to withdraw money to protect its financial bottom line, and common stock issuance has also stopped.
The largest incremental buy order on the market has been cut off directly, what do the bulls use to defend this position?
#BTC
$BTC
👇$137 million flowed into Bitcoin ETFs, but the coin price fell 1.6% in 24 hours
On October 28 Eastern Time, the US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net inflow of $137 million, totaling about $424 million over three consecutive days
The entire month of October also turned positive with a net inflow of about $111 million
However, of this $137 million, BlackRock's IBIT alone accounted for $136 million, or 99%
Among other products, Bitwise's BITB only saw an inflow of $1.3 million, with the rest at zero
On the same day, Ethereum ETFs had an outflow of $21.4 million, continuing for three days, with a cumulative outflow of about $1.35 billion in October
What’s more disheartening is that the Federal Reserve held steady in the early hours of October 29, keeping interest rates at 3.75% to 4.00%
Money returned, rates didn’t ease, and Bitcoin’s current price is about $80,100, still down about 1.6% in 24 hours
I think this round is a "one player carrying the flag, price not cooperating" situation, so I’m observing but not chasing
Invalidation point: other products besides IBIT also have net inflows for two consecutive days, or Bitcoin volume breaks back above $81,800
Do you think institutions are quietly accumulating, or is it just BlackRock holding the line?
$IBIT $BTC $ETH
#Bitcoin #ETF今晚聊聊美联储这位对象 昨晚议息 利率维持3.75%到4% 十票赞成两票反对 那两票还是想加息的 嘴上说暂停 心里在算要不要分手 市场听完先冲了一下 BTC摸到8.1万 然后老老实实回到8万附近 今日行情 BTC 约7.97万到8万美元 日内小跌1%左右 ETH 约2300美元 跌2%左右 比大哥跌得更惨 数据为10月29日当日快照 以实时为准 为什么跌 第一 利率没降 还有人想加息 9月CPI 3.7% 比8月还高 通胀这个前任又回来敲门了 市场对12月加息的定价已经不低 第二 美股盘后谷歌因为烧钱太猛被砸 纳指期货跟着弱 风险资产一起降温 第三 杠杆多头被清了一波 持仓量掉了7%左右 涨一点就追 跌一点就爆 老毛病 另外有巨鲸往Coinbase Prime转了近5亿美元BTC 转进去不等于卖 也可能是机构调仓 别自己吓自己 明日展望 8万是心理关口 守住就是震荡 跌破看7.8万附近 上方8.1万是压力 今晚还有通胀数据要看 数据一出 波动会放大 操作建议 别在12月会议前加太重的杠杆 手里有现金的人是最自由的 不追涨 不抄底硬接飞刀 想进场就分批 像谈恋爱一样 先吃几顿饭再谈结婚 Bitcoin $BTC is still the leader and very strong 🙀 Most traders still focus mainly on BTC and ETH.
Currently, BTC has returned to 80022, $ETH at 2322, and $SOL stuck at 100.27.
BTC's base resilience is the strongest; even with repeated fluctuations around the 80k mark, institutional holdings have not massively withdrawn. The 79000-80000 range has solid cost support, and funds are willing to repeatedly play here, making it the first choice for most people, with higher fault tolerance and easier recovery after dips.
ETH is different; the 2350 trendline has already been broken, funding rates are dropping rapidly, bullish leverage enthusiasm is fading, ETFs are continuously flowing out, and big players are choosing to reduce positions. Its pressure is clearly greater than BTC's. 2300 is the current critical defense line; if it fails, liquidation will be triggered.
SOL is currently the weakest among the three. Large whales keep depositing to exchanges, creating continuous selling pressure. The head and shoulders pattern is present, with 100 as the neckline. Once this breaks effectively, the downside target is directly 80, with volatility risk much greater than BTC and ETH.
There is good reason why most prefer BTC and ETH.
BTC is the emotional anchor of the entire crypto market. As long as the macro sentiment is dovish, BTC stabilizes first, giving ETH and SOL a chance to rebound; if the tone turns hawkish, SOL will be the first to falter, then ETH, while BTC is relatively more resilient.
Most traders choosing BTC and ETH essentially prioritize liquidity and survival.$ARB This situation is quite strange. The entire network is buzzing as its active addresses surge to 1.09 million, a 30-day high, making the on-chain activity as lively as a festival.
And the price? It dropped 2.6% today, down 9.6% over 7 days.
I really have to laugh. The number of addresses has reached the fullest in a month, yet the coin price is stuck at the 7-day low, and the volume is only 1.5 times the usual — it's not that no one is buying, but no one is in a hurry to buy. This is what we call lively activity, but the money stays put. Retail investors are busy interacting and increasing addresses, while the real chips are quietly being passed out.
On-chain data diverging from price has only two possible outcomes: either it's the bears' final act, or someone is using the hype to offload. $ARB Intel will release its Q3 earnings report after the market closes tomorrow. My personal judgment: the server business has a chance to deliver a slightly better-than-expected performance, but whether the company can continue to raise profit forecasts after the report depends on its delivery capacity in Q4 and how much profit the new revenue can retain. This company currently shows an interesting contrast. The PC market is still under pressure, yet market revenue expectations for Intel are rising. The CPU demand driven by AI is buying it time to repair its operations. Meanwhile, advanced process technology and new factories still require continuous spending, and capital expenditures are increasing. 1. Market expectations have already exceeded the midpoint of the company's guidance. Let's first look at the position of expectations. Intel's revenue guidance for Q3 is $15.8 billion to $16.8 billion, with a midpoint of $16.3 billion; adjusted EPS is $0.38, and adjusted gross margin is 42%. The current public market expectation is roughly $16.4 billion to $16.5 billion, with adjusted EPS between $0.39 and $0.40. In other words, the market has already priced in results slightly above the company's guidance midpoint. Therefore, if the final report shows $16.5 billion in revenue and $0.40 EPS, the operational performance can be considered good, but in terms of earnings report trading, the surprise might be limited. I am more concerned about where the excess comes from. If server shipments accelerate and gross margin is better than expected, the market has reason to continue raising profit forecasts for the next few quarters. If revenue mainly comes from raising prices through product mix, with limited profit improvement, the basis for revaluation will be thinner. Q2 has already provided a strong reference. Intel's revenueAfter a day of no rate hike, Bitcoin actually fell all day
You must have seen the early morning news: the Federal Reserve did not raise rates, keeping them at 4%.
But if you look closely at this meeting, it seems calm on the surface, but it's all hawkish underneath. Out of 12 members, 2 directly voted against, thinking a hike was necessary this time; the statement changed economic growth from "solid" to "strong"; at the press conference, Waller bluntly said inflation is still far from 2% and there’s no room for concessions.
This is not a pause, it’s a "hawkish pause"—no action in October, but the knife is already set for December.
The market today is honest too. Bitcoin at 80,000, Ethereum at 2,320, no rebound all day, instead slowly grinding down, even lower than early morning. Those waiting to "buy the dip on no rate hike" probably had a tough day.
The logic isn’t complicated. The no rate hike was known by 90% of people two weeks ago, already priced in. The real new info is those 2 opposing votes and Waller’s tough talk, all pointing to a December hike.
Money is still stuck at a high 4% interest rate, no new money is coming in, all the good news is out, what do you have to push prices up?
I remain bearish, if Bitcoin can’t hold 80,000, look down to 76,000; Ethereum breaking 2,240 heads to 2,200. Don’t chase rebounds, keep cash on hand.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC has now reached the most critical stage, which is the midterm elections. Compared to the previous news, this will have a greater impact on the subsequent trend! Be patient and see how much the victories of the Democratic and Republican parties will affect the crypto space.
Starting with the winning probabilities: Based on current voting, the Democrats have an 80% chance of taking the House of Representatives,
and a 58% chance of taking the Senate. This is quite a blow to the Republicans; the blond guy is angry and might target Iran (haha, just kidding).
House of Representatives: Democrats currently have a clear advantage, and it will be difficult for Republicans to maintain control.
Senate: Democrats have a slight edge, but the competition is fiercer, so the result cannot be determined prematurely.
Probability of both chambers controlled by Democrats: about 56%.
According to these odds, the Democrats are very likely to win, which will put significant pressure on the crypto space.
CLARITY Act: May require increased conflict of interest disclosures, consumer protections, and decentralized finance disclosures, potentially prolonging negotiations.
Crypto regulation: Congressional investigations and hearings may increase, with stricter scrutiny of relationships between crypto companies and government officials (possibly leading to a cliff-like drop).
Not only will the crypto market be under pressure, but this will also be a huge blow to the blond guy, which unexpectedly means that in next year's presidential election, Trump will lose a lot of support! Furthermore, it will subject Musk's Tesla, rockets, and other projects to scrutiny since he is Trump's biggest supporter! At that time, stock prices will face challenges, tech stocks will also be dragged down, and capital will shrink significantly. The consequences need no further explanation!$ZEC's recent move was pretty much what I expected! I mentioned earlier that this altcoin suddenly showed more strength than BTC and ETH, rebounding from 1119. At that time, I suspected the main driver was speculation on the NU7 upgrade! But I also warned that ZEC would eventually have to follow BTC's lead, and starting Wednesday, news came out, so be cautious of a spike followed by a pullback!
As a result, ZEC initially surged alone to around 1330, likely punishing many short sellers! Wednesday marked the 10th anniversary and coincided with the launch of institutional ETPs, followed by the Fed releasing a hawkish signal overnight. On one hand, there was positive news for ZEC itself; on the other, macro pressure. Ultimately, ZEC fell along with BTC and ETH, hitting a low near 1229 today, down nearly 5% in 24 hours! Why isn't it moving independently anymore?
I still suspect that the previous sharp rally partly served to shake out shorts, and once the news window passed, some profit-taking began. The NU7 upgrade is planned around November 5, and the privacy narrative and technical benefits remain! But my judgment on ZEC is that it is indeed weak in the short term! It is temporarily holding around 1230, but if it can't reclaim 1260–1270, why rush to call for further gains? Only a solid recovery would target 1300–1330. If it breaks below 1230 effectively and can't bounce back, then watch out for 1200!When I look at lending protocol updates, I usually flip to the borrower page first. Whether the liquidity pool is bustling is one thing; how much cost those remaining inside have to pay is another.
The story of SparkLend here starts with liquidity tightening earlier this week. Now the available $USDT in the pool is $11.95 million, with utilization still close to 96%; suppliers receive an APY of about 6.9%, while borrowers bear an APR of about 7.70%. The same pool, but the two sides get different bills.
I think this is more like a pressure signal from the borrowing side, rather than a profit celebration from the supply side. Borrowing costs will squeeze the earnings space of capital users; if new borrowing demand continues to come in but supply doesn't keep up, then available funds will remain under pressure. This is my speculation; high utilization alone cannot prove that growth can be sustained.
This story reminds me: fully utilized funds do not equal loose turnover. Do you think new supply will come in next, or will borrowing demand cool down first? The Federal Reserve held steady last night, and a key signal appeared in the BTC options market:
$BTC's positive Gamma exposure is concentrated around 82K, which will create short-term oscillation pressure.
1D IV rose to 48.7%, 25Δ RR dropped to -7%, indicating the market's pricing for short-term downside protection has clearly increased.
According to the original bull market trading strategy:
If 82K is reclaimed, consider the 82K/88K Call bull spread expiring at the end of November to track the next upward move.
If it falls below 80K, pause on going long. If this $UNITREE doesn't drop soon, I really won't be able to hold on today.
Looking at that scorching red 95.60 on the screen, and then seeing the -75.98% unrealized loss in my account, my chest aches in waves.
I opened a short at 76.28, and now it's been roasted alive for nearly 20 points.
Last night, when I saw it surge to 104, I was already mentally prepared for liquidation.
But why have I been gritting my teeth and still haven't hit the close position button?
Go check the 1-hour chart.
After surging to 104, it was all show and no strength, immediately softening.
Now it's stuck around 95, moving sideways, with EMA20, EMA30, and EMA60 pressing down hard—does this look strong?
This is "exhaustion after a high-level bull trap."
Today they even announced a "20 million investment into the Embodied Intelligence Base," but what happened?
The market can't even make a decent splash.
All the good news is just a cover for the main force to unload!
The astronomical hundreds-of-times P/E bubble of Yushu on the big A market has long been ready to burst.
Now in crypto, this price is propped up purely by sentiment; once funding dries up, the fall will be faster than anyone else.
I'm trapped like this now; cutting losses is impossible, I will never hand over chips at this position in my life.
But I have to warn my brothers: never chase shorts at this mid-level!
Even the dog whales have shaken me this badly; they could spike it up again anytime.
We have to wait, wait until it completely exhausts the last strength of the bulls.
As soon as it dares to break the short-term support at 94, that will be the real signal for us shorts to launch a counterattack.
I can't swallow this anger! Let's see how long it can rage, sitting tight for a high short dive!
$BTC
$ETH
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 The Federal Reserve no longer provides explicit forward guidance; all decisions depend on CPI, core inflation, non-farm payrolls, and wages; strong data → next rate hike; weak data → next rate cut; end of rate hikes is positive for crypto, takeoff takeoffRegarding Terafab, the easiest misunderstanding is to directly interpret "participating in the project" as having secured huge wafer foundry orders.
Intel is already involved, but the subsequent cooperation model is still worth breaking down: providing manufacturing processes, participating in technology development, or directly undertaking production in its own factories—all have different revenue structures.
At the same time, TSMC has also confirmed that it is discussing capacity cooperation related to Terafab, but no clear conclusions that can be announced have been reached yet.
Putting this information together, I think the most important question now is the division of labor. Who provides the technology, who operates the factories, and who is responsible for production yield and delivery? These will affect how much revenue Intel ultimately receives and how much investment it needs to bear.
I hope Intel's foundry transformation can make progress and acknowledge that a large project may bring opportunities in technology and customers. But the more attention a cooperation receives, the more it requires specific terms to support judgment.
If technology licensing is realized, it could also be a good business; directly undertaking manufacturing depends on capacity and profit. There is no need to choose the most profitable version for the company when details are missing.
Terafab is worth tracking. The next step that would make me willing to raise my judgment would be clearer cooperation scope and execution progress, rather than appearing once again in the same group photo.
#英特尔代工转型迎来Terafab新变量 CoinDCX suffers another $16 million loss: Old wallets become new risks, exchange security boundaries need reassessment. An abnormal transfer of approximately $16 million USDT has once again put the Indian cryptocurrency exchange CoinDCX under dual scrutiny for security and operational management. Unlike traditional attacks targeting active hot wallets, this incident involved decommissioned old wallet infrastructure and a malfunctioning automatic fund aggregation system. More notably, CoinDCX founder and CEO Sumit Gupta initially referred to the on-chain alert as a possible "false positive," before the platform officially acknowledged the loss. For cryptocurrency exchanges, this incident raises a more complex question than whether private keys were leaked: when old addresses can still receive user funds and internal systems fail to promptly transfer funds to secure environments, what does the so-called infrastructure decommissioning truly mean? Why can "decommissioned" wallets still receive funds? The CoinDCX incident exposes a structural blind spot in exchange operations. Wallets are often marked as deactivated in internal records, but the corresponding blockchain addresses remain valid and can still receive deposits. If user-end systems, deposit monitoring tools, and automatic aggregation processes are not fully synchronized with the decommissioning process, funds may remain stuck in addresses no longer actively monitored or protected. In this incident, the automatic fund aggregation system failed, causing incoming USDT to not be transferred timely to a secure environment, thus exposing it to risk. This is not an isolated technical failure but a governance issue.Galaxy believes the BTC bear market may have ended. Why are institutions turning at this point? First, the news. Key points: Galaxy publicly stated that the BTC bear market may have ended (cautiously worded). Market conditions at the same time: BTC at $80,948.4 (+0.49%, nearly one week -4.25%); ETF latest single-day net inflow of 111.5 million, 5-day net outflow of 28.7 million, 10-day net inflow of 308.2 million; Fear & Greed Index at 51; USD at 102.43, gold at 4,065.7, S&P 500 at 7,722.6. Next, looking at capital impact. Institutional turning points are usually based on three observations: first, the price has not broken key support (79,220 held); second, capital begins to flow back (10-day +308.2 million); third, macro environment improves (gold and US stocks rising simultaneously). All three now show preliminary signs, so the judgment that the bear market may have ended has appeared. Implications for BTC: Institutional views themselves do not immediately change prices, but they change capital expectations. As more institutions shift from bearish to neutral-to-bullish, allocation funds will gradually enter. This is exactly the script before the rebounds in June and September—first the viewpoint shifts, then capital inflows, and finally price breakthroughs. I will next watch four indicators: first, whether ETF inflows can continue; second, whether BTC can stand above 84,900; third, whether the US dollar index 102.43 will fall back; fourth, whether more institutions follow similar judgments. So the question is left to you: do you agree Since we've covered the earnings reports of Google and Microsoft, let's also preview Amazon's earnings report coming out early morning! Amazon's position among the three major cloud providers this week is very critical—double verification. Given that Google's earnings report had some flaws, Amazon's report becomes quite important. Whether it can boost confidence in cloud providers depends on Amazon! Amazon's earnings validation logic also looks at five key elements: revenue + AI capital expenditure + free cash flow + future guidance + AWS. The validation logic can be: AWS growth → AI CapEx → AWS profit margin → FCF → Q4/2027 guidance. Compared to Microsoft and Google, Amazon faces more direct pressure; the market wants to draw a conclusion from the earnings report—can AI investment quickly convert into cash flow? Revenue: >203B is excellent, 201-203B is acceptable and meets expectations, 199-201B is weak, <199B is clearly poor. However, revenue has a lower weight in tonight's earnings because the core AWS determines valuation. #AWS computing power demand is strong, what are the highlights of Amazon's Q3 earnings? AWS: the primary focus tonight. Q2 AWS revenue was 42.2B, up 37% year-over-year, with AWS operating profit reaching 16.6B. This means AWS is the core of Amazon's AI growth story and profit story. The mainstream expectation is 45.4B, corresponding to about 40% year-over-year growth, so AWS growth rate reaching 40% is key. >40% is excellent, 41% greatly exceeds expectations, 37%-40%Ethereum ETFs are approaching an unpleasant historical record: a net outflow of about $1.32 billion since October, just about $100 million short of the $1.42 billion record set in November 2025, with only a few trading days left. Meanwhile, Bitcoin ETFs have quietly been attracting funds, with a net inflow of $137.3 million just yesterday, of which IBIT contributed $136 million.
1. What has changed?
Funds are choosing BTC over ETH. ETH ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, with ETHA alone seeing a single-day outflow of $44.8 million; Bitcoin ETFs have accumulated about $424 million in inflows over the past three trading days.
2. Why is this worth attention?
BlackRock is simultaneously using IBIT to capture BTC buying demand while transferring nearly $200 million in ETH to Coinbase within two days. The same issuer is making completely different moves on these two major assets. This is not retail sentiment; it is institutional money making a choice.
3. Which market observation is currently more supported?
It supports the view that ETH is temporarily weaker than BTC at the institutional allocation level, rather than a full bearish outlook. Whether the tokens transferred on-chain to exchanges are actually being sold as real selling pressure, and whether the October outflow record will ultimately be broken, are the key confirmation signals to watch in the next two days.
If the record is indeed broken in the last three days, the story will become hard to ignore. Feel free to discuss in the comments whether you think ETH is being unfairly punished or if this is justified. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC $ETH 📌25x ETH Short Position Breakdown: The stop loss looks set on the order, but the threshold had already triggered liquidation early $ETH
▪️Position: Short 9,700 ETH, valued at 22.46M USDT, average entry price 2311.92 USDT, current unrealized loss 48,000 USD
▪️Orders: Take profit at 2058.2 (down 11%), stop loss set at 2750.1 (up 19%)
▪️Key risk: 25x leverage, if ETH rebounds 4% to around 2400, the position is immediately liquidated, rendering the stop loss order ineffective
💡Opinion: The risk-reward structure is distorted, representing an extreme bet on a one-sided downtrend. This stop loss is merely a placeholder order without real protective effect; such aggressive trading is not suitable for typical traders to follow.
⚠️Market information only, not investment advice$CL crude oil rose early in the morning, but the news only came in the afternoon. Who is positioning ahead of time?
The market pulled up in the early session, and the news broke in the afternoon—a typical case of major players laying the groundwork early and cashing in on the news. Currently, open interest continues to decline, indicating that bulls are taking profits and exiting, not bears dumping positions.
However, the news itself is a double-edged sword: expectations of military action provide a floor, while diplomatic negotiations exert pressure, making it difficult for the market to move smoothly up or down.
It is currently hovering around 101.7, with 99 as the last line of defense. Only above 102.23 will bulls signal a renewed push.
Before the news settles, volatility will only increase. Keep a close eye on key levels and don’t get carried away by emotions.
#霍尔木兹重开方案浮现，油价回落能否持续？ Who exactly profits from crypto trading? The people who make money and those who "trade crypto" are often not the same group.
On the retail side, about 70% of trading addresses incur losses, while 0.0385% of top addresses take over 70% of the profits; among frequent traders, over 60% lose money, and out of a sample of 450,000, only 254 made more than $10,000.
So who is taking the money? Exchanges and market makers first take fees, profiting regardless of market conditions; insiders and manipulators exploit information asymmetry and structural advantages to harvest profits, coordinated wallets simultaneously dump assets; KOLs show public wallet losses, while related wallets profit.
The so-called "nearly 60% profitability" mostly comes from veteran players who have survived three years, while those who lost money and exited are not counted. Survivor bias is the biggest filter in the crypto world.
In short: the money made from crypto trading is not from "trading" itself, but from fees, information asymmetry, structural advantages, and harvesting rights. Retail investors are not investors—they are liquidity itself.
So both those who have lost and those temporarily profiting are just liquidity. People are naturally self-righteous, thinking they are smarter than others, so we all remain in the market proving our uniqueness 😄 After watching today's early morning FOMC, my feeling is: the decision itself (10 to 2 to maintain 3.75%—4.00%) is actually the least important part of the whole event. What is truly worth remembering is what Waller publicly announced — that the Fed will no longer provide forward guidance in the future. 1. What exactly is forward guidance? It is a product of the 2008 financial crisis. When interest rates dropped to zero that year and conventional ammunition was exhausted, the central bank only had "talking" as a tool: telling you in advance that "interest rates will remain low for the next two years," so the market would automatically price down forward rates, achieving easing without spending a penny. Over the next decade-plus, the "dot plot, statement wording, press conference hints" system became the global traders' survival manual — you are not trading today, but the tomorrow the central bank previews. 2. Why did Waller tear it up? Today, his exact words were "Do not pre-judge meeting outcomes," adding "unless a crisis occurs, the market should not overly rely on forward guidance." The logic is actually consistent: forward guidance is a tool from the zero interest rate era, using certainty to guide expectations; but now the Fed is in a rate hike cycle, the economy is "strongly expanding," inflation at 3.7% has been above the 2% target for more than five consecutive years, and any promise can be contradicted by the next data point, which damages credibility. He even refused to describe current financial conditions as "tightening," saying "neither willing nor able" — giving you no words to bet on. The history of guidance failures is not far off. The 2021 "inflation is just temporary" episode... [Federal Reserve Early Morning Decision] 10:2 Hold Steady, But Market Interpretation Is Far From "Positive"
At 2 a.m., the FOMC voted 10:2 to keep the interest rate unchanged at 3.75%—4.00%. The dissenting votes came from Governor Cook and Cleveland Fed President Mester, who advocated for a direct 25 basis point hike; this is Cook's first dissenting vote since becoming a governor, indicating rising internal inflation concerns.
The statement upgraded the economy from "solid" to "strong expansion," with inflation at 3.7%, exceeding the 2% target for over five consecutive years—hotter economy + higher inflation reads as "more hikes possible."
Waller explicitly rejected forward guidance, saying, "Don't preset meeting outcomes"—meaning the Fed will no longer give advance hints about its intentions; everything will depend on the data.
Market pricing is straightforward: a 78.4% probability of a 25 basis point hike in December, and over 50% probability of a cumulative 50 basis point hike by January next year.
The crypto market reacted realistically: BTC surged to 81,768 immediately after the decision, then volume sold off breaking below 80,000 in the afternoon before recovering to 80,150, down 1.6% over 24 hours; ETH was weaker, down 2.1%.
Why didn’t "no rate hike" lead to a rally? This time it’s not a dovish turn but a wait-and-see on data. In an environment without guidance, every key data point (Q3 GDP, September PCE) becomes a volatility amplifier. Don’t read "no hike today" as "no hikes in the future." #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC $ETH $SOL $NEAR, can the AI theme heat up and convert into on-chain demand? AI capital expenditure is driving up expectations for storage and computing power, but the infrastructure narrative must be validated through paid tasks, call volume, and developer retention. Cross-market tech volatility also reminds us that investment themes are not one-directional. If network usage and revenue rise simultaneously, the AI premium is justified; if there is only conceptual exposure and actual calls stagnate, I will lower valuation expectations.#Hormuz reopening plan emerges, can the oil price decline continue? $GOOGL Google earnings report bombed, I continue to short on the rebound! No matter how hot AI is, it can't stop the market from settling accounts!
The most interesting part of Google's earnings report is: cloud business grew 103%, looking very impressive, but the stock price fell about 10% in after-hours trading.
Why? Because the market not only looks at how much you earn, but also how much you spend and how much profit you finally keep.
Q3 revenue was $127.6 billion, below expectations; adjusted EPS was $2.67, lower than the market expectation of $3.02; free cash flow turned negative to about $9.1 billion. No matter how imaginative the AI business is, with continued expanding investment and advertising revenue missing expectations, the market naturally recalculates the valuation.
My direction is very clear: continue to be bearish on GOOGL in the short term, prioritize shorting opportunities on rebounds! For operations, refer to rebound resistance around $298-302, consider shorting in batches when under pressure, with a target initially at $286.
This time, I'm not focused on how beautifully the AI story is told, but whether the market is willing to keep paying for high investment. No matter how good the news is, if the stock price doesn't agree, you have to respect the market.
#谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 Tonight at 8:30 PM, the final battle deciding the fate of the Federal Reserve is coming, with the probability of a rate hike reaching 85%!
Q3 GDP preliminary, September PCE, and initial jobless claims will all be released simultaneously: 1. Core PCE is expected to be 0.3% month-over-month (last month 0.2%), 3.1% year-over-year (last month 3.0%)
2. GDP is expected to be 3.2% annualized quarter-over-quarter (Q2 was 2.2%). Additionally, September CPI has already been somewhat hot (0.6% month-over-month, 3.7% year-over-year), so there is mental preparation.
3. Initial jobless claims are expected to be 198,000-199,000, with the previous value at 194,000. If the data comes out below 190,000, pressure increases; above 210,000, pressure eases.
No bad news is good news!$DOOD This dealer is so blatant that they don't even bother to pretend anymore.
Over 10 million dollars net inflow in 30-day contracts, equivalent to forcibly buying 46% of the total market value. On the surface, the market looks calm, but underwater, they're quietly scooping up.
Controlling the market with such density, the resistance above is basically cleared. Anyone still stubbornly shorting at the top is purely leaving fuel for the main force to squeeze the shorts.
It's just a matter of when the dealer feels like it and hits the gas pedal to explode the price.Y Combinator's latest Requests for Startups clearly positions crypto directions: stablecoins, asset tokenization, institutional products, trading, privacy-enabled scalable chains, and AI Agents using crypto networks for financial rails.
The key is that it doesn't treat crypto as a new asset class but places it back into payments, financing, trading, and software infrastructure. YC is not betting on which Token will rise, but on which financial activities will be reorganized.
The driving force has shifted over the past year. Consumer speculation has given way to institutional demand: risk hedging, corporate cross-border fund transfers, and more efficient settlement. If this shift holds, the 2027 RWA competition won't be about who puts assets on-chain first, but who controls issuance standards, who has compliance interfaces, and who has liquidity.
Data also confirms this. The top ten categories of on-chain RWA assets total about $38 billion, with U.S. Treasuries at $14.6 billion accounting for 38.4%, commodities at $5.15 billion, and stocks at $3.61 billion. The most mature demand remains cash management and low-volatility yields, with USDT and USDC having the largest individual scales.
So, "RWA getting busier" does not mean "all RWA will rise." Those with real underlying assets and compliant custody will attract institutional money; those with issuance but no application will gradually lose attention. $ONDO is worth following for issuance standards and channels, not sentiment.比特币今天短线偏震荡，反弹别急着看高，先别把反抽当反转。以太坊更弱，卖盘占上风，反弹后还有回落压力。觉得分析有帮助，记得点个关注、点个赞，你的支持就是我持续更新的最大动力。 比特币近12小时低点在79,709.50，高点在81,434.40。比特币公开表态里看多的人明显更多，可公开成交里卖出金额更重，这就是眼下的矛盾。看多声音能托住情绪，却未必托住价格。近期价格从区间上沿滑到下沿附近，又被买回，说明低位有人接，但买盘没有连续占优。个别大额成交还在加空，同时也有减空买回，方向并不齐。接下来就看下沿附近能不能接住，以及反弹能不能带量站上区间中部。人多未必能托价，成交更诚实。 以太坊近12小时低点在2,293.93，高点在2,368.31。以太坊的卖压更直接。反弹更容易被卖单压回去。公开成交里卖出金额明显压过买入，买盘没有形成连续承接。价格从近期区间上沿回落后，只在下沿上方反抽，力度不算强。那条看多观点只是转述大账户的多单，不能当成现货买盘，也覆盖不了眼前的卖出成交。短线若下沿附近接不住，回落会更顺；反过来，只有买入成交转强并站回区间中部，反弹才像样。现在说它转强，证据不够。 先看下沿能否接#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温
On October 29 Beijing time, the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target rate range at 3.75% to 4.00% with 10 votes in favor and 2 against. This is the first pause since the rate hikes resumed in September, but it does not indicate a policy shift.
The dissenting votes came from Governor Cook and Cleveland Fed President Mester, both advocating an immediate 25 basis point hike. Cook cast his first dissenting vote in office, signaling that internal FOMC disagreements over the pace of tightening have entered the voting record.
Inflation still does not support the Fed stopping. September CPI rose 3.7% year-on-year, core CPI rose 2.6%, both higher than previous values; PPI rose 6.3% year-on-year. Chair Powell reiterated that inflation still faces a "sixth year of overshoot" and clearly stated no forward guidance would be provided, refusing to predict the future path. On the employment side, cooling appeared: September nonfarm payrolls increased by only 29,000, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%, providing the Fed a window to wait and see.
Market consensus still expects a 25 basis point hike in December. FedWatch shows the probability of a December hike after the meeting is 83.1%, only slightly down from before the meeting. Institutions like CICC and Goldman Sachs also expect action in December, then continued observation.
However, "high probability" does not mean "set in stone." Rising US Treasury yields and mortgage rates, refinancing pressure on commercial real estate, and other financial stability constraints may limit further tightening space. The core signal conveyed by the October decision is: the tightening bias has not reversed, but policy certainty has decreased, and data dependence has been pushed to the extreme.BTC's net ETF inflow this year is almost zero, yet the price has only dropped about 7%! Is the selling pressure on Bitcoin really easing?
On October 29, CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju pointed out a noteworthy phenomenon: since the beginning of this year, Bitcoin ETF net inflows have been close to zero, but BTC's cumulative price decline is only about 7%.
What makes this data interesting is that the ETF, an important incremental buyer, has not shown significant activity for now, yet Bitcoin has not experienced the sharp decline some investors expected. In other words, the market has lost an important buyer, but the price remains relatively resilient.
Ki Young Ju believes this may indicate limited large-scale selling pressure from early holders and miners, or it could mean some investors who originally intended to sell have already reduced their holdings. If this assessment is correct, the market might be going through a phase where new buying is weak, but the active selling force is not as large as imagined.
However, caution is necessary here. **Price resistance to decline does not equal confirmation that no one is selling coins.** Net ETF inflow close to zero only indicates limited net fund changes through this channel; it does not mean there are no other buyers in the entire market, nor can the true scale of selling by early holders or miners be inferred solely from the price drop.
Next, there is a key variable: the policy and market uncertainty brought by the U.S. midterm elections.The PCE data will be released at 8:30 PM. From an intuitive perspective, this data doesn't look optimistic. For specifics, you can refer to the CPI and PPI data from two weeks ago, both leaning hawkish and hot narratives. After all, high oil prices have persisted for so long, especially diesel prices which affect the US logistics industry and eventually pass through to consumer goods, making it really hard to suppress.
However, thanks to the previous high CPI and PPI data that have already caused two waves of market shocks, as long as today's third wave isn't too extreme, the market can actually withstand it. It might even turn a disaster into a blessing if it's not ridiculously bad.
Currently, the market expects September core PCE to be 0.3% month-over-month and 3.1% year-over-year; overall PCE to be 0.5% month-over-month and 3.6% year-over-year. Against the backdrop of high oil prices, as long as the final published value is less than or equal to expectations, it's a victory (provided they aren't playing decimal rounding games).
If the PCE data is unexpectedly mild and dovish, the possible breakthrough point might occur in the handling of the airline ticket weighting coefficient conversion. In any case, when the data is released, you can quickly check whether the core monthly rate is 0.2% or 0.3% to judge the heat level. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 📉 After Google's (GOOGL) earnings report was released, it faced a significant sell-off, with the stock price dropping from $328.04 to $288.22. Market sentiment quickly weakened, and retail investors' panic intensified. But what truly deserves attention is the different choices made by capital during the decline. 🐋 According to raw data, there are 19 accounts on Hyperliquid increasing their long positions in GOOGL, with a total scale of about $20.56 million. While the market is still digesting the impact of the earnings report, some large funds seem to have already started looking for potential rebound opportunities. Does this mean a bottom is forming? It's too early to conclude. 🔎 Next, focus on three signals: - Earnings impact: Is the market digesting short-term performance pressure, or reassessing Google's future growth expectations? - Capital movement: The increase in long positions is noteworthy, but it must be judged in conjunction with position changes, liquidation risks, and subsequent price trends. - BTC correlation: If the overall risk appetite in the crypto market declines, BTC's trend may also affect capital sentiment; if BTC remains strong, observe whether this divergence can continue. ⚠️ Remember: Large funds opening longs does not mean the price will immediately reverse, and an increase in positions does not mean these accounts are already profitable. Real opportunities require price confirmation, not just betting based on whale movements. Do not blindly bottom-fish, nor be driven by panic. Pay attention to capital flows and wait for the market to provide answers. #GOOGL #BTC #HyperliSisters!
The most dangerous thing about this $ETH drama is not that it has fallen, but that after it falls, it tries to lure the bulls back with a few rebound candlesticks!
It surged to 2391 earlier, then dropped back to 2292. In such a short market move, whether chasing the rise or bottom fishing, anyone can get confused and lose direction!
Now ETH is back around 2319, the 15-minute MACD histogram has turned positive again, indicating short-term repair, but the price has not yet reclaimed the previous high near 2390.
Regarding the October Federal Reserve meeting, the result is out: interest rates remain at 3.75%–4%, but two voting members advocated for a rate hike, and the statement emphasized that inflation remains high.
A pause in rate hikes does not mean a shift to easing; future policy still carries uncertainty. Whether December will see further tightening depends on inflation and economic data.
This is what I am cautious about now: the market may treat "no rate hike for now" as good news but overlook that the hawkish signals have not disappeared.
If optimistic expectations are prematurely priced in, once subsequent data disappoints, risk assets may come under pressure again.
Next, focus on the rebound resistance between 2330–2340 and whether the previous low at 2292 will be tested again.
If the rebound is blocked, watch for shorting opportunities.
Sisters, don’t treat the pause in rate hikes as risk being cleared!
I maintain a bearish bias but do not blindly short.
$BTC
$ZEC
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $AXIS
AXIS dropped from 0.2235 to a low of 0.1312 within 24 hours, now at 0.1366, down nearly 39%. Okx perpetual contracts traded over 36 million USD in one day.
The numbers are even more interesting: total supply is 1 billion tokens, but only 165 million are circulating, with a market cap under 30 million USD, yet the fully diluted valuation is listed at 180 million. The trading volume is more than three times the market cap; this isn’t just turnover, it’s a queue to exit. The funding rate has turned negative, open interest is only 2 million USD, the liquidity is pitifully thin, and a few sell orders can push the price down by ten percent.
The peak of 0.37 was just a short while ago, with many profit-taking positions on board. 84% of the tokens are still locked up in warehouses, and every rebound is a selling window for them. I don’t touch this kind of token; I’ll consider it again when the circulating supply doubles after a crash.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #Google Q3 revenue growth, net profit decline, and earnings per share below expectations
My view is: the core contradiction in Google's earnings report is not insufficient revenue growth, but whether profits can keep pace after continuous AI investment.
Revenue growth shows that Google's core business remains resilient, but the decline in net profit and earnings per share below expectations also reflect the market's increasing demands for profit quality and cost control.
Especially in the context of intensifying AI competition, Google needs to find a balance between search advertising, cloud business, and AI infrastructure. AI may indeed open new growth opportunities, but computing power, data centers, and R&D investments will also bring huge cost pressures.
Going forward, I am more focused on three aspects:
1. Advertising business: Whether search ads can maintain growth determines the stability of Google's foundation.
2. Cloud business and AI commercialization: Whether AI investments can be converted into actual revenue, not just increased capital expenditure.
3. Profit margin and cash flow: Whether revenue growth can ultimately translate into profit is the key to judging long-term value.
My conclusion is: we cannot be bullish just because of revenue growth, nor bearish simply because earnings per share fall short of expectations.
In the short term, disappointing earnings may pressure the stock price; in the long term, what truly determines Google's valuation is whether AI can continuously generate revenue and whether profitability can keep up with investment.
In the AI era, the market is not short of growth stories, but lacks profits that can be realized. $BTC Ethereum ETFs are approaching an unpleasant historical record: a net outflow of about $1.32 billion since October, just about $100 million short of the $1.42 billion record set in November 2025, with only a few trading days left. Meanwhile, Bitcoin ETFs have quietly been attracting funds, with a net inflow of $137.3 million just yesterday, of which IBIT contributed $136 million.
1. What has changed?
Funds are choosing BTC over ETH. ETH ETFs have seen net outflows for three consecutive days, with ETHA alone seeing a single-day outflow of $44.8 million; Bitcoin ETFs have accumulated about $424 million in inflows over the past three trading days.
2. Why is this noteworthy?
BlackRock is simultaneously using IBIT to capture BTC buying demand while transferring nearly $200 million in ETH to Coinbase within two days. The same issuer is making distinctly different moves on these two major assets. This is not retail sentiment; it is institutional money making a choice.
3. Which market observation is currently more supported?
The data supports the view that ETH is temporarily weaker than BTC at the institutional allocation level, rather than a full bearish outlook. Whether the tokens transferred on-chain to exchanges are actually being sold as real selling pressure, and whether the October outflow record will ultimately be broken, are the key confirmation signals to watch in the next two days.
If the record is indeed broken in the last three days, the story will become hard to ignore. Feel free to discuss in the comments whether you think ETH is being unfairly punished or if this is justified. $ETH $UNI The current ledger of UNI simply can't withstand detailed scrutiny.
The official issuance budget is 20 million tokens, and even if all the burned tokens are included, there is still a net inflation of 8 million tokens for the whole year.
Additionally, the recent protocol fee output is also declining.
The buying pressure was weak to begin with, and now it can't absorb the daily new tokens being released.
Buyback and burn is just for show, the issuance budget is the real deal. Without new external money coming in, the excess tokens can only be forcibly dumped onto the market, and the continuous downward drift is not without reason.
#UNI
$UNI
👇#Google Q3 revenue growth, net profit decline, earnings per share below expectations Data as of 17:40 on the 29th: Bitcoin 80,094, down 1.7% in 24 hours, intraday low 79,883; Ethereum 2,318 down 2.3%; among the top ten by market cap, only TRX remains unchanged. In the past 24 hours, about $356 million worth of long positions in crypto contracts were liquidated—not retail small orders, but those leveraged positions hanging in the air waiting for a rebound. First, why I consider this earnings report relevant to crypto. Q3 revenue grew, but profit dropped and earnings per share missed expectations; these two facts together have only one explanation: computing power procurement and depreciation are eating into the profit statement. This is the common ledger for the entire AI trading sector. Another large-scale company pushed cloud business growth to 48% in the same period, which also means capital expenditures will continue to increase. The market used to buy into revenue growth, but now it’s starting to ask who is paying this money and when it will return. In the same week, tech stocks led by Samsung plunged, triggering this round of risk aversion; silver fell about 56% from its January high, hitting the lowest point of the year. Even safe-haven assets are being sold, indicating that what is lacking now is not a story, but liquidity. The question of where the money comes from has played out historically. Before the Nasdaq peaked in March 2000, telecom operators borrowed to lay fiber optics, equipment vendors had orders booked two years ahead, Cisco’s market value peaked that month, then dropped 80% over the next year. Orders followed capital expenditures, and capital expenditures followed financing, financingIt's been a day since the resolution was implemented, no clear direction yet, but the K-line is starting to tell a new story
First, look at $BTC lows: 79220, 79377, 79505, today 79709. Over the past week, each pullback bottom has been moving higher. Now look at the highs, from 84899 down to 81820, each time lower than the last
The support below is moving up, the resistance above is moving down, the two plates are slowly tightening. This is not calm, it's compression. The tighter the spring is squeezed, the stronger the rebound will be
There might be some movement tonight. Amazon's earnings report after market close, previously Google’s profit declined, Microsoft Azure exceeded expectations. The sentiment of tech stocks is all hanging on this AWS shot. If it’s good, risk appetite could push BTC to test the upper boundary. If it fails, this squeeze might break downward directly
So don’t be fooled by the boring market now, tonight is not the time to watch a show, it’s the time to watch the lines
The positions remain the same: above 81800 to 82000, below 79200 to 79700. Whichever side breaks out with volume first means the squeeze is broken. Follow that move, don’t bet heavily within the range
If you think the direction will come out tonight, press 1; if you think it will grind longer, press 2
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $AMZN $ETH #Pratinjau Laporan Keuangan Palantir: Apakah Pertumbuhan Tinggi Bisa Mendukung Penilaian Tinggi Palantir will announce its Q3 financial report after the US stock market closes on November 2, with the exact date pending official confirmation. Previously, Q2 revenue grew 93% year-over-year, US commercial business increased 149%, and the company subsequently raised its annual revenue guidance. In the context of high valuation, can Q3 orders and revenue continue strong growth?