Orbit Post Sitemap
#AMD data center revenue nearly doubled, revenue and guidance both exceeded expectations
Tonight's small nonfarm payrolls are interesting
New jobs added: 86,000
17,000 more than expected
But it's the same as the revised data from last month
Is the job market really that strong
Or was everyone too pessimistic before?
September originally reported 90,000 new jobs
Now revised down to 86,000
That means
Although October exceeded market expectations
Job growth did not continue to accelerate
This is different from what many people understand
On the surface, employment exceeded expectations
In reality, it’s just not as bad as the market feared
But for the bulls on the big coin
This may not necessarily be good news
After all, everyone has been hoping for a rate cut in December
The more resilient the employment data
The less urgent the Fed has to ease policy
Previously, the market worried about economic weakness
Thinking a rate cut might come soon
Now with employment better than expected
The rate cut issue has to be reconsidered
However, 86,000 new jobs
Can’t be considered a sudden takeoff in the job market
Relying on just one small nonfarm report
To conclude no rate cut in December
Is obviously too early
$BTC $ETH #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 This time it is a "White House vs. Congress standoff," with the market's main theme shifting from "expectations of large-scale fiscal expansion" to "policy deadlock, making new stimulus difficult to implement." However, the Federal Reserve, U.S. inflation, and corporate earnings remain the core determinants of the trend. The election mainly changes the pace, sector premiums, and short-term volatility, but it is unlikely to reverse the overall trend.
Favorable for gold
The weakening dollar + limited rise in long-term U.S. Treasury yields make real interest rates more likely to fall, which is positive for gold prices; at the same time, political risks such as the debt ceiling and government shutdown will also temporarily boost gold's safe-haven demand. $XAG 最近这一轮加密行情走高，核心推手是空单挤压，并不是现货买盘带动的普涨反弹，清算数据能够体现这一点。比特币（$BTC）的空头平仓压力最为突出，24小时内有3374万美元空头被清算，多头清算仅670万美元，短时间内连续爆仓，形成自我强化的止损踩踏，并非平稳的价格重估。 以太坊（$ETH）走势和比特币相近，清算规模更大，24 小时空头清算量达到 3487 万美元，多头亏损只是附带结果，行情主线依旧是空单被动平仓。 CORE（$CORE）则走出不一样的双向清洗行情，价格先被挤压推高，随后行情反转，多头集中遭到清算，一小时内全部清算都来自多头，展现出挤压行情退去之后买盘快速消失的真空状态。 这里有一个关键点：当$BTC、$ETH的清算清单以空头为主时，行情反映的是持仓结构，并不是市场看多的共识。一旦被动平仓带来的买盘消耗完毕，支撑上涨的边际力量就会消失。 现在还不好判断这次挤压是不是已经把拥挤的空头出清完毕，或是仅仅重新调整了持仓。如果后续清算数据转向以多头为主，那么这一波反弹的动力大概率就耗尽了。 $BTC $ETH $CORE#CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% However, the issuance volume of usdc is declining$BTC just saw its trading volume more than double during that recent drop. I was a bit surprised to see that bearish candle close so quickly. Earlier, the price steadily climbed above 78,000, but the trading volume kept shrinking. This is a classic case of volume increasing on the drop but decreasing on the rise, indicating a lack of buying support.
Then, during the subsequent pullback candles, the trading volume quickly shrank again. The volume during the rebound was only about 40% of the previous twenty candles. The price pulled up slightly, but no one was willing to take orders above. The volume shrank during the rise, showing the bulls' momentum is weakening.
Switching to the 4-hour timeframe to check the position. The current price just hit the previous high near 78,000. This is a major resistance on a larger scale. The three 4-hour EMA lines are still in a bearish alignment. The overall market focus is sinking, and the downtrend continues.
Short-term, I lean bearish. The top is pressing against strong 4-hour resistance. A volume-shrinking rise can’t break through such strong resistance; without volume expansion, it won’t push through. I expect the market to first turn down for a wave.
$ETH $SOL #美伊谈判未突破，油价为何单日跌逾7%？ $ETH has fallen more than $BTC, but that doesn't mean it's worse
At 4 AM close, both $BTC and $ETH were below the midnight opening price.
Some see $ETH's larger drop and assume it's going to have problems.
Here's how the number is calculated: $ETH's last hour closing difference accounts for nearly half of the four-hour net decline.
In other words, the sharp drop was caused by that last push.
$BTC's last push only recovered 23.1 USDT, not even half of the previous hour's decline.
Both are moving downward, just one stopped first while the other is still moving.
Only if $ETH's next candle closes above 2293.20 can it be said to have recovered the last hour.
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓
#$ETH $BTC A divided Washington is turning out to be bullish for crypto. As vote counting in the US midterms puts control of Congress in play, with Democrats projected to take the House, $BTC and $ETH have both pushed higher — a move that looks counterintuitive only until you separate politics from liquidity. The first driver is fiscal. Divided government makes large-scale spending expansion harder to pass. For a market that has spent months pricing inflation risk and the interest-rate path, that gridlock $CRCL earnings report exploded, but the funds haven't come back at all!
Pre-market surged 3%, many people directly called it a turning point for the crypto sector.
Only after breaking down Circle's Q3 earnings report do you understand: this beat expectations is a "one-time cash injection" piled up.
Revenue 865 million, expected 777 million; EPS 0.84, far exceeding the expected range; net profit 226 million, a direct doubling beat.
Behind the impressive data lies the core catch:
Of the 207 million in other income, 182 million comes from Arc token presale, which is a one-time gain and not replicable.
The real main business—USDC reserve interest income—declined 8% year-on-year, only 658 million.
In short: making the earnings report look good by selling tokens, while the core interest spread business that sustains them is weakening.
The market had already priced in pessimistic expectations early: CRCL halved from the high of 140.
Combined with the recent large-scale Binance theft incident, what the market lacks now is not stories, but trust premium.
The beat on earnings is just on paper; whether funds recognize it is another matter.
Arc presale is a one-off deal; reserve yield is Circle's fundamental trump card.
Without the trump card warming up, relying solely on EPS benefits is unlikely to drive large-scale crypto fund inflows.
Key observation: whether it can hold above 75 at open. Holding above 75 means a chance for recovery; failing to hold means this earnings boost is just a short-term bull trap.
#CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% Midterm Election Night: Three Outcomes, Three Crypto Scenarios
First, the odds: Pre-election House Republicans 218:214, Senate 53:47; Cook predicts Democrats net gain of 9-19 House seats , and the president's party has lost seats in 36 of 38 midterms . The baseline scenario is already clear.
Scenario One: Democrats Take the House (High Probability)
House Financial Services Committee changes leadership—Maxine Waters at the helm, and if the Senate Banking Committee flips, Elizabeth Warren takes over .
Bankless hit the key point: The crypto industry fears not who opposes it, but who controls the agenda—the committee can kill bills without a vote .
Market projection: CLARITY Act (market structure bill) progress stalls , expectations for compliant institutional entry cool down. Short-term sentiment is bearish, but this is a "priced-in negative"—most already priced before the election, actual passage might clear the way for a rebound.
Scenario Two: Democrats Sweep Both Chambers (Low Probability, Biggest Impact)
The path to regulatory clarity is completely uprooted, stablecoin and market structure legislation fully blocked . This outcome resembles the 2022 scenario—the political shift will reprice the entire industry valuation. Tether's government affairs head has long warned: whether Washington's current friendly stance lasts depends on the midterms .
Scenario Three: Republicans Hold Both Chambers (Low Probability, Most Favorable Scenario)
The probability of CLARITY Act passing in 2027 greatly increases , combined with current White House SEC/CFTC personnel, the compliant capital channel fully opens. This is the only outcome that can sustain the "institutional bull" narrative.
📌 My judgment in three points:
① Short term (1-2 weeks), the election is a supporting actor. The drop to 77k was mainly due to Fed rate hikes + Brent oil at 110 . The election result only determines the slope of the rebound, not the direction—the direction is in the Fed's hands.
② Medium term (until 2027), the election is the main actor. The crypto space has benefited from "regulatory clarity" these past two years: GENIUS Act, CLARITY progress, ETF channels. Once legislation stalls, institutional capital's narrative material disappears—then declines won't need macro factors to assist.
③ Don't chase the volatility of election night. Multiple House seats are within 1%, mail-in ballots take days, so tonight there will be no "definitive result," only "definitive noise." Historically, year-end rebounds after midterms are statistical patterns, but only if macro doesn't drag—currently macro is dragging.
Final numbers: The crypto industry spent $189 million on this election , even Musk spent $366 million supporting Republicans .
The money is all in. Next is the draw time—but remember, the draw decides the 2027 story; tonight's candlesticks are still controlled by the Fed.
Which scenario do you think will come true? Just saw an interesting piece of news: The French National Assembly passed an amendment with a vote of 150:44, requiring that crypto assets in self-custody wallets exceeding 100,000 euros (about 112,000 USD) must be reported annually to the tax authorities, with the threshold calculated as of December 31 each year.
On the same day, another amendment stating "capital gains tax exemption for crypto payments ≤ 1000 euros per year" was rejected 69:14. In other words: buying coffee with crypto is not tax-exempt, but holding six-figure amounts in your own wallet requires reporting.
Web3 always claims that on-chain data is public and transparent, and intermediaries are unnecessary, yet regulators still require you to prove "this address is yours." Technology could have solved trust long ago, but the system still demands human verification.
This amendment has not yet become law; it must pass the first reading in the National Assembly on 11/17 and the Senate on 11/20. But the direction is clear: self-custody is shifting from "no reporting obligation" to "reporting obligation."
What really needs consideration is not the reporting itself, but what happens after submitting that form. What do you all think? 🪙
#Web3 #CryptoRegulation #France #Bitcoin #SelfCustody 🚨 ETH IS QUIETLY STARTING TO OUTPERFORM BITCOIN!
Ethereum is up 1.47%, slightly ahead of Bitcoin’s 1.30%.
It may look like a small difference, but relative strength matters. 👀
If ETH keeps leading, it could signal growing confidence in large-cap altcoins.
Now the big question: Can buyers sustain this momentum, or is it just another short-lived bounce?
Watch the volume. Wait for confirmation. No FOMO. 📊
#ETH #BTC #CryptoMarket #Trading #SonyQ2GamingAndMusic
#DailyOrbit Whale “Landlord” Three-Coin Short Positions Exposed: Floating Profit of 7.24 Million, Funding Fees Collected Nearly 12 Million
On-chain monitoring shows that the whale known as the “Landlord” has updated perpetual contract positions: BTC, ETH, and SOL short positions running in parallel, with a total nominal position of about $640 million, leverage only 5–7x full position, clearly a strategy biased towards long-term funding fee earnings.
Breaking it down, BTC short position is 2,319.6 coins, entry price $76,366.1, currently floating loss of $1.1849 million, but funding fees already credited $3.5374 million; ETH short position is 92,500 coins, entry price $2,322.72, floating profit $6.5669 million, funding fee income $4.5017 million; SOL short position is 696,100 coins, entry price $94.3346, floating profit $1.8605 million, funding fee income $3.9493 million.
The three funding fees total about $11.9884 million, overall unrealized P&L about +$7.2425 million, total margin about $86.419 million. Their liquidation prices are approximately $138,569, $3,786.92, and $292.55 respectively, with a large gap from current prices. Low leverage, high liquidation prices combined with continuous funding fees are the keys for this position set to withstand volatility and collect cash flow. I'm looking at the news now, feeling a bit conflicted: afraid of missing out, but also afraid of mistaking hype for opportunity. I lost quite a bit in the past couple of years and am still slowly recovering. When I see words like "institutional entry," I get a bit excited, but I also remind myself not to celebrate for the account too quickly.
This time, according to Solana, Schroders will collaborate with Centrifuge to bring an emerging market debt fund onto Solana. This is Schroders' first fund on this chain. What strikes me is not how grand "first fund" sounds, but what kind of assets are starting to be onboarded on-chain.
My judgment is that this is a relatively positive exploration of real assets going on-chain, but it shouldn't be directly taken as a bullish sign for related tokens. Where a fund chooses to launch on-chain and where the value ultimately flows are two different things; if actual usage brings sustained demand, then there is more reason to discuss the impact on the ecosystem—this is my speculation.
Another distinction to make is between on-chain and asset risk. An emerging market debt fund doesn't automatically become a low-risk product just because it changes its platform. The materials also don't explain admission criteria, fees, or redemption arrangements, so I can't yet judge how much convenience ordinary users will get.
My reminder to myself this time is: first see how the product operates, then listen to how appealing the narrative is. To friends who are also recovering losses, don't get discouraged by going slow 💪 How is everyone's mindset lately? For this kind of fund going on-chain, do you most want to clarify the admission threshold first, or the redemption rules?Several recent hacker attacks may strengthen the demand for privacy coins:
1. Binance was hacked for about $6.34 billion, Brazil's Mercado Bitcoin exchange was hacked for over $40 million, and the French banking group Crédit Mutuel Arkéa was hacked for over $133 million. The hackers in the latter case converted the stolen funds into stablecoins and ETH, eventually transferring them into Monero;
2. Privacy coins have clearly strengthened recently, with $ZEC rising above $1,200, returning to the top ten by market cap, and $XMR hovering around $630. This may include hacker money laundering buy orders;
3. This is a double-edged sword—privacy technology can also be used to prevent hackers: holdings, counterparties, and fund flows are no longer publicly visible on-chain, making it much harder for hackers to first identify target institutions and specific individuals and then gradually break in as happened this time.
Reposted from HigerIf Trump loses the election, the trading expectations in the crypto space for “loose regulation + US BTC strategic reserve” will quickly retract. In the short term, BTC/ETH will be under pressure, and Trump-related Meme coins will crash; in the medium term, SEC regulations will tighten again, putting more pressure on altcoins. But if Congress is divided, the difficulty of implementing regulations will increase; in the long term, the crypto market will still be dominated by Federal Reserve liquidity, and the election is only a short-term disturbance. $ETH and $ZEC will both plunge, so come open short positions.$AAPL Folks, AAPL's trading action is ridiculously wild. Damn it! The 339.47 level has been stuck sideways for a long time, with wicks poking up and down shaking out positions, volume squeezed like toothpaste—it's obvious the big players are gearing up for a major move. I've been watching all morning; I've seen this kind of unusual trading pattern many times before—it's a classic sign of a capital showdown, and there's likely a big move coming. Take my advice: don't chase the highs, buy in batches around 339.47, keep your position under 30%, and if it breaks below 334, admit you're wrong and exit. I don't dare shout about this wild action openly; those who understand can lay low with me. 👇👇👇
The above is just my personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Contract leverage carries extremely high risk; please manage your position size yourself and bear your own profits and losses.$PEPE Binance's PEPE has created a withdrawal gap of 35 million dollars, but looking at the sell walls in the spot order book, the total doesn't even reach 30 million.
The exchange has now become the largest passive long position in the entire network. If users insist on withdrawing coins and the platform has no inventory, it can only reluctantly buy at market price to fill the gap. On the demand side, there are tens of millions of forced buy orders waiting, while the supply side's chips have long been squeezed by big players. With such thin sell orders, once the buying program starts, the shorts above probably won't even have time to read the forced liquidation messages.
#PEPE
$PEPE
👇Midterm elections concluded, the Nasdaq stopped falling and rebounded. $BTC is expected to see a wave of rebound!
I believe in a short-term rebound, with a potential test of $80,000-$82,000 in the coming days, but I do not expect a direct breakthrough of $84,000 for now.
From the daily chart, BTC found support around $76,000-$78,000, KDJ shows a golden cross at a low level, RSI6 is about 41.5, and selling pressure has eased somewhat.
However, MACD is still below the zero line, the daily trend has not yet reversed, and the current condition is more consistent with an oversold recovery.
Regarding the US stock market, the Nasdaq rose about 0.8% yesterday. Today, after a sharp drop, the Nasdaq 100 futures rebounded. The Democratic Party won control of both houses of Congress, and the market was briefly worried about stricter AI and crypto regulations, but risk sentiment later recovered.
The uncertainty from the elections is gradually fading, which is favorable for a short-term rebound in BTC, but policy differences will still limit the upside.
I am more inclined to see BTC first rebound to test $80,000, then challenge $82,000. $76,000 is an important support level; breaking below $75,000 would invalidate this rebound judgment.
Whether $82,000 can break out with volume will determine if there is a chance to retest $84,000-$87,000.
Currently, it is not advisable to blindly short at low levels, but it is also not yet time for a full bull market. Short-term bullish, mid-term still needs confirmation. First watch $82,000; do not prematurely fantasize about a new major uptrend before the breakout.🔥 Is holding BTC only about waiting for the price to rise? Core wants to offer Bitcoin holders an additional way to earn!
Core's dual staking mechanism attempts to combine BTC with $CORE.
₿ Stake BTC to participate in the BTCFi ecosystem.
🟠 Allocate and stake CORE to increase the corresponding CORE ratio.
⚡ Earn different reward tiers based on the allocation ratio between CORE and BTC.
The most noteworthy aspect of this mechanism is:
It makes CORE not just an independently traded token, but potentially an important component for BTC holders to participate in the Core ecosystem and enhance their reward tiers.
However, several questions ultimately determine whether this mechanism can succeed long-term:
1️⃣ Are BTC holders willing to allocate additional CORE?
2️⃣ Are the different reward tiers attractive enough?
3️⃣ Can the rewards be sustained without relying on short-term incentives?
4️⃣ Can dual staking generate real demand for CORE?
If BTCFi continues to develop, could CORE become a key link connecting Bitcoin assets with on-chain finance?
Would you be willing to allocate extra $CORE to increase your BTC staking rewards?
#CORE #CoreDAO #BTCFi #Bitcoin #DualStakingThe minor non-farm payrolls exceeded expectations but no one cared, while the crypto market softened during this time
The two minor non-farm payroll reports came out: October ADP added 86,000 jobs, higher than the expected 69,000, showing no slowdown in employment. However, the market reaction was muted, as everyone is focused on the elections, leaving the employment report sidelined.
US stock futures rose cheerfully, Dow futures surged 1.8%, and the dollar continued to fall. Switching back to crypto, Bitcoin didn’t rise but fell, dropping from 78,556 to 78,273; Ethereum touched 2,327 but was pushed back to 2,315; SOL softened to 92.8.
This divergence is worth pondering. Strong employment means the Federal Reserve has even less reason to ease up; high interest rates will remain, and crypto, which is most sensitive to liquidity, can’t hold up. While others use the election narrative to push prices up, crypto can’t even break resistance, which itself is telling.
$BTC at 78,273, with resistance at 79,056 and 79,251 backed by 21.8 million, and support at 77,099 with 28.8 million is the recent key level.
$ETH at 2,315, 2,327 has already been tested and failed, next resistance at 2,344, support at 2,286 and 2,245.
$SOL at 92.8 remains the weakest, with a wall at 95.1 and above.
There’s a major non-farm payroll report on Friday; continue holding short positions, no chasing.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 #On-chain tokenized stock scale hits new highs, traditional financial institutions accelerate layout
The leader has something to say
The scale of on-chain tokenized stocks has hit new highs, and traditional financial institutions are accelerating their layout—this is a long-term foundational signal, not a short-term starting gun.
According to market statistics, the circulating scale of on-chain tokenized stocks is about $3.8 billion, breaking records for 10 consecutive weeks. On November 2, Securitize added 13 new tokenized US stocks on Solana (including ExxonMobil, Disney, Uber), bringing the total to 25; the NYSE partnered with Broadridge to provide on-chain voting and transfer services, but implementation still awaits regulatory approval. The compliance channel is getting longer and more stable, which is a trend worth noting.
But be clear: $3.8 billion is only about 0.15% of the total crypto market cap of approximately $2.58 trillion. The new high is mainly driven by the number of listings; on-chain depth, liquidity, and arbitrage efficiency remain unverified; the issuer blacklist is expanding, and resistance has not disappeared. This benefits the SOL ecosystem narrative (SOL current price about $93, slight intraday rise), but it does not mean a full market capital inflow.
Back to BTC: current price about 78,500, resistance at 78,960, support at 75,795, intraday rebound about 3.6% is still an oversold recovery. RWA is a slow variable; BTC's short-term rhythm is still determined by ETF net flows, US dollar interest rates, and risk appetite; ETF has not turned positive, fear index only 26, no matter how good the foundation is, don't go all in early.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC U.S. CFTC Chairman Selig issued a statement on November 3: perpetual contracts based on single stocks (Equity Perps) can be listed and traded on CFTC-registered exchanges starting that day. This is the first expansion of perpetual contracts into traditional securities since the approval of Bitcoin perpetuals in May this year. How it was approved: The CFTC considers it "approved" under Regulation 40.3 and classifies them as "security futures products." This means they are regulated by both the CFTC and SEC, and must comply with both commodity and securities laws. Only exchanges that have registered security futures notices with the SEC can list them. What is still uncertain: The statement did not name any exchanges, specify which stocks, or provide a launch date. Coinbase's derivatives exchange submitted an application for single-stock perpetuals in September (under Regulation 41.23(b)), and Kalshi and Bitnomial have similar applications, but the statement did not clarify if these were the ones approved this time. So "trading today" currently seems more like the door has been opened, but who will list first is still unconfirmed. Risk points: CME sued the CFTC in June over the approval of Bitcoin perpetuals; the CFTC filed a motion to dismiss, and the case is ongoing. Additionally, on November 4, the Democrats took control of both houses of Congress, which may affect future oversight and legislative attitudes. What to watch next: the first officially listed exchange and the list of underlying assets; funds The market today went back and forth through the midterm election sentiment. After the news that the Democratic Party took control of Congress, BTC first dropped below $76,000 overnight, then rebounded in a V-shape to about $78,300, ETH around $2,317, with DeFi leading gains; CoinDesk's DeFi index rose about 5%.
My judgment: this looks more like a rebound after an emotional relief, not a trend reversal yet. The drop was due to political uncertainty, and the rebound was the fading of that uncertainty. The harder issue lies ahead: a Congress controlled by the blue camp means crypto legislation will need Democratic votes, and the industry's legislative agenda will have to be re-examined.
Don't just look at prices, watch the capital flows. This week, spot BTC ETFs are still seeing outflows, about $116M outflow on Tuesday alone, and previously about $398.6M on November 2. This means this rebound started before new ETF funds flowed back in. Analysts agree: for a sustained rise, ETFs need continuous net inflows and decisively break above $82,000; on the downside, the $76,000–$76,600 support must hold.
The next catalyst is Friday's US nonfarm payroll report. Before that, I consider $78,000 as the dividing line between rebound and bottoming: only above $82,000 do bulls have a case; below $76,000, the midterm election drop might just be the first leg. #Bitcoin Title: $BTC Long Positions Keep Growing Despite the Market Decline Since October 14, Bitcoin has dropped approximately 6%, yet Binance Open Interest has increased by 10%, reaching a 30-day high. Funding rates also remain positive. This suggests that traders are continuing to open long positions even as$BTC moves lower. The growing leverage against a declining price raises concerns about potential long-liquidation pressure. If buyers fail to defend key support levels, another downside move coulI always thought the money on-chain was moving everywhere, but I was proven wrong: less than 10% of stablecoins and tokenized assets are actually deposited into DeFi.
In other words, the majority of $USDT is just lying dormant in wallets, and the same goes for $USDC. We watch TVL rise and fall every day, chase after pools with high annual yields, but in the end, only a very small amount of money is actually playing.
It's a bit like a community swimming pool—looks lively, but out of thousands of people, only about twenty are actually swimming.
What is the rest of the money waiting for? Probably for a reason not to have to constantly watch the liquidation line every day.How much money is actually working on-chain? Token Terminal gives a rather unflattering answer: less than 10%.
This figure refers to the proportion of stablecoins and tokenized assets deposited into DeFi protocols. In other words, over 90% of $USDT, $USDC, and other dollar substitutes that are minted daily just quietly stay in wallets, exchanges, and custody accounts, without becoming lendable funds in lending pools.
This is not a new problem, but it is especially glaring now. The total amount of stablecoins has been rising continuously, and tokenized assets have been repeatedly described as a trillion-dollar track, yet new money coming in has not flowed through the pipeline into old protocols like $AAVE and $UNI. The money is piled up at the door, but the door hasn’t been opened.
Why doesn’t it go in? First, the returns are insufficient; when funds are abundant, lending rates are suppressed very low; second, custody inertia—most money prefers to stay where the counterparty is clear; third, tokenized assets are still in the early stages, with no standards on whether collateral is accepted or how liquidation is handled.
So the meaning of this data is not "DeFi is unused," but that the next round of incremental growth is not inside the crypto circle, but in that 90% of money that hasn’t moved yet. Whoever can make tokenized government bond assets into standardized collateral that can be liquidated will capture this increment, and the infrastructure for assets like $LINK going on-chain is also here.
Is 10% a ceiling or a starting line? No one can answer that. But one thing is certain: relying on shuffling existing coins between protocols leaves very little room.The "ID cards" of on-chain AI Agents have already been issued 1.88 million times, but the more I look at this number, the calmer I become.
According to agenteconomy statistics, as of November 3, about 1.88 million Agents have been registered across 24 chains in the ERC-8004 identity registries. Among them, the $BNB chain alone had 392,000 on October 26, with over 15,000 new registrations in one week.
Sounds impressive, but don't overlook two details: the statisticians themselves state this is just a "lower bound," as a single operator can batch register many IDs; the $BNB chain's count includes test, duplicate, and abandoned registrations, so it doesn't indicate whether an Agent has funds or is actively working.
My view: it's normal for the identity layer to lead, like phone numbers being issued before anyone makes calls. What really matters is "among Agents with identities, how many are continuously paying and taking orders." Until that ratio emerges, the ID count is more like an easily inflated metric. The risk lies here: projects that tell stories based on registration numbers will see their data collapse once the hype fades.
What do you think it takes for an Agent to truly be "working on-chain"?$BTC $BTC This rebound is more of a recovery after overselling and does not mean the risk has been cleared.
Previously, the price dropped to 75690, hitting a nearly seven-week low, followed by short-term buying that pushed it back up. However, it is worth noting that institutional funds remain cautious; on November 3, the spot BTC ETF still saw a net outflow of about $405 million, with long-term funds continuing to withdraw.
To confirm the sustainability of this rebound, three points need to be observed: the price stabilizing in the current range, ETF funds shifting from outflow to stable inflow, and trading volume increasing simultaneously. Until these conditions are met, it can only be defined as a rebound, not a trend reversal, and risk control should not be relaxed in operations. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 The leader has something to say
US Midterm Elections: Democrats win control of both chambers of Congress — crypto prices initially shocked then stabilized, reflecting the tug-of-war between regulatory expectations and liquidity expectations.
Voting on November 3, the Democrats secured at least 218 seats in the House and took control of the Senate. When the results came out, BTC briefly dropped 2.8%, as the market worried about tighter consumer protection legislation and obstacles to CLARITY-type bills; but after uncertainty faded and the dollar weakened, BTC made a V-shaped rebound, returning above $78,000, rising about 2% intraday.
Looking at history over a longer term: after the 2014, 2018, and 2022 midterms, BTC fell in the weeks following election day but was higher than on election day one year later, with an average 12-month gain of about 54%; the bottom timing was not fixed (71 days, 39 days, 1 day), so “post-election must rise” can only be a long-term reference and does not help short-term positions.#US Midterm Elections: Democrats win control of both chambers of Congress
BTC current price is about 78,500, rebounding about 3.6% intraday from the low of 75,795, with resistance at 78,960; only a stable break above this level will extend the rally; if 75,795 is lost, the rebound may still be a bull trap. Coupled with continuous net outflows from spot ETFs and a fear index of only 26, the political good news has not translated into capital inflows.
Heartfelt words: Elections are just the weather, the capital flow is the season. Don’t treat one result as a trend signal; position according to levels and data, not emotions $ZEC
$BTC $ETH We are currently in a phase where accumulation and game theory intertwine; this is not a window for chasing rallies. Are the long positions you hold following the structure or the sentiment? I reviewed the price movements after the 2018 and 2022 U.S. midterm elections, and BTC indeed experienced significant pullbacks post-election. But this time there is a key difference: in those two instances, the price was close to the previous year's lows, whereas now BTC is about 33% above the year's low. The position is different, and so is the derivatives structure. This is what truly concerns me. During high-level consolidation, perpetual contract open interest tends to be thicker than at lows, and funding rates are more easily pushed positive by bullish sentiment. Once the price stagnates, the holding cost of long leverage starts to bite, and even a slight downward wick can trigger a layer of forced liquidations, creating a self-reinforcing squeeze. Conversely, if the funding rate remains neutral or slightly negative and the price refuses to drop, shorts become the vulnerable side, and any upward breakout can easily turn into a short squeeze fuel. Therefore, historical charts can only serve as background noise. What really determines the rhythm are the open interest distribution, funding rates, and liquidation concentration zones. The bullish path lies in: after digesting overheated leverage during high-level consolidation, spot buying supports the price, and funding rates return to neutral—this kind of accumulation is actually a healthy turnover. The risk is: if funding rates remain persistently high while the price fails to make new highs, the crowding of longs will accelerate the decline, and altcoins usually experience more exaggerated pullbacks than BTC. My current judgment is that this period is better suited for monitoring structure rather than guessing direction. Watch if open interest cools down, watch if funding rates shift fromBored, I went to check Brother Maji's open positions and found that he has an ETH inverted pyramid plus BTC short combination.
I feel like every single order here maxes out the fault tolerance; if the market doesn't cooperate even a little, the first thing to collapse is the structure, not the judgment.
The ETH position is the most typical. At the low of 2269, he only dared to put in 3600 as the base position, but when it rose to 2427, he heavily added over 9800, an inverted pyramid add-on, pushing the average price to the most uncomfortable spot. Once it pulled back, the base position's profit was completely wiped out, and there was still a floating loss of 1.3 million. This kind of addition is equivalent to blocking the retreat path first.
The second position is a 5x long-term short on hype, opened at 72.8, with a floating loss of 3.46 million. Betting on valuation reversion logic is not wrong, but in a bull market, overvaluation can still rise more ridiculously; holding hard on the left side, time is on the opponent's side.
The BTC 40x short was opened at 78104, currently with a small profit, but 40x leaves no room to hold the position; if it really stabilizes above 80,000, this position will be the first to be forced out.
On the news front, tonight ADP has already been released and is hotter than expected; at 23:00, ISM data is still pending; the election results flipping the two chambers have just come out. The short-term market is a hedge between data and sentiment. In terms of market status, BTC is still grinding above the threshold, ETH rose then fell back, SOL is sideways and relatively weak, and ZEC is still the one that can run the most.
Going forward, I’m watching two triggers: one is BTC stabilizing above 80,000, educating the bears first; the other is whether ETH can hold its average price zone. My view remains unchanged: add positions only after a pullback confirmation; the inverted pyramid that gets heavier as it rises—whoever copies it pays the tuition first.Reserve certification is about 100,000 coins, CEO verbally about 150,000 coins, a difference of about 50,000 BTC.
CoinDesk quoted Paolo Ardoino at the Lugano Plan ₿ Forum saying: Tether holds about 150,000 BTC; estimated at about 78,340 at the time of writing, approximately $11.75 billion. Q3 reserve certified BTC line is about $8.37 billion (at about 83,621 then), implying about 100,060 coins, about 50,000 less than the verbal figure — the company previously stated that investment holdings and stablecoin reserves are separate.
Honestly, what really needs to be watched is which ledger the discrepancy falls into, not whether the verbal number is big or small.
Which do you trust more: the missing approximately 50,000 coins are in the investment holdings, or were they actually already counted in the reserve narrative?
Whenever the stablecoin giant updates its coin hoarding numbers, I break it down, so don’t miss out.
$BTC Trump said in one sentence, "We have done our best," basically declaring the overall situation settled.
What does it mean? The control of Congress is lost, and the previously hyped crypto-friendly bills and crypto capital plans are directly blocked and hard to advance.
The Democrats have taken both the House and Senate, a rare big win in forty years, but the biggest risk for the crypto community is not just the bills being stalled. The worst fear is sudden geopolitical news after election losses. Once news of military action in the Middle East breaks out, it will cause a double-sided shock, hitting both bulls and bears, and no one can escape.
The market has already priced in pessimistic expectations in advance, with Bitcoin showing a bearish pattern on the daily chart, ETFs continuously seeing outflows, and $ETH ETH ETFs bleeding even longer, making its rebound inherently weaker than $BTC BTC. Those who have recently doubled their gains are advised to take profits first and not to chase the tail end of the rally.$BTC
The nonfarm payrolls came out higher than expected. US stocks are all green pre-market, Trump Media down 10%, Tesla down 5.4%, Nasdaq futures have turned negative.
Normally BTC should have dropped along. It didn't. 78262, 24h still +1.4%, just 463 dollars below the 24h high of 78725.
I'm watching the volume. At 13:00 the 1H candle had 599 coins, 15:00 446, 18:00 312, 20:00 288, 21:00 222, steadily shrinking. The price is actually pushing up, the lows are raised step by step from 77264.
Open interest is also retreating. When I wrote at 19:53 it was 2.793 billion USD, now 2.767 billion, down 26 million. The fee rate is 0.0096%, not even reaching the 0.01% benchmark, premium -0.0476% still at a discount.
Shorts are reducing, longs are unwilling to pay a premium. This market is the most passive—it's not being pushed by anyone, no one is selling.
I never add positions at a top formed by shrinking volume. I'll wait for a volume surge to hold before considering.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 This crude oil market is really interesting.
When prices rise, they talk about war risks.
When prices fall, they say supply is recovering.
A few days ago, people were worried about not being able to buy oil.
Now, it's the opposite.
Is there almost no one willing to hold at $100 anymore?
Brent crude was previously above $110.
Now it has directly fallen below $100,
with a single-day drop of 3.6%📉
Earlier, the Middle East situation was tense,
and the market feared transportation disruptions.
This added a layer of war premium to oil prices.
Now that transportation is gradually recovering,
and concerns about supply interruptions have eased,
the risk premium that was previously driving prices up
may naturally be squeezed out slowly.
But the drop in oil prices
is not necessarily all good news for Bitcoin.
If the decline is due to supply recovery,
energy costs decrease,
and inflationary pressure may ease,
potentially giving the Federal Reserve more room to cut rates.
However, if the drop is due to weakening economic demand,
and people are using less oil,
then falling oil prices might actually be bad news.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC The $UNI exchange has disabled UNI withdrawals. After 7.02 million tokens were dumped, the reserve hole on the exchange's account has been fully exposed.
ETH in the same wallet has long been available for withdrawal, but UNI is stuck and can't be moved, clearly showing there is no spot inventory available.
The dumped tokens won't magically reappear; the exchange will have to go to the secondary market to buy them back to make up the shortfall. This obvious rigid buy order is holding down the market here, making it hard for the price not to rebound in the future.
#UNI
$UNI
👇#AMD数据中心收入近翻倍，营收及指引均超预期
AMD's Q3 results broadly exceeded expectations, yet the stock experienced a high open followed by a decline, initially rising 7.5% pre-market to $518 before quickly falling below the $500 mark. Under high valuation, the margin for error in performance is extremely tight.
Fundamental highlights are clear: total revenue reached $13.38 billion, up 45% year-over-year; adjusted EPS was $2.09, up 74% year-over-year, both surpassing market consensus. The core growth driver, the data center business, generated $8.55 billion in revenue, soaring 97% year-over-year and accounting for nearly 64% of total revenue. The AI computing power growth attribute continues to materialize, further widening the fundamental divergence with Intel.
The decline trigger came from marginal flaws: Q4 gross margin guidance at 55%, slightly below the market expectation of 55.3%; to stockpile the next-generation Helios products, free cash flow plunged from $1.5 billion to $554 million. At the current high pricing of 125x PE, the market demands near-perfect earnings reports, and any detail falling short of expectations triggers concentrated profit-taking.
Significant sector divergence is evident, with storage-related stocks performing relatively strong, Qualcomm and Nvidia showing mediocre performance; Tesla-related stocks continue to be weak due to political risk drag.
$AMD $FIL's decentralized storage sector inherently has a unique narrative appeal, but upon closer examination, the tokenomics of this network still have many aspects worth considering. Filecoin has built an open decentralized storage trading market that connects global storage providers with users who need storage.
Whether it can sustain long-term success depends not just on the concept but on real-world implementation: whether there is continuously growing commercial paid demand, if data retrieval is stable and reliable, whether pricing can compete with centralized cloud storage, and at the same time maintain the motivation for all network participants to stay engaged long-term. Ultimately, the value of this infrastructure must be realized through genuine on-chain usage; relying solely on incentive subsidies is unlikely to support lasting value.
⚠️ This is only a market perspective and does not constitute investment advice. 11.4 Pre-market: Blue Wave Sweeps, Initial Drop Then Rally, Crypto and Stocks Follow Same Script, Tonight's Data Sets the Tone
Election results landed harsher than expected — Democrats swept both chambers of Congress, flipping Texas and Kansas blue. But the market panicked only briefly: Asia markets first dropped then recovered, Nasdaq 100 futures rebounded from -2%, Bitcoin bounced from a low of 75,700 to above 78,000, all driven by the same logic — Trump still holds veto power, a divided government = policy gridlock = all bad news priced in. Now, US pre-market dips again, hardware stocks underwater, not due to fundamentals worsening but because the market switches back to the economic script: tonight's ADP + ISM, Friday's nonfarm payrolls, and four earnings reports all beating expectations just prove — AI demand is real, the drop was sentiment, not performance.
【This Election Game】 Senate at least 54 seats, 7 states flipped blue (Taralico first Democratic senator from Texas since 1988, Kansas first since 1932). House over 245 seats, Jeffries to become first Black House Speaker. The surprise was the Senate sweep, causing a few hours of panic, but "veto power = nothing gets done" is the most familiar script: Korean Composite Index reversed from -4% to positive, gold back above 4000, US Treasuries strengthened across the board. The biggest rally was in clean energy (Hanwha +22%, ENPH +7.8%, FSLR +9.4%) — this is the real trade theme of the Blue Wave.
【Why the Pre-market Dip Again】 ① Risk-off ahead of data: ADP/ISM coming tonight. ② AI regulatory shadow: tighter approvals + return controversies pressuring valuations, but Trump can veto AI regulation bills, strategists say this is an overreaction. ③ Individual heavyweight stock troubles: AAPL down consecutively (memory price hikes squeezing margins), TSLA -5%, SpaceX -7%. Meanwhile, the AI chain is actually diverging — all four earnings beat expectations.
【Four Earnings Reports: AI Demand Is Real】
AMD: $13.38B (+45%), data center $8.55B (+97%), Q4 guidance $17B, 2027 growth over 80%, after-hours up 9%.
SMCI: $19.9B (about 3x), full-year raised to $72-82B, after-hours +11%.
ALAB: $585M (+154%).
ANET: $3.66B (+58.5%), first 2027 guidance $18.5B, AI network doubled to $7B, after-hours +15%. INTC miss due to own supply chain issues, not industry demand.
【BTC/ETH: Crypto and Stocks Same Script, Drop Then Rally】 On election night BTC peaked near 78,000, then plunged to 75,700 (7-week low) after vote counting, rebounded this morning above 78,300 (+2,300 from low), ETH recovered from 2,260 to around 2,300.
Three logics: ① Result clarified within hours = uncertainty cleared.
② Divided government = crypto-friendly legislation blocked, but aggressive bad legislation also stalled, market loves gridlock.
③ Oversold + options bottom fishing (election date options traded $660M, $420M calls).
Headwinds: BTC down 41% from October highs, ETF outflows continue (year-to-date -$1.84B), after Binance hack last week ETF net outflow $884M, Democratic sweep shadows "Clear Act" legislation, anti-crypto Senator Brown from Ohio returns, legislation in January tougher.
【Tonight's Outlook】 BTC support at 76,800 (50-week MA)/76,000, resistance 78,000-79,000. If Nasdaq stabilizes at 22:30 US open, BTC follows up; weak data means both fall. Only above 78,000 bulls win, below 77,000 reduce risk. ETH tracks BTC, 2,300 key, above that target 2,400, below 2,250 turns weak.
【AI Chain Segment Strategy】 Tone: Regulatory shadow ≠ fundamental damage, earnings king, pick validated names, avoid high leverage.
① Storage (MU/SNDK/Western Digital/SK Hynix/Samsung): price hike logic independent of election, most resistant to regulation. Apple said memory price hikes squeeze margins = strong demand, insufficient supply. Asia session Samsung/SK Hynix down only 1%, pricing power intact. Pullback is opportunity (not this week).
② Chips (AMD/AVGO/NVDA/INTC/MRVL): only trust earnings-validated. AMD nailed AI chip demand, INTC's problem is internal. MRVL down 12% due to LITE merger, waiting for completion.
③ Optical comms (COHR/LITE/AAOI): network demand validated by ANET, avoid pair undergoing integration.
④ Equipment (AMAT/LRCX/KLA/Teradyne): semiconductor equipment beta, trade swings not faith.
⑤ Cloud vendors (CRWV/ORCL/MSFT/GOOG): regulatory hotspot. CRWV over 10x leverage most vulnerable, Microsoft and Google self-build + diversified impact smaller, avoid short term.
⑥ Cybersecurity (PANW/CRWD): hidden election beneficiaries, tighter regulation → more security spending, CRWD pushes AI "kill switch" + acquired Fiddler AI, cybersecurity trio outperform hardware.
⑦ Counter trade: clean energy + gold are true election beneficiaries, AI chain funds rotate, watch the seesaw.
【Tonight's Data + Next Days】 ADP expected 69-75K (prior 90K): low = easing heats up, high = soft landing, ISM expected 54.8: watch price 74 and employment sub 50.1, after-hours Qualcomm + SEZL earnings. Thursday initial claims (expect 197K), Friday nonfarm = make or break: expect +59K, prior +29K, unemployment 4.2%.
Script: 50-150K and no spike in unemployment = soft landing supports earnings.
Another surprise miss = recession trade returns, hardware hit again, cybersecurity advantage clearer.
Big beat = high valuation growth stocks get hit first.
【Positions】 PANW: election slightly positive, catalyst 11/18 earnings, hold + wait. CRWD: best AI regulatory play, healthy above 225. SEZL: earnings tonight after market = first position event this week, watch ① revenue growth ② bad debt provisions ③ holiday season guidance, no add before earnings, stop loss if broken, otherwise hold.
$BTC $ETH $AMD $TSLA $ALAB Brothers, although the market is jumping up and down, remember one thing: Dr. Sun's place is not without food! No matter how bad this market is, as long as the direction is right, there will still be meat to eat.
Look at the current $ETH chart, Ethereum is hovering around 2317, and 82% of retail bulls are still rushing in crazily. That short position I entered at the high of 2354 is now comfortably holding a 4.63% profit. Why so stable? Because the 422 buy orders below are just bait, the 105 sell orders above are the real main force suppression. That 82% bulls are the meat we talk about!
The trend hasn't changed, keep holding the short position steadily. No matter how the market tosses and turns
$ZEC $BTC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Brothers, has gold taken off as expected on this long-term run? $XAU
When it previously broke down, it scared everyone, but I said early on that was just a shakeout, the foundation is still there, letting everyone accumulate in batches at low levels. Feeling good now, right!
From 3870 straight up to breaking 4051, the logic of safe-haven demand and central bank gold purchases has fully played out. Those who held without selling are enjoying big gains today!
However, there will be resistance around 4050 in the short term, so some consolidation and shakeout is needed. Everyone should take profits in batches first, pocket some cash to feel secure, and keep stop-losses on the rest. We'll continue to wait for 4180. The long run is a marathon, don’t rush to sprint. For those who haven’t gotten on board yet, don’t stubbornly chase the highs—wait for a pullback! $BTC $ZEC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #AMDQ3DataCenterUp97%
$SOL is trading around $92.99 after dropping from the $103–$104 zone. Buyers recently defended the $89.89 support, pushing price back toward $93. Now, all eyes are on $94.62. A breakout above this level and the descending trendline could open the way toward $97.11 and $100.38
My DCA approach is to accumulate gradually around $92–$93, with additional entries near $90.50 and $89.90. No need to rush!
Entry: $92–$93
TP1: $94.62
TP2: $97.11
TP3: $100.38
SL: $89.50. TeraWulf secures Google credit support, endorsing the Justified data center campus in Hawesville, Kentucky, corresponding to a long-term lease commitment of approximately $19 billion with Anthropic.
Google provides contractual credit support for the anticipated debt financing, with Alphabet's senior unsecured debt currently rated AA+ by S&P and Aa2 by Moody's. The project is expected to begin phased delivery by the end of 2027, continuing through the second quarter of 2028. Source: PANews.
Two points to observe: whether Google's credit support can translate into low-cost debt financing; and the actual delivery and payment schedule of Anthropic's lease. If financing is secured and installation proceeds on schedule, WULF's valuation flexibility will open up; however, construction period or tenant risks could amplify volatility. The involved stock is WULF, with a bullish bias, but it is a U.S. stock rather than a crypto-native asset, so it does not directly catalyze prices of mainstream coins like BTC, but rather reflects cross-market sentiment in computing power.
Are you more focused on the financing being secured or the delivery schedule? $DOGE For Dogecoin, the community itself is its most precious moat. It well demonstrates one thing: internet meme culture and spontaneous community resonance among ordinary people can continuously bring traffic and popularity to the asset.
But popularity is ultimately just a bonus and cannot replace fundamentals. Even with the most active community on the entire network, relying solely on sentiment and consensus still makes it difficult to sustain a long-term stable trend. When trading DOGE, understanding market sentiment and reading collective behavior is far more important than simply betting on "faith". 🚨 BITCOIN IS RECOVERING… BUT IS THIS THE REAL BREAKOUT?
$BTC is back above $78K after dipping below $76K. 📈
ETF outflows are slowing, but bulls still need to prove their strength.
🎯 $80K is the key resistance to watch.
No FOMO. Wait for confirmation. Protect your capital!
Bullish breakout or another bull trap? 👀
#Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoMarket #Trading
#DailyOrbit #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49%
Circle's Q3 earnings exceeded expectations: total revenue and reserve interest income combined reached $865 million, a 17% year-over-year increase; adjusted EBITDA hit $317 million, soaring 85% year-over-year, significantly enhancing profitability.
USDC ecosystem shows structural growth: average circulation was $73.3 billion, up only 8% year-over-year, but on-chain transaction volume surged 49% to $13.9 trillion, accounting for 79% of the total stablecoin market transactions, up 13 percentage points from last year. Quarterly minting and redemption totaled a record $208 billion, with an average daily turnover of about $2.3 billion, confirming that USDC is shifting from a yield-bearing holding tool to a high-frequency medium for payments, settlements, and DeFi.
New business accelerates simultaneously: Over 100 institutions have built applications on the Arc mainnet; CPN payment's annualized transaction volume surged 15 times year-over-year, currently exceeding $58 billion; over 99% of x402 proxy payments are settled in USDC.
It should be noted that revenue still heavily depends on U.S. Treasury interest; if entering a rate-cutting cycle, growth in scale alone may not fully offset the pressure from narrowing interest spreads. The long-term highlight lies in the GENIUS Act coming into effect, where compliant digital dollars will penetrate enterprise-level payments and global settlement infrastructure, potentially reshaping valuation logic.
$CRCL So far in this wave of rebound, we haven't seen any huge short-term chips rushing into Coinbase yet.
However..... just one hour ago, there was a transfer of 2200 BTC. I wonder if this counts as large?
Reposted from MurphyRecently, the overall crypto market has entered a period of high-level volatile consolidation. Bitcoin (BTC) has been repeatedly tugging between the range of 77,000 to 80,000 USD. At this critical psychological and technical level, the movement of institutional funds has become the core variable influencing market sentiment. Latest data shows the market is facing a dual challenge of "spot ETF fund outflows" and "slowing corporate treasury accumulation." Core data insight: ETF massive outflows and MicroStrategy's differentiated actions According to SoSoValue data monitoring, the US spot BTC ETF experienced a cumulative net outflow of approximately 1.042 billion USD during October 30 and November 2, with total net assets subsequently falling to about 98.1 billion USD. This phenomenon reflects that under macro expectation adjustments or profit-taking at high levels, some traditional funds have chosen to withdraw temporarily. Meanwhile, as an important "buyer" in the market, corporate treasuries are still accumulating but the scale of coin purchases has been significantly limited. Specifically: · Strategy (MicroStrategy): Last week, it spent 65.5 million USD to increase holdings by 811 BTC. However, it is worth noting that during the same period, it repurchased about 208 million USD of preferred stock. This action indicates that MicroStrategy is adjusting its capital structure, maintaining its BTC base holdings while allocating some funds to support the company's own stock price and balance sheet, rather than recklessly going "all-in" on Bitcoin.Is the current $ETH market a bull trap or a real reversal?
In short: After bottoming at 2172, the bulls are climbing step by step — look at the lows at the bottom, each one higher than the last, this is an ascending channel, this is buyer control. The price just surged to a high of 2338, many are starting to get weak in the knees, asking: can 2300 hold?
From on-chain funds perspective, capital is continuously flowing in, the main force's intention is clear: to shake out the unsteady retail investors with volatility. Now as long as 2300 holds effectively, there is a lot of room above!
Current price is 2310, although bullish, do not chase the highs directly to avoid short-term shakeout losses. A prudent approach is to wait for a pullback to the 2295–2305 range (around the 2300 whole number level, which is a repeatedly confirmed step support), stop loss at 2280, target 2340–2380.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Mainstream coins are still consolidating, but privacy coins are surprisingly holding up well this round
This morning when I checked the market, BTC dipped to around 75,600 at its lowest, then rebounded to about 77,800. ETH hovered near 2,270, and SOL was at 92. There was no dramatic crash, yet there was hardly any decent sustained buying.
In contrast, ZEC and XMR have been relatively resilient during this correction, even showing some rebounds. The market isn’t completely out of funds; rather, risk appetite is diverging—some capital prefers to hedge or follow anti-censorship narratives instead of continuing to leverage mainstream coins.
With the Democrats taking both chambers, regulatory expectations have intensified, making privacy coin narratives easier to revive. But such divergence usually doesn’t last long; either funds flow back to mainstream coins or the overall market continues to face pressure.
One pitfall is mistaking short-term resilience for an independent trend. Privacy coins are more volatile and less liquid, so rebounds come easily but pullbacks hurt just as much.
What’s your current view on privacy coins?
Do you hold ZEC or XMR? With mainstream coins consolidating and privacy coins relatively resilient, are you holding on, adding more, or have you already reduced your position? Share your reasoning.
$ZEC $XMR $BTC #PrivacyCoins #MidtermElections #CryptoMarket