Orbit Post Sitemap
US Midterm Elections vs $BTC
Look at the historical rhythm:
Midterm Years (Drawdowns):
🔴 2014: -57%
🔴 2018: -73%
🔴 2022: -64%
The Year After (Recoveries):
🟢 2015: +34%
🟢 2019: +92%
🟢 2023: +155%
2026 is a midterm year. We are currently in that period of political uncertainty and price drawdown.
But if history rhymes, the real explosive leg up comes *after* the elections when the political fog clears. The four-year halving cycle overlaps perfectly with this political cycleOn the same morning, Asian stock markets were split in two. The Hong Kong Hang Seng Tech Index surged 2.85%, led by AI hardware, semiconductors, and optical communications; meanwhile, the Singapore Strait Index hit its lowest point since July, and despite explosive export data from South Korea, the Korean won weakened as foreign capital withdrew from the stock market.
Don't be fooled by the red and green of a single market. When some rise 3% and others hit new lows in one day, it means money isn't leaving the market but moving within Asia—from places drained by foreign capital to sectors like AI hardware that still have stories to tell.
Watching the market means not just focusing on index ups and downs but tracking capital flows. Where money moves in, the story isn't over; where money is pulled out, even strong fundamentals can't withstand the selling pressure. Following where the money goes is far more useful than just watching which index rises or falls. Conclusion first: $TRUMP rose from 1.589 to a high of 1.777 in the past 24 hours, now at 1.701, up 7.1%. But what should be focused on is not the increase, but three numbers.
① At 22:00 on 11-01, the 1H trading volume was 40.34 million USD, 25.8 times that of the previous hour, with the price surging from 1.617 to 1.777.
② Open interest simultaneously rose from 14.44 million USD to 17.84 million, up 23.5%. When the price rose, people really added positions, not just shorts covering.
③ The funding rate stayed at the floor price of 0.005% for 9 consecutive periods, with the perpetual premium at zero—there was no short squeeze premium; longs were buying piece by piece.
Money bag: OKX perpetual 24-hour trading volume was 178 million USD, 4.2 times the spot volume of 42.6 million; the top 20 perpetual buy orders totaled 1.5 million USD, while spot only had 300,000. Perpetual contracts have less slippage, but spikes and funding fees all remain on the perpetual side.
The background is the US midterm elections on November 3: the crypto industry spent 200 million USD on votes, and the CLARITY Act’s chance of passing is close to zero due to a Senate setback. The rise is a political expectation premium, not on-chain data. I haven’t found any specific announcement explaining this wave, so don’t take 1.777 as an anchor.
For this election week wave, is 1.777 the top or just the first stage? $TRUMP🔥The pressure on BTC may not be over yet! What makes this drop worth watching is that gold and US stocks are also under pressure simultaneously, so the risk is not just coming from within the crypto space.
📉 On November 2nd, my BTC trading bias remains bearish. Around 78500 is a key observation zone; if the price rebounds to this level but fails to hold firmly and shows clear signs of weakening, I will consider looking for short opportunities. My overall downward view for this week remains unchanged for now, with continued attention on 72000 below.
🌍 Why do I remain cautious? Because market risk appetite is being affected by multiple factors. Gold is weakening, US stocks are adjusting, and crypto assets can hardly stay completely unaffected. Once capital tends to reduce risk exposure, high-volatility assets are often hit harder.
🧠 However, shorting should not be based solely on directional judgment. 78500 is just an observation price, not an unconditional entry signal. If the price breaks through resistance strongly and holds, we must guard against the bearish view failing.
⚠️ What I value more is trading discipline: wait for confirmation on rebounds, set stop losses when entering, keep position sizes reasonable, avoid holding losing positions stubbornly, and don’t add blindly. 72000 is the current target expectation, not a guaranteed price to reach.
Brothers, do you think BTC still has rebound potential this week, or will the bearish trend continue to dominate? #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ In the first 10 hours after withdrawals resumed, Binance saw a net outflow of $3.64 billion. BTC rebounded over the weekend, and some community members said the incident was over and funds had returned.
I don't see it that way.
If even market makers pull their funds, the order book thins out — the depth for the same sell order will be completely different. When FTX collapsed in 2022, the market was dealing with more than just the exchange's own problems; it was a chain reaction after liquidity collectively withdrew. The nature is different, but the thinning of the order book happened back then.
Withdrawal data is still changing. For the past couple of days, I’m treating the market as if it’s recovering. If withdrawals stabilize, order book depth returns, and ETF funds flow back in, I will revise my judgment.On Tuesday, the Reserve Bank of Australia meets. Among 32 economists, 31 bet on a rate hike, with only one from Deutsche Bank betting on a pause. Last week, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand unexpectedly did not raise rates.
This kind of situation is exactly the scenario I like. When a result is priced in 100% by the market, guessing the right direction hardly makes money—if rates rise, it just confirms expectations and prices remain unchanged; but if rates don’t rise, the Australian dollar and short-term bonds immediately reprice, and the odds pay out several times over.
Trading and playing cards follow the same principle: when everyone bets on one side, the real value lies on the opposite side. It’s not about betting on the underdog, but learning to place heavy bets only when the odds are severely asymmetric, and otherwise holding back. Low frequency, big bets, waiting for asymmetry—these three are what allow you to survive long-term, not guessing daily price ups and downs.The whole screen is teaching you to use Middle East headlines as a hedge, but let me show you some data that no one is watching: Tokyo's electricity price just hit a new high since September 2022, and the LNG spot price has risen to 34 USD per million BTU, more than three times the pre-war level.
This is the real transmission path of the Middle East chess game. Oil and gas prices are at high levels, first pushing inflation, then keeping yields in various countries from falling, and finally hitting risk assets together. Mitsubishi UFJ said it very plainly today: the rise in US yields combined with high oil prices will continue to pressure emerging market currencies and assets.
So stop treating the war as a bullish factor and blindly buying hedges. The real pricing is—this is a conflict being traded as if it were a rate hike. Gold has fallen along with it these past two days, which is the best reminder: the hedge narrative is invalid in this game.🔥 On November 2nd, BTC rebounded to around 78,500, but I still prefer to look for shorting opportunities! The overall approach this week remains unchanged: do not easily change the bearish plan until the trend reverses.
📉 My judgment is that this round of decline is not just a problem within the crypto space. Gold has recently been under clear pressure, the US stock market has also experienced adjustments, and global risk assets are all under stress. When the whole nest is in trouble, no egg can remain intact. When overall market risk appetite declines, it's not easy for the crypto market to stay unaffected.
🎯 If BTC rebounds to around 78,500, I will focus on observing whether there are signs of stagnation, volume resistance, or a pullback after a spike, then consider setting up short positions. Without confirmed signals, do not blindly chase shorts; if the price effectively holds above key resistance levels, also adjust the strategy in time.
⚠️ The current bearish target still focuses on 72,000, but the target does not mean it will definitely be reached. The most important thing in trading is not to guess right every time, but to control position size, set stop losses, avoid holding losing positions, and not stubbornly resist.
Brothers, do you think BTC will first rebound to 78,500 today, or will it continue directly toward 72,000? #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ $AKE dropped 30%, I switched back to the group chat, I almost want to slap my own thigh blue!
【Hardcore review of this "missed the meat grinder" wave】:
Looking at the screenshots in the group, at 00:06 AM, big brother @熠光 openly said: "ake can still be shorted, you go with a small position to take a taste." What did I reply at that time? "Dare not, too thrilling... I want to hold it, it will rise tomorrow, otherwise I can't sleep."
Now look, with AKE's chart today, I can't sleep, and I'm even scrambling for rooftop space!
Look at this 1-hour chart, plunging from 0.03209 all the way down to 0.00585, today it crashed another -30.97%! All moving averages are in a waterfall-like bearish alignment, bottomless. Looking at the data in chart 2, my scalp tingles: the funding rate has already dropped to an extreme negative value of -0.443%, yet the long position ratio is still as high as 73.69%! Retail investors are crazily catching falling knives halfway down the mountain, and the manipulators seeing this full screen of longs, how could they stop without slaughtering you?
Macro logic: In a weak market with tight liquidity, new coins are just ATMs for manipulators, there is simply no bottom.
My advice: Use the most cautious instinct to miss the fattest crash. Since it has already fallen this far, don't bet on any "oversold rebound" bottom fishing now; going long here is just delivering takeout to the manipulators. If you haven't entered short positions, just watch the show honestly, wait for the rebound near the moving averages before shorting on the right side.BTC, ETH, ZEC Liquidation Pain Points｜The Long-Short Double Kill Range Is Already Set 📊
After a wave of rally, it quickly weakened and pulled back. The core reason is that the price touched the upper short pain point range, where short selling pressure is concentrated and released.
Several coins surged and hit the dense short positions, bulls lacked strength to support, and the market directly turned down.
📊 24h Liquidation Pain Points:
$BTC Current price 78613
Short pain point 78904 (+0.37%), Long pain point 77242 (-1.78%)
The upper short pain point is very close; a slight pull can trigger the liquidation zone; the lower long pain point has more space. BTC can easily spike down to shake out shorts before turning down to sweep longs.
$ETH Current price 2308
Short pain point 2319 (+0.50%), Long pain point 2268 (-1.73%)
Close to BTC’s rhythm, upper resistance is just a step away, limited upper space, mainly oscillating and tugging.
$ZEC Current price 1280
Short pain point 1301 (+1.57%), Long pain point 1206 (-6.17%)
Focus on ZEC! The upper short pain point is not far; moving up can trigger short liquidation; the lower long pain point has ample space. Once broken, many longs below are waiting to be harvested. Approaching NU7 upgrade, elasticity far exceeds mainstream.
In comparison: BTC and ETH have close upper short pressure, limited upward space, oscillation and repetition are the main theme.
ZEC still has a small upper short sweep space, but the "slaughterhouse" space for longs below is larger, intensifying the long-short battle.AI, the toughest target in this round, is starting to soften. OpenAI has slashed its current round financing target by $10 billion at once, with its valuation adjusted down to 1.25 trillion. Note, this is the primary market, the most sought-after card, discounting itself.
Many people still treat the recent drop as a correction, thinking to buy in after a deep fall. I've always said this is deleveraging, not a correction. The evidence is here: it's not a secondary market sentiment crash, but even the pricing on the financing side is retracting. The demand is real; AI inference calls have increased a thousandfold in a year, but demand never truly equals reasonable pricing.
Bubbles never burst starting from the worst assets; they begin to loosen from the most expensive and most believed ones. As a risk asset shadow, $BTC shouldn't be expected to remain unaffected at times like this. The small position I hold is waiting for the right spot, not bottom fishing. Seeing 81% really got me excited for a moment, thinking Solana's total network hashrate was finally going to be cut by eighty percent.
But reading further, the 81% is what p-ATA saved for itself, which only leaves 10%-11% for the entire network. That's almost eight times less.
Alright, so ATA really has such little presence in the whole chain. Yet every newcomer entering SOL has to set this up first; the most inconspicuous part actually has the most profit. And the proposal was just merged, still under review, and the program hasn't been deployed. Let's not take this as a bullish sign just yet.Apple will release its earnings report after the U.S. market closes on November 2nd. This report is somewhat different from previous ones, with several key variables intertwined, so expectations and reality need to be carefully separated and analyzed. The current market consensus expects revenue around $113.3 billion and EPS about $1.98. The first core contradiction is the modeling distortion caused by the staggered launch of the iPhone. Bank of America has already warned that the launch schedulThe Financial Truth Behind the Surge in $SPCX AI Revenue
The most important numbers to study about SPCX are not just the revenue growth of the AI business, but the profit structure behind that revenue.
According to data cited from the third quarter of 2026 in the previous analysis, AI-related business revenue reached about $7.56 billion, but the operating profit margin was only about 5.7%.
What does this mean?
A large revenue scale does not necessarily mean equally substantial final profits.
What deserves more attention is that AI data centers need to continuously purchase or lease GPUs, build facilities, ensure power supply, and also bear equipment depreciation and financing costs.
If capital investment grows alongside revenue, investors ultimately need to answer one question:
How much long-term cash flow can these expensive computing devices actually generate?
I believe the market should truly focus on three indicators going forward:
First, whether AI revenue can continue to grow.
Second, whether the operating profit margin of the AI business can improve.
Third, whether free cash flow can gradually turn positive.
If all three indicators improve simultaneously, SPCX's investment logic will become increasingly solid.
Otherwise, no matter how astonishing the growth rate is, it may just be a superficial prosperity of capital-intensive expansion.
Remember this: revenue determines how big the story is, profit margin determines how good the story is, and cash flow determines how far the story can go.
#SPCX #FinancialReportAnalysis #马斯克称AI将占SpaceX价值99% Solana has merged another proposal, SIMD-0567. The eye-catching figure is 81%, but what's really interesting is the 10%-11% next to it.
The 81% refers to the average reduction in compute unit consumption of the new p-ATA program compared to the existing program. The 10%-11% is the proportion of savings across the entire network due to this replacement. The difference of seven to eight times between the two numbers indicates that ATA-type operations account for less than 15% of Solana's total network CU.
Mechanically, p-ATA is rewritten based on Pinocchio and maintains instruction interface compatibility. Since the interface remains unchanged, wallets, DEXs, and aggregators don't need to modify their code; the upgrade is transparent to upper layers. Compute units are Solana's block budget; saving CU means more transactions can fit in the same block, or the same batch of transactions is less likely to fail due to insufficient budget.
However, the proposal has only reached merging and is still under review; merging does not mean the program has been deployed. So this does not constitute a trading reason to price in $SOL's benefits prematurely; the timing is a bit early. Its real meaning is that Solana is still meticulously cutting costs operation by operation. These kinds of efforts lack stories and don't make headlines, but this is how the lifeline of high concurrency is sustained.
One last point: why optimize ATA instead of a hotter sector? Because it is a necessary step for every new user entering the network, the most inconspicuous pipeline on the entire chain. Saving 81% in the most inconspicuous place, multiplied by the network's volume, only yields that 10%.The $USDT decrease of $3 billion in one week is the detail I care about most in this news. I usually first consider it in terms of the opportunity cost of dollar funds: whether money is willing to stay on-chain also involves trade-offs between interest rates and risk preferences. Data from DefiLlama simultaneously shows that the total supply of dollar stablecoins has declined both daily and weekly, and USDC has also decreased weekly.
My judgment is that this is somewhat bearish for markets relying on new dollar inflows, but it is not enough to prove that the market is undergoing a full-scale withdrawal. The circulating supply of stablecoins represents the scale of the capital vehicle, not orders ready to take positions at any moment; this contraction cannot be attributed solely to a single macro factor based on numbers alone.
My speculation is that if dollar interest rates remain attractive but on-chain opportunities are insufficient, the willingness to hold stablecoins may decline, and new risk positions will be more cautious; if macro financing conditions loosen, then the same contraction may not constrain the market as long. The key is why the funds are leaving, not just how much.
Therefore, I tend to treat this news as a warning about the willingness of dollar funds, not as a judgment on price direction. Rather than immediately labeling the market, I prefer to wait to see if macro conditions and stablecoin supply mutually confirm each other. Facing this contraction, what are people most concerned about now: dollar interest rates, dollar strength, or overall risk appetite? ETH rose about 8% from noon yesterday to noon today. The long-short ratio of OKEx ETH perpetual contracts actually dropped from 2.35 to 1.96, which hasn't been this low in the past week on an hourly basis.
The contracts haven't been idle either; open interest has increased by nearly 20,000 contracts in just over a day, from 651,000 to 671,000.
At first, I thought the price rise was driven by more longs entering. But it doesn't match up—the higher the price goes, the more accounts open shorts. The crowd is actually positioning against the price rise. The funding fee settlement this morning only slightly favored longs, so shorts basically hold without cost, and no one is in a hurry to exit.
If I had said yesterday that the ratio would be back above 2.6 by 11 AM today, I would have been wrong. Instead, it stayed at 1.96.
Don't just look at the long-short ratio alone; compare it with the price. When the price rises but the ratio falls, it means a group is opening shorts against the trend. If you're on that side, at least you know you're crowded with many others. If by this time tomorrow the ratio returns above 2.35, it means this group dispersed overnight, and I'll change my view then. I thought of a gym joke: The coach said training legs helps you walk more steadily, and I said if you run with fifteen weight plates tied on, wouldn't you be as steady as a high-speed train? After laughing, I realized that adding weight and increasing odds are really not the same thing 😂
Core Trader 14 is going long $ETH this time with 15x leverage, holding 111 coins, with a notional value of about $254,500. My judgment is: this is a long position very picky about the price path, and it can't be directly translated as a "strong bullish signal."
Roughly calculating with 15x leverage, if the price moves 1% against the position, the loss relative to the initial margin is about 15%, not counting fees and margin adjustments; so even if the final direction is correct, interim drawdowns could disrupt the plan. The material doesn't provide stop-loss or other positions, so judging by the amount alone, it's impossible to tell if this is an independent bet or part of a portfolio. I'll keep watching how the position is managed—don't treat the number of weight plates as a health check report.$PLTR I believe Palantir's earnings report after the market closes on Monday will be the first catalyst for this rebound. The company's own guidance already indicates that growth is still accelerating.
Palantir's revenue guidance for Q3 is $2.16 billion, which at the midpoint is 83% higher than last year's $1.181 billion for the same period; Q2 revenue was $1.935 billion, a 93% year-over-year increase. More importantly, the profit: the adjusted operating profit guidance is between $1.292 billion and $1.296 billion, meaning that for every $100 of revenue, nearly $60 turns into operating profit. The market consensus for earnings per share is $0.33, compared to $0.18 in the same period last year. $PLTR
Regarding the stock price, $PLTR fell 6.3% on 10/30, closing at $184.11, about 12% below the 52-week high of $209.05. The entire month of October saw only a 1.6% decline. Compared to the broader market's drop in October, PLTR was passively dragged down by the market; the company's fundamentals themselves have no risk factors. However, it is important to note that the market is no longer focusing on earnings expectations but is instead paying more attention to next quarter's guidance. If the Q4 guidance falls short of market expectations, it will be necessary to watch whether this is due to a slowdown in government and enterprise orders.$TRUMP
TRUMP rose 7.8% in the past 24 hours, with contract trading volume of $178 million.
Sounds lively. But its open interest is only 17.54 million. Trading $178 million on an open interest of 17.5 million means a tenfold turnover. This structure isn’t about someone building a position; it’s the same batch of money going back and forth, making a run and then stopping.
You can also see it on the chart: it dropped right after touching 1.777, now at 1.713, more than three points below the high. The funding rate is still neutral, not even building up a premium for longs.
The last time I chased this kind of high-turnover meme was entering on the second candlestick after a surge, and I got cut halfway up the mountain. This time it looks like no movement.
Meme money comes fast and leaves even faster. If I were to participate, I’d rather wait for the 1.7 level to be confirmed several times.
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ $SOL
This morning, one address closed out its short position on SOL, making a paper profit of $20.92 million.
What's interesting is the timing. Last week, the SOL spot ETF saw a net outflow of $71.47 million, a historical high. Normally, such a figure would signal a sell-off, but SOL is now at 95.4, down only 0.16% in 24 hours, with a low touching just 93.
I have a simple rule for trading: when the direction of money flow and price movement don't align, trust the price first. ETFs are withdrawing, shorts are fleeing, but the price hasn't collapsed, which means someone is absorbing the selling. I don't know who is absorbing, but with $20.92 million on the table, the shorts have already voted with real money.
My account has been empty these past two days; I haven't followed the move. If I were to follow, I'd wait for it to hold the low at 93 first.
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ $SOL $SOL This afro and big brother $BTC and second brother $ETH are basically cut from the same mold, all stubbornly holding at resistance levels.
【Hardcore review of this "bull trap"】：
Looking at the 1-hour chart, SOL dropped from 103.83 all the way down to 92.26. Although it was forcibly pulled up to 95.54 now, the MA60 overhead (95.35) is pressing down like a steel plate. MACD has a golden cross below zero, but the red bars clearly lack volume. The overhead trapped positions are extremely heavy, bearing great pressure.
Unique insight here: Looking at the data in chart 3, I get chills. The proportion of long accounts has actually surged to 76.71%! The long-short ratio is 3.29! Under negative funding rates, retail investors are crazily going long. The whale seeing this screen full of long orders definitely won’t act as a good Samaritan to push prices up; a bearish candle could come down anytime to shake out positions.
Macro logic: Tightening liquidity in the big environment, BTC leading the consolidation, and insufficient funds in the market to push SOL through multiple resistances.
My advice: Don’t be fooled by the 15-minute rebound. The overhead pressure is too heavy + retail investors are extremely crowded. Chasing longs here is basically delivering takeout. Try light short positions near resistance (around 96), or just stay flat and watch. Wait until this batch of stubborn bulls gets washed out before making moves.My first reaction to this was: don't directly translate "net outflow" as bearish. SoSoValue data shows that from October 26 to 30 Eastern Time, the HYPE spot ETF had a net outflow of $595,000, but the historical cumulative net inflow is still $303 million.
If I were to write this as a strategy, I would set an observation rule: if there is a weekly net outflow and the fund direction across different products tends to be consistent, then increase vigilance for weakening $HYPE liquidity; otherwise, just note it as divergence and do not directly conclude a trend. 🤖
This time, I tend to see it as a weak signal, but not a full retreat yet: THYP had a net outflow of $913,400, while BHYP had a net inflow of $595,900. The aggregate number is negative, but the products are not moving in the same direction. Looking only at the headline can easily lead to interpreting partial redemptions as a disappearance of overall demand.
The advantage of this rule is that it forces me to look at both total volume and distribution, reducing the chance of being misled by a single negative sign. The flaw is obvious: weekly data can mask changes during the period, and cumulative net inflow is only historical and cannot be used to prove subsequent support. If outflows continue and cover more products, I will increase the weight of this signal; this is my reasoning.
As a quant newbie, I'm still struggling with the filtering conditions: do you value the persistence of continuous net outflows more, or whether different products are flowing out synchronously? If you were to write this rule yourself, how would you set it? It's almost noon, close to twelve. I glanced at the market and noticed that BTC and ETH secretly surged at noon. I guess many brothers threw down their chopsticks, slapped their thighs, and rushed in chasing the highs again. Stop right there! Watching the rising candlesticks feels great, but if we focus on the contract data, retail investors have already quietly started a mass exodus below!
First, look at $BTC, current price 78595, 4-hour long-short ratio 2.35. Although the bulls still dominate, it has clearly dropped from the high this morning. The area from 79000 to 80000 is full of trapped positions and short sellers lying in ambush. Chasing highs now is purely being used as stepping stones by the main players.
The most interesting is $ETH, current price 2306. This surge caused ETH's long-short ratio to crash from 3.44 this morning down to 1.88! The price went up, but bulls are frantically closing positions and running! This shows retail investors are scared of being trapped; they quickly take profits at the slightest pullback. This structure means heavy selling pressure above, so don't get carried away.
Next, $SOL, current price 95.5, is the most stubborn of all. The long-short ratio stubbornly stays high at 3.54! The open interest hasn't dropped at all; it's a bunch of bulls refusing to give up fighting to the end. With this layered leverage, if the big players don't drop a deep bomb to shake the market, it wouldn't do justice to these numbers.
To sum up, don't get blinded by this noon surge. The bulls themselves are quietly fleeing. Watch more, act less, and don't catch the falling knife.
What did everyone have for lunch today? With this surge, did you get a piece of the meat, or are you stuck halfway up the mountain again?
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ I am bearish on this rebound, but the number in the previous post needs to be corrected.
Yesterday I said I would give up if the 1-hour close stood above 78,500. Today at 11 o'clock, the close was 78,619.9.
I was wrong about that level; the 78,251 top is invalid.
First, look at the funding rate. BTC is currently 0.00629%, which is 62.9% of the benchmark 0.01%.
The perpetual contract is still at a discount, premium −0.0509%. Leverage hasn't increased, price rises first.
Liquidations have reversed direction. In the last 24 hours, the whole network had 160 million, longs and shorts almost evenly split.
But in the 1-hour window, shorts account for 91.5%, and in 4 hours 85.0%. The squeezed side is shorts, not longs.
The market clearing shorts and small coins clearing longs theory still holds today. XPL liquidations were 25.02 million, with longs accounting for 99.0%. Price dropped from 0.0838 to 0.0713.
Macro is the only new variable. News of a two-day plan from US-Iran talks caused oil prices to plunge and gold to return to $3,900.
But the ETF moved inversely, BTC ETF daily net value −209 million.
Judgment: 78,800 will not hold today. Most likely it will pull back near 78,300 before 16:00.
If the 1-hour close stands above 78,800, this judgment is invalid. I won't chase nor guess the top.
This is just my personal review and does not constitute investment advice.
$BTC $ETH #US stocks and gold & silver fall sharply in sync, risk-off funds flow diverges I always thought buying GPUs was something wealthy companies paid for themselves, but it turns out NAVER this time borrowed as a consortium from banks.
Brookfield led it, with KB Kookmin Bank as the lead arranger, $8 billion, 10.7 trillion KRW, to buy chips and then lease them long-term to their own cloud.
In simple terms: they don’t buy the chips themselves, they rent them, and the banks provide the money.
This model has been running for decades in power plants and shipping, and now it’s moved to GPUs.
So, the $TAO computing power narrative we watch daily—shouldn’t it also be accounted for as rent? Thinking about it, it’s quite a twist.$ATOM
Interoperability is one of crypto’s most important infrastructure challenges, and Cosmos has spent years developing around this idea. However, a strong technology vision does not automatically translate into value for ATOM holders. The important distinction is between growth across the Cosmos ecosystem and actual economic demand for the ATOM token. That relationship deserves serious attention.An $8 billion syndicated loan, with the borrower being South Korean tech giant NAVER, intended for purchasing artificial intelligence chips. The lead arranger is Brookfield, with KB Kookmin Bank as the lead arranger.
Let's clarify the numbers. The loan is 10.7 trillion KRW, part of a total 12.6 trillion KRW financing plan, directed towards AI computing infrastructure including GPUs, with the chips leased long-term to NAVER Cloud.
What’s worth pondering is not the amount, but the structure. GPU procurement used to be capital expenditure, paid in cash or by issuing shares or bonds; this time it’s a syndicated loan plus long-term leasing, a model typically used for power plants and data centers. The lenders’ willingness to accept this indicates they now regard GPUs as assets capable of generating stable cash flow, serving as collateral, and depreciating annually.
Once computing power is priced this way, the foundation of the AI narrative changes. Previously, valuations for $TAO and $RENDER relied on imagination; now traditional infrastructure capital calculates with leases and interest spreads, and this accounting will eventually be reflected on-chain. Protocols like $FET, which bet on AI infrastructure, will also be re-examined.
But syndicated loans have repayment schedules. GPUs depreciate quickly and iterate faster; the longer the lease, the greater the residual value risk for lenders. Brookfield dares to do this relying on NAVER Cloud’s business cash flow as a backstop; this is not a guaranteed profit from computing power, which most AI projects in crypto do not have.
One question remains: will the token’s peg be tied to the rental price per GPU hour? Macroeconomic expectations stir capital flows, sector rotation in the crypto market continues quietly
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？
#加密行业协同守护资产安全
Macroeconomic headwinds continue to deter institutional funds, but on-exchange capital has not completely laid flat; the rotation and competition among sectors is ongoing.
At the market level, spot ETF funds continue to flow out, and the market's bleeding pressure is visible to the naked eye. Previously, the Binance hack incident combined with unexpectedly high CPI data triggered large-scale capital withdrawals. The single-day net outflow of Bitcoin spot ETFs reached $643 million, marking the highest outflow since October. BTC intraday once dipped to $76,400, with total network liquidations exceeding $1.3 billion. Subsequently, only a weak recovery was seen around $78,000; ETH's trend weakened in sync, with the corresponding spot ETF experiencing five consecutive trading days of outflows.
The core suppressive logic behind this comes from interest rate expectations, as the market reprices the likelihood of rate hikes. U.S. Treasuries can offer risk-free returns above 5%, leading many institutions to temporarily avoid the crypto market's intense volatility.
Mainstream public chain camps show clear divergence, with NEAR becoming the brightest performer of the day.
$BTC, $ETH, and $SOL all face downward pressure, while only NEAR bucks the trend with nearly an 8% rise. This rally is driven by sector news stimulation and rotation of existing on-exchange funds, and does not imply a reversal of the overall market trend. SOL continues to weaken under market drag, with its related ETF funds also seeing five consecutive days of outflows.
Rather than rushing to chase these counter-trend assets, more patience is needed to wait for BTC spot buying to return. The focus next is on the November 6 employment report data, which will be a key node affecting market expectations.
$SOL#美联储官员密集发声，加息还要持续多久？ $BSB I'll be straightforward, this BSB order book is giving me a headache. Damn it! There's no movement outside, the order book is as thin as paper, the market manipulators are just staging a show, stabbing up and down like crazy, isn't this obviously a shakeout💀.
I've been watching the 0.0931 level for a long time, volume has shrunk to the extreme, it can't be pushed down, and the pull-ups are sluggish, a typical prelude to a big move. Such a quiet market often means the scythe is about to be raised.
I've entered spot first, stop loss set at 0.0890, if it breaks below, I'll accept the loss; target is first at 0.105, if it holds, then push higher. Don't chase the highs, wait for a pullback confirmation.
Follow or not, risk is on you.
👇👇👇Bitcoin investors have realized approximately $1.1 billion in losses, highlighting the pressure across the market. Interestingly, long-term holders have remained relatively calm, showing little movement in their positions. Most of this month's selling pressure appears to have come from recent buyers who entered at higher prices and chose to exit rather than wait for a recovery. This tells us something important: market corrections often reveal who has conviction and who is simply reacting to sho美联储官员释放的加息信号，正在给风险资产的风险偏好套上一层枷锁，而12月政策路径的分歧，让资金连方向都不敢下注。$BTC 反复试盘的本质正在于此：7.7万附近有人接，越靠近8万跑的人越多——上方清算区的记忆还刻在每个人心里，没人愿意当那个直冲的先锋。😤 这不是简单的观望，而是一场结构性的信心流失。$BTC 的每一次上探都伴随着卖压回吐，说明增量资金缺席，存量资金在互相博弈。真正的突破需要实打实的资金放量，而不是靠情绪硬推。眼下多数人的动作，与其说是看到了信号，不如说是怕错过——这种由恐惧驱动的入场，恰恰是最脆弱的筹码结构。 $ETH 的处境更能说明问题。2227一线卖压始终无法消化，新资金不断争夺存量份额，多头信心正在被一点点磨掉。当山寨与主流之间开始抢流动性，往往意味着市场进入了"谁都不敢重仓"的僵持阶段。这种犹豫，只有放量才能打破，而不是靠时间熬出来。 值得警惕的是，市场对12月加息预期的分歧被低估了。分歧本身不是方向，但它会放大波动——一旦某个数据或官员表态打破平衡，积压的仓位会集中释放。届时$BTC 的7.5万与$ETH 的2300，就是检验止损纪律的试金石。📉 我的判断是Suppose you invest $50,000 in $SPCX spot today. Can you become a millionaire in 10 years?
Let's do the math first:
Turning $50,000 into $1,000,000 requires a 20x return.
This means SpaceX must achieve an annualized compound return of about 34.9% over the next 10 years.
SpaceX indeed has several huge growth engines:
1. Starlink: Global satellite internet, continuously expanding user base and cash flow.
2. Starship: If it achieves low-cost, high-frequency launches, it will completely transform the aerospace industry.
3. AI infrastructure: Future space computing power may open new commercial opportunities.
4. Space economy: Satellite communications, space transportation, and orbital infrastructure.
But don't forget, SpaceX is already a highly valued company.
Even if it becomes a world-changing enterprise in the future, that doesn't mean buying in now will definitely yield 20x returns.
My view:
I still am optimistic about SpaceX's development over the next 10 years and even believe it could become one of the most important technology infrastructure companies of this era.
But investing is not a faith contest.
Great companies and great investments are two different things.
Are you willing to bet $50,000 on SpaceX's next 10 years? Most of the sell-offs happen during a gradual decline because the bottom-fishing funds are the real main buyers.
The market has no cost line; it won't stop selling just because prices look cheap now—they also need to take profits.
So once this cycle is clear, AI companies that haven't turned a profit yet are still at selling opportunities after every oversold rebound.
You have to wait for the next wave of sentiment recovery, combined with narratives to pull a non-profitable asset back to its original price, which is very difficult.
Therefore, believe that this AI wave is not over yet, and if you want to act, focus on cash flow giants to eliminate the risk of potential failure.
#AMD財報前瞻：Helios AI系統商業化進展 1. K Line
1) Weekly line connection: 4 consecutive weeks closed bearish. It can be seen that last week's high tested upward but was rejected at the opening of the week before last, then moved downward.
Currently, it is following a standard downtrend.
2) As of now, last week tested the main trading zone of consolidation from late August to mid-September, and has now retraced back to 783.
3) At this point: first watch for the weekly FVG 793 to be filled.
After filling, pay attention to the price reaction—whether it continues to test 82 upward or drops to seize 749.
2. Related Data
1) ETF:
BTC had a net outflow of about 202 million USD last week, after a net inflow of about 301 million USD the previous week. On 10/30, a single-day net outflow of about 643 million USD occurred, while IBIT still had a net inflow of about 177 million USD.
ETH had a net outflow of about 431 million USD, with two consecutive weeks of outflows; ETHA's outflow of about 391 million USD was the main driver.
Interpretation: The outflow was concentrated the day after the event, not a full-week withdrawal, so currently it is still a pullback.
2) Liquidations:
Last week totaled about 2.659 billion USD, with long positions about 1.987 billion USD and short positions about 672 million USD.
The two largest days: 10/29 long positions about 926 million USD, 10/30 long positions about 738 million USD. Mainly clearing long leverage.
3) Stablecoins:
Total market cap dropped from about 302.282 billion to about 297.794 billion, a decrease of about 4.488 billion (-1.48%). This is a reduction in circulation, not a burnI almost wanted to install a wallet on the calendar after reading this: at this rate, can you find the bottom by tearing to a certain page? Unfortunately, the calendar only turns pages, it doesn't turn itself over. 😂
Coin Bureau's analysis mentioned that Bitcoin's bottom in the past three cycles all occurred after the US midterm elections: 71 days after in 2014, 39 days after in 2018, and 13 days after in 2022; if this pattern repeats, the next window might be from the end of 2026 to early 2027. I think this kind of claim is more likely to create "front-running sentiment" and may not improve the accuracy of finding the bottom: the intervals are getting shorter, which easily tempts people to imagine the next one will be even earlier; and three samples don't prove that elections are the switch for the bottom.
My guess is, if everyone focuses on the same window, then expectation games might happen earlier, making it harder to wait for the bottom according to the schedule. Would you focus more on the expectation changes before the election, or the market reaction after? Should the calendar be equipped with a forward-looking mirror or a rearview mirror? Calculating, CeFi rose 0.30 percentage points more than BTC, which slightly dampens my excitement about it "leading the rally." When I see this kind of news, I usually first subtract the market's own gains before judging how strong the sector really is.
This information cites SoSoValue data: the CeFi sector rose 1.34% in 24 hours, BTC rose 1.04%, ETH rose 1.06%, while the AI sector fell 1.61%. I think this supports a "mild recovery," but it doesn't yet justify the conclusion that "the sector-wide rally has fully opened."
① CeFi rose 1.34%, with OKB up 2.72% and BNB up 1.56%. The sector is indeed stronger than BTC, but the lead is limited; we can't directly equate the strong performance of component coins with the strength of the entire sector.
② Layer1 rose 0.35%, PayFi rose 0.05%. Compared to BTC and ETH gains, these two sectors are lagging behind. I prefer to interpret this as the recovery not yet fully underway, rather than a broad-based strengthening.
③ AI fell 1.61%, DeFi fell 0.75%. This shows that within the same market trend, there are still pressured directions; "market recovery" cannot summarize the situation of assets held by ordinary users.
My judgment is that this news somewhat boosts market sentiment, but CeFi's relative advantage is not yet large enough for me to draw a trend conclusion. I will continue to watch whether it can consistently outperform BTC, rather than just remembering a single sector ranking.On Monday morning, did everyone see Bitcoin bounce a bit and start thinking about whether it's time to rush in and buy the dip? First, look at the order book data. Do you think those thousands or tens of thousands of buy orders at the bottom are there to support the price? Wake up, those are often traps set by manipulative traders!
$BTC current price 78337, order ratio 65 to 35, the buy side looks strong, especially around 76000 where there is a massive buy order of over ten million USD holding firm. But don't forget, right above at 78055 there's a sell wall. This tactic of placing huge buy orders below and setting resistance above is designed by the main players to stabilize your emotions, making you think the price won't fall further. Once retail investors rush in, they can cancel orders and dump the price in an instant.
Looking at $ETH now at 2274, buy orders ratio 59 to 41, with over seven million USD supporting at 2187 below, and a thick sell pressure wall at 2300 above. This kind of movement, with a strong ceiling above and a sponge below, means without big money coming in with real capital, dreaming of a V-shaped rebound is just wishful thinking.
Finally, $SOL at 94.4, after breaking below the 100 mark, now order ratio 57 to 43, with over four million USD defending at 93 below. But looking closely, sell orders start to appear near 94.15 above. In a downtrend, this level of buy orders is just a dying struggle. If the market shakes a bit, it will likely probe lower.
Summary: Order book placements and cancellations are just illusions by the main players. Liquidity is average on Monday morning, so don't blindly chase just because the buy orders below look thick.
At today's open, are you planning to buy the dip or wait for this wave of sentiment to release before making a move?
#FederalReserve officials signal rate hikes, December expectations still divided $AKE Don't rush to bottom-fish. That 33% flash crash spike wasn't an emotional sell-off; it was chips being directly dumped on the table.
The on-chain data is very clear: market makers transferred over $2.2 million worth of chips to Binance Alpha, instantly triggering selling pressure. More importantly, they still hold $800 million, about 54% of the circulating supply, so the sell-off is far from over. Retail investors see the drop and rush in to catch the dip, only to get buried batch after batch.
I don't guess the bottom, nor do I catch falling knives. I only wait for right-side signals: if the rebound lacks strength and a key support breaks, open a short at 0.01 with 20x leverage—this move yielded +750%.
For targets with such obvious dumping, direction matters more than courage. Going short with the trend is the only way to catch the wind. Don't ask where the bottom is; first see who is still selling. #AMD Earnings Preview: Progress in HeliosAI System Commercialization
Brothers, the AI computing power battle has changed its gameplay. The first half was about the computing power of a single GPU/XPU, but now Moore's Law is hitting a ceiling, and single-chip performance can't keep up. The second half is about system-level integration.
If you cram ten thousand top-tier chips into one data center, the bottlenecks immediately become: insufficient power, heat dissipation issues, and data transmission congestion. Jensen Huang keeps saying this is why liquid cooling, optical communication interconnects, and even power infrastructure have become new money printers. Nvidia is aggressively pushing liquid cooling, and Lumentum's optical module orders are booked through 2029—all working for the "system."
Linking this to the market, the logic for tech giants has shifted from "buying chips" to "building power plants," with capital expenditures becoming even larger. This is the underlying reason for the recent tech stock valuation cuts and the pressure on Bitcoin's price. $BTC $ETH $SOL When I see news about large holders changing direction, my first reaction is to put aside the market software and think about whether the total market funds have actually increased. From a macro perspective, reallocating existing funds and new funds entering the market are two different things; you can't mix them just because a single position is large.
According to Odaily monitoring, a certain address has liquidated its SOL short position, reducing about $23.61 million in position size, with a realized loss of about $240,000; at the same time, it opened a new long position of 12,500 $ZEC, with a position value of about $15.74 million. These are actions from the same account, but you can't assume the two funds correspond one-to-one.
My judgment is that this looks more like a local redistribution of risk appetite, not yet evidence of a market-wide shift. Removing shorts and increasing longs in another asset can change local buying and selling forces but does not prove that off-exchange liquidity is flowing in.
My speculation is: if US dollar liquidity improves and financing conditions ease, then such proactive risk-taking actions are more likely to spread into cross-coin market moves; if the funding environment does not cooperate, then large long positions may just be concentrated bets, and the sentiment transmission may not last. For ordinary users, distinguishing these two backgrounds is more useful than remembering addresses.
Therefore, I tend to treat this as a window to observe risk appetite rather than a macro turning point. To judge whether this ZEC long position can drive broader sentiment, what everyone cares about most now is the US dollar trend, interest rate expectations, or stablecoin net inflows?$AKE Don't rush to bottom-fish. That 33% flash crash spike wasn't an emotional sell-off; it was chips being directly dumped on the table.
The on-chain data is very clear: market makers transferred over $2.2 million worth of chips to Binance Alpha, instantly triggering selling pressure. More importantly, they still hold $800 million on-chain, about 54% of the circulating supply, so the unloading is far from over. Retail investors see the drop and rush in to catch the bottom, only to get buried batch after batch.
I don't guess the bottom, nor do I catch falling knives. I only wait for right-side signals: if the rebound lacks strength and a key support breaks, open a short at 0.01 with 20x leverage — this move yielded +750%.
For targets with such obvious unloading, direction matters more than courage. Going short with the trend is the only way to catch the wind. Don't ask where the bottom is; first see who is still selling.
(Review record, not investment advice) #美股与金银同步大跌，避险资金流向分化 OKX×ICE joint venture OKXICE announced on October 30: The number of listed companies opposing turning their own stocks into third-party tokens has reached 50, up from 26 just four days ago. The original plan was about 62 stocks, including Nvidia, Nike, Microsoft, and JPMorgan Chase on the list. CoinGecko spot OKB is about $114.24 (snapshot around 12:07 Beijing time, approximately +3.4%).
This is not a rejection of tokenization itself, but the SEC has temporarily granted issuers a 30-day veto right: if opposed, the stock cannot be listed in the form of third-party tokens on this exchange. Opponents might say that the remaining dozen or so can still operate; however, with most options cut from the menu, the 24-hour US stock narrative shrinks first.
A new batch of opposition lists will be released this week, and the launch date of the remaining targets is still uncertain. Consider this as pressure from issuers against unauthorized packaging, not as tokenized US stocks being dead. The issuer's self-operated path is still open; let's first see if the objection list grows longer.
$OKB
#OKXICE #Tokenization$ZEC This ZEC really has the flavor of a “bidding takeoff”!
Look at the 1-hour and 15-minute charts, from 1181 directly a deep V reversal, forcibly breaking through the MA20 and MA60 resistance, MACD underwater golden cross continuously expanding volume, the short-term trend is extremely fierce.
The short squeeze fuel is in place
You guess it will take off, I glanced at the data of chart 3, it’s simply a divine assist! This rally rose by 3%, but the long-short ratio is only 0.98, the short accounts are actually more than the long ones, and the funding rate is still negative. What does this mean? Countless retail investors are counter-trend topping and shorting halfway up the mountain! As long as the main force pulls up another big bullish candle in line with the trend, these shorts will explode on the spot, this is the purest "short squeeze rocket fuel."
Macro and suggestions
BTC is consolidating and bleeding, funds are all running to this old privacy coin to find a narrative. With short squeeze expectations, it is indeed bullish. But let’s not chase high at 1276 halfway up the mountain, wait for a pullback near 1250 to enter long on the right side, set a good stop loss, take a short squeeze dividend and then exit.The expansion of Lumentum's optical communication business reflects the spillover of AI computing power chain prosperity, linked with the expected demand for storage chips. SKHYNIX's current rebound is riding this narrative rhythm. I judge the short-term trend as slightly strong but with risks of chasing highs. The four-hour level has stabilized above the moving average and is trending upward, but the hourly line has weakened and fallen back, down 4.26% from the four-hour high. The oscillation indicator shows declining momentum. The buy-sell ratio is 0.69, with obvious selling pressure. The funding rate of 0.0124% indicates a mild bullish sentiment that is not overheated. Open interest increased by 48,000 contracts, showing limited volume-price coordination and a cautious stance. A light long position can be tried if it stabilizes after pulling back to 1085.6, with a stop loss at 1072.3 and a target of 1098.4; if it directly surges to around 1108.7 and faces resistance with stagnation, reduce positions, controlling holdings within 20%.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you successful trading.——
$SKHYNIX#Lumentum光通信业务扩张，订单表现待揭晓
#Lumentum光通信业务扩张，订单表现待揭晓
$SKHYNIX 🔍 Only 13 days apart, has the bottom appeared? What I'm focusing on is the 2022 interval in the material. Here's an interesting detail: according to reports, the intervals in 2014 and 2018 were 71 days and 39 days respectively, leading analysts to propose a window from the end of 2026 to early 2027.
Don't rush to conclusions yet. What concerns me more is whether the shortening interval will change the behavior of those waiting, rather than whether it can predict $BTC. Here's my speculation: if this window is repeatedly circulated, some who are waiting for the bottom might act early, because no one wants to realize they've missed out only after the calendar flips. But entering early doesn't mean the bottom comes early; selling pressure could still push expectations back.
I will keep watching: as this window approaches, is the market rushing ahead, or is there still selling pressure holding it down? This carries more information than the date itself. Do you think those who say "wait until after the election" might change their minds early? Let's watch the follow-up together and see whose speculation comes closer.On the eve of the election, the market grinds at the bottom, with altcoins polarizing first: Stablecoin chain $XPL on OKX around 0.0714 USDT, down about 14.7% in 24h; on 11/1 UTC, Hyperliquid long positions faced a chain of forced liquidations totaling about $24.5 million (nearly 99% longs), HLP once received about 160 million tokens but lost about $556,000; the next unlock is around 11/25 for about 88.89 million tokens (about $6.3 million). Nearby, $ONDO is around 0.404 (-1.3%), and since 10/29, 7 Intelligent Portfolios have launched on Solana (including 3 BlackRock strategies), with the ETH+BNB side of this series' TVL exceeding about $40 million. Are you holding the XPL structure after liquidation, or expanding ONDO's RWA distribution? Let's discuss in the comments. The above is only personal observation and does not constitute investment advice. #BTC持续承压，资金与市场走势出现分歧 $XPL $ONDO #Oklo核能供电布局距离商业化还有多远？
Oklo's current situation is quite surreal: its main business is power generation, but it hasn't charged a single cent for electricity, relying entirely on selling isotopes as side jobs to stay afloat; it is only expected to be powered on in 2028, which is like ordering takeout now and the restaurant says it will be delivered in 2028, and you still have to get approvals, raise funds, and build the plant first. ARK is still increasing its position, indicating this is no longer an investment, but a faith recharge. November 6 earnings preview: losses are certain, the key is whether the promises are realistic and how many more quarters of cash can be burned.On Monday Asian early trading, Brent $BZ dropped about $2, falling to around $111. Last Friday, the December contract just closed at 117.64, the highest since the end of April, but it gave up a portion over the weekend. Iran and Qatar have been negotiating in Doha for the third consecutive day. Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi told Al Jazeera that Qatar found the seven-day plan too long, so they changed it to two days: the first day for the US to implement a package of measures, and the second day for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
No conditions have been reduced. They demand lifting the newly added sanctions, restoring the June oil exemptions, reducing US military presence, recognizing the new shipping route delineated by Iran and Oman, ceasefires on all fronts including Lebanon, and unfreezing funds held in Qatar. Washington has not publicly responded. Rubio said negotiations are ongoing with no timetable, while Trump said talks are going well and he is not in a hurry.
The tension in the strait has not dissipated. On Sunday, the Revolutionary Guard claimed two oil tankers passed without permission and hit mines, though this has not been verified; on Saturday, Khamenei ordered the military to respond to any threat with "no territorial restrictions." Both the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported that the US is preparing for a possible new round of strikes after the midterm elections.
The $2 drop is just a negotiation premium; no extra barrels have come from the strait. The hardest part of the two-day plan is recognizing the new shipping route, which means the US would acknowledge Iranian control of the strait—Trump will not agree before the election. After the election, whether Washington responds with a letter or an airstrike will determine if 117.64 is the peak of this round or the starting point of the next; if the mine incident is confirmed, even this $2 will not hold. $CL #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ Top trader fully leverages to trade BTC! 1.7x spot leverage fully committed, floating profits steadily expanding, the top profit leaderboard operation is rock solid!
📊 Account & position data breakdown
✅ 100.00% win rate in the last 30 days, maximum drawdown only 7.67%, firmly holding 1st place on the 365-day profit leaderboard
✅ Currently fully invested in $BTC, spot leverage position at 169.7%, no other contract positions, purely profiting from coin price appreciation, total assets 16,408,764.24 U
Core analysis:
Previously closed all BTC perpetual contracts and converted everything into spot leverage to avoid holding costs from funding rates, steadily capturing large-scale rebound gains, a typical trend-following, no short-term speculation approach with very precise timing.
Having consistently topped the profit leaderboard for years, their control over long-term cycles is unquestionable, drawdown management is also very strong, this is a high-conviction heavy position attack, not blind market gambling.
But honestly, with tens of millions in capital, their risk tolerance is maxed out and drawdowns are controllable; ordinary people should not blindly follow with leverage, as poor position and stop-loss management can easily lead to being wiped out. Just observe the layout logic, don’t blindly copy trades.
Just a personal opinion, trading requires self-responsibility
#TopTraderLive #BTCTrading
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？