Orbit Post Sitemap
Only $26 away from liquidation, he overnight added $9.21 million
The follow-up to the 214 million order from early morning has arrived, and the position chart is even larger than previously seen.
At 11 PM last night, $ETH dropped to a low of $2,282, just $26 above this whale's liquidation price of $2,256. In the early morning, he urgently added $9.21 million USDC margin, pushing the liquidation price down from $2,256 to $2,181, buying a $75 buffer.
The full position also matches: 115,473 $ETH worth about $272 million, plus 1,539.5 $BTC worth about $124 million, totaling approximately $397 million. The liquidation price on the $BTC side is $70,396, still far away; the only tight spot is on the $ETH leg.
$ETH is currently around $2,351 (Beijing time 13:53), about 7% above the new liquidation line. The margin addition helps temporarily but can't stop the trend—if $ETH falls another 7%, this $397 million will be back at the liquidation threshold.Currently, the market heat is relatively high for a few coins: $IRYS, $ORDER, and $CT. I think these are coins with a high certainty of shorting. There is too much trapped capital piled up on the surface, and the main players have already exited during the spike. The chips in the market are very dispersed, mostly retail investors catching the falling knife! Originally, these three coins were just narrative coins with few actual uses and users. Fundamentally, I don't see much value. As long as the leverage is controlled below 3x, it should be possible to profit from the continuous gradual decline that follows!Next week, the US stock market will definitely face pressure, with a large number of Q3 earnings reports to be released and expectations of a Federal Reserve rate hike.. The expectation for a Fed rate hike in December has already surged to 80%, and big money will definitely exit early to avoid risk. $SOXL tech stock valuations have been tightly suppressed. Along with earnings reports from Microsoft, $MSFTB, Google, and Amazon, Wall Street now only cares about money. If the earnings show that spending hundreds of billions on AI is just burning money without profits, it will definitely trigger a new round of sell-offs.
Against the overall pressure, the script for memory chips is relatively clear. Although $SNDK and MU will most likely follow the market down initially, SK Hynix's abandonment of its US IPO has hindered NAND expansion, greatly reducing supply-side pressure. The correction is more than halfway done and will likely be partially repaired by performance.
Since the overall market is likely to be under downward pressure next week, looking at those contracts pegged to US stocks on Binance over the weekend, liquidity is terrible, with occasional midnight spikes wiping out long positions. Such liquidity-drained anomalies mean it’s better to open a short position before the market opens, even if just to position ahead for next week’s market. $BTC $ETH #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ #October FOMC Approaches, What Are the Variables for the Fed Pausing Rate Hikes? AI Infrastructure Major Test: Under Massive Revenue, Who Is Really Sharing Profits with Token Holders?
In the AI and computing power sector, the narrative is grand, but behind valuations often reaching billions, one needs to penetrate on-chain data to see the real "profit distribution." Stripping away press release filters, these companies have taken different paths.
$GRASS (Strong revenue but with capture gaps)
The real revenue in the tens of millions in the first half of the year is solid. But checking its cash flow: protocol profits mainly accumulate in subsidiaries, and the token lacks a hard mechanism for direct empowerment. Moreover, over 75% of tokens are still not circulating, and with minimal buybacks, the looming unlocking sell pressure is a long-term risk.
$VVV (Small but beautiful cash flow)
Entering privacy applications, it has real Web2 fiat subscription revenue, and the mechanism enforces mandatory buyback commissions. However, caution is needed as its scale is still small; if new financing or mechanism iterations are introduced later, will early buyback commitments be compromised?
In contrast, the veteran $TAO, despite having a large subnet ecosystem, has a small proportion of real fiat income and still heavily relies on token inflation subsidies to maintain network operation. A true deflationary closed loop has yet to form.
Summary: VVV > GRASS > TAO
A small tip:
When evaluating AI projects, don’t just look at revenue scale. Verify whether buyback terms have been secretly altered in V2/V3, and check if real fiat retention can cover inflation and unlocking. Distinguish between "paper prosperity" and a "real closed loop of hard cash." A net monthly fee of only $158,000, yet the coin price can surge nearly 70% in a day! $ORDER, no matter how I look at it, seems like a sequel to yesterday's $IRYS long-short meat grinder! Bitcoin is still hovering around 80,000, but ORDER surged nearly 70% in 24 hours, reaching a high of $0.103, then quickly dropped back to around $0.056, giving back more than 40% from the peak. Trading volume in the Korean market once surged to hundreds of billions of Korean won. With this kind of heat, who wouldn't be tempted? I think the capital play of these two coins is very similar: when the price is pulled up, the contract funding rate is negative. Our first reaction is that it's a bull trap, then the whales take the opportunity to dump. In fact, although ORDER has real business and a fee buyback mechanism, the protocol only earns a little over $100,000 a month. How could the coin price explode like this? I tend to believe there are whales pumping the price, actively sweeping spot sell orders to push the price up, then using contract shorts as fuel to keep pulling! The more the shorts don't believe it, the crazier the market gets. My judgment is that yesterday's IRYS and today's ORDER are both high-volatility capital markets driven by Korean market heat combined with contract speculation. This wave is all about capital and leverage, not some sudden value discovery!US tech stocks in the aftermarket collectively surge? What signals is the market sending?
Short covering: The sharp drop earlier caused RSI and other indicators to be deeply oversold. With no new macro black swan over the weekend, shorts, to avoid being counterattacked at Monday's open, used shallow liquidity to close positions early and push up prices.
Earnings guidance speculation: It is the peak US earnings season, with capital rushing to bet that cloud giants like Microsoft, Meta, and Google will continue to provide strong AI capital expenditure guidance. As long as big companies don’t cut their GPU budgets, semiconductors will see a violent valuation recovery.
⚠️ Beware of fake moves: The weekend market depth is extremely shallow; a few million dollars can create a big bullish candle. Although sentiment is warming, true or false breakouts must be verified by institutional trading volume after Monday’s US stock market open.
Explanation: What are the three common types of “aftermarket” in US stocks?
24-hour night/weekend market: The abnormal moves seen over the weekend or during Asian daytime 99% refer to this. It relies on Blue Ocean ATS or on-chain US stock contracts like Hyperliquid, OKX for round-the-clock trading. Mainly retail and speculative traders, it serves as a sentiment thermometer before the open.
Wall Street institutional dark pools: Private networks operated by investment banks like Goldman Sachs, accounting for nearly 40% of total US stock volume. When large institutions buy or sell billions, orders are completely hidden before execution to avoid pushing up costs. After a crash, if continuous “dark pool premium large orders” appear, that is solid proof of Wall Street’s real money bottom-fishing.
IPO grey market: Off-exchange pre-listing matching trades before a new stock officially rings the bell, serving as a pricing indicator for the first day of trading. 🔥 Continuous positive news for SUI, but on-chain funds are retreating?
Recently researching Sui, I found a contrast worth being cautious about.
On October 8, Sui announced a partnership with Samsung, planning to allow 82 million Galaxy device users in the US to access USDC on the Sui network through the Samsung Wallet.
This undoubtedly broadens the potential user entry points.
But the market doesn't seem to be rushing to buy into this news.
📉 According to DeFiLlama data, as of October 25, the stablecoin scale on the Sui chain is about $431 million, down 14.25% over 7 days; DEX trading volume dropped about 46.6% week-over-week.
I believe what Sui needs to prove now is not technical performance, but whether ecosystem cooperation can truly convert into funds and users.
⚠️ There is also an issue that cannot be ignored: SUI's maximum supply is 10 billion tokens, with about 4.1 billion currently circulating, and more token supply will be released in the future.
My judgment is that Sui has technical and application potential, but before on-chain liquidity recovers, cooperation news alone is insufficient to confirm a trend reversal.
Do you have more confidence in SUI's long-term ecosystem, or are you worried about its token supply pressure?
$SUI
#SUI #SuiNetwork #PublicChainCompetition #Cryptocurrency$NEAR is currently operating near the lower edge of the consolidation zone at around 4.5. Whether it has effectively broken below the consolidation requires further observation.
The consolidation range has been between 4.5 and 5.6 for 26 days.
Yesterday's major market drop saw $NEAR break below the consolidation DD at 4.3 down to 4.2. The lower shadow of that candlestick pierced down to 4.2, which is a typical wick caused by concentrated long position liquidations. Whether this is an effective breakdown still needs further observation.
The trading logic is to speculate on whether the breakdown is effective. If it breaks below 4.2 again, then stop loss is triggered with a 5% loss. If it holds above the consolidation at 4.5, then go long up to 5.6, with a risk-reward ratio of 4:1, making it worth the gamble.
Trading is not about win rate, but about risk-reward ratio.The realized market capitalization (Realized Cap) of $BTC is continuously rising, and this on-chain metric is currently more worth watching than the price itself. It calculates the total value of each BTC at the price of its last on-chain transfer—in simple terms, it represents the true cost basis of holdings across the entire market. When it moves upward, it means new funds are genuinely entering the market to push prices higher, raising the overall holding cost, rather than a paper boom built on leverage. Historically, sustained expansion of this metric is often a classic signal of a transition from a bear market bottom to the early stages of a bull market. But metrics aside, reality is much colder. Currently, macro liquidity is extremely tight, high oil prices are suppressing rate cut expectations, and the US tech sector is facing significant valuation cuts due to skepticism around the AI narrative. The market is dry; $BTC is repeatedly bottoming around 81,000, and $ETH can't even hold above 2,400. The real divergence point is here: on-chain data shows large funds quietly accumulating, and the long-term holding structure is indeed becoming healthier, but the macro environment is not cooperating. In the short term, the market still has to get through the Federal Reserve FOMC meeting and Middle East geopolitical risks. Bottoms are never built in a day; the process of bottoming itself is an endurance race. My judgment is that the market is overly focused on the fatigue of price consolidation, yet underestimates this structural change of the holding cost line continuously moving upward. The expansion of realized market cap means that chips are changing hands at higher cost intervals, and once macro pressure eases, this structure will amplify upward momentum; conversely, if liquidity continues to tighten, high-cost chips will also become a source of selling pressure. The truthThe weekend saw a broad market pullback, which is an active risk contraction by capital, not a panic sell-off of $ETH $ZEC $BTC
Watching the market on Saturday, it wasn’t a crash of a single coin but almost all coins moving down together.
This downward gradient is very important, indicating it’s not a panic stampede but everyone quietly reducing their risk positions.
Moreover, concerns about AI financing in the stock market have already spread to the crypto space.
That’s why this pullback is so orderly; the problem isn’t with any specific project or chain market, but an overall tightening of risk limits by top-level capital. When the external market adjusts, the first thing to move in crypto isn’t thematic stories but the positions everyone holds.
First, whether BTC can hold the key psychological level of 80,000, which is the baseline of market sentiment, not the price bottom.
Second, whether only a few sectors will withstand the downturn, which will determine where capital is willing to go next. One controls confidence, the other controls the pace.
Optimistically, mainstream coins fall less, small caps fall more, selling pressure is released in an orderly manner, and there is no collective stampede. Once external concerns ease, oversold small coins will have greater rebound elasticity.
The risk is, if 80,000 doesn’t hold, this mild pullback will quickly turn into forced liquidation, making it very difficult for the small caps that fell more to recover later.
The essence now is that capital is lowering its risk budget, not a sudden negative shock sell-off. This kind of market usually grinds slowly and rarely reverses sharply in one move. This weekend’s move looks more like a shift in sentiment, not the market being completely over.$BTC dominance is still held down at 59.5%, and the entire market of $2.72 trillion dropped 2.73% in one day. The big caps are retreating, but the ones gaining are all small sectors with market caps of a few hundred million dollars. The L3, BONK.fun ecosystem, and TON Meme can be viewed together; they are meme and highly volatile small caps within the public chain ecosystem, representing a lottery-style approach in a bear market. Private equity credit tokenization has a much larger scale, with a 4.5% rise marking another trend, more like funds seeking a place with returns to hide. USDT's market cap did not increase in one day; it even shrank slightly, indicating no new money coming in off-exchange. Dominance remains high; this round is existing funds moving around within the market, shifting from large caps to small caps to seek volatility. This rotation without new money won't last more than a few days; small caps' gains will be given back first. The end signals to watch for are two: the fear and greed index falling from 54 back below 53 from a week ago, or the single-day gains of the L3 and BONK.fun ecosystems underperforming the overall market. Conversely, if USDT's market cap turns positive, it means new money is coming in to take over.Long positions have not exited yet. The 4-hour MACD is about to have the fast line cross the slow line, and the 1-hour level is oversold. There is still a lot of capital buying at the bottom. Yesterday, the price dropped to around 79,200 but then recovered to around 80,800. The 80,000 psychological level has not been effectively broken. It depends on the strength of the rebound. Currently, short-term liquidation volume is around 82,800. If the rebound is rejected at this level, I will reverse to short.
Additionally, crude oil prices remain high, and there is the FOMC meeting next week. There are too many unstable factors, so it might not be a V-shaped reversal, only a rebound. Of course, I am still bullish on BTC in the long term.
Intraday plan: open the first long position at the current price of 80,800, reserve a position to add at 79,500, target 82,800 (holding until Monday night) $BTC $ETH #BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ "Clearing Tide Recedes, Tug-of-War Begins"
In the past 24 hours, the crypto leverage market finally caught a breather. BTC liquidations amounted to approximately $24,925,400, with longs at $15,485,900 and shorts at $9,439,500; ETH liquidations were about $27,623,800, with longs at $14,818,400 and shorts at $12,805,400. Combined, they total $52,549,200, a significant drop from the previous round's roughly $173 million, shifting the market from a storm to a steady drizzle.
Structural changes are even more critical. Previously, BTC long liquidations accounted for 93.1%, ETH for 84.5%, meaning bulls bore almost all the impact alone; in this round, BTC longs dropped to 62.1%, ETH to only 53.6%, with ETH longs and shorts nearly evenly split. During BTC's rebound, some short-sellers were also liquidated, raising the short liquidation share to 37.9%.
This indicates that leverage enthusiasm is cooling, and one-sided stampedes have eased, but longs remain the main force behind liquidations. The market is far from a time to relax: chasing rallies may lead to losses, and selling off could also face rebounds. The next episode of the "Liquidation Mini-Drama" often stars those with the strongest emotions.
$BTC $ETH
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ BTCFi Track Shakeup: Why Does CORE Win? Valuation Rebuild at $0.018, Target Price Seen at $0.5
The BTCFi track is undergoing a severe purge, with many projects relying solely on incentives to maintain TVL and lacking differentiated foundations. $CORE, based on the Satoshi Plus consensus and a non-custodial BTC staking framework, is one of the few public chains in the track to truly achieve native BTC staking. This is the core logic behind bulls' optimism for its valuation rebuild.
At the $0.018 level, it has fallen drastically from the previous high of $6, with the market treating it as an oversold target. The optimistic target is $0.5, corresponding to nearly a 28x increase. However, the threshold to realize this target is very high: SatPay must obtain compliance licenses and go live, the on-chain fee loop must be fully operational to execute buybacks based on fees; the number of validators must recover, the node community must expand, and decentralization and security must be restored.
The current reality is weighed down by multiple negative factors: the ghost chips from the August vulnerability have not been cleared, official nodes continue to withdraw, only about 20 independent validators remain, and security redundancy is very low; on-chain gas income is minimal, the previous Q3 buyback plan has completely failed, and large chip transfers continue from reserve addresses.
There are also strong competitors in the same track such as Babylon and Stacks, making competition fierce. BTC staking relies on Bitcoin's CLTV time lock, with a principal channel that is independent and stable, but $0.5 is a high-expectation scenario, not a guaranteed outcome. Valuation rebuild must be proven through business implementation and cannot rely solely on the narrative of track reshuffling.Amazon's Q3 report will test whether AWS demand can translate into financial durability. Jassy's statement that 2026 capacity is sold out and much of 2027 is booked supports a strong AI-compute backdrop. The unresolved issue is whether the infrastructure needed to meet those commitments can expand without eroding margins and free cash flow.
#AmazonQ3AWSOutlook BTCFi Track Shakeup: Why Does CORE Win? Valuation Rebuild at $0.018, Target Price Seen at $0.5
The BTCFi track is undergoing a severe purge, with many projects relying solely on incentives to maintain TVL and lacking differentiated foundations. $CORE, based on the Satoshi Plus consensus and a non-custodial BTC staking framework, is one of the few public chains in the track to truly achieve native BTC staking. This is the core logic behind bulls' optimism for its valuation rebuild.
At the $0.018 level, it has fallen drastically from the previous high of $6, with the market treating it as an oversold target. The optimistic target is $0.5, corresponding to nearly a 28x increase. However, the threshold to realize this target is very high: SatPay must obtain compliance licenses and go live, the on-chain fee loop must be fully operational to execute buybacks based on fees; the number of validators must recover, the node community must expand, and decentralization and security must be restored.
The current reality is weighed down by multiple negative factors: the ghost chips from the August vulnerability have not been cleared, official nodes continue to withdraw, only about 20 independent validators remain, and security redundancy is very low; on-chain gas income is minimal, the previous Q3 buyback plan has completely failed, and large chip transfers continue from reserve addresses.
There are also strong competitors in the same track such as Babylon and Stacks, making competition fierce. BTC staking relies on Bitcoin's CLTV time lock, with a principal channel that is independent and stable, but $0.5 is a high-expectation scenario, not a guaranteed outcome. Valuation rebuild must be proven through business implementation and cannot rely solely on the narrative of track reshuffling.#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？
SK Hynix 2026 Q3 Earnings Preview Brief
Note: The following is only a market expectation analysis and does not constitute investment advice. The official earnings report will be released on October 28.
1. Core Conclusions
✅ High probability of profitability, with prospects to maintain high profits and even challenge historical highs; however, HBM4 only contributes incremental gains this quarter, with the main profit source still being HBM3E.
Mainstream market brokers unanimously expect SK Hynix to achieve substantial operating profit in Q3, and community trading sentiment leans toward "earnings beating expectations"; however, there are potential downside risks from slower-than-expected HBM4 ramp-up and delayed customer orders.
2. Profit Support Logic (Positive Factors)
1. HBM high-value product line driving growth (most critical)
HBM overall is the profit pillar for SK Hynix. Although in Q3, HBM3E shipments have a higher proportion and contribute the main profits; HBM4 is in the capacity expansion ramp-up phase in Q3, with shipments gradually increasing and unit prices significantly higher than regular DRAM. AI inference and large model KV cache demand remain strong, with leading cloud providers and AI chip manufacturers having long-term locked orders. HBM product ASP (average selling price) remains firm, and gross margin is much higher than ordinary memory chips. 10.24 Market Update | Increasing Divergence, Defense First
$BTC 80,000 Defense Battle
BTC is currently around $81,400, with funding showing early red flags: overnight ETF net outflow of $635 million, the largest single-day outflow since June 25. Short-term divergence has clearly intensified, with 81,000 having flipped from support to resistance, increasing pressure above the price.
The first line of defense below remains in the 80,000–80,500 range. ETF holding costs are mainly concentrated between 80,000 and 81,500, which can be regarded as the bulls' bottom line; if lost, the defensive space will further shrink. If the rebound fails to reclaim 82,000, it looks more like a weak recovery rather than a trend reversal, and the rebound should be seen as a window to reduce positions. The current strategy prioritizes defense, waiting for price to reconfirm strength or weakness. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #AI需求支撑存储市场，芯片股行情反复 Brothers, let's watch the market directly at noon on Sunday, no empty talk.
LAB slid from 0.044 to 0.037, the worst part is no one is buying. The project itself is not bad, Animoca and OKX have both supported it, but utility tokens depend on user base, and when the market weakens, the price can only shrink accordingly. The order book shows a sell cost of 80,000 and a push-up cost of 220,000; if 0.037 doesn't hold, don't fool yourself into bottom-fishing.
BTC is now at 80191, there are buyers at 80,000 but they are not the same group as the sellers. On-chain, 40 new wallets withdrew 9,458 BTC from Wintermute, indicating long-term accumulation; meanwhile, market makers are still depositing coins to exchanges, indicating short-term selling. These two forces are staring each other down above 80,000. There's a 70% chance the FOMC won't move rates next Tuesday, so don't shoot all your bullets early. If 80,000 holds, expect consolidation; if not, look for 75,000.
ETH is tearing apart the worst. Around 2300, a whale has a 155 million buy order supporting it; exchanges saw a daily outflow of 160,000 ETH, a four-month high, but early OG wallets are selling, and futures are still dominated by sellers. It depends on who blinks first—if 2300 holds, the pullback is valid; if not, below 2256 and 2226 there are whale liquidation prices, and 2200 is the next target.
The fear and greed index is just above 50, stuck in the middle, which is the most frustrating.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ #中东原油供应风险再起，油价持续走强 $BTC $ETH $IRYS #Strong demand for AWS computing power, what are the highlights of Amazon's Q3 earnings report? Amazon will release its Q3 earnings report after the U.S. market closes on October 29. The market expects revenue of about $202.1 billion and an EPS of about $2.01. My prediction is: revenue will slightly exceed expectations, EPS also has a chance to surpass $2.01, but profits may not be as stable as revenue. There are three reasons: First, the revenue side is relatively reassuring. The company’s guidance for Q3 is $197 billion to $202 billion, the market expectation is already slightly above the upper limit of the guidance, but Amazon has often exceeded its own guidance in the past. Q2 revenue has already reached $200.6 billion, a year-on-year increase of about 19.6%, and AWS growth has accelerated again. As long as the consumer business does not weaken significantly, achieving $202 billion to $204 billion in Q3 is not difficult. Second, AWS is the most important highlight this time. Q2 AWS revenue was about $42.2 billion, a year-on-year increase of nearly 37%, with operating profit about $16.6 billion. The market expects AWS growth in Q3 to approach 40%; if revenue reaches $46 billion to $47 billion, it can basically support revenue exceeding expectations. The current market buying Amazon is mainly buying into AWS and the renewed acceleration of AI cloud demand. Third, be cautious on the profit side. Q2 capital expenditures have already reached $54.2 billion, operating cash flow $45.4 billion, and free cash flow was negative $8.8 billion. Q1 free cash flow was even negative $18.2 billion. These AI data center investments will not all beLast night's move was really tough... Bitcoin $BTC first smashed through the 80,000 whole number level, plunging down to around 79,000. It looked like it was about to break down and accelerate, but then it quickly bounced back. $ETH had a similar story. What's even more interesting is that in just 4 hours, long positions in the crypto market liquidated over $400 million. This is why I've always been reluctant to chase breakouts over the weekend—liquidity is thin, and key levels are often crowded with lots of stop-loss and forced liquidation orders, which can trigger a chain reaction once hit. But after this wave of passive selling is released, if the follow-up selling pressure doesn't come, those who shorted will be in an awkward spot 😇. However, I’m not ready to call a reversal yet. Regaining 80,000 is definitely good, but resistance remains above. What’s really worth watching is whether there will be funds willing to push higher after the traditional financial markets open on Monday. If the previous downtrend zone can’t be reclaimed soon, this lower shadow candle at best only proves that the bears didn’t break through this time. Don’t assume the bottom has come just because of a fake breakdown; the market loves to punish those who rush to conclusions.PPP prediction market tool monitoring shows that in the Polymarket prediction event "Will the Fed keep rates unchanged in October," accounts with cumulative losses exceeding $30,000 (0x88b21efc4aa4e08cdc125300ad6b3a
The impact of macro news on risk assets is not simply that good data leads to gains and bad data leads to losses. Stronger data may improve growth expectations but also raise the interest rate path; these two forces do not always align.
How much the market has already priced in also determines the reaction. Data that meets consensus and data that significantly deviates from expectations, even if the published values are the same, should not be interpreted in the same way.
My observation sequence is whether interest rate expectations have changed, whether the dollar and U.S. Treasuries respond, and then whether risk assets continue. Taking only the initial post-release fluctuation does not represent the completion of the entire pricing cycle.
$BTC ,
#BTC $BTCYesterday when BTC dropped, what bothered me the most was that contract positions barely decreased. The price was smashed down, leverage was still there, bottom-fishers kept rushing in, and those betting on further drops kept adding; both sides took a hit but still believed they could win.
The on-chain reaction wasn’t that intense; realized losses in actual terms didn’t amplify, but rather decreased. For now, there’s no sign of widespread forced selling; it looks more like sell orders met fewer weekend buyers, pushing the price down. But who exactly sold and why, I won’t guess yet. Just based on the price dropping then bouncing back, I’m not confident to call the shakeout over.
Later, I still want to find an opportunity to go long, waiting first for 80000. If it dips near 79800 but quickly recovers to 80000, I’ll buy lightly, set stop loss at 79500, take half profits at 81000, and hold the rest aiming for 81800. If it falls and can’t recover for half a day, I won’t enter; I don’t want to turn a rebound catch into continuous averaging down.
If 80000 really breaks down and the rebound to 79800–80000 is pressed down again, I’ll switch to short, admit the mistake at 80400, first target 79000, then 78500. If there’s no rebound, I won’t chase; I’m afraid of a sudden spike down where shorts just opened and it pulls back immediately.
Similarly, I won’t prematurely bet on 82000; if it breaks above and holds on a pullback, I’ll add small longs, stop loss at 81500, and target 82800 and 83500. Positions are still crowded and haven’t moved out, so a sharp move could come anytime. I’d rather wait for it to move first, earn a bit less, than get hit repeatedly in the middle and end up with the right direction but a losing account.Yesterday BTC took a sharp dive down, and I thought this time it would finally wash out a batch of contracts. But looking at this set of data, the OI didn't drop much, and the realized losses on-chain even decreased. Wow, the coin price fell, but the people betting inside are all holding strong one after another.
This makes me a bit hesitant to directly chase the rebound. Since October 14, positions have been piling in continuously; even after the drop, they haven't left, and I guess many are still adding. There's no obvious on-chain capitulation, so I can only say that for now, there's no large-scale recognition of losses. We can't just assume someone deliberately dumped yesterday and that it must rebound today. I don't know who sold, I only know the leverage is still crowded inside.
Later, I plan to wait until around 80,000 to make a move. For example, if it dips to 79,800 and quickly pulls back above 80,000, I'll take a small position, set a stop loss at 79,500, sell half if it bounces to 81,000, and try for 81,800 with the rest. If it breaks below 80,000 and then lingers without recovering, I won't enter; I'll wait for a failed rebound at 80,000 before considering shorting, with a stop loss at 80,400, and then look down to 79,000 and 78,500.
The 82,000 area is the same. Whether the 106 coins previously placed there were withdrawn or executed needs to be checked again. If it really holds and bounces back after a pullback, I'll follow, targeting 82,800 and 83,500, and exit if it falls back to 81,500.
Right now, the easiest way to lose is to see two green candles and fear missing out, then see two red candles and want to reverse. I'll first plan my orders, act when the time comes, and if not, just watch them play around. Don't let the market not even start moving and you already take three rounds of stop losses yourself.Brothers, there are two variables worth keeping a close eye on recently.
The first is SK Hynix about to release its Q3 earnings report, and the market is betting on whether HBM4 can continue to boost profits. The AI storage sector has been very volatile lately; whether the earnings beat expectations directly affects tech stock sentiment, which then transmits to the crypto market.
The second is the geopolitical front, where Trump has said the Iran war might end soon. Once the market hears peace expectations, risk appetite immediately rises. Remember the ceasefire optimism back in April this year? At that time, BTC was pushed up to 72,700 directly. Now BTC is hovering around 80,500, still 36% below the all-time high but at a much higher level than back then.
Simply put: if peace really materializes, a short-term bounce is highly likely; but if the situation fluctuates or escalates again, the risk of a downturn is also significant.
Don’t rush in just because of headlines as confirmation signals. If you really want to act, focus on three things—whether oil prices fall, whether the dollar is strong, and whether BTC price itself can hold steady. These three are more reliable than any news.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ #中东原油供应风险再起，油价持续走强 $BTC $ETH $IRYS Cardano holders are proposed to vote on allocating 22 million $ADA (~5 million USD) from the Treasury to invest in tokenization.
Notably:
Only 67% of the capital is used to purchase physical assets, the remaining 33% is allocated for fees and operations.
The token price must increase by 49.4% to break even.
Toto Finance expects the token price to rise by 69% within 2 years.
This entity could receive up to 3.36 million $ADA, equivalent to 15% of the proposed capital.
🗳️ Voting ends on 11/15.
Is the expected profit sufficient to offset the risk for Cardano's Treasury? The past 24 hours delivered a textbook leverage flush rather than a verdict on valuation. Some $815 million in positions were liquidated and 201,000 traders were forced out, with longs accounting for 92.6% of the damage as open interest slid to $140.1 billion. That distinction matters: a deleveraging event inflicts short-term pain, while a genuine repricing of value inflicts long, grinding pain. The evidence so far points to the former. Two pillars support that reading. First, the negative overh$SPCX In short, telecom stocks evaporate (US stocks)
SpaceX is looking for thousands of base stations, possibly to become the fourth US carrier.
AT&T fell about 5.6%, hitting a more than three-month low; T-Mobile fell about 5%; Verizon fell about 1.6%; Deutsche Telekom (which controls T-Mobile) also fell about 3%. Conversely, Crown Castle surged about 10%+, and American Tower and SBA also rose.
On Thursday night, Bloomberg revealed: SpaceX is negotiating with tower companies to acquire at least 80,000 US base station sites, aiming to become the fourth nationwide carrier, Starlink Mobile. Negotiation targets include Crown Castle (about 40,000 towers nationwide).
Why 80,000? The US had about 158,500 dedicated base stations last year, and SpaceX wants to take half. Satellites alone can't reach inside buildings or cover urban areas, so they must rent ground towers; combined with the recently purchased low-frequency spectrum and FCC-approved direct-to-phone satellites, this completes the "sky + ground" entry ticket. At the earnings call, SpaceX said the goal is to launch service with the new spectrum by early 2028. Some investment banks estimate the nationwide ground network may require over $80 billion in investment.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Just took a couple of bites of lunch, casually opened the market screen, almost choked! Bitcoin is consolidating sideways on top, while popular altcoins are showing a stark contrast, the data looks bad, can't understand this logic, rushing in is just giving away money
$ZEC current price 1216, looks like it rose nearly 4% against the trend, pretty strong? Looking closely at the data, the 4-hour long-short ratio is only 1.04! This indicates that most of the previous bulls have been washed out, now it's a battle of equals between bulls and bears, and open interest is shrinking. Such a rally often lacks follow-through, definitely don't chase the highs
Next, $HYPE current price 76.7, steadily declining, but the 4-hour long-short ratio is as high as 2.40! Retail investors are incredibly stubborn, all holding on or even adding positions. With such heavy load, the main force can't push it up at all. Without a thorough cleanup, there's no chance
Finally, $UNI current price 6.83, down nearly 2%, just like HYPE, the 4-hour long-short ratio soared to 2.46, all retail investors fighting hard in a long squeeze. Open interest is visibly declining, indicating funds are quietly withdrawing, short-term downside remains
Summary: The market is consolidating, altcoins are mercilessly killing bulls, the more retail investors refuse to believe, the harder it is for the market to bottom out
Brothers, have you been caught in the trap with these altcoins? Are you still holding on or cutting losses now?
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？
#OKX星球话题来啦
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 Is this time different? Bitcoin's "election script" has already failed
Historical data is indeed glaring: in four midterm election years, Bitcoin was not spared, with drawdowns ranging from 27% to 72%. Worse yet, in Q4, three out of four election years ended with losses. According to the old script, the bottom should appear only after the voting day—71 days waited in 2014, 38 days in 2018, and 13 days in 2022.
But this year, the timeline has been disrupted. On July 1, at $57,850, the low point came 125 days before the election day. By October 22, the price had rebounded to $81,455, an increase of about 40%. The market didn’t wait for the election; it bottomed out first.
The real focus now is not November 3, but two overlapping cost figures: the short-term holders’ average price of $73,000 and the Strategy institutional cost of $75,446. These two numbers crowd the same range, making it the battleground between bulls and bears.
The current price has fallen below $80,000, with an intraday low of $79,146. The liquidation heatmap shows $80,000–$80,844 as a dense liquidation zone, and below $79,000 there is about $3.6 billion in long positions still under pressure. $80,000 is the first gate, $78,000 the second, and $73,000–$75,000 is the final threshold testing the true strength of the bull market.
CoinDesk is right: midterm weakness reflects Bitcoin’s own cycle, not the election. The election only creates volatility; the cost zone determines life or death. November 3 can see a drop, but $73,000–$75,000 cannot be lost. Losing that is the real problem.$APR type of market, looking at indicators is a waste of time.
Moving averages, support and resistance essentially just count "where many people traded in the past," then assume later traders will refer to these levels. But for these small market cap coins, the daily volume dumped can be larger than the market cap itself, possibly controlled by just one or two players — its next move doesn't need to follow any statistical rules, it only needs to calculate how much inventory it still holds.
So you can only guess the intention. The reason to pick it is clear: it has dropped for three months, the trapped positions above are either cut losses or lying flat, so the resistance to a rally is minimal; the market cap is small, doubling it doesn't cost much.
The purpose of the rally isn't to make it valuable, but to turn "it's rising" into an advertisement — topping the charts naturally attracts clicks; once people come in, the high turnover gradually distributes the coins to those chasing the highs.
The typical method is three stages: grinding at low levels, straight-line rally, high-level turnover. Now it’s dropping from the high point, indicating the second stage is over and the third stage is underway.
So don’t ask how much higher it can go. Ask how much inventory it still holds — once it's all sold, the story ends. First, consider the worst-case scenario: if the market continues to decline, the unrealized profit on this long position could be lost, or even turn into a loss. When I used to do risk control, my first reaction to seeing a "100% win rate" was not admiration, but to ask: how much loss can be tolerated this time?
According to Lookonchain monitoring, a trader who previously profited $3.3 million through NEAR trading went long on 26,974 $ETH after the market dropped, with a position value of about $63.88 million, currently holding an unrealized profit of about $842,000. My judgment is that this looks more like a display of a large risk exposure, not a bullish basis that ordinary people can simply copy.
⚠️ I will focus on three gaps: the "100% win rate" in the title, the source does not specify the statistical period or number of trades, so stability cannot be judged; position value does not equal invested principal, leverage and margin situation are unknown, so even if the direction is the same, the ability to withstand volatility may be completely different; $842,000 is still unrealized profit and cannot be considered as realized gains.
For ordinary people, a more practical risk control habit I recommend is: first convert the tolerable loss per trade into a proportion of the total account, then check the position size, and don't take someone else's win rate to bear your own risk. When seeing such large long position news, how much stop loss do you usually set for a single trade? Is it based on price fluctuations or on account loss proportion? #英特尔代工转型迎来Terafab新变量
Intel's IFS foundry business is at a critical ramp-up stage, and the Terafab project led by Elon Musk has become an important new variable in its transformation path. The two parties have reached a cooperation agreement, with Intel providing 18A, 14A advanced process and advanced packaging capabilities to supply Tesla, xAI, and SpaceX with chips for autonomous driving, humanoid robots, and space computing power.
For Intel, Terafab brings substantial long-term orders that can continuously drive the utilization rate of advanced process capacity, proving that its foundry services can meet the demands of leading AI end-users, addressing external doubts about its yield and customer ecosystem weaknesses, and aligning with the U.S. domestic chip capacity strategy.
However, uncertainties are also prominent. The project's investment scale is extremely large, the long-term goal of 1 terawatt computing power is difficult to achieve and will take a long time, and it is unlikely to contribute to revenue in the short term. At the same time, Terafab mainly uses chips for its own use and is not open to global foundry customers, so it will not directly help Intel capture a broad range of third-party clients.
On one hand, there are certain orders as a foundation; on the other, there are risks in realizing the grand plan. The market is paying attention to subsequent cooperation details and capacity scheduling, which will directly affect Intel's foundry business profitability expectations and valuation logic.Falling from $6 to 0.018, is CORE still salvageable? In-depth review: It is the hidden dark horse in the next bull market
Falling from the historical high of $6 to 0.018, the drop is huge. Many have directly judged it as worthless, but some see it as a potential dark horse in the bull market. The divergence stems from the fact that the underlying framework and commercialization realization are two different matters. The underlying Satoshi Plus consensus and non-custodial BTC staking mechanism are truly implemented, relying on Bitcoin's CLTV contract. The BTC principal redemption logic is independent and stable, which is the core foundation that distinguishes it from pure air coins and the basis for bullish optimism.
However, there are many current negative factors: the 8.31 reward loophole has planted ghost chips causing selling pressure; the September hard fork only blocked new issuance, but existing escape chips remain uncleared; SatPay is constrained by continuous delays in financial licensing, and the roadmap revenue buyback has completely failed due to minimal on-chain gas income; official nodes continue to withdraw, with only about 20 independent validators left, approaching the 15-node shutdown red line, causing decentralization goals to shrink.
Whether it can become a dark horse highly depends on the only revenue-generating lever, SatPay's compliant launch and the fee cycle running smoothly, attracting institutional funds; if the product continues to stall, it is more likely to maintain low-cost contraction, relying on slight recovery of BTC market beta, making it difficult to replicate its former highlights.
Staking BTC relies on Bitcoin's timelock, with a stable principal channel, but CORE reward distribution depends on the stable operation of the public chain. A crash does not equal an inevitable reversal; the premise for the dark horse narrative to hold is the fulfillment of revenue commitments, not simply relying on overselling.$APR has just over 200 million circulating shares, and every 15 minutes, 150 million are traded. What is it trying to do?🔥 Big Player Update｜Market Sentiment
Yesterday, Arthur Hayes announced the liquidation of directional trading positions in Maelstrom, involving assets such as ETH, ENA, and UNI.
On-chain tracking agencies estimate the related trades to be about $22.28 million.
Interestingly, nine days ago he was still publicly bullish on BTC and ETH.
😂 The most authentic scene in crypto: you can verbally stay bullish long-term, but your positions can be liquidated at any time.
My view: Opinions can be firm, but fund management must be flexible.
Do you think Hayes is hedging in advance, or selling at the bottom once again?#Can Robinhood's trading business growth continue? #BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ 先给结论：8万上方这一周守得住，但别指望ETF那点申赎把价格抬回去。买盘稳不稳，看的不是那几亿美元进出，是杠杆还剩多少没被清掉。 10月22日美国现货产品净流出6.36亿美元，23日再走1.38亿，两天7.74亿；而在这之前的三天是净进10.78亿，一周合起来还是净进3亿。整个10月由正转负，大约负1.76亿。同一时间价格从8.27万掉到7.92万，四个小时内4.04亿美元多单被打掉，24小时清算8.15亿、二十万人出局。把这两组数字摆在一起，顺序就出来了：ETF是跟着价格走的边际买家，不是领先指标。 赎回是机械的被动卖盘——钱走一批，基金就得在盘口卖一批货。更要紧的是美国那边的产品周末不交易，周五的抛压得等周一开盘才结算。所以周六那根针不是ETF砸出来的，是永续市场的杠杆在放血。这一层想明白，就不会把周末的低点当成机构在撤退。 真正被打掉的是多头。24小时里以太的清算额1.37亿，只比比特币少2,200万，可它的市值不到比特币的五分之一——仓位堆得更狠的地方，血流得更多。最大的单笔是一笔1,185万美元的多单，2,307.65被清掉。同10.25 $ETH "Peace Talks Fail" Strategy:
ETH price dropped from 2360 to 2281 then pulled back to 2360. Although the level seems unchanged, this intense shakeout completed two things: long leverage was forcibly liquidated (passive selling pressure exhausted), and short high-position profit-taking was also realized and exited.
In other words, the long-short structure at the 2360 level has been reshuffled, all old chips washed out, and longs and shorts have regrouped near 2360 to start a new round of competition.
Considering the short-term decline in expectations for "peace talks" in the US-Iran situation, the marginal risk of "opening fire" is rising, uncertainty is increasing, and short-term sentiment leans toward risk aversion. Grid high short positions, set stop losses properly. $BTC $DOGE #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？
With Robinhood's trading volume so strong, can earnings per share exceed $0.56?
After the U.S. market closed on October 27, Robinhood released its Q3 earnings report.
The market expects revenue of $1.44 billion and earnings per share of $0.56.
Looking through the business data, it’s indeed impressive:
In August, stock trading reached $335 billion, options trading 293 million contracts, crypto trading $17.5 billion, and event contracts 4.7 billion contracts.
This company now makes money not only from stock trading but also from prediction markets.
But here’s the question: while user trading is lively, how much profit does the platform actually keep?
In the screenshot, the Outcomes Yes quote is 74¢, and No quote is 27¢.
The market clearly leans toward exceeding expectations, but a 74¢ buy-in cost means even if the prediction is correct, the maximum profit per contract is only 26¢, while a wrong guess could lose 74¢.
The real calculation here isn’t how good the earnings report is, but whether the good news is worth 74¢.
I’m more interested in tracking trading revenue, growth in crypto business and prediction markets, and whether expenses have ballooned.
The stock market rewards exceeding expectations, but the prediction market requires factoring in the buy-in price first. Two questions, and getting one right isn’t enough.
This time with HOOD, do you think the $0.56 threshold is too low, or is 74¢ already too expensive?
$HOOD $SPX $ZEC
Few people pay attention to ZEC's funding rate, I took a quick look: -0.0077%, shorts are still paying. But the price rose 4% in 24 hours, pulling back from 1119 to 1217.
After such a long decline, some are still stubbornly shorting; when the rebound comes, they will have to cover. Negative funding rates rising are more reliable than positive funding rates rising, that's how I always see it.
Another point: ZEC trading volume on Unit broke $2 billion. Volume is picking up, funding rate is opposite, contracts and spot are not conflicting; this combination is more interesting than just looking at the candlesticks.
The intraday high of 1225 hasn't been broken yet, so I won't add positions for now. Let the market move on its own above that level for me to see.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $BTC Watch: Major players precisely controlling the market, extreme deep V shakeout to avoid chain liquidations
This wave of movement is literally a textbook example of "targeted demolition." BTC dropped from 82,000 all the way down to 79,220.1, just over 200 dollars short of triggering a massive chain liquidation of 855 million USD below 79,000.
The big players slammed the brakes at the last moment and reversed to pull out a deep V, currently at 80,908.
This is no coincidence but an extreme shakeout precisely calculated by the major players.
Looking closely at the market logic: first a sharp drop to sweep out all the high-leverage longs and dense stop-loss orders below, then after accumulating enough bloodied chips, immediately pulling back above the 80,000 mark.
If it really broke below 79,000 triggering the 855 million chain liquidation, the market would completely lose control, and the subsequent cost for the major players to defend the market would rise exponentially.
Therefore, hitting the critical point and then pulling back is the perfect script.
Although it barely reclaimed the 80,000 level, volume has shrunk drastically, with a 24-hour turnover of only 294 million.
Ahead of the Fed's FOMC meeting and midterm elections, this is a typical liquidity vacuum shakeout period.
Temporarily out of the liquidation danger zone, but until the macro environment becomes clear, this kind of extreme up-and-down tug-of-war with sharp spikes will likely repeat.$BTC short-term funds have started to flow back, with a 4-hour spot net inflow of $4.54 million and a contract net inflow of $281 million. However, over 24 hours, spot and contracts still show net outflows of $131 million and $423 million respectively, indicating overall weak capital.
$ETH pressure is even more evident, with 24-hour spot and contract net outflows reaching $123 million and $518 million respectively, and a 30-day contract net outflow expanding to $8.21 billion.
$SOL spot and contracts have 24-hour net outflows of $7.11 million and $63.39 million respectively, with the rebound lacking sustained capital support.
$ZEC, although showing stronger short-term capital performance with 24-hour spot and contract net inflows of $3.88 million and $59.77 million respectively, and a one-week contract net inflow of $224 million, still has a 30-day net outflow of about $997 million, so a trend reversal cannot be confirmed yet.
My view remains bearish.
Short-term capital inflows may just be short-covering or low-level speculation. As long as medium- to long-term capital flows do not show significant improvement, the market will find it hard to truly stabilize.
Key focus going forward: whether $BTC can drive overall capital inflows, and whether $ETH, $SOL, and $ZEC can halt the ongoing outflow trend. Short-term rebounds can be observed but it is premature to declare a bull market return.
#BTCETFFlowSwings At noon while eating and scrolling on my phone, an elder brother in the group suddenly said: Is AAVE about to collapse? I just topped up last week.
I took a bite and replied: First figure out what exactly you're afraid of. It dropped 4.5% today, nearly 10% in seven days, down 27% from the half-year high, definitely ugly.
But guess what's the funniest thing today—the project team adjusted the USDT borrowing interest rate inflection point in the Ethereum main pool from 94% to 92%, and a bunch of people called it bad news. I looked at it for a while, what is this thing for? It's just that when the collateral rate hits 92%, the borrowing interest suddenly steepens, acting as a brake to prevent a run. Changing this means the platform itself admits the USDT pool has been a bit tight recently; it's not a crash, just closing the gate early.
Interest rates go up, everyone repays, the pool stabilizes. Those who really understand lending look at whether bad debts will come, not this single bearish candle.
If you're still panicking at this point, you're probably one of those who rushed in recently. $AAVE The 80,000 defense battle turned into an "80,000 tug-of-war," the bulls' brothers are really tough. A giant whale secretly added funds at midnight, ETH is just a hotpot away from liquidation, and I can barely even play the role of the hype squad anymore.
Watching the market all morning, BTC mainly played a "low volume death feint," briefly dipping below 79,277 at midnight, with $812 million liquidated across the network in 24 hours, 213,000 people taken out. But it swung back to around 80,800 now, with a 24-hour change of 0.02%, basically a lonely game. The daily moving averages are bearish, the 1-hour EMA55 is pressing down at 81,203, and the rebound hasn't even touched the door.$ETH
ETH has even more drama. Last night it hit a low of 2,282, a certain giant whale's 115,000 ETH long position was only $30 away from liquidation, so at midnight they urgently added $9.21 million in margin, forcing the liquidation price down from 2,256 to 2,181. Currently holding $397 million in BTC+ETH longs, ETH's liquidation line is right underfoot. Another $214 million ETH long also added $5.67 million, with a liquidation price of 2,181.69. $BTC
Will ETH explode? Answer: It depends on how deep the whale's U is. The margin they added is enough to cycle through my account 800 times, I can barely even play the hype squad anymore.
For BTC, watch if 80,000 can hold and if EMA55 can close above; for ETH, watch if the "whale's lifeline" at 2,181 will be touched.
Don't ask about direction, just know the whales are holding, and we're watching. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Solana switched its consensus mechanism on the evening of 10-21, officially launching Alpenglow, reducing the finality target from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds. This is an upgrade on the chain.
In detail, out of 654 validators, 446 voted to approve the handover block, with a voting rate exceeding 98%. The entire handover process took about 900 milliseconds. The new admission ticket mechanism charges a fixed 0.8 SOL per epoch, replacing the previous voting transaction fee of about 1 SOL per epoch. Validators who cannot pay will be excluded from participation in the next epoch. The Firedancer and Frankendancer clients do not yet support migration this time.
The upgrade's effect is real; exchanges and merchants confirm that a transfer now takes 0.2 seconds instead of waiting 12.8 seconds. However, $SOL dropped from 106.97 at the close on 10-21 to a low of 98.62 intraday on 10-24, a decline of 8 points. This on-chain upgrade did not reflect in the price at all.
The technical upgrade improves the efficiency of market making and settlement; the valuation of SOL itself is not governed by this. Pricing is still determined by liquidity and positions, the old variables. Until positions and stop-losses are clear, the upgrade alone cannot support heavy holdings.
Whether the upgrade can deliver going forward depends on whether real activity on the chain picks up. The prices from 10-21 to 10-24 are determined by capital and positions.#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ FOMC meeting is approaching! The macro window opens, and bullish and bearish funds have already diverged in advance
The Fed's FOMC meeting countdown begins, with the market generally expecting the interest rate to remain unchanged this time
▪ BTC: The market anchor asset, focus on tracking the linkage reaction between the US dollar and US Treasury yields
▪ ETH: A follower asset, once it weakens, volatility and decline are more likely to amplify
▪ SOL: A highly elastic asset, beware of concentrated liquidation around the decision
Timeline (Beijing Time)
✅ 10.29 02:00｜FOMC interest rate decision
✅ 10.29 02:30｜Fed press conference, focus on inflation statements and future policy guidance
✅ 10.29 20:30｜US GDP preliminary, initial jobless claims, and September core PCE data released simultaneously
Current fund status
✅ BTC｜Current price 80911.5, increase +0.09%
Long: 1.41 billion, 52.76%｜Short: 1.26 billion, 47.24%
✅ ETH｜Current price 2367.4, increase +0.34%
Long: 1.18 billion, 49.84%｜Short: 1.19 billion, 50.16%
✅ SOL｜Current price 102.69, increase +0.24%
Long: 180 million, 46.48%｜Short: 200 million, 53.52% $HYPE first dropped to about 74.5 over the weekend before pulling back to 76.8, leaning bullish and more like a stop-loss sweep and stabilization rather than a narrative reversal to bearish.
24h around −0.6%, high/low about 77.2/74.5. On-chain: HYPE perpetual daily nominal about 400 million U, OI about 1.6 billion U; protocol perpetual total about 4.55 billion, TVL about 8.2 billion. Buyback rhythm is ongoing — aid fund on 10/24 bought about 18,700 coins/~1.41 million U, holdings about 48.25 million coins; October revenue so far about 52.08 million, daily pace still aiming for the 60 million threshold.
Before FOMC, will you wait to break above 80 first, or continue to range between 74–78? Feel free to criticize.
$HYPE
Just personal observation, not investment advice. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $HYPE CZ said yesterday in a PIVOT interview that agents won't use bank accounts for payments and receipts, but will use cryptocurrency.
The day before yesterday, HSBC's Hong Kong dollar stablecoin RedCoin launched on PayMe, and the official website shows about 80.81 million HKD in circulation today.
It runs on HSBC's own DLT network, and wallets on PayMe and the HSBC App cannot transfer between each other.
Both are stablecoins, one accessible to anyone on a public chain, the other on a bank ledger. Which one agents use depends on the access threshold. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？