Orbit Post Sitemap
Japan is going to raise interest rates.
This December, the central bank and the US will act together.
Crypto community veterans should remember this script:
People borrowing yen to trade crypto are everywhere in the world.
Once Japan raises rates, borrowing costs rise, and they can only sell crypto to repay debts.
That's how July 2024 came about.
Bitcoin dropped from 70,000 to 49,000.
Will it repeat this time?
Two variables:
1. The US also raises rates in the same month, so the interest rate gap doesn't widen, halving the damage
2. The crypto price itself is uncooperative, at 81,000, it failed twice to break through 84,000
My stance:
These two events at the end of the year are minefields.
The mines might not explode, but no one will add positions in a minefield.
Don't get carried away in the short term; watch the Bank of Japan's statement on October 30.
If it really crashes, don't panic; it's still not the time to pick up chips.
#Bitcoin #BTCAlthough $SNDK has not looked promising recently, you really need to think carefully if you plan to short at this position.
After the US stock market opened with some volatility last night, it rallied by several dozen points, then kept falling, hitting a low of 1225. Now the price is slowly declining around 1288.
First, calculate your profit if you short; is the risk-reward ratio really worth it?
There is strong support below at 1215. On the 18th, there was a spike down to this level, and last night's drop didn't break it, so it can be considered a recent iron bottom. Unless the Korean stock market continues to crash or the storage sector suffers a major sell-off, without significant negative news, I think it will be hard to break through in the next few days. From 1288 down to 1215, you have at most just over 5 points of profit margin.
Let's calculate the risk-reward ratio for this trade.
First, 1215 is a strong support level confirmed multiple times, with a large accumulation of bottom-fishing buy orders and short covering. If you chase shorts at this level, you might just short at the point where short momentum is exhausted.
Second, from 1288 to 1300, even up to 1350, there is a lot of trapped positions and resistance from rebounds. If there is any slight positive news or the US market opens with a small rally, the price could rebound directly, and you might lose those 5 points within minutes or even get stuck halfway up the mountain.
There is no volume surge; the price is just slowly grinding down. This kind of movement easily traps short sellers, then the main force suddenly hits a big bullish candle, wiping out your stop loss. The fact that 1225 was not broken last night already shows strong support below. The bears want to push down but lack the strength. $BTC $ETH $SNDK pullback is about to end! The last round of decline will finish, then it will rise again! Public layout!
Why wait for 1166? The reasons are as follows:
First, risk-reward ratio. Entering now at 1278, the resistance above from 1300 to 1366 is all trapped positions, so the upside space is limited; if the stop loss is set at 1080, the risk is nearly 200 points. But waiting for the drop to 1166, which is a previous strong chip concentration area with a very clear defense line, setting stop loss at 1080 only bears a risk of over 80 points to aim for 200 points profit, this calculation makes sense.
Second, technical demand. This wave surged over 100 points rapidly from the bottom, short-term indicators are already overbought, profit-taking could dump anytime. 1278 is most likely just an intermediate rebound; it must retest a second time to wash out floating chips.
Third, fundamental logic. The AI demand for storage chips hasn't collapsed, long-term agreements remain, this drop is a misvaluation caused by the overall tech stock sell-off in the US market. 1166 is the golden pit after emotional selling exhaustion and squeezing out liquidity; buying more here has the greatest chance of winning.
My execution discipline is very strict: place orders near 1166 to enter, stop loss unconditionally at 1080, if it breaks down effectively, admit defeat immediately. The first target is 1260, if broken through, look at 1366. At 1260, close half the position to withdraw principal, let the rest run for profit. For every 50 points price increase, raise the stop loss by 30 points to tightly lock in profits. #SanDiskMSCIRebalancingEffective, NAND valuation under focus #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ Q3 profits are still mainly driven by HBM3E+ and price increases in general DRAM; HBM4 has limited impact on this quarter's boost, being more of an expected theme rather than a current earnings engine, with real volume contribution expected in Q4 and beyond.
• ✅Positive: HBM4 unit price is significantly higher than HBM3E, with a gross margin over 70%, and has already secured long-term contracts with top customers; spot price increases in storage combined with rising server DRAM shipments provide a strong profit floor.
• ⚠️Pressure: Nvidia's new GPU delay and slow certification tuning result in low HBM4 shipments in Q3, yield ramp-up and TSMC base die outsourcing increase costs; Samsung is catching up on HBM4, putting pressure on market share and pricing.
• 📌Key financial report focus on 3 indicators: overall HBM revenue share, HBM4 shipment guidance, and average HBM price; an upward revision of HBM4 guidance would be a positive surprise signal.
In short: Q3 relies on old products to benefit from the cycle, HBM4 is an option, not current profit.Wall Street has officially given $BTC a "ten-year return range" for the first time, marking another step toward institutionalization.
Hard data: JPMorgan Asset Management's 2027 "Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions" includes Bitcoin for the first time, with a baseline annualized compound return of about 10%, higher than its assumptions for the US stock market at about 7.5% and gold at about 5.5%; volatility assumption is about 55%. Bull market scenario is about 16.6%, bear market scenario is an annualized loss just over 10%; the report still does not include BTC in the main covariance matrix, positioning it more as a speculative hedge.
A ten-year baseline of 10%, do you think this is conservative or already optimistic? #摩根大通首次将比特币纳入长期收益预测 $BTC $PEPE over 50x, entry at 0.000004931, target at 0.000005051, floating profit 121.67%. The chart shows a typical "sharp drop—stabilization—slight rise," with many spikes and a lack of smoothness. This is not a consensus-driven buy but someone bottom-fishing for bargains. There is selling pressure above 0.0000051, and 0.0000052 is the next hurdle.
I have a bad habit when trading: the bigger the floating profit, the more I treat myself as a coward. I won’t add to this position; I’ll take half the profit first and push the rest to breakeven with zero risk. If it hits 0.0000052, I’ll take it; if not, I’ll exit.
If it falls back to 0.0000049 near cost, I’ll admit the mistake and won’t stubbornly hold. Sideways consolidation after a 50x gain shakes out more people than a rise; taking profit is real money. $ETH $BTC
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ $MU playing like this tonight!
What's the plan for tonight? The stocks in the same sector have long been tied together in the big picture, don't expect it to have an independent run. If there is really strong capital pulling, $SKHYNIX and $SNDK will move along too. The market is stuck around 872, just hitting the 30-day moving average resistance. Plus, this round of storage price hikes is all concentrated on high-end HBM products, while the general consumer side underneath is actually very weak, spot prices can't even rise, so my overall trend bias remains bearish.
Micron is currently around 866, open short directly here. If the US stock market rebounds, add to the position. Stop loss strictly above 900, take profit first targets 855, if it really breaks down, look at 830.
If you want to double your position before the New Year, weigh it yourself, just stick to the circle you trust and follow closely! $SNDK $SKHYNIX #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ BTC $80,000 Defense Battle, This Time It's a Bit Different,
BTC briefly dipped below $81,000 intraday, hitting a low of $80,961, then barely recovered to around $82,000, with a 24-hour decline still around 1%. On the surface, it looks like a routine pullback, but breaking down the details, something feels off.
The trigger is the Middle East. Reports revealed that the US and Israel plan to take action against Iran after the midterm elections, pushing Brent crude oil prices directly above $110, instantly sparking inflation expectations. Risk assets collectively took a hit; the Nasdaq fell 2.6% the previous night, and BTC’s drop is justified. But what really raises caution is the funding side: Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $635 million yesterday, the largest single-day outflow since June, with BlackRock’s IBIT alone withdrawing $254 million. Meanwhile, a certain whale deposited 4,000 BTC worth $327 million to Binance and Deribit over the past 5 hours. ETFs are withdrawing, whales are moving coins to exchanges; these two events combined strongly suggest short-term selling pressure.
My personal view leans defensive. The $80,000 level is widely regarded as the average institutional cost basis; as long as it doesn’t break down effectively, the structure remains intact. But with ETF outflows happening so fast, even if it holds, it only means "not worse," not a sign of strengthening. Next, watch two things: the daily close at $80,000 and whether ETF outflows are a one-day purge or a sustained trend. The former determines sentiment, the latter determines direction. $BTC $ETH $XAUT This wave of SanDisk (SNDK) sell-off is indeed quite brutal, closing near 1260 on Thursday, dropping over 8% in a single day, with intraday volatility also quite scary. The article is right, this is not just a problem with SanDisk alone, but the entire storage sector (Micron, Western Digital all dropped together) was collectively hammered by funds, compounded by the Nasdaq dropping 2.6% that day, renewed doubts about the sustainability of AI spending, plus the exaggerated hype over Changxin's slight DRAM progress. Naturally, the highly elastic storage stocks took the first hit.
The fundamentals haven't actually collapsed yet. Data center demand is still consuming NAND, prices and gross margins were previously ridiculously high, and company guidance remains strong. Most analyst target prices are still above 2000. Western Digital just reported earnings that beat expectations, yet it was still hammered, a typical "sell the good news" scenario. The market is now more concerned about whether the cycle has peaked and if AI capital expenditures will slow down, rather than single-quarter numbers.
In the short term, I agree with the teacher's view: this is now the emotional recovery phase after being hurt, so don't rush to bottom-fish for a rebound. Before the sector truly warms up, it’s easy to get hit repeatedly. With the Nasdaq and peers like Micron and Western Digital unstable, it’s hard for SanDisk to strengthen independently. There was a bit of a rebound pre-market today, but the strength still depends on whether it can hold after the open.
Going forward, focus on two things: first, its own earnings report on the 29th, whether it can continue to provide strong guidance and dispel expectations of a "cycle peak"; second, the capital flow in the Nasdaq and the entire storage sector. The story is still ongoing, but the window for profit-taking has indeed opened. You can lay low with a small position to observe; rushing to go all-in to bet on a rebound carries significant risk.
Friends, what do you think?#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings My view on SK hynix Q3: HBM4 demand from AI inference is a real tailwind, but a lot of the optimism looks priced in already. The guidance and HBM4 commentary will matter more than the headline numbers. Not financial advice.Oh my god, what's going on? Sisters, this coin is really fierce, it surged 90% in one day. As soon as I saw it, I immediately shorted it, but I got trapped right after entering!
Look at this damn $IRYS, it skyrocketed 90% in one day! I thought it was definitely the whales pumping to dump, so I impulsively shorted at 0.04137. But I got trapped right after entering, now it’s up to 0.04212, floating loss -5.43%! This demon coin doesn’t play by the rules at all!
But I dug into it carefully, this surge is all a scheme! There’s no new positive news, it’s purely capital rotation; although the trading volume looks like $150 million, the authenticity score is only 14/100, most of it is wash trading and matched orders; the main driving force is retail investors from Korea’s Upbit, plus its small market cap and very thin order book, even a little buying pressure can push it flying.
This kind of capital pool with no fundamental support, relying entirely on wash trading and retail sentiment to pump, once the buying pressure can’t keep up, the drop will definitely be faster than anyone else.
This time I’m definitely not stubbornly holding on. The stop loss is already set, if it keeps mindlessly surging, I’ll admit defeat and leave.
$BTC $ETH #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Holding Yes on HOOD beating earnings. Trading volumes and crypto activity have been strong this quarter, and the market is pricing a beat at 74%. Small position, just sharing my view. #HOOD #EarningsSeasonBTC at 81,000, ETH dropped 2,400, and over 100 million is still buried below 80,000
This round isn't a problem within the crypto circle itself; Wall Street is dragging it down.
Last night, the Nasdaq fell 2.6%. Panic over AI spending spread, leading to indiscriminate sell-offs in tech stocks; Brent crude in the Middle East surged 4% to 114, and safe-haven funds all fled to government bonds. Risk assets got hit from all sides: BTC dropped from 84,000 to 81,000, ETH lost 2,400 directly, altcoins fell even worse, with over 400 million USD liquidated in 24 hours, 70% of which were long positions.
But what I'm watching isn't the current moment, it's the orders beneath the market.
Below the $BTC 80,000 round number, positions at 79,866, 80,070, and 79,049 have over 100 million USD in long orders stacked. If it really hits 80,000, these stop losses will likely trigger en masse, potentially pushing prices down to 79,000 or 78,000.
$ETH is even more fragile; if it can't reclaim 2,400, there’s another row of orders at 2,339 and 2,309 below.
There's an abnormal signal to mention: the BTC spot ETF attracted 528 million USD yesterday against the trend. Someone is buying on the spot side, but longs on the contract side are still being liquidated. The two sides are fighting, indicating volatility is far from over.
Tonight we have US manufacturing data, and next Tuesday the FOMC meeting. Any rebound before then I consider weak. If 80,000 doesn't hold, don't rush to bottom-fish. I have been watching OKEx BTC all day, from 1 AM until now, twenty hours, fluctuating back and forth within the 81,000 to 82,000 range, this 1,000 range. If we say it has stabilized, then it has stabilized.
But the price isn't moving, perpetual positions keep increasing, with about 800 more longs in the same segment, now totaling 31,600 contracts.
At first, I also thought that after the ETF ran, someone was buying spot at the bottom. Checking the positions, the long accounts are still more than twice the shorts, but the top 5% of large holders are slightly bearish based on position size.
So this 1,000 range box is formed by both sides of the contract pushing positions into it; I haven't seen spot supporting it underneath. The more positions piled up, the more violent the breakout will be, but I won't guess which direction.
If by this time tomorrow night OKEx BTC is still stuck within this 1,000 range and positions haven't dropped, then this theory would mean I was wrong. #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ $BTC dominance is 59.4%, the entire market fell 2.63% in 24 hours, Bitcoin held its ground, and all the gains are in the fringes. Looking at these sectors together, they form the same trend: new launch platforms plus meme. Kaito's Launchpad, wallet IDO, and frog-themed projects all rely on attention and new issuances to push prices. USDT market cap dropped 0.09% in 24 hours, with no new money off-exchange. Dominance remains high, and funds haven't moved into altcoins. This is small capital within the existing pool moving back and forth among several hotspots. Fear and greed index fell from 63 a week ago to 50, indicating cooling sentiment. This round is a stock game with poor sustainability. The end signals to watch are twofold: the Launchpad and IDO sectors turning negative in 24-hour gains, while dominance continues to rise, with money flowing back to $BTC, causing small caps to retreat together. Conversely, if USDT market cap turns to expansion and dominance declines, that would indicate new money entering the market and rotation potentially spreading.A single-day outflow of over $600 million looks glaring, but it seems more like "a week's inflows being digested," not yet a trend reversal to bearish.
Hard data: The US spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net outflow of about $635.6 million on Thursday, the largest single-day outflow since June; IBIT led the decline with about $254.1 million, FBTC about $217.5 million, and ARKB about $109.4 million. However, the week still recorded a net inflow of about $440 million, with the first three days totaling approximately $1.08 billion in inflows. BTC's current price is fluctuating around 81,000, with US tech stocks and AI spending concerns simultaneously suppressing risk appetite.
Do you trust the resilience of "weekly net inflows still positive," or see the "large single-day outflow" as a top signal? #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ $BTC 📉 The market is stagnant with slight ripples, so why did IRYS surge 100%?
BTC is around 81600. Before the FOMC, volume is extremely low, ETF funds are cautious, and big money is hesitant to act rashly, making the market look like dead water. If the macro environment doesn't materialize, BTC will likely continue to oscillate narrowly.
IRYS is the wildest performer today. It surged over 100% in 24 hours, topping the charts. The catalyst was South Korea's Upbit announcing its listing, triggering a flood of capital and crushing the shorts (liquidations were brutal). This is purely a liquidity play driven by Korean retail buying combined with short squeeze; the project itself has no major announcements, so don't mistake a short squeeze for value investing.
PEPE sentiment is warming up. Without any exclusive positive news, this is purely hot money rotating from mainstream coins to MEME and altcoins. If the market continues sideways, such localized groupings will repeatedly appear.
Trading insight: When the market is sideways, don't just stare at the candlesticks; watch where the money is going. Vertical surges like IRYS combined with upcoming token unlocks mean chasing now is like catching a flying knife. Better to miss out than to make a mistake.
This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice. #10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？ #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC $IRYS $PEPE $ONDO
Underlying assets are stable, so why does the token still have high volatility?
In this morning's spot snapshot, ONDO's 24-hour price change was -6.65%, ranging from 0.4213 to 0.4621 USDT.
The token is not an automatic reflection of the underlying product's earnings. If there is no direct link between asset management scale, product revenue, and token equity, the market will still assign high elasticity based on risk preference.
If verifiable equity allows business growth to convert into sustained demand, the valuation can be revised upward; if product growth and token holder returns remain continuously disconnected, the narrative premium should be reduced.📉 The US market opens in half an hour, BTC hasn't moved more than 1.4% in 22 hours
Let's reconcile first. Last night, "If it stands back at 82,500, I'll admit I'm wrong" was not broken, the high was 82,095.2; the later target of 81,000 was also not reached, the low was 80,924.9, off by 75, half wrong.
This morning, "Touching 80,000 at 20:00" was also wrong, after the release the low was 81,245.7, off by 1,246. The 18:00 mark using the previous night's 80,924.9 as reference is off by 925, also wrong.
Today BTC +0.04%, trading volume -24.82%.
Open interest reached a new high from 3.06 million to 3.155 million contracts; funding rate settled at 0.00669%, next period set at 0.01000%.
In one hour, the entire market only exploded 2.77 million. No one is closing or adding positions, bulls are paying the original price — this is not bottom grinding, it's idle trading.
The driving force can only come from outside. Yesterday's US market already gave half the answer: the largest single trade in 24 hours was not BTC, but a SOXL long position of 4.3379 million.
US tech stocks are all green, energy storage is rising against the trend — money is moving from downstream to upstream.
Prediction: Tonight at 00:00, BTC funding rate settlement will break 0.008%, if it is ≥0.008%, I'll admit I'm wrong.
When the price doesn't move, the funding rate is the only number still speaking.
Do you think we are waiting for the US market, or is no one left?
$BTC #ETF single-day outflow exceeds $600 million, can BTC stabilize?
This does not constitute investment advice. No stream today, so I’ll leave you with this 👇
$BTC is sitting at the 8.4th percentile of its 17-year power-law trend (log-log straight line).
$XAU is at the 93.5th percentile of its 56-year exponential trend (log-linear straight line).
📊 Which one will hit a new all-time high (100th percentile) first — Bitcoin or Gold? 👀
#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings $FIL Why did it drop, have you understood? The daily ascending channel has already been broken, the daily chart looks very, very bad. I don't know if it's intentional by the whales or if they really finished unloading around 1.2. Anyway, my strategy is to liquidate my spot position as soon as it breaks 1, regardless of missing out or whatever. The daily chart is clearly performing poorly and looks ugly already. Of course, I'm not telling you to short it, I'm just saying its daily chart has deter#存储芯片股再度下跌，AI投资回报担忧加剧
Brothers, memory chip stocks have crashed again. SanDisk and Micron have fallen one after another, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index is under pressure again.
Why the drop? It's not that AI has no demand, but the market is starting to "settle accounts." Tech giants are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into capital expenditures, but monetization on the application side is too slow. The 10-year US Treasury yield is approaching 5%, and capital simply has no patience to wait for long-term promises. Previously, "building computing power and buying chips" was enough to pay the bill; now they only ask, "Where is the profit?" Institutions have started ruthlessly cutting valuations.
BTC, as a high Beta asset, is also suffering. After falling below 82,000, it failed to recover and is now hovering around 81,700, down more than 3% in 24 hours, with over 100,000 liquidations. High interest rates combined with tech stock risk aversion have severely suppressed risk appetite.
Key levels to watch: Support below at 81,300, break to look at 80,000; resistance above at 82,100-82,500.
Two sentences for trading: If you have a position, set a stop loss below 81,000, don't stubbornly hold on; if you are empty-handed, control your hands, don't catch a falling knife, wait for a pullback to 81,300 with shrinking volume to stabilize or to stand back above 82,100 before considering the right side. The AI bubble is not yet squeezed out, and BTC is unlikely to improve in the short term. What do you think? Let's chat in the comments. $BTC $ETH $ZEC Stock tokens are not stocks, don't to see it as a positive. Stock original rule states: Only using own funds to make markets in the pool means no need to register as a market maker. How is this calculated: what is saved is the registration threshold, not the disclosure and record-keeping. Previously, such institutions couldn't enter because of licensing restrictions. Now the threshold is lowered, and what comes in is own funds. The pool uses a pool-building model, not order queueing; depth depNominally $2.07 billion, longs only account for about 1%.
Hyperliquid position snapshot (around 17:40): Tracking 16 large accounts with a total of 494 positions, nominal entry about $2.07 billion, longs about 1%; the largest single position is a short ETH position of about $247.3 million, with an unrealized loss of about $7.6 million, and the portfolio's unrealized P&L is about −$20.8 million. At the time of writing, ETH is about 2396, BTC about 81627.
What worries me more is: large accounts are almost all short stacked near 2400, once the direction rebounds, the short squeeze could be very sharp.
Are you betting they will continue to add short ETH, or preparing for a short squeeze first?
I will continue to analyze as these large accounts' positions change, stay tuned so you don't miss out.
$ETH Risk appetite is contracting; this time the crypto sector is not the main player
Overnight, U.S. stocks weakened, with the tech sector leading the decline. Funds moved from overvalued assets toward defensive ones, and discussions about AI capital expenditure returns have reignited. As risk appetite contracts, the crypto market is under pressure, but this downturn did not originate in the crypto sector.
$BTC fell from above 84,800 to around 81,400, hitting a daily low of 80,935. ETFs saw a net outflow of $635 million in one day, with IBIT alone accounting for $254 million, wiping out the $1.08 billion inflow from the previous three days. 80,000 is the next consolidation zone to watch, having previously served as a support level multiple times.
$ETH dipped to 2,358.99 before recovering to around 2,400, precisely at the 100-day EMA. About 36% of circulating supply is staked, and exchange reserves continue to decline; however, ETFs still had a net outflow of $110 million yesterday, with BlackRock's ETHA alone accounting for $75.5 million. Supply is locked, demand is withdrawing.
$SOL is around 104; after the Alpenglow upgrade was realized, it actually dropped 5.2%, reflecting a "sell the news" reaction. ETF net outflow was $8.515 million, a small scale, but given the simultaneous bleeding in the other two, there is no foundation for an independent rally.
In short: today's main bearish driver is the contraction of risk appetite, with the three coins merely different points along the same transmission chain bearing the pressure.
This is only a market record and does not constitute investment advice.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #闪迪存储业务高增长能否延续？
UNITREE contract surged 21% in 24 hours, a short squeeze is happening on-chain, but I’m not chasing either long or short at this level.
First, clarify that UNITREE is not a coin issued by Yushu; it’s a synthetic perpetual contract tracking the A-share Yushu Technology 688836, open 24 hours, with no equity.
Today, A-share Yushu hit the 20cm daily limit up, closing at 624 yuan, and the contract followed from 74 to 93.5, up about 50% in 5 days.
I think this wave is a short squeeze: many people are adding high-leverage shorts on-chain, funding rates dropped to -1%, shorts pay heavy rent daily, and when A-shares hit the limit up, it triggered a chain of liquidations.
The problem is A-share PE is already over 400 times, with earnings report on October 29, valuation is all about expectations.
Chasing longs, I fear the good news is fully priced; shorting, the -1% funding rate and the short squeeze can grind you down, neither side is comfortable.
I’m just waiting for levels: lightly long if volume holds above 94.2, targeting 100; also can try if it pulls back and stabilizes around the 82 platform.
If it breaks below today’s low of 74.2, the short squeeze dies out, bulls are invalidated.
Very small position, don’t naked short at the peak of the short squeeze.
Are you betting the robot short squeeze continues until the earnings report, or do you think the limit up is the top?
$UNITREE
#宇树科技 #合约 After SpaceX went public, Musk's assets integration advanced to the equity level. On October 21, Musk confirmed that Tesla and SpaceX each set up independent special boards to evaluate the merger; he recused himself due to conflicts of interest. The intersection of chips, robotics, and orbital data centers forms the industrial logic. In June, SpaceX IPO'd at $135 per share, while Morningstar's fair value was only $63 per share, about 53% below the pricing. Tesla shareholders may demand 50%-66% equity in the merged company.
Tesla's approval threshold requires 50% of all issued shares to vote in favor; abstentions count as opposition, not a simple majority of voting shares. SpaceX's Q3 revenue was $14.58 billion, net profit $4.4 billion, capital expenditure $19.6 billion. The core conflict lies in valuation discount and financing responsibility. $BTC $ETH #SpaceX业绩大增，与特斯拉合并能否推进？ Meta has posted a $825 billion bill, causing a double hit to both stocks and bonds in the market.
Regulatory filings submitted by Meta on Thursday reveal future commitments for various leases and contracts totaling about $825 billion, up from $700 billion three months ago.
This consists of three parts: $355.7 billion in operating leases not yet recorded on the balance sheet (data centers and energy infrastructure), $454.5 billion in irrevocable short- and long-term contracts, and $14.7 billion in cloud computing purchase obligations over the next five years.
On Thursday, Meta closed down 6.98% at $648.85. Even harsher was the credit market: Meta’s five-year CDS rose to about 114.79 basis points, a record high. CDS for Oracle, Microsoft, and Broadcom also increased.
I think what’s really being hit isn’t Q3 advertising—advertising actually exceeded expectations—but the "bill" itself: the market is starting to price credit risk on the ledger of AI-fueled borrowing. Observing, not chasing.
Invalidation point: If Meta clearly lowers its capital expenditure cap for 2027, or if CDS falls back and the stock price rallies above $697 with volume, this judgment is void.
Which side do you favor: Is the $825 billion the entry ticket to the AI supercycle, or will the growing ledger eventually blow up?
$META $ORCL $MSFT
#Meta #AIInfrastructure#SK Hynix Q3 earnings report is coming, can HBM4 boost profitability? BlackRock transferring coins again? Bulls stop fantasizing! $BTC $ETH firmly bearish!
In just one or two hours, BlackRock moved 3,215 BTC, equivalent to $262 million, from ETF custody cold storage to Coinbase Prime's tradable hot wallet in one go, plus two additional transfers of 300 BTC each simultaneously.
This is not an ordinary account relocation; it signals institutional selling pressure chips being positioned in advance. Looking at the market, after BTC dropped from 84,898, this rebound had no incremental funds entering throughout, and every rally lacked follow-through; ETH's trend is even weaker, with highs continuously declining, and the rebound is purely a false recovery caused by trapped holders escaping.
This current position is a downtrend continuation window for shorts to enter. Many people rush to bottom-fish after seeing a significant drop, but essentially they are catching a falling knife against the trend. Institutions have already prepared chips, and as soon as the redemption wave intensifies, selling pressure can crash down at any time.
No hesitation on direction, mainly short with the trend!
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Ethereum's new moves in October. The upgrade brake and market pullback introduction are happening this week, and Ethereum did something very "Ethereum-style": at the last moment on the testnet activation, it pressed the pause button on the upgrade. The Glamsterdam upgrade, originally scheduled to activate on the Hoodi testnet on October 26, was postponed by the Ethereum Foundation (EF) on October 22 after a security audit company found that the new proposal might affect already deployed contracts, with no new date announced. Meanwhile, ETH hovers around $2,400—more than 40% down from the approximately $4,248 high in the past 12 months. Technical upgrade brakes, price pullbacks, and significant ETF fund outflows—all three happened simultaneously in October. This article explains their origins, the essence of the controversy, and follow-up points clearly in one go. 01 What happened: an upgrade stopped at the last stage Ethereum's upgrade pace has been tight since 2024: Dencun, Pectra, Fusaka launched consecutively. Glamsterdam is the next major event—it plans to raise the block gas limit from 30 million to 200 million (about 3.3 times), introduce built-in proposer-builder separation (ePBS), and add block-level access lists. According to the process, Glamsterdam needs to run smoothly on testnets like Sepolia and Hoodi before going live on the mainnet. Sepo$LIT Review of LIT's price movement: Recently, the overall trend met expectations, with the yellow line completing a cycle. Currently, technically, it is a pullback after a double top, continuing to probe down after hitting 3.961, stabilizing at the 3.143 support. It may further move down to the 2.615 and 1.995 levels. Fundamentally, there has been a breakthrough recently: In November, it plans to submit DCM and DCO license applications to the US CFTC, aiming to be the first approved on-chain perpetual DEX; Q3 total trading volume was about $137.67 billion, with open interest doubling quarter-on-quarter to over $1.64 billion. However, unlocking pressure is gradually increasing, and Hyperliquid's competitive advantage remains evident. Short-term catalysts exist, but long-term focus should be on license progress and whether trading volume can be maintained. This coin deserves close attention. #Robinhood交易业务增长能否延续？ Viewpoint: Robinhood (HOOD) Q3 focus is on "activity," more so on "monetization of new business"
The market is focused on trading activity in the October 27 earnings report, but HOOD's growth logic goes beyond "zero-commission stock trading." Q2 revenue increased by 32%, with net inflows of $22 billion as a foundation, showing strong fundamentals. This quarter's core validation points are:
1. Trading momentum: whether stock and crypto volatility can continue to drive core trading revenue;
2. Incremental breakthrough: whether options, gold subscriptions, and new crypto businesses can take over, hedging against the cyclicality of pure trading fees.
Short-term fluctuations are inevitable, but in the long term, it is shifting from a "trading channel" to a "comprehensive financial ecosystem." If new business contributions exceed expectations, the earnings report will confirm its platform-based revaluation logic. #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？
The release of SK Hynix's Q3 earnings report on October 28 is approaching, and the market is quite divided.
The market expects Q3 operating profit to reach 76–78 trillion KRW, aiming for a record high, and the reported figures look very impressive.
But there is a hidden risk that cannot be ignored: the ramp-up of HBM4 volume is slower than initially expected, and Samsung is catching up in the HBM market share, increasing competitive pressure.
It is very likely that a scenario will occur where the earnings numbers meet expectations, but the growth story falls short of investors' hopes — in other words, "good data, shaky narrative."
If that happens, prices may easily turn neutral or even weaken afterward, so blindly chasing highs is not advisable.
The AI storage sector is very hot, so the risk of positive news being priced in early must be watched carefully; manage your own profit and loss.#SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ HBM4 is expected to boost profit forecasts, but the Q3 earnings report itself is more like a "high-level confirmation" rather than an "unexpected surprise." The real focus is not on the single-quarter profit figures, but on the ramp-up pace of HBM4, gross margin resilience, and order visibility for 2027.
1. Q3 Performance Expectations: Record-breaking with little doubt
Market consensus (FnGuide standard):
• Revenue around 98-101 trillion KRW, quarter-on-quarter +24%~28%
• Operating profit around 76.9-77 trillion KRW, with some institutions (Citibank, Meritz) expecting 80-81 trillion KRW
• Operating margin about 78%, approaching the rare 80% threshold in manufacturing
The Q2 operating profit of 60.5 trillion KRW was already a historic high; the core logic for another jump in Q3 is:
• DRAM average price up over 20% quarter-on-quarter (Meritz estimates 22%, Citibank estimates 28%)
• NAND average price up 15-24% quarter-on-quarter, driven by enterprise eSSD
• HBM4 begins to confirm scale revenue, raising the overall product mix
2. How much does HBM4 actually contribute? This is the biggest point of divergence in this earnings report
Optimists: The 12-layer HBM4 started mass production for Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform in July 2026, began ramping up in September, and revenue started to show in Q3; 2026-2027 capacity is already booked. #SpaceX #USPreMarket
Looking through the pre-market leaderboard, the most interesting thing is a pair moving in opposite directions: AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon down 3.6%–4.3%, tower stocks Crown Castle +7.6%, American Tower +5.5%.
The reason is Bloomberg said SpaceX is negotiating to lease 80,000 US base stations, aiming to form the fourth nationwide carrier. Also, PhillipCapital upgraded $SPCX from sell straight to buy, raising the target price from 75 to 250.
Binance SPCX perpetual is now around 148, yesterday it dropped to a low of 143.8, this is my first line tonight; above 156 is yesterday's starting point, if it can't break through, it will remain volatile.
Market opens at 21:30, PMI at 21:45. Bloomberg only said "in talks," not signed, don't treat rumors as facts.
Do you think telecom stocks are overreacting, or can the fourth carrier really succeed?
Personal opinion, not investment advice $ETH $BTC The recent market has been consolidating sideways and quite sluggish. What is causing this? Honestly, BTC is really strong. You can see that the Nasdaq has dropped nearly 10%, but BTC only fell 3%, indicating very strong support. Even with continuous outflows from spot ETFs and institutions selling off, it still hasn't broken the 80,000 level.
Looking at the market, after every rally, there is a 1-3 month consolidation before another rally. Honestly, the current market is influenced by the US stock market. Once the US stocks stabilize, a new round of rally will start again. Plus, the Middle East situation remains tense. In just three months, crude oil ($CL) has surged straight from 67 to a peak of 106. I think this recent pullback is a good opportunity to buy the dip. That's it.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Stock tokens are coming, and the pool is planned to be set up on the chain where $OKB is located. The original rule states: Only using own funds to make markets in the pool means no need to register as a market maker. How is this calculated: what is saved is the registration threshold, not the disclosure and record-keeping. Previously, such institutions couldn't enter because of licensing restrictions. Now the threshold is lowered, and what comes in is own funds. The pool uses a pool-building mo#SKhynixQ3HBM4Earnings most important earnings of this cycle.
Consensus: ∼77T won operating profit, revenue ∼98T won - up 578% YoY. Record quarter incoming.
But twist: Samsung just overtook SK Hynix in Q3 HBM revenue - $8.7B vs $7.6B per AllianceBernstein. SK Hynix HBM share dropped from 58% to 50% in Q2 due to HBM4 cert delays.
HBM4 is make or break. Q3 was transition quarter, Q4 is where HBM4 revenue ramps 3x. If they deliver on Oct 27 call, this dip is buy.
I'm long HBM leaders. You?BTC down 4%, meme down 5% — even those launching new coins are too lazy to release them.
When risk appetite contracts, the first to be cut are narratives without cash flow.
$PEPE 0.00000442, -5.6%, market cap 1.86 billion, 24h volume 290 million. Up 6.2% over 7 days, the only one among the three that hasn't performed poorly.
$PENGU 0.00774, -5.7%, market cap 490 million. SoFi just added it to their banking app on 10/19, but the positive news couldn't support the overall market.
$SHIB 0.00000499, -4.6%, market cap 2.91 billion, down 2.4% over 7 days, falling more gently than PEPE.
Together the three total 5.26 billion, not even a fraction of HYPE. Meme coins are not a safe haven in a crash, just falling more quietly.The most frustrating thing about playing Meme is that just when you finally understand the project introduction and are ready to enter, the early-stage tokens are already being sold off. @zerufinance released a new study today analyzing 3,374 token issuances. According to their sample statistics, only 34 naturally graduated, about 1.01%; 68.7% of developers started selling within five minutes after issuance. Note, this is the result of the study's sample and cannot be directly applied to all new coins. This data set makes me more concerned about one question: we usually spend a lot of time researching narratives but rarely study whose tokens we are actually buying when we enter. The same volume surge at opening could be due to independent buyers continuously entering or related wallets acquiring tokens early and then exiting collectively. The K-line charts may look similar, but the situations faced by participants are completely different. Developers selling tokens themselves cannot be directly equated with malicious intent; it also depends on the scale of selling, concentration of holdings, and how much selling pressure the pool can withstand. The value of ZeruAI’s wallet behavior analysis is quite concrete here: by looking at the source of funds, address associations, and exit behaviors together, it provides traders with more basis for judgment. In the future, when looking at a new listing, I will first ask: who holds the early-stage tokens? Have they started selling? After the hype dies down, who continues to trade? These questions are more worth spending time on than how many times the community shouts “strong community” in the group.#中东原油供应风险再起，油价持续走强 Bro, the data in this chart from last night really made me catch my breath.
The transport volume in the Persian Gulf and Hormuz Strait has actually recovered to 82% of pre-conflict levels, running 14 million barrels per day. Normally, with supply restored, oil prices should drop, right? But instead, Brent crude stubbornly broke through $114, hitting a new high in over five months.
Why? Because attacks on oil tankers are still happening. The market isn’t afraid of how much oil you’re shipping now; it’s afraid the supply could be cut off at any moment. Those extra tens of dollars are all geopolitical "panic premiums."
This transmission chain is like a dull knife cutting into our BTC. Oil prices stuck at $114 keep inflation expectations high. With inflation not coming down, the Fed’s door to rate cuts is welded shut. The 10-year US Treasury yield continues to suck blood at high levels, funds all flock to risk-free interest, so who’s left to play in crypto? BTC can’t break through the 80,000 mark no matter what, and the root cause is right here. $CL $BTC $TAO
AI asset decline, how can the computing power narrative break free from the price cycle?
In this morning's spot snapshot, TAO's 24-hour price change was -5.60%, ranging between 252.6 and 273.5 USDT.
Price pullbacks do not directly indicate a decline in network output, but if participation incentives mainly rely on token appreciation, it is easy to encounter a reverse cycle during downturns. What really needs to be verified is whether external payments cover the incentive costs.
If payment demand is sustained and costs are controllable, the valuation will have a more stable basis; if new participation only follows price fluctuations, the AI label cannot provide reliable support. 💥Now with the $UNITREE fee rate like this, can the shorts still hold on?
Brothers, this rally in Unitree is driven by industry catalysts igniting sentiment, the oversold condition providing resilience, and the upcoming earnings report giving funds a short-term reason to enter and speculate. Funds are rushing ahead to trade on expectations.
Unitree's first quarterly report after listing will be released on October 29, and the earnings surprise is the biggest powder keg. The A-share market has already surged over 46% this week, with a 20% daily limit locked at 624 yuan. I believe there is a high probability of profit-taking before the report on the 29th; sentiment has reached a point that needs digestion, but digestion does not mean a crash!
Currently, the worst off are not those who shorted at low levels, but those who saw the absurd negative fee rate, thought the crowded shorts would definitely collapse, and rushed in to add shorts. The more negative the fee rate, the higher the price rises—this is a hunt targeting the shorts! Shorts are still crowded and still losing money holding positions, so I choose to wait and see. Before the earnings report comes out, don't try to guess the top and short!
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ Before the US stock market opens, BTC is wildly testing around 81.7K. Does it look sleepy? Wake up first! Don't think that sideways trading means no action; actually, there are already strong currents beneath the surface. Moving recklessly now can easily get you hit from both sides.
$BTC current price is 81,700. After being slammed down to 80,900 in the early session, it barely pulled back. This is a typical case of dead calm with slight ripples. Looking at the 4-hour long-short ratio, it has surged to 2.29! The more BTC falls, the more aggressively retail investors buy the dip, but open interest is declining. This clearly shows retail investors are holding the bags while profit-taking and major players quietly retreat during the sideways movement.
Looking at $ETH now at 2,399, it is right stuck on the critical 2,400 lifeline. The data is even more worrying; the 4-hour long-short ratio has directly surged to 3.02! The screen is full of retail longs, but open interest is also shrinking. This script is too familiar—whales might use the US market open as an excuse to hammer down a spike, wiping out all the high leverage below 2,400.
Finally, $SOL is at 104.4, showing weakness. The 4-hour long-short ratio is also as high as 2.64. Retail investors are still stubbornly holding, with no short-term explosive momentum.
Summary: The market looks calm on the surface but is actually a powder keg. The bulls are too crowded, but new money is not entering. With the US market about to open, it is highly likely there will be a washout triggered by volatility. Wait for the leverage to blow out before making moves.
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？
#ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 U.S. stocks fell, and gold also dropped! Can the $4000 level still hold?
Spot gold fell to a low of $3986.49, then rebounded to around $4020. Domestic gold jewelry prices also dropped, with Chow Sang Sang cutting 30 yuan/gram in one day, and Lao Feng Xiang reducing 24 yuan/gram.
Why did gold $XAUT also fall when the stock market dropped?
There are three main reasons:
First, soaring oil prices push up inflation expectations, squeezing the Federal Reserve's room to cut rates, and even raising expectations of rate hikes.
Second, U.S. Treasury yields remain high. Gold does not generate interest, so the higher the interest rates, the higher the opportunity cost of holding gold, making some funds naturally prefer U.S. Treasuries.
Third, liquidity pressure. When the stock market plunges, leveraged funds need to meet margin calls and raise cash. Gold's good liquidity may make it a priority asset to sell. So-called safe haven does not mean gold always rises.
So, is $4000 the bottom?
I will focus on three signals: whether central bank gold purchases continue, whether futures long positions keep increasing, and when U.S. Treasury yields truly fall.
My judgment is: $4000 is worth close attention, but the round number should not be directly taken as the bottom. In the short term, gold is still affected by interest rates and liquidity. Whether it can rebound later depends on whether Fed expectations shift.
Do you think gold can hold $4000 this time, or will it continue to dip?
#10月FOMC临近，美联储暂停加息还有哪些变数？ #SK海力士Q3财报在即，HBM4能否提振盈利？ According to the current situation, there will basically be no major fluctuations before the earnings report is released. Looking at the current major bulls, they just take a quick taste and then leave.
Tone: AI high value-added storage demand is a structural trend, not a short-term pulse.
Risk warning: Ordinary consumer and PC storage demand is weak, relying entirely on AI computing power demand to support; HBM supply will gradually increase later, which will compress premiums in the long term.
✅ Positive logic: Continued HBM prosperity, leading profits explode, supporting the valuation floor of the storage sector.
⚠️ Negative risks: The market feedback at the time was that performance was strong but slightly below consensus expectations, so positive news is easily followed by a rise and fall; and the market has begun to trade on the expectation of "increased HBM supply and marginal decline in profit margins," which is also a major macro reason for the recent SNDK volatility and weakness. Stock tokens are coming, and the pool is planned to be set up on the chain where $OKB is located. The original rule states: Only using own funds to make markets in the pool means no need to register as a market maker. How is this calculated: what is saved is the registration threshold, not the disclosure and record-keeping. Previously, such institutions couldn't enter because of licensing restrictions. Now the threshold is lowered, and what comes in is own funds. The pool uses a pool-building moFull-line short pressure! Heavy short positions of big players exposed, BTC+ETH+SOL all showing unrealized losses
Hyperbot detected a heavyweight short position, with BTC, ETH, and SOL all simultaneously positioned short, currently all in unrealized loss status, with a very large scale.
📊 Complete position breakdown
✅ BTC short｜5X full position
Holding: -2637.95 BTC, position value 220 million U
Entry price: 76327.4 U
Unrealized P&L: -14.2095 million U
Funding income: +2.948 million U
Margin: 43.1116 million U, liquidation price: 152344.29 U
✅ ETH short｜5X full position
Holding: -106,500 ETH, position value 260 million U
Entry price: 2322.74 U
Unrealized P&L: -8.129 million U
Funding income: +4.1054 million U
Margin: 51.0863 million U, liquidation price: 4134.95 U
✅ SOL short｜7X full position
Holding: -722,100 SOL, position value 75.4412 million U
Entry price: 94.3199 U
Unrealized P&L: -7.3362 million U
Funding income: +3.7709 million U
Margin: 10.7773 million U, liquidation price: 356.37 U $IRYS Attention! The manipulator is about to make a move.
Those who rush in during the main upward wave will eventually become fuel.
On-chain observation shows that while IRYS was consolidating sideways, this address kept buying, driving the price steadily up and pushing it to the top of the gainers list with a 24-hour increase of 111%. It's hard not to get excited, but note that the same address is also selling off in batches to cash out. There are still quite a few IRYS tokens held, and once all are sold at the high point, a big crash will follow.
Therefore, the strategy should focus on shorting at highs. Light short positions can be taken when the price rises to 0.044-0.046. Manage your position carefully and keep reserves for averaging down. This kind of highly controlled coin carries great risk; just aim for doubling your investment.
#ETF单日流出超6亿美元，BTC价格能否企稳？