Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC $ETH For the mainstream market, this morning's pullback is very likely an emergency risk aversion by institutions in advance, and the market has started panic selling. But can this kind of market really be shorted? Caibao thinks there will be a short-term pullback but it won't affect the subsequent rally. Historically, midterm elections mostly result in presidential failures because the promises made after taking office are basically unfulfilled, and the reputation is relatively poor. So far, there have only been 3 successful midterm elections in history.
The market has been digesting this negative news. Before the election results are announced, the market will basically fluctuate back and forth for consolidation. After the results are finalized and the negative news is realized, the market usually falls first and then rises. Institutions will only enter to bottom-fish after the event is settled.
Ethereum spot ETF has had net outflows for 7 consecutive days, with the largest redemptions from BlackRock institutions. Coupled with recent hacker incidents, the bearish leverage has basically been liquidated in this round. If institutions start positive inflows later, the market may soon see a reversal.
Therefore, Caibao's reference suggestion is that the US stock token SPCX can be shorted in waves.
Mainstream BTC and ETH are bearish in the short term but not to be shorted, as they are already near the tail end of the market. A steady right-side bottom-fishing approach will be more prudent.More intriguing than losing money is the hacker's purchasing method. The issuer freezes assets forcing him to rush, and on-chain payments almost ignore the price—this forced buy order explains the situation better than the candlestick chart.
$ETH has become the passive receiver. The hacker's on-chain average purchase price of Ethereum is over 2,600, more than 300 dollars higher than derivatives, effectively paying a premium to the entire network. So ETH holding above 2,300 these days is not due to bullish strength but because someone is buying regardless of cost. My principle: do not add positions before 2,300 is firmly held; after it stabilizes, then consider previous highs.
$UNI is the most direct outlet for slippage; the shallow market depth is torn open by large orders creating a several hundred dollar gap. Short-term funds will reprice the DEX depth. I won't act on volume contraction above 7; will reconsider if it breaks below previous lows.
In the $HYPE event, derivative prices have become the anchor, with depth enduring the test. Currently consolidating around 84, still below the cost line over thirty days. I keep a base position and will add more if it dips below 80.
Conclusion: wait for forced buy orders to appear before entering; costs are bound to be higher than anticipated. The story begins with a long position. Core Trader 02 (0x9c062c…00560) opened a long on $PLTR with 10x leverage, holding 724.076 units, with a notional value of about $121,900. The monitoring captured this moment, but the ending remains unknown.
When I see numbers like this, I’m initially drawn to the amount. But after reading this, I want to say: this is a clearly directional trade, but it can’t yet be called a "heavy bet." The size of the amount and how important this trade is to him are two different things.
The reason lies off-camera. The notional value is the leveraged exposure; roughly calculated at 10x, the initial margin corresponds to about $12,200, excluding fees and margin mode differences; we don’t know the total account balance, so we can’t judge what percentage this represents; nor can we see other positions—if there are offsetting positions, then the role of this long in the overall strategy would change—this is just my speculation, not a known fact.
So the takeaway from this story is: don’t write an inner narrative for an address. The long position has been opened, but how strong the confidence is and how long it will be held remain unanswered. I will wait for his next move rather than hastily narrate this scene as a "whale bullish" story. What do you think—will this story end in profit-taking or a stop loss? What subsequent actions would make you more convinced of one outcome over the other?$ETH market has already started a downtrend ahead of schedule. Is the Republican Party going to lose in today's midterm election vote? What impact will this have on the subsequent market? What is the bottom position for BTC?
Currently, it is almost certain that the Democratic Party will sweep both chambers. The most anxious now should be Elon Musk, because he previously spent a large amount of money supporting the Republican Party to secure the Senate. If they lose, investigations into $SPCX and $TSLA will follow, and subsequent policy resistance may increase. This is definitely a major short-term negative. Additionally, the top ten on-chain addresses are mostly shorting at high levels, so selling pressure will be relatively strong. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ $BTC BTC 76274! 75K arrived as expected, did you catch it? I have already taken a light position!
Market confirmation: BTC perpetual contract currently at 76274.0 (24h down 1.50%), 24h volume exploded to 6.143 billion! The 1-hour chart closed with a large bearish candle, bottoming at 75690.1, precisely within yesterday's warning range of "75K-73.3K".
Indicators oversold, but the heavy sell-off volume prevents a false bull trap:
MACD: sharp volume increase below zero line, final capitulation of bears;
KDJ: extreme oversold, short-term rebound possible, but no divergence means no bottom confirmed;
MFI: 26.8 (capital flow freezing point), compared to the morning's election game, funds are truly fleeing, not just a simple shakeout.
Key levels (latest 1-hour):
Support: 76022 (immediate) → 75690 (previous low critical point) → 75000 (psychological/ultimate bottom at 73.3K);
Resistance: 77181 (resistance level) → 77413 (Supertrend bull/bear boundary) → 78831 (previous high).
"75K order entry" logic (dominated by election variables):
Yesterday I said "76.2K decides life or death, break to see 75K," now fulfilled as expected! Before the election results land, the sell-off is a golden pit. I have taken an extremely light long position (1%-2%) above 75690, with strict stop loss at 75000/75690 break. Only a move back above 77181 confirms a rebound, passing 77413 turns safe; if the election deadlock or negative news occurs, breaking 75690 directly targets 73300, no holding the position.
Control your trades at the mid-level!CNN has already given a prediction for the U.S. midterm elections in the House of Representatives: 171 seats have been decided, with Democrats holding 110 seats and Republicans 61 seats. The majority party is about to change.
The speed at which this news spreads in the crypto community is even faster than the results themselves. Over the past two years, people have gotten used to directly translating "Washington changing hands" into "bullish" or "bearish" signals and immediately looking for corresponding price movements.
But when the House changes its majority party, the first thing to change isn't the coin price, but the process. The House controls three things: appropriations, committee chairmanships, and bill scheduling. The provisions that the crypto industry truly cares about—whether they can be scheduled on the agenda, who will preside over the discussions, and the voting time window—all start to diverge from this stage. This is a slow variable, not breaking news.
So for assets like $BTC, the short-term movement is more likely to be driven by sentiment first and text later. The sentiment phase is the easiest to profit from and also the riskiest because it doesn't rely on any facts; the text phase determines the mid-term direction, and the text often takes weeks or even months to appear.
My judgment is: this news is worth noting but not worth adjusting your position on the same day. The real signal appears on the day the bill draft is made public, focusing on the breadth of the provisions, not the election score.
Here's a question worth pondering: Over the past two years, how much of your crypto gains or losses have truly been related to the same-day market reaction to a piece of Washington news? For most people, the answer is actually very little. What determines the outcome is still your reaction speed and position size.#AMDQ3DataCenterUp97% i see AMD as a strong long-term AI infrastructure investment candidate. However, I would evaluate its valuation and stock price before entering.
My key takeaway: AMD is no longer just betting on the AI boom; it is increasingly generating substantial revenue from it.
I would keep AMD on my long-term watchlist alongside NVDA, MSFT and GOOGL.$FIL FIL in this round, I am holding a base position to play the recovery rally of the storage narrative, without being empty and waiting for signals.
There has always been long-term miner selling pressure, which is a burden it can't shake off, but recently the market has changed, and the downward momentum is slowly weakening, no longer a mindless dump rhythm. I am gradually building my position according to plan, setting up defensive lines, not doing frequent short-term trades, betting on capital inflow into the storage sector to bring a wave of recovery.
Keep an eye on the first resistance level above; consider adding positions to push profits only after a volume-supported breakout; if it breaks the defense line, decisively reduce positions to control losses, not stubbornly holding and getting deeply trapped. The sector logic still holds, but the start requires cooperation from the overall market and sector funds, so hold positions patiently and wait for capital to choose the direction.The U.S. midterm elections have officially entered a critical phase, and the election results will become a key short-term market variable. Different congressional configurations have distinctly different impacts on the pricing logic of gold.
The current market expectation leans toward the Democrats taking the House of Representatives, while the Senate's control remains uncertain. After the election results are finalized, there are roughly two core scenarios to consider.
First, a divided Congress. Each party controls one chamber, making legislative and budget progress prone to gridlock, increasing the difficulty of passing major policies and constraining the administrative agenda. In this environment, market uncertainty fluctuates, and the market is likely to remain volatile with no clear trend. Gold is unlikely to experience a strong one-sided rally and will more likely fluctuate with news.
Second, if the Democrats control both chambers. Subsequent scrutiny and investigations targeting the executive branch will increase, major legislation will face ongoing contention, budget disagreements and potential government shutdown risks will heighten market risk aversion, and capital will reprice uncertainty, potentially providing strong support for gold.
Looking back, when the ruling party controls both chambers, policy implementation is more efficient; once congressional checks and balances strengthen, aggressive policies and geopolitically related actions are easily restrained, which can also affect oil price dynamics. Of course, the above is only a market projection based on the political landscape. Ultimately, everything awaits the election results to be finalized before re-evaluating market pricing #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $XAU Midterm elections show preliminary Democratic advantage, U.S. Treasury yields fall, dollar weakens
On November 4, preliminary results of the U.S. midterm elections indicate a Democratic advantage. Market sentiment betting on the Democrats taking control of both chambers of Congress quickly intensified, leading to price fluctuations across various asset classes.
The bond market reacted most directly. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield fell from an earlier 4.97% to around 4.89%, reaching its lowest level since early September.
Risk assets and the dollar simultaneously came under pressure. U.S. stock index futures faced sell-offs, with S&P 500 futures down 1.36% and Nasdaq 100 futures declining further by 2.32%; the dollar index also weakened, dropping to its lowest level since late September.
Fortunately, amid the dollar's weakness, non-U.S. currencies with safe-haven attributes strengthened. The Swiss franc rose 0.8%, the euro gained 0.6% against the dollar, and the yen appreciated 0.5% versus the dollar.
Currently, market trading logic mainly revolves around expectations of a divided government. Investors judge that the difficulty of implementing large-scale fiscal expansion policies will increase, which may suppress long-term U.S. Treasury yields and reduce the dollar's appeal.
However, some market views hold that vote counting in the midterm elections is still ongoing, and the final control of Congress has not yet been fully determined.
If election outcomes change later, market pricing for fiscal policy, the dollar, and U.S. Treasury yields may still adjust.
#美国中期选举At 5 AM, $BTC reached 78,066. When I woke up and checked, it had already dropped back to 76,954.
Last night I said I would only consider moving if it held steady at 77,600, but it surged past that and then fell back down. Luckily, I didn’t chase it.
There’s one number I’m paying close attention to: the long-short ratio dropped from 2.76 last night to 2.38. Fewer people are bottom-fishing, which actually makes me feel it’s less risky.
But for now, I won’t make a move. The US election votes are still being counted, and neither chamber is decided yet. If the low of 76,853 this morning doesn’t hold, I’ll be watching around 75,856 first.
Data as of 08:38, personal review, not investment advice.
What do you think will happen first today: a return to 78,000 or a break below 76,000?
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 #BTC #MarketAnalysisThe situation in the Middle East is heating up. What the market really needs to be wary of is not the news itself, but the sudden reversal of risk sentiment.
If the US-Iran conflict escalates, don’t rush to treat $BTC as the first choice for safe haven. The trends over the past few years have shown that BTC often behaves more like a high-risk asset during panic markets and can also face sell-offs when liquidity tightens.
What’s truly worth watching are the fund flows in gold, US Treasuries, and the movement of the US dollar.
My thinking is simple: geopolitical conflicts bring uncertainty, not an unconditional signal to go long.
First observe the situation, then watch the funds. Don’t let panic make your trading decisions for you.
$BTC $ETH #CryptoMarket #MiddleEastSituation
#USMidtermsCongressWatch SOL lifted back to 93, HYPE took a breather after the surge
$SOL 93.17, down 0.8% in the past 24 hours, partial rebound is happening, but the long-term momentum is still weak 🔵
Based on the closed daily chart, RSI14 is about 25.5, momentum remains weak, the current rebound looks more like a repair of previous resistance, the longer-term trend cannot yet be considered strong.
The quote is about 2.5% higher than the low of 90.87, showing some local reaction. I would give some credit to the rebound while still maintaining the judgment of weak momentum; both perspectives need to be honestly included.
$HYPE 85.7, down 0.4% in the past 24 hours, took a breather after the surge, original zone still below 🪁
Lifted from around 84, after reaching 86.63 it retreated to 85.7, giving back some gains but still above the previous 84.5 area, the rebound hasn’t fully returned to the starting point.
This retreat looks more like a pause after an upward move, not a complete failure of the recovery. I am moderately optimistic locally, based on the remaining zone rather than just the speed at the peak; the position still holds.
$ICP 2.484, down 0.9% in the past 24 hours, trading volume doubled but price hasn’t moved 🧮
In the past three full hours, price only rose 0.1%, but trading volume was 2.1 times that of the previous three hours, more trading hasn’t brought a corresponding upward move, heat and momentum are temporarily disconnected.
After reaching 2.501, the quote returned to 2.484, no hold above 2.50. I tend to see this as range consolidation; increased volume needs to be accompanied by price movement, so I don’t rate it as accelerating upward yet.Bitcoin's "Election Effect": Political Catalyst or Just Coinciding with the Halving Cycle? As the U.S. midterm elections approach, market participants are once again debating whether political outcomes can reliably predict Bitcoin price trends. Historical data reveals an interesting phenomenon: since 1950, the S&P 500 index has risen in the year following all 19 midterm elections, with an average gain of 15.1%. Bitcoin, across its three full cycles, has also seen higher prices one year after each midterm election. However, in the weeks immediately following the elections, Bitcoin has without exception experienced declines—this detail complicates the narrative of the "election effect." Overlapping Halving Cycles The core challenge in isolating the election effect is that every midterm election in Bitcoin's history has coincided with a halving cycle. The 2014 midterms occurred about six months after the 2012 halving, the 2018 midterms about 16 months after the 2016 halving, and the 2022 midterms about 18 months after the 2020 halving. These periods represent different stages of the supply shock cycle, making it difficult to attribute post-election gains solely to political outcomes. The halving mechanism—cutting Bitcoin's new issuance roughly in half every four years—has historically been the primary driver of price cycles, often overshadowing other macro and political factors. Post-Election Volatility: A Consistent Pattern Despite positive one-year returns, the immediate period following midterm elections is characterized by short-term weakness. In 2014, 2018, and 2022, Bitcoin after the voteEarnings exceeded expectations, but the stock price still fell
$GOOGL earnings report came out, with both revenue and profit rising.
It was still sold off after hours.
The key point is this: what fell was not the performance, but the expectations
Buyers had already priced in the “growth.”
The earnings report just turned expectations into numbers.
The next step is: if guidance is lowered, those who have made enough profit will run first
The price is set by the most urgent seller.
No matter how good the performance is, it can’t stop them from selling first.
The earnings report owes no one, it owes the cost to those who bought at the high point.
#闪迪业绩超预期并宣布拆股，股价跌逾13%
#$GOOGL $ETH
A security incident occurred on the trading platform, but why can't we directly conclude that there is a problem with the Ethereum network?
Custody keys, application contracts, and underlying consensus belong to different risk layers. To assess ETH, we still need to focus on settlement demand, staking activities, and network fees.
The opposing view is that fund withdrawals will transmit from the platform to the chain. If stablecoin settlement and lending demand recover and fees remain stable, I would increase my assessment of recovery; if only the coin price rebounds while on-chain activity continues to contract, the evidence is still insufficient.After the U.S. stock market closed on Tuesday, November 3, copper, natural gas, and silver showed a pattern of “sharp declines in copper and silver, with natural gas standing out.” Copper and silver were suppressed by uncertainties surrounding the U.S. midterm elections, a stronger dollar, and rising U.S. Treasury yields; natural gas, however, rose against the trend due to its tight supply-demand structure.
---
🔴 Copper: Risk appetite declines combined with rising costs for Chinese buyers, plunging over 2.5%
COMEX December copper futures closed at $6.4020 per pound, down 2.52%, hitting an intraday low of $6.318—the lowest since October 22—with a trading range of $6.318–$6.5525. Volume expanded to 67,736 contracts, while open interest slightly decreased to 153,677 contracts.
The core driver of the copper price plunge was a concentrated drop in risk appetite. On the day of the U.S. midterm election voting, the market worried that if the Democrats gained significant advantage, regulatory scrutiny on AI data center construction might intensify, negatively impacting copper demand expectations. KCM Trade analysts explicitly noted that regulatory pressure on the tech sector would transmit to the copper market through the AI computing power chain.
Meanwhile, the People’s Bank of China raised the foreign exchange reserve requirement ratio to guide the RMB exchange rate lower, directly increasing the cost for Chinese buyers to purchase dollar-denominated copper, suppressing marginal spot buying. The domestic Shanghai copper December contract also fell by 1,490 yuan to 106,090 yuan/ton.
However, the fundamental bottom support remains intact. The Yangshan copper premium remains high at $200/ton, indicating strong spot demand in China; the Chilean Copper Commission lowered its 2026 production forecast from 5.27 million tons to 4.94 million tons (a decrease of 8.4%) and simultaneously cut the 2027 production outlook, reinforcing supply constraints at the mine level. The copper price decline is more a short-term release of financial pressure rather than a deterioration of physical supply and demand.
---
🥈 Silver: Pressured by the dollar and U.S. Treasury yields, decline far exceeds gold’s
COMEX December silver futures closed at $49.810 per ounce, down $1.078 or 2.12%, with an intraday range of $48.62–$50.915. Silver’s decline was nearly three times that of gold (-0.74%), with both financial and industrial attributes under pressure.
The suppression came from two directions. The dollar and U.S. Treasury yields rose in tandem, with the 10-year Treasury yield hovering near 4.9%, increasing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets, hitting silver first. At the same time, uncertainty around the U.S. midterm elections prompted investors to reduce risk exposure, with silver, a highly volatile asset, being sold off first.
A deeper drag was that oil prices fell about 2% intraday, briefly easing inflation concerns and driving a rebound in gold and silver, but then rising Treasury yields and a stronger dollar overwhelmed this positive, causing gold to retreat from highs and silver to weaken accordingly. The World Gold Council on the same day lowered its forecast for gold investment demand growth this year from 400 tons to 200 tons, citing weaker demand for bars and coins, a sentiment that indirectly affected silver as well.
---
🔥 Natural Gas: Rising against the trend, tight supply-demand structure provides independent support
NYMEX natural gas futures closed at $2.883 per million British thermal units, up $0.019 or 0.66%, with a daily high of $2.88 and low of $2.85. Against the backdrop of sharp declines in copper and silver, natural gas showed a completely independent and relatively strong trend.
The rise in natural gas is rooted in a marginal tightening of the U.S. domestic market’s supply-demand structure. Although expectations of a warm winter remain the core narrative suppressing midterm prices, short-term production has fallen from peak levels, and LNG export terminals are gradually recovering after concentrated shutdowns, providing bottom support for prices. In the week ending October 30, natural gas futures rose cumulatively by 9.79%, reaching a high of $3.092, indicating that short-covering demand after extreme crowding remains.
Unlike copper and silver, natural gas pricing is anchored in domestic supply and demand, making it less sensitive to a stronger dollar and midterm election risks. When financial-attribute-dominated commodities are sold off en masse due to macro sentiment, natural gas, supported by its tight fundamentals, became one of the few commodities to close higher that evening.
---
💎 Summary
Copper and silver are trading under a macro suppression combination of “stronger dollar + rising U.S. Treasury yields + midterm election uncertainty,” with copper additionally burdened by rising marginal buying costs due to China’s foreign exchange policy; natural gas trades on an independent logic of “marginal tightening of domestic supply and demand + short-covering after crowded shorts,” temporarily decoupling from the synchronized fluctuations of macro risk assets. Copper’s decline has not shaken the supply constraints at the mine level or the physical demand reflected by the Yangshan premium, while silver needs to watch the next moves of the dollar and interest rates—if the dollar falls after midterm election results are finalized, silver’s recovery potential may exceed that of copper.Stop sleeping, your position is getting crushed
These past two days are not just a pullback, it's a full-scale retreat.
BTC: Volume surge breaking support, not a shakeout
From 78,700 down to 75,800 in three days, the key is volume. On the 2nd, turnover was 23.5 billion, on the 4th it surged to 24.6 billion—previously during sideways trading it was just over 12 billion. The volume-driven drop shows real selling pressure, not just a shakeout. The small support at 77,000 has already been broken, 76,000 is a psychological barrier, and below that, supports come one by one at 75,000 and 73,000. The two-month consolidation box has chosen a downward direction.
ETH: No buyers at 2,300, the rebound is a desperate escape
It surged to 2,311 with a long upper wick and then pulled back, still hanging there now. What does this mean? At that level, sell orders crushed down, buyers didn’t follow. The rebound can’t surpass previous highs, each wave is lower than the last—a typical weak structure. ETH is not leading the drop now, it’s following, which is even worse—it shows capital doesn’t even want to allocate here.
ZEC: Single-day -8%, high-level coins start to stampede
A couple of days ago it was the darling of privacy narratives, now a big bearish candle from 1,280 straight down to 1,130. The biggest gainers fall the hardest; this is the fate of high-level coins—profit takers see the market turning and run faster than anyone else. Don’t catch the fall; this first big bearish candle before a halving cut usually isn’t the last. Coincidentally, the $BTC four-year halving cycle exactly aligns with the U.S. midterm election cycle on the same timeline.
Historically in 2014, 2018, and 2022, these three midterm elections all occurred near the end of bear markets. After the midterm elections, there is often one last wave of sell-off and panic liquidation, which marks the cycle bottom, followed by the gradual start of a new bull market. Even more interestingly, the timing of the bottom has been advancing.
In 2014, the bear market bottom was reached 71 days after the midterm election; in 2018, it was 39 days after; and in 2022, the low point came just 13 days after. This can be understood as institutional capital increasing, information transmission speeding up, and risk pricing accelerating. What used to take months of grinding panic is now priced in within weeks or even days.
However, this is a historical statistical pattern, and the underlying drivers of each downturn are completely different. This cycle adds another variable: the election results are directly tied to expectations for crypto-friendly policies. If the control of both chambers changes, regulatory and legislative expectations will rewrite market pricing.
If you often get trapped chasing rallies and selling in dips without clear direction, visit the homepage Study Club to get operational ideas.
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $ETH I saw the news about computing power restrictions, and my first reaction was not to look for concept coins, but to calculate the odds: the narrative might heat up, but whether the business can catch it determines if this expected value is worth giving.
According to reports, Nvidia has asked its data center partners to reduce business with Chinese customers, requiring cloud computing clients to sell at least 51% of their services to non-Chinese companies. This only applies to new contracts and does not affect existing agreements. Nvidia has neither confirmed nor denied this.
My judgment is that this is a narrative catalyst for decentralized computing power, but not yet a positive order signal. Existing agreements are unaffected, meaning we cannot directly infer a sudden migration of existing demand; chip usage restrictions do not equate to on-chain computing power being able to replace it. If related projects can prove that computing power is usable and costs are reasonable, I would be willing to raise expectations for demand realization; if it's only conceptual hype, I think it is not worth giving a high valuation. When facing such news, do people value the win rate after order verification more, or do they prefer to bet early on the odds of substitute demand?Tether holds $130 billion in reserves, what is the next step for the six-layer tech stack? At the Lugano Plan ₿ forum, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino used Asimov's "Foundation" series as an analogy to propose a vision far beyond the scope of stablecoins: a six-layer open-source "independent tech stack" covering energy, mining, communications, finance, and artificial intelligence. Behind this grand blueprint lies a massive reserve of about 150,000 bitcoins, $132.4 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds, and approximately 150 tons of gold. However, the timing is intriguing: by 2026, the USDT supply has basically stopped growing. Vision backed by reserves Tether's balance sheet has become one of the most closely watched focal points in the crypto industry. The $132.4 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds alone is enough to place it among the world's largest holders of U.S. government debt, comparable to some sovereign nations. The holdings of bitcoin and gold add hard asset diversification, protecting the company from single market volatility. This reserve not only provides credibility endorsement but also funds Ardoino's expansion roadmap. Why shift now? The stagnation of USDT supply is a key signal. For years, Tether's growth has been a proxy indicator of crypto adoption, especially in emerging markets where access to dollars is difficult. But with supply peaking, the company faces a strategic inflection point. Tether seems no longer to rely solely on seigniorage income from stablecoin issuance but positions itself as a diversified technology group. If the six-layer tech stack can beEveryone says, "If the exchange promises full compensation, users will be fine." Brazil's largest exchange Mercado Bitcoin just tested this statement.
On November 2, it was hacked. The exchange itself acknowledged a loss of 36.3 million USD, while the on-chain analysis company Chainalysis estimated 49 million USD. They said users wouldn't lose out and have recovered and frozen about 12.9 million USD.
But as of this morning, withdrawals are still closed with no reopening date. The numbers are all there in the accounts, but you just can't transfer out.
Compensation means "we'll pay you later," while withdrawals mean "can you use it now?" These are two different things. $BTC dropped from 81,000 to 77,000 this week, and those frozen have no choice but to hold.
The most discussed topic in today's intelligence is $HYPE, with the breakdown placed in the poster. To be honest: This round of AI Agent was a dream first told by the funds, and also the first to wake up by the funds.
Last month, the ai16z faction was still airdropping daily, launching a new agent every day, and $AKE was hyped above 0.0047 along with the sector, with KOL tweets outnumbering the code. This week, the trend changed; there was no new story from the large models, and all the money shifted to meme coins and Bitcoin, making small-cap AI tokens the first to be cleared out. No one was dumping, just no one was buying, so the price slid down on its own.
My 0.00474 short position has nothing to do with "being bearish on AI." It was because I saw a rebound climbing back to the high point, a long upper wick on the 1H chart, but volume shrank—the buying pressure was exhausted, and that was the real signal. 20x leverage, stop loss above 0.0048.
Now at 0.00347, it has dropped a full segment. But I am tighter than when I entered: the bottom of narrative coins is made by a wick, not by falling. Once 0.0035 is pierced by a wick, all those waiting to break even above will run, and the shorts will be squeezed.
Until there is new news, I just treat this as the tail end of the retreat. Profiting is luck; knowing when to stop is skill. $BTC $ETH #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $BTC has plummeted! Here is Bitcoin's performance after the last 3 midterm elections: 2014: Lost control of both chambers, bottomed around $171 within 71 days, a drop of -48% 2018: Lost control of the House, bottomed around $3200 within 39 days, a drop of -50% 2022: Lost control of the House, bottomed around $15500 within 13 days, a drop of -16% Prediction market data shows the probability of Democrats taking the House surged from 92% to 95%, and the probability of Democrats taking the Senate iThe growth in USDC's scale is real, but it has not yet effectively translated into meaningful shareholder returns. The Q3 financial report is very likely to continue the divergence pattern of "volume increase without profit growth," with the core contradiction lying not in the issuance scale but in the income and cost structures.
The recognition of Arc presale revenue may represent an incremental factor that the market has not yet fully priced in. Circle expects to recognize about $180 million in ARC presale revenue for the full year 2026. The exact amount booked in Q3 will directly affect whether the "other income" item can significantly exceed the pace implied by guidance. If management chooses to recognize a portion in Q3, the probability of an unexpected revenue upside will significantly increase.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ What I noticed is not how much the Korean stock market fell, but that it turned down after opening higher: During investors' wait for the US midterm election results, the South Korean KOSPI index dropped 2.7%, Samsung Electronics fell 3%, SK Hynix declined 4.5%, and AI-related stocks retreated. This is somewhat interesting, but it cannot be directly translated into the crypto AI sector falling. 👀
My judgment is that this news is somewhat sentimentally negative for highly volatile small-cap coins, but it is not evidence of a deterioration in the fundamentals of related projects. The election results have not been finalized, and uncertainty tends to suppress risk appetite; if this caution spreads to the crypto market, then small coins that rely on narratives to attract attention may be more vulnerable to shocks than mature assets. This is my speculation, not a market move that has already happened.
Opportunities in highly volatile assets often hide when sentiment drags different assets down together. But I will be a bit restrained: AI in stocks and AI in crypto are not the same business logic, so you cannot forcibly apply the same trend just because they share a label. Small coins also carry an additional layer of liquidity risk; large price fluctuations do not necessarily mean better opportunities.
I will observe after the election news is finalized whether risk-off sentiment eases and whether AI-related small coins show volume-price divergence, rather than just focusing on a single sharp drop. What sectors have you been paying attention to recently? When facing such macro uncertainty, do you focus more on the AI narrative or other directions with actual use cases?This person's investment approach is crazy!
It is said that he bought $10 worth of Bitcoin every day for 8 consecutive years, investing a total of about $25,500, and now the account value has exceeded $10 million!
No complicated operations, just long-term consistent dollar-cost averaging.
This is the power of time and compound interest.
$BTC ETF is withdrawing, whales are buying, but contract whales are turning short: BTC's "expensive divergence," ETH faces 6.8 billion shorts above
$BTC bulls left behind are paying the highest price
ETF outflows, BlackRock IBIT alone holds 233 million. But on-chain whale holdings have risen to 3.03 million coins, the highest since November 2025, with a 30-day accumulation speed fastest since February this year. The problem is: BTC whale positions on Hyperliquid have turned net short, and a whale sold 1,312 BTC to switch to ETH. Open interest has dropped to a 12-month low, but the 7-day average funding rate remains at the 100th percentile of the past 90 days, meaning the bulls left are paying the most expensive holding cost in the past three months. Unable to break 78,219, these bulls will fuel the next downward move
$ETH below 2,300 has 1.26 billion longs, while above there is a thicker cluster of shorts
Trading below the volume POC at 2,408, within the value area. Liquidation charts show two short clusters of about 3.4 billion each between 2,420 and 2,440 above, but about 1.26 billion long clusters gather near 2,300 below. About 75% of accounts hold longs, but the top traders' long ratio has slowly declined from 63%. The strongest buy orders are near 2,255. As long as the 4-hour candle does not reclaim 2,408, the path to first sweep 2,300 and then probe down to 2,255 is smoother
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ 🔥Don't mistake the leverage liquidation for a market recovery; we are currently only in the latter half of the deleveraging cycle.
Funds have fled early, prices have not yet given a drastic signal, and position flows are the real main theme. BTC faces the heaviest pressure, with a 24-hour net spot outflow of 1.064 billion and futures outflow reaching as high as 3.098 billion; leverage contraction has not stopped at all. Liquidation data also confirms this: among BTC liquidations, 62% are still longs, and longs continue to be washed out.
The market has already shown clear divergence. ETH has brief buying interest, with a four-hour net spot inflow of 37.06 million, but futures simultaneously see an outflow of 171 million; the slight spot support is offset by derivative capital withdrawal. Its liquidation structure has reversed, with 70% of liquidations being shorts, meaning shorts are getting hit first. SOL and ETH have similar rhythms, with 59% of liquidations from shorts, and contract funds also retracting; the deleveraging cycle is not over.
In just one day, the liquidation focus has gradually shifted: the previous day, 90% of liquidations were longs, now short liquidations have increased, and the market is starting a two-way squeeze. Two-way liquidations often indicate a bottom-seeking phase, not a bottom formation.
The most critical test lies with ETH: can this small spot buying continue to outperform the fleeing futures funds? If spot inflows cannot hold, a new round of sell-offs and chain liquidations could come at any time.
After this round of two-way cleansing, who do you think will be the first to stand firm?
$BTC $ETH $SOLOpening the market chart today, the five major mainstream coins all turned green simultaneously, but the most striking thing is not the decline itself, but the "dislocation" of the decline. $BTC is quoted at $77,046, down only 0.60%; $ETH slid to $2,268; $SOL dropped to $92.38; $DOGE fell to $0.07415; while $OKB plunged 3.15%, a decline more than five times that of $BTC. In the same downturn, why did the platform coin fall harder? This detail is more worth pondering than just "another drop." First, let's separate cause and effect. This round of adjustment is not due to a black swan event in any single coin, but the result of three overlapping pressures. The first layer comes from outside: the US tech stock sector continues to be under pressure, global risk appetite overall cools down, and the crypto market cannot remain unaffected. The second layer comes from the capital side: the US spot Bitcoin ETF has recently seen significant net outflows, combined with concentrated liquidation of long contract positions, adding more pressure to an already fragile market. The third is a timing factor—today is the US midterm election, the results are not yet announced, so funds naturally choose to wait and see rather than attack. The three forces act in the same direction, forming a "decline without a single culprit." The truly underestimated signal is hidden in the structure. The excessive decline of $OKB indicates that in an environment of liquidity contraction, assets lacking sustained buying support will be sold off first, amplifying the decline. But based on just one market snapshot, it is impossible to conclude there is a specific negative factor or concentrated large holder sell-off; a more reasonable interpretation is short-term insufficient support. This precisely marks the market's shift from "broad decline" to "differentiation." At the close of Eastern US time on November 3 (early morning Beijing time on November 4), the five major asset classes showed a game of "US stock structural divergence, US Treasury sell-off, slight rise in the US dollar, gold under pressure, and crude oil deep V reversal."
Specific trends and key data are as follows:
· US Stocks (sharp divergence): The three major indices moved differently, with AI tech stocks counterattacking against the trend, while the Dow weakened under the drag of traditional heavyweights. The S&P 500 rose 0.36% to 7568.92 points, the Nasdaq rose 0.83% to 25372.01 points, and the Dow fell 0.38% to 51786.72 points. Large tech stocks performed well, with Microsoft up 2.74%, Facebook up 2.36%, Nvidia up 2.29%, Amazon up 2.06%, and only Tesla down 1.32%.
· US Treasuries (collective rise): Driven by strong JOLTS job openings data, US Treasury sell-off pressure resumed, pushing yields higher across the board. The 10-year Treasury yield rose 5.16 basis points to 4.964%, approaching the 5% threshold again; the 2-year Treasury yield rose 3.31 basis points to 4.631%; the 30-year Treasury yield rose 4.4 basis points to 5.331%.
· US Dollar (slightly stronger): Supported by strong economic data and the Fed's hawkish stance, the US dollar index closed slightly higher at 101.86 (up 0.06%), firmly above the 101 level again.
· Gold (volatile under pressure): Suppressed by rising Treasury yields and a strong dollar, precious metals weakened. COMEX gold futures fell 0.74% to $3940.20/oz, losing the 3950 support; COMEX silver futures fell 2.12% to $49.81/oz.
· Crude Oil (deep V reversal): Experienced sharp intraday fluctuations due to Middle East geopolitical news. Amid rising expectations of US-Iran talks, WTI crude oil plunged intraday but then rebounded sharply following geopolitical fluctuations, ending with WTI crude oil slightly up 0.31% at $96.76/barrel and Brent crude oil slightly down 0.39% at $104.36/barrel.
Comparison with the previous day (November 3): One day earlier, the market was still playing out a completely opposite pricing logic. Influenced by breakthrough progress in Middle East diplomacy, WTI crude oil plunged 7.55% in a single day, suppressing inflation expectations and boosting gold's sharp rise of 1.48%. Treasury yields fell across the board, and the US dollar dropped to a one-month low amid easing risk aversion. By early November 4, with strong employment and factory data released and Treasury yields rising again, funds concentrated on AI tech stocks, and the deep crude oil sell-off was quickly bought back for trading.10x leverage is the number I care about most in this position opening. Core Trader 02 just opened a new long position on $MU with a nominal value of about $50,000. When I mentor newcomers, I often remind them: don’t rush to guess if their call is right; first, understand how much adverse volatility you can withstand.
📌 Using this position as a simplified example: with 10x leverage, the initial margin is about $5,000. If the price drops 1%, the unrealized loss is about $500, which is 10% of the initial margin, and this doesn’t even include fees. My judgment is that leverage should be determined by the stop-loss distance, not by "how confident I am," otherwise normal fluctuations might become unbearable.
Newcomers often misunderstand: 10x leverage means you can safely withstand a 10% drop. In reality, forced liquidation is also affected by maintenance margin, account type, and other factors, so you can’t just calculate it that way. Is there any part of the margin loss and price drop conversion you still don’t understand? Feel free to leave a comment about where you’re stuck.Looking at this Dogecoin chart, we see high price swings. Back on June 9, 2026, it dropped down from 0.11348, then bounced up from the 0.06757 low on August 15. After that, it climbed toward a peak around late September before sliding down again to the current 0.07297 price level. Looking at past up and down trends, it often tests support before rising. Do you think it will bounce back up past 0.0800 soon or drop lower? Can't say too early about $SKHYNIX, it seems yesterday's thinking was actually correct, it's really not Sister Shan's hindsight!!! The facts are right there on the market haha
NVIDIA's market cap returned to $5 trillion, AMD plunged nearly 8% after hours, the project side hyped expectations for a short-term boost, which is also why Hynix surged yesterday 🚀🚀
And the reason for the sharp drop this morning is entirely due to the impact of the Korean stock market opening this morning, plus the positive sentiment has been exhausted, the flood has been released before the election, so the trend after the election won't be very good, and the rebound strength won't be very strong!
In the short term, Sister Shan still remains bearish on Hynix, the brief rebound is just intra-day funds playing games, the shorts have gone crazy, the cost-effectiveness of bottom-fishing is not high, so Sister Shan still continues to be bearish in the short term!"If Trump loses the midterm elections, will Bitcoin directly break below 40,000, or even touch 35,000 before rebounding? It’s unlikely. Currently, BTC is around 77,000, and the probability of the Democrats winning the midterms is already high, partially priced into the market. Surveys show that when the Democrats control Congress, the median year-end expectation is about 76,000, with most seeing support at 60,000. Dropping to 35,000-40,000 would require a larger macro shock. Politics is one factor, but liquidity and ETF flows are more critical. Historically, after midterms, the market often adjusts first before rising. #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ Storage stocks are stuck, don't rush to "rescue" yet
This drop is indeed severe. Seagate down 7.88%, Western Digital down 7.52%, SanDisk down 6.59%, Micron down 5.78%, almost the entire storage sector is down. The worst hit is SanDisk, whose earnings and guidance exceeded expectations, yet it was still hammered 17% in two days, breaking below the 200-day moving average. The better the performance, the more it falls; it's hard for holders not to question their decisions.
But the first thing after being stuck is not to ask when you'll break even, but to figure out where exactly you are stuck.
If you chased at a high price, the worst thing now is to think "it’s dropped so much, I’ll just average down a bit." Morgan Stanley’s blunt but true statement: storage stocks often peak before the profit peak, and valuations are cheapest when the market is most optimistic. What’s trading now is not that demand is gone, but that price increases are slowing. This rebound phase is a correction, not a reversal; averaging down on a rebound can make losses heavier.
If you bought in batches on the left side, you have to admit you bought too early. Buying early is not shameful; what’s shameful is adding more during the rebound. Storage did rebound on November 4, with SanDisk up 4.78% and Micron up 2.58%. But with this kind of rebound, first see if the leaders can hold steady on lower volume; don’t think you’re right just because of one bullish candle.
What you should do now is not predict the bottom, but reduce your position to a level where you can sleep at night. Reduce some from heavy positions during the rebound, wait for right-side confirmation if you have light positions, and if you’re out, don’t reach in just because it’s dropped a lot. AI demand for storage hasn’t collapsed, but stock prices and fundamentals have never moved in sync.
Just my personal random thoughts, not advice. If you’re stuck, take care of your mindset first, don’t worry about face. $BTC 75988 has broken below the lower Bollinger Band, $ETH 2237 short position is stuck and painful, $ZEC 1172 took profit and ran first
Can my $ETH still break even?
At $BTC 76000, honestly, the drop is quite harsh, directly breaking the lower Bollinger Band at 76265, RSI dropped to 24.3, oversold to the extreme. I glanced at the 4-hour chart, 75734 is the 24-hour low, just over two hundred dollars away from the current price. If this level breaks again, there’s really no support below, will have to look for buyers at 75000. But from my experience, if RSI is this low and there’s no rebound yet, it means the bearish sentiment hasn’t fully released. Don’t rush to bottom fish, wait for a bullish divergence or volume-supported stop in the decline.
$ETH Your 2237 short position is stuck and painful? Let me tell you it gets worse—current price 2237.94, lower Bollinger Band at 2244, already grinding along the lower band, RSI 22.7 even lower than BTC. Such extreme oversold conditions can trigger a violent rebound anytime that hits your stop loss. My advice is don’t hold on stubbornly, set a stop loss above 2270, reduce your position and exit around 2250-2260 on the rebound, don’t be greedy for the last bit. Funding rate is still positive at 0.01%, bulls aren’t dead yet, shorts aren’t as safe as you think.
$ZEC running away nicely at 1172 this round, 2.79% gain is real profit in hand, don’t look back before stabilizing above the middle Bollinger Band at 1197. In this market, BTC and ETH can be summed up in one word: wait. Wait for panic selling to clear, wait for RSI to turn, don’t catch a falling knife halfway down the mountain.$BTC vs $ETH liquidation comparison, market moves in sync, but liquidation intensity differs 📊
This round of decline concentrated on liquidating longs within 24 hours:
✅ BTC: 24h liquidation of 110 million, long position liquidation 90.539 million, long liquidations dominate, many chasing longs were swept out in bulk
✅ ETH: 24h liquidation of 57.392 million, long position liquidation 35.815 million, also mainly cleaning longs, but short liquidations are also significant
In 24 hours, a total of 365 million liquidations globally, 89,857 people liquidated, the largest single liquidation occurred on ETH.
The market consistently smashed and swept longs, but BTC's long liquidation scale is much larger than ETH's. Do you think the longs will stabilize after this round of cleaning?The two layers of support mentioned in the morning report have both been broken, and this time the dip is accompanied by volume.
The morning report mentioned BTC first targeting 76813—76853, then 76386; ETH first targeting 2259—2262, then 2241. Around 11 o'clock, both coins sequentially fell below these levels. From the local high this morning, the maximum intraday drawdown exceeded 2%, so this cannot be considered a normal pullback.
The most intense period was from 10:58 to 11:08. BTC traded about 536 coins in the 15-minute candle from 11:00 to 11:15, compared to about 192 coins in the previous candle, with a low of 75734; ETH traded about 5251 coins in the same candle, compared to about 1838 coins previously, with a low of 2227. The simultaneous volume increase on the downside indicates selling pressure has indeed intensified, but I have not found any confirmed sudden event that strictly matches the sharp drop minute-by-minute, so I cannot definitively say a specific news item caused the dump.
At 11:16 spot snapshot, BTC was about 76037, ETH about 2239. My judgment has shifted from "looking for support" to "seeing if the price can recover after breaking down": if BTC cannot recover 76386 and ETH cannot recover 2241 within the next hour, the rebound will still be considered a weak correction; if they do recover, we need to see if the subsequent full 15-minute candle can hold. There is high volatility during the sharp drop, so be cautious of risks. $BTC $ETHLooking at this daily chart, Uniswap pushed up to a cycle high near 10.944 before pulling back to test support around the 7.065 zone. Back in mid-2026 it traded near lows of 2.317, showing strong recovery over the months. Historically, UNI hit an all-time high of 44.92 back in May 2021 and crashed down to around 1.03 during old bear market lows. My prediction is that holding this 7 support line could spark a bounce back toward 9. Do you think it will break past 10 next? About to liquidate! Yesterday, a whale opened a high-leverage long position of $101 million on $BTC / $ETH / HYPE / $ZEC and is now facing a floating loss of $1.725 million
30x $BTC long: floating loss of $709,000, with $398,700 liquidation buffer remaining;
15x $ETH long: floating loss of $378,000, with $86,140 liquidation buffer remaining;
10x $HYPE long: floating loss of $618,000, with $6,580 liquidation buffer remaining;
10x $ZEC long: floating loss of $205,000, with $38,280 liquidation buffer remaining. The meme is rising, and even when the official website can't be opened, it's explained as the team being hard at work. I really admire this kind of on-the-spot improvisation.
The logic still holds, but asking whether the chips are concentrated or if the pool is deep enough at this moment sounds like asking about divorce property division at a wedding—such a buzzkill. I also enjoy watching the hype around the meme, but the price surging and whether there are pitfalls in contract permissions are two different things.
Some discussions made me prepare a reply but then delete it. Well, asking about risks now requires picking an auspicious day first.After 7:30 Beijing time, global assets collectively declined. The core reason is the global repricing of funding costs (money has become more expensive), compounded by political uncertainties such as the U.S. midterm elections and the Middle East situation, triggering a broad sell-off from risk assets to safe-haven assets.
What you observe as "all assets falling" essentially reflects the market repricing for "high interest rates becoming long-term." Specifically, several factors resonated simultaneously:
💰 Core root cause: the "gravity" of the risk-free rate
· The underlying logic of "money becoming more expensive": The world is bidding farewell to the low interest rate era, with the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield approaching 5%. When the risk-free rate is high, all assets such as stocks, gold, and silver must reconsider funding costs and opportunity costs. Capital realizes that the expected returns from taking risks and speculating are not better than directly holding high-yield government bonds, so it chooses to withdraw from various assets.
· Failed rate cut expectations: The U.S. core PCE year-on-year remains as high as 3.1%, far from the 2% target, making it difficult for the Federal Reserve to cut rates in the short term. The market’s anticipated easing narrative has been completely reversed, becoming the core factor suppressing all asset valuations.
⚔️ Direct triggers: geopolitical and political uncertainties
· Repeated Middle East tensions: Iran stated that a ceasefire agreement with the U.S. is still "quite far" from being reached, and the U.S. has not fully responded to Iran’s demands. Previously, oil prices (Brent crude fluctuating above $100/barrel) had quickly fallen due to "peace expectations," but now they have become a variable disturbing inflation expectations again, causing market risk aversion to rise.
· U.S. midterm election watch: Policy uncertainty from election results leads capital to prefer staying on the sidelines, suppressing risk appetite. This cautious sentiment directly transmitted to the Asia-Pacific markets, with Japanese and South Korean stocks plunging sharply after opening. The South Korean KOSPI index fell nearly 2% at one point, breaking multiple support levels, and the Nikkei 225 index dropped over 3%.
🔍 Structural trigger: the "trust crisis" in the AI narrative
· Concentrated sell-off in tech stocks: Market doubts about whether massive AI capital expenditures can translate into actual returns continue to intensify. Coupled with widening credit default swap (CDS) spreads of tech giants and marginal tightening of financial conditions, capital is fleeing from overvalued semiconductor and AI hardware sectors. In the Japanese and South Korean markets, Kioxia plunged 11%, SoftBank Group and Advantest dropped over 7%, and SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics turned from gains to losses, reflecting this logic.
💎 Summary
When the risk-free rate (10-year U.S. Treasury) approaches 5%, capital demands higher risk compensation from all assets. At this time, repeated Middle East tensions push up oil prices and inflation expectations, further reinforcing the judgment that "high interest rates will last longer." Meanwhile, uncertainty from the U.S. midterm elections leads capital to temporarily stay on the sidelines. Geopolitical risks, political uncertainties, and AI valuation anxieties all point to the same direction—repricing the opportunity cost of capital. Until this macro logic is broken (e.g., significant inflation data decline, substantial easing of geopolitical tensions), the synchronized pressure on various assets may continue.Whale "Landlord" exposes short positions on three coins: unrealized profit of 7.24 million, funding fees collected nearly 12 million
On-chain monitoring shows that the whale known as the "Landlord" has updated perpetual contract positions: BTC, ETH, and SOL short positions running in parallel, with a total nominal position of about 640 million USD, leverage only 5-7x full position, strategy clearly leaning towards long-term funding fee earnings.
Breaking it down, BTC short position is 2319.6 coins, entry price 76366.1 USD, currently unrealized loss of 1.1849 million USD, but funding fees already credited 3.5374 million USD; ETH short position is 92,500 coins, entry price 2322.72 USD, unrealized profit 6.5669 million USD, funding fee income 4.5017 million USD; SOL short position is 696,100 coins, entry price 94.3346 USD, unrealized profit 1.8605 million USD, funding fee income 3.9493 million USD.
Total funding fees sum to about 11.9884 million USD, overall unrealized P&L approximately +7.2425 million USD, total margin about 86.419 million USD. Their liquidation prices are approximately 138,569, 3,786.92, and 292.55 USD respectively, with a large gap from current prices. Low leverage, high liquidation prices combined with continuous funding fees are key for this position to withstand volatility and collect cash flow.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $TRUMP looking at the market makes me want to laugh.
95% of the $TRUMP spot chips are locked in the market makers' hands, with hardly any circulating supply outside.
Meanwhile, a bunch of big short holders on the contracts are stubbornly holding on, with an average cost stuck around 1.83.
These shorts have no idea who they're providing liquidity to.
There's almost no selling pressure on the spot; as soon as the market makers push the price slightly above the cost line, the shorts' stop-loss orders will directly turn into market buy orders fueling the rally.
Just wait for the shorts to be forced to close their positions and help the price run up.
#TRUMP
$TRUMP
👇$DOGE order book volume keeps drying up as the price is hammered down, but every dip is instantly pulled back up.
Whales are quietly accumulating around 0.08, moving a solid 600 million coins into their wallets.
The spring is fully compressed, and with such strong support below, it’s a question of how many more days the bears can stubbornly hold on.
Once the market makers make a move, shorts at this level won’t even be able to close their positions.
#DOGE
$DOGE
👇Right now, the Bitcoin ecosystem isn't seeing much market activity, and many products look quite similar.
When the market heats up, problems will quickly arise. User numbers suddenly increase, wallets lag, index delays occur, balances show inconsistently, and transaction entry points easily get congested.
UniSat has been continuously updating the wallet page, transaction records, and signature process, while also integrating different protocols.
These are usually minor updates, but when the user base grows, reducing one signature or one operation step makes a noticeable difference in experience.
Market trends can bring users back, but how many stay in the end depends on whether these entry points can handle the load.
#UniSat #Bitcoin #BRC20After yesterday's rebound, Bitcoin dropped again. The short-term market did not break through the equal high at 78800, so during the day, pay attention to liquidity capture at the equal low of 76300.
If there is a false breakdown, the price must recover, and the recovery must be rapid with a large bullish candle body, leaving an FVG gap, before considering going long again. For specific methods, see the ICT teaching series by the chief. If it cannot pull back to 76300, then watch the support at 74700.
Currently, Bitcoin has two liquidity pools at 76300 and 78700. Before a crash starts, it is possible to wear down retail traders' patience by oscillating around these two levels, so just wait.
For Ethereum, support is at 2200, with resistance between 2350-2370.
In storage, SanDisk's movement yesterday met expectations. After the support-resistance flip at 1100, it pulled back to 1150 as given by the chief. In the short term, watch for liquidity capture at the low of 1070, or on the 15-minute chart, follow the same idea as yesterday by focusing on the support-resistance flip at 1110, then look for liquidity above at 1170 for a pullback.
Micron continues to underperform; watch support between 790-795. There is no short-term bottom signal in storage; going long is only based on short-term support-resistance flip logic or light left-side attempts. Short positions can still be taken at spots like false breakouts of equal highs.
In summary, Bitcoin's daily chart currently does not show consecutive bearish candles expanding the trend, so pay attention to short-term liquidity capture to participate in the market, namely BSL and SSL. The larger daily timeframe remains bearish.$BTC has dropped below 76,000! Historically, after midterm elections, Bitcoin usually experiences a big drop, so this is probably a temporary bottom!
The vote count is out, Democrats are temporarily leading, and North Carolina has flipped blue. The shoe has dropped, and now there's just one question: what will Bitcoin do after the election?
First, let's clear up a misconception: in the past three midterm elections, Bitcoin dropped sharply afterward. Except for 2010, when BTC rose 30.91% in the 30 days after the election, it was three drops and one rise in four instances.
In 2018, it crashed from 6450 to 3160, a 47.13% drop, coinciding with the BCH hard fork turmoil;
In 2022, it dropped 18.15%, and three days after the election, FTX went bankrupt. The election itself wasn't the cause, just a coincidence. Both elections and halvings happen every four years, and bear market bottoms generally occur 25-30 months after the halving, which happens to be near election day.
This year is different. According to the halving clock, the low point should have been between May and October, but it actually hit 57,718 on July 1, 125 days before the election. The expected drop happened early and is over. Now BTC is at 76,743, with 73,000 below as the short-term holder cost line.
I've kept 40% of my position to wait for the negative news to settle after the election; the bottom-fishing opportunity is here, so preparation is necessary. #美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ BTC is currently holding firm at the 76,000 level, with a small drop but extremely grinding. The current market is basically roasting all the bulls on the fire. First, let's see through the core contradiction of this wave of the market. The current price is exactly stuck between two extremely critical cost lines. Downwards, the overall average holding price of Strategy is $75,451, and BTC is now just 1.7% above this bottom line; upwards, the overall estimated cost of ETFs is as high as $81,500, and BTC is now nearly 6% below this. What does this mean? It means that big money is currently trapped, while the largest whales are still holding on desperately. There is heavy selling pressure from the ETF trapped positions above, and extreme defense from institutional bottom lines below. BTC is like the meat in a sandwich, stuck in the middle and unable to move. Looking at last night's US stock market, it looks good on the surface but is rotten underneath. The Nasdaq rose 0.83%, chip stocks rebounded, and AMD rose 3.65% in regular trading hours. But if you dig into the earnings reports, it's all fluff. AMD's Q3 revenue was indeed strong, with data center revenue up 97%, but the Q4 gross margin guidance actually declined. Advanced Micro Devices is even more of a joke: record sales, but gross margin plunged from 17.5% directly down to 12.7%, and operating cash flow had a net outflow of 434 million. What is this called? It's called revenue growth without profit! Doing AI hardware is all about losing money to make noise. This kind of fundamentals cannot support a sustained surge in chip stocks. The capital shifting from defensive stocks like Apple to chip stocks is at most a short-term rotation, not a big trend. If the Nasdaq is just a paper prosperity, BTC naturally cannot draw fresh liquidity. Tonight is the real deal