Orbit Post Sitemap
$AKE This 20x short position has a floating profit of 463% and I haven't moved it. Opened at 0.01166, now the price is 0.00896, this main downtrend phase has been fully captured.
Looking back at the chart, the 1-hour timeframe shows a steady decline from 0.01894, heavily suppressed by the moving average (VWAP 0.00936), with rebounds unable to reach the line. The 30-minute timeframe is even clearer: after the big bearish candle at 0.01242 broke through the consolidation zone, it’s been a volume-less downtrend, with the lowest wick at 0.00844, now hovering around 0.00894, down nearly 3% intraday. Holding the short is justified, as the rebound lacks volume, the highs keep dropping, and the chips are moving toward weakness.
But with a 463% floating profit in hand, I’m actually more cautious at the current level (around 0.0089). The low-level sideways movement without further drop indicates shorts are taking profits, and there is support at 0.00844. The order book is interesting: the long-short ratio slightly favors buyers at 52%-54%, with millions in buy orders supporting below, but there’s also a large 5M sell order at 0.00898, so bulls and bears are battling at this low level.
Next, watch the 0.00844 bottom: if it breaks down effectively and fails to recover, the bearish trend continues; if volume picks up and it closes back above 0.00936 (the average price line), this position should be largely taken profit. With 20x leverage, low-level sideways movement is the worst time to be greedy—take profits on the floating gains first, and let the remaining position follow the market’s direction.#Reddit暴跌近30%，AI搜索分流冲击显现 Honestly, when Reddit plunged nearly 30%, my first reaction was: the earnings report wasn’t bad at all, revenue even grew 53%, and profits exceeded expectations, so why did it crash? Then I looked at the earnings call content and understood—the market isn’t afraid of this quarter, but fears that the momentum might not continue afterward.
The two most painful things are: first, the Q4 guidance missed expectations; second, the user data looks a bit ugly, especially with US daily active users actually down 2% year-over-year. Even scarier, the CEO said that in October, traffic from Google Search dropped by over 1 million visits per week on average, and the decline is accelerating. The company also warned that if this trend continues, Q4 global daily active users might fall from 130 million to between 115 million and 117 million. Who wouldn’t panic hearing that?
To put it bluntly, Reddit used to rely on Google Search: users searched on Google, clicked into Reddit posts, then viewed ads. Now Google has AI Overviews and AI Mode, which directly summarize answers on the search results page, so users read the answer and leave without clicking links. The CEO put it very plainly: AI Mode doesn’t send traffic to us, and as far as I know, it doesn’t send traffic to anyone. Google used to be the gateway for traffic, but now it has become the final answer destination. This isn’t just about tweaking algorithms; it’s about the livelihood being passively taken away.
Reddit isn’t unresponsive; it said it will shift toward a login system and will first test it outside the US in Q4.
Dage is done $BTC 🔥Early morning data analysis! The truth is harsh: spot market hasn't really entered, it's all contracts hyping themselves up📊
Comparing spot and contract transaction volumes reveals the fake hype at a glance:
✅SOL: Spot 291 million｜Contracts 2.4 billion, spot accounts for 12.1% (highest among four coins)
✅BTC: Spot 1.81 billion｜Contracts 26.22 billion, spot accounts for 6.9%
✅ETH: Spot 867 million｜Contracts 12.31 billion, spot accounts for 7.0%
✅ZEC: Spot 219 million｜Contracts 3.04 billion, spot accounts for 7.2%
Total contract transactions across the network are 70.79 billion, seemingly high volume, but spot only accounts for just over 10%, showing a serious lack of real capital support.
Typical “low volume, stable positions”: transaction volume shrank by more than half, but total network open interest of 137.569 billion fluctuated only 0.66%, chips have not fled.
SOL single-day position surged 5.06%, incremental funds crowding contracts, while spot buying is slow to arrive; ZEC contract volume even surpasses SOL, hot turnover speculation, no one is taking spot positions.
Withdrawal window update: platform's first phase withdrawal channel closes in the afternoon, BTC, ETH, SOL networks gradually resume, ZEC still pending separate confirmation.
In short: the market rebound heat is just contract funds competing and speculating with each other, spot funds are watching and not entering.
In this market, I choose not to join this contract hype😌🔥BTC has rebounded above 78100, but the real test may still be ahead! This round of movement first swept liquidity around 76200, then quickly pulled back, followed by a slow rise, indicating there is still support at the low level, but it does not prove that the downtrend has ended.
📈 In the short term, BTC's liquidity area around 79500 can be watched. If the price continues to surge, it may first complete the liquidity test above; however, considering the heavier selling pressure at higher levels, I currently do not believe the market can easily sustain a breakout. The key is whether it can hold after the surge, not just the momentary spike.
🛡️ ETH is relatively strong; it did not break the short-term low yesterday, nor did it fall below 2200, with 2170 support currently effective. The next target is 2290; if obvious selling pressure appears upon reaching it, it may return to the consolidation range. Both bulls and bears need to avoid chasing highs or selling lows.
🐻 Regarding BTW, my view remains bearish, believing there is a risk of breaking below the 1 level, with long-term focus on 0.2. However, trend judgment is not a certainty, and not every rebound should be mechanically treated as a short signal.
⚠️ I am more inclined to view the next half month as a potential consolidation and shakeout period. Tonight's trading focus is to confirm BTC's surge strength, whether ETH can break through 2290, and whether BTW shows volume increase and strength. When rolling positions, be sure to keep enough margin; forced liquidation price control is only part of risk management, and large positions remain risky.
Who do you think will choose the direction first next? #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 On November 2, BTC was priced at $77,990, with a Fear and Greed Index of 34, still in the fear zone. The price is barely holding above 77,000, but the three ledgers tell completely different stories.
$BTC is around 77,990. Last Friday, ETFs saw a net outflow of $643 million, but IBIT attracted funds against the trend, with capital concentrating at the top. This week, the overall net outflow is about $202 million, with only IBIT receiving $176.9 million. 77,000 is the key defensive line, and 78,000 above is the first position that needs to be reclaimed.
$ETH is around 2,267. ETFs have had net outflows for 23 consecutive trading days, setting the longest record since listing. Traditional investors who made large purchases in August and September are now retreating. 2,200 is the line still supported by the market, and 2,300 is the first barrier above.
$SOL is around 95.5. On a weekly basis, it still recorded a net inflow of about $150 million, the strongest single week since October 2025; however, short-term cycles have seen net outflows for several consecutive days, with two forces tugging near 95. 92.34 is the nearest support below.
On the macro front, the midterm elections on November 3, the non-farm payrolls on November 6, and tech stock earnings reports all present a triple test in the same week. The expectation for a rate hike in December remains above 80%.
In short: BTC’s money is concentrating at the top, ETH’s demand is waning, and SOL’s funds are fighting among themselves. For these three coins, the wait is on whether the non-farm payrolls will provide a reason to ease.
This is for market record only and does not constitute investment advice.
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 $LIT This is a 50x long position with an unrealized profit of 908% currently held. Entered at 2.7463 and now at 3.2451, this wave has captured the main upward phase driven by strong capital inflow at the bottom.
The market structure is very solid: after bottoming around 2.8384 (with a lower point near 2.7463 on the 30-minute chart), it has steadily oscillated upward. The price has consistently climbed along the moving average lines (1-hour VWAP 3.2586, 30-minute VWAP 3.2704), with moving averages in a bullish alignment. After a strong rally to 3.3674, it met resistance and pulled back, currently consolidating near 3.245, with a slight intraday gain of 0.41%. The long logic at 2.7463 is very clear—continuous support at the bottom, progressively higher lows, a breakout followed by a non-breaking retest, and clear signs of accumulation by major players pushing the price up. Holding through the bottom is what earns the big gains, as shown by the 908% unrealized profit.
However, at the current level (around 3.245), I am starting to lean heavily towards defense. The long-short ratio shows selling pressure at 52%-58% and buying at 42%-48%, with sell orders pressing from above. The rebound met resistance at the previous high of 3.3674, showing signs of stagnation at the top. After falling from 3.3674, the price is entangled around the moving average lines, with volume not expanding in sync, indicating increasing willingness to take profits. With 50x high leverage and 908% unrealized profit, I will not allow a significant pullback.
The key is to watch the 3.20-3.22 support zone: if the price retests but does not break below the moving average line and buying continues, the trend can still aim for a breakout above 3.3674; if it breaks below 3.20 during high-level consolidation, decisively reduce positions to lock in profits. Courage is needed at the bottom, skill at the top, and with 908% gains, knowing when to take profits is even more crucial. I will continue to share real-time market insights, let's watch the show together.#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单
Revenue shows resilience, but profits are pressured by storage costs; Ternus's debut signals value beyond the numbers.
iPhone relies on volume and price cuts to support revenue. Goldman Sachs expects iPhone revenue of $56.561 billion, a 15% year-over-year increase, with shipments down 4% and average selling price up 20%; while industry shipments drop 20%, Apple's market share rises to 22.4%. Global sales in the first three weeks increased only 3.1%, with China up 29% contributing almost all the growth, while Japan and the US declined due to price hikes. This quarter only partially realizes price increase benefits but already bears rising memory costs.
Gross margin is a hard constraint. Guidance is 47%–48%, down from 50.1% last quarter. The cost of 1TB flash storage surged from $42 to $192. Service revenue is expected to grow 10% with a gross margin over 75%, serving as a buffer but insufficient to fully offset hardware costs.
Ternus's debut focuses on three points: transmission of storage costs, product roadmap rhythm (iPhone Duo, touchscreen MacBook), and how the AI narrative will be set after Siri's delay. He comes from a hardware background and has stated there is an "incredible product roadmap." If he provides a clear framework for cost trajectory, it will stabilize valuation more than single-quarter EPS. This quarter is likely to be "revenue pass, profit pressure, strategy to be tested."Historical stock performance in past midterm electionsAnalysis of Three Popular Coins: Road Building, Betting, or Speeding? 🔍
ONDO, INJ, and SEI each play a card, the scene is lively, but their bottom cards differ.
$ONDO moves RWA to Solana, with $45 million locked up, more like ecological infrastructure rather than dividends for token holders. No matter how wide the channel is built, the key is whether net capital inflow and redemptions agree. 💧
$INJ packages GPU rental fees into perpetual contracts, with 10x leverage betting on computing power prices. Imagination runs wild, but what’s traded is expectation, not physical assets; high leverage amplifies liquidation and liquidity fluctuations, and whether fees can sustain depends on real participants betting. 🎲
$SEI’s 200,000 TPS is the most eye-catching and also the easiest to get carried away with. SIP-6 is still just a proposal; governance, testing, and audits are incomplete, so on-paper speed ≠ mainnet performance; without applications and users, the fast lane may also idle. ⚡
This is only a project logic review and does not constitute investment advice; new narratives are hot but riskier, so view the cards rationally. ⚠️#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #加密行业协同守护资产安全 🔥 The most interesting part about ETH is here: the price pulled back from around 2171, but the real bottom signal in the market still needs further confirmation!
📊 Today's ETH quote is about 2264—2267 USDT, with a 24-hour increase of about 1.27%, and an intraday high of 2275.81. In the short term, it has climbed back above MA5 and MA10, the MACD green bars are narrowing, and KDJ is rebounding, indicating that the downward momentum has weakened. However, MA30 is near 2295, and whether this resistance can be broken will determine if the rebound can continue to expand.
🐋 From the perspective of capital behavior, many large funds are paying attention to the current area. Spot positioning and long attempts have also led to market expectations of bottoming. Personally, I think the area around 2100 is worth close observation and may even become an important defense zone in this round of adjustment, but it should not be regarded as an absolute price that will not be broken.
⚠️ The capital situation is not easy: ETH ETF has had net outflows for 23 consecutive days, with over 1 billion USD outflow in October; in the contract market, short liquidations are about 1.43 million USD, long liquidations about 2800 USD, and the negative funding rate also indicates that bearish sentiment still exists.
🎯 Today's key focus is whether 2295—2300 can be effectively broken through, with upward targets at 2374 and 2448; on the downside, watch closely 2213—2200, 2175, and the 2122—2130 liquidation zone. The liquidation risk of the remaining 56,700 ETH held by whales has not yet been eliminated. #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 $ZEC and ZEC are currently in a phase where the price narrative is clearly disconnected from the network fundamentals. What drove it to around $1270 was not a genuine surge in privacy demand, but marginal institutional buying after the ETF channel opened; meanwhile, the NU7 upgrade is about to be implemented, but fractures in community governance are creating internal uncertainty.
The real source of price strength: capital flow, not usage
After falling from a high near $1700 in September, ZEC found support around $1200 and is currently oscillating around $1270, with a market cap of about $21.5 billion. On the surface, it looks like a strong "corrective drop," but breaking down marginal buying reveals that pricing power is shifting from on-chain users to fund products.
CoinShares’ European ZEC product ZCSH saw a net inflow of $41.1 million in the week ending October 23, the strongest single-week performance since mid-September; however, in the previous three weeks, the product had a cumulative outflow of $143 million — the one-week inflow only recovered about one-third of the prior losses. The narrative of continuous net inflows into spot ZEC ETFs like Grayscale does exist, but the scale is not yet enough to declare a "return of privacy demand." Binance reopened ZEC withdrawals on November 1, officially described as "responding to increased user demand," but this is a change at the trading infrastructure level and does not equate to an expansion of actual usage on the shielded network.
A more direct signal comes from whale behavior: an address accumulated 25,000 ZEC at about $425 two months ago and recently liquidated at about $1514, taking profits of around $27 million. While institutions are buying on the ETF side, early large holders are cashing out on the spot side; this chip exchange structure is worth noting.
NU7 Upgrade: Real technical progress, but not to be linearly extrapolated as a valuation re-rating
The NU7 upgrade, activated around November 5, is the most substantial protocol upgrade for ZEC in recent years: block time is compressed from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, the theoretical throughput of Orchard shielded transactions increases from 2.9 TPS to 6.6 TPS, and confirmation experience moves from "waiting a minute" to "almost instant." At the same time, to maintain issuance pace while speeding up, the halving interval is extended from 1.68 million blocks to 5.04 million blocks; the 21 million total supply cap and halving mechanism remain unchanged, with 98.9% of voters supporting retention of the halving schedule.
However, there is a gap easily obscured by the narrative: speed upgrades do not equal demand surges. What really needs verification post-upgrade is whether node switching is smooth, whether actual usage of shielded transactions follows capacity increases, and whether on-chain fees and activity improve. If actual usage remains low despite the 6.6 TPS capacity, the technical improvement cannot be directly translated into holding value. NU7 provides the infrastructure condition that "privacy payments become usable in experience," not the demand itself.
Governance controversy: short-term price disturbance, long-term institutional cost issue
The community grant controversy is the most immediate internal risk source. Zcash Community Grants (ZCG) allocate part of miner rewards to fund ecosystem projects, but some large holders believe this process lacks token holder voting constraints. One major holder has announced a full exit, causing a noticeable change in the holding structure, with the price retreating to the $1220–1245 range after failing to break through $1390.
This issue needs to be viewed on two levels. In the short term, whale exits and governance uncertainty suppress risk appetite, likely amplifying volatility around NU7’s launch. In the long term, ZEC’s 20% developer funding model (8% community grants + 12% retroactive grants) is indeed the institutional foundation for its continuous technical iteration during the prolonged bear market; Grayscale also explicitly views this as a positive factor. But whether this model can persist depends on the community finding consensus between "having money for R&D" and "having constraints on how money is spent." Current divisions indicate this consensus is not yet solid.
A conditional judgment framework
ZEC’s privacy attribute is caught between structural demand and regulatory headwinds. On one hand, after privacy coins significantly outperformed the market in 2025, institutional allocation demand (such as Multicoin Capital’s disclosed ZEC position) and the narrative that "confidential finance is key on-chain market infrastructure" continue; on the other hand, delisting risks, AML pressure, and hostility from banking channels are unavoidable constraints in this sector.
Therefore, views on ZEC are hard to categorize simply as "bullish" or "bearish." A more appropriate framework is to monitor several verifiable signals:
· On-chain data after NU7 activation: whether the proportion of shielded transactions continues to rise from the historical high of 30%, and whether fees and active addresses improve in line with capacity;
· Sustainability of ETF inflows: whether products like ZCSH can convert single-week inflows into continuous net subscriptions over several weeks, rather than a brief rebound after prior losses;
· Convergence of governance disputes: whether the grant mechanism introduces token holder constraints, and whether whale exits trigger broader chip loosening.
Until these signals become clear, ZEC’s price more reflects capital pricing the "privacy + institutional allocation" narrative rather than network fundamentals having been fully validated.#AppleQ4iPhone18Outlook Here is your ready-to-post content in English for *#AppleQ4iPhone18Outlook*:
---
*Apple Q4'26 Earnings Tomorrow (Nov 2) - What to expect:*
Apple is set to report $113B in revenue (+10.2% YoY) & $1.98 EPS.
The real story: iPhone 18 Pro / Pro Max launched Sep 18 with A20 Pro 2nm chip + Apple Intelligence push. Early demand is strong (China +29%), but Apple itself warns of intensifying supply constraints on iPhone, Mac & iPad and a 2.5% FX headwind$DOOD The DOOD project team is clearly signaling they're about to dump?
The treasury just moved 690 million tokens to the exchange, and in 11 days there's another wave of team unlocks coming to dump.
What's even more ridiculous is the market depth — the buy orders are as thin as paper, with barely any orders below to catch the sell-off.
With this kind of supply hanging overhead, if the whales casually dump a bit, there's no support underneath.
It's a pure cliffhanger moment; whoever's inside is getting crushed.
#DOOD
$DOOD
👇On the surface, it looks quite stable, but underneath it's quietly changing breath. Is the hustle and the support really the same thing? Going through the data these past couple of days gives a very subtle feeling: BTC didn't crash after the $630 million hack incident; whales absorbed 1,900 coins; ETFs have had net inflows for four consecutive days; Strategy holds 840,000 coins and is still preparing to raise funds to keep buying. Sounds like a group is throwing a party on the ruins, right? But what I'm focusing on isn't these pretty numbers, but the untold line behind them — cross-market linkage is becoming awkward. First, the signals I see. The fear and greed index dropped to 30, yet volatility surged; these two happening simultaneously means the surface price is stable, but internal pricing is conflicting. The $140 million BTC from the hack remains untouched like a sword hanging overhead; $150 million in liquidations just passed, everyone knows it could fall at any time. ETF money is coming in, but that's slow money, allocation money, unable to catch sudden panic selling. Looking at ETH, a staking rate of 36.11% indicates long-term holders haven't fled, which is quite touching as a commitment. But ETFs are continuously seeing net outflows, and the EIP-7702 upgrade is even questioned for security loopholes. Staking locks in faith, but outflows represent real cash pricing power, a tug of war between the two. SOL is even more typical: RWA surged to a record 5.19 billion, the Alpenglow upgrade has landed, the narrative is clearly strengthening, yet the price fell below 95, wiping out 1.52 billion longs, and ETFs are also withdrawing. Basically #AMD财报前瞻：HeliosAI系统商业化进展 The market now looks at AMD not in terms of "whether there is AI growth," but whether it can continue to deliver under a high base, the volume ramp of Helios racks/Instinct GPUs, and the progress of Meta's large order fulfillment. Last quarter, data center revenue doubled year-over-year, but because the next quarter's guidance missed the most optimistic expectations, the stock plunged immediately after hours. This is its biggest characteristic: expectations are set very high, and not exceeding them = easy to get crushed.
Four key indicators to watch (priority order)
1. Data center revenue (primary core)
Last quarter 6.7 billion, accounting for 58% of total revenue, the only growth engine; key points: shipment rhythm of EPYC server CPUs, Instinct MI300 series, Helios rack systems, as well as delivery progress of Meta's 6GW collaboration and confirmed order amounts.
The market is most sensitive to: whether GPU deliveries are affected by export controls, yield rates, and supply bottlenecks.
2. Gross margin (determines valuation elasticity)
Target benchmark 56%. High GPU costs, foundry price increases, and inventory expenses all eat into gross margin; gross margin holding steady or rising is a solid positive; good revenue but declining gross margin is a bull trap, prone to high open and low close.
3. Client + gaming business (drag factor)
Ryzen PC CPUs are okay; gaming GPUs and semi-custom business remain weak, unlikely to contribute surprises, as long as they don't continue to decline sharply, it's considered passing.
4. Next quarter guidance I reviewed the data early this morning and will first characterize the market: spot trading is absent, contracts are self-hyped.
Let's lay out the spot trading proportions first: SOL spot trading volume is 291 million versus 2.4 billion in contracts, about 12.1%, the highest among the four coins; BTC spot is 1.81 billion versus 26.22 billion in contracts, about 6.9%; ETH spot is 867 million versus 12.31 billion in contracts, about 7.0%; ZEC spot is 219 million versus 3.04 billion in contracts, about 7.2%. 📊
I've said before, don't call it a downturn too soon. Calculating spot proportions confirms the same point: total contract volume across the network is 70.79 billion, which looks large, but the highest spot proportion is just over 10%, meaning those actually taking delivery haven't kept up. 😏
The volume drop aligns with stable positions: total network volume is 70.79 billion, down more than 50%, but total network positions are 137.569 billion, only moving 0.66%. Positions haven't dispersed despite volume cooling; those taking delivery aren't following, contracts are playing their own game. SOL positions increased 5.06% in one day, the strongest, but buying volume didn't keep pace.
One more point worth highlighting: ZEC contract volume is 3.04 billion, surpassing SOL's 2.4 billion, turnover is hotter than actual delivery, the excitement isn't on the spot side.
On the Binance side, the first phase withdrawal window closed this afternoon; BTC network was the first to open, ETH network followed, SOL network confirmed recovery by evening, ZEC is still on the initial list awaiting separate confirmation.
So my judgment remains unchanged: no spot delivery, contracts self-hyped, I won't follow this wave of hype. 😌#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 He comes from a hardware background, having long managed hardware engineering, with strengths in supply chain and product implementation; but the market is focused on two major issues:
1. AI progress: Apple's AI rollout pace is slower than peers, which is the biggest constraint on its valuation;
2. Foldable iPhone: The long-delayed foldable screen is his first flagship product since taking office, determining the market's judgment of him;
3. China market: Intense competition, high-end Android pressure, requiring continuous efforts to maintain market share. The Binance hacker incident actually has a greater impact on $ETH.
The hacker has already converted a large amount of stablecoins and other stolen tokens into $ETH, currently controlling about 510,000 ETH, approximately 1.15 billion USD, and 18,270 BTC.
For the hacker, BTC serves as reserve assets; most BTC stolen in the past have remained nearly dormant in inventory.
However, ETH simultaneously serves as the settlement asset for the hacker to exchange other illicit funds.
At the same time, due to the hacker's massive borrowing and purchasing of ETH, they have become a huge holder of ETH.
In the future, the hacker will inevitably transfer, split, and liquidate this batch of ETH, which is a further blow to ETH holders.ETF fund flow direction has changed: institutions withdraw first, don't rush to bottom-fish
The latest US spot $BTC ETF saw a single-day net outflow of $643 million, wiping out the gains from the previous four consecutive days of inflows in just one day. ETH is even weaker, with a single-day net outflow of $156 million and five consecutive days of net outflows. This is not a retail-driven sell-off; essentially, institutions are adjusting their positions.
Previously, with the FOMC holding steady, institutions continuously bought BTC; after the PCE data release, rate hike expectations heated up, and funds immediately shifted. ETF subscriptions and redemptions are the most straightforward institutional vote: continuous inflows indicate bullishness, continuous outflows indicate caution or even bearishness. Now BTC ETF has only just turned to outflows for one day, but $ETH ETF has had five consecutive days of outflows, indicating institutions are even less confident in ETH.
Next, keep a close eye on ETFs: if net outflows continue, BTC still faces downward pressure; only when sustained net inflows reappear will it look more like a confirmation of a phase bottom. Don't guess sentiment, watch the money.
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #加密行业协同守护资产安全 $BTC $ETH $ZECThrough the Fog of Cycles: Examining the "Growth Paradox" and Value Reconstruction of Stablecoins from Circle's Financial Reports
In the wave of digital finance, every financial report released by Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) is not just a disclosure of financial data from a few companies, but a barometer for the entire stablecoin industry and even the evolution of global internet financial infrastructure. Reviewing the period from 2025 to early 2026, especially Circle's journey from a successful IPO to the release of its Q4 2025 and full-year financial reports, I deeply realize that behind the seemingly impressive growth figures lies a complex tension among technology implementation, regulatory battles, and commercial monetization. This in-depth study of Circle's financial reports has given me a more multidimensional understanding of the core question: whether stablecoin growth can truly deliver returns $ETH Ethereum faced a delisting crisis back then; can CORE become the second Ethereum?
First, clarify the facts: In the 2016 The DAO hacker incident, the delisting threat was faced by the application-layer DAO tokens, while the underlying ETH never encountered a delisting crisis on mainstream exchanges. The root of the crisis was solely the The DAO contract vulnerability; Ethereum's underlying consensus remained intact. The hard fork decision involved multi-party negotiations among miners, nodes, and token holders, with the vast majority of hash power and developers choosing the main chain. The ecosystem base was sufficiently diverse, successfully weathering the split storm. In contrast, the nature of Core's current turmoil is completely different: it exposed a consensus-layer vulnerability in the validator reward mechanism, resulting in about 69 million CORE tokens being prematurely released and unrecoverable. South Korea's Bithumb officially announced the delisting of the CORE native token citing underlying mechanism risks. The project subsequently launched a zero-downtime handover with the founding contributors stepping down and block production rights transferred to 31 validators, but the handover mainly covered block production operations. The underlying code iteration and treasury governance still bear core team influence, and the stake weight distribution behind the 31 validator seats lacks transparency. The two are at clearly different stages and ecosystem maturity: when Ethereum faced the fork crisis, it had already gathered global developers continuously deploying applications; although Core emphasizes the BTCFi narrative, its on-chain ecosystem self-circulation capability has not yet fully matured. Ethereum survived primarily because the crisis was resolved through collective decision-making by diverse participants across the entire network; Core's current governance transformation is more of an organizational restructuring after the crisis and has not yet experienced separation from the core team BTC and ETH are about to face policy tests! The U.S. midterm elections correspond to three different market scenarios
With the U.S. midterm elections approaching on November 3, control of Congress may change. The Nasdaq, BTC, and ETH will all face a repricing of policy expectations, but this time the party victory or loss cannot be simply equated with price rises or falls.
I focus on three scenarios:
First, the Democrats take both chambers. Congressional checks on government policy strengthen, regulatory and fiscal policy uncertainty may rise, and short-term risk assets face volatility pressure.
Second, a divided Congress emerges. If Democrats take the House and Republicans hold the Senate, major legislative progress may be blocked, and the market may first digest uncertainty before repricing based on policy impact.
Third, Republicans continue to control both chambers. Expectations for policy continuity increase, risk appetite may be supported, but whether the positive factors can drive the market depends on capital flows and the macro environment.
Morgan Stanley recently expects Democrats to have a better chance of taking the House, while the Senate race is highly competitive. My judgment is: election results may trigger short-term volatility, but what truly determines the midterm trend of BTC and ETH remains Federal Reserve policy, dollar liquidity, and institutional capital flows.
Don't bet on election results; focus on trading the expectation gap. $BTC #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 #Palantir Earnings Preview: Can High Growth Support a High Valuation $AAVE AAVE's current situation is completely an open card supporting the price.
The gap of 128,000 coins stolen from Binance has not been filled yet, the hole is right there, and the platform can only honestly keep placing buyback orders on the exchange.
The pit created by the hacker has directly turned into the strongest forced buy orders.
As long as this account is not settled, the buyback orders below cannot be withdrawn, and the shorts trying to top at this time are purely saving money for the exchange.
#AAVE
$AAVE
👇My BTC long position cost is 77,480, with a 30% position size and a stop loss at 76,200. I will post these three numbers exactly as they are after today's close. Follow me for daily public real-position holdings, opening reasons, and stop loss levels. Whether holding or cutting losses, I write it truthfully; deleting posts means I lose.
There's not much to say about today's market: BTC at 78,013, 24-hour volatility 0.5%, ETH at 2,268 up 0.8%. Making directional trades with this volatility is luck if you profit, and fees if you lose. I'm more focused on another line — SAFU transferred in 7,499 BTC, 90% of stolen assets recovered, and reserve proof addresses updated. These three events basically have zero impact on tonight's price but significantly affect the exchange's credit pricing. The market's discount logic for centralized exchanges over the past two years was "can you let me withdraw smoothly?" Now it’s shifting to "can your reserves be verified by a third party?" This is a slow variable but more valuable than a single bullish candle.
So I don't plan to add to this 30% position. Above 78,000 is a dense trading zone with insufficient volume; a breakout upwards is likely false. Below, from 76,000 to 76,500, there is still an unfilled gap. Let it choose a side on its own; I'll follow after a breakout. Meanwhile, I'll hold spot to earn interest during this grinding period.
At this position, are you holding your 30% waiting for a pullback, or going all in betting on a breakout?
Follow me for daily public real-position holdings and stop loss logic, and I write truthfully even when losing.
#OKXProphet Sunday Night Market Watch: Bulls Are Too Crowded, Be Cautious Overnight
Late Sunday night, the market again shows a "ready to take off" posture, but the review data is not favorable.
🔸$BTC is at 77930, seemingly stable on the 1-hour chart, but the 4-hour long-short ratio is as high as 2.43. Weekend trading is light, but leverage hasn't retreated; bulls are clustered waiting for the Monday overseas market to lift the price; with such a heavy load, the main players may not be willing to lead with real money.
🔸$ETH is at 2266, long-short ratio 2.33, funding rates intermittently turning negative, indicating that bull confidence is unstable and they are even willing to pay costs to exit at any time. Once the market weakens, it’s hard for ETH to lead the rally and it’s more likely to weaken first.
🔸$SOL is at 94.97, long-short ratio 3.45, bulls stubbornly defending around 95. When liquidity is thin, if BTC breaks down, SOL risks dropping to 93 and triggering a chain liquidation.
In short: positions held stubbornly over the weekend often only close at Monday’s open; when direction is unclear, staying out of the market is also a proactive choice. Did you keep your positions tonight? Are you bullish or bearish? Is tomorrow more likely to first lure bulls then crash, or directly plunge?
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 #Meta信用展望转负，AI投资信用风险受关注
From the recent market trends, it seems the narrative around $META has shifted from "AI darling" to "heavy asset investment phase."
From the end of Q3, cash and short-term investments dropped to $44 billion, a nearly 40% year-over-year shrinkage. The $70 billion capital expenditure has already consumed over $30 billion of existing cash. If capex increases by another $50 billion next year, there will be a significant gap in the current cash pool.
Additionally, Meta is currently trading at about 15 times the expected EPS for 2027, which is more than one standard deviation below the 10-year average, placing it in the fourth extreme undervaluation range in the past decade.
This means the "relatively cheap" valuation bottom is real, but the premise is that the 2027 EPS (Morgan Stanley benchmark about $36) can be realized.
Is there room for a rebound? First, we can note the midterm elections.
Looking back at the past 23 midterm election years, the S&P 500 rose within three months after early October in 21 of them. Since 1950, the average gain from election day to the end of June the following year is 15.5%.
However, it is important to note that the Federal Reserve acts as a counterbalance. Currently, it is a "hawkish pause," with interest rates maintained at 3.75%-4%.
Yet, futures markets price in over an 80% chance of a rate hike in December; a rate cut is not the baseline scenario. As a high-valuation growth stock, Meta's rebound potential will be compressed under rate hike expectations.
Meta's short-term rebound range may correspond to 17-18 times the 2027 EPS, approximately $615-$650, which is about a 15-20% recovery from 15 times. Note the risks!A reminder to those still blindly shorting: don't rush to hit the button 🧊
$ETH perpetual funding rates have turned negative, shorts are starting to pay, and the shorting crowd is clearly crowded; the whole network's 24-hour forced liquidations have dropped from over 17 billion to around 5 billion, and there has been no stampede of cascading liquidations.
My bias remains bearish, but "bearish" does not mean "chase shorts now." Negative rates combined with liquidation exhaustion often mark the moments with the strongest rebound elasticity — the most comfortable position for shorts is often the easiest to get hit ⚠️.
Experienced players at the table don’t go all-in just because they have good cards; the same goes for bearish views, no need to rush to full position now. Wait for a rebound, wait for the longs to pay for their emotions again, then move more steadily. Waiting empty-handed is not a lack of opinion, but saving bullets for a more comfortable position 😌.
This does not constitute investment advice.BTC and ETH may face directional choices next week! With the U.S. midterm elections approaching, who will become the biggest market variable?
As the November 3 U.S. midterm elections near, market focus is shifting from macro data to control of Congress. The Nasdaq, BTC, and ETH could all be affected by changes in policy expectations, but what truly determines the market trend may not just be which party wins, but the gap between the results and market expectations.
I believe three scenarios deserve close attention:
First, the Democrats win both chambers. Policy differences between Congress and the White House may widen, increasing uncertainty in regulation and fiscal policy, which could pressure risk assets in the short term.
Second, a divided Congress. Policy progress is blocked; the market may initially digest the uncertainty, but if the results meet expectations, a recovery rally could follow after panic subsides.
Third, the Republicans hold both chambers. Expectations for policy continuity strengthen, potentially supporting risk appetite, but whether this translates into a price rally depends on whether funds truly enter the market.
Notably, Reuters reported on October 29 that betting markets have priced in over a 60% chance of the Democrats controlling both chambers, indicating some political expectations may already be priced in.
My view is: do not bet prematurely on the election outcome; instead, watch the Nasdaq trend, the U.S. dollar, U.S. Treasury yields, and BTC spot fund flows. The real trading opportunities may arise after the results are finalized, during the market’s re-pricing of expectations. $BTC #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 This gold rally has also turned from a decade-long bull market into free fall! $XAU
From the weekly chart, gold has dropped from around $5,600 to $3,876, with a maximum drawdown exceeding 30%, even breaking below the weekly bull market support zone!
Looking back at the previous bear market from 2012 to 2016, gold's maximum drawdown was about 45%, lasting over 4 years! And this bull market also lasted nearly 10 years. Will history repeat itself again?After the black swan shock, BTC fell below $78,000, and market bearish sentiment intensified, but some whales still maintain a bullish outlook. Trader Jason Leo believes that $58,000 may be the bottom of this cycle and plans to reposition long positions in the $76,000–$78,000 range, with a target of $120,000 within the year. I also tend to maintain a medium- to long-term bullish view, but not by blindly following whales; rather, there are several signals in the current market structure worth noting. First, the $76,000–$78,000 range is an important demand observation zone. Glassnode data shows the average cost for active market participants is about $77,900, and the short-term holder cost is about $75,800, meaning the current price is close to the key cost area for some holders. If it can hold steadily, it may form a new support base. Second, market corrections do not mean the bull market structure is completely broken. On October 30, the US spot BTC ETF saw a net outflow of about $643 million in one day, indicating capital pressure, but this also means it is important to observe whether institutional funds will flow back later. My strategy is: not to rush into full positions directly at the support area, but to wait for price stabilization and volume improvement before considering phased entries. If it can firmly hold above $78,000 again, the next focus is around $85,000; if it effectively breaks through and holds above higher resistance zones, then $120,000 can be further discussed. From $77,500 to $120,000, the increase is about 55%, which is not an easy target. $58,000 isThe NYSE parent company ICE is bringing Hyperliquid perpetual contracts into the US. After deleting and reposting the announcement, they deliberately bolded "pending approval."
The key to this drama isn't the cooperation itself; it was officially announced on October 29: ICE exclusively operates, TradeXYZ handles the product, and Hyperliquid provides HIP-3 technology.
The real new information is the November 1 repost: the old post was deleted and reposted with more cautious wording, essentially pouring cold water on the market.
The data also plays along: on the day of the news, HYPE surged up to 15%, today’s current price is about $87.6, with only a 0.15% increase in 24 hours; BTC is around $77,929, ETH about $2,265.
I think this is not a positive breakout but the starting gun for a compliance marathon—until the CFTC gives the green light, the so-called "US perpetual" remains just a prospect.
Wall Street is willing to enter, but regulatory approval is another matter.
Which side are you on: ICE’s entry is the arrival of the regular army, or just another round of the old routine "pump first, approve slowly later"?
$HYPE $BTC
#Hyperliquid #PerpetualContracts#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 Apple’s new CEO, Tim Cook's successor, has received the first performance report for the iPhone 18. This time, the strategy is very straightforward, focusing on the high-end Pro models and foldable screens, raising the average product price and prioritizing profit protection.
The initial launch phase looks fairly good in terms of hype, but there are reports from the supply chain about adjustments in orders for some models, causing the market to start doubting whether consumers can continue to accept this high price.
In the short term, the focus is on two things: whether on-device AI can truly stimulate everyone to upgrade their phones, and whether the foldable screen is a genuine hit for early adopters or just a short-term hype wave. These two points are the key tests to see if Tim Cook's successor’s strategy can succeed in the long run.20261101
1. JPMorgan doubts the price stability and is hesitant to buy BTC
1. There is a figure called volatility, which measures how much the price can fluctuate up and down within a day. It is used to calculate risk. Bitcoin's annual volatility is 55%, but currently it is measured at 25.2%, less than half. The quieter it is, the more big money dares to enter.
2. Inside Wall Street, there is a chart that still shows 55%. The higher the risk estimated on the chart, the less is allowed to be bought. In every bear market 📉, BTC falls from its peak. Previously it adjusted by 84%, 77%, and this time 54%, each drop shallower than the last.
3. The bottom is at 60,000, not 40,000, with a group of people holding above. Those who bought between 85,000 and 108,000 have costs around 100,000. They want to sell as a set, so the 100,000 barrier is the hardest to break. Only after this group exits can the price gain strength to rise.
4. In the long term, whether it can surpass 100,000 depends on how volatile it is in a day.
2. American enthusiasm for buying BTC is at a four-year low
1. The last time it was this low was in November 2022, the week of the FTX collapse. BTC bottomed at 15,500, and more than a year later it rose directly to 73,000, so many people are now calling for a bottom.
2. Coinbase premium refers to the price difference between the US and the rest of the world. Americans rush to buy, making it more expensive there. Before Binance opened withdrawals, arbitrageurs couldn't move, and half of this price difference is due to machines not transferring, not because people are afraid to buy, but because machines haven't completed transfers.What deserves the most attention about ETH right now is not just the price, but the severely imbalanced position structure among whales. According to this set of ETHUSDT perpetual contract statistics, among 1,036 whale addresses, 706 are short and 330 are long, with a nominal long-short ratio of only 29.80%. The gap in capital scale is even more obvious: long positions total about $427 million, with an average entry price of $2,759.90; short positions total about $1.43 billion, with an average entry price of $2,238.41. The short capital size is about 3.35 times that of the longs, but at the current price of around $2,259, the average holding costs on both sides are at disadvantageous levels. This means the market is not simply a short squeeze. Although shorts hold a capital advantage, if the price continues to rebound, they may face covering pressure; although longs are smaller in scale, if key support holds, it could also trigger short stop losses. Technically, around $2,170 is a recent important support, with ETH's low on October 30 reaching about $2,174; resistance to watch above is $2,290. If volume breaks through $2,290, the short-term structure is likely to improve; if it falls below $2,170, further downside should be watched for. My judgment is: in the short term, it is more suitable to observe range breakouts rather than blindly follow whales' trades. Whales can also misjudge, and position management is always more important than directional judgment. Before the market confirms, controlling leverage and preserving capital is far more valuable than betting on one-sided moves. $ETH #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 On the third day after Binance's incident, funds began shifting from "safe haven" to "value." $UNI continued to rise 4.4% to $7.31, up 18% for the week. The logic remains the same: DEXs are capturing market share from CEXs, and protocol fees are being introduced into TokenJar for burning.
$AAVE has been repriced in the past two days, with enterprise-grade fixed-rate Stable Vaults launched, adding a B2B narrative. The lending sector rose 7.25% in 24 hours, outperforming the broader market. Ultimately, this rebound is not a blanket rally; money is choosing assets with revenue, products, and buybacks. Although meme coins are also rising, funds clearly prefer assets "with calculable valuations."
$LIT surged 19.5% to $3.26, firmly holding the top spot in gains, with an FDV reaching $3.4 billion. The story of this coin is typical: in November, it plans to formally submit a DCM/DCO license application to the CFTC. Once approved, it will be a compliant on-chain perpetual in the U.S., allowing institutional capital to enter. But on the other hand, it's strict: 50% of the team and investors' tokens are locked until December, then released linearly over three years, with selling pressure written into the contract.From the perspective of capital flow, $BTC spot and contracts are simultaneously experiencing net inflows. This capital resonance makes the trend extremely resistant to decline, indicating that the market's preferred long position remains BTC.
Although $ETH is showing gains on paper, spot funds are flowing out, mainly due to contracts pushing prices up unilaterally. Looking at the 15-minute chart in the screenshot, signs of stagnation at high levels have appeared. If spot outflows continue to expand, a sharp short-term drop and shakeout could easily occur.
$SOL's capital situation is weak, with obvious net outflows in contracts and minimal spot support. The market is also suppressed below the moving averages, consolidating weakly, making a significant short-term rebound unlikely.
In contrast, some altcoins (such as ZEC) are seeing contract funds withdraw while spot support exists, structurally making them slightly more stable than SOL. However, selling pressure is not yet resolved, so blind chasing of highs is not recommended.
In summary: BTC's base is stable, ETH needs to guard against false breakouts; SOL continues to bottom out. The focus going forward is not on who has the largest gains, but whose spot buying can sustain, as that represents a genuine rebound backed by real money.
The above is for personal reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Data changes in real time with the market; please refer to the latest data.
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 Double 11 promotion, various coins are on discount, do you accept the promotion?
Prices are rising, but the order book is selling: BTC sell wall pressing down, ETH hacker stolen funds on the way, LIT leads with an 18% increase
$BTC price has pulled back, the sell wall hasn't been cleared
It has gradually recovered from the low point after the Binance hack. But the order book direction is wrong: dense sell orders are stacked above, the rebound relies on short covering rather than active buying. 78,000 to 78,500 is the current battleground between bulls and bears; if the sell wall isn't eaten away, the recovery is just a correction
$ETH hacker's ETH hasn't been sold yet, ETF ran first
Binance perpetual sell orders are 49.15 million, 1.7 million more than buy orders, and spot sell orders are also relatively heavy. More troubling, the FBI confirmed about $6 billion of stolen funds mainly converted to ETH for money laundering, with hundreds of Ethereum addresses flagged; this batch of chips will be sold sooner or later. Coupled with ETF net outflows for 23 consecutive days and $1.61 billion withdrawn in October, 2,283 is the first resistance, 2,214 is the support below
$LIT leads altcoins, but liquidity is a double-edged sword
Up about 18% to $3.19, it is the strongest altcoin on Sunday. Small-cap coins are easily pushed up by small buy orders when liquidity is thin, and the tolerance for chasing highs is much lower than mainstream coins
Summary: For BTC, watch if the sell wall at 78,000 to 78,500 is eaten away; for ETH, focus on the 2,214 support and hacker stolen funds movement; for LIT, see if volume can shrink after expansion without breaking the pullback. What rises is the price, what doesn't rise is the buying volume
#美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 Three days ago, everyone was betting on whether Binance would collapse.
The answer is out: it didn't collapse.
Withdrawals have fully resumed, BTC did not retest the bottom; instead, it climbed back from 76,000 to 78,000. The top ten coins are 100% fully supported, so where is the claim that net losses account for 2% of reserves?
No bank run occurred. The market voted with real money.
But the real story is not about Binance.
The attackers still hold 420,000 ETH and 18,270 BTC, worth about $2.4 billion. 325 million USDT has already been sold at a 10% discount to market makers, exchanged for 122,300 ETH.
They are laundering money, not hoarding coins.
Look at another number: Gate perpetual contract volume was 5.6 billion three days ago, 3.4 billion yesterday, and 1.2 billion today, shrinking by 78%.
No one dares to go long, and no one dares to go short. Everyone is waiting for when that $2.4 billion will be dumped.
The thunder has stopped, but the rain hasn't fallen yet. #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 Apple’s new CEO, Tim Cook's successor, has received the first performance report for the iPhone 18. This time, the strategy is very straightforward, focusing on the high-end Pro models and foldable screens, raising the average product price and prioritizing profit protection.
The initial launch phase looks fairly good in terms of hype, but there are reports from the supply chain about adjustments in orders for some models, causing the market to start doubting whether consumers can continue to accept this high price.
In the short term, the focus is on two things: whether on-device AI can truly stimulate everyone to upgrade their phones, and whether the foldable screen is a genuine hit for early adopters or just a short-term hype wave. These two points are the key tests to see if Tim Cook's successor’s strategy can succeed in the long run.#Qatar mediates US-Iran talks, oil prices still supported by conflict risks Seeing this news, I can only say: the Middle East chess game is really full of twists and turns.
Qatar is acting as a peacemaker again, trying to get the US and Iran to sit down and talk. It looks like good news, right? Logically, once negotiations start and the fighting stops, oil prices should drop a bit.
But look at the current market, oil prices are stubbornly high and just won’t fall.
Why? Because everyone knows very well. In the Middle East, while hands are shaken at the negotiation table, there might be bad intentions brewing under the table. The deadlock between the US and Iran has lasted for years; it’s not something a few words from Qatar can resolve. The market simply doesn’t believe they can reach an agreement.
As long as this issue isn’t completely resolved, Iran’s oil fields and the Strait of Hormuz shipping lanes will always hang by a thread. Capital fears this "what if" the most. What if talks collapse one day, or some careless missile flies, and crude oil supply suddenly gets cut off? Won’t oil prices skyrocket?
So right now, besides normal supply and demand, the crude oil market is also paying a very expensive "war insurance premium." Who dares to short oil at this critical moment? That’s just asking for trouble.
We ordinary people need to understand one thing: what’s being speculated on in oil now isn’t fundamentals, but emotions and geopolitics.
Once oil prices are firmly supported by this conflict risk and can’t fall, US inflation won’t come down, and the Federal Reserve won’t dare to cut interest rates easily. One thing leads to another, and in the end, we stock and crypto investors have to pay the price.
At times like this, don’t chase the oil price surge.
$BTC Bitcoin is not stuck because the market has run out of things to say. It is stuck because the things that matter are pulling in opposite directions, and none of them has yet won. $BTC continues to chop in a range, and the longer that lasts, the more the eventual move will be decided by positioning rather than narrative. Start with macro. The Federal Reserve's December rate debate remains unresolved, and that ambiguity carries directly into crypto. Real yields and a firm dollar are headwinds for Since Buffett's holdings are public, why does no one follow and buy?
Because whether retail investors or big players,
no one values such returns.
Investment master Harry Browne designed a permanent portfolio.
The rules are ridiculously simple:
Broad J index, gold,
long-term government bonds, currency base J, each buying 1/4.
If any rises to 35%, sell a bit.
If it falls to 15%, buy a bit more.
Always pull back to 4 equal parts.
When the economy is good, stocks charge for you.
When inflation comes, gold bears it for you.
When recession hits, government bonds cover you.
When everything crashes, currency
funds can still buffer you.
Even during the 2008 financial tsunami-level blow,
this portfolio only dropped 2% HYPE surged from around 75 to over 90, and the group chat got lively again. But despite the excitement, I checked the data and found that things aren't that simple.
The 24-hour trading volume skyrocketed by 680%, but breaking it down, the contract trading volume was $13.47 billion, while spot trading was only about $1 billion. What does this mean? This rally is mainly driven by the contract market fighting it out, not real money buying spot. Open interest in contracts surged to $4.02 billion, meaning directional bets are heavily stacked. When prices rise, shorts get squeezed out, helping push the longs; but if the direction reverses, liquidations will cascade.
The direct trigger for this rally is that ICE, the parent company of the NYSE, signed an agreement with Trade[XYZ] to launch a compliant perpetual contract market in the US, using Hyperliquid's infrastructure as the base. Meanwhile, Druckenmiller said he invested in Trade[XYZ], and Musk replied on X with "Interesting."
The key detail is: ICE bought equity in Trade[XYZ], not HYPE tokens. Druckenmiller also invested in the company Trade[XYZ], not HYPE. The price surged sharply those two days because the market was betting that "once the compliance channel opens, Hyperliquid will capture more trading volume." They are betting on expectations, not on facts that have already happened. Continuing to oscillate back and forth in the 77000–78000 range, $BTC $ETH 😄 the fear and greed index has somewhat rebounded
The biggest feature now is that neither bulls nor bears have retreated, but no one can make a decisive call
The bulls refuse to surrender, funding rates remain positive, about +0.0074% to +0.01%, and the proportion of long positions in all market accounts is still close to 73.5%
This means that many leveraged longs were liquidated during the decline, but the weight of the position hasn't lightened much
Overall liquidation volume has significantly contracted from the peak a few days ago, and the market is transitioning from a phase of intense deleveraging to low-volatility competition
The technical structure is very clear: above, the dense trapped positions and moving averages between 78000 and 82000 form layered resistance, making a smooth rebound difficult in the short term; below, 76000–77000 is the near-term long defense line
On the macro level, with the election window approaching and repeated interest rate hike expectations, the liquidity environment is tight
Against the backdrop of positive funding rates, uncleared longs, and unresolved macro uncertainties, it is advisable to wait for a volume breakout on either side of 76000 or 78000 before making a directional choice #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧 Apple will release its earnings report after the U.S. stock market closes on November 2. My baseline judgment is that this quarter will most likely deliver results close to expectations, but the guidance for the next quarter may not satisfy the market. Both judgments can hold true simultaneously: Apple still has strong product competitiveness, but rising costs are genuinely eroding profits. This corresponds to the third quarter of the 2026 calendar year, referred to as FY2026 Q4 in Apple's financial report. The current market revenue expectation is about $113 billion to $113.6 billion, with EPS around $1.98 to $1.99. Apple's previous revenue growth guidance was 9% to 11%, corresponding to approximately $111.7 billion to $113.7 billion. In other words, the market has basically prepared based on the upper end of the guidance. Simply meeting the guidance won't bring much surprise. What is more noteworthy is that the market expects revenue growth of about 11%, but EPS growth of only about 7% to 8%, indicating that cost pressures have already been factored into analysts' models. Many worry whether rising memory prices will cause Apple to repeat Intel's post-earnings trajectory. Let's clarify Intel's situation first. Intel's recently announced quarterly revenue and adjusted EPS both exceeded expectations, but the main issue lies in the guidance for the next quarter. Weak PC demand, supply constraints, and cash expenditures have collectively lowered market expectations for future profitability. Apple might also experience a combination of acceptable current quarter performance but weaker outlook for the next quarter. However, the cost structures of the two companies differ greatly: Apple has high-end products, service revenue, and inventory buffers, while Intel must bear the pressure of its own manufacturing system, so the situations are not directly comparable. Apple's gross margin#توقعات Palantir Earnings Report: Can High Growth Support the High Valuation?
Palantir Faces a Forecast Test
Markets are awaiting Palantir's results tomorrow, November 2, with revenue growth expected around 84% and earnings around 95%.
But the key question is not whether it will beat expectations, but whether the growth will be enough to justify the high valuation?
The main idea: strong results may not be enough; raising future guidance and continued growth in AI contracts are the keys to the stock's rise. Any disappointment in guidance could open the door to a sharp correction.BTC fell below $78,000, is the bull market logic failing? I am more focused on these three signals
Recently, BTC quickly dropped from around $84,000, hitting a low of $76,300, losing the important psychological support at $78,000. But I believe that a single break below a key support is not enough to directly conclude that this bull market has ended.
From a cycle perspective, I still tend to believe BTC is in a correction phase of a new long-term upward cycle.
$58,000 can be considered a hypothetical reference for the bottom of this cycle, rather than an absolute bottom that has been confirmed. If BTC can stabilize above $78,000 again and gradually break through previous highs, $118,000 will be a medium- to long-term target worth watching. After further space opens, $150,000 can also be included in bull market scenario projections.
But short-term capital conditions still require caution: on October 30, the US spot BTC ETF saw a single-day net outflow of about $643 million, indicating institutional capital support has not yet recovered.
Next, focus on three signals: whether $76,000–$78,000 can form effective support, whether ETF funds can shift from net outflow to sustained net inflow, and whether price rebounds are accompanied by healthy trading volume.
My view has not changed: do not deny the long-term trend because of one breakdown, nor confirm the bull market restart because of one rebound. What truly matters is the opportunity validated by both capital and price confirming the trend. #美股与金银同步大跌，避险资金流向分化 $BTC #美联储官员释放加息信号，12月预期仍存分歧
The Federal Reserve signals a rate hike, theoretically bearish for BTC. But the market is not simply about whether there is a rate hike; the key is whether this statement will be more hawkish than the market expects.
US Treasury and dollar cash yields rise, BTC itself has no interest, the opportunity cost of holding BTC increases, and funds flow from high-risk assets to risk-free US Treasuries.
If the rate hike expectation has already been priced in, the actual implementation may even lead to a rebound. The macro economy is only one factor; more depends on observing the facts.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #加密行业协同守护资产安全 近期美联储鹰派声音明显升温，加密市场的流动性预期也随之承压。值得注意的是，市场正在从此前的降息交易，逐渐转向对进一步紧缩的防范。 10月30日，圣路易斯联储主席穆萨莱姆公开表示，进一步收紧货币政策可能很快就有必要。达拉斯联储主席洛根则认为，当前政策利率仍不足以有效抑制通胀，并提出至少再加息两次的观点。虽然官员意见不代表美联储已经形成统一决策，但政策分歧本身就增加了市场的不确定性。 数据更值得警惕：9月美国核心PCE同比上涨3.1%，高于8月的3.0%，距离美联储2%的通胀目标仍有明显差距。与此同时，12月加息25个基点的市场定价在10月31日已升至约69.8%。 风险偏好降温也反映在加密市场。10月24日至30日，BTC周跌幅约5.8%，ETH跌幅约8.5%，说明当前市场对宏观紧缩预期的敏感度正在提高。 我的判断是：短期不宜仅凭超跌就认定反弹行情已经启动。高利率预期会抬升无风险资产的相对吸引力，并压缩高波动资产的估值空间。 接下来重点关注三个信号：美联储官员是否继续强化紧缩立场、核心通胀是否出现实质性回落，以及BTC能否重新站稳关键价格区域。 如果鹰派预期继续升温，而资金流入又无法改善