Orbit Post Sitemap
$HYPE Paradigm directly unlocked $224 million worth of $HYPE staking in two days.
Retail investors are still trying to bottom-fish and find support, while a16z is already rushing to move hundreds of thousands of chips to the market makers.
A big wave of unlocks is queued up to dump soon.
Entering and holding firm at this time is purely acting as a liquidity ATM for the big holders cashing out.
The buying power has long been overdrawn; the bulls simply can't hold at this level.
#HYPE
$HYPE
👇$MRVL just took a quick bite to eat, then came across this post by a cultivation master and the MRVL K-line chart, and I almost sprayed my screen with my noodle soup. This metaphor is on par with "Ma Huateng wanting to pay salaries with Q coins"—a god-level analogy, hitting the nail on the head!
【Hardcore review of this "getting something for nothing" move】:
Look at the daily chart in image 2, dropping straight from 278 to 171, a nearly 40% decline! All moving averages are in a bearish alignment, MACD dead cross deep in the water zone. This drop is totally justified.
Marvell, with a market cap of 200 billion, acquired the 100 billion old bread (Lumentum) without paying cash, instead playing a crazy stock issuance game of "4.5 shares for 1 share." This is akin to paying salaries with Q coins—the essence is using one’s "virtual chips" during a high valuation period to exchange for solid core assets.
The market voted with its feet, showing capital what "faith collapse" means. You exchange paper for real assets, so everyone can only smash the market to crush your "paper" back to its true form. The meme in the picture saying "hold for 10,000 years and see" is a perfect piece of dark humor.
【My advice】:
Using the most virtual stocks to buy the hardest assets ends with the harshest smash. Before elections, all funds are running away; never catch a falling knife in targets with deteriorating fundamentals and valuation restructuring. Let this "Q coin-style" acquisition’s bitter fruit be digested slowly by itself.People tend to mistake the ability to quote prices on weekends as a risk control upgrade, but I am actually a bit cautious: having an additional price signal doesn't necessarily mean more stability.
Chainlink states that Aave Horizon uses perpetual contracts to provide weekend pricing for stock collateral. Thinking about it the other way, I don't consider it a safety net: first, I speculate that if contract noise enters the valuation, it could amplify collateral pressure; second, the quotes don't guarantee that there will be someone to take the seized assets. I am more interested in how it filters noise rather than just whether the quotes are online.Still relying on institutional accumulation news to justify going long?
BTC is currently at 76827.6, with MA20 at 80468.8; if the resistance isn't broken, all the positive news could just be a facade. Strategy spent 65.5 million to add 811 BTC, but repurchased preferred shares at a cost of 208 million.
Each treasury has completely different approaches. Metaplanet is increasing its position in BTC, BitMine is aggressively acquiring 8573 ETH, bringing its holdings to 6.06 million.
Institutions building positions in batches doesn't mean they'll pump the price immediately.
ETH has no independent trend. When BTC drops sharply, ETH falls even harder; when the market recovers, it can only follow along to gain.
Many only see accumulation but overlook the underlying debt and financing costs. Companies have their own cycles; they aren't here just to support retail investors.
The previous low at 74896 still hangs below. If the positive factors can't hold, the decline won't be gentle. $BTC $ETH #Strategy回购规模超购币三倍，财库策略转向？ Does $OP's multi-chain security anxiety weaken the expansion efficiency of the OP Stack? Sharing the tech stack can reduce deployment costs, but the security responsibilities and liquidity between different chains still need to be clarified. If new deployments bring new users, fees, and developers, the collaborative value of the OP ecosystem is enhanced. The opposing view is that an increase in the number of chains causes asset fragmentation; if new chains rely mainly on subsidies and users do not stay, expansion actually increases maintenance costs. Evaluating the activity and cross-chain settlement quality of each chain is necessary; the number of deployments cannot be equated with network revenue. When further confirming, I will separate the impact of news, capital flow, and real usage for examination; only if at least two of these remain aligned across multiple periods will I adjust the mid-term judgment. If only short-term price or a single indicator changes, I will remain cautious and wait for subsequent data. #US Midterm Elections Are Approaching, Which Results Are Worth Watching?
Tonight Americans vote not for a person, but for who will hold power for the next two years.
Today is November 3rd. All 435 seats in the House of Representatives are up for election, 35 of the 100 Senate seats are contested, and 36 states are electing governors. Before the election, Republicans hold 218 seats in the House, just a majority, Democrats have 214 seats; in the Senate, Republicans have 53 seats, Democrats plus allied independents have 47 seats.
The most important to watch is the House of Representatives. Democrats need a net gain of just 3 seats to reach 218 seats. Polls and ratings lean more seats toward Democrats. The Senate requires a net gain of 4 seats to achieve a majority, which is much more difficult, so the possibility of a House flip is greater than the Senate.
For the market, the key is not who wins a slogan, but whether Congress is divided or unified. If Democrats take the House, it will be harder to advance legislation in the president’s second term, policy uncertainty will rise first, and capital often waits and watches, setting direction after results are certified and the new Congress is sworn in.
Early voting has already set records. As of the morning of November 2nd, about 54.8 million votes have been cast by mail and early in-person voting, exceeding about 45.9 million in 2022. The Cook Political Report’s October 23rd rating lists 219 seats leaning Democratic, 198 leaning Republican, and 17 toss-ups. The average congressional vote poll shows Democrats leading by 8.9 percentage points.
The market does not fear the results, only the wait without results.$ZHIPU
A while ago, I said the AI sector hadn't peaked yet. Today, the Zhipu token dropped 8.1% in 24 hours, trading at 56.69, just over one point above the daily low of 55.66. My face hurts a bit.
On the same day, Wall Street was arguing among itself. On one side, asset management giants warned that AI is a bubble; on the other, investment bank executives said spending in this area could reach $15 trillion over the next decade, and the Blackstone president also said computing power demand far exceeds supply.
After listening to both sides, I don't really believe either. They're debating something that will only have answers ten years from now; what I care about is tonight's market.
The Zhipu contract market is too small, with open interest only $3.14 million, fee settlement at -0.046%, shorts paying, yet the premium is still positive at 0.44%. I don't believe this market reflects smart money; a few hundred contracts can move the price by two or three points.
An 8% drop doesn't mean institutions are exiting, and a rebound doesn't mean they're coming back.
This month, I've changed my stance on this sector so much that I'm annoyed with myself. I'll just keep quiet and watch the market. I'll talk about direction again when open interest reaches tens of millions of dollars.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ Bitcoin is trading near $76,813, and the market cannot agree on what that number means. Galaxy reads the move back above the 50-week moving average as evidence that the bottom is in. Rekt sees the same chart and reaches the opposite conclusion: resistance at $78,500 has held, the downtrend remains valid, and the next level below is $76,000. Two credible desks, one price, two irreconcilable verdicts. That divergence is the real story, because it tells you positioning is still unresolved rather th$SNDK
Nasdaq will switch to 23-hour trading starting December 6. This news was buried among a bunch of AI headlines today; I had to read it twice.
The SNDK token is currently priced at 1091.2, down from 1178.7 24 hours ago, a 7.4% drop, and only about $20 above today's low of 1069.2. On the same day, SK Hynix fell 5.3% in 24 hours, while SK Group's Chey Tae-won is proposing that South Korea and Japan collaborate on AI and semiconductors.
The news is positive, but the market is cold. At times like this, I usually ignore the news and watch the market.
Token holdings are at $123 million, down from $137 million at midnight, a decrease, but no one is really dumping. The fee rate is still at +0.015%, so longs are still paying. The problem isn't the drop, it's that no one wants to take the other side.
Once Nasdaq truly switches to 23-hour trading, the only selling point for token stocks—that "I can still trade after US stock market close"—will fade. People buying this now are betting on the time difference, not the company.
I'm done with this direction. When the day comes, we'll see whose positions remain.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ The ChiNext Index hit a new low, but the historical pattern hasn't been broken yet. Currently, the main decline in the market is still in semiconductor and technology-related stocks, while the main gains are in the old leading stocks. For example, Kweichow Moutai has risen up to 28% from its low at the end of June. Mindray Medical has risen up to 44%, which was the main theme of the last bull market, having fallen for 5 years and recently started to perform.
If you want to bottom-fish, I don't recommend technology-related stocks; prioritize indices first, then old leading stocks.
The index rebound might be driven by the old leading stocks, so if you pick the wrong sector, you could still lose money even if the index rises.
The polarization in the A-share market is very severe; a 10% loss requires a forced stop-loss. Although this often results in mistakes, it definitely prevents major losses.
Regarding gold, based on previous performance around midterm elections, the gold market is expected to start after the midterm elections, which is on November 3rd Eastern Time, 13 hours later than our time. From a technical perspective, gold is also oversold, but after the drop, it hasn't risen in the morning, indicating the central bank hasn't intervened. The central bank usually acts in the morning. However, starting to dollar-cost average at this position likely won't lose money before the end of the year.There's something quite divisive: Nvidia's B300 chip rents for $7.56 an hour, about 56% more expensive than at the start of the year. With such high demand, companies involved should be snapped up, right? Yet the hottest trade in the market is buying their decline.
CoreWeave's stock price is $55, and the hottest options are puts expiring in 2028 with a strike price of $35. The cost of default insurance for Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta has also hit its highest level since 2021. $BTC is just watching from the sidelines, barely moving.
So is computing power just too expensive, or is everyone afraid it won't be worth this price in the future? The risk of this AI wave was first priced not in stock prices, but in bond insurance.
The cost of debt default protection for Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and Oracle has risen to the highest level since 2021. Investors and tech companies themselves are buying options and CDS, hedging against debt default and computing power depreciation.
Look at a specific trade. CoreWeave's hottest option is a put option expiring in 2028 with a strike price of $35, while its stock price is about $55. The strike price is twenty dollars below the current price, which is not short-term protection but insurance bought for two years later.
The contradiction lies on the other side: Nvidia's B300 rental price has risen about 56% this year to $7.56 per hour. Computing power prices are still rising, indicating demand hasn't collapsed; but capital is buying downside protection, indicating concern not about no business now, but about prices dropping after high-priced contracts expire.
Jump Trading has even set up a computing power trading department to help clients hedge against computing power depreciation. With derivatives on computing power, it becomes a commodity that can be priced bidirectionally. $BTC and $ETH are priced by liquidity and are actually more stable than AI in the short term.
The signal is not that AI is over, but that valuations are constrained by debt costs: a 56% rent increase signals demand, while record-high default insurance signals financing; both appearing simultaneously means expansion relies on more expensive money. Once computing power can be shorted, the pricing logic of coins like $TAO will inevitably change.Conclusion first: The $ARB Security Council just proved one thing — on Arbitrum, your money is not entirely protected by your private key. In the early hours of November 3rd, without obtaining the hacker's private key, it froze and moved $30 million. Some media described the entire process as taking only 10 minutes. This was the fastest on-chain response in the recent $6.3 billion Binance hack, and also the most chilling.
On the same day, Binance began the second phase of withdrawal recovery, with net outflows estimated by media between $3.6 billion and $5.8 billion; the FBI accused North Korea, which denied the allegations; analysts said hackers laundered $242 million through Tron, and the FBI is interrogating THORChain.
But $ARB's market did not price in this "good news": current price is 0.1531, down 4.6% in 24 hours, down 24.9% in 30 days, with a market cap of only $1.05 billion, and $ARB perpetual positions on OKX are only $13.14 million.
My view: Being able to trace stolen funds on-chain is certainly a skill, but the premise of this skill is a multisig that can bypass your private key. When your money is on L2, "impossible to be taken away" was never a promise.
Would you put your assets on a chain where "if something goes wrong, they can move your money for you"? $ARBThis week's macro analysis part three: The U.S. midterm elections, who will control Congress? Republican vs. Democrat, different outcomes bring different short- and medium-term risks! The voting phase of the U.S. midterm elections officially ended on November 3. Next comes a month-long period of vote counting, tallying, election result certification, and the transition between old and new legislators. As of now, statistics show that the probability of the Republican Party becoming the majority in the House of Representatives is only 5%, and the probability of majority in the Senate is only between 20% and 25%. Currently, the Democratic Party clearly holds the advantage, and that advantage is still expanding. Trump's situation is very unfavorable. From 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM Beijing time on November 4, voting in all U.S. states officially ended. Before that, Trump still had several swing states to contest in order to try to increase the Senate win rate; otherwise, Trump faces the prospect of losing control of both chambers of Congress. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ Current swing states: South Carolina, North Carolina, Maine, Arizona, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin. Among them, Iowa, Maine, South Carolina, Wisconsin, and Arizona are currently held by Republicans, North Carolina by Democrats, and Texas is temporarily vacant. In this election, Trump faces these swing states. Except for Wisconsin and Arizona, which are not participating in re-election voting, the other states should be prioritized based on their weight: Texas, Iowa, Maine, South Carolina, and North Carolina. Texas + Iowa, one is a red state stronghold, the other has Democrats leading by only 1%, these two ETH continues to weaken, and the market is generally bearish, which is the result of multiple factors resonating across macro liquidity, fundamentals, capital flow, and technical aspects. The core reasons can be broken down into the following points:
1. The deflationary engine of the token economy has directly stalled
Currently, the base fee on the Ethereum mainnet is only 0.06 Gwei, far below the "burn-mint balance line" of 13.63 Gwei. The entire network has a net daily issuance of about 2,954 ETH, corresponding to nearly $7 million in new selling pressure. The once "scarcer with more use" deflation narrative has completely failed. On-chain activity seems stable, but the token burn per transaction is close to zero, breaking the transmission chain between network usability and token scarcity.
2. Core upgrade benefits fall through, ecosystem enters reshuffle period
The highly anticipated Glamsterdam upgrade (which planned to raise the mainnet Gas limit from 60 million to 200 million) was directly halted due to contract vulnerabilities found during security audits. The December mainnet launch window has closed with no new clear timetable. Meanwhile, the L2 ecosystem is broadly declining, with TVL of leading projects shrinking significantly, flagship applications migrating back to the mainnet, and the incremental narrative of the Layer 2 ecosystem completely failing, leaving no new demand to absorb selling pressure.
3. Institutional funds continue net outflows, buying support completely absent
The US Ethereum spot ETF saw net redemptions exceeding $1.6 billion in October alone, with daily outflows peaking over $100 million. Institutional funds continue to withdraw from ETH, instead flowing into BTC, which has clear buying support. #ETH触及2500美元后震荡 Seeing traditional assets being put on-chain again, I have a bit of a sense of déjà vu from the last cycle: everyone is talking again about what else can be supported on-chain besides native assets. This time, at least there are concrete data: Solana disclosed that the tokenized stocks of SK Hynix have reached a trading volume of $500 million so far, with over 10,000 holders.
I prefer to see this as a validation of on-chain asset supply rather than the engine of a new cycle. Unlike just talking about on-chain space, this time both trading volume and holders have scale; but the transaction amount is not net inflow, so we cannot judge that new money has arrived based on this. The popularity of a single asset does not directly prove that the entire tokenized stock sector is running smoothly.
In my view, this news is more significant for the asset issuance side than for the overall market sentiment. If more assets can continue to generate trading in the future, then the logic of on-chain as an asset distribution channel will be more solid. I will first see if this demand can be replicated and am not in a hurry to call for a cycle shift.Historically, the Nasdaq and S&P have delivered excellent returns after the US midterm elections.
Recently, the US stock market experienced a sharp decline, and the fear index reached an extreme level. From a technical perspective, the Nasdaq's 200-day moving average can be simply used as a long-term entry reference point.
The original plan is to buy Nasdaq spot in batches, extending the cycle. No one can predict where the bottom is. If you avoid the decline, you will most likely miss out on the subsequent surge. Choosing to buy those assets that will definitely rise later during the decline is the easiest way for ordinary people to make money. Crypto Market Three-Line Observation: Rates, Whales, and Forks (¬_¬)
$BTC is currently at 77,783, with a fear index of 30. ETF net outflow in a single day is $643 million, while derivatives exposure has actually expanded, and the funding rate remains at +0.0074%, meaning longs are still paying. Deleveraging is not over; the rebound looks more like short covering rather than new capital attacking. The upper target is 78,000 for recovery, 76,000 is the bottom line, and next we watch when the funding rate will "give up" (｡•́︿•̀｡).
$ETH is at 2,266. Spot ETFs have had net outflows for 23 consecutive days, setting a new record; however, a giant whale withdrew 34.69 million USDC from Kraken and bought 15,216 ETH on-chain at an average price of 2,279. At the upper level of 2,347, there is $477 million in short liquidation, while 2,143 is a minefield for longs. Whale buying pressure and ETF selling pressure—who will blink first? (ง •̀_•́)ง
$ZEC is at 1,243. The NU7 hard fork activates on November 5, reducing block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, but the price dropped from 1,400 to 1,243, a typical "buy the rumor, sell the fact" scenario. 1,200–1,180 is recent support; breaking below that points to 1,100–1,050.
In short: BTC watches the funding rate, ETH watches 2,143, and ZEC watches whether 1,200 holds. Don't rush, the market is forcing answers (￣▽￣)ノ
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ 🔥 In this round of BTC decline, who is making money and who is bearing losses? Smart money position data provides a very intuitive answer: currently, shorts dominate and longs are clearly under pressure.
📊 Statistics show that there are 2,930 traders in BTC USDT perpetual contracts, with a nominal long-short ratio of 21.82%. There are 1,120 longs holding 693.03M USDT, with an average entry price of 84895.68, and a profit ratio of only 7.76%; there are 1,810 shorts holding 3.17B USDT, with an average entry price of 76143.25, and a profit ratio of 73.14%.
📉 The gap between the two sides is very obvious: the proportion of profitable longs is low, while the proportion of profitable shorts is high. Short-term shorts temporarily hold the initiative. However, this is only the current platform's statistical sample and cannot be directly equated to the real capital distribution of the entire market.
🐳 Another detail worth noting: when a large number of shorts are already in profit, if there is a concentrated take-profit afterward, the market may also see a rapid rebound. So while being bearish, one cannot ignore the risk of reverse volatility.
🎯 BTC short-term focus is on 76000 support and 79000 resistance. My strategy is to treat it as a range-bound market first, not blindly chasing orders, nor holding positions for a long time lightly. The truly effective direction requires price to break through key areas for confirmation.
The market is not about who has the largest position winning for sure; those who can control drawdowns are the ones who last. Do you think the next step will test 76000 first or push to 79000? #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ The meme circle was flooded with a dinner event this week, but prices didn't rise; instead, they fell. DOGE, PEPE, TRUMP—one is working on products, one is burning out on sentiment, and one is cutting supply. All three are retail sentiment thermometers, but there's a huge difference in who has something to hold onto people.
$DOGE is the "most product-active" among the three. MyDoge released V3, added swap and DogeOS entry points, and merged the three into Dogecoin Labs. The DogeOS testnet is still being pushed; it has the thickest liquidity in the meme sector and acts as the ballast stone of the segment. Stable but not flashy, it’s slowly building with products, more reliable than pure sentiment plays.
$PEPE is still propped up by high turnover, but its momentum has cooled. Its trading volume stands out even against big tokens, but high turnover doesn’t equal lasting demand. The strong rebound after Binance was hacked on October 29 has already faded. PEPE has popularity but lacks functionality; it pumps up quickly but dumps just as fast. I don’t chase short-term spikes that rush too hard.
$TRUMP is the "most bottomless" of the three; even the dinner event can’t save its price. The second dinner is set for November 22, with a snapshot on November 12, but after the announcement, the price didn’t rise and instead fell about 8% from the rating starting point. Circulation is only 282 million, accounting for 28% of the total supply; the rest is released by affiliated companies on schedule, leaving very little from its historical highs. My stance: TRUMP is a supply machine, the dinner is just hype, and I won’t touch it.
For meme tokens to rise, it depends on who has products to hold people. For something like TRUMP that only leaks supply without holding, the dinner event is useless. Big Brother Maji is back at the table, this time putting his entire net worth on a long position in Ethereum. Leveraged to the max, his lifeline hangs just a step away from the current price. This kind of on-chain open card is worth watching more than any indicator.
According to Hyperbot data, he is currently holding a 25x long position of 2,725 ETH, with an average entry price of 2,263, a mark price of 2,250, an unrealized loss of $35,000, and a liquidation price of 2,227, less than 1% away. What does this have to do with me? It’s exactly the position I’ve been repeatedly talking about these past two days: I only consider adding to my position if ETH holds above 2,300, and Big Brother’s lifeline at 2,227 is just below this support. He’s not my weather vane; he’s the first domino blocking my buy point.
The impact is direct: the whole network can see his position, and the bears will definitely hunt for 2,227. If it really drops there, the chain reaction of liquidations will cause a spike, ironically delivering a spot buy opportunity right to me; if he holds through, the short squeeze fuel increases.
So my strategy remains unchanged: hold the spot base position, don’t chase above 2,300; never gamble with contracts on his life, wait for the liquidation cascade to finish and the right side to stabilize before entering. Others bet direction with 25x leverage, I only profit from his volatility, not follow his position.
No need to guess with an open card, just wait.#On-chain tokenized stock scale hits new high, traditional financial institutions accelerate layout
The leader has something to say
The circulation scale of on-chain tokenized stocks has reached about $3.8 billion, breaking records for 10 consecutive weeks. On the product side, Securitize added 13 tokenized US stocks on Solana, covering McDonald's, Disney, and Uber. On the infrastructure side, the NYSE partnered with Broadridge to provide on-chain shareholder voting and transfer services for tokenized stock platforms.
I believe this marks the transition of RWA from hype to real infrastructure implementation. The comment section mentioned that Ethereum-based tokenized stocks grew 170% year-on-year to $827 million. Wall Street is moving the core mechanisms of equity rights and clearing transfers onto the chain. Once the infrastructure is complete, the entry barrier for traditional financial capital will be completely removed.
But don't expect a short-term pump. Infrastructure building is a slow variable. Today SOL rose slightly by 0.12%, SECZ fell by 0.79%, and capital reacted calmly. BTC is still fluctuating between 77,000 and 80,000, with all funds waiting for this week's Nonfarm Payroll and CPI.
Let's see if BTC can retake 80,000. If it can't hold, expect a deeper correction, with resistance above at 84,000 to 85,000. Don't chase the rise or kill the dip; set your orders with stop-loss properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; orders must have stop-loss set. Good luck. $BTC $BTC $ZEC $OFC This fw project team, the entire Polymarket collaboration, issued 25 million coins, distributed to 16,000 people, and 10,000 people have not received theirs yet. After checking, basically all were sniped by bots, dropping the price from 0.008 to 0.005 like that. There are pictures and evidence. The airdrop was also stolen by bots, rewards were stolen too, trash.After the US midterm elections, $BTC fell in the first three times.
In 2014, it dropped up to 46% within 71 days
In 2018, it dropped up to 50% within 39 days
In 2022, it dropped up to 15% within 13 days
The 2026 election day is coming again
Will history repeat itself? #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？
Today’s midterm election is a short-term sentiment amplifier for the crypto space, not a direct reversal button.
The market is already weak, and volatility will increase around the election results.
Short term: mostly disruption, risks remain
Bitcoin continues to be weak today, around $76,600, hitting a more than one-month low.
The market is currently under three layers of pressure: election uncertainty + ongoing impact from the Binance large-scale hack + weakness in tech stocks.
Mid term: key focus on the CLARITY Act and control of Congress
This midterm election mainly decides control of both houses of Congress and will not directly change the White House.
If the Democrats expand control, progress on crypto market structural bills like the CLARITY Act may slow, making regulatory-friendly legislation more difficult.
If the Republicans maintain control of Congress, the Trump administration’s push for crypto-related legislation will proceed more smoothly.
However, the stablecoin framework GENIUS Act has already passed, so the short-term regulatory direction won’t reverse overnight.
Market outlook
Don’t treat the election as a "guaranteed bullish signal." Historically, Bitcoin has rebounded after midterms, but this is more related to the four-year cycle, liquidity, and ETF fund flows, not simply the voting results.
In the short term, watch fund flows and key levels:
Support zone at the lower side around $74,800–$77,000;
On the upside, Bitcoin needs to reclaim $80,000 and see ETF funds flowing back to confirm sentiment recovery. $BTC $ETH I believe Circle's Q3 earnings report will not exceed expectations, mainly for four reasons:
1. Revenue expectations are too high. The market consensus is about $790 million, a 12% increase from Q2's $701 million, requiring significant business growth to achieve.
2. The scale of USDC is key. Circle mainly earns interest from USDC reserves; even if on-chain transactions become more active, it doesn't mean revenue will grow proportionally. At the end of Q2, USDC circulation was $73.3 billion. If the average scale in Q3 does not rebound significantly, revenue growth lacks support.
3. Limited contribution from interest rate hikes. The 25 basis point rate hike in mid-September only affects the last two weeks of Q3 revenue. Based on a $73 billion reserve scale, the additional interest income is about $7 million, which is hard to fill the nearly $90 million revenue increase.
4. New businesses are temporarily unable to play a major role. Other income in Q2 was about $34 million, less than 5% of total revenue. Although Arc and the payment network have long-term development potential, commercialization takes time and is unlikely to bring significant revenue contribution within one quarter.
#Circle財報在即，穩定幣成長能否轉化為收益？ Here's a different way of thinking:
What if the Democratic Party wins both chambers? What happens next?
Common thinking: It's over, crypto legislation is completely dead. The Democrats in power will push through many bills, including impeaching the president, investigating Musk, and a series of priority bills and policies favoring Democrats and attacking Republicans.
My thinking: In the next two years, none of the bills or policies proposed by the Democrats will pass. They will all be vetoed by Trump, who will become the veto president and is capable of making that happen. The only crypto bill will ironically be the breakthrough point. Ultimately, this will force Democrats and Republicans to sit down and negotiate.$ETH ⚠️Bilello's Ladder｜The gap in retracement is shocking, same peak day, different fates
$BTC $ETH $DOGE
Overview of the drop ladder
BTC dropped 39% from the peak
ETH dropped 55%
Dogecoin dropped 90%
S&P only dropped 3%
Key coincidence
The peaks of BTC and the S&P were both on October 6
Exactly one year apart
Harsh math of recovery
A 39% drop requires a 62% rise to return to the previous high
Looking back since 2013
There have been five instances of equally deep retracements
Recovery periods were:
189 days, 209 days, 2.3 years, 3.0 years, 3.2 years
Current situation this round
392 days have passed so far
The lowest point was fixed at 58,554 in June
Coming down from the peak is the same
Some only had slight pullbacks, some were halved twice over
The time cost to recover varies drastically
Do you think this time will break the record for recovery period?
Data review only, not investment advice
#USMidtermElectionsComing, which results are worth watching? I find this very interesting and worth everyone pondering!
When the BTC theft incident hit hard, it surprisingly didn’t break through 76,000 directly!!!
Instead, it rebounded around 76,500, which is quite intriguing!
You say it’s weak, but it didn’t break the defense line.
You say it’s strong, but the buying pressure isn’t thick enough.
Short-term panic sellers have already dumped some, now it depends on whether funds are willing to come back in.
More importantly, the long positions in contracts exceed the shorts, and the funding rate remained positive during the downtrend. What does this indicate?
It means not many dare to short; instead, some are buying spot and contracts after the drop.
But don’t get carried away, this isn’t "stable" yet.
This is a tug-of-war between bulls and bears under the 77,000 table.
Now just focus on one thing: whether 76,000 can hold or will be broken through.
If it doesn’t hold, everything said before is useless.
If it holds, it’s really possible to test 79,100-80,000 this week.
⚠️ Market review is just a sharing of thoughts, not investment advice. The crypto market is highly volatile, so please strictly control your risks! #With the US midterm elections approaching, which results are worth watching? $BTC is currently weak and volatile, with a rebound that lacks strength. The price is fluctuating between $77,000 and $78,000, having dropped from $81,900 earlier. The highs are getting lower, the lowest touched 76,641, and now it looks more like a pause after a drop rather than a reversal. The resistance is between $77,300 and $78,000; only a volume-backed recovery above 78,600 would be a clear improvement. The support for bottoming is between $76,000 and $77,000, with a deeper daily view at $73,200–$74,000.
Spot ETFs are bleeding money, with a net outflow of about $505 million over 5 days; however, contract longs are still crowded, with a long-short ratio around 65 to 35, and funding rates remain high.
Tonight’s midterm elections should not be simply understood as "Democrats win = BTC crashes." The Democrats have a high probability of retaking the House, while the Senate depends on swing states. A blue wave would suppress risk appetite and slow crypto legislation but is not a direct death sentence for BTC. According to Bloomberg surveys, the "blue wave" corresponds to a BTC expected range of $60,000–$78,000.
If the Democrats perform better than expected, BTC might drop again to $76,000–$77,000 or even briefly dip below; if Republicans hold the Senate, short covering could push BTC to $77,800–$78,000. But until 78,600 is reclaimed with volume, it’s considered a corrective rebound within a resistance zone, not a trend reversal. The November 6th nonfarm payrolls report is coming soon, and election narratives will quickly give way to macro data. In short: first watch if BTC can hold above 78,600; if it can’t, no matter how lively tonight gets, it will just be waves within volatility. $SNDK $SKHY $MU If the Democratic Party takes control of both the House and Senate, what impact will it have on the crypto space?
U.S. stocks and tech stocks: Democratic control of both chambers may trigger concerns about AI regulation, causing high-valuation tech stocks to enter a volatile phase, but the presidential veto power makes it difficult for fatal bills to pass.
U.S. bonds: Expectations for large-scale stimulus cool down, long-term bond yields tend to decline, and bond prices remain relatively strong.
U.S. dollar: Theoretically weaker, but the final outcome depends on the Federal Reserve and safe-haven funds, so a sharp drop is not guaranteed.
Gold: Declining real yields on long-term bonds are favorable for gold, but it may not necessarily rise.
Commonality: After the election results are finalized, uncertainty decreases, and U.S. stocks may experience a recovery rally #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ I don't quite understand today's volume for $ARB. It dropped more than 5 points, but the volume is only half of the usual — this isn't a panic sell-off, it's that no one is buying. If someone really wanted to sell off, there would have to be buyers to take the orders for the price to drop. Right now, it looks more like everyone pulled out their chairs, and the few remaining orders are pushing the price down on their own.
A month ago, it was 25% more expensive than now. But if you look three months back, the current price is double what it was then. So for those shouting "back to square one," first check which square one you're talking about.
My take: On Morpho, the USDG lending reached 143 million in less than a month. That story is real, but it doesn't support the market price. When no one is buying, even the best narratives are just pictures hanging on the wall. Below 0.15, I won't try to guess the bottom; if someone really wants to come back in, we'll see the volume return first. $ARB #BTC Key Turning Point｜Midterm Election Countdown🔥
BTC has now dropped back to 76,500, hitting a one-month low, with ETF funds continuously flowing out as capital moves to hedge early.
Historical review: After the previous three midterm elections, BTC formed bear market bottoms, with the bottoming cycle continuously shortening: 71 days → 38 days → 13 days.
Voting on November 3 directly determines the direction of the CLARITY Act, influencing the SEC's regulatory strictness.
Technically, BTC is at the end of wave four correction, bulls are competing as the shoe drops and negative factors clear out, with hopes to start wave five; bears are expected to do a final shakeout near 75,000.
Combined with upcoming Nonfarm Payrolls and CPI data, multiple macro factors resonate.
Avoid heavy positions betting on the outcome early; closely watch congressional control, bill statements, and ETF fund flows!
$BTC $ETH $BTC
Pushing lower and building a bearish narrative throughout the 20–30 days leading into the midterms...
Yeah, very bearish...
The only time we've seen this happen, price rallied 50% to the upside into mid-month.
I don't expect a move of that magnitude this time around, but if the pattern repeats, we should see price push higher into mid November
#AppleQ4MarginPressure $XAU 🛢️ Crude Oil Crash Characterization: Supply Side Recovery, Not Recession ✅
Confirmed reasons for the crash: US-Iran diplomatic thaw, rising hopes for peace talks → War premium squeezed out.
- On 11/2, WTI dropped over 6%, triggered by reports of US-Iran dialogue resumption
- OPEC+ has been increasing production (September +920,000 barrels/day, led by Saudi Arabia), Strait of Hormuz exports have resumed
- Trump also claimed "oil prices are coming down" the day before the midterm elections
Triangular verification confirms: oil price -6.78% but gold +0.87%, silver +1.01% rose against the trend → This is textbook "supply recovery" characteristic, not a recession-driven demand collapse (during recession, gold and silver would both be sold off).
Final directional judgment (for BTC):
🟢 Medium term
• Conclusion: Positive — oil price drop → inflation cooling → rising rate cut expectations → liquidity easing, hitting BTC's soft spot
🔴 Short term
• Conclusion: Still under pressure — gold-silver ratio at 79.3 approaching warning line, silver down 18.9% over 20 days exposing recession concerns, risk aversion not dissipated
In short: the "war tax" on oil prices has retreated, but the "recession tax" remains. Rate cut expectations are the medium-term tailwind, sentiment has not yet turned short term.
Key levels: WTI holding $95 (0.5 Fibonacci) counts as a healthy pullback; break below looks at $91.4. BTC correlation depends on whether it can leverage "rate cut expectations" to reclaim the $80k value zone. The most heartbreaking question these past two days: Are the exchanges about to run away?
The numbers are indeed scary, with a net outflow of $5.276 billion in two days and withdrawals of $10.97 billion. But at the same time, deposits reached $5.695 billion, so half the money just moved places.
More importantly, the BTC balance dropped from 732,000 to 711,000, a decrease of 21,100 BTC, which is less than 3% of the total balance. If they were really running away, would the drop be this small?
Simply put, the channels were clogged for a few days, and everyone who wanted to leave was stuck at the door. Once the door opened, they all rushed out together. On November 3rd at 11 AM, deposits even exceeded withdrawals.
I was among those queued up to withdraw in the middle of the night. $BTC didn’t run away; what ran out was my patience. Don't believe the news hype about US-Iran easing; it's all smoke and mirrors. The market fell back today because the fundamental situation is a high-interest environment combined with unresolved geopolitical premiums. There's no real liquidity in the market, and all risk assets are taking hits.
First, looking at $BZ crude oil, although the Supreme Leader has authorized negotiations and Qatar proposed a three-day plan, and Trump said there's no rush to strike, the core sanctions have not been lifted at all. Navigation through the Strait of Hormuz has not returned to normal. Tanker freight and supply restrictions are firmly supporting oil prices. As long as this broken strait remains blocked, inflation expectations can't be suppressed, and the Fed's high-interest blunt knife will always hang over our heads.
Next, looking at $BTC, it fell back to its original state today, indicating heavy selling pressure above. ETFs are all short-lived money that comes in and out quickly, with no long-term funds supporting the bottom. The expectation of rate cuts has been dashed, and off-exchange funds dare not enter. Holding long-term spot is fine, but don't chase highs in the short term.
Ethereum remains hopeless. Whenever the market trembles, it falls harder than anyone else. The ecosystem has no new narrative and no support. Don't try to bottom-fish just because it has fallen a lot; in a liquidity-drained market, catching a falling knife is suicide.
Gold $XAUT is the hard currency in this chaos. Geopolitical easing is just politicians' empty talk; central bank buying firmly supports the bottom. The more chaotic the macro environment, the stronger gold's resilience. Hold steady long-term and don't mind short-term fluctuations.
In summary, geopolitical games are all talk; the real pain comes from the high-interest blunt knife cutting into flesh. #Iran authorizes government negotiations, can the reopening of Hormuz accelerate? 看一组容易被误读的数字。11 月 1 日 14:00 到 11 月 3 日 12:00，币安充值 56.95 亿美元，提现 109.7 亿美元，净流出 52.76 亿美元。 但三个数摆一起，性质就变了。超过一半的钱只是换了个地方待着，不是离场。真正的转折是：11 月 3 日 11:00 那一小时，充值第一次超过提现。 再看余额，跌得比情绪轻。BTC 从 73.2 万枚降到 71.1 万枚，流出 2.11 万枚，占总余额不足 3%。平台链上储备还有 1397 亿美元，BTC 和 USDT 合计近 60%，BNB 占 18%，ETH 占 6%。 机制不复杂。提现被卡住的那几天，想走的人排成一队；通道一开，队伍一次性通过，数据上就是一根难看的柱子。这是积压需求集中释放，不是持续失血。 我的判断：这是流动性搬家，不是资产消失。$BTC 只掉不到 3%，$BNB、$ETH 的占比结构也没崩，恐慌的定价已经打进去了。 留个问题：储备里近 60% 是 BTC 和 USDT，安全垫跟 $BTC 价格绑在一起。下周该盯的不是净流出转正，而是充值能不能连续站住。The vote passed, but the money printer won't slow down tomorrow.
NEAR governance body House of Stake passed HSP-029, reducing the annual issuance cap from 2.5% to 1.6%.
The allocation ratio remains unchanged: stakers still get 90%, treasury 10%. Daily issuance drops from about 89,500 to about 57,300 tokens after implementation.
It still needs to pass two more steps: approval by the Security Council plus validator upgrades, then about a 90-day grace period, followed by a 24-month gradual reduction per epoch.
Governance voting is just the trigger; the upgrade implementation is the bullet loading. Don't mistake passing for being effective.
#NEAR #Crypto$AAPL Apple earnings released, revenue data looks impressive, but the stock price plunged over 4% directly. Many retail investors don't understand why it dropped so sharply when the earnings report isn't bad.
This is the first earnings report since the new CEO, Tim Cook's successor, took office. Revenue was $114.48 billion, up 12% year-over-year, with earnings per share of $2.10, exceeding expectations. However, part of this revenue was supported by tariff refunds, not by explosive product sales. Breaking it down, iPad and wearable device sales shrank, Greater China revenue missed targets, and iPhone growth relied heavily on the Pro series.
The real killer was the weak guidance for the next quarter, with gross margin forecasted at 45%-46%, a clear decline compared to the current 47.9%. Management also said the core reason is rising memory prices; the hot AI storage market has pushed NAND prices up, and upstream costs continue to squeeze Apple's profits. This pressure is expected to continue into next year. The fourth quarter is usually Apple's peak sales season, but weak guidance for the peak season naturally leads the market to price in future negatives early.
As a core component of the Nasdaq index, Apple's weakness will directly drag down the tech sector in tonight's US stock market. Tech stocks were already hit a few days ago by news of AI capital expenditures, and now $AAPL has released negative news again, further suppressing market risk appetite, which also implicitly pressures the crypto space.
#苹果Q4营收超预期，下季度毛利率指引承压 $BTC 72000 or 85000, systemic risk in the US stock market quietly approaching Market Analysis｜November 3, 2026
The US stock market rebound on Monday failed to continue. $BTC briefly surpassed $78,500 before falling back, then broke the support near $77,500. During the Asia-Pacific midday session, the price returned to the previous low near $76,500. Yesterday, a short position near $79,000 was mentioned; the current price decline matches expectations.
To conclude, the US stock market technically presents the possibility of systemic risk. This does not mean it will definitely happen, but we need to observe the market trend and potential changes first. The pre-market gap-up on Monday did not change the moving average trend structure, followed by a gap fill and a rapid sell-off.
Yesterday, the Nasdaq rose in early trading but ultimately closed down 1.07%. Nvidia also turned from gains to losses. Apple’s after-hours earnings beat expectations, but the stock price reacted mildly.
This recent decline first broke the gradually rising weekend lows. Previously, the price rebounded from around $76,300, with buyers stepping in at higher levels on each pullback.
On the downside, watch around $76,300. If it briefly breaks below but quickly recovers, and spot buying rebounds, there is still a chance for a rebound. On the upside, first watch near $77,500; if it recovers and holds, conditions will be set to test $78,500 again. If the previous low is lost and a pullback cannot recover, the weekly correction will continue downward, gradually testing $72,000, and possibly even the yearly low of $58,000. Leverage retreat! $76,522 defense battle: Who can withstand the pressure test among BTC/ETH/SOL?
Behind $76,522 is a brutal two-way deleveraging game. The whole market liquidated 210 million, with longs accounting for 83%, but BTC longs and shorts are nearly split evenly. Stablecoin supply fell below 300 billion, hitting a 13-month low. Wintermute bluntly states the rebound relies entirely on leverage, lacking spot buying.
$BTC: $76,800 last line of defense
Current price $76,522. $80,000 has turned from support into resistance, lacking ETF buying support. $76,800 (50-week moving average) is the last technical anchor; once broken, the downside space will open.
$ETH: Whale divergence intensifies
Current price $2,244. On-chain signals are contradictory, with whales transferring out $29 million to accumulate, but also large whales selling. $2,250 is the short-term battleground; if broken, look to $2,200.
$SOL: Oversold but lacking fuel
Current price $91.39. Daily RSI is severely oversold, but the rebound lacks "fuel": ETF saw the largest weekly outflow, and a giant whale deposited 1.49 million SOL to exchanges, creating selling pressure.
Although the three coins' declines are small (-0.36% to -0.61%), their underlying structure is fragile, all sustained by leverage. Under event-driven defensive mode, before each holds key support, any rebound should be treated as a repair. The real turning signal is when spot and ETF buying return first.
#苹果Q4营收超预期，下季度毛利率指引承压 Leverage retreat! $76,522 defense battle: Who can withstand the pressure test among BTC/ETH/SOL?
Behind $76,522 is a brutal two-way deleveraging game. The whole market liquidated 210 million, with longs accounting for 83%, but BTC longs and shorts are nearly split evenly. Stablecoin supply fell below 300 billion, hitting a 13-month low. Wintermute bluntly states the rebound relies entirely on leverage, lacking spot buying.
$BTC: $76,800 last line of defense
Current price $76,522. $80,000 has turned from support into resistance, lacking ETF buying support. $76,800 (50-week moving average) is the last technical anchor; once broken, the downside space will open.
$ETH: Whale divergence intensifies
Current price $2,244. On-chain signals are contradictory, with whales transferring out $29 million to accumulate, but also large whales selling. $2,250 is the short-term battleground; if broken, look to $2,200.
$SOL: Oversold but lacking fuel
Current price $91.39. Daily RSI is severely oversold, but the rebound lacks "fuel": ETF saw the largest weekly outflow, and a giant whale deposited 1.49 million SOL to exchanges, creating selling pressure.
Although the three coins' declines are small (-0.36% to -0.61%), their underlying structure is fragile, all sustained by leverage. Under event-driven defensive mode, before each holds key support, any rebound should be treated as a repair. The real turning signal is when spot and ETF buying return first.
#苹果Q4营收超预期，下季度毛利率指引承压 The upgrade is still two days away, but the community is already arguing.
ZEC dropped more than 10% today, back to around $1,130.📉
About $13.6 million was liquidated in the past day, with longs accounting for nearly 90%, and the $1,200 support was also broken.
The trigger wasn’t the upgrade, but internal disputes over funding: major holder Big Z publicly liquidated on October 31, protesting the direction of the funding committee.
The founder proposed stopping new funding, but the committee only agreed to half.
Positions look even worse: on Hyperliquid, tracked shorts are about 193 million, while longs are only 136 million.
I think we should first side with the bears: the upgrade’s positive effects haven’t materialized, and the internal strife has scattered the buying power.
$ZEC Midterm Election Day, three cryptocurrencies are priced by three different ledgers.
$BTC: Around 76,800, down nearly 2%. Above, 1.373 billion short positions at 80,783 liquidated; below, 779 million long positions pressured at 73,731; 7,000 USD in the middle is fuel on both sides. 24-hour liquidations total 281 million, with longs accounting for 74.57%. ETF outflow in a single day is 7,919 BTC, about 614 million USD. The price hasn't collapsed, relying on passive balance from short covering, not active spot buying.
$ETH: Around 2,250, down 1.7%. A giant whale spent 62.97 million USD over 5 hours to buy 27,553 coins at an average price of 2,286, which has already fallen below cost. On the same day, ETF net outflow is about 102 million USD, totaling 336 million over the past 7 days. A certain multi-coin whale's liquidation price is at 2,253, less than 0.2% from the current price. RSI has entered oversold territory; the rebound window overlaps with liquidation risk.
$SOL: Around 92, down 2–3%, down about 23% in 30 days, RSI 26–31 severely oversold. But oversold does not mean bottom: ETF net outflow last week was 71.47 million, the largest single week since launch, with four consecutive weeks of outflows; a certain whale deposited about 1.49 million coins to exchanges over 10 days, about 149 million USD.
Historically, BTC fell for a period after three midterm elections before forming a stage low. All three cryptocurrencies are waiting for the same event.
For record-keeping purposes only, not investment advice.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ Countdown to the US midterm elections! What BTC truly fears may not be a Democratic victory
On November 3, the US midterm elections officially begin. Prediction market data as of November 2 shows an implied probability of about 93.6% for the Democrats controlling the House and about 73.5% for controlling the Senate. But note, this is just market pricing, not the final election result.
For the crypto market, what really matters is the follow-up to the CLARITY Act. The bill failed a procedural vote in the Senate on September 15. Changes in congressional seats may affect committee leadership, agenda setting, and legislative negotiations, but regulatory policies will not change immediately after the election.
In the short term, BTC is more easily influenced by risk appetite, dollar liquidity, and capital flows. Block Scholes data shows that as of October 26, the correlation coefficient between BTC daily returns and changes in the probability of Democrats controlling the Senate is only -0.02, indicating no obvious direct linkage between election expectations and coin price.
My view: Do not simply equate a Democratic win with BTC price decline. Focus on whether actual seats deviate from market expectations and whether support near $76,500 holds. Expectation gaps, capital flows, and price structure are the signals worth tracking next. $BTC #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ 🇺🇸 The U.S. midterm elections are approaching, and the U.S. stock market is about to enter a new phase of competition!
On November 3, 2026, the U.S. midterm elections will officially take place. The market's focus is not only on the seat contest between the Republican and Democratic parties but also on the direction of U.S. policies over the next two years.
📊 Historical pattern: cautious before the election, rebound after?
Historical data shows that before the U.S. midterm elections, the market often faces higher uncertainty and increased volatility; after the election, as policy expectations gradually become clearer, market risk appetite usually recovers. Some historical statistics indicate that the S&P 500 mostly rises in the 12 months following the midterm elections.
🔥 Key focus on three directions:
1️⃣ U.S. stocks: If Congress is divided, policy advancement may be limited, but the market might also see this as a signal of reduced policy changes.
2️⃣ Tech stocks: The AI industry, tech regulation, and fiscal policy remain important variables affecting valuations; election results may change market expectations.
3️⃣ Gold and cryptocurrencies: If political uncertainty boosts risk aversion, gold may benefit; BTC needs to be assessed in combination with the dollar, U.S. Treasury yields, and liquidity, and cannot be simply equated with a safe-haven asset.
🎯 My view:
The midterm elections themselves are not the core factor determining the U.S. stock market trend; what truly impacts the market is how the election results transmit to fiscal policy, trade policy, inflation, and Federal Reserve expectations.
In the short term, focus on volatility and capital competition #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 After liquidation, don't mistake "clearing out" for a "reversal" (｡•́︿•̀｡)
This round is more like "two liquidation massacres, one relatively restrained."
BTC liquidation at 97,993,400, with longs at 66,910,200 and shorts at 31,083,200, longs account for 68.28%; ETH liquidation at 68,778,600, with longs at 38,797,500 and shorts at 29,981,100, longs account for 56.41%, both sides left some room, which is reasonable; SOL liquidation at 25,773,700, with longs at 23,268,200 and shorts at 2,505,500, longs account for 90.28%, shorts only 2,505,500, a long-short disparity of about 9 times, essentially a one-sided hunt (¬_¬).
The three coins combined total 192,545,700, with longs at 128,975,900 and shorts at 63,569,800, longs are 2.03 times the shorts. The structure is very clear: crowded longs, especially extreme for SOL.
But remember: liquidation does not equal reversal. Leverage clearing only washes out crowded positions, it does not mean the price will immediately turn. Rushing to bottom-fish now risks going from "being liquidated" to "actively catching the knife" (￣▽￣)~*. First look at the structure, then talk about direction; don't rush, don't be impatient, don't mistake a rebound for a reversal.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $SNDK $ZEC Why did ZEC drop so hard? Is it just because of the hacker incident? Damn, it's like getting shot while just lying there!
ZEC and XMR both belong to privacy coins. When the news broke that hackers chose privacy coins to launder money, it directly caused concern for the entire privacy sector.
There are worries about a new round of delisting and trading restrictions on exchanges, so traders will flee early to avoid regulatory risks, leading to collective sell-offs.
ZEC itself already has a history of trust issues.
Previously, the Orchard privacy pool vulnerability incident left a deep psychological shadow on ZEC: the market has always worried about the existence of unverifiable counterfeit tokens. Many large holders and well-known traders have already chosen to reduce their positions and exit. Its foundation is relatively fragile, so any slight disturbance is more likely to trigger a dump.
Internal governance uncertainty.
Changes in the project development team and governance continuously make the market doubt its long-term development and maintenance capabilities. Compared to XMR, many funds feel that ZEC carries higher risk and will prioritize abandoning ZEC when bad news comes. #With the US midterm elections approaching, which results are worth watching? Thanks to myself for not closing yesterday $ZEC
The major downtrend pattern remains unchanged; we are currently in a low-level consolidation after a big drop.
Two possibilities:
① Weak continuation: if it can't hold 1120.51, it will continue downward;
② Oversold rebound: stabilizing at a low level, testing the moving average resistance around 1133~1138, but the rebound is most likely a second chance for the bears unless it firmly breaks above MA20 at 1172, which would change the bearish structure.
ZEC is down nearly 10% intraday, with moving averages in a bearish alignment, volume dropped sharply then low volume grinding at the bottom.
Don't rush to catch the falling knife; this is just a temporary pause after exhaustion from the drop. Focus on resistance levels for the rebound first.