Orbit Post Sitemap
【Beginner's Diary | Funding Rate: So Going Long Also Means "Paying Rent"? 😂】
I only understood a term today after looking at CoinDesk data: Funding Rate.
Perpetual contracts have no expiration date. To keep the contract price close to the spot price, longs and shorts periodically pay each other👇
✅ Positive rate: Longs pay shorts (everyone wants to go long, causing a squeeze)
✅ Negative rate: Shorts pay longs
Currently, most coins have a "slightly positive" rate, meaning longs are paying rent to shorts 🏠; while $XMR and $BCH have negative rates, indicating more crowded shorts.
Beginner's insight: Holding leveraged long positions overnight means paying "rent" every few hours, and the landlord is the opposing shorts 🤡 The higher the rate, the more one-sided the market is, increasing the risk of a squeeze.
Do you check the funding rate before opening a contract? Or like me, did you not even know this payment existed before? 👀
Learning check-in, not investment advice
#FundingRate #ContractBeginnerSurged to 80,000, were the short positions brutally liquidated again?
$BTC: Surged to 80,000 then slipped back down
$80,675, 24h up 3.80%, long-short ratio 1.59 (4h ago 1.74), open interest $2.772 billion. In the past 4h, long liquidations of 1.606 million U and short liquidations of 43.782 million U. Started at $78,366 at 22:00, touched $81,200 at 23:00, returned to $80,675 at midnight, just reclaimed 80,000 but hasn't stabilized yet.
$ETH: The strongest gain, shorts hurt the most
$2,441, 24h up 6.26%, long-short ratio 1.35 (4h ago 1.59), open interest $1.626 billion. In the past 4h, long liquidations of 1.89 million U and short liquidations of 18.994 million U. Started at $2,319 at 22:00, surged to $2,451 at 23:00, held $2,440 at midnight, the top gainer among the three coins.
$SOL: Gains keep up, bulls the most crowded
$97.02, 24h up 3.74%, long-short ratio 2.93 (4h ago 3.15), open interest $347 million. In the past 4h, long liquidations of 293,000 U and short liquidations of 3.576 million U. Started at $92.95 at 22:00, touched $98.16 at 23:00, returned to $97 at midnight, briefly touched 98 then came back.
Summary: 70.141 million liquidated in the past 4 hours, shorts accounted for 66.352 million.
After the shorts get hurt, bulls shouldn't rush to count their money.
For market record only, not investment advice
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 In the trading market, there is a very subtle cognitive trap. Unlike heavy positions or holding through losses, which can be recognized at a glance, this trap continuously eats away at account profits: many traders see a bullish candlestick, a volume surge, or a support rebound and immediately conclude that the market is going up. Signals are just clues, not answers. This is the core dividing line between mature traders and ordinary players. Everything the market gives us—candlestick patterns, trading volume, chip distribution, key level breakouts and recoveries, coin correlation strength—is only a signal. The meaning of a signal is: the market shows a tendency or a possibility here, nothing more. It does not guarantee that the market will move in the direction you expect afterward. Here's a very common scenario. The price falls to a previous low, forms a lower shadow, and volume shrinks. Many people see this signal and immediately enter to buy the dip, reasoning that the support held and a reversal is coming. But this signal actually only indicates one thing: at this price level, the bears are temporarily unwilling to continue dumping, and selling pressure is momentarily exhausted. It could be a rebound repair or just a brief pause in a downtrend. If the next candlestick is a large bearish candle breaking the level, the previous lower shadow becomes a bull trap bait. The same candlestick pattern means very different things depending on its position in the trend. A lower shadow during a pullback in a sustained uptrend is a signal of capital absorption; in a long-term downtrend with a continuously falling center of gravity, the same lower shadow pattern is often just a bear consolidation. Looking only at the signal itself while ignoring the broader context is using local clues to infer a global conclusion, which greatly increases the chance of error. Humans are naturally$BTC $ZEC $ETH Based on historical experience, why does it feel like BTC will still drop further? 🤔 Or is this time different, with a pump after the midterm elections? It has already rebounded to 80,000, will it continue to fall?
After three midterm elections, BTC basically dropped first then pumped:
2014: 230 (-36%), bottomed in 71 days, then bull market surged to 20,000+, a rebound of about 8600%.
2018: 3150 (-50%), bottomed in 39 days, 2019 rebound to 13,800, +338%.
2022: 15500 (-21%), bottomed in 13 days, 2024 broke previous high 73,750, +376%.
The pattern has three points: bottoming faster each time (71→39→13 days); the harder the drop, the stronger the rebound; within 12 months after the election, the price is basically higher than on election day.
Looking ahead to 2026, with ETF support and protection funds, a real dip might not fall deep and bottom quickly. If there is another drop after the election, it’s more like a positioning window, not a crash signal. History doesn’t repeat exactly, but the rhythm is indeed somewhat similar.#索尼财报前瞻：游戏与音乐业务表现如何？
G&NS gaming business, full-year revenue guidance is down while operating profit expectations are up. The core logic is shifting from selling hardware to earning from content and ecosystem. The PS5 user base is sufficient, with 125 million monthly active users as the foundation, and hardware losses continue to narrow; risks include new console R&D investment, Bungie integration, and the pace of new releases falling short of expectations.
The music business's streaming base is stable, with offline tours and artist merchandise becoming the second growth curve, but top artist contracts and copyright acquisition amortization increase expenses. Guidance shows slight revenue growth but year-on-year profit decline, a typical case of revenue growth without profit increase.
Both segments have a high proportion of overseas revenue, and the yen exchange rate will significantly impact the financial statements, making it a key variable to watch in the earnings report.Congress has changed.
Senate Democrats hold 52 seats, and US media also predict the House will flip blue.
Those promises Trump made before: strategic Bitcoin reserves, global crypto capital, the CLARITY Act—pushing any of these now requires passing Congress, and none of them can move forward.
All he has left is a veto, able to block others' actions but unable to advance his own.
I can't say how the market will move, but on the legislative front, don't expect anything in the next two years
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Alert! The U.S. midterm elections have shifted, with the Democratic Party sweeping both chambers!!!
This time, the crypto community may need to recalculate after the U.S. midterms.
1. Landscape: Trump (White House), Democrats control both the House and Senate, creating a system of checks and balances.
2. CLARITY Act: The original friendly crypto legislation is unlikely to advance in the short term; Democrats tend to favor stricter regulation.
3. Two regulatory tracks: Congress is unlikely to pass lenient laws, will increase investigations and impose strong constraints; the Trump administration can still provide lenient guidance to the CFTC, but with poor stability.
4. Market impact: The previous expectation of friendly regulation has been dashed, increasing uncertainty around crypto policies, bearish risk appetite.
Personal bearish strategy: Avoid blindly chasing longs; enter between 80000–81000 when signs of stagnation appear; if it breaks below 79000 and confirms weakness, follow the trend to short; take partial profits at 78500 to secure gains, set profit target at 77500; if it breaks above 82000 effectively, stop loss on shorts and exit.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Job vacancies reach 7.5 million, labor market shows no obvious collapse
US September JOLTS data shows about 7.5 million job vacancies, about 5.4 million hires, and about 1.6 million layoffs and dismissals. The numbers indicate the employment market still maintains some resilience, but the pace of corporate hiring has not significantly accelerated.
More notably, the number of voluntary resignations increased to about 3.4 million, with a quit rate of 2.1%. This means some workers are still willing to seek new job opportunities, and not all industries are contracting.
If nonfarm payrolls continue to grow moderately in October, the market may view the economy as cooling but not in recession; if new employment strengthens significantly, interest rate expectations may turn more hawkish again.
I will simultaneously watch $BTC and $ETH trading volumes, the US dollar index, and US Treasury yields. Employment data should be considered together with hiring, layoffs, and wages; a single figure can easily mislead judgment.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% BTC, ETH, STRK, the three major stolen coins, each have completely different positions in terms of their rare value
This national-level APT attack specifically targeted the three types of assets with the most fundamental narratives in the sector, not randomly grabbing air coins. They correspond precisely to the three main lines of digital assets: digital store of value, smart contract base layer, and next-generation post-quantum cryptographic infrastructure.
1. BTC: Digital gold, a scarce value anchor with capped supply
Scarcity core: Total capped supply of 21 million, halving deflation, serving as the liquidity benchmark and institutional allocation target in the entire crypto space.
Its value foundation lies in its capped total supply, strongest consensus, and highest liquidity; its shortcoming is the underlying secp256k1 elliptic curve, which carries a long-term quantum cracking risk. Native upgrades to quantum resistance have very high governance thresholds, conservative consensus, and long transformation cycles.
Positioning: The current digital value reserve asset.
2. ETH: The foundational base for global programmable finance
Scarce value: The settlement mother chain for the entire DeFi, L2, NFT, and asset tokenization ecosystem. The staking burn mechanism brings deflationary elasticity. The vast majority of ZK ecosystems, cross-chain bridges, and stablecoins rely on Ethereum for settlement.
Its shortcoming is also the elliptic curve cryptography system, with a late rollout of post-quantum upgrade plans and complex chain links. All L2s share its cryptographic risk.
Positioning: The current decentralized computing infrastructure.
3. STRK: A scarce technical asset in the post-quantum track (differentiated rarity)
Its scarcity is not in issuance volume but in the rarity of its cryptographic route:
STARK proofs are hash-based, natively resistant to Shor's quantum algorithm; native account abstraction, cryptographic agility, allowing smooth switching to NIST post-quantum signatures; currently advancing an independent L1 aiming to break free from Ethereum's cryptographic dependency, building a full-chain post-quantum security layer to support BTCFi and STRK20 privacy pools.
Shortcomings: Still in blueprint implementation stage, large unlock sell pressure persists, ecosystem size far smaller than BTC and ETH.
Positioning: The next-generation security infrastructure asset for the quantum risk era.
II. Why the fact that these three were stolen together sends a strong signal
1. The hacker did not just steal high-priced coins but simultaneously took the old generation value anchor, the current ecosystem base, and the next-generation security track asset, effectively harvesting the core chips of three generations of digital asset tracks at once;
2. The security weaknesses of the three exposed this time are not due to the underlying chain cryptography being broken but due to centralized exchange custody permission failures.
👉 A key distinction:
BTC and ETH have long-term quantum risks in their underlying cryptography; STRK's highlight is its natively post-quantum-friendly cryptographic route, but it cannot avoid the hacking risks of exchange custody. Quantum resistance solves cryptographic cracking but does not solve CEX hot wallet, social engineering infiltration, or signature hijacking.
3. Market perception will further diverge:
BTC and ETH represent the existing mainstream consensus, STRK represents a hedging alternative route. When national-level forces can easily steal all three from the same platform, it will accelerate capital's consideration of two things:
- Centralized custody, no matter how high-quality the coin, shares a common fatal shortcoming;
- Future asset security must be viewed in two layers: custody security + underlying cryptographic security.
III. Dialectical perspective: "Rare value" does not equal immediate short-term price strength
- BTC and ETH's value is built on decades of consensus, but quantum risk is a long-term looming sword;
- STRK's rarity lies in its technical route scarcity, which is a long-term narrative. To realize value, it must wait for independent L1 deployment, post-quantum closed loop, and ecosystem maturity. The long processes of unlocking, bear markets, and development delays are huge tests.
This theft will cause synchronized short-term sell pressure; in the long term, it will amplify the premium logic of the "underlying cryptographic security" track.#AMDQ3DataCenterUp97%
AMD reported $13.38B Q3 revenue (+45% YoY), with adjusted EPS of $2.09.
Data Center revenue surged 97% to $8.5B, contributing roughly 64% of total revenue.
$17B revenue — around 27% sequential growth.
Management sees at least 80% growth in 2027. But expectations are rising fast, and the market's negative reaction shows strong results aren't always enough.
AMD's AI momentum is real; now execution, margins and market-share gains must justify the premium.
$AMD $xAMD $HYPE bought some HYPE again today, forgot to post and tell the brothers. There was obvious support at the bottom at 83 today.
Now there is obvious resistance at 86-87, affected by the pressure from the upper edge of the downtrend channel, but when it pulled up to 87.5 it quickly fell back. I think it still can't break through the upper resistance line.
It should continue to probe lower, but we can't rule out an emotional rally, though the probability is still low. After all, the positive news has already been priced in, and large holders are about to unlock their staked positions, so this selling pressure is still significant.
The current rally is nothing more than distribution and short-term short squeezes. Now the main focus is whether 85 can hold. If it breaks below 85, the downtrend is likely to continue #DailyOrbit BTC stands above 80,000, what's driving this explosive rally?
BTC surged from 78,273 to 80,425, breaking above 80,000, up 4% intraday; ETH rose 6% to 2,430, SOL at 96.5. There are several forces behind this.
The most direct is the midterm elections landing, with uncertainty gone, selling rumors and buying facts, the pre-election panic reversed into a rebound. Technically, the dip on election day just tested the 50-week moving average before bouncing back, this level is regarded as the bull-bear dividing line.
Another force is the shorts themselves. BTC net positions at -0.058, many are bearish, with 12% of shorts within 5% close to forced liquidation; once the price rallies, shorts have to stop loss and cover, and passive buying pushes the price even higher.
$BTC at 80,425, resistance at 81,430 with 26.4 million, 82,235, support at 79,822 within 0.75%.
$ETH at 2,430, leading the breakout past 2,344 resistance, above are 2,466 and 2,509, below is 2,387.
$SOL at 96.5, resistance at 98.89 and 99.62, 100 is a psychological barrier.
To be fair, the rebound is real, but resistance is also present. Whether it can hold above 80,000 and if there is incremental buying remains to be seen. Both bulls and bears should not rush to conclusions.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 BTC, ETH, STRK, the three major stolen coins, each have completely different positions in terms of their rare value
This national-level APT attack specifically targeted the three types of assets with the most fundamental narratives in the sector, not randomly grabbing air coins. They correspond precisely to the three main lines of digital assets: digital store of value, smart contract base layer, and next-generation post-quantum cryptographic infrastructure.
1. BTC: Digital gold, a scarce value anchor with capped supply
Scarcity core: Total capped supply of 21 million, halving deflation, serving as the liquidity benchmark and institutional allocation target in the entire crypto space.
Its value foundation lies in its capped total supply, strongest consensus, and highest liquidity; its shortcoming is the underlying secp256k1 elliptic curve, which carries a long-term quantum cracking risk. Native upgrades to quantum resistance have very high governance thresholds, conservative consensus, and long transformation cycles.
Positioning: The current digital value reserve asset.
2. ETH: The foundational base for global programmable finance
Scarce value: The settlement mother chain for the entire DeFi, L2, NFT, and asset tokenization ecosystem. The staking burn mechanism brings deflationary elasticity. The vast majority of ZK ecosystems, cross-chain bridges, and stablecoins rely on Ethereum for settlement.
Its shortcoming is also the elliptic curve cryptography system, with a late rollout of post-quantum upgrade plans and complex chain links. All L2s share its cryptographic risk.
Positioning: The current decentralized computing infrastructure.
3. STRK: A scarce technical asset in the post-quantum track (differentiated rarity)
Its scarcity is not in issuance volume but in the rarity of its cryptographic route:
STARK proofs are hash-based, natively resistant to Shor's quantum algorithm; native account abstraction, cryptographic agility, allowing smooth switching to NIST post-quantum signatures; currently advancing an independent L1 aiming to break free from Ethereum's cryptographic dependency, building a full-chain post-quantum security layer to support BTCFi and STRK20 privacy pools.
Shortcomings: Still in blueprint implementation stage, large unlock sell pressure persists, ecosystem size far smaller than BTC and ETH.
Positioning: The next-generation security infrastructure asset for the quantum risk era.
II. Why the fact that these three were stolen together sends a strong signal
1. The hacker did not just steal high-priced coins but simultaneously took the old generation value anchor, the current ecosystem base, and the next-generation security track asset, effectively harvesting the core chips of three generations of digital asset tracks at once;
2. The security weaknesses of the three exposed this time are not due to the underlying chain cryptography being broken but due to centralized exchange custody permission failures.
👉 A key distinction:
BTC and ETH have long-term quantum risks in their underlying cryptography; STRK's highlight is its natively post-quantum-friendly cryptographic route, but it cannot avoid the hacking risks of exchange custody. Quantum resistance solves cryptographic cracking but does not solve CEX hot wallet, social engineering infiltration, or signature hijacking.
3. Market perception will further diverge:
BTC and ETH represent the existing mainstream consensus, STRK represents a hedging alternative route. When national-level forces can easily steal all three from the same platform, it will accelerate capital's consideration of two things:
- Centralized custody, no matter how high-quality the coin, shares a common fatal shortcoming;
- Future asset security must be viewed in two layers: custody security + underlying cryptographic security.
III. Dialectical perspective: "Rare value" does not equal immediate short-term price strength
- BTC and ETH's value is built on decades of consensus, but quantum risk is a long-term looming sword;
- STRK's rarity lies in its technical route scarcity, which is a long-term narrative. To realize value, it must wait for independent L1 deployment, post-quantum closed loop, and ecosystem maturity. The long processes of unlocking, bear markets, and development delays are huge tests.
This theft will cause synchronized short-term sell pressure; in the long term, it will amplify the premium logic of the "underlying cryptographic security" track.The U.S. has approved individual stock perpetual futures for the first time, marking traditional finance's acceptance of crypto trading models.
On November 3, the chairman of the U.S. CFTC announced that individual stock perpetual futures can begin trading on qualified CFTC-registered exchanges for the first time. This means perpetual contracts without expiration dates are expanding from digital assets to the traditional stock market.
The core of perpetual contracts is to keep the contract price linked to the underlying price through funding rates. This increases trading flexibility but also introduces risks such as leverage, liquidation, and price deviation.
I believe the significance of this is not just adding another product, but that traditional markets are starting to seriously study the trading mechanisms of crypto derivatives.
For $BTC and $ETH, future liquidity between traditional asset and digital asset derivatives may further intersect. However, regulatory approval does not mean risks disappear; product rules still need to be carefully understood.
#CFTC首次放行美国个股永续期货 #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% Gold holds the high level brought by safe-haven pricing, while BTCUSDT, with a 100x long position, probes toward 79,000. The risk attributes of these two asset types determine that their acceptance logic for the same liquidity is completely different. Gold's pricing anchor lies in interest rate expectations; it can only reflect the market's demand for certainty and cannot endorse the upside potential of BTC and ETH. This position places the flip-to-profit battle above the 79,000 threshold; only by holding this line firmly is there a chance to continue reaching 80,000. Both rising simultaneously merely indicates that current funds are willing to take on both asset types at the same time and cannot directly determine that funds are rotating across asset classes. Signals that can distinguish correlation from rotation are hidden in subsequent price movements. If gold maintains its original price range and BTC repeatedly fails to break through 79,000, it means that funds willing to take on high-leverage risk have already contracted. BTC breaking through 80,000 while gold prices fall is closer to the state of funds shifting from safe-haven positions to high-volatility tracks. The mere fact of moving in the same direction does not prove that funds are migrating between different assets. Open your position list and check the stop-loss set in advance for this 100x long position; do not take gold's strong performance as a safety cushion for crypto positions. If the price firmly holds 79,000, continue to follow the bullish momentum; if it repeatedly fails to hold this level after multiple attempts, you should let go of the expectation of flipping this position. BTC $Stopped updating for a few days, went out for a walk over the weekend, and took the lost money as tuition fees, resetting my mindset. Today, I sat back in front of the computer to start new trading.
First, let's review the current market situation of Bitcoin. The current quote is 80526. This rebound is indeed stronger than expected, combined with charts at three levels:
1. Daily level (macro): Bottom rebound, but no reversal yet
A few days ago, there was an extremely scary big bearish candle hitting 74,896, but the market did not continue to crash. Instead, it made a very violent "V-shaped" rebound.
Currently, the price has climbed back above the lower Bollinger Band and is approaching the middle Bollinger Band (80,364). The MACD green bars (-54.6) are rapidly shrinking and are close to the zero line. But note, the major moving averages (EMA10/20) are still pressing from above. This is just a retaliatory rebound; the big trend is still bearish. Don't die holding long positions thinking the bull market is back.
2. 4-hour level (mid-term): Volume at bottom, beware of overbought
The momentum from 75,690 upwards is extremely fierce, with a strong bullish candle piercing multiple lines. MACD shows a large golden cross underwater, and the red bars (820.7) are frighteningly long.
However! The 4-hour RSI6 has soared to 80.95! This overbought indicator is an extreme value in the recent consolidation. The price has also broken out above the upper Bollinger Band (79,904). This means the short-term upward momentum is extremely overextended.
3. 15-minute level (micro): Momentum exhaustion, correction imminent
Today also touched onTo be blunt: Bitcoin has risen to over 80,000, but most of the longs are actually "buried alive"
Bitcoin is back at 80,000, is everyone shouting "bull market is back quickly"?
Don’t get excited just yet. Here’s some heart-wrenching data:
In the past 24 hours, the whole network liquidated $464 million. Among that, longs liquidated $269 million, shorts $194 million.
Even more shocking, in a single hour, $97.21 million was liquidated, 98% of which were longs. Binance alone liquidated 13,439 orders in one hour, all leveraged longs chasing the rally.
The price did rise, but longs died even worse than shorts. Why? Because the market moved with a "fake spike then rally" pattern — it dropped near 76,000 to wipe out a batch of chasing longs, then pulled back to 80,000. You guessed the direction right, but lost your position.
Now look at what institutions are doing. BlackRock’s IBIT saw a net outflow of $405 million in a single day, the largest single-day outflow since June. Including last Friday, Bitcoin ETFs withdrew over $1 billion in two days. BlackRock-related addresses also transferred 7,244 BTC and 63,600 ETH (about $700 million) to Coinbase Prime — a channel for redemption and potential selling.
The price is propped up by short covering and leverage, while institutions quietly withdraw behind the scenes. With the Democrats taking both houses, regulatory expectations are shifting, and short-term uncertainty remains high.
To put it bluntly: just because it’s risen to 80,000 doesn’t mean your long position will come out alive. #NebiusQ3AICloudGrowth
— Capacity Becomes Revenue 🔥
$NBIS is the AI neocloud test. Q3 expected Nov 12: revenue ∼$906-937M, +520% YoY, after Q2 $582M +454%.
Why it matters: ARR $3.0B, EBITDA margin 41%, FY guide $3.0-3.4B revenue, ARR exit $7-9B, 675MW connected power.
Watch: capacity turning billable, utilization, margins, and $20-25B capex vs returns.
Lesson: Growth is proven — now ROIC must follow. DYOR 👇
#NebiusQ3AICloudGrowth #NBIS #OKX$xGOOGL/USDT Market Update
$xGOOGL rebounded from an old low of $273.54 before rallying to a powerful peak of $GOOGL 386.69, and trades at $291.36 after a +4.11% daily gain and a -0.73% change over 7 days.
Short-Term: Watch support near $GOOGL 273.54 (24h low). Holding this level can spark a retest of $296.60 (24h high).
All-Time Prediction: In a full bull run, $xGOOGL could target $350.00+. If support fails, it may pull back to $250.00.
Will $xGOOGL break its peak or drop? Comment below! Title: Don't Rush to Chase! HYPE Drops a Sell-Off Bomb, How to Close This High Short?
Brothers, the market trend is pure "jerk" behavior. BTC pulled up to 81,200 then softened, now stuck at 80,400. No volume breakthrough is just a bull trap, hold your hands, don't catch the falling knife.
Focus on my HYPE position. This asset surged to 88.9 then went limp. Why? News bombshell — a16z-related entity has been frantically transferring coins to exchanges within 5 days, a clear sign of an impending dump! Technically, the rebound is weak, now only supported by the SUPERTREND at 84.98.
I decisively took a 20x short at 85.10, currently slightly up 1%. The script is simple: closely watch the 84.98 support, if it breaks, likely to test 84. On defense, stop loss must be moved up to 85.8, never let the meat in your mouth fly away. If the market suddenly crazily pushes HYPE above 86, don't hold, take the small profit and run.
Bad news plus a high surge then pullback, shorting with the trend is solid. Advice for brothers: don't trade blindly in the middle, follow the trend, don't be greedy for the last bite! #BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓 $BTC 📉 Tuesday Market Review｜BTC Weakens, ETH Shows Relative Resilience
Currently, BTC is priced around 77,100.
Looking back at yesterday's daytime rebound, it appears more like a short-term peak for this week; at least some coins have shown such signs, for example ZEC. The overall rebound strength was noticeably below expectations, and the market performance was weak, which is why caution with optimism was emphasized yesterday.
1. ETH Shows Relative Strength
At present, Ethereum may be one of the stronger performers among mainstream coins.
Strong support near 2,150
In extreme cases, a dip just above 2,000 cannot be ruled out
Focus on the strength of the rebound after any pullback
2. BTC Key Support
Bitcoin's current structure is not ideal, and it is quite difficult to quickly reclaim 80,000 in the short term.
Key levels to watch:
75,000: First important defense zone
73,000–74,000: Stronger support band
On the first pullback to the 73,000–75,000 range, watch closely for rebound opportunities, but actual stabilization signals are still needed
3. Trading Strategy Going Forward
Currently, the preference is for the market to first test lower lows, further releasing downward space, then look for rebound opportunities.
From a larger structural perspective, the trend has shown signs of weakening. If one wants to wait for a sustained and strong trend, more attention should be paid to shorting opportunities at this stage.
The previous high around 87,000 also warrants caution for the risk of further expansion in market volatility.#Pratinjau Laporan Keuangan Sony: Bagaimana Performa Bisnis Game dan Musik? #AMDQ3DataCenterUp97% One thing I find interesting about AMD's growth is what it means for competition in the AI chip market.
The more alternatives the industry can have, the more opportunities there are for innovation, better prices, and wider adoption.
AMD doesn't have to dominate the entire market to be a big winner in the AI era.#AMDQ3DataCenterUp97% One thing I find interesting about AMD's growth is what it means for competition in the AI chip market.
The more alternatives the industry can have, the more opportunities for innovation, better prices, and wider adoption.
AMD doesn't have to dominate the entire market to be a big winner in the AI era.#CerebrasQ3AIChipOutlook
— Inference Speed vs Margin Pressure 🔥
$CBRS is the AI inference test. Q3 guide: core revenue $214-216M, core gross margin 38-40%, core operating margin -25% to -23% — growth, but margins trough.
Why it matters: Wafer-Scale Engine = one massive chip, fast inference, cloud +287%. Backlog $25.4B RPO, partners OpenAI, AWS, Oracle.
Watch: capacity delivery, margin recovery, customer concentration.
Lesson: Speed wins attention, margins win durability. DYOR 👇
#AI #OKX#CircleQ3USDCVolumeUp49%
Circle reported $865M Q3 revenue and reserve income (+17% YoY), but $181.8M came from ARC token presales.
Excluding ARC, revenue declined roughly 8%.
Reserve income fell 8% to $658M as yields weakened.
Average USDC circulation grew 8%, but on-chain USDC supply has since dropped 4.9%.
Circle faces a double challenge: lower interest yields and slowing USDC supply. ARC adds growth today, but sustainable revenue depends on USDC adoption and reserve economics
$CRCL $SNDK is trading below the resistance level (1155.8) after the latest rebound.
The price remains below the resistance level (1155.8), with attention on the support level (1016.3).
MACD: The histogram is rising, and the MACD line is below the signal line.
Breaking below the support level (1016.3) favors sellers; reclaiming the resistance level (1155.8) would weaken the bearish outlook.
Do you think it will continue to decline or reclaim the resistance level (1155.8)?
$SNDK
#SNDK $BTC
⚠️ NFA - Manage risk and do your own research. SPCX is oscillating within the range, but MACD is quietly expanding.
$SPCX/USDT - Bearish · Confidence 55% 🔴
Trading plan:
Entry: 136.68 – 137.66
Stop loss: 141.08
Target 1: 134.24
Target 2: 132.28
Target 3: 129.35
Why choose this setup?
- 1D trend: Range-bound.
- 15-minute RSI: 49.9.
Discussion:
Do you think it will break the first target and continue to extend?
$SPCX
#SPCX $BTC
⚠️ For personal market analysis only. Not financial advice - please manage risk and do your own research. Bitcoin breaks through 80,000 USDT! Bullish surge within the day 📈
According to the latest market data from OKX, $BTC has just successfully shattered a key resistance level, soaring to the 80,381.8 USDT mark, recording a strong 24-hour gain of +3.78%!
🔍 Key market details observed:
• Buying power dominates absolutely: In the current real-time buy-sell ratio, buyers (B) hold a high willingness of 59%, while sellers (S) only account for 41%, indicating a highly euphoric bullish sentiment in the market.
• Large bullish orders in place: Near the critical price of 80,381.8, we see concentrated large buy orders of up to 4.11448 $BTC, providing strong support.
Recently, amid the macro geopolitical developments, BTC has withstood previous adjustment pressures and, after short-term liquidation of many shorts, has ushered in this violent rally. The price has now successfully surpassed the 80,000 threshold, fully opening up the upside potential. However, with high volume at elevated levels, short-term volatility may further intensify. Intraday operations should avoid blindly chasing highs; it is more advisable to watch for pullback confirmations around the 80,000 whole number level. #BTCETFFlowParadox $HYPE/USDT Market Update
$HYPE rebounded from an old low of $51.153 before rallying to a powerful peak of $HYPE 98.041, and trades at $85.221 after a +0.07% daily gain and a +5.60% change over 7 days.
Short-Term: Watch support near $HYPE 81.059 (24h low). Holding this level can spark a retest of $88.861 (24h high).
All-Time Prediction: In a full bull run, $HYPE could target $HYPE 100.000+. If support fails, it may pull back to $75.000.
Will $HYPE break its peak or drop? Comment below! The Binance hack incident is a national-level digital financial confrontation and a typical real-world battle in the digital currency war.
First, clarify the boundaries: strictly from the perspective of international law, it does not belong to the traditional sense of a declared currency war; but from the perspective of digital financial games and national strategic goals, this is a financial plundering operation launched by a state-backed APT force, part of the digital currency war.
1. Why it has the characteristics of a national-level currency war
1. The main body is not ordinary cybercrime but a state-supported APT organization
Multiple on-chain intelligence agencies and the FBI attribute the attack to TraderTraitor (Lazarus/APT38), long recognized as a state-supported hacker group. The attack was not random luck but a months-long social engineering ambush: fake recruitment, poisoning, infiltrating internal operations personnel, hijacking signature permissions. The entire operation plan is highly systematic and beyond the capability of civilian hackers.
Its core purpose is not just to get rich but to obtain foreign exchange and support national strategic projects under sanctions and blockades. It is a state-level funding supply operation, completely different from ordinary hackers seeking profit.
2. The attack target precisely locks onto global liquidity hubs
Binance is the largest global hub for crypto assets, influencing the liquidity, market consensus, and global capital confidence of massive assets like BTC, ETH, and STRK.
The impact of hitting this hub includes:
- Directly striking the trust foundation of centralized exchanges, shaking the consensus narrative of the entire crypto industry;
- Amplifying global capital’s fear of the CEX custody model, changing capital allocation preferences;
- Providing strong narrative leverage for U.S. regulators to tighten long-arm regulation, expand sanction lists, and export their digital asset rules.
The attack itself, along with subsequent characterization, attribution, and sanctions, forms a complete game chain.
3. The battlefield is digital finance; the weapons are cryptography, social engineering, and on-chain money laundering
Traditional currency wars rely on interest rate hikes, exchange rates, trade barriers, and financial sanctions; digital currency wars add cyber intrusions, private key hijacking, on-chain mixing, and cryptographic attacks.
This incident perfectly demonstrates that digital assets can become channels to bypass sanctions and transfer massive wealth across borders, while also becoming battlegrounds for great power games. Assets are borderless and transfers irreversible; once seized, recovery is extremely difficult, naturally fitting covert financial confrontations.
2. Objective distinctions from traditional currency wars
1. No open declaration of war; it is a gray-area covert cyber operation
No official acknowledgment or declaration documents exist; it lies in a fuzzy area of international law. Traditional currency wars are sovereign states’ open financial policy confrontations.
2. The primary goal is to seize funds, not directly crush a country’s fiat system
Its first demand is to obtain liquid crypto assets, not to directly suppress the U.S. dollar or destroy a country’s currency credibility; however, the secondary effects will reshape the entire digital asset landscape and regulatory direction.
3. Binance is a commercial platform, not a sovereign official financial institution
The target is a market-driven exchange, not a central bank or sovereign foreign exchange reserve, which is the core difference from classic currency war targets.
3. Connecting your long-term main logic: this event brings sector differentiation
This national-level attack will continuously reinforce two market perceptions:
1. The security of centralized custody (CEX) is extremely fragile against national-level APTs; even leading exchanges cannot withstand long-term targeted infiltration;
2. The value of cryptographic underlying security rises: people begin to distinguish between “custody security” and “on-chain cryptographic security.” The quantum risk of BTC and ETH’s elliptic curve systems and the narrative weight of post-quantum resistant public chains (STRK’s independent L1) continue to rise.
Capital will gradually differentiate: some will flee CEXs toward cold wallets and self-custody; others will seek native post-quantum underlying chains as a hedge layer.
4. Summary
This is not a traditional textbook currency war but a digital financial war action involving national-level forces in the digital currency era.
When state forces can, through APT, quickly plunder billions of digital assets from the world’s largest financial hub, it proves that the crypto sector is no longer just a game between retail and institutions but a new battleground for great power competition.
Going forward, such incidents will not be isolated; digital asset security confrontations and cryptographic arms races will continue long-term.$CL – 1H Signal
Entry: 89.50 – 90.20 (on pullback)
Stop Loss: 91.30
TP1: 88.40
TP2: 87.50
TP3: 86.50
Analysis: Strong bearish momentum. Price is trading below EMA 5, 10 and 20, confirming selling pressure.
Note: Current price is near support at 88.33. Avoid chasing shorts here; wait for a pullback and rejection.
Invalidation: 1H candle close above 91.30.
DYOR. Use low leverage and strict risk management.
@OKX Orbit Daily $BTC short-term data copy
Bitcoin surged nearly 5% in the short term, returning above $80,000
In the early morning of November 5 Beijing time, Bitcoin quickly rallied, reaching a high of about $81,190, with a 24-hour increase of about 4.13%. The price once stood above $80,500. Previously, BTC briefly fell below $76,000 on November 4, triggering a concentrated liquidation in the market, followed by a rapid recovery.
This round of rebound is not driven by a single piece of news but by multiple factors combined:
● Risk assets warming up: U.S. tech stocks strengthened, and capital sentiment spilled over to digital assets.
● Recovery after leverage cleanup: earlier long positions were concentratedly cleared, with short covering and short-term buying jointly pushing up the price.
● Reduced political expectation disturbances: the U.S. midterm election results caused short-term volatility, but the market is finding direction again after digestion.
● Synchronized strength in crypto concept stocks: some U.S. crypto-related stocks rose, creating a resonance in sentiment.
Current market sentiment remains in the fear zone; short-term fluctuations should not be overly interpreted as a trend reversal. Resistance can be watched near $81,000—$81,200 above, with support referenced around $78,000 and $75,700 below. The current market is not simply a bull or bear market; it has entered a more selective phase.
AI needs to prove investment returns, stablecoins need to demonstrate real usage demand, and the crypto market needs to observe whether institutional funds are flowing back in.
Next, I will focus on three directions:
1. The fund flows of BTC spot ETFs and changes in institutional holdings.
2. Whether the revenue growth of AI infrastructure companies can be converted into profits.
3. Federal Reserve policy expectations and U.S. employment data.
The market changes daily, with opportunities and risks constantly shifting.
Don't chase hot topics, don't blindly trust narratives; first look at the data, then make judgments.
— Rooftop Trader $BTC
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓 Strategy is repairing its preferreds, not stacking BTC — $208.2M vs $65.5M tells the story. $BTC has already run past $78,000 to $80,400+, so watch whether the rally holds above $80,500 or fades back to $76,463.DeFi continues to grow, with AAVE lending and UNI trading as the two leading contenders—who can turn on-chain traffic into token value?
Continuously tracking the two core targets in the DeFi sector: AAVE and UNI.
$AAVE: The on-chain lending leader, with V4 deposits surpassing $1.5 billion, and a total historical protocol loan transaction volume reaching $1.1 trillion.
$UNI: The DEX leader, with Aggregator Hooks launched, connecting Ethereum, Base, and other networks, integrating external liquidity.The boot has dropped, but the funds haven't turned back! Don't mistake a V-shape rebound for a reversal
The midterm election results are out, with the Democratic Party taking control of both chambers. The market first went through a "stress test," then quickly saw short-covering. $BTC briefly fell below 76000, $ETH dipped to 2225; but once the results were no longer uncertain, the market immediately shifted from "fear of bad news" to "bad news fully priced in," with BTC V-shaped pulling back to 78468 and ETH recovering to 2300.
Note, the fuel for this rebound is not the election itself! The Democratic victory was already priced in by the market at over 75%, what was really bought back was "certainty." On election day, Bitcoin options block trades exceeded 660 million, with some funds clearly betting on a short-term rebound.
The harsher truth is: price reclaiming key levels does not equal the return of incremental funds.
ETH spot ETFs have seen net outflows for more than 20 consecutive days, with BlackRock withdrawing 138 million in one day; this BTC rally is more about short squeeze liquidations than new buying entering the market.
Analysis by Sister San:
78000 and 2300 are currently just the "psychological stop-loss lines" for bulls and bears, not trend confirmation signals. A typical "buy the rumor, sell the fact" scenario.
The market has temporarily stopped falling, but the real fresh capital hasn't arrived yet. Don't rush to chase the high just because of the V-shape rebound; the overhead trapped positions remain heavy. Control your hands, patiently wait for real improvement in the capital flow, wait for volume confirmation on the right side, then enter. Surviving is better than anything else.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
For personal market observation only, not investment advice.$ETH rising on the 4H chart doesn't automatically mean it's time to go long. Previous rallies have reversed sharply, so caution is key. With election uncertainty ahead, I'd rather wait for a higher entry and look for short opportunities than chase the rally. 📉⚠️
#ETH #Ethereum #Trading #CryptoMarket The crypto market surged overnight, with $BTC reclaiming $80K, $ETH gaining nearly 6%, and PEPE showing strength. $BTC must hold $80K to target $82K, while $ETH needs $2,500 and PEPE $0.0000055 for further upside. Is this a real reversal or just a temporary bounce? Watch volume before chasing! 🚀📊
#BTC #ETH #PEPE #CryptoMarket #Bitcoin In early trading, the Nasdaq index dropped 2%, $BTC briefly fell below $76,000, seemingly heading toward $75,000, and $ETH weakened in sync—the market interpreted the news of the Democratic Party's victory as a sign that the stock market would face significant pressure, as if the script was already written. Unexpectedly, the market suddenly reversed upward, with a rebound that overturned the sentiment of the entire day. This kind of intraday sharp turn is the most important market narrative to watch right now: direction is not determined by news but by position structure. A truly underestimated point is this: when bad news hits but prices refuse to continue falling, it indicates that selling pressure has already been fully absorbed during the panic phase. $BTC's rapid recovery from below $76,000 is essentially a liquidity cleanse, not a continuation of the downtrend. Most people focus on the linear logic of "the Democrats won, so it should fall," but they overlook that the market had long priced in this expectation, leaving only fuel for short covering. This is also why "the bottom looks very clear" only ever makes sense in hindsight—the intraday mental struggle over whether to add positions or stop losses, and the response plan for deeper pullbacks, are what ultimately determine the outcome. Signals at the capital level are equally intriguing: large funds clearly cannot withstand this volatility and dare not add more positions; Solx and Koru in the $SOL ecosystem also took small profits and exited, choosing to lock in gains rather than increase exposure. This is not bearish sentiment but an instinctive contraction by institutions after volatility is priced too high. When smart money chooses to "take a little profit and run," it often means the sustainability of the short-term rebound is questionable, but it also means The U.S. midterm elections have concluded, now attention turns to the direction of crypto regulation.
In this midterm election, the Democratic Party took control of both chambers of Congress. What the market truly cares about is not just the change in seats, but whether crypto regulation will tighten and whether related bills will face more resistance.
Looking at the market, BTC big brother is around $78,187, up 1.11% in 24 hours; ETH, the "slow aristocrat," is about $2,315, up 1.90%; SOL is around $92.70, basically flat. Big brother and ETH have warmed up somewhat, but SOL hasn’t kept pace, so funds haven’t fully flowed back yet.
I think the election result is just a new variable, not a direct buy signal. The key is how regulatory expectations change and whether funds truly enter the market.
Don’t rush to chase news; watch volume for breakouts and watch support for pullbacks!
$BTC $ZEC $SOL
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Circle on the Eve of Reporting: Don’t Just Focus on USDC Quantity, Look at the Interest Ledger First
This Circle financial report superficially examines USDC issuance scale but essentially assesses reserve income. Users exchange dollars for USDC, and Circle then allocates to U.S. Treasury bonds to earn interest; the higher the interest rate, the better; but once rates drop, the interest margin narrows, exposing profit elasticity. The market’s real concern is whether growth can take over after the "high interest dividend" fades.
Two Key Points
First, whether USDC circulation can continue to expand and capture market share from Tether; second, whether non-reserve income such as payments, custody, and on-chain settlement can scale beyond interest. Focusing only on issuance volume risks mistaking a cycle for growth.
What Signal for BTC
Stablecoins are a reservoir for off-exchange funds. Expansion of USDC scale indicates compliant funds are willing to enter, supporting BTC’s underlying buy-side; if data weakens, it means funds are still cautious, and sentiment will take a hit first. $BTC $ETH $ZEC
Market Strategy
Short BTC near 78500/79000, stop loss 500 points, target 1000/1500 points. Keep position size light; volatility is high around earnings, risk on your own.
Ultimately, stablecoins are the water level, BTC is the boat; whether the water level rises is more honest than slogans. #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% Stablecoin card spending hits a new high, but Solana stablecoin supply is not continuously growing
Solana stablecoin-related card spending reached about $141 million in October, but another on-chain statistic shows that Solana stablecoin supply decreased from about $16.34 billion at the beginning of October to about $15.43 billion at the beginning of November.
These two sets of indicators are not contradictory. Spending measures fund usage, while supply measures the stock at a certain point in time; funds can improve turnover efficiency even when supply decreases.
However, I would not directly equate spending growth with a comprehensive expansion of the entire stablecoin ecosystem. It is also necessary to observe new issuance, redemption, active wallets, and the distribution of payment projects.
The payment advantage of the $SOL network requires continuous data validation, and the growth in $USDC usage also depends on real settlement scenarios. Stock and flow must be analyzed separately.
#Solana stablecoin monthly spending hits a new high #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $TRUMP Bearish: Democrats take control of both houses of Congress, TRUMP falls 5.5% to $1.491
With Democrats taking both the Senate and House this time, congressional investigations into the Trump family's crypto business and conflicts of interest will be easier, which is direct pressure on Trump-related tokens.
TRUMP is currently at $1.491, down 5.51% in 24 hours, with OKEx trading volume around $8.9 million, while BTC rose 2.29% in the same period.
WLFI on the same line also dropped 4.65%. Justin Sun is suing World Liberty Financial, applying for about $264,000 in sanctions, citing the project’s failure to disclose UAE shareholder relations.
Political meme coins have no cash flow support; they rely on political hype, and once the hype fades, only selling pressure remains If high-leverage long positions are repeatedly liquidated at the same price level, then what you really need to watch is not the price, but who is more vulnerable on the derivatives ledger. Who exactly is the ETH needle piercing in terms of positions? When I saw that long position of 3,214 ETH, my first reaction was not "so fierce," but rather "this is way too close for comfort." With 25x leverage, opened at $2,284, liquidation price at $2,279, meaning the market only needs to dip five dollars for the position to be wiped out. It was indeed liquidated later, a nominal position of about $7.47 million, with no room to struggle. The cruelest part of this structure is that you don't lose because you guessed the direction wrong, but because you left no breathing room the moment you entered. Looking at the other side: the largest ETH short holds about 6,068 ETH, nominally about $13.76 million, also 25x leverage, average price around $2,274, with an absurdly high liquidation price, and unrealized profits accounting for more than 60% of that account. Putting both sides together, the picture is clear: on one side, longs have compressed their stop losses to the extreme; on the other, shorts have thick unrealized profits and strong resistance to pressure. The market at this position is not trading "how much ETH is worth," but rather whose margin will fail first. My own understanding is that this extreme asymmetry makes the price very "slippery" near the liquidation dense zone. A push downward triggers a chain liquidation of longs, passively amplifying selling pressure; but once the leverage below is fully cleared, short covering can easily pull the rebound fast and sharp. So the bullish path is: after liquidation completes, positions lighten, funding rates$NVDA is trading around $204, down roughly 1% today. The $207 area has become an important level to watch.
The bullish argument needs confirmation:
📍 Hold $200–$204 → recovery attempt remains possible.
📈 Reclaim $210 → momentum could improve.
🎯 $243 → previous 52-week high and a potential upside target.
But a breakdown below $200 would weaken the setup and expose deeper support.
I wouldn't call $243 an algorithmically guaranteed target. Price still has to earn that move.$BTC
JPMorgan Asset Management expects Bitcoin to outperform stocks and gold over the next decade.
The report believes Bitcoin's performance in the next ten years is likely to surpass gold and U.S. stocks.
I think this strengthens the long-term narrative, but there are still short-term divergences; the 1-hour RSI14 is 75.4, the 4-hour EMA20 remains below EMA50, and I will watch the 80,849.9 resistance.
OKX data: BTC 80,549.30 USDT, 24h +3.57%, volume 814.4M USDT.
Do you think this long-term outlook will affect current market sentiment?
Not investment advice. DYOR.
#BTCInstitutionalDemand Last night someone asked me in the comments: "What if the Democrats win?"
My answer was simple: short first, then long, follow the market rhythm.
Unexpectedly, BTC really made a textbook-level deep V reversal today.
The price started to drop from 7:30 AM, falling continuously until 11 AM, hitting a low of $75,738. Around 11:15, the bulls began to counterattack, and the price quickly surged, now back near $78,400.
This round of intense volatility coincided closely with the announcement of the US midterm election results.
The Democrats took control of both houses of Congress, and the market's first reaction was panic selling. Investors worried that US crypto regulations would tighten again, and the progress of the CLARITY Act might face greater resistance.
But the market never just trades news; it trades the difference in expectations.
Once the election results settled, funds began to reassess the situation:
1️⃣ Democratic control of Congress does not mean they can fully dominate US policy.
2️⃣ Trump still holds executive power and the presidential veto, making it more likely that US politics will enter a phase of checks and balances.
3️⃣ The difficulty of advancing crypto-friendly legislation may increase, but aggressive anti-crypto policies are unlikely to be easily implemented.
As the most pessimistic expectations are gradually absorbed by the market and uncertainty begins to fade, combined with BTC's previous oversold condition, bottom-fishing funds entered, shorts covered en masse, ultimately driving a rapid price rebound.
What I said last night about short first then long, today the market has given$LINK is the only one among the eight to close down, with a 90-day amplitude of 95.55% and the price only reaching 38.40%.
▪️ Closed at 11.028 on 11/3, down 0.90%, 30-day −22.76%, 90-day +35.11%.
▪️ Five lines: 7-day 11.303 (+2.49%) / 20-day 11.736 (+6.42%) / 30-day 12.189 (+10.53%) / 90-day 11.768 (+6.71%) / 200-day 10.048 (−8.88%).
▪️ The other seven ranged from +0.69% to +7.45%, only this one closed down.
▪️ 90-day range 8.068 to 15.777, width 95.55%, position 38.40%, second widest amplitude among the eight.
▪️ 20-day range 10.273 to 12.809, width 24.69%, position 29.77%.
▪️ 200-day line is 8.88% below, the other four are 2.49% to 10.53% above.
▪️ Volume ratio 90.02%, highest among the eight; RSI 35.73.
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓 Last night someone asked me in the comments: "What if the Democrats win?"
My answer was simple: short first, then long, follow the market rhythm.
Unexpectedly, BTC really made a textbook-level deep V reversal today.
The price started to drop from 7:30 AM, falling continuously until 11 AM, hitting a low of $75,738. Around 11:15, the bulls began to counterattack, and the price quickly surged, now back near $78,400.
This round of intense volatility coincided closely with the announcement of the US midterm election results.
The Democrats took control of both houses of Congress, and the market's first reaction was panic selling. Investors worried that US crypto regulations would tighten again, and the progress of the CLARITY Act might face greater resistance.
But the market never just trades news; it trades the difference in expectations.
Once the election results settled, funds began to reassess the situation:
1️⃣ Democratic control of Congress does not mean they can fully dominate US policy.
2️⃣ Trump still holds executive power and the presidential veto, making it more likely that US politics will enter a phase of checks and balances.
3️⃣ The difficulty of advancing crypto-friendly legislation may increase, but aggressive anti-crypto policies are unlikely to be easily implemented.
As the most pessimistic expectations are gradually absorbed by the market and uncertainty begins to fade, combined with BTC's previous oversold condition, bottom-fishing funds entered, shorts covered en masse, ultimately driving a rapid price rebound.
What I said last night about short first then long, today the market has given$ADA's 90-day price change is −0.63%, the only one among the eight targets with a negative net change over three months.
▪️ On 11/3, closed at 0.18990, up 0.69%, 30-day −26.88%, 90-day −0.63%.
▪️ Five moving averages: 7-day 0.19376 (+2.03%) / 20-day 0.20842 (+9.76%) / 30-day 0.22126 (+16.52%) / 90-day 0.21659 (+14.06%) / 200-day 0.20862 (+9.86%).
▪️ The other seven have 90-day changes ranging from +7.38% to +137.98%, with only this one below the zero line.
▪️ The 20-day position is 15.31% and the 90-day position is 16.82%, a difference of only 1.51 percentage points.
▪️ The 20-day range is 0.18200 to 0.23360, width 28.35%, position 15.31%.
▪️ Above 23.01%, below 4.34%, ratio 5.30.
▪️ Volume ratio 63.92%; RSI 18.48.
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓