Orbit Post Sitemap
BTC has rebounded to around 80,000, but don’t rush to call it a reversal yet. The real question is: who is buying this rally?
The big players have reached the resistance zone of $78,500–79,500, but the fuel for the rebound seems insufficient. On November 4, ETFs saw a net outflow of about $95 million, while futures open interest increased by 12.1%, reaching 694,728 BTC. During the sell-off, the funding rate once surged to an annualized 17%.
What does this indicate? Leveraged funds are betting on the rebound, but spot funds have not clearly followed. Bitfinex also believes that currently, it is more of a passive acceptance rather than active buying.
Additionally, with the nonfarm payrolls report coming this Friday, the market is still digesting the December rate hike expectations. ETH and ZEC are also unlikely to be completely unaffected.
I’m not afraid of volatility, but I fear mistaking a leveraged rebound for the start of a bull market. Holding above 80,000 still depends on spot, a breakout depends on volume, and a pullback depends on absorption. Don’t rush to chase!
This is a personal market record sharing and does not constitute investment advice.
$BTC $ETH
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 BTC surges sharply, is it a bull comeback or just a temporary rise? In one sentence: short covering, not new money entering!
Price pulled up to 80k, but ETFs have continuous net outflows, stablecoin supply shrinks to nearly a one-year low, and the fear and greed index is still in the "fear" zone. The price is rising, but funds are running away. Whales are accumulating, institutions are withdrawing, leverage has been cleared but funding rates are still positive — the bulls holding on hard haven't admitted defeat, the bottom pattern is unhealthy.
76,000 is the falsification test line, not the starting line. Holding and standing above 82k is needed to talk about opening the 87k space; if it doesn't hold, 73k–74k is the next level.
Next, only focus on three signals: ① funding rate turns negative; ② ETFs switch from continuous outflows to continuous inflows; ③ stablecoin supply stops falling and rebounds. Without these three, this round is just an emotional pulse from election night.
DYOR, NFA. $BTC $ETH $ZEC The market plunged sharply in the early session, with the K-line continuously dropping. The majority quickly voiced bearish sentiment, and many jumped in on the red candles, firmly convinced that a bear market was starting.
The wind begins at the tip of the green apple, and the waves form amid the slight ripples.
In the afternoon, the market tested the key support level but did not break it, confirming a bullish structure. Holding this support means the bulls dominate. Decisively enter and position long. All three BTC target levels were hit, ETH followed suit, and the three-tiered stop-profit bullish trend was fully capitalized on.
Trading is never about gambling on luck but about doing the right thing at critical points. Support stabilization is the signal; as long as the structure holds, holding positions is justified. The market always rewards those who are prepared and favors those who can maintain their rhythm. $BTC $ETH #美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 Anthropic's top short seller is still increasing their bearish position!
$ANTHROPIC
This whale continued to add a $7.62 million short position this afternoon, bringing the total short position to $36.18 million, making it the largest single short address in this sector.
Mainly betting on ANTH contracts before listing, with a small position also shorting ANTH, all opened with 6x isolated leverage, currently floating at a loss of $1.46 million.
Here's the interesting point: the more it falls, the more they short; the more they lose, the more they add—opposite to what we discussed before with Brother Maji's counter strategy.
But remember, a whale adding to shorts doesn't mean an immediate drop. Such high-leverage positions can easily trigger cascading liquidations if the market reverses and rallies, potentially causing a short squeeze at any time in the short term.
On-chain whale positions should only be treated as observation signals; never blindly follow their trades.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 AAPL experienced a slight pullback of 0.37%, landing exactly at the intersection of two competing narratives in the earnings report. The results already realized are the marks left after this path has been completed, much like AMD's data center revenue nearly doubling this cycle, which includes verifiable figures such as revenue and EPS, used solely to answer how the company actually performed during this period. This part of the result is settled and will not be subject to change. The guidance outlines the forward path, with management providing estimates for upcoming periods. The focus for Apple this round is here, with next quarter's gross margin expectations being pushed to a relatively low level. It can provide a clear range but only a general direction; whether this path will reach the anticipated destination is full of uncertainties. What truly moves the market is the gap between expectations and results. There are only four possible combinations here: results exceeding expectations but a pessimistic outlook, or past results falling short but guidance offering ample imagination. When these two signals collide, prices will swing back and forth. Even if the final numbers perfectly match everyone's expectations, it does not mean the market will calm down. If the market has already priced in very high expectations, no additional surprises can sustain further upward momentum. Open your portfolio list, check the stocks tied to earnings narratives, and recalibrate your take-profit and stop-loss levels. Once subsequent earnings guidance significantly deviates from previous market consensus, this set of observation logic will no longer apply. BTC ETHI have a feeling: $BTC might disappoint the bears again.
Binance just went through turmoil, the US midterm elections caused disruption, spot ETF funds keep flowing out, and tech stocks are plunging. Negative news keeps hitting one after another, and BTC keeps getting beaten around 76,000, the market is indeed tough. But from another perspective: after all these negatives pass, what reason does the market have to keep crashing?
Exhausting the negatives doesn’t mean an immediate surge, and 70,000 isn’t a guaranteed bottom. But the most interesting thing about BTC is that every few years someone declares it’s done, yet it lives longer than anyone.
I currently hold 1.7307 $BTC, still some way from my first 3 $BTC target. I keep dollar-cost averaging at 3 AM every day: if it really rises, my account is happy; if it keeps falling, I make money on the sidelines and pick up chips. HODLers never lack patience.
Bold question: after this round of panic, will BTC make an unexpected reversal? Next stop, 70,000 first or 90,000 first? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% #AMD数据中心收入近翻倍，营收及指引均超预期 BTC spot ETF capital outflow combined with a slowdown in corporate treasury accumulation, risk appetite has clearly receded, SPCX is hard to remain unaffected, I tend to expect continued short-term pressure and weak rebounds. The price has fallen from the 142.81 level to 136.48, down 3.6% in 24 hours, shrinking 16.43% from the high in 4 hours, showing a clear downtrend structure; the buy-sell ratio in the top 10 order book levels is only 0.78, with selling pressure dominant, the funding rate of 0.0073% indicates longs are still paying to hold positions, and 438,000 coin-margined positions show no obvious liquidation, the risk of short squeeze has not been fully released. Strategically, a light short position can be tried on a rebound to 138.65, with a stop loss at 141.35 and a target of 130.85; if it pulls back to 129.65 and stabilizes, a short-term long can be taken, with a stop loss at 127.95 and a target of 134.45, single position size not exceeding 20%, exit immediately if broken.
——This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wish you successful trading.——
$SPCX#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓
$SPCX #Circle Q3 revenue exceeds expectations, USDC on-chain transaction volume grows 49% $USDC $BTC $ETH Circle announced its Q3 2026 financial report: total revenue and reserve income reached $865 million, a 17% year-over-year increase, surpassing market expectations; USDC on-chain transaction volume hit $13.9 trillion, a significant 49% year-over-year surge. Breaking it down, growth is not "uniform": 1) Average USDC circulation was $73.3 billion, only an 8% year-over-year increase and slightly down quarter-over-quarter; ending market share about 27%. Transactions are very active, but the growth of idle funds is slowing. 2) Reserve income was $658 million, down 8% year-over-year, mainly due to a drop in reserve yield by about 61 basis points to 3.5%. 3) Other income surged to $207 million, of which about $182 million came from ARC token presale—one-time income supported many highlights. Implications for the crypto market: demand for stablecoin payments and transfers continues to expand, but reserve income is pressured in a declining interest rate environment, making Circle more reliant on payment networks and monetization of new businesses. Currently, BTC is about $80,200, ETH about $2,421; if USDC circulation remains flat, the narrative of stablecoins as an "on-chain dollar reservoir" expansion will be discounted; if on-chain volume continues to grow significantly and converts into payment fees, it will be positive for crypto infrastructure valuations. What do you think of this financial report? Join the discussion in the comments: A optimistic about USDC usage converting into revenue, or B worried about reserve income and one-time token issuance income being unsustainable? $BCH Looking at BCH's trend, I immediately splashed a big gulp of ice water on myself.
【Hardcore Review of this “Midnight Bull Trap”】:
Look at the 1-hour chart in Image 1, from 265.01 it sharply V-shaped rallied, forcibly breaking through the MA20 and MA60 resistance. The MACD bottom golden cross appeared, and the red bars surged up like they were on drugs, looking terrifyingly strong, as if about to skyrocket.
But switching to the data in Image 2, I burst out laughing: the long position account ratio is as high as 75.69%! The long-short ratio reached 3.11!
【Unique Insight: The Dealer’s “Chain Trap”】:
In the middle of the night with extremely poor liquidity, the manipulator uses a small amount of funds to pull out a big bullish candle just to create the illusion of a “bullish rebound.” This 75% retail chasing longs are the ultimate suckers the dealer plans to harvest next. The current negative funding rate indicates shorts are stubbornly topping out. The dealer will very likely first push the price up to liquidate high-leverage shorts, then reverse to smash the market, wiping out this 75% long crowd all at once.
【Macro Logic】:
The election just concluded, BTC and ETH are still repeatedly testing heavy resistance zones above, and off-exchange funds have not entered the market at all. BCH, as an established coin lacking independent narrative, often experiences sudden night spikes caused by independent manipulators running localized “pig butchering” schemes.
【My Advice】:
Use the coldest macro perspective to watch the deadliest deep V.
1. Never chase longs at market price: rushing in now means becoming a cushion for that 75% camp. MACD is severely overbought at a high level and could cross down at any time.
2. Beware of bear traps: although the bulls are crowded #Прогноз financial report of Sony: what are the results in gaming and music sectors? Sony (SONY) before the report at the end of 2026: shifting focus in gaming from hardware (decline of PS5) to high-margin software and services maintains margin at a high level, and streaming drives growth in the music sector. The asset trades as a balanced media giant: slowing overall revenue growth is offset by high operational efficiency. This morning, many in the circle joked that Brother Ba Bai was once again precisely "baited" by the dog whales. In the past few hours, BTC plunged continuously, shaking out many who chased the highs and causing their mentality to collapse, then quickly reversed out of a deep V. I wonder if any brothers successfully bottom-fished near the 75,000 low. I just received a warning email about BTC breaking below 76,000, and shortly after, a rebound alert at 78,000 popped up. This kind of wick shakeout market makes buying the dip very cost-effective.
This shakeout script was very clear: BTC directly smashed down to a low of $75,734, more than $600 lower than the previous low, triggering a large number of technical stop-loss orders, then violently pulled back to $77,977. The 24-hour rebound exceeded $2,500, forming a classic hammer candlestick with a long lower shadow, a typical false breakout shakeout pattern. In the past 24 hours, over 90,000 people were liquidated in the crypto market, with total liquidations reaching $419 million. Long positions were liquidated first, then shorts, completing a thorough double kill of longs and shorts, basically cleaning out the floating chips below. On the other side, $SOXL also quickly rebounded from a deep pit of 65.53 to 74.17. Large funds directly entered to bottom-fish, and with triple leverage, the rebound strength was quite fierce, showing very obvious signs of capital scrambling.
Now, the US midterm elections are in the vote-counting stage. The market has formed a clear and unanimous expectation betting on the Democrats sweeping both the House and Senate. Subsequent policies will lean towards liquidity easing, which is a direct positive catalyst for technology, semiconductors, and the crypto sector. The increased tolerance for inflation will also further open up valuation space for growth stocks $ZEC rebound not over yet? Is there still a chance to see the 1400 level again?
Today's market is indeed quite interesting. The overall market isn't particularly strong, but ZEC has followed its own rhythm, rising nearly 17.8% in a short time. Friends who previously set up short positions are probably feeling the pressure now!
I tend to believe that this rise is not just simply following the market but is driven by its own news and expectations.
What’s especially worth noting is the upcoming Democrats sweep Congress, crypto legislation is dead, but crypto is not dead. Senate Democrats hold 52 seats, flipping six red states. Warren will lead the Senate Banking Committee, Waters will lead the House Financial Services Committee. 1. The CLARITY Act is entering its death countdown. The procedural vote on September 15 was 49-50, 11 votes short. Now it can't even get scheduled. TD Cowen's judgment: it won't pass within two years. 2. Subpoena power changes hands, this is the easiest to overlook. Waters' committee now has subpoena power and can investigate Trump's family's crypto projects and CZ's pardon. Negative headlines will continue for the next two years, specifically targeting "politically connected coins." But three things remain unchanged: · Spot ETFs cannot be withdrawn. · Regulatory rules continue. SEC's crypto asset rules and CFTC's exchange framework are within existing institutional authority and do not require Congress approval. · Legislation is frozen for two years, but the industry will not freeze for two years. The market has long priced in this news: Bloomberg surveyed 301 traders, and under a Democratic sweep scenario, the year-end BTC median is $76,450. It is now $77,345. The price is standing at this valuation and will not have a second shock. So don't use the election as a reason to open positions. The real things to watch are these three: 11/6 October Nonfarm Payrolls 11/11 MSCI decision on whether to exclude MSTR and other Bitcoin reserve companies 12/9 Federal Reserve decision #توقعات تقرير أرباح سوني: كيف أداء قطاع الألعاب والموسيقى؟ Nikkei 225 surges to a three-month high, driven by the resonance of four forces.
The yen is weak, Toyota and Sony convert overseas dollar profits back to yen, making their financial statements look better and performance easier to exceed expectations.
Exchange reforms are serious, forcing low-valuation companies to buy back shares and increase dividends, attracting global value funds.
AI and semiconductors are hotspots; Japan's equipment and materials chain is indispensable, and SoftBank is also making big bets on AI.
The central bank is raising rates slowly, liquidity remains loose, and foreign capital continues to buy the five major trading companies.
Whether the stock market's excitement can spread to crypto is worth watching. $BTC#PalantirQ3 revenue grew 96%, but the stock price fell instead of rising
Palantir delivered a perfect report card, yet the stock price dropped for two consecutive days. To translate: the earnings won, but the stock price lost.
Here's what I saw: Q3 revenue was $2.313 billion, up 96% year-over-year, while the expectation was only $2.18 billion; adjusted EPS was $0.44, expected $0.41; U.S. commercial revenue was $984 million, up 148%, surpassing government business revenue of $953 million for the first time in history; the full-year guidance was also raised to $8.53 billion. So what happened? Before the earnings, the stock closed at $178.34, dropped to $175.40 on the first day, and then fell near $170 during the second day’s trading, a decline of over 3% in two days. Investment banks are not worried though; Citibank raised the target price from $250 to $265, Cantor from $156 to $207.
My view: This is not a problem with performance, but the valuation is too high. With a price-to-earnings ratio of 122, good news has long been priced into the stock. No matter how good the earnings are, the valuation needs to come down first to catch a breath.
What I will do: Not chase it, wait for the valuation to reach a comfortable level before considering. The invalidation conditions are simple: if the Q4 guidance is not met, or if commercial growth slows down, then this logic breaks.
Earnings beat expectations but the stock price still fell, would you buy the dip or keep waiting?  $ETH $BTC $SOL
#Palantir #PLTRearnings #USstocks#索尼财报前瞻：游戏与音乐业务表现如何？ Q1 FY26: Revenue ¥937.1 billion, Operating Profit ¥202 billion (YoY +37%)
- Revenue nearly flat, profit significantly up, driven by: favorable exchange rates, tariff refunds; offsetting PS5 hardware shipment decline, weaker third-party software, next-gen console R&D investment, studio restructuring costs
- Existing base: PS5 cumulative sales >93 million units, platform monthly active accounts 125 million, user engagement stable; PS+ price increase, subscription service is a stable cash flow source
- Full-year upward revised guidance: Revenue ¥4.54 trillion, Operating Profit ¥660 billion
- Highlights: Profit target raised very clearly, core reasons are no longer large Bungie impairments, prioritizing first-party blockbusters + subscription services that boost gross margin; hardware no longer focused on volume, prioritizing hardware profit margin
- Risks: First-party new release schedule, Bungie’s subsequent monetization, next-gen console investment continuing to consume profits; console hardware constrained by memory costs, no volume expansion expected #US Midterm Elections: Democrats Win Control of Both Houses of Congress
The Democrats have taken the majority in both houses of Congress. The White House remains with Trump, but starting January next year, Democrats will control who sets the agenda and who chairs the committees.
For the crypto community, keep an eye on these matters:
1. Clarity Act. Simply put, it sets rules for crypto: which falls under the SEC and which under the CFTC. The House has passed it, but the Senate didn't even meet the threshold to discuss it in September. Between the election and the new Congress taking office on January 3, the old Congress can still push it. This period is called the lame-duck session. If it doesn't pass then, the bill will expire and the next Congress will start over. Wall Street analysts judge that with Democrats controlling both houses, don't expect Clarity to pass in the next two years.
2. Personnel. The Senate Banking Committee chair is more likely to go to Elizabeth Warren, who is tougher on crypto.
3. Ohio. The industry super PAC Fairshake spent about fifty to sixty million on ads trying to help Republican Jon Husted and block Democrat Sherrod Brown. In the end, Brown won back the seat. Money can buy ads, but not seats.
Don't read "Democrats won" as "crypto is doomed." The presidential veto power is still in the White House, and radical anti-crypto laws won't pass easily. What to watch next: whether Clarity gets a last push during the lame-duck session, and who will be named chair of the banking-related committees.Many people analyze Bitcoin by habitually opening the K-line chart, first looking at price rises and falls, then searching for support and resistance.
But the factors that truly influence market direction go far beyond the K-line.
I believe observing BTC requires paying attention to at least four dimensions:
1. Price Structure
Are the daily and 4-hour trends consistent? Are there effective breakouts at key levels?
2. Trading Volume
Is the rise accompanied by volume? Is there a significant volume surge during declines?
3. Capital Flow
Changes in spot ETF funds, inflows and outflows on exchanges, and overall market liquidity.
4. Macro Environment
Federal Reserve interest rate policies, the US dollar index, US Treasury yields, and global risk appetite.
A single indicator alone rarely determines market direction.
Only by combining price, volume, capital, and the macro environment can a more complete analytical framework be established.
Watching the market is not just about watching the price.
It’s more about understanding the capital and logic behind the price.
When you analyze BTC, which indicator do you focus on the most?
#比特币 #BTC行情 #加密市场 #宏观经济#AAOI高速光模块放量，Q3财报能否超预期？
The source of any outperformance is most likely not in the 800G itself (which is already fully priced in), but rather in two marginal variables: ① Whether the actual shipment volume of 1.6T at the end of Q3 is faster than the conservative wording of "initial shipment," and whether management's guidance for the 1.6T pace in Q4 is stronger than expected; ② The profit margin contribution from CATV, with guidance of $100 million–$110 million. If the actual figure is at the high end and the margin is better than expected, it can partially offset the drag on total profit caused by the decline in 100G.
Conversely, the biggest downside risk is the simultaneous realization of the 100G decline and 800G capacity constraints: revenue barely hitting the lower half of guidance while expansion costs remain rigid, further compressing profits. The market is especially sensitive to "delays"—after the last earnings report, the stock price once retreated by 46%, indicating that the pricing leaves little room for execution risk tolerance.#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
US Midterm Elections: Democrats Take Control of Both Houses of Congress
US Stock Market Midday Commentary (November 5, 2026): Democrats Won, but AI Hardware Got Hit by Its Own People?
The market is very divided.
Microsoft, Amazon, and Google are all rallying intraday; Amazon surged over 7% at one point, Microsoft over 5%.
On the other hand, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropped more than 3.8% intraday, with Nvidia, TSMC, and Broadcom generally down over 2%, and Lumentum crashed 11% at one point. The index looks okay overall, but the AI hardware chain has very few gains from top to bottom.
This is related to the midterm elections, but don’t put all the blame on the Democrats.
The Democrats swept both houses, Texas and Ohio governors flipped blue, and expectations for tighter data center approvals and AI regulation are real. It’s normal for the hardware side to take the first hit.
But what’s really moving funds from hardware to software is another factor: the biggest gainers—Amazon, Microsoft, and Google—are precisely the three that have spent the most on computing power in recent years.
Those spending money have stock prices up 7%, while those receiving money have stock prices down 4%. The market is repricing "who bears the risk."
Those buying hardware are betting that capacity will never be enough; those buying cloud and software are betting "I’m already collecting rent." The Democrats just gave funds an excuse to pull out of the crowded hardware trade first.
This is an internal "hard-to-soft" shift within AI, not the end of the AI narrative. Wait for the hardware side to clear chips and for regulatory expectations to be fully priced in before looking for a rebound; don’t chase the software side at the peak, wait for a pullback confirmation.Brothers, this wave's trend is really strong! It surged with volume from around 78,000, forcing shorts to cover, with the highest spike reaching above 80,800. Currently, the price is oscillating high near 80,400 USDT.
Looking at this big bullish candle, many friends who are out of position must be slapping their thighs: "Missed out again!" or rushing to chase longs at the current price.
Stay calm! Don't blindly short.
From the chart perspective, although the 4-hour and 1-hour MACD show a golden cross with volume above the zero line, oscillators like KDJ and STOCHRSI have already shown severe overbought conditions (the 4-hour J line even exceeds 100). This indicates short-term upward momentum is overextended, and technically there is a strong need for a corrective pullback.
Chasing longs directly at 80,400 is very likely to buy at the short-term "ceiling." Once the main force pushes down to shake out positions, high leverage will be wiped out instantly.
Therefore, rather than chasing highs now, it's better to patiently wait for it to "pull back to pick up buyers." Today, I’m sharing a strategy with a very high win rate and risk-reward ratio.
The 79,500-80,000 zone is not only a dense area of the 1-hour WMA5 and WMA10 moving averages but also the defensive line of the 4-hour WMA5. More importantly, this is the first classic retest confirmation after breaking through the 78,000-79,000 consolidation range earlier. When the price returns here, all overbought indicators can perfectly cool down.#Oklo核能供电布局距离商业化还有多远？ It will be about two years until the "first commercial reactor selling electricity"; and at least another 4 to 5 years or even longer before it truly expands and becomes a stable, large-scale power supply solutionThis early morning surge wiped out my ETH short position directly hitting the stop loss at $2370, with a floating loss of -215% ROI, I admit defeat 🙃
$ETH up 6.4% in 24h reaching $2433, $BTC breaking 80,000, 1H RSI at 93 and 92 respectively, this is not a rebound but a short squeeze 📈
With the midterm elections giving Democrats control of both chambers, uncertainty is clearing out, causing this indiscriminate big bullish candle, but ETFs have had net outflows for 5 consecutive days, institutions are exiting while retail is chasing.
According to indicators, 4H is overbought + 1H RSI 93, very likely to retest $2350 within 4 hours. Planning to short ETH at $2440, stop loss at $2480, target $2350; short BTC at $80,500, stop loss at $81,200, target $79,000.
Don't chase longs before tonight's non-farm payrolls, entering at 1H RSI 93 is just carrying the bulls.
$ETH $BTC Do you think this is the start of a bull market or a dead cat bounce? Take your side in the comments 👇#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 BNB/USDT Short Outlook
* Current Price: $BNB 718.80
* 24h Change: +2.91%
* Key Resistance: $BNB 725.78
* Key Support: $678.13
* Prediction: BNB is recovering from the $678.13 low. If it breaks past resistance at $725, look for a push toward $745. Watch the $725 level closely!
#BNB #Crypto #Trading #Web3 Palantir's Q3 revenue grew 96% but the stock price fell, reflecting a similarly cautious atmosphere of “good news hard to realize” mapped onto SKHYNIX. I maintain a short-term bearish oscillation judgment. Although the four-hour level has rebounded over 11% from around 977.7, the one-hour structure has weakened, falling 9.2% from the higher point, with the rebound looking more like a correction rather than a reversal. The funding rate of -0.1954% shows shorts paying fees, with 44,000 positions unchanged, indicating selling pressure is still accumulating; the buy-sell ratio in the top 10 levels is 1.10, with only a slight advantage on the buy side, and a turnover of 397,000 is insufficient to support a breakout. Strategically, a light short position can be tried on a rebound to 1057.3, with a stop loss set at 1091.5 and a target at 985.6; if volume increases and it stabilizes above 1098.3, then reverse to long, with a stop loss at 1078.4 and a target near 1145. Single trade positions should be controlled within 5%, and exit immediately if broken.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you smooth trading. —
$SKHYNIX #Circle Q3 revenue exceeds expectations, USDC on-chain transaction volume grows 49%
#Palantir Q3 revenue grows 96%, stock price falls instead of rising
$SKHYNIX I got liquidated, I was bearish, and then it went crazy up.
I just stared at that zero line in my account for five minutes, smoked half a cigarette, couldn't bring myself to stub it out.
Was my bearish reasoning wrong? The Democrats swept, regulatory tightening was a clear signal; ETFs had $1.157 billion withdrawn over three consecutive days, BlackRock alone pulled out $734 million. Logically, this market should have crashed down.
But the market tonight didn’t follow my logic at all. It only told one thing: whose short positions would break first.
In the past 24 hours, $595 million in shorts were liquidated, with Bitcoin shorts accounting for $268 million. Nearly $930 million in leveraged positions were forcibly closed, and the price was forcibly pushed up by these stop-loss orders. My bearish logic was completely correct, but my stop loss was placed right in the middle of that fuel pile.
This is the most frustrating part: you get the direction right, but the market first clears you out, then moves in your predicted direction—only by then you’re already off the ride.
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 When the low point of 1121.6 was smashed out, those who bet on the upgrade news and entered the market were completely stunned😮. This retracement directly broke through the $1200 to $1300 support range, with a 24-hour drop reaching 10%, and the trading volume multiplier stuck at 0.03. During the rebound, there was simply no capital willing to take over. The one-hour and four-hour market rhythms weakened simultaneously, signaling only that the short-term market is soft, but it cannot directly negate the intrinsic value of NU7's protocol upgrade this time. The upgrade is scheduled to go live on November 5, reducing block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, and increasing Orchard throughput from 2.9 transactions per second to 6.6 transactions per second, making it arguably the most substantial underlying update for ZEC in recent years. The protocol upgrade only completes the underlying infrastructure; it does not generate new buying demand, which is the most conflicted aspect currently. Grayscale ZCSH continues to see outflows, with a weekly outflow scale of $93.56 million, shrinking the product size from nearly $980 million to $751 million. The chip divergence is wide: a position close to $14 million is betting on the upgrade's realization, early chips exited at $1514, cashing in $27 million in profits, and community funding disputes have also driven large holders to choose to liquidate and exit. Open your position list, find the order tied to this upgrade expectation, carefully check the stop-loss point, and consider the maximum loss this position can bear. $Bage called for a bottom-fishing opportunity in SanDisk, only to be slapped in the face by a sharp drop shortly after
In the financial live broadcast room, Bage shared his market view, pointing out that the storage sector was entering a bottom-fishing window and expressed optimism about SanDisk's recovery rally. Many viewers in the live room were tempted by the analysis and prepared to enter the market, hoping for a reversal in the storage cycle and anticipating a rebound in SanDisk's stock price.
However, the market did not follow expectations. News came that Kioxia's next quarter profit guidance fell short of expectations, the price increase of upstream flash memory chips slowed down, and the storage sector's prosperity expectations quickly cooled. Kioxia plunged sharply first, and due to industry chain linkage, SanDisk was also sold off by funds, causing its stock price to continue to decline.
One moment they were talking about the bottom-fishing logic, and the next moment the target stock plunged sharply, creating a vivid slap-in-the-face scene. The atmosphere in the live room quickly reversed; the originally bullish comments decreased, and many viewers lamented the harshness of cyclical stocks.
Here, the core logic must be distinguished: storage is a strong cyclical industry, and relying solely on subjective judgment to catch the bottom is easy to fall into traps. Kioxia, as an upstream wafer manufacturer, its performance guidance is a leading signal for the entire industry chain. Bage's judgment was just a personal market speculation and not guaranteed to be realized. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $SNDK $SOXL strong downtrend + oversold ≠ bottom fishing.
Tonight the market is rising, but semiconductors are getting hit: SanDisk down -8% intraday, SOXL -11%. Let's analyze these two with two indicators.
【First, look at moving averages to determine direction】
SanDisk current price 1,032, daily MA20 at 1,356, deviation -24%, even breaking the annual moving average tonight. SOXL current price 64, MA20 at 104, deviation -38%, no moving averages left underfoot. Both show textbook-level bearish alignment, my discipline in four words: no long positions allowed.
【Second, look at RSI to find entry points】
SanDisk RSI(12) 26.8, SOXL 29.0, both deeply oversold. Many get itchy to bottom fish when seeing oversold. But look at trend strength: ADX 46 and 53, indicating a strong trend market. In a strong trend, oversold conditions can dull — after oversold, it can get even more oversold. RSI is a tool to find entry points within a trend, not a signal to catch falling knives.
【Why the drop】
Not a mistaken sell-off, but a re-pricing: Democrats took both chambers, tightening expectations for data center regulation, AI infrastructure chain being precisely sold off; after Kioxia's guidance shock, NAND contract price increase dropped from 70% to 25%, storage cycle logic being re-evaluated.
【What to wait for】
If you want to bottom fish, wait for at least one of two signals: price recovers above MA20, or a panic break below a key level followed by a volume-backed recovery. Now? Grab a small stool and watch the show.
Do you have positions in the storage chain? Did you dodge this wave? This is a "short squeeze + US stock risk-on" composite market. Shorts are crushed, but new longs have not yet entered. The pattern of this market is — the first wave is the strongest, the second wave requires real money. Key point: OI (Open Interest) keeps decreasing while the price keeps rising, indicating the rally relies on short covering, not buying pressure. After shorts cover, it depends on whether new money takes over. 2. Three possible moves after the surge (next 12-24 hours) A. High-level sideways digestion (healthiest) 45% hold 80,250-80,400 80,000-81,200 oscillation, waiting for daily close B. Second surge 30% 4H breaks above 81,350 with volume rebound 81,970 → 82,000-82,650 C. Pullback confirmation 25% breaks below 80,200 79,700 → 78,700 (still healthy if not below 78,000) Note: Volume has decreased in three stages (1,530 → 1,494 → 500 → 419). Price hasn't dropped, but buying pressure is fading — this is the most typical high-level turnover characteristic after a surge. 3. Trading strategy (two identities) 🅰️ $BTC If you already have long positions (floating profit) Action triggers execution Move stop loss up immediately to stop all losses at 79,650 (below pullback low) First partial sell 1/3 at 81,150-81,250 Second partial sell 1/3 at 81,900-82,000 Keep 1/3 until daily close > SOL is still in the spotlight of the public chain narrative, but ZEC has already started grabbing the microphone.
I stand on the side of "real rotation." It's not because the privacy coin story sounds better, but because the OKX spot trading volume has shown a glaring contrast:
ZEC, about 102 million USDT in 24 hours.
SOL, about 99 million USDT in 24 hours.
The gap is small, but the provocation is significant. When discussing the leading public chains, it's lively, but when it comes to the trading table, ZEC has actually taken the seat ahead of SOL.
More importantly, ZEC rose about +9.0%, SOL rose about +3.6%. With stronger price and higher trading volume, I prefer to see this as a shift in capital attention rather than just riding the hype.
Of course, trading volume is not net inflow, and surpassing SOL doesn't mean taking over the market. But to directly label this signal as a "one-day wonder" is also jumping to conclusions.
In this battle for the spotlight, which explanation do you support?
A Real rotation / B One-day wonder
#Solana稳定币卡月消费额创新高 $ZEC $SOL $133 million USD was funneled directly into exchange accounts through traditional banking channels, and this scheme is wilder than you think.
French cooperative bank Arkéa's online banking platform Fortuneo appears to have been targeted by organized fraud. Scammers used forged identities to pass KYC, opened accounts on exchanges like Kraken, then transferred money from Fortuneo to these accounts under their own names, bypassing recipient verification. Once the funds arrived, they were immediately converted into stablecoins and withdrawn. On-chain tracking shows $63 million USD was swapped through UniswapX into 27,553 ETH, with some further laundered into XMR via Wagyu. Kraken has frozen the related accounts overnight, stating their own system was not compromised.
The $133 million USD is only the visible portion on-chain; the actual amount may be higher, with over $30 million USD already completely moved away. ZachXBT says this laundering method doesn't resemble Lazarus, but the identities remain unidentified.
Honestly, the most surreal part isn't that the crypto space was used as a channel, but that traditional banks' KYC was bypassed en masse with forged identities. Exchanges froze accounts quickly, mainstream coins remain untouched, and $ETH has even been rising these days. But if regulators tighten controls along this line, and exchanges' KYC and withdrawal processes are collectively overhauled, that will be a real headache.
Can this money be recovered? #Security TRUMP/USDT Short Outlook
* Current Price: $TRUMP 1.419
* 24h Change: -10.58%
* Support: $TRUMP 1.406
* Prediction: Bearish pressure continues as price stays below moving averages. A drop below $1.406 could target $1.300.
#TRUMP #Crypto #Trading #Web3 The Democratic Party won both chambers, but do you think it's over?
Senate seats are 54:44, with 2 seats still undecided.
House seats are 222:138, with 75 seats still undecided.
However, don't forget that the significance of legislators and the president is different.
For the presidential election, 270 votes to 268 votes or 370 votes to 168 votes might not make much difference; it's the same president taking office.
But the two chambers' legislators are different. Take the House of Representatives as an example: currently, the results are 222 seats for the Democrats, 138 for the Republicans, and 75 seats undecided. Two extreme scenarios, 297:138 and 222:213, are different because the vote margin between the two parties affects decision-making in the House.
Take the recently discussed "Crypto Clarity Act" as an example. The Democrats are not very supportive of this bill. If the Democrats have 222 seats to the Republicans' 213, then after moderate amendments, the "Crypto Clarity Act" still has a chance to pass in the House. But if it's 297:138, the probability of the "Crypto Clarity Act" passing might be relatively slim.
This is the suspense that still exists in the midterm elections. The Republicans lost both chambers, but the suspense lies in how much they lost by. This is also very important!Third, the gambling mentality brought by having little capital.
The less money you have, the less you want to get rich slowly. Because getting rich slowly feels like "there's no time". So we use small amounts of money to bet on a huge possibility, buying not just coins, but the fantasy of "I finally have a chance to turn my life around." But what the market is best at is pricing this fantasy and then selling it to the next person.
The real problem is not "you can't afford a fraction of a Bitcoin."
The real problem is: you want to solve your lack of assets by buying lottery tickets; you want to skip the process of long-term accumulation with decisions made in minutes.
Cheap coins give you a "sense of quantity," Bitcoin gives you a "sense of asset."
The sense of quantity feels great, the sense of asset is slow.
But the most expensive part of the fantasy of getting rich quick is not losing money, but making you look down on getting rich slowly.
So, don't ask "Can I buy Bitcoin if I have little money?"
First ask yourself: Am I really investing, or am I buying a dream of "I'll suddenly be rich?"
You can't afford Bitcoin.
You just can't afford patience yet. $BTC The topic of collaborative protection of asset security in the crypto industry is heating up. As a veteran public chain asset, BCH's decentralized ledger security consensus is the underlying embodiment of this collaborative protection. I judge that short-term capital sentiment is relatively warm, but the selling pressure above still needs to be digested. The current price is 281, with a slight 1.3% increase in 24 hours. The funding rate of 0.0015% indicates mild payment by the bulls. The coin-margined positions stand at 80,000 with no obvious withdrawal, and the buy-to-sell ratio in the top 10 order book levels is 2.18, showing a thicker buy order depth. Although the 1-hour level has fallen 2.80% to 5.11% above the low, the 4-hour level remains in an upward structure, 5.75% below the high. The short-term pullback looks more like profit-taking turnover rather than a trend reversal. Strategically, one can wait for a pullback near 276.4 to lightly go long, with a stop loss set at 269.8 and a target at 286.3. If there is a volume breakout above the previous high of 285.75, then chase longs up to 291.6, moving the stop loss up to 280.2. Position size should be controlled within 20% and closely monitor whether the position volume can expand synchronously.
— This is only a personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. Wishing you smooth trading. —
$BCH#加密行业协同守护资产安全
#加密行业协同守护资产安全
$BCH "It's not that you can't afford Bitcoin, it's that you can't afford to 'get rich slowly'"
Why do we hold onto perfectly good Bitcoin but always love buying those meme altcoins that cost a dollar or just a few cents for a big handful?
Why do we always think: it's so cheap now, as long as it rises to 1 dollar or 10 dollars, I'll get rich overnight?
Why do we prefer to fantasize about having "a lot of quantity" rather than seriously buying 0.01 or 0.001 real Bitcoin?
Thinking deeper, the problem might not be "not enough money," but three psychological traps.
First, the illusion of cheapness.
Coins costing a few cents, buying thousands or tens of thousands feels like "owning a lot." But assets are about market cap, consensus, liquidity, and value, not quantity. Bitcoin can be divided down to 1 satoshi; buying 0.001 BTC is still buying Bitcoin. It's not that you can't afford it, it's that we mistake "owning a whole coin" for "owning an asset."
Second, the illusion of getting rich quick.
A small coin rising from 0.001 to 0.01 sounds like 10x; for Bitcoin to rise 10x requires an extremely large influx of new funds. So small coins are like lottery tickets: cheap, exciting, with many stories. But we only see "what if it goes up," and don't see "most likely it goes to zero." Survivor bias amplifies every get-rich story and silences every zero story. $BTC $BEAT is not a good entry point right now. It might move up to ride on the momentum of $BTC's situation, which has just triggered a short squeeze, but it could also fall. However, the previous wave already triggered a long squeeze, so it's quite likely that the next move will continue to trigger a short squeeze by the whales.Daily Crypto Talk｜BTC 4H Range Consolidation, Breakout Still Awaiting Volume Confirmation
As of 11-05 00:00 (Beijing Time), Binance Spot BTC/USDT at 80296.01, 24H +0.00%. Daily high and low points are moving lower, 4H range consolidation.
Resistance at 80304.21—80510.46, 81092.89—81299.13; Support at 79117.62—79323.86, 78774.89—78981.13.
【Reference Trading Plan】
Direction: Long; After confirmation, enter limit order at 79320, stop loss at 78100, take profit at 81190 USDT; planned risk-reward ratio 1.53:1 (excluding fees).
Trigger: 1H pullback near 79320 with volume contraction and price stabilization, or close above 80510 followed by a non-breaking pullback. After confirmation, only wait with a limit order at the entry price, do not chase price; invalid if stop loss is hit or no execution within 8 hours from data time.
Attached chart includes full indicator analysis. For technical analysis only, not investment advice.I always thought that once money was on the chain and in your own wallet, not even the highest authority could take it away. Later I realized that's not the case: $USDT is issued by the issuer, and they can freeze an address with a single command.
Tron and Tether even formed a special T3 FCU for this matter, which started in September 2024 and by May this year had frozen $450 million in involved funds. Sounds impressive. But it disbanded in August, citing slow response and lack of coordination.
A three-party partnership to catch bad actors that breaks up in less than a year already says a lot. Don't think the balances on $TRX are too free or too safe.$BTC The daily chart this time shows a long lower shadow after probing down, structurally close to expectations, but the tip is still a bit short of the daily 120 moving average, indicating slightly insufficient depth in the shakeout. More notably, the 15-minute chart has consecutively closed with large bullish candles, clearly strengthening short-term momentum. After the midterm elections enter the vote-counting phase, the market's focus is not on who wins, but on whether the results can be finalized quickly; as long as there are no sudden black swan events, the situation shifts from highly uncertain to relatively certain, which actually acts as a catalyst for the crypto market that prefers high volatility. Therefore, the rally of $BTC is not abrupt. The simultaneous strengthening of the stock market also provides clues for risk appetite recovery, but confirming a turning point depends on the final stages of vote counting, the sustainability of capital, and key moving average retests. At least for now, the market is trading on a "return to certainty" rather than simply betting on party lines.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 The 15-minute chart for PEPE/USDT demonstrates a short-term bullish $PEPE recovery structure trading at $0.0000051965 (+6.81%), holding above local floor support at $$0.0000048625 following a bounce toward peak resistance at $PEPE $0.0000053142.
Price action is testing dynamic moving average resistance with MA5 at $PEPE $0.0000052048, while trading above MA10 at e0wp3e$0.0000050830 and baseline MA20 at $0.0000050456, accompanied by positive MACD momentum at 0.0000000155.
#DemocratsWinCongress After $BTC crossed eighty thousand, I actually want to see a pullback rather than rushing to upgrade the rebound into a bull market.
Kraken quotes about $80,372, with a rolling high around $81,180. The price has moved into a higher zone, but there is still a retracement between the high and the current price; this is neither evidence of a top nor proof that all resistance above has disappeared. I don't want to confuse intraday touches and closing acceptance when the market is hottest.
TraderGauls still regards 82,000 as a resistance reference that needs to be flipped, emphasizing that it cannot be directly considered support before being reclaimed. This is his chart judgment, not my independently recalculated pivot indicator. My personal market observation is that if subsequent closes stand above and the pullback holds, I will adjust to a cautious attitude; if it pushes up then falls back below and the rebound fails again, I will revoke the assumption of a valid breakout and not maintain belief based on farther targets.
My overall judgment is that the expanded rebound has increased attention but has not reduced the trial-and-error cost of chasing prices. I will not temporarily raise risk budgets because I missed the earlier phase, nor treat others' floating profits protection as a safety cushion for new entries. Facing the next resistance, will you first look for a stable close above or volume-price support after a pullback? This is just an exchange of views and does not constitute investment advice.Bitcoin’s next move may be decided less by crypto-native flows than by a single US data point. Friday’s nonfarm payrolls release is forecast at 65,000 jobs, a sharp step up from the prior month’s 29,000. That gap matters: if the print lands at or above the forecast, the market may read it as evidence the labour market is holding up, reinforcing the case for tighter policy expectations and pressuring risk assets. $BTC is therefore exposed to a macro signal that has nothing to do with on-chain act$NEAR Bullish news: The issuance cap is cut from 2.5% to 1.6%, NEAR rises 7.2% in one day
NEAR current price is $4.136, up 7.18% in 24 hours, with a trading volume of $27.1 million, ranging from 3.694 to 4.273
House of Stake governance vote passed a proposal to reduce the annual issuance cap from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 months, with new tokens still allocated 90% to stakers and 10% to the treasury
Lower issuance cap means less new circulating supply released annually, reducing long-term selling pressure outside of staking, which is a direct supply-side positive
This is the second issuance cut; in October 2025 it was just reduced from 5% to 2.5%
Implementation still requires security council review, a 90-day buffer period, and validator upgrades, so it will not take effect immediately in the short term.An alliance dedicated to freezing funds on the TRON chain quietly disbanded in August this year. In May, it was still showcasing its achievements: cumulatively freezing over $450 million in illegal assets.
T3 FCU was established in September 2024 as a tripartite collaboration—TRM Labs, which does on-chain analysis; Tether, the issuer of $USDT; and TRON itself. The mission was very specific: to track and freeze USDT on the TRON chain related to illegal activities, with cooperating law enforcement agencies covering 23 jurisdictions across five continents.
But it lasted less than a year, and the reason for disbanding was bluntly stated: slow response and poor coordination.
Behind these three words lie structural problems. The three parties had different motivations: Tether wanted to protect the credit of $USDT, TRON wanted to protect on-chain activity, and TRM Labs wanted to sell compliance services. When it came to freezing a particular sum, no one was willing to act first—who signs off, who takes responsibility, who bears the risk of counter-litigation? Cross-border cases also had to coordinate with 23 jurisdictions, and by the time approvals came through, the funds had changed hands several times.
So for $TRX, this means short-term loosening but long-term risk deferral. Without this gatekeeper, frictions in large transfers decrease, and ecosystem activity might revive; but conversely, next time law enforcement wants to freeze USDT on TRON, who will cooperate?
What’s worth considering is: if freezing decisions are later made unilaterally by the issuer, on what basis does Tether select cases, and how will it explain this to the community? Could this cost turn into a stricter whitelist, imposed on every holder?Back-end messages are piling up, all asking: US stocks are falling, gold and silver are also plunging, how did safe-haven assets collectively fail? Where did the money go?
To be direct: it's not that there is no safe haven, but the safe haven was intercepted by US Treasury yields. It's not surprising that tech stocks dragged down US stocks due to disappointing earnings; what’s strange is that gold and silver fell simultaneously. The 10-year US Treasury yield is hanging above 5%, making risk-free returns very attractive. Gold yields no interest, so the opportunity cost of holding it is amplified, leading to funds reducing positions first; silver also suffers from industrial demand concerns, falling even more smoothly. The funds haven't disappeared; they are flowing into US Treasuries, money market funds, and short-term cash instruments to secure certain interest first.
What does this mean for BTC?
BTC is the most conflicted: it wants to wear the "digital gold" label, but in trading it is still treated as a high-beta risk asset. When US stocks cut valuations, it follows; when gold falls, it also struggles to stand independently; plus, previous security incidents have not fully restored confidence. Don't insist on calling it a safe haven in the short term.
But the long-term logic is not dead: when high interest rates suppress gold's safe-haven halo, fiscal deficits and US debt supply issues will sooner or later make funds re-examine "non-sovereign assets." It's just that during short-term liquidity withdrawals, the long-term narrative cannot be used as a shield.
$BTC $ZEC $SOL #CircleQ3营收超预期，USDC链上交易量增长49% Don't take "enough of a drop" as a ticket to enter (｡•́︿•̀｡)
BTC current price 75,982, the 76,000 level lost; ETH at 2,256, down 17% this month, technicals still show a "strong sell." $338 million liquidated across the network in 24 hours, with $265 million from long positions—leverage clearing is far from over. The most dangerous move right now is thinking "it's dropped enough" and trying to bottom fish (╥﹏╥).
Three rules:
① Don't catch a falling knife if 76,000 breaks. Next support is the 200-day moving average at 73,207; after the election, risk assets will be repriced, and the first rebound is often not a reversal but an escape window.
② ETH at 2,256 is the midpoint, so don't make reckless moves. The only premise for going long: BTC must show volume and stop falling between 73K–74K, otherwise keep watching.
③ The macro anchor is Friday's nonfarm payrolls. Expected increase of 62,000, with about an 85% chance of a rate hike in December. Data is the real deal, don't stubbornly hold on with emotions (￣▽￣)ゞ.
Conclusion: When itching to act, first ask yourself if you're trading support or gambling on "cheap enough"? Survive first, then talk about opportunities ✧(≖ ◡ ≖✿).
$BTC $ETH
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 $CORE 🚨🚨 Core's technical narrative is somewhat innovative, but the current fundamentals (price, TVL, activity) are very weak, and security incidents have occurred repeatedly. The b14g incident was a vulnerability in a third-party protocol, not a breach of Core's underlying system. If participating in staking, it is recommended to primarily stake natively, strictly control position size, and prioritize waiting until the incident is fully transparent and the user fund distribution plan is implemented before making further decisions.CoinDesk reported on November 4 (5:38 AM EST): BTC briefly dropped to about $75,600 in the early morning, then rebounded to $78,300, rising about 1.3% since midnight. The leader wasn't Bitcoin, but DeFi: the CoinDesk DeFi Select Index rose about 5%, INJ up 6.2%, VVV up about 7% since midnight and about 17% in 24 hours. ETH followed suit, at $2,313 in the morning, up about 2%; NEAR, MORPHO, and GRASS each rose about 6%. On the other hand, the tone shifted abruptly: Trump-related token TRUMP fell 7.1%, WLFI down 5%, and Trump media dropped 6.5% pre-market — as votes flipped, the market first targeted its "own people." The Fear & Greed Index remains at 37 in the fear zone, and the altcoin season index is 51, not frenzied, more like catching a breath after a storm. I think this rebound is less about optimism and more about short covering after "the worst-case scenario didn't happen" — futures volume rose 27%, open interest only up 3%, with hardly any new money entering. We'll verify again tonight: CoinGecko shows BTC at $80,237, up 3.29% in 24 hours, ETH at $2,421, up 5.31%, the rebound continues, but don't rush to call a reversal before ETF outflows stop. Invalidating condition: if BTC falls back below the intraday low of $75,600, consider this "rebound" as if I never mentioned it. Which side are you betting on: is DeFi truly leading this rally, or just a bounce back after being oversold