Orbit Post Sitemap
Google crashed badly. Before yesterday's earnings report was released, the whales who kept adding positions were subsequently liquidated twice, with a total liquidation scale of nearly 10 million USD and a total loss of over 500,000 USD. Continuously adding positions on floating profits made the guy's motorcycle turn back into a bicycle.
At first, I thought this guy had some insider information, but it turns out he was just a gambler betting on the direction.Before looking at Coinbase's financial report, I first verified the Deribit migration date: the perpetual contract trading previously supported by Coinbase International Exchange was migrated to Deribit starting October 1.
This date is important because Q3 ended on September 30.
Therefore, Deribit already had business that could contribute to Q3, but operational effects generated only after the migration completed in October cannot be counted in the previous quarter. Acquisition, business consolidation, and platform migration also need to be understood separately.
I have expectations for this integration. With trading platforms and liquidity more concentrated, if the experience can be improved and customers use more products, there is a long-term opportunity to enhance competitiveness.
But these effects need to be reflected through actual trading and operational data. Completing the technical migration only means a step forward; it does not automatically prove simultaneous improvement in revenue and profit.
For this financial report, I will separate Q3 actual revenue from the company's disclosed October business progress. If management talks about customer activity and product usage after the migration, that will be more helpful in judging Q4.
The market likes to combine a string of good news into one positive, and I understand this excitement. But financial reports have clear cut-off dates. Putting future possible improvements prematurely into a quarter that has already ended can easily lead to overestimation and then disappointment.
#Coinbase整合Deribit，Q3收入能否改善？ Samsung's Q3 earnings report is out, with 3 hardcore signals at the trading level👇
1️⃣ Quarterly performance structure is singular
Out of 107 trillion KRW net profit, the semiconductor division contributed 99% of pure profit
The mobile division suffered a loss of 0.8 trillion KRW. The core business of AI storage and HBM is fully tied to the future revenue and profit development of AI storage and HBM, making sensitivity extremely high.
2️⃣ Positive factors realized
Both revenue and operating Eli Lilly LLY Q3 Earnings Preview: The Game and Concerns Under High GLP-1 Growth
$LLY will release its Q3 earnings report and hold a conference call at 22:00 Beijing time on October 29.
Market consensus expectations: revenue of $22.61 billion, adjusted EPS of $6.26. The core anchor of this earnings report remains the GLP-1 pipeline, which is also the market's pricing focus.
Mounjaro and Zepbound prescription volumes are expected to continue rising, with capacity release driving strong overall revenue growth; however, ongoing US healthcare cost controls continue to suppress individual product prices, combined with increased expenses from capacity expansion, R&D investment, and external acquisitions, profit growth is very likely to lag behind revenue growth, limiting earnings leverage.
Subsequent market scenarios are divided into three:
1. Revenue and dual-drug sales exceed expectations, with an upward revision of full-year guidance → stock price strengthens;
2. Data just meets expectations, likely leading to a positive realization followed by a pullback;
3. Weight loss drug prescription growth falls short of expectations, or guidance is lowered → valuation pressure causes a decline.
Long-term risks come from new competing products from Novo Nordisk and others, and continued price reductions on the payer side. Unlike AI giants with high capital expenditures and cash burn, Eli Lilly is a pharmaceutical growth stock with solid cash flow, better suited for waiting for a pullback before investing.
Key tracking points: sales of the two core drugs, clinical progress of retatrutide, and full-year revenue guidance.
#ModernaQ3财报将揭示疫苗销售趋势 #医药#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 I am the Mid-term Intelligence Brother.
The Federal Reserve maintains the interest rate at 3.75%-4.00%, as expected but not truly positive news. The vote was 10 to 2, with two members supporting a rate hike, indicating increased hawkish divergence. The economic assessment was upgraded to "strong expansion" but inflation concerns remain.
Market reactions are mixed. U.S. stocks rose slightly, the dollar retreated, but the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose to 5.02%. High oil prices increase inflation risks, the Bank of Canada raised rates, and global currencies have not shifted toward easing.
Tonight at 20:30, focus on the U.S. Q3 GDP and September PCE, which is the second round of tests and will trigger the next wave of volatility.
For $BTC and $ETH, the pause in rate hikes has been priced in. If data is hotter, BTC may test 80,000, and ETH could see a larger decline; only if PCE cools down and U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar retreat will the rebound be sustainable.
$ZEC
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 It's almost 7 PM, brothers, have you eaten and drunk enough? The market is dragging without direction, but I just glanced at the data of several popular altcoins. This is not a lack of market activity; it's clearly a massacre orchestrated by the main players. Let me quickly review it for you all.
First, look at $HYPE, current price 85.6, it directly pulled up a big bullish candle. The 4-hour long-short ratio shot up to 2.19, and open interest surged sharply. This shows the main players are aggressively buying with real money, and retail investors are frantically following. Although the position is heavy, the momentum is very strong. Don't lightly try to top pick in this kind of short squeeze market.
Next, look at $NEAR, current price 4.41, it plunged nearly 6%. The most ridiculous thing is the long-short ratio, which was forcibly raised from a bottom of 1.59 to 2.25. This means the more it falls, the more retail investors buy, all crazily bottom fishing! With so many long leverages, the main players won't pump unless they wash out the bottom fish.
Finally, look at $ZEC, current price 1270, it is drifting down 3.3%. The long-short ratio is stuck at an extremely low 0.79, and open interest is still decreasing. Retail investors are crazily shorting at the top; the shorts are extremely crowded. This kind of extreme inverse data means that once the market gains some strength, it will most likely trigger a short squeeze.
Summary: The main players are causing localized moves now. HYPE is violently pumping, NEAR is baiting longs to kill them, and ZEC is brewing a short squeeze. Don't chase the highs or sell the lows now; if you don't understand, just hold your hands.
What are you holding tonight? What do you think about these popular altcoins? Are you bullish or bearish?
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 The evening market feels chilling. After the FOMC announcement, the market didn't celebrate; instead, it just laid flat ahead of the GDP and PCE data releases. BTC barely held around 80,200, ETH directly dropped to 2,310, and SOL was the worst at 100.19, on the verge of breaking below 100. In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidated $259 million, with shorts liquidated at $156 million and longs only $103 million. Those who chased shorts a few days ago have now become fuel, but that doesn't mean the bulls have won; the price hasn't rallied at all.
The ETF side is even stranger. BTC spot ETFs have had net inflows for three consecutive days, with BlackRock's IBIT buying $136 million in one day; institutions are quietly accumulating, but ETH saw net outflows, showing a bias in funds. BTC dominance surged to 60.1%, and altcoin liquidity is being drained.
Data will be released tonight at 20:30. If the data is strong, rate hike expectations will heat up, and BTC may dip to 79,500; if the data is moderate, there might be a chance to test 81,500.
Based on my current positions, the strategy is clear: longs on ETH at 2308 and SOL at 104.31 are holding firm. ETH's bottom line is 2280; if it breaks, cut losses. SOL's critical point is 100; if it closes below 100, reduce positions. BTC is watching the 79,500 support; don't move before the data release. Keep leverage within 5x; tonight, don't bet on direction but on who gives up first after the data is out. Preserving capital is more important than anything. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 🔥No rate hike does not equal a full bull market! Today's performance of the three major coins already shows that capital attitudes toward different assets are diverging.
📊 BTC bounced above 81,000 but then fell below 80,000; short-term support still needs confirmation. ETF inflows are a positive signal, but continuity is more important than single-day data.
⚠️ ETH is currently one to watch patiently; before reclaiming 2400, rashly treating the rebound as a reversal carries significant risk. Institutional capital outflows are worth noting, but price and subsequent flow must also be considered.
🌱 SOL is relatively strong; the Alpenglow upgrade provides an independent catalyst for the market, but "strong narrative" does not mean "price only rises without falling."
🛡️ Don’t chase highs or blindly bottom-fish; wait for signals to appear first. Brothers, if you could only pick one key focus, would you watch BTC’s critical levels, ETH’s 2400, or SOL’s sustained strength? #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #GoogleQ3MixedResults Perpetual contracts are coming to the US. Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the NYSE, is partnering with Trade.xyz to bring perpetual contracts into the regulated US market.
This news hasn't caused much of a stir, but it could be the most important change in the derivatives space in the past two years. Perpetuals are the flagship product of offshore exchanges, with no expiration date, allowing indefinite leveraged positions, supporting the entire contract market's trading volume. They've always operated in a gray area: US retail investors wanting to trade have to go through offshore platforms, keeping funds in unregulated places, and if something goes wrong, they have no recourse. Now, a domestic exchange group is proactively incorporating this product category, effectively giving it a legal status.
The price is that leverage is being put under control. Low leverage, mandatory margin, and clearinghouse endorsement mean that 100x contracts won't appear in this product. In the short term, this will blunt $BTC's intraday spikes. Offshore platforms rely on high leverage to create chain liquidations, but this won't work in a compliant market, so the market-moving spikes wiping out tens of millions will become less frequent.
However, reduced volatility does not mean reduced risk; the risk is shifting from the order book to the system. Clearing is backed by centralized institutions, and under extreme market conditions, issues like shutdowns, margin call failures, and forced liquidation queues—old problems in traditional futures markets—may arise, which the crypto space hasn't encountered before.
$ETH and SOL will be affected later, as their contract liquidity originally depended more on offshore platforms.
When reading this news, don't just focus on the partnership itself; pay attention to who is setting the rules for perpetual contracts.$XAU gold current price is $4023, the whole network is cutting losses, but the whales' trump cards have already been revealed.
Brothers, gold prices fell again today, spot gold intraday decline expanded to 1%, quoted at $4023.82
The screen is full of "gold has peaked" and "bull market is over," the panic can be felt through the screen.
But if you zoom out a bit and see what has happened in the past few months.
Since September, COMEX gold has fallen more than 9%, once breaking below the $4000 integer mark, domestic gold ETFs have shrunk by more than 18 billion yuan in total scale, and gold stock ETFs have fallen more than 24%.
The whole network is shouting "the safe-haven logic has failed," but no one tells you that this round of gold decline is not about "credit," but about "liquidity."
Guotai Fund's analysis puts it bluntly: the transmission chain of this round of gold decline is not the traditional safe-haven logic at all
But rather "oil price surge → inflation rekindling → interest rate hike expectations heating up → real interest rates rising → suppressing non-yielding assets," gold has instead become the "loser" in the energy inflation trade.
Even worse, the AI sector correction triggered localized deleveraging, forcing investors to sell the most liquid gold to replenish margin.
In plain language: it's not that gold is failing, it's that the market is short on cash, so gold is the first to be cut. This is a liquidity shock, not a credit crisis. $ZEC The feeling of this wave of shakeout forcing shorts to cover is very strong.
A huge whale opened a 10x short position at 786, and has been holding a floating loss of $1.49 million so far, stubbornly pushing the liquidation price to 2432. On the other side, retail traders are still desperately shorting on rallies, with the long-short ratio dropping to 0.846, and all retail traders across the network think this level is too high and should be smashed.
But the big players are not giving any chance for a pullback, secretly buying up all the chips that retail traders are handing over by dumping the price. The shorts are paying interest daily and holding on hard; this trend clearly aims to needle and explode this group of shorts all the way up.
#ZEC
$ZEC
👇In the evening, the three major mainstream cryptocurrencies all slipped down together, with declines around 2%. The Federal Reserve did not move, and the market is calculating a rate hike in December. Under this market condition, whether BTC, ETH, and SOL can hold depends on whether there is real money behind them.
$BTC near 80115, money is coming in but the price doesn't rise 💰
Down 1.62% in 24 hours. Spot ETFs have had net inflows for three consecutive days, totaling $424 million, turning October into a net inflow of $111 million. But the 50-day moving average at 81831 is pressing down, and Glassnode says buy orders around 80,000 only have $3.4 million left, with large orders moved to 78000-79000.
$ETH near 2318, ETFs bleeding every day 🩸
Down 2.16% in 24 hours. Ethereum ETFs saw another $21 million outflow on Wednesday, totaling $1.35 billion outflow in October. Glamsterdam says the mainnet launch is in Q4, but the date is not set.
$SOL near 100, tug-of-war at the round number 🪚
Down 2.51% in 24 hours, at 100.1, just 0.1 away from breaking 100. The future asset securities Hong Kong subsidiary just issued tokenized notes on Solana, but institutional note issuance is a different matter from coin price.
BTC is supported by ETF money. Ethereum looks the worst among the three, with $1.35 billion running out in a month, and without a fixed upgrade date, it's hard for anyone to come back. SOL has news but no buying pressure; if 100 cannot be reclaimed, it is the most vulnerable to a spike down. In a volatile downtrend, control your hands and don't chase highly volatile coins. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #Samsung's Q3 profit increased nearly 8 times, full financial report to be released soon 🔥 🔥 7:30 PM TONIGHT 10/29 – US ANNOUNCES GDP AND CORE PCE 🇺🇸$BTC $XAU
📊 Quarterly GDP – initial estimate
• Forecast: 3.2%
• Previous: 2.2%
📊 Monthly core PCE
• Forecast: 0.3%
• Previous: 0.2%
🔎 IMPACT ON CRYPTO
🔴 Core PCE higher than forecast: May reduce expectations for Fed rate cuts, putting pressure on BTC and altcoins.
🟢 Core PCE lower than forecast: May support expectations for policy easing, creating positive sentiment 🔥BTC current price is 80200, bulls and bears are both struggling! 💣 Smart money statistics show 868 bulls and 1278 bears, with a nominal long-short ratio of 28.99%. However, the number of participants and position structure do not directly determine the next price movement.
📉 The average cost for bulls is 85567, with an unrealized loss of about 60.56 million USDT, and a profit ratio of only 13.01%. Bulls who entered at high levels are clearly under pressure.
📊 The average cost for bears is 76927, with a profit ratio of 70.42%, but an unrealized loss of about 104 million USDT. Bears overall still hold a profit advantage but may face profit-taking during a rebound.
🛡️ My strategy is to observe first, not impulsively open positions just because data favors one side. If BTC cannot choose a direction for a long time, frequent trading may lead to repeated stop losses. Remember, cash is also a position. Do you currently favor a rebound, or do you think the downtrend is not over yet? #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 看点在增速不在营收。把云业务增速推到 48%、还超出市场预期一截，说明企业买算力的订单没有往回收，这笔账没结完。 先算钱从哪来：算力是前置开支，折旧往后几年摊，现金流当期就少了。长端美债收益率还在 4.9% 上方，无风险利率这么高，风险资产的折现分母就被顶住——这是这段时间篮子跌、动量却翻正的原因，价格在等利率给出答案。 政治那层不绕：口风上是限制对手、把算力留在本土，钱一部分从出口管制里挤、一部分从补贴里来，结果都一样——资金被吸进数据中心。不装中立，这对加密是短期抽水。 历史上这笔账单有人付过。1840 年代的英国铁路狂热，线路铺得比客流快，股东亏得干净，可铁路网留下来了。算力正在走同一条路：基础设施成，投机者败。 本轮我的方向没变：BTC 报 80,202，止损 79,648、止盈 81,126，盈亏比 1.67 比 1。真正被杀掉的是那些把算力故事直接当成币价故事的人。 很多人可能不认可我说的，但是我整理分析的资料肯定比你多，而且有一套自己的策略。🔥BTC current price 80200, check how the smart money is positioned before placing orders! 📊 2358 traders participated in the statistics, nominal long-short ratio 28.99%, the position battle between longs and shorts is more worth attention than the surface rise and fall.
🐂 868 bulls, holding about 838 million USDT, average cost 85567, floating loss about 60.56 million, profit ratio only 13.01%. High-level long positions face considerable pressure, whether the rebound can continue remains questionable.
🐻 1278 bears, holding about 2.89 billion USDT, average cost 76927, floating loss about 104 million, profit ratio 70.42%. Bears overall are still profitable, but not without pressure.
⚠️ Don’t rush to bet on direction today! Bull costs are above, bear costs are below, BTC is between both costs, short-term is prone to repeated tug-of-war. Do you think it will sweep the bulls first or squeeze the bears first? #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #三星Q3营业利润创新高，净利润不及预期
Samsung Q3 Earnings Report: The Most Profitable Ever, Yet Still Disappointing the Market
On October 29, Samsung Electronics delivered a "split" Q3 report: operating profit set the highest single-quarter record ever for a tech company, but net profit dragged the stock price down.
Key data at a glance:
📊 Revenue 195.25 trillion KRW, +127% YoY, record-breaking for the fourth consecutive quarter
💰 Operating profit 107.44 trillion KRW, +783% YoY, +20% QoQ, first global tech company to surpass 100 trillion KRW in a single quarter
📉 Net profit 75.21 trillion KRW, market expectation 89.06 trillion, nearly 14 trillion short
📈 Operating margin 55%, but net margin fell from 41.8% in Q2 to 38.5%
Semiconductors are the sole engine and the only "problem." The DS division posted 106.5 trillion KRW in operating profit for the quarter, contributing over 99% of the group's profit, with a margin as high as 72%. HBM4 ramp-up, server SSDs in short supply, and price hikes across all storage categories drove storage revenue to 140.7 trillion KRW, a staggering 427% YoY increase. Yet even this "money printer" fell short of analysts' optimistic forecast of 108.5 trillion KRW by about 2 trillion. The market isn't upset that it earned less, but that it didn't squeeze even higher margins amid the peak AI storage demand and tight supply.
On the other hand, smartphones are "repaying debt" to semiconductors. The MX division's revenue grew to 37.7 trillion KRW YoY, but operating profit was -600 billion KRW, compared to +3.6 trillion KRW last year. The irony: smartphones need memory, and memory price hikes are the source of Samsung Semiconductor's profit surge. Within the same group, the more upstream earns, the tougher it is for downstream terminals.
The net profit gap lies outside operations. Financial expenses of 9.5 trillion KRW reduced pre-tax profit from operating profit of 107.4 trillion to 98.5 trillion KRW, and after deducting 23.4 trillion KRW in income tax, net profit fell to 75.21 trillion KRW. This is a non-operating impact, not a slowdown in the core business, but the market showed no patience for explanations amid record profits.
After the earnings release, Samsung's stock price dropped over 6% intraday. Capital expenditure was simultaneously raised to 84.4 trillion KRW (52.7 trillion in 2025), with 76.8 trillion related to chips. This was interpreted short-term as cash flow consumption and mid-to-long term as raising concerns about whether expansion might prematurely end the storage boom.
However, industry signals have not weakened. Samsung itself warned that chip supply shortages will be more severe next year than in 2026, and plans to mass-produce HBM4E in the first half of 2027 are progressing. The drop reflects the gap of over ten trillion between single-quarter net profit and optimistic expectations, not the underlying AI storage narrative.
In summary: Semiconductors have pushed Samsung to unprecedented profit heights, while smartphones and non-operating items have brought it back under market scrutiny. Record-breaking is true, and falling short of expectations is also true. "A 1.99% buffer against the volatility of $DOGE with 50x leverage—this is the most dangerous aspect of this position."
$DOGE 50x long, 0.07659→0.07812, +99.88%. Conversely: if it falls about 2.00%, that 99% gain disappears entirely.
What does 2.00% mean for $DOGE? A normal downward spike, or even a large sell order hitting the order book. In other words, this position doesn't require any fading of bullish momentum, no trend reversal, nor anyone deliberately shorting—it only takes a technical pullback to wipe it out.
50x leverage magnifies 1.99% into 99%, and likewise magnifies 2.00% into zero. It offers huge profits but is always ready to take them back.
The market itself is holding up: price is running high. But key support below is not far away.
So I never decide to close based on "how much profit" I have, only on how far it is from the cost line. 1.99% looks like a buffer, but market volatility never makes sense.
The only move: push to break even, at worst lock in zero, and avoid expanding exposure. $BTC $ETH #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 我判断会怎么样 1.超预期概率高，但不是重点 了解EPS从1个月前的46.11美元调整到46.67美元、3个月前43.94美元——预期是逐月上修的，说明产业链景气在兑现（SK海力士、美光、希捷、西数全部报强）。加上四连超的历史记录，EPS打到48-52美元是基准论证。 但股价反应不取决于已经发生的事情，取决于Q2指引。 2.真正决定股价的三个数字 看什么及格线为什么 Q2 布线> $128.7 亿（共识）低于该数据，市场开始认定“周期见顶” 毛利率环比能否再升存储周期的顶部信号永远是毛利率先走平，而不是收入 NAND合约价是否还有新一轮涨价这是唯一的定价权证据 3. 一个必须知道的事实：市场已经在赌你“见顶” 股价$1,404.77，TTM EPS $46.07 →静态PE 30.5倍 但按FY2027推理EPS $208.94算→前瞻PE仅6.7倍 一家52周涨了641%的公司，前瞻PE仅6.7倍——这说明市场根本不信$208这个数字能持续。存储股的规律是：PE最低的时候最危险，因为那盈利热门。 4.结果与对应价位 超预期 + 强指引（Q2 > $140 亿）概率35%+12%~+2Who exactly is making money from crypto trading? The people who profit and the people who "trade crypto" are often not the same group.
On the retail side, about 70% of trading addresses incur losses, while the top 0.0385% of addresses take more than 70% of the profits; over 60% of frequent traders lose money, and among a sample of 450,000, only 254 made over $10,000.
So who is taking the money? Exchanges and market makers first take fees, profiting regardless of market conditions; insiders and manipulators exploit information asymmetry and structural advantages to harvest profits, coordinated wallets simultaneously dump assets; KOLs show public wallet losses while their related wallets profit.
The so-called "nearly 60% profitability" mostly comes from veteran players who have survived three years, while those who lost money and exited are not counted. Survivor bias is the biggest filter in the crypto world.
In short: the money made from crypto trading is not from "trading" itself, but from fees, information asymmetry, structural advantages, and harvesting rights. Retail investors are not investors—they are liquidity itself.
Therefore, both those who have lost and those temporarily profiting are just liquidity. People are inherently self-righteous, deceiving themselves and being deceived by others. They believe they are smarter than others, so we all remain in the market to prove our uniqueness, to prove we are the one-in-a-million dragon or phoenix, unaware that such cases are extremely rare.This morning I said the 14.49 million redemption by HyperLabs was nothing, but then at noon another transaction came: a certain whale transferred 387,000 HYPE to Coinbase, which at the current price I pulled is just over 30 million.
Today's HYPE news basically all goes in one direction. But the market here, current price 79.4, 24-hour low 78.14, after the morning dump it pulled back, and the fee rate is still slightly positive.
The volume comparison is even more interesting: OKX's HYPE 24-hour trading volume is 1.81 million, and this one transfer accounts for one-fifth of that, while the open interest remains steady near 100 million USD without moving. Money is moving towards exchanges, and the price still holds above 78.
78 has held twice today. When the third time will come, and whether it will hold again, I won't guess. No position changes, just watching.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 不加息的锤子一落地，BTC、ETH、$SOL 的抢跑姿势完全不同：
BTC 确为缓解性反弹旗手，一度重回 81000 上方，早间插针 79919 后迅速收回，现货 ETF 连续 3 天净流入印证机构“利空出尽”定价。但鲍威尔强调通胀仍过高，叠加 12 月加息分歧与美债收益率高悬，3 号中期选举前难有单边大涨，8 万关口仍是多空博弈核心。
ETH 堪称主流最弱，决议后弱弹不及 0.5%，完全错失红利。根因在于机构持续抛售：上周 ETH 现货 ETF 五天净流出 5.769 亿美元，为年内最大五日流出，属结构性砍仓。2400 不收复，难言反转，高 Beta 属性正被机构暂时抛弃。
SOL 则是 L1 争气包，Alpenglow 升级独立叙事叠加生态支撑，决议后弹超 1.2%，链上资金偏好明显。短期看 SOL 生态韧性足，但宏观压顶下，整体仍防回撤，轻仓防守。
美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温$BTC $ETH $ZEC 20261029
3. Large holders hold onto BTC without selling, while retail investors frantically move coins into exchanges; it hasn't been this intense in half a year
1. First, look at retail investors
In April, $5.5 billion worth of BTC was transferred to exchanges in one month; now it's $10.75 billion, doubling
Transferring coins doesn't equal selling, but coins entering exchanges means they can be sold anytime. Retail investors are scared; with the price stuck at 80,000, they want to rebound and recover losses quickly by selling
2. Then, look at the whales
Since the end of August, transfers have decreased by 36%. The volume transferred by retail investors is 2.8 times that of whales
They accumulated at low prices; selling at 80,000 isn't profitable. October's inflation data dropped by 3.3%, yet they remain inactive—not fleeing but waiting for better prices
3. Next, see who will sell
If the price rises further, large holders still won't move; all sellers will be retail investors, who will collectively flee halfway through the rise
If large holders move, sellers will double, and the crash will be faster
4. From Wednesday to Friday this week, BTC must pass through three hurdles; the first hurdle has been cleared
1. First hurdle
The Fed meeting on Wednesday has concluded, maintaining interest rates unchanged, but that doesn't mean December rates won't change
Reuters asked 100 economists: all 100 raised their hands for a rate hike in December
Some institutions also said: it's too close to the November 3 midterm elections; even if a hike is due this week, it can't happen
2. Second hurdle
Thursday's inflation data release is expected at 3.7%, while the Fed's target is 2%. The last rate cut fizzled out late, causing Bitcoin to drop from 82,000 to just over 60,000
3. Third hurdle
On Friday, $11 billion worth of Bitcoin bets expire, the largest in history📊 Latest Whale Activity Summary on the Evening of October 29 🐳
The whale market currently shows a strong sense of division. Although the bears hold an absolute advantage in total positions, the bulls are outperforming them in profit and loss ratio 📉.
From the overall data, the total whale positions reach $10.816 billion, with short positions at $5.811 billion, clearly heavier than the long positions at $5.004 billion.
But looking at profits and losses, the longs currently have unrealized gains as high as $109 million 📈, while the heavily held shorts are suffering unrealized losses of $42.6293 million.
Regarding funding fees, it's the same old story: the bulls are continuously bleeding, having cumulatively paid $66.5042 million;
while the bears comfortably collected $112 million in funding fees 💰
The bulls are holding on through funding payments, the bears are earning interest, but the market price favors the bulls.
Looking at the latest specific whale moves:
The most active shorting is on ETH: two consecutive "sell to open short" trades (1.0156 million, 1.8539 million) indicate strong conviction in shorting Ethereum.
On the BTC side, the divergence is extreme: some addresses are "selling to open short" at levels of 870,000 and 1.17 million, but there are also big players dropping $4.4435 million to "buy to open long."
The most intriguing move: a whale directly "buying to close short" for $4.2913 million, indicating some previously profitable shorts are choosing to take profits and exit or admit defeat at the current level.数据截至 18:40：HYPE 报 82.96，24 小时涨 1.3%，最近一根小时线从 79.2 一口气拉到 83.0，单小时 +4.6%、三小时 +5.3%；同一时间整个篮子跌 1.5% 到 3.7%，BTC 报 80,202、24 小时 -1.55%。这不是跟涨，这是站在对面。 先把最容易被误读的一条摆正：这不是轧空。持仓量只增了 1.16%，空头爆仓合计 2,628 美元，连个水花都不算；资金费率 0.005%、平得几乎为零，账户多空比 1.74。轧空是杠杆被打着往上抬价，这个盘面不是——是有人真金白银在现货侧把筹码拿走，做空的已经不敢再往上加。 为什么是这轮？两件真事叠在一起。第一件，9,920,000 枚的解锁窗口就落在眼前，按现价约 7.85 亿美元，这把悬了很久的剑，市场早把它算进价格里了；真到了落地那天，抛的人已经抛完，剩下的全是接货的手。第二件，HIP-3 的白名单机制上了测试网：海外老牌交易所的母公司 Payward 要做第一个受美国商品期货监管框架监管的部署方，部署方得质押 50 万枚、锁 183 天。把美国合规永续的通道接到它自己的账本上，这是估值里最贵的那一Market Overview｜Bullish Crowding, BTC, ETH, SOL Leverage Sentiment Heating Up
The Federal Reserve's early morning decision released a hawkish signal, with inflationary pressures not yet fully alleviated, suppressing short-term market sentiment. GDP and PCE data will be released tonight, and macro variables remain unresolved. The more one-sided the sentiment, the more cautious one should be about reverse fluctuations.
From the borrowing data, BTC bulls borrowed 1324.08 BTC, while bears only 72.88 BTC; ETH bulls borrowed 16,100 ETH, bears 856.89 ETH; SOL bulls borrowed 106,700 SOL, bears 3,412.31 SOL. The three major mainstream assets all show a pattern where bullish borrowing significantly exceeds bearish borrowing, indicating a clear clustering of leveraged bulls.
This means market bullish sentiment is concentrated but also increases volatility risk under crowded trades. Around the release of macro data, if expectations diverge, short-term reverse fluctuations may be amplified. What deserves more attention now is the resonance between sentiment and data, rather than a single direction.
This is only market data recording and does not constitute any investment advice.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $ETH brothers, after the FOMC announcement, Bitcoin and Ethereum didn't rise but fell instead, but the reason for this sell-off is completely different from before.
$BTC $80,140 | $ETH $2,319
Bitcoin slid from above 81,700 to around 80,140, Ethereum dropped from 2,391 to 2,319, down about 2.2% in 24 hours. The whole network liquidations reached $259 million, with shorts accounting for $156 million, a 60% ratio.
The Federal Reserve held steady, but the two dissenting votes scared the market. The FOMC voted 10:2 to keep rates unchanged, with two officials advocating a 25 basis point hike. This was the most divided vote since 2023, Powell gave no dovish signals, and risk assets surged then pulled back.
But one signal is more worth watching than the price: leverage didn’t keep up at all. This rebound was driven by short covering, not new leverage entering, so the drop is also fast.
ETF funds are still flowing in, but the differentiation is obvious. On the 28th, Bitcoin ETFs had a net inflow of $137 million, with IBIT alone accounting for $136 million. Ethereum ETFs had a net outflow of $21.4 million, ETHA lost $44.8 million, and Fidelity’s FETH gained $18.8 million, which couldn’t make up the difference.
Technically, BTC’s 80,000 is near the 365-day moving average; holding this level is necessary for recovery space. ETH’s 2,300 is a psychological threshold Saw the news: "A certain Bitcoin ETF's asset size has hit a new high again!" Did you immediately think: institutions bought a lot more coins?
Hold on, an increase in asset size could also mean the coins originally held have appreciated in price.
For example, if you own a house valued at 1 million that rises to 1.1 million. Your total property value increased by 100,000, but you didn't buy another house.
The same logic applies to ETFs. Suppose a fund holding only Bitcoin had assets originally worth 10 billion; ignoring fees and no new subscriptions, if BTC rises 10%, the size can also increase to about 11 billion.
So, "size growth of 1 billion" and "net inflow of 1 billion" are two different things.
When looking at related news, you can compare fund size, coin holdings, circulating shares, and net inflow data together, aligning the dates. Don't mistake appreciation from price increases as new buying.
Next time you see "size hits a new high," you'll know which items to check further.
Next article will discuss a contract issue: when positions are clearly profitable, why are they still automatically reduced?The $FIL FIL genesis unlock has finally finished running, and the daily new selling pressure has been cut by 75%. This is equivalent to suddenly closing three-quarters of the huge floodgate that used to hang over our heads every day.
The funniest thing is the group of shorts on the market; their positions are not small, and most are still profitable, but their average entry price is all squeezed around 0.95. Now the current price is stuck here, and if the market makers pull up a little spike, the shorts at 0.95 will have to collectively stampede to close their positions. The supply-side gate is closed, and the shorts' costs are so close above; chasing shorts now is really fueling a short squeeze.
#FIL
$FIL
👇ETF has had net inflows for three consecutive days, yet the coin price has fallen back below 80,000. Do these two markets seem like they're each doing their own thing?
Yesterday, the spot ETF had another net inflow of $137 million, marking the third consecutive day. I casually checked OKX's price; the current price is 80,287, with a 24-hour low of 79,666, still hovering below 80,000.
The futures side is even more interesting. Open Interest is still $2.58 billion, and this drop barely caused any withdrawals. The fee rate is 0.035%, and almost no one is eager to go long.
My stance: don't treat the ETF's slow money as a bottom-fishing signal. Institutions will rebalance their portfolios as they see fit, and they will boost prices as they please. Below 80,000, I'll keep watching the show and won't add any long positions.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $GOOGL, why hasn't a 25% revenue growth alleviated concerns? Alphabet's Q3 revenue was about $127.6 billion, but below market expectations; net profit dropped from about $35 billion last year to about $26.2 billion, with earnings per share of $2.12 also impacted by equity investment losses. Revenue expansion and profit decline coexist, and the market will question the return on capital expenditure. If advertising and cloud growth improve cash flow and investment losses can be excluded, the fundamentals remain strong; if spending rises and profit margins continue to decline, I would lower the valuation. Why is the sentiment in the crypto community so cold around Bitcoin's $80,000 mark? Because Bitcoin's price no longer represents the account balances of most retail investors.
The core reason is that many people's main holdings are not in Bitcoin but in altcoins, which can drop 90% and then fall another 90%. Repeated crashes, unlocking, and chasing hot trends have drained not only confidence but also the principal needed to keep participating. Some people don't want to play anymore; they simply don't have the money to continue.
Those who remain are also less willing to pay up. Projects launch with fully diluted valuations of tens of billions of dollars before their products and revenues have proven themselves, selling future expectations to retail investors in advance. New narratives lack breakthroughs, old concepts are repackaged to keep issuing tokens, and Meme has become a zero-sum game of speed and information asymmetry. After several rounds of harvesting, people naturally don't want to easily carry the burden again.
Moreover, capital has more options now. Binance announced on October 15 that its tokenized US stock product bStocks has accumulated over $40 billion in trading volume, with assets under management exceeding $1 billion. This doesn't directly prove that altcoin funds have moved to US stocks, but it does indicate that US stock assets are competing for the same users' money and attention. When participating in US stocks becomes as convenient as buying crypto, why should crypto projects expect investors to keep paying for a story that hasn't yet been realized?
Adding macroeconomic uncertainty makes it even harder for capital to sustain high risk. The market isn't completely lacking liquidity; rather, there isn't enough incremental capital willing to flow into altcoins, and the limited funds are increasingly dispersed across more tokens.Someone asked me, since the contracts are at a discount, is it time to look for a downside? My answer is just one sentence: Hold on!
Let me first present the evidence. BTC perpetual contracts are trading at about a 0.04% discount relative to spot, with shorts dominating the contracts. On the other side of the spot order book, buy orders within ±1% are actually thicker than sell orders. Buyers are reaching out first; contracts are calling for shorts, spot is taking the bids—these are not the same play.
Now looking at positions. In the past day, BTC positions shrank by 1.26%, ETH by 0.75%, SOL by 1.69%, ZEC by 10.99%. The total network positions also shrank by 1.98% to 140.507 billion, but volume actually increased by 22.61% to nearly 198 billion. Volume up, positions down—more are exiting than entering, so I’m not calling a reversal.
But the short-term picture has changed flavor. In the last hour, BTC positions increased by 0.03%, SOL by 0.15%, ETH only shrank by 0.07%, ZEC only shrank by 0.03%. The four coins basically held steady, and the momentum of a collective pullback paused. BTC is still holding above 80,000, hovering around 80,110; SOL is also sticking close to 100 without letting go. The round number support hasn’t been lost, so buyers dare to keep their bids.
So here’s my plan: before tonight’s data release, I won’t chase shorts or bottom-fish. As long as buy orders remain thick above 80,000, I’ll hold my positions and wait for the discount to narrow. If bids thin out and 80,000 breaks, I’ll exit immediately—no stubborn holding!Today is October 29, 2026. Welcome to the 4th issue of the Old Wei Bitcoin Diary market commentary:
Last night, we were all watching the Federal Reserve's interest rate changes. Today, let's do an in-depth summary.
1. Interest Rate Path:
With ten votes in favor and two against, the rate was held steady in October. However, combined with the statements from Waller and Basset and the CME probabilities, the market is betting on a 25 basis point hike in December, and possibly a 50 basis point hike in January next year. The two dissenting votes came from extreme hawks within the Democratic camp—Cook (who has always opposed Trump) and Harker (who openly called for a "sharp rate hike"), reflecting that there are still hardline voices within the Democratic Party.
2. Two Major Federal Reserve Reforms:
First, the Fed will cancel forward guidance and no longer provide the market with a future interest rate path unless a crisis occurs. This effectively cuts off the "invisible power" of the past twenty-plus years, returning pricing power to the market and economic data;
Second, starting next fall, the number of voting meetings will be reduced. In 2027, there will be one meeting for discussion only without decision-making, and in 2028, there will be two meetings without even interest rate votes. On the surface, this is a schedule adjustment, but in essence, it reduces the Fed's short-term influence on financial markets.
3. Logic for the Crypto Circle:
Previously, the biggest uncertainty in cycles came from the Fed "turning hostile" and policy reversals. If the Fed truly transforms into a data-driven, less interventionist neutral institution, the market variables will be significantly reduced. Risk assets like cryptocurrencies and U.S. stocks will actually benefit from this loosening reform that returns pricing power to economic data and the market itself. In the long run, this is a "loosening" for risk assets. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 Is the rebound before the Federal Reserve news a trend reversal or the last liquidity gathering before a waterfall drop?
My short positions are still open here, but honestly, it's not easy. On October 29, BTC is currently around 80,300 USDT, down 1.53% in 24 hours; ETH is about 2,325.55 USDT, down 1.90% in 24 hours. Both had intraday spikes followed by pullbacks, with BTC peaking at 81,788.56 and ETH at 2,391.55, indicating selling pressure remains above.
From the daily chart, BTC RSI(6) is 37.69, ETH is 31.19, both near short-term lows; however, both MACDs are still in a death cross, BTC's moving average structure is mixed, and ETH's supertrend remains bearish. Although there is net inflow of large orders, the trading volume is only about 49% of the 7-day average. I prefer to interpret this as a probe before the news rather than a clear reversal.
Before the Federal Reserve announcement, the market is most prone to liquidity sweeps both up and down. My short position size is not large; I am not betting on a one-sided waterfall drop. If the price continues to surge, I will keep room to cover and do T trades to reduce costs. What really matters is whether there is a volume-supported breakout or another failure after the spike.
The above is only market analysis and does not constitute investment advice. A quarter-end unrealized gain of $20.9 billion hits the books, yet no new grain is seen at the barn door—this is the divergence between the green shoots account and the actual receipts account.
An old farmer looks at the land by first checking the weather and then the soil moisture. That big holder hoarding Bitcoin crops will only reveal their Q3 financial report after the U.S. market closes on October 29, but the preliminary yield estimate is already laid out in the sun: a fair value gain on digital assets of about $20.9 billion. By October 4, about 848,000 Bitcoin crops were still in the field, and they had just repurchased approximately $176 million in preferred shares. What does this look like? Like standing on the ridge before harvest estimating the yield—tall stalks and heavy ears don’t mean the grains are already stored; a gust of wind can flatten the crop, forcing a recalculation of the green shoots on the books.
In the bull and bear seasons, during sowing you watch the water source, during harvest you watch the granary capacity, and in the cold winter you watch the soil fertility. The current rise in unrealized gains is like a sudden soaking rain during the grain-filling period—the landlord’s face lights up, but where the irrigation channels lead, whether the water cellar is filled, and whether the granary capacity expands—that’s the real story. Repurchasing preferred shares is like first filling in the old accounts of the water cellar to stabilize rent and morale; if the book gains continue to grow, financing methods might shift from short channels to long channels for water storage, and capital allocation will first focus on replenishing granary capacity, fixing fences, and saving seeds before expanding planting. No rush—if the accumulated temperature isn’t enough, early sowing will only rot the seedlings.
The linkage with the tokenized stock target is more like the grain tickets on the drying ground following the mother granary’s yield estimate. When the mother granary’s numbers rise, the drying ground gets lively; but grain tickets ultimately depend on actual receipts, settlement, and whether the irrigation channels have dried up. The $20.9 billion unrealized gain is chaff blown far by the wind during winnowing—not every grain falls into the sack. The tighter the linkage, the more people watch the soil moisture, and the easier it is to leave chaotic footprints on the ridge; the mid-to-long term focus should be on the financing irrigation channels and capital allocation seams, not the chaff stirred up by a gust of wind.
The $20.9 billion on the books isn’t millet—it’s green shoots that can be changed by the wind; once the financing irrigation channels change course, the first to suffer drought will always be the newly sown row. #strategyq3btcgains#Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady, December Rate Hike Disagreement Heats Up
After the FOMC dust settles, the market enters a bottoming and oscillating phase.
BTC found support after dipping to 79666, currently trading narrowly around 80210; ETH dipped to a low of 2292, now at 2322, with hourly volatility narrowing and volume significantly shrinking.
The unchanged interest rate is only a superficial result; the real pressure comes from the tug-of-war over December rate hike expectations.
The market is reluctant to make a unilateral bet, with both bulls and bears choosing to wait and see, resulting in a sideways consolidation pattern. The 20-day moving average still exerts downward pressure; this round is just a weak consolidation after a sharp drop, not a reversal.
Resistance at 80500 and 2335 is the first short-term barrier, while the lower lows serve as the defensive bottom line. The market will continue to fluctuate with upcoming inflation data.
$BTC $ETH $SNDK #Can SanDisk's storage business high growth continue? $BTC $SOL
"Last chance before the earnings report, rather than chasing after it takes off, better to position now.
The long-term logic is very strong: 15 institutions unanimously buy in, average target price 2205, the most optimistic sees 3000, the most conservative also gives 2000.
Short-term rhythm to watch: upper resistance first looks at the 1430-1500 range, below 1350 is the lifeline (moving average + dense chip area). If it falls below 1350, bulls will directly give up.
A reminder: after-hours earnings expected to have a 12% amplitude, profit and loss share the same source, don't over-leverage, set stop-loss properly!"$BTC contract longs are still crowded above 78,000, with liquidity below 80,000 pointing to the 79,700 area.
The contract market flavor is getting stronger. BTCUSDT is currently around $80,195.90, down 1.37% since UTC midnight, with a 24-hour range stretched to $79,666.90–$81,759. From a short perspective, this is not calm after a drop, but a liquidity battle where each rebound is pushed back: longs above are still hoping to recover, but the price never stabilizes.
The 1-hour MACD is still a death cross, DIFF at -216.02, green bars at -59.82; price is below the MA25 at $80,666.19, super trend pressure at $81,116.78 and maintaining downward. What worries me more is that current volume is only about 0.48 times the 7-hour average volume, so the rebound lacks sufficient volume support. The market seems to be sideways but is actually wearing down long patience.
The recent funding rate on the contract side is +0.0053%, with the next estimated at +0.0072%, meaning longs are still paying fees; the overall long ratio across accounts is about 68.96%, and top traders’ long ratio by position value is 67.33%. With longs crowded and positions increasing by 0.38% in the last hour, I’m more focused on whether stop-loss and liquidation liquidity below will be triggered in concentration.
I will not treat the short-term rebound as a trend reversal. $CT the end of the project with TVL over 1B but the Token is terrible, proving the project cannot develop long-term, holders of the CT Token do not benefit from anything from the project itself. Embedding Bitcoin into the load-bearing walls of a traditional portfolio with only a 2% reinforcement ratio—this is not just adding more positions; it's a structural test for the entire asset building. VanEck places stocks, bonds, gold, and Bitcoin into the same overall blueprint, targeting a 2% allocation, allowing adjustments between 1% and 5%, and transferring the load through spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products; Franklin Templeton’s two products are more direct, initially about 95% U.S. stocks and 5% Bitcoin, then using stock dividends to perform a secondary casting for Bitcoin. On the surface, it looks like metal lines added to the facade, but in essence, it changes the load path.
As someone who deals daily with foundations, shear walls, and settlement joints, I don’t look at renderings—I focus on whether the force transmission is continuous. The white paper is just a design plan; what truly determines the project’s value is the underlying architecture, development capability, and long-term scalability. Here, Bitcoin is not a decorative component but an embedded energy-dissipating damper in the portfolio structure: small in proportion, yet simultaneously introducing volatility, liquidity, and correlation stress lines into the main body. The adjustable range of 1% to 5% is equivalent to leaving expansion joints in the structure—reasonable in design, but in construction, the biggest fear is it becoming an excuse for constant redesign. What really decides whether this building can stand is not just writing Bitcoin into the allocation table, but the spot custody, subscription/redemption mechanisms, rebalancing discipline, and emergency plans under extreme market conditions—these are the foundational base.
Franklin’s use of dividends to continue buying Bitcoin is more like transforming cash flow into a vertical load-bearing member: increasing short-term flexibility, but in the long term, tying the dividend recovery path to a single high-volatility asset. Multi-asset portfolios moving Bitcoin from the underground garage to the standard floors means traditional capital begins to acknowledge its structural function; but acknowledgment aside, construction quality must be inspected layer by layer. The market linkage of tokenized U.S. stocks acts like stress monitoring during building reinforcement—when the underlying assets tremble, token prices, trading depth, and arbitrage channels all amplify the cracks.
So, will a small Bitcoin allocation become standard practice? From the blueprint trend, it is evolving from a landscape feature into part of the equipment layer; from an engineering judgment, 2% is not a safety factor but the starting value triggering a full structural review. When dividend cash flow is transformed into a secondary casting channel for Bitcoin, this building is no longer a simple mixed-use structure but an experimental structure with its foundation staked on volatility. #vaneckfranklinbtcetfsGoogle lost $300 billion in market value overnight; the shock in this earnings report is not in revenue but in cash flow.
Revenue hit a record high of $127.58 billion but still fell short of expectations, and earnings per share also missed the mark. More glaringly, free cash flow turned negative to about -$9 billion in a single quarter, which is extremely rare for a company long regarded as a cash cow. Capital expenditures surged to $51.4 billion, setting a new record. The market is worried about a two-year AI spending black hole, and now it's on the table.
The only bright spot was the cloud segment, with quarterly revenue around $30.7 billion, up 103% year-over-year, proving for the first time that AI demand driven by Gemini is turning into revenue. But the cloud's doubling growth can't offset the weakness in search and YouTube ads.
The trouble lies in the most profitable search ads. AI chat continues to divert search share, and growth is said to rely on loosening keyword matching, effectively increasing advertiser charges to maintain revenue. Trading ecosystem health for the earnings report itself signals pressure.
Microsoft was much steadier the same night: revenue hit a record $92.3 billion, with Azure at $33.2 billion for the quarter, up 48% year-over-year. The signal is clear: it's not about who invests more, but who can first turn AI investment into profit.
After the earnings report, 19 accounts counter-trended by adding about $20.56 million in Google long positions, betting on a rebound from a wrong sell-off. Crypto was relatively resilient; $BTC held steady near $80,000, and $ETH stabilized in sync, but tech stock sell-offs still weighed on risk sentiment.
The $290 to $300 range will decide whether this is a wrong sell-off buying opportunity or the start of a valuation reset.The market will next focus on the US PCE inflation data and GDP growth performance. These two indicators may further influence the Federal Reserve's policy expectations, but the real determinant of market direction is not just the data itself, but how the market interprets them. 🔥 Three possible market scenarios: 🔴 Scenario 1: Inflation rebound If PCE exceeds expectations, US Treasury yields and the US dollar may continue to strengthen, tightening financial conditions further, and BTC and ETH could face greater correction pressure. 🟢 Scenario 2: Inflation cools down, economy remains resilient This is the combination risk assets prefer to see. If inflation gradually declines while GDP remains resilient, market confidence in a soft landing may strengthen, providing support to the crypto market. ⚠️ Scenario 3: GDP significantly slows Economic growth weakness may rekindle recession concerns and raise market expectations for future rate cuts. In the short term, BTC and ETH may not immediately rise, and risk-off sentiment could first bring about sharp volatility. 🎯 Trading focus: The Federal Reserve maintaining rates unchanged does not mean market risks have disappeared. What to watch next is the interplay between inflation, economic growth, the US dollar, and US Treasury yields. Don't just look at whether the data is bullish or bearish; also observe whether BTC can hold key support, whether ETH shows relative strength, and whether volume can confirm the direction. Wait for the market to provide answers before deciding to enter. Do not chase gains, nor blindly add positions due to short-term fluctuations. #FedKeepsRa$300 million locked assets matter more to me than celebrity titles. I judge that this news, following the stablecoin's move toward practical application, will strengthen sector sentiment but does not mean the price trend is confirmed. London stablecoin company OpenTrade appointed former Swift CEO Lazaro Campos as chairman and disclosed an annual trading volume exceeding $1 billion.
I have three rules for trends: look at the fundamentals, not the halo effect—locked assets carry more weight than appointment news, but scale does not equal asset quality; look at sustainability, not hype—only if subsequent business scale continues to grow will I raise my assessment of this sector; look for price confirmation, not substitute news for trend—the sentiment boost and trend establishment are two different things.
Trends are the best friend; I don't jump the gun based on a single news item. When encountering such stablecoin positives, do you now judge the trend by trading volume, moving averages, or business data?Seeing an exchange publish a proof of reserves with a reserve ratio over 100%, does that mean you can completely relax?
Don’t just focus on that percentage; you also need to see what it actually proves.
It’s like a store showing you its warehouse: the goods are indeed there, which is valuable information. But to understand the whole store’s situation, you also need to know how much debt it owes, whether the goods are collateralized, and when the inventory was taken.
Proof of reserves is the same. Some verify specific assets against corresponding user balances and even let you verify if your own balance is included. But which coins and which liabilities are covered must be checked in the report’s scope; you can’t just generalize it to mean "all company debts are covered."
Also consider timing: the asset status in the last snapshot doesn’t automatically represent the current moment.
When opening the report, look for four things first: the date of the statistics, covered assets, liability scope, and personal verification entry. Understanding these is more useful than just comparing who has the higher reserve ratio number.
Next article will discuss another easily misunderstood percentage: why does the Bitcoin market dominance rise while the coin price keeps falling?FOMC results announced, but BTC fell below $80,000. The market's real concern is not the unchanged interest rate.
The Federal Reserve officially announced the October interest rate decision early today.
The final vote was 10 to 2 to maintain the interest rate at 3.75% to 4%.
The result met market expectations.
But there is a detail worth noting.
Two officials actually supported a 25 basis point rate hike.
Moreover, the Fed upgraded its description of U.S. economic growth from solid to strong,
indicating that the U.S. economy still has considerable resilience.
The problem is that inflationary pressure has not completely disappeared.
The market is beginning to reassess the possibility of a rate hike in December.
BTC initially rebounded briefly but then fell below $80,000 again.
ETH and other altcoins also came under pressure.
What I think is most noteworthy this time is
that an unchanged interest rate does not mean monetary policy is easing.
If the economy remains strong but inflation does not come down,
the Fed has no reason to rush to cut rates.
For crypto assets that heavily rely on market liquidity,
the future trends of U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar may be more important than this rate decision.
Do you think BTC is undergoing a shakeout before the bad news is fully priced in,
or is the market beginning to reprice the risk of rate hikes?
$BTC $ETH #聯準會維持利率不變，12月升息分歧升溫 The harshest reality in the market is: performance growth does not equal stock price increase, nor does it guarantee that risk assets will strengthen. Samsung's semiconductor business profits soared about 15 times year-on-year, but the actual performance was slightly below market expectations. Subsequently, BTC fell below $80,000 from above $81,700, triggering a chain liquidation in the crypto futures market, with a total liquidation amount of about $356 million, of which longs accounted for $205 million. What truly deserves attention is not just this drop, but the underlying macro logic: 🔹 The Federal Reserve holding steady does not mean interest rate pressure disappears. Market expectations for a rate hike in December rose from 76% a week ago to 86%. 🔹 U.S. Treasury yields broke through 5%, putting liquidity under pressure. As the yield on risk-free assets continues to rise, high-valuation tech stocks and crypto assets may face valuation reappraisals. 🔹 AI capital expenditure is impacting the crypto market. Chip companies' profits, AI infrastructure investments, long-term interest rates, and dollar liquidity are becoming key variables affecting BTC's short-term trend. Coupled with high leverage, even a slight expectation gap can trigger large-scale liquidations. What's more interesting is that despite market pressure, Bitwise still made a long-term forecast: Bitcoin could reach $1.6 million by 2036. Short-term macro pressure and long-term bullish narratives can coexist. The former determines how the market prices risk, while the latter bets on Bitcoin's growth potential over the next decade. My view: Do not treat long-term targets as short-term support, nor should you... I checked the community sentiment around noon and was a bit shocked: on the platform, 77% of votes on $PEPE are bullish, only 4% are bearish, with 140 related discussions in 24 hours. Such a one-sided sentiment is uncommon in a volatile market, indicating that consensus is already forming.
There's also a story going viral these days: a wallet spent $27 in April 2023 to buy 2.5 trillion PEPE, now worth $12 million. Although this wallet was later blacklisted by the developers and the coins can't move, it hasn't stopped this story from going viral across the internet.
Think about the logic of this spread: people aren't sharing "someone got stuck," but rather "$27 turned into $12 million." The core fuel of meme coins is this kind of wealth-creation narrative; every viral story drives traffic to the pool. What do retail investors see? "Maybe next time it will be me." The spread of this FOMO sentiment has appeared before every meme market rally in history.
Looking at the market coordination: the price is steady around 0.000005, up 12.68% in 7 days, up 83.78% in 90 days, consolidating at a high level but with strong support. Sentiment, stories, and price trends are all aligned now.
Some say that 77% bullish means the market is topping out. My view is the opposite: in the early to mid stages of a trend, rising sentiment is fuel; it’s only dangerous when everyone is talking about it and it’s on every street corner. Now? The spread is just getting started.#微软Q1营收增长，Azure增速至48%超预期
Microsoft $MSFT released its earnings report yesterday, overall beating expectations but not spectacularly.
Revenue was about $92.2 billion, up 19% year-over-year, with adjusted EPS of $4.89, all better than expected.
Azure cloud business grew 48%, still the core growth engine; free cash flow declined year-over-year but remained positive.
After-hours stock price rose about 3%, a mild positive reaction, consistent with the expectation of "good data but high valuation."
Currently, I am bullish on Microsoft; compared to other tech stocks heavily investing in AI, its cash flow is more resilient, and cloud growth remains strong, making it a "relatively more stable" long position.
When selecting such tech stocks, pay attention to:
1. Don't just look at whether revenue and profit beat expectations; more importantly, how much free cash flow remains;
2. Changes in cloud business growth are more important than overall numbers;
3. Capital expenditure guidance is more sensitive than quarterly results.
If spending efficiency worsens or cloud growth slows, the stock price tends to react first.
Now, the focus on tech stocks has shifted from "how fast growth is" to "how long the cash can last."