Orbit Post Sitemap
Conclusion first: This morning's drop erased the confirmation of the rise above 80,845 from last night. I won't chase in the afternoon; if 80,000 doesn't hold, weakness must be acknowledged. Data speaks: BTC 80,378, 24h -0.69%, daily high 81,823, low 79,710, this morning's lowest touched around 79,858 then climbed back above 80,000; ETH 2,327, -1.25%, still below 2,400; SOL 100.6, -1.37%. Fees near zero, no one is rushing to go long, and no fuel for a short squeeze. 80,845 has now turned into resistance; if it can't be reclaimed, don't talk about strengthening. Tonight at 20:30, PCE and GDP will set the direction; before the data, I will only watch this small rebound, not follow it. A question to choose one: In the afternoon, should we hold 80,000 and wait for the data, or break below the 79,710 low first? I choose to hold and wait for the data, and accept being wrong if so.$NEAR NEAR's buying pressure these days is like a bottomless pit. Every time the bears try to push down, the buy orders at the bottom swallow them whole. The trading volume has jumped from the usual tens of millions directly to over ninety million, clearly showing that funds are blindly scooping up. Just check the HSP-029 proposal, which is currently voting to cut the annual issuance from 2.5% directly down to 1.6%, effectively changing the medium- to long-term supply and demand fundamentals. No wonder the support at this level is so strong; big players are all betting on the production cut passing.
#NEAR
$NEAR
👇Settlement is around November 1st, and I care more about this deadline than the probability decline. Seeing Bitcoin's price touch expectations cool down, the common interpretation is bearish.
On the other hand, I tend to see it as a revaluation of time risk: first, the closer to settlement, the less time left for the price touch; second, even without a price touch, it could still rise, and this binary bet can't accommodate the expectation of a moderate rise. Do you think this change mainly bets on direction, or on insufficient remaining time? Opposing opinions are welcome for debate.📌Big Brother Maji: On the same day, Bored Ape entered the art museum, and the contract exploded 5 times in an hour with $ETH
▪️Good news: Bored Ape was selected for the Los Angeles County Museum of Art's digital collection, and he participated in the project preparation
▪️Painful liquidation: Two mutant apes held for 3 years were sold at a large discount, and the funds were injected into the contract
▪️Capital trajectory: Last year Hyperliquid earned 44.84 million U｜150,000 in August rolled up to 12.3 million｜Lost to only 20,000 in two months, overall a loss of 36.85 million
▪️Outcome: On the 24th, ETH dropped to 2282, five forced liquidations in one hour, account left with only 5000U; on the 27th, funds further shrank to 4517.7U
💡Viewpoint: The long-term narrative of NFTs and high-leverage contracts are completely different worlds. Even with brilliant past performance, the tolerance for heavy rolling positions is extremely low, and wealth drawdown only requires one reverse market move.
⚠️Story review only, not investment advice Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 as Asian trading opened is not merely a headline number. It marks a change in who is doing the selling. On Hyperliquid, the net spot-futures positioning of large whales flipped to net short for the first time since March, a rare reversal that carries more weight than the price level itself. $BTC traded near $79,700, and repeated rebounds toward $81,500 and $80,200 failed to hold. The flow data explains why. Spot ETFs had already bled $770 million before a modest $11$NEAR whales are leading the shorting of $NEAR, while retail investors are still holding on stubbornly.
Whales' long-short positions overwhelmingly lean bearish, while retail accounts are clustered on the bullish side. It's clear who's running and who's catching.
The project team minted $13 million new tokens in a single month but only used a tiny fraction for buybacks. This issuance faucet is wider than a water pipe, basically scooping water with a sieve.
The most outrageous part is that the so-called $1.9 million buyback amount isn't even burned; it all goes straight into the project's own pockets.
Playing left hand to right hand skillfully, this endless selling pressure situation means anyone catching below is basically doing charity.
#NEAR
$NEAR
👇$AXIS is no longer withdrawing coins to exchanges for selling; the project team finds it too troublesome, so they sell directly on-chain. Just this one address 0xffb7303088f1dc9743710532b8d33f5d73d029c0 sold over 700,000 USDT in one hour. This coin is really something, hahahaBTC 在吸金，ETH 和 SOL 却在漏钱，这画面有点微妙。 你最近是不是也有种"热闹是他们的，我这边仓位没怎么动"的感觉？ - 月 27 日那天我盯着 ETF 数据看了好一会儿：美国现货比特币 ETF 单日净流入 1.76 亿美元，以太坊 ETF 反而流出 6020 万，Solana 相关产品也少了约 1900 万。把这几条放一起，总盘子其实还是正的，约 9490 万美元。数字不难看，但结构很诚实——钱不是回来了，是挑着地方停。 这种选择性让我想到一个词：犹豫型贪婪。嘴上说想加仓，手指却只肯点最熟悉的那一个。BTC 拿到净流入，说明避险和进攻两种情绪在它身上叠住了，大家把它当"风险资产里最像安全垫"的那档。ETH 和 SOL 被抽走，未必是叙事崩了，更像是资金在等一个更明确的催化，暂时不愿意为"下一步"提前买单。 偏多的路径也清楚：只要 BTC 这边的净流入能连着几天站住，情绪会先修复，然后才轮到 ETH 补涨、再往后才是山寨的轮动。顺序大概率不会反过来。反过来看，如果总流入还在正区间、但内部一直靠 BTC 单腿撑，这种正数是有水分的——一旦 BTC 自己走弱，整个盘子会很快翻脸，October 29 Midday | 80,000 Recovered, Funds Replenished but Price Did Not Follow
BTC 80,900 (+0.4%): After breaking below 80,000 to 79,669 in the early morning, buying support led to a rebound. The institutional cost line at 80,200 has turned into resistance, with 81,600-81,900 as confirmation levels above. ETF inflows totaled 286 million over two days, 90% from BlackRock, but price follow-through is weak; money returned but price did not.
ETH 2,308 (-0.1%): The daily chart broke below the lower edge of the ascending channel; 2,293-2,300 is a key defense line, and if lost, look to 2,250; strong resistance at 2,350 above. ETF net outflow in October was 1.32 billion, the largest monthly outflow since November last year, indicating continued capital bleeding.
ZEC 1,245 (-4.9%): Quickly fell from 1,348 at midday; 1,294-1,300 is the breakout starting point, and breaking below 1,290 means breakout failure. Over the past hour, bulls liquidated about 1.69 million; leverage is being cleared.
On the macro front, the FOMC held steady but the probability of a rate hike in December rose to 86%, with long-term interest rate pressure unresolved. ETF inflows are hard to move prices; rebounds mostly rely on short covering. Defense bottom lines: 79,700 (BTC), 2,293 (ETH), 1,290 (ZEC).
$BTC $ETH $ZEC #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC On Wednesday Eastern Time, BTC spot ETFs once again attracted a net inflow of $137 million, totaling $424 million over three consecutive days, with unstoppable momentum of continuous capital inflow. October's capital flow has seen a dramatic reversal, shifting from a previous net outflow of $26 million to a net inflow of $111 million, with 99% of this inflow concentrated in IBIT alone, showing a very clear trend of institutional clustering.
In contrast, ETH remains a tale of two extremes, with a continuous net outflow of $170 million over three days, and selling pressure remains unabated.
What is even more intriguing is the market hedging: during the Asian session, BTC briefly fell below the 80,000 mark, with price under pressure and plunging, yet Wall Street institutional funds did not stop entering the market.
This is a typical case of "market price drop while quietly accumulating base positions," with short-term price volatility, but the mid-to-long-term institutional allocation logic continues, and the pattern of capital differentiation remains clear.
#BTC现货ETF资金反复，市场买盘能否企稳？ @八佰哥爱理财 $PUMP 24-hour protocol revenue ranking from a capital perspective (only protocols with tokens traded on Binance are counted):
No.1 $PUMP Pump｜$1.89 million
No.2 $HYPE Hyperliquid｜$1.65 million
No.3 $SKY Sky｜$429,000
No.4 WLFI World Liberty Financial｜$369,000
No.5 UNI Uniswap｜$241,000
Total on the list: $4.58 million, reflecting real user demand behind it. Pump alone contributes $1.89 million.
What we care about is: for protocols with high revenue, whether the token has a corresponding buyback design—this relates to whether the revenue will be transmitted to the token.
According to the habits of large investors, the fundamentals are usually screened with two metrics: market cap divided by annualized revenue (similar to price-to-sales ratio), and the portion of revenue flowing to token holders. These are just starting points; you also need to check concentration of holdings and the project team's token arrangements. Are you on board with this? $UNI $HYPE $BNB
I don't recognize the 750 level as a valid breakout. It did dip below this in the morning, hitting a low of 743.76, but within just over an hour it recovered to 758. The total contract volume for the day was only $64 million, so there wasn't much selling or buying pressure.
There's another point on the chart: Jenner hard fork has launched on the testnet, bringing a Payment Lane upgrade to the payment channel. Previously, such news could push the price up, but now it barely makes a splash. The BSC narrative phase is long over; BNB now just follows the overall market.
Positions don't seem panicked either; contract open interest is around $56 million, with funding rates below 0.01%, and longs are still paying a small premium. When it broke 750, I didn't see any cascade liquidations—it looked more like a wick sweeping liquidity.
Of course, reclaiming 750 doesn't mean it's stable; if the market takes another hit, BNB will follow. But this move doesn't look like a trend.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 Tonight, there is little suspense about the interest rate; over 90% of the chips are already held steady. The real variable lies in the wording of the statement and the tone of the press conference: will the option to raise rates in December remain? Some treat the exhaustion of bad news as good news, but this judgment is only half correct. The expectation of a rate hike in December has reached 70%, and the hawkish bets seem to be fully priced in early. However, with Walsh's hawkish background, if more dissenting votes appear in the statement or the press conference blocks the path, the market could still turn sour. More tricky is that the key inflation and growth data will only come tomorrow night; lacking new basis tonight, the wording will likely leave room for maneuver, and this ambiguity is most likely to cause back-and-forth fluctuations.
On the market front, $BTC is consolidating above 80,000, with restrained position increases; $ETH follows the trend but with greater elasticity, more front-running, and quicker reversals; SOL remains volatile with big swings, often showing upper and lower wicks on decision nights; ZEC has been overheated recently, and the hotter it gets, the less advisable it is to chase; after news is released, it is often the first to be sold off.
I tend not to bet on direction before the decision, first reducing some positions and keeping flexible funds to wait for the results. If the wording is soft, wait for a pullback to hold the key level before considering following; if the wording is hard, don't rush to catch the falling knife either, as tomorrow night's data may still deliver another blow. Tonight is a test of patience, not speed. Personal observations: BTC targets 82,000, ETH 2,400, SOL 110, ZEC 1,350, verifying as we go. #10月FOMC利率决议即将公布 #SK海力士Q3营收首破100万亿韩元 ⚠️ Pausing rate hikes does not mean a positive signal
The Federal Reserve maintained the interest rate range at 3.75%-4.00% this time, with a hawkish policy tone: the 10:2 voting result showed two members advocated an immediate 25 basis point hike, the statement continued to emphasize economic resilience and elevated inflation, and the market's expectation for a December rate hike has risen to about 86%.
This pause in rate hikes has been fully priced in, and the decision did not drive any unexpected moves; the crypto market remained generally flat. BTC and ETH fluctuated less than 2% throughout the day, with volatility not exceeding the previous trading day's range, contrasting with the market's expectation of a sharp move; U.S. stocks showed more noticeable volatility due to differences in market participant structure, capital scale, and trading logic, so amplitude cannot be directly compared.
From the market perspective, BTC pulled back to around $80,400 after reaching a high of $81,674, with support seen at the $80,000 level and core resistance between $81,600-$82,000. Without volume to firmly hold above, this is only a rebound and not a trend breakout. ETH underperformed BTC, retreating to $2,328 with weak support, resistance at $2,350-$2,380, and a likely test of previous lows if it breaks below $2,300.
On the macro level, the market is divided; high interest rates and energy inflation pressures remain, and risk appetite has not substantially increased. This decision is only a phased outcome; the policy direction in December will be the main theme for subsequent market moves. Operations should remain cautious and avoid blindly chasing gains, focusing on BTC's volume breakout and ETH's synchronization.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC $ETH $SNDK
There's a funny detail. Last quarter, SanDisk's revenue was $9 billion, 5.7% higher than market expectations, and EPS exceeded by more than 10%. After the earnings report, the stock price jumped directly. This quarter, the market appetite is whetted; the earnings report comes out after the U.S. stock market closes tonight, with expectations directly at $10.7 billion.
In the past 6 earnings reports, it moved an average of 6.9% the next day. This time, options only bet ±8.1%, which is not outrageous. The SNDK token on OKX is now at 1365, fluctuating between 1338 and 1421 intraday, with contract nominal value close to $90 million.
My view is simple: before the earnings report, this asset is just a bet on size. The on-chain token opens and closes in sync with the U.S. stock market; when the data comes out at 2 a.m., it gaps up or down to digest it, and all the leverage in between is fuel. Last quarter, I saw someone make a profit by positioning before the earnings, and also saw overnight gaps wipe out margin.
So I don't touch it. I'll wait to see how it digests the earnings report before commenting.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 💻 Occupational hazard kicked in. When I see this kind of "whether the price will be touched" prediction, I want to first review the requirements, then look at the probabilities. On Polymarket, the YES probability for "Will Bitcoin reach $82,500 in October" is currently 22%, down 34 percentage points in the past 24 hours, with trading volume around $77,097 during the same period. The market will settle around November 1, 2026.
My judgment: This information is more suitable for checking the market's assessment of "time-limited price touch" rather than directly serving as a trend score for $BTC. The same target price plus a deadline is a different question.
Logically, touching the price once and sustaining above it are not the same; moreover, if the remaining observation time shortens, even if the long-term trend judgment remains unchanged, the probability of price touch may decrease. This is my speculation and cannot be used to definitively explain the recent drop.
A potential bug is incomplete input: one day's trading volume cannot directly indicate order book depth, and 22% is only the collective judgment of bettors. If it were me, I would first check the basis for the price touch, the cutoff time, and the bid-ask spread before deciding whether this probability set has analytical value, rather than misjudging the market just because of a sharp drop.
Everyone, help me review: before interpreting this 22%, would you prioritize verifying the price touch settlement rules or the order book depth? What key variable am I missing in my logic?[Ethereum Prepares to Introduce Quantum-Resistant Mechanisms to Counter Future Quantum Computing Threats]
$ETH is proactively addressing the potential issue of future quantum computers breaking the existing signature system. The latest draft of EIP-8450 plans to have validators pre-register quantum-resistant public keys using a hash-based leanXMSS scheme, paving the way for switching the validator signature mechanism in the future. Simply put, it means registering backup keys in advance and officially activating them when the protocol upgrades.
Ethereum currently relies on BLS signatures, which are vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers, while leanXMSS builds the signature system based on hash functions. However, quantum-resistant signatures are larger in size and lack the native aggregation advantages of BLS, so future challenges include improving verification efficiency and reducing network load. The Ethereum Foundation's roadmap targets core quantum-resistant infrastructure around 2029.
This draft is still in the Draft stage, and the keys registered by validators will not be used for actual consensus duties for now. What’s truly worth watching is whether it can enter upgrade plans, client implementations, and testnets later—this is about laying the groundwork early.$GOOGL Google's latest earnings report is truly a tale of two extremes
Revenue reached $127.6 billion, up 25% year-over-year, but earnings per share of $2.12 fell far short of the expected $3.02, causing the stock to plunge nearly 10% in after-hours trading
Personally, I think this is the final drop, with support around 280; depending on the situation, I might add to my position
The highlight of this earnings report is all in the cloud segment, with Google Cloud revenue soaring 103% year-over-year, operating profit nearly doubling, and operating margin hitting 36.2%. However, AI spending is burning cash fiercely, with quarterly capital expenditures at $51.4 billion, and free cash flow plunging to negative $9.065 billion, compared to a positive $24.4 billion in the same period last year. During the call, management was candid, admitting that AI search monetization is still low but painted a promising picture — 2027 will be the "harvest year," with TPU revenue expected to scale up Google's earnings report today has two numbers that I think are especially worth looking at together👀
In Q3, Google Cloud revenue grew 103% year-over-year, and operating profit more than doubled; but at the same time, Google's quarterly free cash flow outflow was about $9.1 billion
Here lies the contradiction:
The AI business is indeed generating revenue, and the growth rate is quite astonishing. Google's own TPU has also started to become an important growth driver for the cloud business
But to meet these demands, Google is continuously building data centers and purchasing equipment, with capital expenditures even exceeding the cash generated from operating activities
This is also why after the earnings release, the market didn't react with much excitement, and $GOOGL stock actually dropped 10%
I think the biggest controversy in the AI industry is gradually becoming clear:
People no longer doubt whether AI can generate revenue; they are more concerned about how much capital needs to be invested upfront to make that money and how long it will take to recoup it
Going a little long on Google to profit from the panic sentiment😇
#CanGoogleEarningsHoldTheBase [The Fed Didn't Raise Rates, But December Rate Hike Expectations Are Still Burning]
The Fed voted 10 to 2 to keep rates at 3.75%–4%, with two officials even advocating for an immediate 25 basis point hike. Actually, economic growth remains fairly strong, but inflation stubbornly refuses to come down. Rate cuts are off the table, and rate hikes are back on the table. At the September meeting, 16 of 18 officials expected at least one more hike before year-end.
The market has already priced this in: the 10-year Treasury yield is approaching 5%, and the probability of a December hike once rose to 84%, then fell back to about 78% after the decision. This shows that holding rates steady was already expected; what really has investors conflicted is what comes next. High yields raise the opportunity cost of holding gold and put pressure on high-valuation assets like tech stocks. The crypto market is similarly unable to stay completely unaffected, which is one reason why $BTC has been fluctuating so much—macro factors are too significant.
Next up are the US Q3 GDP preliminary figures and September PCE, which will be the real tests: if the economy is strong and inflation remains high, the case for more hikes grows; if inflation cools, the market can finally breathe easier. The biggest problem now isn’t that the Fed has already hiked, but that the market must recalculate whether this tightening cycle is truly over or not.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 Google Q3 earnings report (after market close on October 28, Eastern Time) before release, I was somewhat optimistic: search remains resilient, cloud growth expected to exceed expectations. Actual revenue was $127.58 billion, up 25%, slightly below the expected $128.2 billion; cloud revenue was $30.7 billion, a huge 103% increase exceeding expectations, but search at $63.35 billion and YouTube ads both fell short of expectations. Capital expenditure was $51.36 billion, up 114% year-over-year, free cash flow was negative for two consecutive quarters (-$9.07 billion), combined with equity investment losses of $8.66 billion, shares dropped over 10% after hours. Market focus has shifted from "whether AI demand exists" to "when investments will pay off"; meanwhile, Microsoft Azure grew 48% in the same period, with its stock rising nearly 3% after hours, creating a contrast. Bulls point to cloud backlog of $561 billion and TPU volume growth, bears point to declining search monetization rate and capital expenditure exceeding $300 billion by 2027.
Reference points: revenue vs. expectations, cloud and search segment data; capital expenditure, free cash flow, and equity investment losses; Microsoft comparison; cloud backlog and 2027 capital expenditure guidance, search monetization rate controversy.
Your judgment on which parts are correct and which did not materialize: cloud indeed exceeded expectations ($30.7 billion vs. expected $29.1 billion, profit margin rose to 36.2%); but the "search resilience" claim was disproved—the management admitted that AI-driven query volume growth brought lower monetization rates, with exchange rates and retail advertisers also dragging down results. And your biggest concern, capital expenditure and free cash flow, turned out to be the main reasons for valuation cuts. #谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 If I were to write it as a strategy, I would try a simple rule: after opening a short position, if N consecutive candlesticks do not break below the low of the first candlestick after opening, then exit. Core Trader 57 just opened a short on $SOL with 6x leverage, a nominal position of about $52,700, and the result is still unknown. What I want to study is not guessing the direction correctly, but how long to give the judgment a validation period. 🤖
This is the rule I drafted, not his strategy. The advantage is that during sideways movement, you don't have to wait indefinitely, freeing up capital; and with 6x leverage, if the price rebounds 1%, estimating by nominal position divided by leverage, the margin loss is about 6%, excluding fees, so delay also has a cost. But the flaw is obvious: the market may first consolidate before dropping, and a time stop loss might misjudge slow signals as wrong signals, and frequent exits will accumulate costs.
As a quantitative newbie, I will backtest first and not set parameters based on a single trade. If you were to write the conditions, would you choose to exit after 4 consecutive 15-minute candles without a new low, or use a price stop loss? Why?Microsoft’s Azure growth accelerated. Keeping pace with demand is an infrastructure challenge as well as a sales story.
Fiscal Q1 2027 results for the quarter ended Sep 30 included:
• Revenue: $92.3B, up 19% YoY
• Operating income: $45.9B, up 21%
• GAAP net income: $36.6B, up 32%
• GAAP diluted EPS: $4.92
Azure revenue grew 48% in reported and constant-currency terms, versus 42% in the prior quarter. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $63.9B, up 30%. Azure is included in that total, not a separate amount to add to it.
Commercial remaining performance obligations reached $677B, up 73% YoY but broadly unchanged from $678B last quarter. This includes unearned revenue and amounts to be invoiced and recognized in future periods.
A large contractual pipeline provides visibility, but its size alone does not establish the pace of future revenue growth or profitability.
Microsoft Cloud’s gross margin was 66%, versus 68% a year earlier and 65% last quarter. It improved sequentially while remaining below the year-earlier level.
The outlook points to continued expansion. Management forecast Azure growth of 49%-50% in constant currency next quarter, with demand still exceeding supply. This is guidance, not growth already delivered.
Q1 capital expenditures, including finance leases, reached $45.2B. Management also flagged delays in some third-party capacity deliveries, bringing deployment timing into focus alongside the spending figure.
Spending, capacity becoming available and customer usage do not necessarily arrive together. Deployment and utilization help determine when infrastructure can contribute to revenue and cash generation.
The quarter combines faster Azure growth with a substantial build-out. The next phase is about matching capacity with demand while managing the economics of serving it.
Can Microsoft sustain cloud momentum as new capacity comes online?
#MicrosoftQ1AzureSurges $BTC hovered around 80,000 all day, with little price movement, but there was turnover underneath. ETF capital inflow has clearly cooled down, with net inflow in the past two weeks down to only 67 million, while short liquidations accounted for more than 70%, indicating that those eager to exit have mostly done so. What’s really worth watching isn’t the candlestick chart, but the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency finalizing the stablecoin regulatory framework; the rules are landing ahead of the price.
The A-share market is playing only one script today: money is fleeing to places that pay interest. The combined market value of the four major banks’ A+H shares surpassed 10 trillion for the first time in history, with ICBC and CCB continuing to hit new highs, but the ChiNext Index crashed 3.6%, Tianfu Communication approached a 20% limit down, and computing hardware was collectively hit. No one is exiting the market, just moving from overvalued areas to places where they can sleep peacefully.
The real watershed is after-hours in the U.S. stock market. $MSFT Azure growth surged to 48%, rising nearly 3% after hours; $GOOGL missed both revenue and profit, with free cash flow plunging to negative 9 billion, falling nearly 10% after hours. Storage chips soared during the day but collectively gave back gains after hours. On the same day, the market only recognizes one thing: whether you have real cash flow in hand.#Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady, December Rate Hike Disagreement Heats Up? Impact on Macroeconomy? Impact on $BTC?
The Fed's current "pause" is actually a hawkish pause, showing a divergence in impact on the macroeconomy and Bitcoin.
Macroeconomy: The statement upgraded the economic assessment to "strong expansion," and the probability of a rate hike in December rose to about 78%. This means high interest rates will persist longer, borrowing costs will remain high, continuously suppressing interest rate-sensitive real estate and small to medium enterprises. However, economic resilience exceeded expectations, reducing short-term recession risk, with the market pricing in a "soft landing" rather than a "recession."
Bitcoin: After the decision, BTC only rose slightly by about 0.2%, showing a muted reaction since the pause was fully priced in. The real pressure lies in the expectation of a December rate hike: if it happens, rising U.S. Treasury yields will withdraw funds from risk assets, with BTC, as a high-volatility asset, being hit first. Short-term focus is on the $80,000 support level, with subsequent trends depending on November inflation and employment data confirming the rate hike path. Yesterday's interest rate decision gave nothing much to expect, and indeed there was no significant movement!
I think Waller's speech was hawkish; two phrases in his speech were particularly interesting: "intense debate" and "independent colleagues"!
I remember Waller said in his second speech after taking office that he got along well with other Fed officials, but this time the speech somewhat highlighted the internal division within the Federal Reserve.
It shows that Waller's work at the Fed is not going smoothly, and his policies face some obstacles, big or small. It seems he hasn't had any clear policy implementation since taking office, which might be one reason he refrains from giving the market forward guidance. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温
The boot has officially dropped ✅ The October FOMC maintained the interest rate at 3.75%-4.00% as expected, fully in line with market consensus, but the voting structure directly revealed hawkish concerns 📉
This decision passed with a 10:2 vote to keep rates unchanged, with two voters opposing and advocating a 25BP hike. Even the centrist voters shifted hawkish, marking the clearest sign of internal division recently.
Dollar Index: After the announcement, it quickly dipped then rebounded, a typical "bad news fully priced in shakeout". The daily chart held short-term trend support, the bullish structure remains intact, and as long as the range holds, December rate hike expectations will continue to support a stronger dollar with volatility.
Gold: After a spike, it quickly fell back closing with a long upper shadow, a classic technical pattern of expectations being fulfilled and positive news realized. Profit-taking pressure from bulls at high levels was concentrated and released, entering short-term resistance and correction, with a clear upper resistance zone, making a one-sided new high difficult.
BTC: Moving in sync with US stocks in a narrow range, daily remains stuck in a key central zone. Currently, it is a complete vacuum of news and a wait-and-see stance on expectations, with no directional breakout. Up and down spikes and shakeouts remain the main theme, as the main players await further clarity on the December rate path.
The core of this decision is not "no rate hike," but the public exposure of hawkish divisions within the Fed. It seems to stabilize the market but actually plants uncertainty for the year-end market. Short-term sentiment cools, mid-term competition intensifies, and the year-end performance of all assets basically depends on December inflation data and the final rate decision.
$2Z The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady at 3.75%–4.00% early this morning, marking a hawkish pause: two board members advocated for an additional 25 basis points hike, the statement removed dovish language, and the market is now waiting for "when the next rate hike will be" rather than a rate cut. The US dollar index fell 0.22%, but BTC slid from above 80,000 to 79,862, down 1.22%, ETH dropped 2.13%, falling about 4% over seven days, both hovering near the lower bound of the 7-day range. External factors compounded: September CPI rose to 3.7%, oil prices broke above 100, core PCE is pending release; Google fell over 10% after hours dragging down tech sentiment; ETHA continues to see outflows. Risk appetite remains weak, rooted in policy path uncertainty rather than the absence of rate cuts. Is it going to crash $BTC
Every time after the US midterm elections, Bitcoin always gets hammered, no exceptions in 2014, 2018, and 2022
Another election next Tuesday, will this time be any different?Brothers, after the FOMC announcement, BTC and ETH didn't rise but fell, but the reason for this sell-off is different from before.
$BTC $80,270 | $ETH $2,323
Bitcoin slid from 81,800 to around 80,270, Ethereum dropped from 2,391 to 2,323. The whole network liquidated $57.53 million, with shorts accounting for 75.3%.
The Federal Reserve held steady, but the two dissenting votes scared the market. The FOMC maintained rates at 10:2, with two officials advocating a 25 basis point hike, marking the most divided vote in 2023. Powell's press conference gave no dovish signals, and risk assets surged then retreated.
But one signal is more worth watching than the price: leverage didn't keep up. When BTC rose 2.3%, open interest actually dropped 0.1%, and when ETH rose 2.7%, OI only increased 1.7%. This rebound was driven by short covering, not new leverage entering.
ETF funds are still flowing in. On the 28th, Bitcoin ETFs had a net inflow of 137 million, with IBIT alone accounting for 136 million. Ethereum ETFs had a net outflow of 21.4 million, with ETHA losing 44.8 million.
Technically, BTC's 80,000 level is near the 365-day moving average; holding this level is necessary for recovery space.
Let's discuss in the comments: with two dissenting votes at the FOMC, is a December rate hike a done deal? 👇
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 Conclusion first: $NOW dropped from 154 to 121 in 24 hours, with a single 1-hour candlestick falling 17%. But the real story is on OKX—this gap after the US stock market close is the crypto platform settling separately for you.
ServiceNow reported Q3 after the market on 10-28: subscription revenue of $3.988 billion, up 21% year-over-year, total revenue $4.106 billion with an upward revision of the full-year guidance; but adjusted EPS missed by 2 cents, Q4 cRPO growth guidance slowed, after-hours down 15%~19% (company announcement/Yahoo Finance/StockStory).
The wallet: the gap landed at 04:05 CST, the 1H perpetual contract for NOW traded 8,169 contracts, accounting for 42% of the day's 19,350 contracts; open interest only 5,956 contracts (about $730,000). The first 5 funding fees before the earnings were all 0, no one was betting on direction; now +0.045%/8h, perpetual is 0.16% more expensive than the index, shorts got buried in the spike.
Don't confuse this with the crypto market: at the same time $VIRTUAL -4.0%, $RENDER -4.2%, out of 279 perpetual contracts in the whole market, 223 were down, that's a different matter.
Five minutes after the US stock market close, the gap only slammed on OKX, stop losses here will fail. Have you ever been buried?MSTR Earnings Report Exceeds Expectations: I'm Betting Yes (Fully Invested)
Rules: The first earnings report's diluted GAAP EPS rounded strictly above $8.67 means Yes; adjusted EPS does not count. Released after market close on October 29 Eastern Time, 04:00 October 30 Beijing Time.
Logic
• Q3 has ended, BTC rose from about $58,524 on June 30 to about $83,556 on September 30, a full quarter increase of +42.8%.
• Strategy is accounted at fair value; 8-K has forecasted Q3 digital asset gains of about $20.91 billion.
• GAAP EPS is estimated around $17-23, more than double the threshold.
• BTC price changes in October count for Q4, not affecting this settlement.
Don't confuse: $5.82 is adjusted EPS; this bet only considers GAAP.
Risks
• $20.9 billion is an unaudited estimate; official figures may differ.
• Convertible bond dilution and preferred stock dividends will lower EPS, but dropping below $8.67 is very unlikely.
• Delayed release, settlement disputes, and thin order book may cause slippage; limit orders are recommended.
Odds: Yes about $0.84, winning yields about 19%, I estimate a win probability around 95%.
Personal analysis, not investment advice.
$MSTR $xMSTR Ethereum co-founder Mihai Alisie has joined Ethlabs as an anchor investor. At the same time, Kraken's parent company Payward and Gattaca have entered as contributors, with BitMine, Sharplink, and Joseph Lubin already listed among the first anchor investors.
Though brief, this clearly explains Ethereum's funding structure.
First, the people. Alisie is one of Ethereum's earliest members, who managed the ecosystem and community in its early days and has long stayed out of the spotlight. This time, he is not just endorsing but investing. Endorsement builds confidence; investment creates exposure on the balance sheet.
Next, the institutions. Both BitMine and Sharplink treat ETH as a core reserve asset—BitMine hoards coins, while Sharplink has moved its treasury onto Ethereum. Along with ConsenSys founder Lubin, these three appear on the anchor list, which answers half of the question "Who holds ETH long-term?": it's no longer just retail investors and ETFs; a group of companies is structuring their assets around this chain.
For the market, this kind of news doesn't trigger short-term spikes; it provides an explanation for the bottom. Institutions are anchoring themselves to Ethereum with real capital, adding an extra layer of support during downturns.
$ETH pricing still follows the broader market and liquidity, but the tokens are concentrating in the hands of those willing to hold long-term. *🚨 FED JUST POURED COLD WATER ON MARKET*
Rates UNCHANGED but Powell ULTRA hawkish
"NO rush to cut. Wait for inflation to fall."
Rate cut hopes = crushed
Market reaction brutal:
$BTC → $79,710 📉
$ETH → $2,292 📉
Short-term longs REKT
This is NOT shakeout
It's macro shift = Bear control
*PLAN:*
Short $BTC bounce $80.5K-$80.8K → Target $79K
Short $ETH bounce $2,330-$2,350 → Target $2,250
Don't catch falling knife. Rebound = Short opportunity.
#BTC #ETHMy first reaction when I saw this message was: expected cooling VS price drop, don't rush to equate the two. I prefer to treat it as an emotional thermometer rather than a market verdict.
On Polymarket, the YES probability for "Will Bitcoin reach $82,500 in October" is currently 22%, down 34 percentage points in 24 hours, with a trading volume of about $77,097, expected to settle around November 1, 2026. This is the collective probability judgment of bettors on $BTC, not a definite outcome.
My judgment: it has reference value for short-term sentiment but is overreaching to use it to judge long-term direction. The bet is on whether a specific price can be reached before the end of the month, not on long-term value; moreover, the trading volume of a single prediction market cannot directly represent the capital attitude of the entire spot market.
Between watching probability changes VS waiting for spot market confirmation, I lean towards the latter. Would you see this sharp drop as a short-term cooling signal or wait for spot market trends to confirm?$BTC is oscillating around the 80,000 mark. The Federal Reserve's decision to hold steady has actually relieved the bulls, but on the ETF front, Wall Street is pulling back while sovereign funds and Fidelity are stepping in, making the chip turnover more active than the price movement. A more substantial change is happening at the regulatory level: the U.S. stablecoin regulatory framework is entering its final stages, which will have a far more profound impact than candlestick charts.
Today's focus in the A-share market is clear: bank stocks have hit new highs again, with ICBC and CCB acting like stabilizing anchors, but the ChiNext Index plunged 3.6%. Tianfu Communication's earnings missed expectations, causing its stock to drop nearly 20%, while CPO and semiconductor stocks are being suppressed. The money hasn't fled; it has just moved from overvalued areas into places that generate income.
The U.S. stock market after-hours session was even more dramatic. Microsoft had a steady small gain, but $GOOGL plunged nearly 10% after hours due to missing profit targets and increasingly negative free cash flow. On the same day, SK Hynix was still enjoying the windfall from memory chips, with its stock just surging 13%, but after hours, chip stocks collectively gave back gains. The market shows no mercy and only recognizes cash flow.🚨 $SOL has dropped to around $101. Is this the end of the current rally? Don't be quick to write off the bulls! What really deserves attention is that while the price is correcting, Solana's underlying upgrades and ecosystem expansion have not stopped!
📌 First, the core upgrade has been implemented!
On October 21, Solana officially launched the Alpenglow consensus upgrade, aiming to reduce transaction finality time to about 150 milliseconds. For high-frequency trading, on-chain payments, and DeFi, faster confirmation means a better user experience and creates conditions for further application expansion.
📌 Second, the ecosystem is more than just speculation!
In September, Solana's stablecoin supply hit a record of about $17.5 billion, tokenized stock trading volume reached approximately $4.4 billion, and wallets holding tokenized stocks surpassed 1 million. Payments, stablecoins, and traditional assets going on-chain are opening more growth opportunities for SOL.
📌 Third, why is the correction worth watching?
SOL recently fell from around $118 to about $101, which has certainly been tough for many chasing highs. But a price drop does not mean the fundamentals have completely deteriorated. The key is to see if subsequent capital inflows improve, if support at lower levels strengthens, and if any rebound is accompanied by volume. It is important to note that the SOL spot ETF has also seen consecutive net outflows recently, so capital pressure has not fully disappeared.
$ETH $ZEC #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $BTC has returned above $80,000, but the real test is just beginning: after reclaiming the level, can it hold as support on a pullback? Kraken's public quote is about $80,148, with a nearly 24-hour low around $79,615. The quote is above the round number, but a single trade cannot replace a full stabilization process.
I treat $80,000 as an observation line, not an automatic entry point. If the hourly close remains above it, and the next pullback also holds without the low moving lower, I will increase my confidence in the continuation of the recovery. Reclaiming and then holding is different evidence from a brief intraday bounce above.
If the close falls back below and the rebound fails to reclaim, this support judgment fails, and I will stop projecting along the recovery path. The public low below can only serve as a risk reference; it cannot be assumed valid just because there was a rebound there before, nor should relaxed exit conditions be used to justify waiting courageously.
My overall judgment is that the current price offers an opportunity to test the recovery but does not yet provide a trend conclusion. I will not expand risk before confirmation, nor will I write long-term targets without full trigger conditions as project opportunities. Do you value the hourly close above the level more, or the higher low after the pullback? This is purely a personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice.$ETH
Ethereum has a proposal update that plans to have validators register public keys resistant to quantum attacks, as a proactive defense. I think this is meaningful, but to say "Ethereum is already immune to quantum attacks" is a bit of an overstatement. Registering public keys and preparing the entire chain sounds like a lot of work. I'm quite curious, if this really gets used later, how will these validators be replaced now?Samsung's Q3 operating profit hit a record high, but net profit fell short of market expectations. What deserves a closer look is the performance within the group.
The DS division, which includes semiconductors, contributed about 106.5 trillion KRW in operating profit; meanwhile, the DX division, responsible for terminal businesses, recorded an operating loss of about 0.8 trillion KRW. The group's total operating profit was approximately 107.4 trillion KRW, clearly showing a heavy reliance on semiconductors for profitability.
This made me reconsider a question: even though storage prices rose, the impact on businesses selling components versus those selling terminals is different.
The supply side can benefit from price increases, but products like phones and computers face cost pressures. Of course, the DX division's losses need to be analyzed in detail with specific disclosures and cannot be entirely attributed to memory. However, the difference between the two sides of the group is already worth serious attention.
I acknowledge the semiconductor business's achievements. The issue is that the market often expects not only one department to be highly profitable but also improvements in other businesses.
Therefore, record profits and stock price pressure can happen simultaneously. If investors previously expected higher net profits and a more balanced business performance, the final results might be disappointing.
Seeing such large growth figures excites me too. But Samsung reminds me this time that when researching a diversified company, you have to break down each division. A high overall score does not mean every part is satisfactory.
#三星Q3营业利润创新高，净利润不及预期 $GOOGL Google's Q3 earnings missed expectations, plunging sharply after hours...
Google Alphabet's earnings report landed, showing a typical pattern of good news being priced in and bad news causing a sell-off, with shares dropping more than 9% after hours, completely breaking the recent strong momentum of AI giants.
This Q3's overall data was comprehensively weaker than market expectations, with both total revenue and earnings per share falling short. EPS was only $2.12, far below the market expectation of $2.99, becoming the main trigger for the plunge.
Looking at the segmented business, the seemingly impressive cloud business surged 103% year-over-year but couldn't support the overall performance, with the core base clearly weakening.
Google's main revenue drivers, search ads and YouTube ad revenue, both missed expectations. Search business growth noticeably slowed, and the diversion effect of AI on traditional advertising business began to manifest.
Additionally, this quarter revealed a massive $8.66 billion equity investment loss, combined with continued heavy investment in AI infrastructure, capital expenditures hit a new high, directly causing the company to report negative free cash flow for two consecutive quarters.
Compared to neighbor $MSFT Microsoft's AI commercialization performance exceeding expectations, Google is stuck in an awkward predicament:
Betting heavily on AI expansion, but no equivalent profit returns are visible in the short term, with continuous cash burn significantly dragging down profits and cash flow.
The market no longer blindly favors the AI sector. Capital is starting to question the cost-effectiveness of Google's high AI investment, coupled with weak core business growth and investment losses dragging down performance, short-term valuation will inevitably face digestion and adjustment
#谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 Brothers, have you eaten lunch? Did this morning's sharp sell-off confuse a lot of people? Don't rush to catch the dip. I just took a few bites and casually checked the contract data. Wow, the bulls are so stubborn, it's like they're handing money to the main players.
Look at $BTC, currently around 80200. There was a quick dip, but strangely the 4-hour long-short ratio is still 2.23, and open interest remains firm without dropping. This means everyone is betting that 80,000 is the bottom, and when it falls, they frantically add positions. With such a heavy load, how could the main players possibly pump the price easily?
Next, $ETH is currently at 2320, the worst hit. But the most ridiculous thing is the long-short ratio has surged to 3.02! The lower the price drops, the more aggressively retail investors buy. Open interest keeps rising, and above are all trapped positions. This layered leverage is like a mille-feuille; even a slight touch will trigger a chain of liquidations.
Finally, $SOL is at 100.13, having dropped back to the 100 mark. The 4-hour long-short ratio has skyrocketed to an absurd 3.47, and the funding rate is still positive. The bulls are lining up to pay. Once the 99 level is broken, the scene of cascading liquidations will definitely be spectacular.
In summary, the market is extremely weak now, bullish sentiment is too crowded. Don't become fuel for the fire. Control your hands, stay flat, and keep watching.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $PONS $PONS Benefiting from the launch of Robinhood Wallet yesterday, POSN data surged.
Yesterday's daily trading volume was $51.7M, a sharp increase of 47.9% compared to the previous day.
📊 October 27 → 28
• Trading volume: $35M → $52M (+47.9%)
• Platform fees: $355K → $440K (+24.1%)
• Protocol revenue: $54K → $65K (+21.8%)
• Newly launched tokens: 1,452 → 1,938 (+33.5%)
• Number of transactions: 339K → 423K (+24.9%)
• Token holding addresses: 104,470 → 105,194 (+724)
Robinhood Chain's total DEX trading volume also rebounded to $717M (+20.9%), completely recovering from last week's low just above $500M. This time, it's not only PONS warming up, but the entire chain's liquidity is rising. $SOL
🔥 PONS Burn Status
About 127,000 PONS were burned yesterday, with the cumulative burn rate rising to 32.81%. Currently, there is about $288K of funds remaining for repurchase on the chain.
However, a bit of caution is needed, as launch and trading volume fluctuations have always been large, going from $24M to $52M in just three days. $BTC
Let's see if it can hold above $40M for three consecutive days before making further judgments This building's facade was damaged by 8.88% within 24 hours, but the load-bearing structure has no cracks — this is precisely the moment structural engineers like us prefer to step in.
Let's first look at the foundation. The price is now sitting at $0.51, just 0.7% above the short-term Bollinger Band lower boundary. On a short-term scale, it has already sunk to 4% within the lower band range, which is a typical "bottoming and backfilling" phase. The short-term RSI dropped to 28.9, in the oversold zone, indicating the excavator has reached the bearing layer; below that is bedrock. Meanwhile, the long-term RSI remains neutral at 60.6, indicating the upper structure hasn't collapsed, only the vertical load is being released in a short burst — this is a finishing layer issue, not a foundation problem.
Next, looking at the mid-term Bollinger Bands, the price is at the 22nd percentile, with 9.8% clearance to the mid-band lower edge and 31.1% to the upper edge — this is a typical cross-section showing "the podium is complete, but the main tower hasn't started." In other words, the downward settlement space is compressed between 0.7% and 9.8%, while the upward structural clearance has 22% to 31% room to expand. This risk-reward cross-section ratio is exactly the kind of data I use to finalize structural design and construction drawings.
So my blueprint is as follows:
📈 Long:
Entry: 0.48 (5.5% below current price)
Take Profit 1: 0.62 (+22.2%)
Take Profit 2: 0.66 (+31.1%)
Stop Loss: 0.43 (-15.1%)
Please note this entry point — I deliberately set it 5.5% below the current price, waiting for the final "settlement observation." The 8.88% drop in 24 hours is just superficial plaster falling off; the real bottom isn't about scrambling for bricks in the rubble but waiting for the structural inspection report and measurement points to reset before pouring concrete. The $0.48 line is the bearing layer elevation marked on my blueprint; breaking it means foundation failure. The stop loss at 0.43 (-15.1%) is my preset demolition red line — crossing it triggers demolition without mercy.
The first take profit at 0.62 (+22.2%) corresponds to the topping height of the main tower's first standard floor; the second at 0.66 (+31.1%) is the node where the rooftop truss is installed. This growth rate corresponds to the 31.1% structural clearance at the mid-term Bollinger Band upper edge, not a random number but a height derived from the cross-section ratio.
What truly determines whether this building can rise above 0.66 is never the 8.88% crack today, but the construction continuity of the ground-level development team, the foundation's bearing capacity, and the seismic rating of ecological expansion. No matter how beautiful the blueprint, if the load-bearing walls are shoddily built, thirty floors will remain thirty floors and won't reach sixty.
I judge that this building currently only has some water seepage in the underground garage, and the main structure is still standing firm — the short-term oversold RSI of 28.9 combined with the long-term neutral 60.6 is the standard curve for foundation rebound. Once backfilling is complete, the tower crane should start turning.This $BTC position is currently floating with profit, but I'm really anxious about tonight's interest rate meeting and kind of want to just close it out!
Honestly, I think if they really raise rates tonight, it might actually be better for BTC in the short term. Because everyone has already assumed the economy is bad and rates will go up, the market has been slowly declining these past few days to digest that expectation. An actual hike would be a negative finally hitting the market, releasing pent-up emotions, and maybe BTC could rebound next month.
If they don't raise rates, it might seem good, but the market will lack momentum to rally and will be certain rates will rise next month anyway, turning it into a slow, painful decline that keeps wearing people down.
Given the situation tonight, should I exit or hold on tough?$UNI UNI shouting about buyback and burn is purely a show for retail investors.
The splash caused by the burn is not as fast as inflation. The project team has an annual budget to issue 20 million tokens, which means a net increase of 8 million tokens per year.
Pretending to be deflationary on the surface, but inflating behind the scenes.
Now the protocol revenue is also declining, and the circulating tokens in the market are still increasing. It's no wonder this situation looks bad.
#UNI
$UNI
👇$UNI UNI这波喊着回购销毁搞得挺欢，算下账真能把人笑死。
按数据算一年销毁1200万枚，听着挺吓人对吧？结果人家年度预算直接发2000万枚，合着一年还净通胀800万枚。
回购销毁是秀给散户看的面子，疯狂增发才是内部人拿走的里子。买盘全靠项目方拿嘴顶着，等把这层遮羞布撕开，底下全是泡泡。真就当散户数学是体育老师教的。
#UNI
$UNI
👇The resolution is out: interest rates remain unchanged, with the two dissenting votes in the 10 to 2 decision being for a rate hike; the new chair's first speech was very firm— the economy is expanding strongly, financial conditions are tighter, but he refused to use the word "tight." The odds of a rate hike in December rose from 78.3% to 82.6%. At the moment the news broke, Bitcoin surged from 80,600 to 81,027, then was pulled back to around 79,750 during the Asian session three hours later, down 1.6% in 24 hours, with the entire basket down between 1% and 5%. Let's first reconcile the last round of three trades: LINK long opened at 11.62, now 11.48 (-1.25%), neither take profit nor stop loss triggered, this trade failed; TRX long opened at 0.3314, now 0.3311 (-0.10%), almost unchanged; DOGE short opened at 0.07918, now 0.0782, short trade earned 1.12%, hit the mark. One out of three, hit rate 33%. The only correct trade was the one against the crowd— over 70% of accounts were betting on it rising, so it couldn't move up. There's a counterintuitive point: despite hawkish news, risk assets didn't crash, the S&P rose 0.28%, the Nasdaq rose 0.27%. The market isn't afraid of rate hikes, but more afraid of one thing— money having nowhere else to go. The political layer must be explained clearly. The two dissenting votes for rate hikes were not aimed at suppressing inflation, but to reserve their position during the election cycle; after the resolution, it turned into a meetingShorts have just been cleared, but the real danger is that the longs are becoming crowded.
In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidated $259 million, with $156 million in short liquidations and only $103 million in long liquidations—BTC short liquidations were $43.33 million, while longs were just $14.12 million. On the surface, it looks like shorts got heavily crushed. But after the crush, the structure changed.
The proportion of long positions across all market accounts has surged to 65.7%, yet active long trades only account for 55.3%, and on Binance, active long trades are less than half. Accounts are holding longs, but buying pressure is not following through. The funding rate is +0.010%, meaning longs are still paying fees. This indicates many are not optimistic but unwilling to admit they are wrong.
The real focus is not whether 80,000 can hold, but $77,125. According to Coinglass data: if BTC falls below this level, cumulative long liquidations on major CEXs will hit $1.37 billion; if it breaks above $85,010, short liquidations will reach $1.33 billion. The price is currently stuck in the middle, but the lower wick is clearly thicker.
My judgment: this short squeeze has given longs a false sense of security, but the structure holding longs is more fragile than chasing longs. Don’t mistake a rebound for a reversal. If you are fully long now, first ask yourself: if there’s another spike tonight, where is your stop loss? If you can’t answer, your position is driven by emotion, not strategy.
Don’t chase longs, don’t hold positions blindly, wait for the liquidation direction to reveal itself.
Are you holding or waiting now? Let me know in the comments. #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 This is a fraudulent prediction market, which is currently integrated into a competitor's exchange. The most important point is that the result settlement uses the competitor's exclusive spot price for settlement, coordinated with market makers to harvest in the 5m market.