Orbit Post Sitemap
No way, $ETH has crashed back again...
#加密行业协同守护资产安全
babala added a bit more today, now the average price of the ETH long position is at 2276.
The average price looks like it only dropped from 2277 by 1 dollar, but the position size definitely didn’t just increase by 1 dollar.
Now ETH is back near 2220, and my long position is still at an unrealized loss. After the previous low spike down to 2172, there was a rebound, but the price never really held above 2276–2300, indicating this recovery is still weak and the reversal is not yet complete.
What’s even more frustrating is BTC.
BTC is now pressed down near 76,800, very close to the previous low of 76,500. As long as BTC can’t reclaim 78,000, ETH will struggle to rally independently, and any rebound could be suppressed again at any time.
Next, I’m mainly watching a few levels.
2200 is the immediate support for ETH; if it holds here, there’s a chance to rebound and retest 2276 and 2300.
If 2200 breaks again, then the focus shifts back to the low around 2170; if even 2170 doesn’t hold, it might continue to test 2150 below, or even trigger a new round of panic spikes.
On the upside, I’m watching my cost line at 2276 first; only if it climbs back above 2300 can this long position be considered truly recovered; above that is the resistance zone near 2350.
In this black swan drop, babala really added aggressively. 🥇 Gold Is Still Under Pressure as Hynix Open Interest Contracts $XAU 4010.92, down 0.8% over the past 24 hours. Gold continues to trade below its longer-term reference level. 🥇 Based on the latest completed daily candles, the 20-day closing average stands near 4106.41, while the current price is around 4010.92 — roughly 2.3% below that average. Although gold has bounced from its recent low, the recovery remains limited. The price has yet to reclaim its 20-day average, keeping the broader shor$NVDA
This wave of AI sell-off is targeting valuation, having nothing to do with performance. Nvidia closed above $5 trillion yesterday, but opened lower tonight.
Testing OKX's NVDA token around $207, with an intraday low of $206.12, down about 3%. The market cap briefly fell below $5 trillion. It was already falling pre-market and continued to drop at open.
This is not just Nvidia's issue. Intel token dropped from 92 to 65 in 24 hours, nearly a 30% decline; the semiconductor sector collectively plunged, and the three major indexes all opened lower. Whether AI capital expenditure is expensive or not, the market voted with a sell-off tonight.
One figure is quite telling: OKX's NVDA contract open interest is just over $14 million, with zero fees. There isn't much leveraged money betting on it on the exchange, indicating this is selling pressure from the stock itself, not a cascade of forced liquidations. Killing valuation doesn't equal killing logic, but I never catch a falling knife on a gap down; I'll wait until it falls into a divergence.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 #Amazon Q3 revenue slightly misses expectations, AWS growth hits fastest pace in nearly five years
The boss has something to say
Amazon's Q3 earnings report is quite mixed. Total revenue was $201.9 billion, slightly below expectations; but AWS revenue was $45.984 billion, up 39.3% year-over-year, accelerating for the sixth consecutive quarter, marking the fastest growth in nearly five years. After the earnings release, the stock surged 5.55% in after-hours trading.
I believe the reason this earnings report caused a rise is that the "accounting adds up." Although Q3 capital expenditures reached 75.9 billion, and free cash flow outflow over the past 12 months was 42.4 billion, AWS's growth is too strong. As long as the cloud business can maintain this level of acceleration, the market is willing to pay for the burn on AI infrastructure. Compared to Google's plunge due to negative cash flow, Amazon proves that as long as growth is fast enough, the money spent is worth it.
On the market, AMZN rose 5.55%, xAMZN rose 5.60%, showing positive feedback from capital.
The impact on crypto is indirect. Among tech giants, there is differentiation; companies like Amazon with real performance support will continue to attract capital. Bitcoin still lacks external incremental demand.
Bitcoin fell below 80,000 last night, dipping to 78,763, and is still hovering below 80,000. We'll see if it can retake 80,000; if it can't hold, expect deeper corrections. Resistance is between 84,000 and 85,000. Don't chase the rise or sell in panic; set stop-loss orders properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; stop-loss orders must be set properly. Good luck. $BTC $ETH $SOL Tonight (October 30), when watching the market, it might be worth briefly shifting your focus away from the candlestick charts to keep an eye on the votes across the ocean. This midterm election is not only the Republican Party's "midterm exam" but also the biggest political variable for the Federal Reserve's interest rate path and Wall Street's asset allocation over the next two years.##美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 $BTC $ETH $SOL Could hacker-related fund movements be influencing Ethereum's liquidity? One theory is that attackers may be converting stolen assets into ETH because its decentralized nature makes freezing funds more difficult than with certain centralized tokens. However, this remains speculation. A sudden on-chain price spike does not prove that hacker transactions caused it. What's worth watching now: • Large ETH transfers from identified hacker wallets. • Exchange inflows and outflows. • On-chain liquidity$HYPE outperformed $BTC by 3.95 percentage points in the last 24 hours.
My first reaction wasn’t excitement, but to confirm: is this a market rebound, or are a few contracts stealing the spotlight?
① As of now, among the top 5 by 24h trading volume, $HYPE rose -0.11%, closing at 91.3; $BTC -4.06%. The trading volume threshold limits the observation scope, so don’t treat this list as a thermometer for the entire market.
② Leading in gains are $ZEC -3.31%, $BTC -4.06%, $ETH -4.39%. $HYPE’s strength didn’t sync with these assets, appearing more like a local standout rather than a broad rally.
③ $SOL -5.49%, differing from $HYPE by 5.38 percentage points. Such a big gap at both ends of the same observation window means focusing only on the top can overlook volatility at the other end.
My judgment: this is useful for identifying divergence but not enough to confirm an overall rebound. The list provides trading volume but not changes in liquidity, so the quality of the rise is still unclear.
When you look at these gain/loss lists, do you focus most on the percentage change, relative strength to BTC, or changes in trading volume? Let’s discuss in the comments #CryptoCommunity$BTC
77000, it still broke tonight. OKX tested a low of 76472, yesterday at this time it was still above 80200, dropping more than four points in one day; Binance's figures match, with a low of 76444.
I've been calling bearish for a few days, nothing new. What's new is another number: mining difficulty surged 5.54% at once tonight, reaching a historic high of 148.36T. Price breaks down, but hashrate pushes up, one of these two must be wrong. For now, I trust the miners' investment, but I'm also prepared—miners who can't hold on will drop out first, and the hashrate will drop back in the next cycle.
Buying pressure has also softened. Today, the net inflow of the US Bitcoin ETF is only 395 coins, equivalent to about thirty million dollars, while a few days ago it was over a hundred million; the Ethereum ETF even saw an outflow of nearly 28,000 coins. Another detail: the batch of BTC held by hackers is now worth around 1.4 billion dollars, more than what Coinbase itself holds.
A few days ago, I wrote that there was a thick pile below 78000, but I didn't test how thick, it first dropped to 76400. I'm used to being proven wrong, so don't ask me where the bottom is this time, I'm still looking myself.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 Not so fast. A rate pause does not automatically mean a bullish market. The market already expects the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates unchanged. That means the decision itself may already be priced in. The real catalyst will be the Fed's tone, inflation outlook, and signals about December's policy direction. 1. BTC – $80,000 is the key level Bitcoin needs to maintain strength above $80,000 to support its recovery. A hawkish Fed message could trigger another rejection, while a softer toneBitcoin's reaction to the macro environment is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.
Strong economic growth alongside persistent inflation gives the Fed very little reason to rush into rate cuts.
That keeps financial conditions tight and puts pressure on risk assets, especially when market positioning is already vulnerable. $BTC The reported exchange security incident has intensified panic, but there is an important distinction: an exchange bailout can protect customer confidence without immediately restoring market liquidity or eliminating selling pressure. 1. Exchange security and market impact Reports indicate that approximately $5.87 billion in assets were involved, with around $3 billion reportedly frozen. A significant portion of the stolen tokens was reportedly converted into ETH. These figures and the alleged 18Google Cloud is entering the cryptocurrency custody space with a new service that allows banks to split and store crypto keys across multiple cloud providers, ensuring that no single entity, including Google, holds the complete key. The product is planned for full release in early 2027 and aims to meet the stringent security and regulatory requirements financial institutions face when entering the digital asset space. How it works The service uses multiparty computation (MPC) or threshold cryptography technology to split private keys into multiple shares. Banks can keep one share on their own hardware while distributing other shares across different cloud environments. This approach eliminates single points of failure and reduces the risk of insider threats or external attacks. By allowing banks to retain key shares locally, Google addresses a major concern of regulators and financial firms: the fear of handing over full control to third-party cloud providers. Industry impact Google's move marks an increasing convergence between traditional finance and crypto infrastructure. As institutional demand for digital assets rises, banks are seeking secure and compliant custody solutions. Google's entry may intensify competition among cloud providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure, which are also expanding their blockchain offerings. Additionally, it could accelerate traditional banks' adoption of crypto services, as they can now leverage Google's infrastructure while maintaining control over their keys. However, challenges remain. Regulatory clarity around crypto custody is still evolving, and banks need to ensure Google's service complies with theA bailout can restore confidence in an exchange, but it cannot automatically eliminate selling pressure or reverse market sentiment. The biggest danger right now is assuming that the worst is over and rushing into leveraged long positions. Three things deserve attention: 1. Exchange bailout doesn't mean market bottom. Freezing suspicious funds and compensating affected users can reduce panic, but it doesn't guarantee that all stolen assets have been recovered or that selling pressure has disappeOptions expiration does not mean the market will reverse
134,000 $BTC options expire, with a notional value of $10.48 billion.
The max pain point is $78,000, with a put-call ratio of 0.53.
How this number is calculated: put contracts only account for one-third.
The remaining two-thirds are betting on a rise.
Common misunderstanding: max pain is not a predicted price.
It is the price at expiration that causes the most contracts to expire worthless.
Market makers' hedging positions tend to cluster around that point.
So the price tends to hover near it, not be pulled by it.
Writing this in detail, but most likely no one will read it all.
#VanEck与富兰克林推出含BTC配置的新型ETF $BTC Some people took advantage of Binance being hacked and made a fortune on-chain.
Hackers, fearing their stolen U would be frozen, frantically swapped it for ETH on-chain.
However, Binance suspended withdrawals, so the cheap ETH inside the exchange couldn't be moved out, causing ETH prices on Uniswap to spike by 10% to 30%. Meanwhile, Aave's price followed the exchange price.
Then came the clever move:
Deposit U on Aave, borrow ETH at a low price,
Sell ETH at a high price on Uniswap to get U,
Repeat, repeat, and repeat.
When the ETH price fell back, buy it all back and repay.
The player who profited the most from this operation entered the market 24 minutes after the incident and made a huge profit of 3.47 million USD.I watched the hottest news tonight twice: over 1.5 billion U liquidated in 24 hours, and long positions worth 356 million were liquidated in the surge past 80,000. $BTC current price is 77,292, down 3.53%, with a daytime high of 81,970 and a low of 76,519. $ETH is at 2,230, down 4.13%, $SOL at 96.63, down 4.00%, none escaped.
Honestly, this drop is justified; leverage is squeezed, and breaking key levels triggers chain liquidations. The ridiculous part is the fees: this afternoon ETH and SOL even went negative, but by evening they all flipped back positive, BTC at 0.01%, SOL at 0.0092%. Longs start paying interest again, yet the price still hovers at 77,292, with open interest at 33,333 coins, over 300 more than this afternoon, showing weak conviction.
What does this mean for positions? I only watch two lines: from tonight to tomorrow morning, if $BTC closes above 79,709 on the four-hour chart, the bearish view is invalidated, and we acknowledge that at tomorrow’s open; if it breaks below 76,519, the low is not the bottom. If SOL doesn’t reclaim 100, I won’t consider it recovered yet. The data is freshly pulled public data tonight, not live trading.
Tonight, which side do you choose? Watch the show, or do you think around 76,519 it’s already time to start watching slowly? #加密行业协同守护资产安全 Intel dropped more than 20% in a single day today, marking its worst day since 1974, with over $100 billion in market value evaporated in one day.
The funny thing is that the Q3 earnings report was actually very strong, with data center and AI revenue growing 78% year-over-year, the fastest growth in 15 years.
The problem lies in the Q4 guidance. Revenue is only projected at $15 to $16 billion, while the market expected $17 billion. EPS is given as 0.25, with the market expecting 0.43.
The reason is ironic. AI data centers have depleted memory supplies, causing memory prices to skyrocket, forcing PC manufacturers to cut inventory. Intel estimates the PC market will decline 12% this year and another 10% next year, with analysts calculating that Q4 PC shipments imply an approximate 45% year-over-year drop.
Server CPU demand is very strong, but Intel’s production capacity can’t keep up. The Israel Fab 28 experienced an explosion in mid-month, halting production for two weeks, resulting in about $300 million less revenue in Q4.
AI is both helping and hurting Intel. The stock, which nearly tripled in the first half of this year, faces a brutal correction once expectations fall short.
#英特爾Q4業績指引低於預期，股價大跌 The monthly chart is facing a close, with ETH struggling around $2,230, having once dropped to $2,180 during the day, hitting a two-month low. But today’s market saw an unexpected surge of buying pressure.
Binance suffered the largest hacker attack in its history. Before the freeze took effect, the attacker threw hundreds of millions of dollars worth of stablecoins into Uniswap and other DEXs, frantically swapping them for ETH. Since Ethereum has no issuer who can freeze tokens with one click, this created a mechanical, price-agnostic buying pressure. The shorts had $1.091 billion in liquidation exposure stacked above $2,340, which became the fuel for a short squeeze. As expected, the bulls are always crazy.
But don’t misread this buying pressure as a trend reversal. The hacker still holds over 200,000 ETH, which is a looming supply sword for the future. The real factors suppressing the price have not eased: ETF net outflows in October ranged from $1.225 billion to $1.35 billion; the Fed’s “hawkish pause” is in place; although the probability of a rate hike in December has marginally dropped from 84% to 75%, two dissenting votes against a hike indicate the committee’s decreasing tolerance for inflation. The lower Bollinger Band at $2,289 has already been broken, with the price running along the lower band, and the 200-day SMA at $2,160 is a deeper anchor.
$2,340 is the first test of the quality of this short squeeze; if it can’t break through, the hacker’s buying is just a pulse. If $2,160 is lost, October will end in the worst way. The monthly close is approaching, and the direction is still undecided.#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高
Macroeconomic pressure remains unresolved, with compliance breakthroughs and security alarms running in parallel
The narrative of sustained high interest rates has regained dominance, with the strengthening dollar and U.S. Treasury yields directly suppressing risk assets. BTC fell 1.48%, ETH fell 1.57%, and altcoins face greater pressure amid tightening liquidity.
However, structural changes in the industry have not stopped. OKX, ICE (parent company of NYSE), and Trade.xyz have teamed up to introduce 24/7 perpetual contracts based on Hyperliquid into the regulated U.S. market. ICE will serve as the operator and clearing party, while OKX will handle retail distribution through a joint venture FCM. Essentially, this is a "compliance incorporation" of traditional financial infrastructure into on-chain perpetual liquidity—perpetual contracts have an annual trading volume exceeding $90 trillion, accounting for three-quarters of crypto derivatives, yet have long operated outside U.S. regulation. With the compliance channel opening, liquidity constrained by regulatory compliance, such as hedge funds and market makers, is expected to enter.
Meanwhile, security alarms continue to sound. Upbit had approximately $30.43 million in Solana assets stolen, Balancer lost over $116 million due to contract vulnerabilities, and Garden Finance suffered another $5.5 million attack. The flip side of introducing institutional flow through compliance is that the security foundation must be upgraded simultaneously—without hard constraints on custody and contract security, compliance benefits will only be diluted by illicit actors.
Interest rate hikes suppress short-term valuations, compliance reshapes long-term structure, and security determines the survival baselineJust got liquidated, Big Bro Maji topped up with 250,000 U to go long again, and this time he might really get results!
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高
Due to the Binance hack incident causing a drop, Big Bro Maji's ETH long positions on Hyperliquid were all forcibly liquidated this morning, exploding 8 times within 6 hours, with his account balance dropping to just $1.5 at one point.
But unexpectedly, he topped up another 250,000 USDC to go long this afternoon. The liquidation price for the ETH position is around $2161, with leverage still relatively high.
Big Bro is still Big Bro, but this time I think he might be able to get results.
My basis:
1. High leverage liquidations are often followed by short-term oversold rebounds;
2. The drop was event-driven rather than due to fundamental deterioration. As the core asset of DeFi, ETH tends to rebound first after liquidity recovers.
3. The liquidation line is close, so risk remains high. But if ETH does not break below 2160 and rebounds with volume, there is a chance to realize results this time.
ETH outlook:
In the short term, $ETH has fallen from a high to around 2200, with panic selling pressure basically released.
The Binance incident was a one-time shock, not a systemic risk. Binance has promised full coverage and frozen about 3 billion, so sentiment is expected to gradually recover.
Technically, RSI has entered the oversold zone, with strong support around 2160-2200. If it can stabilize here, the probability of a rebound to 2300-2350 is not low.I use data from crypto prediction markets as a reference, but I first need to clearly understand what exactly they're asking. When watching Bitcoin, focusing on the price makes it easy to get caught up; prediction markets require paying attention to the deadline and how the results are calculated. Odds can show which side the funds inside the market favor, but since few people participate, the reference value should be discounted. Sometimes I see a result that seems well accepted, but when I check the rules, I find it asks about touching a price, while I was thinking about holding above it—got excited for nothing.#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 Intel really "won the earnings report but lost the stock price" that night.
Last night's earnings: revenue of $16.5 billion, up 21%, earnings per share $0.52, all better than expected. Data center and AI business rose 78% to $7.3 billion. Logically, this is good news.
But once the guidance came out, it was immediately crushed. Q4 revenue guidance is $15 to $16 billion, Wall Street expected $17 billion. EPS guidance is $0.25, expected $0.43. Plus a weak PC market and an explosion at the Israel factory, impacting about $600 million, spread over two quarters. After-hours it dropped more than 20% at one point.
Now the price is $68.31, down nearly 26% from yesterday's close near $92, a gap down overnight. The low hit $67.06.
Last week I was still writing about it dropping from $95 to $89, complaining "the trend is getting worse," and now looking back, that was just a drizzle.
The most heartbreaking part is, this company had risen 150% before this year, and a month ago it had already dropped 20%, the market was already worried about AI spending. Now comes another blow.
I don't hold it, just watching, but watching makes me feel cold inside.
Do you have Intel? Is it the stock, or just holding the token?
#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 $INTC > Tonight: 2:00 AM decision, 2:30 AM reaction 👀
> $BTC real move starts at Powell presser
> Hike 7% = pause certain. Key is tone:
> Pause = comma -> risk pressured
> Pause = downplay path -> marginal bullish
> Market: >70% pricing Dec hike
> Watch dissents: 2-3 hawkish = shaky pause, 0 = clean pause
> Flow: spot buying, retail holding
#StrategyQ3ProfitSurges #Resilient assets do not equal safe opportunities
The market generally believes that after a black swan event, a recovery rally will follow, and many are watching HYPE, ready to enter on a pullback.
A 3.1% PCE increase raises rate hike expectations, and compliance cooperation news from OKX and ICE is easily taken as ongoing positive momentum.
The premise for this type of resilient asset to strengthen is that macro risk appetite remains stable.
If US Treasury yields break upward, the logic behind strong assets like HYPE will be quickly disproven.
Open your position list and check the stop-loss levels for your HYPE and ETH orders.
Does your stop-loss take changes in macro expectations into account?
$ETH $ZEC $BTC $XRP I'll be straightforward, the XRP chart is making my blood pressure spike. Outside it's quiet, but inside the market it's dog-eat-dog; the 1.2367 level was forcibly pulled up. Damn it, the dog traders are holding their sickles high, huh? 🤡
Purely a hard pull by capital, volume can't keep up, a typical bull trap shakeout. There's dense resistance above, a short-term spike is just handing food to the bears. At the 1.2367 line, I directly entered a short position, stop loss at 1.2650, target first at 1.18, if broken then 1.15.
Don't get carried away with your position size, scale in gradually. Whether you follow or not, risk is on you.
👇👇👇The current market situation is like placing an order on Taobao, with the logistics status showing "Picked up," but no updates for three days—you ask customer service, and they say, "Dear, it's on the way"; you ask again, and they say, "Dear, it might be lost, we suggest a refund."
BTC's "Picked up" means ETFs have had a net inflow of $424 million over three consecutive days, with $137 million in a single day on the 29th, showing the goods are moving. The "no updates for three days" means the price was hammered from above 80,000 down to 77,012; ETFs came in, but the price didn't follow. The "might be lost" refers to about $3.2 billion worth of BTC and ETH from the hacker incident that have not yet been frozen; customer service (Binance) says they will fully compensate, but they haven't specified whether it's compensation in goods or money. ETH at 2,253, with logistics status "Returned," ETFs had a single-day outflow of 21.11 million; the goods not only didn't arrive but are going back. SOL around 97, logistics status "Package damaged," has fallen more than anyone else.
The most frustrating thing about express delivery is that you know it might be lost, but the refund button is right there; you clicked it three times and canceled twice. Are you now waiting for delivery, or have you already applied for a refund? SOL is directly liquidated $BTC $ETH $SOL JPMorgan doesn't dare to buy Bitcoin.
They think its price is too unstable.
How unstable? There's a number to measure it, called volatility.
Simply put, it's how much the price can swing up and down in a day.
They use it to calculate risk, and for Bitcoin, it's a 55% annual swing.
But current measurements show 25.2%, less than half of what they thought.
Since 2015, only 5 days have been quieter than now.
The quieter it is, the more big money dares to enter.
Wall Street isn't complaining about earning just 10% a year.
It's that internally they have a chart with the number 55% on it.
The higher the risk estimated on the chart, the less they allow buying.
In every bear market, Bitcoin falls from its peak.
How much it falls: 84%, 77%, this time 54%.
Each drop is shallower than the last.
It's very certain the bottom is at 60,000, not 40,000.
But there's a group of people holding on above.
Those who bought between 85,000 and 118,000 have costs around 100,000.
They want to sell as soon as they break even, so 100,000 is the toughest barrier.
Once this group leaves, the price will have strength to go up.
We don't need to guess when it will rise.
Long term, watch two things: whether it breaks 100,000, and whether daily swings are still severe.
Before this wave, I said 75,800 is still valid.If the parent company of the NYSE really brings perpetual contracts to the forefront, then this $HYPE movement is worth re-examining from a derivatives perspective. What exactly are the whales scrambling for? When I saw the on-chain data, I was stunned for a moment: within half an hour of the news, 12 new positions were directly opened, 9 long and 3 short, with a long-to-short ratio of 3.64 to 1. One of the trades was over $12 million at an average price of $82.47. This price level is almost at the spot price, not chasing highs, but more like betting on a window before a breakout. ✨ But from a derivatives perspective, what really needs to be watched is not the number of positions, but the rhythm and leverage structure of these people's position building. Concentrated long openings driven by news often imply two things simultaneously: first, they expect the perpetual contract narrative to bring real buying pressure; second, these positions themselves become fuel for subsequent volatility. If the price quickly pulls away from the $83 area, short squeezes will amplify the rise; but once the narrative cools down, this same batch of high-leverage longs will also become the most vulnerable source of stop-losses. The bullish logic lies in the fact that the compliance background of the NYSE parent company adds a layer of legitimacy to the perpetual contract sector. HYPE, as a direct beneficiary, easily attracts momentum traders and market makers to deepen bid-ask spreads. But the risk signals are also clear: if the funding rate quickly turns positive or rises during the rally, it indicates increasing crowding among longs, and continuous new narratives will be needed to absorb this. At the altcoin level, this kind of news usually first ignites a single token, then tentatively spills over to the perp DEX sector, with a fast and short rhythm, not really like a broad risk appetite recovery. My own understanding is #USCorePCERisesTo3.1% ⚠️ Inflation rebounds, liquidity expectations tighten again! The rebounds of BTC and ETH may not have reached a safe zone yet.
The US core PCE rose to 3.1% in September, with overall PCE reaching 3.6%, and market concerns about a 25 basis point rate hike by the Federal Reserve in December continue to intensify.
What really deserves caution in this market is not just the price decline, but the macro environment changing the risk appetite of funds.
📉 Market pressure is showing:
BTC fell below $79,000, short-term structure weakening.
ETH followed with a decline of over 3%.
170,000 liquidations occurred in 24 hours, leveraged funds under significant pressure.
High interest rate expectations persist, meaning the market may face prolonged liquidity pressure. Both the Nasdaq and crypto assets find it difficult to completely escape this macro impact.
I am currently not rushing to treat a rebound as a trend reversal. The next focus is on three signals:
Whether the Fed rate hike expectations continue to rise.
Whether stablecoin supply grows again.
Whether RWA capital inflows can continue to improve.
If the funding situation does not truly improve, short-term rallies still need to be treated cautiously. When strong assets pull back, we must wait for confirmation from capital flows and price structure, rather than blindly bottom-fishing.
My approach: control risk first, then wait for the trend. The market is not short of opportunities, but patience. $SPY, strong GDP but slowing consumption, which signal does the index price in? The US Q3 GDP annualized growth is 3.4%, but September's real consumer spending is basically flat, inflation remains high, showing a divergence between growth and purchasing power signals. Whether corporate earnings can continue and whether interest rates will keep limiting valuations will determine the breadth of the market. If earnings expectations are revised upward and the rise spreads to more sectors, the index's strength will be healthier; if the index relies on a few heavyweight stocks and yields rise again, the risk of a pullback will increase.#StrategyQ3净利润创单季新高，数字资产收益贡献显著 US Core PCE Inflation Rises to 3.1%, Fed December Rate Hike Expectations Continue to Heat Up
US Inflation Data Meets Expectations, Market Closely Watches Fed's Next Move
Both Core PCE and Overall Inflation Rise, How Will the Dollar and Gold Markets React?
Divergence Emerges Within the Fed, Market Focuses on December Monetary Policy Direction
US Inflation Pressure Persists, Global Financial Markets Face New Challenges
Probability of December Rate Hike Surpasses 80%, Fed Policy Shift Draws Attention
What Changes Will Bitcoin, Gold, and US Stock Markets See After US PCE Data Release?
Recommended Title
US Core PCE Rises to 3.1%, Fed December Rate Hike Expectations Heat Up, Where Are Gold and Cryptocurrency Markets Headed? #USTreasuryYieldHigh Core Risk Warnings
1. $76,423 (200-day EMA) is the "judgment line" for the mid-term structure: Intraday testing near $76,500 has occurred; a sustained close below this will open the path toward $73,566. This is currently the only structurally significant level.
2. The 85% probability of a rate hike in December is the fundamental reason for continued declines even after a "no hike" outcome: The market is pricing not a pause in October, but a possible restart in December. The suppressive effect of a "hawkish pause" is harder to digest than a single rate hike.
3. The structure where ETF buying is overwhelmed by leveraged liquidations remains unchanged: $423.7 million inflows vs. $1.23 billion long liquidations; the marginal ETF buying cannot counteract the selling pressure caused by leveraged liquidations. ETF inflows alone are insufficient to reverse the weak market structure.
4. The rise in open interest (OI) against the trend is "fuel with unclear direction": Price is falling while OI increases by 5.38%, indicating new positions are being established, but their long/short nature is unknown. Once direction becomes clear, forced liquidations of these new positions could amplify volatility.
5. Extremely shallow near-term liquidity magnifies shocks: Sell orders at $78,094 account for 69.8% of the top five order levels; limited market impact can trigger sharp price drops. Weekend liquidity $BTC $ETH $SOL #StrategyQ3净利润创单季新高，数字资产收益贡献显著 Today's 24-hour liquidation overview!
Total 1.54 billion! Long positions 1.28 billion, short positions 250 million! Mainly long positions liquidated!
On-chain expert Majhi's positions all liquidated, balance reset to zero!
Liquidations also concentrated in the early morning hours, bn's stolen huge funds triggered the entire market!
The market was doing well last night, but suddenly impacted by a black swan event, causing a sharp downturn!
$BTC dropped to around 76,500 at its lowest. After Bn was hacked, bearish on the market outlook, the diamond-handed whale who held long positions in $BTC and $ETH for nearly 4 months just closed his long positions worth 100 million USD, pocketing a profit of 17.78 million USD, then immediately opened a short position of 20,000 ETH!
In early July, he went long 1,000 BTC at a price of 62,353 and long over 10,000 ETH at 1,762.
After holding for nearly 4 months, influenced by today's hack and bearish on the market outlook, he closed all his long positions, pocketing a profit of 17.78 million USD.
Then he opened a short position of 20,000 ETH at a price of 2,228 (worth 44.6 million USD) #Can Coinbase's alliance with Deribit improve revenue in Q3? ⚡Clear division of labor in the market! BTC and others await earnings reports, ENA earns interest, BICO is directly pulled up by funds
$BTC｜81511 📊
The market is closely watching Strategy's earnings report, focusing on its BTC holdings' unrealized gains. After a week of repeated oscillations around 80000, a rebound arrives. PCE is just a prelude; the real show is tomorrow's earnings report, with both institutions and retail investors waiting for direction.
$ENA｜0.21129 💵
Surged 7.69%, relying on USDe-collateralized US Treasury interest earnings, with yields tied to the US dollar interest rate. The environment of rising rate expectations actually benefits it; the longer high interest rates persist, the more attractive this type of interest-bearing stablecoin sector becomes.
$BICO 🚀
Single-day increase of 9.72%, with a trading volume of 12.08 million, focusing on a mnemonic-free on-chain account solution. The sector logic is sound, but it has always lacked breakout applications. Whether this big bullish candle is purely a fund-driven pump or the start of application adoption still needs ongoing verification.
$ASTER｜0.7176 🛰️
Slight rise of 1.93%, a multi-chain perpetual contract DEX. Trading volume is only 690,000, with light chips, passively following the market rebound. Currently, all capital attention is on BTC earnings reports, and there is no independent catalyst or new sector attracting interest for now. $NEAR This operation is really laughable.
Issuing 13 million USD worth of tokens in a single month, but the buyback is only 1.9 million.
The most ridiculous part is that the bought-back tokens are not burned; they are directly retained without being destroyed.
It's purely like scooping water with a leaking ladle.
The secondary market is constantly hammered by net inflation every day, leaving all the selling pressure to retail investors. How can this market rise?
#NEAR
$NEAR
👇$ETH ETH plunged sharply today to 2,245, down over 3% for the day, with the fear index only at 30. The key August support at 2,220 has been effectively broken, opening downside space for the bears.
Key levels:
Resistance above: 2,242 (short-term bull-bear dividing line) → 2,300 (psychological barrier) → 2,355 (200-day EMA, a recovery above this can signal a reversal) Support below: 2,176 (today's low) → 2,160 (200-day moving average, ultimate defense line) → 1,820 (extreme low in August, target after breaking $2,160)
Core logic:
ETF net outflows have continued for four consecutive weeks, totaling over $484 million, indicating clear institutional withdrawal; the Fed's hawkish stance combined with PCE inflation exceeding expectations further delays rate cut expectations; Glamsterdam upgrade indefinitely postponed, ETH lacks short-term independent catalysts for a rally. RSI has dropped to 38.9 in the weak zone, price is fully trading below SMA20/SMA50, technicals are under extreme pressure.
Trading approach:
The bearish trend remains unchanged, do not bottom-fish lightly. Watch if 2,160-2,176 can stabilize and form a base; if volume supports a firm hold above 2,242, cautiously try a long position targeting a rebound near 2,300. Breaking below 2,160 calls for caution of accelerated probing down to $1,820. Keep positions light, apply strict stop-loss, and add only when the trend becomes clear. $BTC #加密行业协同守护资产安全 $ICP
Building applications directly on blockchain infrastructure is an ambitious idea. $ICP explores this direction with its internet computer technology. What interests me most is the possibility of reducing dependence on traditional centralized infrastructure. The next important step is attracting developers and creating applications that ordinary people actuCrowding signals on the liquidation chart
BTC current price 77,378, pain point for longs below at 76,945, only 0.56% apart. This is not an ordinary distance but a sensitive zone where a single wick could trigger liquidations. More worrisome is that BNB longs below account for as high as 95%, and ZEC also at 80%, showing an unusually crowded long position.
On the other hand, crude oil is biased upwards by 97%, ETH slightly biased upwards, forming a contrast with the long accumulation in mainstream coins. The entire market, except for safe-haven assets, is almost filled with long positions. Crowding itself is not a direction but a risk: when positions are overly concentrated, volatility often sweeps toward the pain points first.
At this moment, the worst is to turn "bullish" into "holding through pain." The liquidation chart does not warn of an immediate reversal but that the odds have worsened. Watch more, act less, and wait for the crowding to release before making judgments; this is more cost-effective than stubbornly holding at the tip of the needle.
(This is not investment advice)
$BTC $ETH $ZEC
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 $CAP I can responsibly tell you that today is a distribution day.
It pulled up by more than ten points at the highest, but the positions didn't increase much. Basically, it was dominated by closing short positions on the domestic market, with some long positions dragged up. After the pull-up, the drop was also quick, indicating that the funds do not recognize the price level above.
This rally did not involve new large capital inflows at all. At this point, if it rallies, there are two possibilities: closing profitable short positions and adding some long positions to maximize profits by distributing the long positions above.
It was hammered like this a few days ago, thinking to help the funds above to break even in the short term and increase selling pressure for themselves. Even if the dealer sells low, they still profit and it's stable. I also saw 0.1, which can be said to be an absolutely critical level. If positions surge and pull up from there, I will definitely go all in.
Don't blindly trust coins you've made money on, and don't purely gamble on coins you've lost money on. Analyze and be rational. 🚨BTC breaks down! ZEC approaches the previous low of 1230, don't bet on a V-shaped rebound in the US stock market!
Brothers, the market really crashed! BTC plunged all the way down to 77114 (-5.66%), ZEC sharply dropped nearly 9%, now priced at 1236! The deep V-shaped rebound this afternoon was just a bait, now the second bottom test officially begins!
📊 Market highlights:
1. ZEC's 1235 previous low support line is being fiercely tested, BTC breaking down at any time could trigger further cascading liquidations in the crypto space.
2. Don't guess "gap down then rally," in such one-sided panic sell-offs, catching the falling knife is extremely risky and likely to get stuck halfway.
🛡️ Veteran trader strategy:
⚠️ Keep a close eye on the 1230 support. If it breaks decisively, look directly down to the 1190 liquidation zone. Wait for a heavy volume long lower shadow candle near 1190, then cautiously try going long with a very light position. If it can regain volume and hold above 1250, then confirm long on the right side.
🍻 Take the advice: Tonight, gamblers going all-in with high leverage are destined for a sleepless night. Turn off the software, go have a late-night snack and drink some cold beer! Let the big players fight it out themselves!
⚠️ For reference only, not investment advice. In extreme market conditions, survival comes first! #美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #加密行业协同守护资产安全 $BTC $ZEC $JUP
A good trading experience depends on more than attractive prices. $JUP is connected to the Jupiter ecosystem, which brings useful trading tools to Solana users. I find the development of decentralized trading platforms particularly interesting. Better user experiences could help DeFi reach people who are new to cryptTo be honest, my first reaction isn't to guess the direction, but to think about how long this position can hold. I used to think that just picking the right direction was enough, but after suffering losses from tough holds, I realized that if the position size is too large, you might never get to see your judgment pay off.
This time, Core Trader 19 went long on $GOOGL with 20x leverage, with a nominal position of about $204,500. I think the key isn't whether you dare to go long, but how you retreat if you're wrong: roughly calculating by nominal value, if the price moves 1% against you, the unrealized loss is about $2,045; 20x leverage also compresses the margin for error. Just looking at this position alone, without knowing the total wallet funds and other hedges, you can't directly judge if it's a heavy position.
I now stick to two rules: first, decide how much you can afford to lose on a single trade, then work backward to determine position size; before opening a position, set a stop loss and don't move it toward the liquidation line. Staying alive is more important than proving you're right. Have you ever had a situation where you were right about the direction but got squeezed out by leverage? Would you be willing to share a rule you later stuck to?$ONDO
Tokenization could change how people access traditional financial assets. $ONDO is one project bringing this concept into the blockchain space. Its real challenge is building trust, accessibility, and useful financial products. I believe this sector deserves serious attention beyond short-term market movements.Binance: I will cover the losses. BTC: I won't move. Hacker: Thanks
A short internet joke that precisely summarizes the current three-way standoff in this coin theft incident. Binance has clearly stated externally that all losses will be covered by the SAFU security fund combined with the platform's own funds, so user assets will not suffer losses, directly stabilizing the market's biggest fear of a run. On-chain data shows that the stolen 18,000 BTC have quietly remained in the hacker's address without being transferred out, which is exactly what the joke means by "BTC: I won't move." The hacker has not rushed to sell, fully understanding BTC's decentralized underlying characteristic: BTC has no on-chain freeze switch, and as long as the private key is held, the timing of selling is completely controlled by the holder. Currently, market sentiment is fragile, and rashly dumping large amounts could trigger intense tracking from all sides; choosing to lie low and wait for the market to recover and liquidity to improve before gradually breaking up and cashing out offers greater operational flexibility, hence the hacker's sarcastic "Thanks" ending. The stablecoin portion has already recovered most losses through issuer freezes, greatly clearing risks, but this dormant BTC remains a potential selling pressure looming over the market. Even if Binance completes the coverage, the secondary market still needs to continuously price in the risk of the hacker selling in the future. Essentially, this is the dilemma of decentralized assets: the platform can cover users' book losses but cannot create the authority to freeze assets on the Bitcoin network; the hacker holds the initiative on the timing of selling. In summary: Binance solved the users' loss problem but cannot solve the risk of the hacker cashing out BTC at any time, with the timing initiative in the hacker's hands > $BTC | ∼$77000 dip — reclaim, 1H vol drying up
> After surging last night, price steadily declining. 1H EMA20/50/100 aligned down bearish. Price running below down-turning EMA20, rebounds failed to reach MAs. 1H candles consecutively bearish, short-term MAs suppressing from above.
> Just now price dipped near $77K, moment of concern. But subsequent 15m formed bullish engulfing and closed back up. 1H volume shrunk from >100K in morning to <20K. Bears down along MAs.
#StrategyQ3ProfitSurges Binance incident: ETH opened in Beijing at about 2370, dropped to about 2174, then bounced back to about 2223. OI is pulling out; I'll treat this rebound as a pressure release.
According to CoinDesk and CNBC, after Binance's hot wallet security incident involving about 6.3 billion, the whole network liquidated over 1.5 billion, with ETH itself liquidating about 360 million. Bulls bore about 80% of the losses.
CoinDesk also reported that ETH's open interest dropped about 5.8%, a steeper decline than the price, indicating funds are flowing out; on the options side, the November 13th 2000 strike put volume remains high.
OKX current price is about 2223, Beijing open about 2370, 24h high about 2379, low about 2174.
Leverage has been partially released, but that doesn't mean the fundamentals suddenly improved. Before withdrawals resume and compensation is settled, don't take these jumps as buy signals.
First, see if the 2170–2200 range can hold; only after reclaiming 2320–2370 should we reconsider. A 4H close below about 2174 means panic hasn't fully subsided.
Do you think ETH's next move will be to stabilize above 2200, or will it need to test below 2170 again?
##加密行业协同守护资产安全
$ETHData as of 21:30. Regarding the $6.3 billion theft, looking back after 24 hours, there has been progress in asset recovery, but the bad news hasn't stopped: two stablecoin issuers have frozen about $2.4 billion in on-chain funds, and the platform itself reported new points of intrusion—exact words were "more points of breach"—deposits and withdrawals remain under security review. The price response is straightforward: Bitcoin has dropped from 78,000 to below 77,000, hitting a low of 77,085; about 80% of the forced liquidations worth over a billion dollars in 24 hours were longs, and the platform token once fell by 8%. I've seen this scenario a few times. In August 2016, when 120,000 bitcoins were stolen, the price dropped 20% that month but recovered by year-end; in May 2019, when 7,000 bitcoins were stolen, the price crash lasted only three days and doubled within two months. Both times, money was stolen, not lost from the books. The November 2022 incident was different—insolvency with a bottomless balance sheet, and the price never recovered. This time, unlike 2016, the freezing was quick—$2.4 billion frozen in three days, whereas back then it took law enforcement eight years to recover most of it; similarly, the stolen funds were never the main price driver—whether funds can be withdrawn or not is the key issue. Washington extended another hand the same week. On October 28, the interest rate decision was 10 to 2 to hold at 3.75%–4.00%, with two voting for a rate hike and one for another increase in December