Orbit Post Sitemap
#CFTC first approves US single-stock perpetual futures Analyst target price spread 7 times, where is the core anchor point of Circle's financial report?
Many people use revenue growth rate to price, which is a common misinterpretation. The full-year revenue forecast is raised by 10%, but the EPS forecast falls to 1.15, directly halving from last year's 2.35, with institutional disagreement stuck on the profit side.
The financial report will be released in 12 hours, with a 52-week high of 140, and the current price has already [Uncle's Analysis] Democrats Sweep, Why Does BTC Instead Rebound in a V-Shape? What Is the Market Celebrating?
The Democrats took control of both the House and Senate, ushering Trump into a lame-duck era; yet BTC rebounded from below $76,000 to around $78,000.
Politically, Trump lost, but in trading, the market first breathed a sigh of relief.
With the election results finalized, short-term uncertainty fades, and capital begins to replenish. But this does not mean the market has fully turned optimistic.
Crypto: Legislative progress faces increased difficulty, and expectations for policy benefits cool down. BTC's rebound looks more like position repair after a panic retreat, not a restart of a policy-driven bull market.
U.S. Stocks: Resistance grows for fiscal and tariff policies. Short-term trading uncertainty diminishes; mid-term depends on whether AI investments can translate into profits.
A-shares: The STAR 50 surged 9.92%, with turnover returning to 2 trillion. Improved external sentiment provides support, but future depends on whether domestic funds can take over. SFISF is liquidity support, not direct stock purchases by the central bank.
Uncle's judgment: The market is changing its script—from betting on how fast policies can push prices up, to seeing how much policies can be implemented and how much companies can earn.
The landing of the boot brings a rebound; capital must stay for a trend to form.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 The Zcash Community Grant Committee (ZCG) has withdrawn a proposal. The proposal was to reallocate 98,000 ZEC for future mining rewards. The withdrawal was straightforward: no advancement, future fund distribution will follow the regular governance process.
Let's look at the numbers first. 98,000 ZEC is a one-time large transfer; on the other hand, ZCG currently collects about 144 ZEC daily until the network upgrade changes the rules. One is a large lump sum, the other is a steady daily cut. The proposal aimed to move the former, but the real ongoing supply impact comes from the latter.
Now the mechanism. ZCG's funds come from block reward shares, primarily to fund ecosystem development. Diverting ecosystem funds to supplement mining rewards means token holders are effectively paying for miners, which naturally causes community concerns. The withdrawal indicates the committee has done the math: rather than pushing a controversial proposal, it's better to return decision-making to the governance process.
So how to judge this short term? This news has almost no directional impact on $ZEC. The proposal never materialized; the withdrawal simply turns a potential variable back into no variable. The real focus should be on the network upgrade—once the rules change, the daily flow of 144 ZEC will change, which is the substantive supply-side shift.
One point worth pondering: the hardest part of a project is never the technology, but the consensus on how to spend money. The fact that no one dares to touch the 98,000 ZEC sitting there precisely shows that governance is not yet capable of handling large-scale allocations.If you carefully compare the trends of $BTC and the US stock market,
from September 17th rising from 75,000 to 87,000 on September 22nd,
then from October 6th dropping from 86,000+ to 75,690 on November 4th,
back and forth, BTC's movement almost exactly follows the rhythm of the Nasdaq futures CDF,
it's basically a complete little follower of the US stock market.
From the comparison, we can see:
1. 87,000 is a strong resistance level
On October 5th, the US stock market broke through the high point of September 23rd, but BTC did not follow through; it was pushed down just short of 87,000, and multiple subsequent attempts failed.
2. The 79,300-80,300 range is a strong support and resistance zone
The US stock market fell steadily from October 6th to the 26th with almost no major rebound,
but BTC dropped sharply from October 6th to the low point on the 9th at 80,300, then from October 9th to the 26th it remained supported above the 73,000-80,300 range, not strictly following the US stock market's decline.
On October 30th, after BTC followed the US stock market to break below the strong support zone at 79,300, it plunged to 76,300; the subsequent rebound's high point failed to reach 79,000 before being pushed down again. After support turned into resistance, its effectiveness was very strong.
3. Currently, on the morning of November 4th, BTC broke below the previous two days' low of 76,300 but quickly recovered, showing signs of testing the strong resistance at 79,000.
This kind of quick recovery after a break, a false breakdown with a V-shaped rebound, strongly resembles the feeling of sweeping out long liquidity and hitting the bottom. However, whether it truly bottoms out still depends on the US stock market.Trump lost, yet the crypto market surged! What is the real reason behind this $BTC and $ETH rally?
Today, mainstream coins suddenly rallied together, leaving many brothers stunned: Trump's side is struggling, so why is the crypto market rising?
Actually, the core reason for this rally is a shift in macro expectations!
First, the political deadlock has eased some market concerns.
With the Democrats taking the House, Washington may enter political gridlock, making it harder to push fiscal AMD won the earnings report, but did it win the valuation debate?
AMD delivered an almost flawless quarterly report: Q3 revenue of $13.377 billion, up 45% year-over-year, data center revenue surged 97% to $8.546 billion, Q4 guidance midpoint at $17 billion, and 2027 revenue growth guidance exceeding 80%. Commitments for gigawatt-scale deployments from OpenAI, Meta, and Oracle seem to solidify the narrative of being the "only large-scale alternative to NVIDIA."
But the bears will immediately point out a glaring fact: this "beat expectations" was delivered on a 124x P/E ratio basis, while NVIDIA's P/E ratio is only 26 to 28 times. Some fund managers sold AMD before the earnings report, citing "high valuation combined with environmental uncertainty," yet continued to hold NVIDIA. More subtle is the cash flow: free cash flow plunged 64% year-over-year to $554 million, and inventory increased by about $3 billion in one quarter. Bulls say this is stocking up for Helios volume ramp, bears say this is "profits on paper, cash stuck in the warehouse."
AMD is indeed winning, but what it’s winning is revenue growth, not valuation comfort. The 124x pricing already assumes "perfect execution" as the baseline — and the controversy lies precisely in whether a company still ramping capacity and with unproven cash flow deserves such an unforgiving expectation? #AMD数据中心收入近翻倍，营收及指引均超预期
$BTC $ETH $SNDK Starting with $35 for 100x leverage, the liquidation price is the real focus
The market dropped below 80,000, and some showed off a screen full of long positions.
With $35 margin, both $BTC and $ETH are at 100x leverage.
What does this number mean: $35 is not the position size.
It represents the total loss possible before liquidation.
100x leverage means if the price moves 1% against you, your principal is gone.
What he actually did: full position mode, maintaining a margin ratio of 335%.
Liquidation price for $BTC is 74,647, for $ETH is 2,142.
Taking it one step further, these two prices are not predictions.
They are the system's automatic sell trigger lines.
When the price hits there, the position is no longer under human control.
The liquidation price hangs there; the market decides.
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓
#$BTC $ETH #US Midterm Elections: Democrats Gain Control of Both Houses of Congress At the moment the election outcome became clear, BTC briefly dropped 2.8% breaking below 76000, ETH and SOL also fell simultaneously, then quickly rebounded to around 77800—a typical “bad news fully priced in” move, but not a reversal signal.
The core variable has changed: previously the market priced in "Trump + Republican Congress" with weak regulation, strategic BTC reserves, and CFTC takeover as the main theme; now the Clarity Act is already stalled in the Senate, and with Democrats taking over, Warren is very likely to chair the Banking Committee, which will significantly increase investigative powers over crypto capital, stablecoins, and Trump family-related transactions, making legislative benefits unlikely in the short term.
The implications for the market are straightforward:
Spot market elasticity weakens, news shifts from "policy catalyst" to "investigative disruption";
Crypto stocks (Coinbase, Strategy, etc.) options put protection costs have surged to yearly highs, with capital continuing to deleverage;
The real support comes from macro liquidity—US Treasury yields falling and a weaker dollar are positive factors for BTC, so deep drops are difficult, but new highs require a new narrative.
Tech US Stocks: AI valuations first cut multiples, then watch the overseas expansion pace
Nasdaq 100 futures initially dropped over 2%, not a panic selloff but a discounting of "AI’s wild growth." Democrats in both houses will apply pressure along three lines: data center approvals and power quotas, AI safety and antitrust, and government contract reviews. $BTC $ETH $ZEC 🔥In-depth analysis of Big Brother Maji's latest 80 million position:
Why is he shorting BTC at 78,000 but holding on tightly to HYPE??
Studying Big Brother Maji's positions is worth deep thought for brothers:
1️⃣ The “inverted pyramid” trap in ETH scaling
Look closely at the chart, he only has about 3,600 long contracts at ETH 2269 (base position), but added over 9,800 long contracts at 2427 (heavy position).
⚠️ Lesson: This is a typical “inverted pyramid scaling.” Once the market pulls back, the profits at the bottom are instantly eaten up by the heavy positions above. Currently, ETH has an unrealized loss of 1.3 million dollars, paying the price for this scaling method.
2️⃣ HYPE’s “value investing style” short
Short cost at 72.8, unrealized loss of 3.46 million dollars. But he only used 5x leverage.
Logic: He might believe HYPE is severely overvalued, so he shorts long-term with low leverage. But this ignores the irrational exuberance of the crypto market. In a bull market, undervalued can get even more undervalued, and overvalued can get even more absurd.
3️⃣ BTC’s 40x leverage gamble
Opened a 40x short at 78,104, which is an extremely high-risk “left-side trade.” He is betting on a BTC double top or pullback. Currently slightly profitable, indicating timing is okay, but once it breaks 80,000, this position will be very dangerous.
Summary: Even top whales make mistakes like “holding against the trend” and “heavy positions at high levels.” We learn from his thinking but avoid his traps $BTC $ETH $HYPE
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Many bulls (Zhou Xun version), the strength of the rise was totally unexpected, they really caught the bottom correctly
This four-hour rise should thank the market, the market fully priced in the pessimistic expectations, making everyone accept in advance that the Democrats could take both houses of Congress, and after the negative news was fully released, the result was not as bad as imagined
I didn't expect the Democrats winning to cause such a rebound; elections only change the short-term rhythm, not the long-term trend
This negative news was fully priced in advance, the negative news has landed and been fully released
It also fits the scenario where buyers expected a drop to short, and sellers faced the reality and covered their shorts
1. Mainly in these two days of the election, the market was already expecting the Democrats to sweep both houses, if Democrats won completely, the US stock market would drop at least 10%
2. The market moved with this negative news, Bitcoin also dropped to 76600, now that the Democrats have fully won and the negative news has landed, it went through a profit-taking drop to 75600
3. The negative news has landed and ended, there is no worse-than-expected news, no one-sided situation, and no immediate new policies to suppress the market, so the previously cautious funds should start entering, hence the rise
The election is the biggest uncertainty event of the year; after the boot drops, cautious funds will flow back into Bitcoin
But this short-term recovery rally doesn't mean it will rise indefinitely, after all, the Democrats are unfriendly to crypto, although they increased the possibility of a 6% interest rate hike, the overall direction is still bearish, considering the economic fundamentals, Federal Reserve rates, and oil price still relatively high at $70 per barrel
This rise is mainly due to short covering causing an oversold rebound, plus the entry of cautious election funds, driving the rise; selling at 80,000 is still strong, so shorting here remains unchanged
Next, Bitcoin will consolidate and rise to 80,000 within a week, then start to fail the breakout and fall back, dropping to around 78,800 to consolidate, just wait, it will happen soon
I placed an order at 80,300, waiting for a surge to 80,000; if it can't hold and pulls back, short positions can follow me in sync Something interesting is happening on the XRP Ledger. While $XRP has been struggling with price declines, its network activity is moving in the opposite direction. According to CryptoQuant data, daily active XRP Ledger accounts increased from 15,678 on October 3 to 36,342 on November 3 — a massive 132% increase in just one month. What's driving attention? Active receiving addresses increased by 44%. Active sending addresses climbed by approximately 41.7%. New wallet activations also showed a sig$VVV
Let's first look at a number: VVV's perpetual positions on OKX amount to 3.43 million USD.
It rose 17% today, pushing from 20.47 all the way to 24.38, with 12.4 million traded in 24 hours. Turnover is nearly four times, but positions barely grew.
The fee rate is 0.005%, only half the benchmark, perpetuals are at parity with spot, not a penny premium given. Despite such a rise, no leverage was added.
The 1-hour chart shows it more clearly: at 12:00 it opened at 21.49, 13:00 at 22.21, 14:00 at 22.63, 15:00 at 23.27, all four candles closed near their highs. Volume increased from 198,000 contracts to 340,000, then 374,000 contracts, getting heavier as it went. The 16:00 candle has 170,000 contracts and is still ongoing.
I checked the news quickly, no information about it. On CoinGecko, market cap is 1.18 billion, total network 24-hour volume is 40.4 million. Purely driven by funds.
I usually just watch these kinds of newsless rallies. Whether it's real buying on spot or high-level distribution, I don't step in, waiting to see who catches the last leg.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $ETH
2318. ETH is now priced just $10 below today's 24-hour high of 2328.44.
The news is far off. Justin Drake said he hopes Ethereum will complete its quantum resistance and post-AI transformation by the end of 2028, a year ahead of the current roadmap. 2028, a bit over two years away. This timeline is of no use for this afternoon's market.
But the market has really been moving these past two hours. At 11 o'clock, the 1-hour candle dropped to 2225.01 with a volume of 2.62 million contracts; at 12 o'clock, 2.57 million contracts reversed and pulled back to 2279. Then at 14:00, 1.16 million, 15:00 1.38 million, and at 16:00 already 1.82 million contracts, with the price climbing from 2296 to 2318, touching 2328.
Open interest is interesting too. At 13:00 I saw 1.42 billion, now 1.505 billion, an increase of 85 million. Price is up, leverage is back.
But I checked the rate, 0.0074%, below the 0.01% benchmark, and perpetual contracts are still trading at a 0.037% discount to spot. If bulls were rushing in en masse, the rate would have spiked by now. The rate is steady, open interest is increasing, indicating the other side is adding positions.
So for this wave, I see it as short covering, not a trend start. If it really is a relay, wait for the rate to rise above the benchmark first, then I'll acknowledge it.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 1. Data situation On November 3rd, a total outflow of 116 million occurred: IBIT (BlackRock) -94.98 million, BTC Mini -52.6 million, BITB (Bitwise) +21.92 million, FBTC (Fidelity) +6.76 million, MSBT +3.34 million. 1) Three-day stepwise volume contraction (-643 million — -399 million — -116 million), the bearish liquidation momentum shows a very clear three consecutive declines, indicating that the most panic-driven concentrated redemption wave has passed. 2) BlackRock recorded a rare three consecutive negative days in the past three days (234 million — 405 million — 94.98 million), with a total net outflow of 734 million USD over three days. The reasons are probably risk control reduction after breaking below the previously mentioned institutional cost line of 81,500, the large exchange security incident at the end of October, and cautious wait-and-see before the midterm elections. However, today's outflow is only 94.98 million. We will continue to monitor; if future outflows remain below 100 million or there are inflows, it would indicate that this round of passive deleveraging has ended. 3) FBTC (Fidelity) turned positive for two consecutive days, stopping panic redemptions; BITB and MSBT have begun tentative accumulation. These indicate that price-sensitive right-side/swing funds in the 76-78 range have started to exit panic and attempt left-side phased buying. 4) Currently, 80-85 is the average institutional ETF accumulation cost line for this round. We need to closely watch when institutions begin to hold #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ CircleThe US ISM Manufacturing PMI for October surged to 55.5, indicating a strong economy, but the price index remains high at 75.2, coupled with the core PCE in September bouncing back to 3.1%. The inflation beast is far from being tamed. This has led the market's expectation for a 25 basis point rate hike in December to rise to 70%, hanging a sword over risk assets.
The upcoming nonfarm payroll data (expected increase of 60,000, unemployment rate 4.2%) is arriving at this awkward critical juncture. This is not only a validation point for policy direction but also a meat grinder for both bulls and bears.
📊 【Three scenarios for the nonfarm data, pre-emptive analysis】
🔴 Strong data: rate hike expectations are fully cemented, US Treasury yields rise. $BTC faces pressure and pulls back, $ETH will fall even harder, focus on defense.
🟢 Weak data: market shifts to expect easing, liquidity improves. BTC starts a recovery rally, ETH shows even more resilience.
🟡 Data meets expectations: maintain wide-range oscillation, bulls and bears repeatedly shake out positions, wait for the December FOMC decision to set direction.
A community comment is extremely accurate: whether the nonfarm data is strong or weak, prices fall; the data itself is the risk, not the direction!
If the data is too good, rate hike expectations max out, prices must fall; if the data is too bad, recession fears intensify, prices still fall. Currently, all BTC funds are holding their breath and watching.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 $BTC
The core logic behind this deep V-shaped reversal is not a change in expectations, but a direct clearing of risk premiums.
On Polymarket, the probability of the Democratic Party winning both the House and Senate has already reached 99.6%. The market had long priced in the negative impact of tighter crypto regulations, and the market initially dropped to release panic.
The real turning point was Trump's statement accepting the election results and willingness to cooperate with the Democratic Party. The black swan risks of vote disputes and political division, which the market feared most, disappeared directly, resolving the greatest uncertainty.
After the negative factors were fully realized, bottom-fishing funds entered the market to support it, leading to this recovery rally.
But it is important to distinguish: the disappearance of the black swan ≠ a shift in regulation. The subsequent legislative battles will still be long, so do not take this as the start of a new bull market.
Focus next on tracking upcoming congressional proposals; the market will still mainly be a volatile game, so avoid blindly chasing highs. The October non-farm payrolls to be released on Friday will directly determine whether the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates in December. Currently, the CME futures market has priced in an 83% probability of a rate hike in December, with liquidity already beginning to factor this in.
The market expectations this time are very subtle: the forecast for new non-farm jobs is 65,000 (previously 29,000), with the unemployment rate stable at 4.2%.
On the surface, the data appears to be recovering from a low point, but the underlying game logic has completely changed.
The market is no longer worried about a recession caused by worsening employment, but rather about the economy "overheating" forcing the Federal Reserve into a corner.
The just-released Q3 GDP and consumer spending figures are off the charts, and AI infrastructure investment has doubled. If Friday's non-farm payrolls significantly exceed expectations (for example, surpassing 100,000), or if the year-over-year growth rate of average hourly earnings rises, a rate hike in December is basically guaranteed, and expectations of tightening liquidity will instantly crash the market.
Conversely, if the data falls within a moderate range of 50,000 to 60,000, or if wage growth slows, it could provide the market with a breathing space.
In terms of strategy, avoid high-leverage bets before the data release. Macro funds are currently highly sensitive; U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar index are already fluctuating at high levels, and any outlier data could easily trigger a double liquidation of risk assets.
Focus on the two core items at 21:30 on Friday: hourly wage growth vs. new job additions, as these directly determine the overall funding gate for December.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 $ZEC ZEC, this old project finally did something right.
They are going to stop the development fund of over 300 million USD.
From now on, 100% of the block rewards will be returned to the miners.
This is equivalent to directly removing the biggest token dilution selling pressure.
They used to keep draining, but now that selling pressure is cut off, the supply-demand structure immediately changes.
Without this massive inflation weighing down, as long as the market gets a bit of spot support, all the short positions hanging above will have to admit their mistakes one by one.
#ZEC
$ZEC
👇$SNDK SanDisk seems ready to start building a position.
This was a casual buy last night.
Placed an order around 1080, hoping for a pullback to catch me.
Short-term resistance is near 1200.
Last week when buying around the 1200 level, I mentioned that SanDisk needs to firmly hold above 1420 to continue opening up upside potential. The resistance at 1420 was not sustained and the price fell back, which was expected.
Currently, the technicals show an oversold condition, but the news has not eliminated the fundamental concern of "price increase slowdown" suppressing valuation.
Why did the stock price plunge after "good performance"?
The real trigger comes from SanDisk's manufacturing partner Kioxia. Kioxia warned that the pace of NAND price increases is sharply slowing — the price increase for the September quarter dropped from a mid-term ~70% to just over 20%, and the next quarter's prices are expected to be roughly flat. The pricing logic for memory stocks trades on the "speed of price increases," not the "price level" itself; a slowdown in price increases alone is enough to overwhelm a strong quarter.
The above is my personal opinion for reference only.#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
Republicans lost in the midterm elections, Tesla and SpaceX plunged sharply, what expectations is the market trading on?
The Democrats swept both chambers, and Elon Musk's $445 million political donations seem to have gone down the drain. He even joked on X, "The laser didn’t work this time." But the market isn’t joking — Tesla’s after-hours dropped over 3.7%, SpaceX pre-market once fell as much as 6%, and Nasdaq 100 futures followed, dropping more than 2%.
What’s being traded isn’t "Democrats won," but the "Musk premium" being stripped away. With Democrats controlling Congress, two direct pressures arise: first, the potential Tesla-SpaceX merger faces greater congressional resistance; second, the new Texas governor has explicitly paused new data center permits, putting SpaceX and Tesla’s AI infrastructure expansion in Texas under fire.
One detail worth watching: Tesla options implied volatility percentile is only 2.79%, meaning the market hasn’t priced in this political risk at all. The stock is falling, but options remain calm, indicating most haven’t yet reacted.
In short: money isn’t indiscriminately dumping tech stocks; it’s repricing the risk of being "too tightly tied to politics." Nvidia and CoreWeave’s declines are emotional contagion, but Tesla and SpaceX are the real focus.Markets often experience a recovery after midterm elections, with a rebound in the 12 months following the election being the norm. $BTC $ETH $ZEC The voting day on November 3, 2026, has passed, but counting is still ongoing. Prediction markets cited by Axios, such as Kalshi, show about a 70% probability of the Democrats sweeping both chambers, with expectations repeatedly mentioned of the House gaining over 230 seats and the Senate netting 4 additional seats. Alaska remains a key variable. However, these numbers can still change; leading on election night does not equal the final result. 2022 is an example. Before the election, many models and betting markets predicted the Republicans would gain a net 13 to 30 seats in the House, but Ballotpedia's final count was only a net gain of 9 seats. In the Senate, the Democrats held the majority 51 to 49, with Pennsylvania flipping and Georgia going to a runoff. Assuming the Democrats take both chambers, Trump could face congressional constraints similar to those Biden encountered after the midterms. Executive orders can bypass some legislation, but the debt ceiling cannot be avoided. The 2023 standoff between McCarthy and the White House serves as a reference. The debt issue will also affect market sentiment. On the day the U.S. credit rating was downgraded in 2011, gold prices rose more than 3% in a single day. Bitcoin often falls alongside risk assets during crisis phases and may only rebound once the situation eases. As for the stock market, midterm years typically bottom out, and a rebound in the 12 months after the election is the historical average, not a promise for this year's market. Rather than betting early on election outcomes, it may be more worthwhile to focus on how the market digests uncertainty and when the debt ceiling will be back on the table. The numbers on election night will change; historical averages remind us to keep a longer-term perspective. #USOne message, 1,083 accounts, 11,700 posts, 20.93 million exposures.
From 05:00 on October 30 to 20:00 on November 2, what Binance recorded was not scattered complaints but a coordinated public opinion campaign. The most significant numbers come at the end: among the 641 most active accounts, 452 are correlated and 444 fall within the same connected network. This is not many people individually dissatisfied; it is hundreds of nodes speaking according to the same script.
Looking deeper: out of 11,700 posts, 3,354 were identified as misinformation. Misinformation does not aim to convince you; it aims to "look like many people are talking." The 20.93 million exposures are its KPI—not to make you believe, but to make you repeatedly see it, causing you to mistake repetition for consensus.
The cost structure has also changed. Previously, short selling required borrowing coins, posting margin, and risking liquidation; now, a matrix of accounts plus some promotion can create the illusion that "everyone is running." Part of $BNB's price has never been based on fundamentals but on repeatedly told stories.
So what should you look at? Look on-chain, look at net inflows and outflows, and see if the depth of $BTC and $ETH has truly thinned. Public opinion can change how fast you press buttons, but it cannot change the balances in blocks.
Worth considering: when "many people talking" can be bought in bulk, the basis for judgment should shift from "how many people said it" to "who can provide evidence."US spot BTC ETFs continued net outflows on Monday, but redemptions have concentrated from multiple funds last Friday to IBIT. The scope of capital pressure has narrowed, but new buying remains thin and is still insufficient to support a strong recovery.
Both Farside and TFTC recorded: on November 2, IBIT had a net outflow of $405.3 million, with only FBTC showing a small net inflow, and the net amounts of other funds were zero. Although the total outflow decreased compared to last Friday, IBIT's own outflow actually expanded. The current improvement is mainly due to other funds stopping net outflows, rather than a broad round of capital replenishment.
Tonight, BTC is around 77,400 USDT on OKX, with a slight decline over the rolling 24 hours. For this recovery, a more convincing change would be sustained net inflows across multiple funds; relying solely on a decrease in total outflows still shows insufficient buying power. Single-day subscriptions and redemptions do not represent the attitude of all institutions. Circle is about to release its earnings report. Does issuing more stablecoins mean earning more profits?
Circle's core profit logic is actually very simple and straightforward — earning interest on USDC reserves.
They convert dollars into USDC, and $CRCL uses that money to buy short-term U.S. Treasury bonds or deposit it in banks.
The larger the USDC issuance, the bigger the reserve pool, and naturally, the more interest income can be earned.
While it's great during a rate hike cycle, once the Federal Reserve cuts rates, even if the USDC scale remains unchanged, interest income shrinks directly.
Earning more doesn't mean more money in the pocket; the money is actually shared out.
When looking at the earnings report, you can't just look at total revenue; you have to see how much is left in the end!
USDC's ability to support such a large scale relies heavily on channels like Coinbase to attract customers. Circle must share a large portion of interest income with these partners, which is a significant amount.
Plus compliance, technical maintenance, and ecosystem subsidies, often the scale grows but the final net profit is not much.
So, can it continue to deliver profits in the future?
What the market cares about is not how long it can earn interest income, but whether it can grow and stabilize its business!
With regulatory policies becoming clearer worldwide, many traditional large institutions and cross-border trade have started to dare to use USDC for settlement, which is a solid real demand.
Ultimately, what determines its success is whether it can expand its business into payment gateway services, software fees, and other non-interest income, no longer relying solely on the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Don't think that just because the Democratic Party took control of both chambers, the dawn has come. This is a classic pump-and-dump based on buying expectations and selling facts; political bickering and regulatory tightening are just beginning, and the full realization of positive news is actually a signal of a market shift.
Looking at $BTC, the big coin, election expectations have long been overextended. Historical patterns show that after every midterm election, BTC first undergoes a violent shakeout to the bottom before rebounding. Now with the two chambers and the White House balancing each other, subsequent bills will all get stuck, creating huge policy uncertainty. Even a slight market stir will cause bulls to panic sell, and new lows could be hit at any time.
Looking at $ETH, Ethereum is a weak follower. With the Democrats controlling both chambers, digital asset regulation is very likely to tighten, casting serious doubt on the effectiveness of the industry's previous lobbying efforts that spent over $200 million. Capital fears uncertainty the most; Ethereum's ecosystem already lacks new narratives, and once the regulatory shadow falls, the decline will definitely amplify, with no decent resistance.
From a macro perspective, the split Congress means large-scale fiscal stimulus is completely off the table. Don't treat the election as a free pass; the real threats are non-farm payrolls and inflation data. The high-interest environment hasn't changed at all, and the market is about to face the test of data surprises.
Looking at $XAUT, gold is the real hard currency. The White House is constrained by Congress, fiscal policy is blocked, and with sticky inflation, safe-haven funds can only flow into gold. Central bank buying underneath is firmly supporting it, and its resilience absolutely outperforms the crypto space.
In summary, the election results are the fuse for a market shift. Heavy resistance lies above; blindly chasing highs is a death sentence. Protect your positions and guard against a series of sharp drops. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Democrats sweep Congress, crypto legislation is dead, but crypto is not dead
Senate Democrats hold 52 seats, flipping six red states. Warren will lead the Senate Banking Committee, Waters will lead the House Financial Services Committee.
1. The CLARITY Act is entering its death countdown.
Procedural vote on September 15 was 49-50, 11 votes short. Now it can't even get scheduled. TD Cowen's judgment: it won't pass within two years.
2. Subpoena power changes hands, this is the easiest to overlook.
Waters' committee has subpoena power, can investigate Trump's family's crypto projects and CZ's pardon. Negative headlines will continue for the next two years, specifically targeting "politically connected coins."
But three things remain unchanged:
· Spot ETFs cannot be withdrawn.
· Regulatory rules continue. SEC's crypto asset rules and CFTC's exchange framework are within existing institutional authority and do not require Congress approval.
· Legislative freeze for two years, but the industry will not freeze for two years.
The market has long priced in this news:
Bloomberg surveyed 301 traders, median BTC price under Democratic sweep scenario at year-end is $76,450. Current price is $77,345. The price is standing at this valuation, no second shock expected.
So don't use the election as a reason to open positions.
What to really watch are these three things:
11/6 October Nonfarm Payrolls
11/11 MSCI decision on whether to exclude MSTR and other Bitcoin reserve companies
12/9 Federal Reserve decision票数还没数完，钱已经先投了票。美国中期选举结果陆续出来，民主党拿下众议院，预测市场把两院一起翻过去的概率压到七成七。反应最直接的不是股市，是美元——被卖了一整轮；纳斯达克盘中一度掉1.5%，AI那批股票最先挨刀。 为什么先砍AI？因为这次选举有一张很具体的牌：数据中心。民主党主张踩一脚刹车，得州和俄亥俄的州长票就是围着数据中心打的；而科技公司上一轮大选跟共和党绑得很深，现在要面对的是监管、调查和罚单。这跟道德无关，是算票算术。 传导链摆在这里：美元这半年越来越像AI资本开支的镜子，钱往数据中心走就买美元，钱往外撤就卖美元。所以"抛美元"三个字，对风险资产是顺风。美债收益率还在4.9%上方绷着，无风险那头没松口，但美元的边际方向已经变了——这是这一轮和前面几轮最不一样的地方。 加密站到了顺风那边。数据截至本轮：大饼24小时+2.3%回到78,352，以太+2.5%，全场清算约3.24亿美元，其中多头1.89亿、空头1.35亿。注意这个结构：两头顶着爆，杠杆刚被清过一遍，不是一边倒的拥挤盘。 我说一个反直觉的：短期顺风、中期逆风，这两句话同时成立。俄亥俄那个参议院席位如果真被翻过去，明年国$PEPE
With no new fundamental news, how should we analyze PEPE's volatility?
This type of asset relies more on liquidity, attention, and holding structure; price increases alone are hard to prove as value growth. After industry risk events, weak trading depth is especially worth noting.
If spot trading is dispersed and bid-ask spreads remain stable, demand can better absorb volatility; if trading is concentrated, leverage expands, and depth decreases, I would lower my confidence in the sustainability of the market trend.After the breakdown, don't just focus on the price
$BTC dipped to $75,690, $ETH touched $2,225, and both previous lows were breached simultaneously. But more critical than the price is that positions are "changing hands."
In the past 24 hours, BTC perpetual open interest (OI) dropped about 2.1%; over the past 7 days, ETH perpetual OI fell about 6.2%, and the total market OI declined in sync, indicating that old leverage is still exiting. On the other hand, OKX coin-margined OI slightly increased from a low level: BTC about +0.4%, ETH about +0.8%. This is not a simple clearing out; some are deleveraging while others are placing new bets. Whether the new positions are bottom-fishing longs or trend-following shorts cannot be determined yet.
More caution is needed regarding funding rates: BTC remains near +0.01%, ETH has cooled down but is still significantly above the 7-day average. Price breakdown and total position decline, yet the remaining long costs are not low, indicating an unstable structure.
There are two key points to watch going forward: first, whether BTC’s $75,690 can form effective support; second, whether ETH can reclaim $2,236. If prices weaken further and total market OI shifts from declining to rising, it can be considered that new directional funds have officially taken over. At the current stage, the first round of deleveraging may have ended, but the second round of the long-short battle is just beginning.
#美国10月非农前瞻：就业增长或牵动12月加息预期 Leverage has been cleared out, but the fee rate hasn't dropped yet, and the $SOL short position at 123 dollars is being targeted
$BTC leverage cleared, bulls still holding strong
BTC is at 76,640, hitting a new monthly low. The total open interest across the network has dropped to a 12-month low, with leverage basically wiped out. However, the funding rate remains positive at +0.0100%, meaning bulls are still paying to hold their positions. Chips have been cleared, but costs haven't decreased; this is not a healthy bottom.
$ETH 100x staking lock-up, but ETFs are rapidly withdrawing
ETH is at 2,292, with resistance between 2,298 and 2,341 at the upper Bollinger Band. There are 1.37 million tokens queued for staking on-chain, with only 13,000 exiting, a ratio of 100:1. However, ETFs have had net outflows for six consecutive days, with a single-day withdrawal of 140 million. 2,246 is the critical line; if broken, look to 2,284 as the liquidation zone for 55.5 million long positions.
$SOL 250,000 short tokens openly placed at 123
SOL is near 91, having lost previous support. Bullish leverage has mostly been washed out, and spot funds are providing a bottom. But there is a large on-chain short position that hasn't been withdrawn; the liquidation line for 250,000 $SOL is firmly stuck at 123 dollars. If the main force pulls it up a bit, it will trigger liquidations, and passive buy orders will enter directly.
Summary: Watch when BTC funding rate admits defeat and turns negative, ETH defends 2,246, and whether spot support for SOL can push shorts toward 123.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ #Anthropic潜在IPO投资者建议估值降至1.5万亿美元
"Anthropic Valuation Cut"
Institutions suggest lowering Anthropic's valuation to between $1.5 trillion and $1.6 trillion, below the expected $2 trillion.
Q3 revenue was $16.956 billion, down 47% quarter-over-quarter, with a single-quarter loss of $567 million.
Computing power commitments reached $895.4 billion, with $69.8 billion expiring within a year; the next financial report milestone is critical. $BTC $BTC This rebound wave: the market has priced in in advance that the Democratic Party is very likely to take control of Congress. It is expected that the subsequent aggressive crypto-friendly bills will slow down, but the negative impact has already been fully priced in, following the "bad news is fully out" trading logic. At the same time, it moves in tandem with the Nasdaq and tech risk assets, showing a strong correlation between BTC and the US stock market.
$ETH #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #BTC spot ETF funds fluctuate, can the market buying hold steady?
Wednesday noon BTC: This morning's post was still around 77,000, dipped to about 75,700 between 10–11 am, then lifted back in the afternoon, current price about 78,400, roughly +1450 compared to this morning. F&G 34 (Fear). The latest complete ETF day is still 11/02: US spot BTC net outflow about 398.6 million; election window in the background, not mainly riding it.
The simulated observation position is still open, this morning's low didn't bet on a crash through, afternoon lift back didn't add leverage betting on holding overnight high. Reminder 78414 / 78414 / 78066 — intraday high, current price, overnight high. The above are observation points/planned reminders, not trade calls.
In the afternoon, lifting back from this morning's low near the overnight high, which side are you on: A take profits near the high first, or B keep holding to see if it can hold? Comment A or B. $BTC 📉The three giants have fallen three times in a row! Bears are celebrating wildly, how far can this drop go?
$BTC $ETH $SOL
The three giants of the crypto world have experienced three consecutive declines
This wave is another wild celebration for the bears
$BTC
Directly fell below 77,000 USD
Currently still continuing to probe lower
Still some distance from the previously mentioned 75,000
But according to the current trend
There is a chance to directly break below 74,000 USD
$ETH
Smaller in size than BTC
The decline in this round is relatively small
The stepped downward trend is very clear
Any rebound is easily crushed back down
$SOL
Once a strong coin
The trend is gradually weakening
Most likely to first break below 90, then look at 85
Only after stabilizing is there a chance to rebound near 95
Interest rate hike expectations are repeatedly tugging
The market continues to be under pressure, with no end in sight
If you found this review useful, please give a like!
Press 1 if you are optimistic about further declines and breakdowns, press 2 if you are waiting for stabilization and rebound
This is only a market review and does not constitute investment advice
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ Uniswap officially named Robinhood Chain as the fastest chain to reach $100 billion in trading volume. Robinhood Crypto retweeted the confirmation on the same day, stating that the figure is the fastest ever, not just media hype.
This is cumulative volume, not a single-day spike. The rapid surge is likely due to meme and gambler traffic piling up during the new chain's cold start; protocol fees and UNI holder dividends may not keep pace. The milestone proves liquidity can rise but does not guarantee the moat is secure. Arbitrum's official account also congratulated, indicating competitors acknowledge this achievement.
Don't directly convert the speed record into a valuation re-rating. If within two weeks the chain's weekly Uniswap volume falls below half the peak, or spot price drops below 6.8 and fails to recover, treat this as a cold start report card. Snapshot around 16:06 Beijing time, Binance spot about $7.49, 24h approximately +6.9%.
$UNI
#UNI #Uniswap #cryptocurrency #Báo cáo tài chính của Circle sắp ra mắt, liệu sự tăng trưởng của stablecoin có thể hiện thực hóa lợi nhuận không? The common people voted with their feet; inflation ultimately sent the Democratic Party into Congress. The midterm election results are out, with the Democrats sweeping both chambers, and Trump directly hobbling. Those previously staunchly supportive states flipped blue, basically because supermarket discount goods were snapped up, and oil prices rose higher than milk—people just couldn't make ends meet, so naturally, they voted out the ruling party.
At the moment the results came out, BTC got scared and even dropped below $76,000 because the market feared the Democrats would crack down hard on the crypto industry. But within a few hours, it made a V-shaped recovery back above $78,000. The reason is simple: no matter who wins, once the boot drops, the biggest uncertainty is gone. Capital fears bad news less than it fears not knowing what pitfalls lie ahead.
In the short term, don’t expect the Democrats to hand out sweeteners to the market; those folks have never been friendly to cryptocurrencies, and tighter regulation is a real pressure. But fortunately, the White House is still in Trump's hands; he has veto power to block outrageous bills and can push administrative orders, so there won’t be a catastrophic policy reversal. Both sides will keep tugging, and crypto legislation will most likely turn into a long tug-of-war.
The real key to BTC’s fate has never been who wins the election, but whether the Federal Reserve and the market have enough money. Inflation is still high now, so the Fed can’t immediately turn to easing; if the dollar strengthens, BTC will still have to stay down.
In short, the election just blew away the political fog; what we should focus on next are inflation data and interest rate trends. Whether $78,000 can hold is ten thousand times more important than who won the midterms.The rally looks impressive, but liquidation data suggests a different story.
$BTC saw $33.74M in short liquidations compared to just $6.7M in longs, pointing to a short squeeze rather than strong organic buying pressure.
$ETH followed the same trend, with $34.87M in short positions wiped out. Forced buying fueled the upside, but genuine spot demand is still unconfirmed.
$CORE highlighted how quickly momentum can reverse, with both long and short positions getting liquidated. $ADA ADA holds a market cap of 7 billion USD, but the daily on-chain fees are only $1,400.
Even the turnover of a small village shop is higher.
The community constantly brags about the technology, but on-chain, no one is actually spending Gas to use it.
It's all just existing old holders holding on hard.
Without a real ecosystem to support it, this kind of purely faith-driven inflated market cap can't withstand even a little selling pressure at the bottom.
#ADA
$ADA
👇It's often said that platform tokens rely on burning to support their valuation, but when I actually looked into the cash flows of BNB, HYPE, and OKB, I found they are quite different.
$BNB is the one with real income. Q3 network revenue was $54.2 million, a quarter-on-quarter increase of 54%, but daily active addresses dropped 14% to 2.1 million. Tokenized stock trading volume was $25.6 billion, which looks large, but 80% is concentrated in just one product, QQQB. There were 37 burns totaling 1.646 million tokens, supply compressed to 131.5 million, with a target of 100 million. Although it makes money, the revenue structure is too thin, and currently the burn narrative is insufficient to push the token price up.
$HYPE has the strongest cash flow, with cumulative revenue of $1.34 billion, 97% of fees flowing back to AF buybacks, having already bought $1.26 billion worth of chips. Annualized buyback is 7.5%, P/E ratio is 13, the model is clean. But the unlock on November 6, which will bring about $760 million selling pressure at current prices, is looming overhead, so it's best to wait and see before it lands.
$OKB is the most boring, with no protocol revenue, no L1 narrative, fixed supply of 21 million tokens, and 0% inflation over 90 days. It's a pure deflationary shadow, but in a flat market, it actually highlights value.
Each deflation narrative has its own storyline. Whether there will be sustained buying support really depends on real cash flow and selling pressure.$CORE still needs to play with big coins; at least big coins have inflows. Look at this thing, outflows for 100 days and 90 days, inflows are pitifully low, maybe just 100 million outflow, 5 million inflow 这波拉升更像一场空头挤压，不像真正的买盘在接管。 你看到的是追涨信号，还是又一次被清算数据推着走的FOMO？ 周末复盘清算图的时候，我第一反应是：这不像增量资金进场，更像一场被迫平仓的连锁反应。BTC 这边空头被清掉约 3374 万美元，多头只有 670 万，比例悬殊得有点刺眼。ETH 几乎是同一个剧本，3487 万空头被抹掉。翻译成人话就是：价格是被"强制买回"推上去的，而不是有人心甘情愿在这里建仓。 这就带出一个容易被忽略的点：当上涨主要由空头回补驱动，行情的"燃料"其实是一次性的。空头平完了，推力就断了。真正决定能不能延续的，是现货买盘愿不愿意在这个位置接手，而目前这一点还没有被确认。所以现在的阶段，我更愿意定义成博弈与洗筹的混合体，不是干净的追涨窗口。 CORE 的走势是个很好的提醒：多空两头都被清算，说明节奏切换可以非常快，前一刻还在逼空，下一刻就可能反过来清洗追高的人。这种结构下，山寨的情绪弹性会被放大，涨得急，回撤也会很干脆。风险偏好看似回暖，但底层并不稳，更像是情绪被衍生品杠杆临时点燃。 偏多的路径当然存在：如果现货成交在挤压结束后继续放大，说明是真需求接棒，那这波就不Waiting for the wind is not as good as lying flat first (￣▽￣)ノ
Today, queues at polling stations across the US made me question life, and the results won't be slowly revealed until early Wednesday morning. At times like this, the best move is actually—doing nothing. (:з」∠)
$TRUMP fell the hardest, dropping six points and wiping out all the positions built before the election. It’s the most sensitive to political outcomes; whoever wins could amplify volatility. I didn’t move a single share; touching it before the results is basically gambling with life (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
$XRP is relatively stable, even slightly up. It depends on who controls the regulatory framework and whether the congressional balance changes—these directly determine the pace of progress. I’m holding my long-term position; that’s where it should be ٩(๑•̀ω•́๑)۶
$DOGE is weak in the middle, following the market’s slow decline with no independent story. Meme coins only follow sentiment during event weeks, don’t expect it to move first. If you want to add positions, wait for the results first (￣▽￣)ゞ
The market before the results is the fairest: no one knows the answer, so no one should move. Waiting for the wind is not as good as lying flat first~ (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ $ETH $BTC Is this major rally in mainstream coins a rebound recovery or a bull trap???
The bottom rebound and this wave of gains are mainly because the Democrats took control of both houses, removing the negative overhang. The US stock market's strong rebound even led to a V-shaped recovery for the bottomless pit that is SanDisk. Ultimately, the election is just a short-term fluctuation; the real direction is still determined by the Federal Reserve's interest rates and inflation data. Volatility will still amplify as stimulus is digested, so do not blindly chase orders at this position. Control your position size and wait for a clear stabilization signal before taking action. $SNDK
Mainstream coins have fully absorbed the negative news and have surged in a deep V shape. The key level of the market structure is pushing back; with such gains pre-market, there might still be action before the US stock market opens tonight. Remember not to panic or take chances.
Follow Kaige for continuous in-depth market analysis and capital game logic to help you identify opportunities and avoid risks! #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #AMD数据中心收入近翻倍，营收及指引均超预期 Calculate it: for every 1% adverse movement in the nominal position, about one-quarter of the theoretical initial margin will be consumed. This rate of amplified profit and loss is the starting point for how I read this trade.
Core Trader 74 (0x68cb35…02d1e) opened a long ETH position this time with 25x leverage, holding 89.5446 ETH, with a nominal value of approximately $205,500, at a reference price of $2295.5.
① Dividing the nominal value by 25, the theoretical initial margin is about $8,222, excluding fees. I do not interpret the $205,500 nominal value as the amount of principal invested; nominal exposure and principal are accounted separately.
② Roughly calculating 1 ÷ 25, an adverse movement of about 4% approaches the theoretical liquidation distance, corresponding to a reference price drop of about $92. This is not the actual liquidation price; margin mode, additional funding, and maintenance margin requirements will affect the result, but the buffer is clearly thin.
③ The $2295.5 reference price is just a material reference and cannot be directly taken as the average price of the entire position. If this is an add-on, the original average price will affect the overall risk; with current information insufficient, I will not judge the quality of the entry position based on this.
My judgment is that the price tolerance requirement for this long position is more important to watch than the nominal amount. Even if the direction is correct, it may not withstand adverse fluctuations during the process; going forward, I want to observe whether the average price and leverage change together, and I won’t take a large position to bolster my judgment.#On-chain tokenized stock scale hits a new high, traditional financial institutions accelerate layout Sony earnings preview
The whale long-short ratio gap widens, how to identify short-term signals?
31.9% of the whale long-short ratio is on SOL, shorts have already taken floating profits; this signal can explain the oscillation pressure in the 15-minute cycle but cannot confirm a downward breakout. ETH's 24.02% long-short ratio corresponds to the 2291 price level, both longs and shorts are at a loss; it only indicates a stalemate, not an imminent directional choice.
BTC's whale long-short ratio is 20.01%, price 77825, indicator divergence has appeared. Holding this position maintains the original long structure; once broken, the likelihood of a pullback will significantly increase.
Open the position list, check the stop-loss points of short-term positions, and confirm they match your own risk tolerance.
$SOL $ETH $BTC #BTC spot ETF capital outflow, corporate treasury accumulation slows down
$BTC I am temporarily watching. The price and active buy-sell orders have not given a consistent direction yet.
Analysis: BTC faces resistance at the upper cost line of short-term holders, with a pullback observation range between $72,300 and $75,700.
OKX BTC perpetual contracts have had nearly 4 full hours with active buying at 52.9%, open interest increased by 5.34%, and the current funding rate is 0.0088%. Buying and selling forces are close, and changes in open interest do not equal net capital inflow.
The lowest point of the previous 20 hourly candles is 75,690.1, the highest is 78,170.2; only a volume breakout close has directional significance.
Market analysis, for reference onlyUnderstand the current BTC with three numbers
First number: $78,155.90. This is the current price of BTC, 24h +0.91%, last 7 days -3.92%, last 30 days -8.65%. The data speaks: short-term shows signs of stabilization, but the last 30 days still indicate a deep correction.
Second number: 15%. This is BTC's position percentile within the last 30-day range. 15% means it is currently in the lower part of the range, valuation pressure has mostly been released, and the margin of safety is increasing.
Third number: $76,807 ~ $85,561. This is the current key operating range—support at $76,807 below, resistance at $85,561 above. As long as the price stays within this range, it is consolidating; a breakout above $85,561 targets $87,273, a breakdown below $76,807 targets $74,502.
Connecting the three numbers, the conclusion is clear: BTC is currently in a "low-level consolidation" phase, direction unclear, but downside risk is narrowing.
Strategy: sell high and buy low within the range, respond with light positions; increase activity after a volume breakout above $85,561 or breakdown below $76,807.
Numbers don't lie, but they can change. Data is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice.Conclusion first: $CC current price is 0.0994, up 5.8% in 24 hours. On October 30, I wrote about it here with the title "The day institutional narrative was loudest, but the coin price was green," at that time it was 0.0958. What really changed: today the SEC recognized Canton Coin as a digital commodity and granted a conditional minting exemption—this is the first time the institutional narrative has regulatory endorsement.
But the three numbers in the wallet are more important.
① Trading volume is still thin. Perpetual 24-hour volume is 2.74 million USD, spot only 1.21 million, 2.3 times difference. The narrative is institutional, but the chips are still retail.
② Funding rate flipped. On November 3 it was -0.0218% (shorts paying longs), today at 12:00 it turned to +0.005% floor price, longs are no longer squeezed.
③ Open interest only rose 2.7%, from 2.629 million to 2.701 million USD. Market cap is 3.97 billion USD, Canton chain TVL is only 13.78 million, accounting for 0.35% of market cap. On-chain business hasn't started yet.
So this rally, leverage hasn't caught up, my previous conclusion needs revision: it's not "$CC is bought by retail," but "$CC still has no on-chain business to buy." It is still 48.8% away from ATH.
Do you believe this is the start of a revaluation, or just another narrative pulse? $CC