Orbit Post Sitemap
$CORE Major breaking development! 70.2% of stolen assets recovered, but this hard fork has also sparked greater controversy!
Another security incident in the crypto market has a follow-up worth noting.
This time, it's not just about recovering funds; more importantly, it raises the question: to what extent can a public blockchain alter its ledger to recover stolen assets?
According to the latest update from b14g, the Core network has recovered approximately 68.15 million $CORE from three attacker-controlled addresses through a hard fork.
What does this mean?
In the October 31 security incident, about 97.05 million CORE were affected, and the current recovery rate has reached approximately 70.2%.
This recovery rate is indeed noteworthy.
But what truly deserves reflection is the underlying technology and governance mechanisms.
1️⃣ What does recovering assets through a hard fork actually mean?
This time, the Core network adjusted the ledger state via a hard fork to recover some assets controlled by the attackers.
From the outcome, this is an important asset recovery progress.
However, from the perspective of blockchain governance, it also raises another issue:
When a network can modify the ledger state through governance and consensus mechanisms, how should security and decentralization be balanced?
The ability to recover assets is a security capability; the ability to decide to modify the ledger involves governance power.
These two are not the same concept.
2️⃣ Nearly 28.9 million CORE remain unresolved
Currently $SNDK 近期走势和下跌核心原因 1. 前期巨大涨幅，筹码获利盘极厚 过去一年是超级主升浪，股价从低位一路暴涨；10月冲高之后进入剧烈回调，单月最大回撤幅度很大，属于“利好兑现”行情。 2. 利空不是闪迪自己，是上游合作方铠侠（Kioxia）指引降温 铠侠下调盈利预期，明确提示：NAND涨价斜率放缓。 存储板块交易的核心不是“涨价”，而是涨价的加速度。 之前NAND单季涨70%，最近一个季度只涨25%。增速放缓，周期股估值就要杀，哪怕现价还在涨、利润还在创新高。 市场担心：AI存储需求的高景气能不能持续、云厂商会不会减少长期锁单。 3. 板块联动：美光、铠侠一起被带崩，存储周期情绪集体转弱。 看多逻辑（支撑） 1. AI推理对大容量闪存需求是新增量，和过去手机、PC驱动的老周期不一样；HBF高带宽闪存标准推进，专门面向AI推理，打开长期空间； 2. 供给端约束：原厂没有大规模扩产计划，资本开支克制，不容易快速过剩； 3. 长协锁单：头部云厂商签长期供货合约，一部分需求提前锁定； 4. 公司现金流极强，持续大额回购，拆股有利于散户流动性。 中期选举前后会反弹一波后面 可能会深度反#Palantir财报前瞻：高增长能否支撑高估值 Historically, PLTR's actual EPS quarter-over-quarter growth rates for the past five quarters were +46%, +26%, +42%, and +21%. The threshold to be met this quarter is not high itself. About 90%: reported value ≥ $0.43. The past momentum of exceeding expectations combined with the incremental revenue needed to cross the line is only about 3–4% above guidance.$PLTR Earnings Preview: Revenue Is Just the Ticket In, the Real Price Driver Is the Full-Year Guidance!
$PLTR will release its Q3 earnings tonight after the U.S. market close, with a conference call scheduled at 6 AM Beijing time tomorrow morning.
The real market concern this time might not be whether revenue beats expectations, but a more practical question:
Can Palantir still rely on growth to justify its nearly 100x forward P/E ratio?
Let's look at the stock price first.
Last Friday, $PLTR dropped 6.27%, closing at $184.11, about 14% down from the all-time high of $213.
The stock price fell, but the valuation remains expensive.
The forward P/E is close to 97x, meaning the market is buying not today's performance but the expectation of sustained high growth over the next several years.
1. The real test: How much can growth continue in Q4?
Previously, the company raised its full-year revenue guidance to $8.15 billion.
Based on the first three quarters' data and the Q4 guidance, Q4 revenue needs to reach about $2.42 billion.
Here’s the issue:
Last year’s Q4 revenue was about $1.41 billion; if this forecast holds, Q4 year-over-year growth might drop to around 72%.
What the market really hopes for is whether the company can further raise its full-year guidance.
If the full-year revenue target can be increased above $8.26 billion, then the Q4 growth expectation has a chance to stay around 80%.
This is the key figure to watch tonight.
2. The second risk: order growthApple's quarterly earnings report is highly likely to exceed expectations, but the market is really focused on the guidance for the next quarter. The disclosed revenue for fiscal 2026 Q4 is $109.417 billion, with diluted EPS of $2.02. Before the report, institutions expected about $113.4 billion in revenue and EPS of $1.99; the final result was near the upper end of the guidance. The main points to watch next are: next quarter's revenue guidance—whether it can achieve mid-single-digit growth or higher; gross margin trends—memory price increases may compress profit margins; and service business growth—App Store growth is relatively slow, with subscription services receiving more attention. Therefore, this time it feels more like "meeting this quarter's targets, setting the direction for next quarter." If next quarter's guidance is weak, the stock price may still experience significant fluctuations. This does not constitute investment advice. The whale with a short position of over 60 million dollars on the $ZEC order book never intended to exit.
Opened at 1336 with 3x leverage, holding several million in unrealized profits, just lying there daily collecting interest from the longs.
With this kind of position cost, retail traders bouncing a couple of times below are simply paying a toll. As long as this big player doesn't close or retreat, the top is a welded iron ceiling.
#ZEC
$ZEC
👇$ETH ETH's chart is really unbearable to watch. The 30-day contract net outflow has directly hit 9.659 billion USD, showing the main players' determination to dump and flee more than anyone else. Plus, hackers still hold 500,000 ETH they've exchanged, ready to dump and cash out at any time, creating massive selling pressure above. The moving averages are all in a bearish alignment, with each high lower than the last. Any rebound under this trend is basically a bull trap. If the 2174 level breaks, there will be no support below.
#ETH
$ETH
👇Last night, while watching the market, my heart really raced for a moment. When the BTC theft incident hit, my first reaction was that it was over, and that the 76,000 barrier would probably break. But it actually bounced back near 76,500. Guess what that means? The negative impact from the theft didn’t break through; is it because the buying pressure is strong, or did the panic sellers just finish exiting first? Honestly, at times like this, I’m actually hesitant to get too excited because emotional trading is the most deceptive. The incident itself is significant, but the price didn’t break down accordingly, which means the market isn’t trading on a "disaster," but rather on "whether anyone will step in after the negative news settles." Some short-term panic selling did happen, but now it depends on whether funds are willing to come back and support, not just on an emotional rebound. What concerns me more is the contract structure. Long positions outnumber shorts, and during the pullback phase, the funding rate has remained positive. This actually indicates that not many dare to push the price down, and some are buying both spot and contracts during the dip. Sounds bullish, right? But this is also a risk point: crowded longs mean that if 76,500 fails to hold, stop-losses and position reductions will trigger a stampede, amplifying the drop, and all the previous optimism will be shattered. So my current position management is very restrained; I’m not chasing highs, just watching one level: can 76,500 hold? If it holds, there’s a chance next week to test the 79,100 to 80,000 range; if it doesn’t, all previous bullish logic is invalidated. This isn’t "stable"—it’s a close fight between bulls and bears below 77,000, and whoever lets go first will be passive. To sum up: the fact that the negative impact didn’t break through is a signal, but the real answer lies at 76,500, not in emotions. This does not constitute investment advice. #US October Nonfarm Payrolls Released: Is There Still a Chance for a Rate Cut?
【Follow Old Leek, Wealth Is Yours】
US October nonfarm payrolls are about to be released: the job market is cooling down, and the market is waiting for the key answer!
1️⃣ September nonfarm payrolls increased by only 29,000 jobs, employment clearly slowing
US September nonfarm employment increased by only 29,000 jobs, with the unemployment rate rising to 4.2%.
The cooling job market theoretically eases the pressure on the Federal Reserve to maintain high interest rates.
2️⃣ Wage growth slows, but inflation pressure cannot be ignored
Average hourly earnings in September rose 0.1% month-over-month and 3.0% year-over-year, below previous wage growth rates.
3️⃣ October nonfarm market expectations are about 55,000 to 60,000 new jobs
Currently, market institutions predict about 55,000 to 60,000 new jobs in October, with the unemployment rate expected to remain around 4.2%.
📊 What impact does this have on the crypto market?
$BTC : Nonfarm payrolls below expectations may drive the market to increase bets on easing policies, but if employment data is poor enough to trigger recession fears, BTC could also face risk asset sell-offs.
$ETH : Sensitive to US dollar liquidity and market risk appetite, rising rate cut expectations may improve valuation environment.
$SOL : If market risk appetite recovers, high-volatility assets like SOL may gain more attention, but it still depends on capital flows. Why is Intel a warning sign during the same crash, while Google might be a golden opportunity?
Recently, tech stocks have collectively pulled back, and many people are watching Intel and Google, wondering if such a big drop means a chance to buy in?
But I want to say: a big price drop doesn’t necessarily mean it’s worth bottom-fishing. What really matters is why it dropped!
🔴 $INTC Intel: What’s dropping might not be an opportunity, but operational difficulties.
On the surface, the stock price has pulled back sharply and seems cheap enough. But what really needs caution is the fundamental pressure: cash flow under strain, foundry business expansion falling short of expectations, and future profitability still uncertain.
If the company’s core business logic doesn’t improve, no matter how cheap the stock is, it might just be a stop on the way down.
The biggest fear in bottom-fishing isn’t buying expensive, but buying the wrong logic.
🟢 $GOOGL Google: Short-term pressure doesn’t mean long-term value disappears.
This time, the market’s concern about Google’s pullback focuses on increased AI investment#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单
Apple gave a revenue growth guidance of 14% to 17% for the last quarter, significantly higher than the 9.1% increase analysts expected at the time; meanwhile, the company warned that a surge in AI demand has caused a shortage of storage chips, which may limit future hardware supply. These two factors will directly affect the deviation direction between this quarter's actual performance and market expectations.October's situation: Bitcoin's heat went from a high stir-fry straight down to a slow simmer, with a ring of burnt smell clinging to the pot's edge — a 7.3% drop dragged the main dish's presentation from 80,000 down to the bottom plate at 77,000, with a lingering warmth of 78,000 on the rim. Even worse, on the 30th, spot Bitcoin fund customers withdrew orders totaling 643 million in one go; the enthusiasm for adding dishes over four days vanished just as quickly, and the table turnover cooled faster than a cold dish, with the front and back of the house all hearing the cancellation bells.
The platform premium index has been negative for 38 consecutive days, hitting its lowest point since November 2022 — it's like the salt in the seasoning jar got damp and clumped, the salty flavor can't suppress the sourness, and the whole pot of broth lost its freshness. When the premium turns negative, it means on-exchange money is cheaper than off-exchange, and the aroma of the main dish can't waft out of the kitchen. If the base flavor of spot demand can't be lifted, no matter how many times the main dish is reheated or rearranged, it only looks good but tastes stale. The four days of inflows were like temporary walk-in guests, arriving fast and leaving faster; the real regulars haven't even come through the door.
Cooking requires the main dish to set the plate, seasoning to refresh, and chili to finish. Now the main dish has shrunk half an inch, the seasoning has soured the base, and the chili hasn't even hit the pot but already smells acrid — the rhythm of this meal is completely off.
Looking at the kitchen's ledger: October's miner revenue was 1.215 billion, a new high for eleven months, but revenue per unit of computing power dropped 17.5%. What does this mean? Purchase prices have hit the ceiling, but output has shrunk — kitchen costs are rising, gross profit is thinning, and miners either have to turn down the heat to save fuel or clear inventory by putting their stock on display. This selling pressure can lift the pot lid at any time, especially when output per unit of computing power is still declining; if inventory isn't cleared, the fire burns with anxiety.
Next door, the US stock token targets are also rattling their plates; this linked seasoning can't be left out, but can't be overused either — too much and the flavors mix, blurring the main dish's structure.
The overall ratio at this table is now most awkward: main dish shrinking, base flavor souring, kitchen costs inverted, and the neighboring table still rattling plates. For spot demand to reheat, it depends on whether the salt jar dries out or clumps first; if miners really start clearing inventory, the amount of extra spicy chili must be measured carefully — one more spoonful and the stomach churns; one less and the fishy smell can't be suppressed.
Thirty-eight days of negative premium isn't a seasoning mishap, it's that the whole pot's base broth never really got going — no matter how strong the fire, it can't simmer out that freshness. #btcmarketsignalsdivergeI said last week that AI-driven storage demand is real, and the industry boom is undeniable. But so is the capital-driven hype. Last Friday, storage stocks took a major hit despite strong earnings: $SKHYNIX dropped nearly 8%, $MU fell 5.3%, and $SNDK plunged 13.47%. The market is now questioning more than just valuations. Rising memory prices could hurt downstream demand, forcing customers to become more cautious with budgets and inventories. AI servers and HBM demand remain strong, so the entirJasmyCoin ($JASMY)
📱 Personal data ownership is an increasingly important digital issue. Jasmy focuses on connecting IoT devices with data management solutions that give users more control over information. Its success depends on practical adoption, not just a strong concept. Would you trust a blockchain-based platform to manage your personal data?The surgical light is already on, the chest cavity has not yet been sawed open, but the numbers on the monitor have already started to scream. #PalantirQ3Valuation In this operation, the market is not watching the incision, but the valuation heart that has already been pushed to an extremely high pressure level, wondering if it can still maintain perfusion pressure.
The imaging data from the last quarter is laid out on the table: revenue grew 93% year-over-year, U.S. commercial revenue violently surged 149%, and then management raised the full-year guidance another notch. This is not a normal myocardium thickening at a steady pace; it looks more like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—contraction strength is astonishing, but the ventricular wall is getting thicker and thicker. Any insufficient diastolic filling could trigger outflow tract obstruction. The high valuation is that obstruction; orders and revenue must continuously provide enough preload to sustain the current stroke volume.
The problem is, anesthesia has been administered, but cardiopulmonary bypass has not yet been connected. The market has laid the stage for this company with a high multiple valuation, which means every fluctuation in vital signs is monitored with maximum sensitivity. The 93% and 149% are beautiful historical ECGs but do not constitute the predictive curve for the next quarter; the real heart chamber views to be examined intraoperatively by transesophageal echocardiography are Q3 orders, revenue, and true penetration of commercial customers. What needs to be judged now is whether growth has formed an autonomous rhythm or is entirely dependent on the temporary pacing wire of guidance upgrades.
The price plunge is only a surface symptom; fever does not mean the infection focus is here. The real lesion is often hidden downstream in hemodynamics: if the assumed slope given by valuation is higher than the actual slope of business realization, the gap will not tear immediately but will leak like valve regurgitation, quietly siphoning away effective forward blood flow bit by bit. On the surface, blood pressure may still be okay, but tissue perfusion is already deteriorating. By the time the monitor alarms, the intervention window is often missed.
What I want to see is not whether Q3 can simply beat expectations, but whether each stroke volume of growth has an independent contraction source that does not rely on external stimulation. Orders are the end-diastolic volume of the heart, revenue is the ejection fraction, and guidance is the drip rate of postoperative vasoactive drugs. If all three synchronize benignly, the myocardium truly recovers; as long as one depends on medication, this high valuation still lies on the cardiopulmonary bypass machine, not yet off mechanical support, and any time of withdrawal could trigger fatal hypotension.
The intraoperative judgment of Palantir is very clear—the high valuation has already compressed the tolerance margin of the standard procedure to an extremely thin level. If Q3 experiences even one drop in perfusion pressure, it is not just a numerical fluctuation but a beginning of questioning myocardial viability.The market has fallen significantly, and the discussion in my group has become increasingly active. Everyone keeps asking the same question: Is this the right time to buy? But one important signal is still missing: sustained ETF inflows. A one- or two-day rebound is not enough to confirm that real capital is consistently returning. A genuine market recovery needs more than temporary buying pressure. [$BTC] is hovering around $77,500, down more than 4% this week. The recent Binance security incidNo matter how stunning the facade elevation is, it can't fool the rebar inspection device during testing—the 107% revenue growth in data centers is essentially a waterproofing layer on the roof that hasn't undergone a water tightness test yet; it looks shiny but whether it leaks will only be known when the heavy rain comes.
I won't be looking at how dazzling the glass curtain wall looks on AMD's Q3 report. What I want to check is the structural calculation book. The Instinct chip is a prefabricated component, while the Helios rack-level system is the modular core tube of the entire building—the problem is never how pretty the drawings are, but whether the tower crane can precisely hoist the components to the nodes. The deployment demand from cloud giants is the general contractor contract, but the contract amount does not equal the completed floor area; there is an entire construction organization design and implementation capability in between. The Q2 data center revenue doubling year-over-year is equivalent to the topping-out ceremony of the main structure, but after topping out, there are still mechanical and electrical installations, curtain wall closures, and fire inspections; any process delay will push back the delivery schedule.
What really keeps me focused is the load-bearing system's force transmission path. The Helios rack-level integrated solution bundles computing power, interconnection, power supply, and cooling into a single load-bearing unit. The advantage is high overall stiffness and short construction cycles; the downside is that a single point failure will propagate along the node plates. Large-scale deployment by cloud providers means concentrated load application; whether the transfer layer can withstand stress redistribution is the answer I most want to hear at the Q3 call. Revenue is the live load on the floor and can be estimated; gross margin is the concrete grade and cannot be compromised; and order backlog is the foundation pit support—once deformation exceeds limits, the higher you build, the more dangerous it becomes.
As for the market correlation of the US stock token $xIWM, that's another structural logic. The token price corresponds to the building's vibration response—the chip delivery rhythm is the excitation source, and earnings expectations are the damping ratio. The 107% year-over-year growth rate has already pushed the vibration mode to a higher order; any construction deviation will amplify resonance effects, causing volatility to tear a settlement crack. The cloud providers' capital expenditure plan is the geological survey report; the report says the bearing capacity is sufficient, but when piling encounters isolated rocks, the pile length must be adjusted.
My professional habit is: first look at the foundation inspection report, then the facade plan. Whether Helios can convert deployment demand into confirmed revenue depends on the quality of node connections at the delivery end, not the PPT floor height at the release end. The strong growth in data center business must stand on the basis of repeatable construction methods, not one-off showrooms. #amdq3heliosrevenueI have already cut losses
Tonight, watching the liquidation frenzy is getting intense: 158 million liquidated across the entire network in 24 hours, 56,184 people out, and the hardest hit are not the longs but the shorts. BTC liquidated shorts worth 29.54 million in one day, nearly three times the longs at 10.58 million; ETH shorts at 26.99 million versus longs at 10.03 million, shorts are bleeding as well. This drop is not just a fall, it’s clearly a squeeze upwards wearing out the shorts.
In the last hour, the pressure is increasing 🤔: ETH shorts liquidated 3.3 million in one hour, longs only 400,000, an eightfold difference; ZEC shorts 390,000 versus longs 80,000, the short squeeze is accelerating. The more the shorts resist, the more they add to their positions, but each time they get worn down—this is the most tormenting part of a grinding rally.
SOL is an exception 🚨: it liquidated 4.19 million longs in one day, more than twice the shorts at 2.05 million. While others are squeezing shorts, it’s killing longs, indicating its buying power is the weakest among the four coins, no one is catching the rebound, and the longs can’t hold on themselves. I usually don’t take this kind of divergence lightly.
Next, focus on tonight’s 23:00 ISM, expected between 54.5 and 54.7, not yet released. If the data is mild, the squeeze will likely continue, and shorts will keep paying tuition; if the data is hot, the grinding rally will break, and longs chasing today should be careful about being caught in a reversal. My strategy: follow the trend but don’t heavily chase before the data release; for SOL, where longs are self-liquidating, I’ll avoid it first and add positions after the data speaks.Everyone says the US open sets crypto's direction. But the first hour moved the token book, not $BTC.
On OKX, 5 of 23 pairs green, 18 red, $BTC -0.4%. The token book repriced: XTSLA +3.4%.
My read: waiting. Breadth 5/23 means no direction formed. Risk-on off tokenized print is premature.
If the equity-token bid holds, lift $BTC and $ETH, or stay boxed in?
#OKXOrbit #Crypto #TokenizedStocks #MarketOpen
Crypto is high-risk. Personal observation only, not investment advice. DYOR.Late at night, I went through the liquidation list from the beginning. The positions that can hold and those that can't are clearer than during the day. I also double-checked that daytime position; the structure is what we need to focus on tonight.
First, a verified statement: In the large 24-hour order, long and short positions are almost evenly split, with longs at 69.55 million and shorts at 72.65 million. The entire network liquidated 142 million, with 53,781 people out. After the night data, the suspense has been digested once; I won't add any conclusions for it.
The breakdown by coin is as follows: BTC liquidated 37.75 million, ETH 36.63 million, SOL 7.26 million, and ZEC 5.21 million. The first two account for the majority, the latter two are just a fraction. 📊
Looking at the smaller one-hour order, the situation changes completely: the whole network liquidated 2.76 million, with longs accounting for 2.5 million and shorts only 258,000. Almost all short-term forced exits were longs.
Putting the two windows together, the meaning is clear: the one-day order shows balance, the one-hour order shows a short-term one-sided trend. Different windows, conclusions cannot share the same chart. I record them separately by window and do not mix judgments.
By the way, checking some off-exchange matters: The first phase of 15 network withdrawals on a certain exchange has all resumed, including BTC, ETH, SOL, and ZEC. The second phase has no fixed schedule yet; full confirmation is expected to be generated on Tuesday.
The list is here; I'll note it down first, no rush to give direction. I'll cross-check again when the next list comes out. If it matches, I'll act; if not, I'll keep watching empty-handed. 👀$ZEC's market is still consolidating, but the main players on-chain have already started openly accumulating.
A whale took 3,052 ZEC in spot all at once, then immediately placed a low-leverage long position of 8,000 contracts.
Bottom-fishing in spot while simultaneously locking positions in derivatives, the main players' move looks a bit aggressive. Retail investors are still hesitating to exit, but the bulls at this level are holding strong, ready to push prices higher at any moment.
#ZEC
$ZEC
👇An on-chain investigator posted a fund flow path: over $106 million was withdrawn, split, and transferred from multiple centralized exchange accounts within about 24 hours. The public disclosure date is November 2, and the victim is only referred to as "a certain EU entity," with no company name or mention of licensing.
First, let's look at the actions. Around November 1, large withdrawals appeared simultaneously from multiple exchange accounts, denominated in $USDC and $USDT, totaling over $106 million within 24 hours, completing a "de-custody" process.
Why bypass $ETH? USDC and $USDT carry fiat on/off-ramp records, making it easy to trace back to the original accounts; ETH has ready trading pairs on more chains and platforms, making it the best intermediary to open the most exit routes. Therefore, the vast majority of withdrawals eventually converge to "USDC/USDT → ETH," then are sent to exchange venues like WellWallet and Kyrrex for swapping, and directed to new addresses via cross-chain tools. Some reports say part was converted to $XMR through Wagyu, but with only a single source, it can only be marked as "to be verified."
Next is the characterization. No exchange was named, nor did any platform admit to being hacked. Multiple CEX accounts were involved rather than a single login point, so outsiders cannot attribute this to "a certain system being breached," nor can they rule out weak account management.
One question remains: every transaction can be seen on-chain, but seeing does not equal recovering. The security boundary of custodial accounts is ultimately determined by the platform's risk control.#PalantirQ3Valuation
Palantir Q3 drops tonight — the AI valuation test. $2.18B revenue expected (+84% YoY), EPS $0.41 (+95%), Market Cap ∼$447B at ∼89x forward P/E.
US Commercial +149% YoY is driving it, now >40% of mix. But at $184 pre-earnings, even a beat may not be enough — options price 13% move. Watch guidance.
Growth is real, price is premium.
#PalantirQ3Valuation #PLTR #Palantir #AIStocks #Earnings #OKX #OKXOrbit #AITrade #TechStocks #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单
It is highly likely to slightly exceed expectations, but the guidance risk is more worth paying attention to.
Supporting factors: Apple has exceeded EPS expectations for the past eight quarters. This quarter's consensus expects revenue of about $113.4 billion and EPS of about $1.99. Goldman Sachs expects revenue of $113.6 billion and EPS of $2.01, slightly higher than consensus; Jefferies predicts revenue and EPS to exceed consensus by 4% and 5% respectively, based on the logic of an early buying spree for iPhones before the September price increase.
However, the hidden risk lies in: rising memory prices are squeezing gross margins, and Jefferies warns that next quarter's guidance may fall short of expectations due to weaker-than-expected demand for the iPhone 18 Pro and limited upside surprises from the foldable Duo. Exceeding expectations is a "point," but guidance is the "momentum"—a slight beat in performance is easy, but if next quarter's guidance is weak, the market reaction may be negative. #Perspectivas del informe financiero de Palantir: Can high growth sustain the high valuation?
I wouldn't want to talk about Palantir since over time I have stopped seeing it as an evil company that intends to spy on each of us and have started to see its fundamental value.
To answer honestly the question Can high growth sustain the high valuation?
In the long term, growth alone is not enough to maintain a high valuation.Data explodes, stock prices weaken: which signal do you trust?
South Korea's chip exports in October surged 259% year-on-year, reaching $56.4 billion in a single month, with semiconductors almost supporting half of the country's foreign trade. Normally, this should be a signal for the sector's celebration. But the market gave the opposite answer: despite positive news from SNDK, Micron, and Hynix, their stock prices have been continuously weak.
This is not a problem with fundamentals, but the trading rhythm is speaking. Export data is a rearview mirror; stock prices are the early vote. Shortages, price increases, and cycle reversals—if these logics have already been priced in by capital, then subsequent explosive data is merely a window to cash out chips.
The "super cycle" may be real, but "real" does not mean "buy now." A good story and a good buying point are always two different things. Chasing at the top earns emotions but loses principal. When narrative and price conflict, price is more honest—money does not lie.
So the question is simple: do you trust the explosive data, or the falling stock prices? #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 Kenya's "Virtual Asset Service Providers Act" (VASP Act 2025) grants a one-year transition period for crypto companies already in operation, starting from November 4, 2025, expiring this Wednesday (November 4, 2026). After expiration, operating in Kenya or providing virtual asset services to Kenyan users without a license is illegal. According to the law, companies face a maximum fine of 25 million Kenyan shillings; individuals face up to 10 million shillings or imprisonment for up to five years, or both; directors and executives who knowingly authorize such activities are also held accountable. Licensing authorities: divided by business type. The Capital Markets Authority (CMA) oversees exchanges, brokers, investment advisors, asset management, ICOs, and tokenization platforms; the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) oversees custodial wallets, payment processing, and stablecoin issuance. The threshold is high: according to the July 2026 regulations compiled by VASP Tracker, exchanges require a paid-up capital of 100 million shillings; licenses expire annually on December 31 and must be renewed two months in advance. Foreign platforms that actively target Kenyan users or profit from Kenya are also considered to be operating in Kenya and must have a local company, office, bank account, and a CEO residing in Kenya. A key gap: VASP Tracker reports that as of November 2, neither CBK nor CMA has published any VASP license registries. Whether any institutions have actually been approved or if regulation will be delayed remains officially unannounced.$ENA & $HYPE Token Unlocks: Should Investors Be Worried? With the crypto market still recovering from recent security-related shocks, another concern is emerging: upcoming token unlocks. According to third-party tracking platforms, $ENA is approaching a supply-release event on November 5, followed by $HYPE on November 6. However, one important distinction needs to be made: scheduled token unlocks, actual token distribution, and tokens being sold on the open market are three completely differeCrypto Short-Term Observation: Two Scenarios Before Key Resistance
BTC has returned to the 76,000–79,000 range, with short-term focus on 78,800–79,000. If the price can break through and hold above this area, market sentiment is expected to further improve; if repeatedly blocked, it will likely continue range-bound oscillation. Before the non-farm payroll data release, I personally prefer to respond with a range-bound approach to avoid chasing highs and selling lows.
This week, attention should also be paid to the U.S. midterm election results on November 3. If the Republican Party wins comprehensively, risk appetite may temporarily recover, potentially catalyzing BTC to test 79,000–80,000 upward; if the Democratic Party sweeps, it may strengthen the risk of a breakdown and downward movement, so support effectiveness needs to be monitored.
ETH has simultaneously strengthened to around 2,300, with 2,300–2,320 forming short-term resistance above. If it cannot effectively break through, a range-bound strategy of selling high and buying low can still be applied; if it breaks through and stabilizes, then observe whether momentum continues.
Overall, currently at a key resistance test stage, both BTC and ETH need to wait for breakout confirmation. The above is a personal view for reference only.$SOL whale short position holding strong: $123 becomes the liquidation trigger
On the SOL market, a whale is still holding firm. Holding a high-leverage short position of 250,000 SOL, it has given back more than half of its profits within a week and is now relying on the last bit of margin to hold on.
The key price level is glaring: the liquidation price is at $123. At this level, the shorts are no longer calmly positioning but are holding on by force. If the price pulls up even slightly, this massive short position could turn from a profitable trade into prime fuel for a price rally—forced liquidation will trigger passive buying, which in turn pushes the price up.
This makes the market logic subtle: as long as the price doesn't break above, shorts can still drag it down; once it approaches the liquidation line, liquidity can ignite instantly. It all depends on when the market maker decides to pull this liquidation trigger.
For ordinary traders, don’t treat the whale’s liquidation price as a risk-free arbitrage point. Behind high-leverage shorts lie intense volatility; spikes and reverse sweeps may happen first. Watching volume and price reactions around $123 is more practical than guessing when the "pin" will come. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 #Palantir财报前瞻：高增长能否支撑高估值 #Reddit暴跌近30%，AI搜索分流冲击显现 Revenue up 53%, net profit up 74%, stock price dropped 30.44% in one day, caused by a loss of one million clicks per week.
▪️ Q3 revenue 895 million, up 53% year-on-year; net profit 283 million, up 74% year-on-year.
▪️ Global daily active users 130.3 million, flat quarter-on-quarter; US daily active users 50.7 million, down 2% year-on-year.
▪️ Revenue per user $6.87, up 36% year-on-year; US market +53%.
▪️ Q4 guidance $1 billion to $1.03 billion, below the expected $1.05 billion; year-on-year growth rate dropped from 53% to 38%-42%.
▪️ In October, weekly search clicks from Google dropped by more than 1 million.
▪️ Closed at $90.15 on October 31, down 30.44% in one day, down over 60% year-to-date.
▪️ The company plans to change open browsing to login-first, testing outside the US in Q4 first.
▪️ User count not increasing, price per user up 36%, the only upside surprise in Q4 is price per user, and the ceiling for price per user is ad load rate. Grinding for half a day in the first three hours, then changing the results in the last hour. This is especially obvious for ETH this time: the small bullish candles in the front looked quite patient, but in the end, it didn't hold until the four-hour close.
OKX spot, from 23:00 to 00:00 on November 2, BTC closed at 77515.6 USDT, down about 0.45% for the hour; ETH closed at 2273.65, down about 0.80%. This time it's no longer a retracement with another slowly moving.
Breaking down ETH from 20:00 to 24:00: the first three hours still net gained 5.16, the last hour net dropped 18.4, turning the entire four-hour segment into a net loss of 13.25. BTC net dropped 379.1 over the four hours, with the last hour itself net dropping 347.3. This compares the net change between open and close, not representing all intraday fluctuations.
I think this is more worth noting than "another bearish candle": the recovery took time but failed to hold the gains. Both coins also closed below the lowest price of the previous 16:00–20:00 four-hour segment this time, so we can't just brush it off as lingering in the old range.
But a close outside the range once doesn't write the ending for the next segment. If subsequent closes return to that range, the continuity of this weakness will be discounted. For now, just acknowledge this closing candle got worse; don't use the unfinished new candle to overturn it.
The 00:00–01:00 hourly candle and 00:00–04:00 four-hour candle are incomplete. Data as of Beijing time November 3, 00:02. For informational purposes only, not investment advice.#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 Just brewed a strong cup of tea, and looking at this 78% betting Yes on the board, I actually feel a chill down my spine.
[Investment Bank Data and Game Focus]:
Goldman Sachs expects revenue of 113.598 billion, EPS 2.01, gross margin 47.8%, slightly above consensus, but the real key is the next quarter guidance—Goldman itself forecasts F1Q27 gross margin only 46.8%, with all three core indicators below consensus. Morgan Stanley also expects this quarter to basically meet expectations, but next quarter's revenue guidance may only see low to mid single-digit growth, with iPhone revenue and gross margin possibly slightly below sell-side consensus. Bank of America is more conservative, with revenue at 113 billion, EPS 1.97, bluntly stating that the market's revenue expectations for the December quarter are "too high."
[My Judgment]:
78% of people bet revenue will pass, but the real divergence among investment banks lies in gross margin and guidance. Goldman’s gross margin of 47.8% this quarter looks stable, but excluding tariff refunds the core is only 46%-47%, and the pressure from memory costs is just beginning to enter the reports. Meeting this quarter’s targets is not difficult; the challenge is the new CEO’s wording for the December quarter—if revenue beats but guidance is soft, the script will likely resemble SanDisk’s "dead on arrival" scenario.$SNDK
The most awkward moment for tokenized stocks is after the underlying stock market closes.
Tokyo and Seoul have long since closed. On OKX, KIOXIA dropped from 80 to 70.14, down 12%; SNDK fell from 1198 to 1118, hitting the daily low; LITE -12.4%, MRVL -7.6%. On the same storage chain, SKHYNIX is still up +1.5%. The opening prices for tomorrow are now being set by the token market.
SNDK's fundamentals are still solid. OI is $137 million, with turnover more than five times the holdings in one day, and the fee rate is +0.0314%, so the bulls are still paying and not running away. KIOXIA's pool only has $870,000, so a 12% drop is just a matter of a few hundred thousand dollars. With the same bad news, the deeper the pool, the more it can withstand.
I don't see this storage wave collapsing; I’m watching to see who will be the first to fail to support their pool.
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ ① BTC 78,800-81,000 is a resistance zone, do not chase. Only a breakout with volume is a right-side entry; the floor is at 76,000, breaking below looks toward 75,000. The funding rate is above zero, staying steady in the middle.
② Watch ETH at 2,200. The 2,100-2,400 range is a weekly demand zone; if held, the first target is 2,600-2,700. The funding rate has turned negative to -0.0097%, shorts are paying. Long position premise: volume-supported bottom at 2,200 + BTC holding above 78K.
③ Macro anchor unchanged: high probability of rate hikes in December. Bank of America and Fidelity both expect 25bp hikes in December and March next year.
In summary: Fear index at 38, funding rate not negative, ETF inflows absent, whales buying but price not moving — when signals conflict, being out of the market is the best position. $BTC $ETH$BTC is more like a "ballast stone." Once macro interest rate cuts are implemented and incremental funds enter, BTC's siphoning effect and core asset attributes may be further strengthened, making it suitable for base position allocation rather than short-term chasing.
$ETH is about "value replenishment." Layer2 solves scalability but does not fully address mainnet deflation and liquidity issues. If the altcoin season kicks off, ETH's staking yields, Gas consumption, and derivatives depth are expected to improve, with the benefit logic leaning towards fundamental revaluation.
$SOL has the greatest elasticity but also the harshest pullbacks. If it becomes the main battlefield for funds, sentiment may soar first; the mid-term still depends on ecosystem prosperity and on-chain activity. Price pumping does not automatically mean fundamentals improve.
More crucial is market sentiment: large funds set the tone, hot money provides leverage, and retail investors absorb liquidity. If sector rotation (DeFi, Meme, AI) gradually forms, the overall market capitalization may change.
But assumptions are not facts. Macro liquidity easing, sector resonance, and real incremental capital inflows are three hurdles. First look at on-chain data and trading volume before betting; don’t mistake expectations for results, and don’t blindly leverage due to FOMO.
The above is for personal reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Data changes in real time with the market; please refer to the latest data.
#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 BTC's October decline matters, but the sharper warning is the demand backdrop: US spot ETF outflows of $643M on Oct. 30 followed four days of inflows, while the Coinbase premium has remained negative for 38 days. Miner revenue is strong, yet revenue per hashrate fell. That mismatch leaves any recovery dependent on renewed spot buying.
#BTCMarketSignalsDiverge Today I was really stunned by Intel's price movement. Just because the Q4 earnings guidance collapsed, the stock opened and immediately plunged 29%, the largest single-day drop in over fifty years since its listing. It's ridiculous when you think about it — in Q3 it actually exceeded expectations, with revenue of 16.5 billion, up 21% year-over-year, and the data center AI business surged nearly 80%. But the Q4 outlook completely blew up. $BTC
The revenue guidance of 15-16 billion is nearly 1.6 billion less than the market's general expectation of 17 billion, earnings per share were cut in half, and even gross margin dropped by 6 percentage points. On one hand, the Israeli factory explosion caused a shutdown, resulting in a 300 million revenue loss in a single quarter, with the impact expected to continue into Q1 next year; on the other hand, PC demand is really weak, client business is still declining year-over-year, and even the CEO came out saying the storage chip price increase issue will persist until 2027. The entire Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropped 7 points that day, Qualcomm and AMD also crashed, and even Nvidia couldn't hold up. $ETH
Speaking of which, my ETH long position also got unlucky. I opened a 100x full position at 2331, originally thinking that after such a big drop, it would at least bounce back a bit to let me get out.
The order book shows 90% of buy orders hanging at the bottom, all low-priced support orders, with very few actually daring to take orders upward. The forced liquidation price is over 900, far enough away, so it hasn't exploded yet. It's just hanging there in limbo, more tormenting than a direct crash to the bottom.
Tech stocks were supposed to be more stable, risk appetite could have recovered a bit, but now with the big blue chips collapsing like this, the whole market is waiting for the Fed's statement tonight.Palantir closed at 184.11 last Friday, down 6.3% in one day. This is 11.9% below the all-time high close on October 9. But counting from the last earnings report, it has still risen 46.5%. It will release its Q3 earnings after the U.S. market closes today, around 5 a.m. Beijing time tomorrow morning, with a conference call at 6 a.m. Whether it beats expectations or not, I don't see much of an issue. Wall Street estimates adjusted EPS at $0.41. Palantir has not missed expectations in the past 8 quarters; revenue has exceeded its own guidance upper limit every quarter by at least 2.5%. I estimate this time the reported EPS will be between $0.43 and $0.46. But what I care more about is another figure. Earnings Whispers gave a whisper number of $0.49 on October 26. This is considered the market's private expectation, significantly higher than Wall Street's. Last quarter it delivered $0.41, 6 cents above expectations, and the stock rose 29.5% the next day. If this quarter is only slightly above $0.41, I don't think it's enough. For Palantir, beating expectations does not necessarily mean a price increase. In the past 8 earnings reports, the stock rose 5 times and fell 3 times the next day, with an average move of 14.8%. In the 3 down days, revenue still beat expectations. In November 2025, revenue exceeded its own guidance upper limit by 8.7%, yet the stock fell 7.9% the next day. This time I am focusing on U.S. commercial revenue. Last quarter it grew 149%, and Wall Street estimates 13 this quarter If compliant perpetual contracts open up: BTC stabilizes, ETH fills scenarios, SOL bets on elasticity
If the US compliant perpetual contracts advance, the benefit paths are not the same.
$BTC is more like a "ballast stone." Once institutions gain more convenient trading and hedging tools, BTC's liquidity premium and reserve asset attributes may be repriced, suitable for mid-term observation rather than short-term chasing.
ETH looks at "channel filling." ETFs solve allocation needs but do not fully cover leveraged trading scenarios. If compliant perpetuals are implemented, ETH's funding rates, derivatives depth, and liquidity are expected to improve, with a benefit logic leaning structural.
SOL has the greatest elasticity but also the greatest uncertainty. If it enters the compliant derivatives pool, sentiment may move first; the mid-term still depends on the ecosystem and regulatory definition. Opening trading channels does not automatically mean fundamentals improve.
More crucial is the market infrastructure: ICE handles clearing, Trade.xyz provides products, and trading platforms onboard users. If this framework gradually gets approved, the US crypto derivatives landscape may change.
But assumptions are not facts. Approval, product launch, and real capital inflow are three hurdles. First watch regulatory progress and trading volume before betting; don't mistake expectations for results, and don't blindly leverage because of expectations.$ZEC Direction: Short
· Entry: Short when the rebound is resisted around 1265 - 1275.
· Stop Loss: Firm stop loss if it breaks above 1285 (above previous high).
· Take Profit: First target 1210 (near previous low), second target 1200.
⚠️ Note: Overall, it is in a wide-range oscillation and pullback phase after a surge, with obvious resistance above. MACD momentum above zero line is weakening and facing a death cross. Do not short directly; wait for rebound confirmation of resistance, use light positions with stop loss.$3.64 billion net outflow, BTC moved only 0.56% in 24 hours. This contrast is quite strange.
After Binance resumed withdrawals in phases, about $4.65 billion was withdrawn, about $1.01 billion was deposited, net outflow $3.64 billion; that gap of about $6.3 billion, according to CoinDesk, has been replenished by about 95%. The numbers are huge, my first reaction was that the market would shake, but BTC opened 24h at 77,996.3, now 77,561, highest 78,866.5, lowest 77,280.7, amplitude 2.03%, it shook a bit but didn’t continue to crash 🙂
BNB is more straightforward, 702.02, down 1.76%, high and low just between 716.1 and 700.36, also no collapse. Money is flowing out, but prices are not panicking, these two things together are the most interesting part today.
I’m guessing two explanations, not necessarily correct: one is that the large outflow itself is a byproduct of "withdrawal resumption," money leaves only because it can be withdrawn, not because it’s scared away; two is that there’s no new narrative these days, sellers can’t find a reason to accelerate. I lean toward the first, maybe just comforting myself.
So I want to ask: do you see this $3.64 billion as a "normal relocation at the end of the event," or a "slow jog of belated realization"? #BTC持续承压，资金与市场走势出现分歧 $BTC $BNB $ETH ETH Midterm Election Day: Whales Buy 63 Million vs 430 Million ETF Outflows
Today is the US midterm election, and crypto market volatility traditionally amplifies on election day. ETH is right in the middle of a tug-of-war between bulls and bears.
Whale Signal: On November 2, a giant whale bought 27,553 ETH in 5 hours, spending 63 million at an average price of 2,286, marking the largest single on-chain purchase since the Binance incident.
Institutional Opposite: In the last week of October, ETFs saw net outflows of 431 million, with BlackRock alone withdrawing 76.6 million in a single day. Coinbase discount hit -0.21, the deepest since FTX.
Whales bottom-fishing + institutional flight, this divergence historically appears around phase bottoms. 2,300 is the key level; holding above it targets 2,400, while breaking below 2,250 tests 2,150.
Maintain position flexibility before election results are announced. #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ After the midterm elections settle, uncertainty decreases, and risk appetite in the US stock market recovers, which will first influence sentiment toward BTC and ETH. Historical data shows that in the 12 months following elections, the S&P 500 typically gains between 14% and 15%. During this risk appetite recovery phase, the crypto market usually gets a share. $BTC $ETH $SNDK However, the correlation dynamics have changed. From 2025 to 2026, the correlation between BTC and Nasdaq fluctuates greatly, sometimes reaching as high as 0.8, other times dropping near zero, even decoupling temporarily. Therefore, the old logic of "when US stocks rise, crypto must rise" no longer applies. US Treasury yields are the more fundamental variable. In 2026, the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and the 10-year US Treasury real yield has surpassed 0.6, a historical high. This means the direction of Treasury yields influences crypto prices more than the Nasdaq does. If Treasury yields strengthen again, both tech stocks and the crypto market will need to be repriced. Specifically for trading, watch several signals closely: First, whether US tech stocks can stabilize and rebound. Last Friday, the Nasdaq fell 2.86%, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 7.2%. If they recover this week, risk appetite returning will benefit Bitcoin and Ethereum. Second, whether Treasury yields can continue to decline. Treasury buyback operations and refinancing announcements are key points; falling yields are positive for non-yielding assets. Third, ETF fund flows. Last week, BTC and ETH spot ETFs both saw outflows. If funds flow back in net after the election, that will be a true sign of strengthening. Fourth, BTC’s own position. 78,000 is a short-term critical level. US Midterm Elections: 3 Key Things to Watch
1. Congress Control: House likely turns Democrat; Senate remains uncertain. A divided Congress could mean policy gridlock and market volatility.
2. Crypto Regulation: Republican control may support crypto legislation and $BTC /ETH sentiment. A Democratic sweep could increase regulatory pressure, especially on altcoins.
3. $BTC & ETH Positioning: $BTC remains a long-term liquidity and fiat-distrust play.
#USMidtermsPolicyOutlook 🚨 Hacker-Linked Wallet Makes a Massive $65.61 Million $ETH Purchase! According to blockchain investigator ZachXBT, the wallet that purchased approximately 28,603 $ETH worth $65.61 million today is reportedly connected to a hacker. This unexpected discovery has raised fresh concerns across the crypto community, especially given the unusual movement of large amounts of capital into Ethereum. What's even more interesting is that just yesterday, an EU-based entity reportedly experienced the withd$NEAR Bearish: Fell below the $4 mark, with a cumulative three-week pullback of 32%
OKEx current price 4.008, down 7.39% in 24h, trading volume $23.91 million, ranking first in the decline list
The biggest risk lies in leverage, NEAR contract positions about $856 million, 24h liquidation 2.83 million, of which longs account for 2.46 million, about 87%
Long accounts still account for about 61%, long-short ratio 1.56, when the price goes down these long positions become passive sell orders, liquidation concentrated around 4.02, current price has already hit it
NEAR doubled in one month in October, now down 32% in three weeks, the support between 4.30 and 4.60 has been lost, the next reference point is near the October 30 low of 3.90
Bitwise's NEAR ETF and Grayscale trust conversion are still progressing, but short-term cannot withstand the selling pressure from leverage liquidation.Apple closed at 348.91 last Thursday, its highest closing price in history. On Friday, the Nasdaq plunged, but Apple only fell 1.2%, closing at 344.63. Many people see it as a place to avoid the AI pullback. So far this year, Apple has risen 26.8%. After the U.S. market closes today, it will release its Q4 earnings report, around 5:30 a.m. Beijing time tomorrow morning, with a conference call at 6 a.m. This is also the first conference call held by Ternus as CEO since taking over in September. Whether it beats expectations or not, I lean toward it beating, but the surplus is not as much as people think. The current consensus on Seeking Alpha is $1.99 per share. Roughly calculated from the midpoint of the guidance given in July, it’s about 1.98, so Apple needs to do a little better than its own guidance. It has beaten Wall Street expectations for 14 consecutive quarters, with the smallest beat being 1.9%. But this quarter, iPhone, Mac, and iPad are all constrained by supply, so revenue is unlikely to exceed expectations as much as in previous quarters. I estimate the announced figure will be between 2.00 and 2.05. However, for Apple, beating expectations and the stock rising the next day are two different things. On July 30, earnings per share were $2.02, $0.13 more than Wall Street’s estimate, but the stock price actually fell 7.4% the next day. In fact, $0.11 of that $0.13 was a one-time tariff refund, so excluding that, it was only $0.02 more. Also, before that earnings report, Apple closed on July 29 at After the data release, the market showed clear divergence: ISM remains in the expansion range, but the price index fell back, and construction spending was far below expectations.
My view is: the economy has not stalled for the time being, but inflationary pressure has eased, and no conclusion can be easily drawn about the short-term direction.
Looking at the crypto market, BTC is oscillating around 77962, ETH is relatively strong, SOL still appears weak, and ZEC stands out. Holdings of the four major coins increased simultaneously, but price trends are not synchronized, indicating that capital inflow does not mean bulls have taken control.
Next, focus on whether BTC can hold 77962. Consider light entry if it stabilizes above this level; pause plans if it breaks below, no chasing orders, no forced holding.
The more divergent the market, the more you need to control your position size. Opportunities can wait, but capital cannot be gambled.🛡️
#USMidtermsPolicyOutlook BTC fell back to 77,000, ETH reversed to green against the trend, DOGE lost 0.075. The price changes of the three coins are only slight, but the underlying capital attitudes are completely different.
Latest news, Reuters reported that after the Binance security incident, customers have withdrawn about $3.64 billion, accounting for about 2.1% of the platform's assets. Although funds have flowed out, it has not yet evolved into a market-wide panic. The real test is whether confidence can continue to recover.
$BTC is about $77,462, down 0.67% in 24 hours. 78,000 has been lost again, with 78,500 above as an observation point and 77,000 below still an important defense line. The price repeatedly contests, indicating that funds have not yet formed a unified direction.
$ETH is about $2,271, up 0.16%. It performs stronger than BTC, but 2,300 has not yet been reclaimed. 2,250 is a short-term observation line; if broken, attention should return to 2,200.
$DOGE is about $0.07496, down 0.96%. 0.075 has already been lost. The latest fund statistics show that DOGE-related products had zero net inflow in the most recent trading day, with no obvious increase in funds so far. Below, watch 0.073; above, first see if 0.076 can be reclaimed.
In short: BTC is fighting for support, ETH maintains structure through relative strength, but DOGE lacks clear new buying. Price stabilization does not mean funds have returned.
#Palantir财报前瞻：高增长能否支撑高估值