Orbit Post Sitemap
$BTC 24h net inflow of 230 million, $ETH 24h net inflow of 53.7306 million; but weekly BTC net outflow of 543 million, ETH net outflow of 217 million, 15-day BTC net outflow of 802 million, ETH net outflow of 128 million, indicating only short-term capital replenishment, long-term capital has not entered.
Key resistance for BTC is 78400, for ETH is 2335, these two resistance levels will determine the quality of this rebound.
This is a resonance repair market, do not blindly chase highs as a trend reversal, risk control is a priority.
⚠️ Market observation only, does not constitute trading advice.There has always been a saying: Bitcoin is digital gold. Fine, today gold rose by 2.79%, quickly reaching $4040 per ounce. I want to ask—what is the digital one doing?
I'm not trying to argue, I'm genuinely a bit confused. Every time gold moves, someone in the circle brings up this saying, claiming money will eventually flow in; but when gold jumps nearly three points in a single day, the excitement is still all about gold itself.
So my mindset has changed: whether $BTC is digital gold might not be that important; what matters is whether it was bought today as a safe haven. These two are very different.
Anyway, I've learned that when others shout narratives, don't get excited first—see where the money is actually going.The early session once dropped to about 75,700, then rebounded in a V-shape within a few hours to about 78,300 — the price first turned red, but the fear index remained at 34.
With election uncertainty settled, BTC wiped out its losses; on the options side, about $420 million in calls were bought, indicating some are betting on a rebound.
However, the spot ETF saw about a billion outflow in the first two days of the month, and Coinbase's premium is relatively weak — institutional channels are still selling.
A quick rebound ≠ trend confirmation. It looks more like a "short squeeze/uncertainty elimination" repair, not a large capital inflow.
Three steps to follow before chasing:
1) First see if it can hold above 78,000; losing that would mean a false breakout.
2) Then watch if the ETF shifts from net outflow to continuous net inflow.
3) The fear index rising from 34 and whether call buying can continue — otherwise, just treat it as a pullback.
Do you trust a V-shaped recovery more, or wait for capital confirmation before acting?
$BTC #ETF #FearIndex#全球央行Q3购金321吨，金价为何持续承压？
This wave of gold rally is essentially driven by both "risk aversion + opportunity cost." On the afternoon of November 4, spot gold broke through $4000, with a daily increase of over 2%, and the main contract of Shanghai gold also strengthened simultaneously. On the news front, the expectation of the Democratic Party regaining control of Congress brings policy uncertainty, leading funds to shift to safe-haven assets. U.S. Treasury yields declined, and the dollar fell to its lowest point since late September, directly opening space for gold prices. Structural support comes from central bank gold purchases: in Q3, global central banks net increased holdings by 321 tons, a 42% year-on-year increase. Risks are also clear: JOLTS job openings exceeded expectations, and the probability of a rate hike in December is priced at about 80%, which suppresses gold prices. Moreover, gold prices just rebounded from around $3870 at the end of October, with extreme volatility. Allocation is acceptable, but chasing the rally requires caution. $XAU $BTC $ETH Today there is a striking number: spot gold broke through $4040 per ounce, with an intraday increase of 2.79%.
First, distinguish the two numbers. 4040 is the price level, 2.79% is the intraday increase — the latter is the key point. Nearly 2.8% in a single day is not a small move for gold of this scale. What it indicates is not "gold is bullish in the long term," but that on this day a considerable amount of money made the same decision at the same time: to move their funds elsewhere.
Where did that money come from? The data doesn’t provide an answer. But from the market behavior, one feature is clear — this is a single-point breakout, not a gradual rise. Slow growth is allocation; fast growth is risk aversion. The former can wait, the latter cannot.
This raises a question: $BTC has been called "digital gold" for so many years, so why doesn’t it get the same buying interest at moments like this? Gold’s risk-hedging attribute is a consensus built over thousands of years, no explanation needed; $BTC’s needs to be proven every time, depending on liquidity and leverage structure at that moment. Riskier assets like $ETH and $SOL are even less likely to be chosen.
So my judgment is: don’t directly translate this gold bullish candle as "positive for crypto." It’s more likely a reallocation of risk budget — survival first, then talk about returns. Whether the money comes back depends on whether it buys $BTC or something else when it returns.
A question to leave: if the next risk-off event still sends money first to gold, how much real support remains for the "digital gold" narrative?【$70 Billion Order Only Delivered 1%, China's AI Computing Power Gap Larger Than Expected】
Chinese companies like Alibaba, Tencent, and ByteDance have ordered about 6 million NVIDIA RTX PRO 5500 cards. At approximately $11,400 per card, the potential order value is around $68.4 billion, but only about 1% is expected to be delivered in the next four months. This is not due to insufficient demand; rather, the computing power shortage is so severe that even workstation graphics cards with performance lower than the H200 and B300 have become scarce.
NVIDIA $NVDA also plans to prioritize TSMC's capacity for the more profitable Rubin platform. The global production of RTX PRO 5500 is expected to be only about 3 million units by 2027. Even if Chinese customers queue up, it will be difficult to secure enough supply.
For NVIDIA, this validates demand but does not immediately translate into $70 billion in revenue; for domestic chip manufacturers, it represents a window of opportunity. Huawei itself admits that production capacity cannot meet domestic demand, and in the short term, the truly scarce resource is deliverable computing power.I saw the withdrawal, and my first reaction was not negative news, but that the fund allocation is being rolled back for now. The biggest fear when writing code is rushing to launch before the requirements have been reviewed.💻
The input this time is: The Zcash Community Grant Committee (ZCG) will no longer advance the proposal submitted on October 29, which originally planned to allocate about 98,000 $ZEC for future mining rewards. Subsequent fund arrangements will be decided through the existing governance process.
My judgment is that this is a plus programmatically, but the incentive issue remains unresolved. On one hand, the committee treasury is sufficient to support expenditures for many years, providing room to clarify the allocation rules; on the other hand, withdrawal does not mean there is already an alternative plan for miner incentives, so governance actions should not be directly interpreted as network security improvements.
A potential bug is conflating "enough money" with "how to allocate it" as one requirement. If it were me, I would require subsequent proposals to clearly specify the source of funds and the trade-offs between grants and miner rewards. Could everyone help me review: when going through the governance process, which allocation rule should be clarified first? NEAR reduces issuance, but staking yield also decreases accordingly.
NEAR Governance approved a proposal to lower the annual issuance cap from 2.5% to 1.6%.
The allocation ratio remains unchanged: 90% for stakers, 10% for the treasury.
However, the aggregate staking yield is expected to drop from 5.268% to 3.372%, while validator commission income also faces pressure.
This is a balancing act between reducing inflation and maintaining staking incentives.
Better tokenomics for holders does not necessarily mean all network participants benefit.So rather than guessing who will come to rescue the market, it's better to first ask: where is the money coming from? $BTC $ETH $SNDK The volume of this current rebound is indeed insufficient. Wednesday just passed, and Friday's non-farm payrolls are about to be released. The market is still digesting the election results, so don't rush to chase the highs. Historically, one to two months after the midterm elections, there is often a more comfortable window for positioning. The real short-term focus should be on Friday's October non-farm payrolls. The market expects new jobs to increase by about 55,000 to 65,000, with the unemployment rate holding at 4.2%. September only saw 29,000 new jobs, and the unemployment rate has already risen to 4.2%, so this data will directly affect the market's judgment on the Fed's actions in December. The market is currently not worried about an immediate rate cut, but about how long high interest rates will have to be endured. CME futures previously showed about a 70% chance of a rate hike in December, indicating that rate cut expectations have not truly returned. If employment continues to weaken on Friday and financial pressure increases, the Fed will have more room to adjust policy later. For the crypto space, BTC is most sensitive to liquidity expectations. Often, prices trade rate cut or easing expectations before funds actually come in. Conversely, if employment data is strong and rate hike expectations rise again, short-term volatility will not be small. So the approach remains the same: do not blindly chase rebounds in the short term, focus on Friday's non-farm payrolls. The best opportunities often appear before everyone has reacted. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 【$BTC rebound target points to 82600, reclaiming 80,000 is the key node】
The path given by Yilihua is to first rebound from around 75700, test the upper channel at 82600, and then judge the next step based on the breakthrough situation. This set of ideas has technical logic: there is indeed obvious support around 75700, but 82600 is still about 6% away from the current price, so the target should not be treated as a guaranteed point.
On November 4 intraday, $BTC once touched around 78400, and the low point of 75700 was temporarily held. The spot Bitcoin ETF has had net outflows for three consecutive trading days, totaling about 1.157 billion, and institutional funds have not yet turned back to net buying.
The US midterm election results pushed the US dollar index down to a one-month low, and the 10-year US Treasury yield also fell back to around 4.92%, providing breathing room for risk assets. BTC's rebound despite continuous ETF outflows indicates there is indeed support near 75700, but this is not enough to prove a trend reversal.
I think the rebound will continue; the first hurdle is 78000–78400, and after stabilizing there, then look at 80,000 and 82600. If ETF funds continue to flow out and US market sentiment weakens again, 82600 is more likely to become a resistance level for the rebound rather than the starting point of a new round of rise. Yilihua's judgment is worth referencing, but the real confirmation signal is still price breakthrough and capital inflow.Low volume market preemptive move, first arrange the "seating order" (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
Midterm election vote counting is rolling out, Democrats temporarily leading. The market is low volume, guessing direction is no longer profitable, how to allocate positions is the real dividing line. The three brothers re-rank:
$BTC — Ballast stone: 24-hour low volume grinding between 76387—78064, only 10516 coins traded, fear of greed 34. Sentiment warms but funds are not rushing to add; 60% base position held down, remaining bullets waiting for election negative news to drop before moving (:з」∠)
$ETH — Elastic position: ETH/BTC rises to 0.0294, stronger than BTC in a single day. Staking queue blocked, exit queue empty, chips locked, suitable for offensive elastic positions ٩(ˊᗜˋ*)و
$ZEC — Independent defense line: Retraced to 1250 but still holding 1200, governance turmoil caused nearly 100,000 coins to exit free circulation, supply shrinks. 1200 is the lifeline, no break no move 🐢
In a low volume market, don’t rush to bet on the strong to take off immediately, first defend against the weak falling further is the discipline. Base, elastic, defense each in their place: BTC holds the line, ETH charges, ZEC defends. Next, trade less, wait more for signals, let time slowly ferment (￣▽￣)ノ
#美国中期选举进入计票阶段，国会控制权将如何变化？ At 4 PM, the phones of the traders watching the market must be buzzing.
BTC has reversed sharply from the low of 75,754, now standing above 78,249. In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidated 338 million, with long positions liquidated at 265 million. The price has recovered, but the long positions have not.
ETH is at 2,297, and SOL is the worst off at only 89.98.
Anomaly: BTC long-short ratio is 2.59, and the funding rate remains positive. This indicates that longs have taken a hit but no one has conceded yet; they are still holding on hard.
Practical strategy:
🔸 BTC: Current price 78,200, resistance at 78,278—only above this can we look for an upward move; support at 76,500 must hold for short-term longs to be logical, if broken look at 75,754.
🔸 ETH: Current price 2,297, heavy resistance at 2,300; if support at 2,229 breaks, expect a drop to 2,200.
🔸 SOL: Current price 89.98, rebound faces resistance at 92–93, try shorting there, defend at 94.5, target 88.
Summary: Leverage hasn't been fully cleared. Keep a close eye on BTC's 76,500 and ETH's 2,229; if broken, the V-shaped rebound is a fakeout. Are you currently long or short? Report your entry points in the comments, and I'll help assess the risk.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Here's something I didn't understand at first: Anthropic hasn't gone public yet, there are no stocks, but the pre-market contracts have already started to fall.
On November 2, it submitted a revised registration document showing Q3 revenue of $16.96 billion, a nearly 47% quarter-over-quarter increase—numbers that are explosive no matter where you put them. Yet by 2:00 PM on November 3, the $ANTHROPIC perpetual pre-market contracts in three market samples had dropped between 4.20% and 4.86%. The better the earnings report, the more the price fell—I watched for a while.
Then I realized, what people are buying isn't the revenue, but how much others are willing to pay in the future. No matter how good the revenue is, it's already happened; how much computing power will be spent and how fast costs will rise is what no one dares to bet on. $BTC rebounded from 75,690 in a deep V to 78,367, this surge really washed out quite a few people.
This roughly 3.5% explosive rebound from the low point is mainly the result of macro uncertainty settling (all bad news out), a surge in bullish bets on derivatives, and a severe technical oversold convergence.
· The bad news from the US midterm elections "boot drop" is all out: Previously, the market worried that the Democrats fully controlling both houses of Congress might hinder crypto-friendly policies. BTC was once smashed below $76,000, dipping to a seven-week low of 75,690; but Democratic control of Congress also means extreme radical policies are unlikely to be easily implemented. Coupled with the clear election results, the accumulated worries were quickly released, and risk capital flowed back.
· Derivatives short squeeze in the options market: When the 15-minute chart formed a bottom, a huge influx of bullish capital appeared in the traditional options market. On that day, BTC options block trades exceeded $660 million, with bullish option purchases reaching a nominal amount of $420 million. Traders heavily bet on the rebound, providing strong fuel for the price rally.
· US stock risk appetite recovery and oversold correction: AI semiconductor stocks (such as AMD, SMCI) led the tech sector strongly, boosting sentiment. After BTC broke the key daily support, the stochastic indicator entered an extremely oversold zone, and the technical rebound attracted rapid capital replenishment.
However, the current 5-minute long-short account ratio shows bulls still account for as high as 65.1% (long-short ratio 1.87), retail chasing momentum is very crowded, and short-term upside still faces pressure. Anthropic is not yet public, and its financial report was just released, but the pre-market contracts fell first. On October 26, it submitted its IPO registration documents to the SEC, planning to list ANT on Nasdaq; on November 2, it filed an amended S-1/A, reporting Q3 revenue of about $16.96 billion, a nearly 47% quarter-over-quarter increase. The numbers look good, but as of 14:00 on November 3, the $ANTHROPIC pre-market perpetual contracts in three major sample markets fell between 4.20% and 4.86%, only rebounding temporarily during intraday trading on November 4.
Why did the same growth data lead to two different directions? Because pre-market contract trading is not about revenue, but valuation expectations. The 47% revenue growth had already been priced in before the disclosure; the release just turned expectations into facts and did not generate new buying. What was truly recalculated was the other side: computing power investment, cost growth, and capital expenditure commitments. If investments grow faster than revenue, valuations have to be adjusted downward.
Mechanically, Pre-IPO perpetual contracts and stocks are two different things. They do not provide equity, voting rights, dividends, nor do they promise stock conversion. Without continuous quotes of the underlying stock, prices overreact to disclosures, financing news, and liquidity.
I tend to view this round of decline as a repricing, not a crash. The 4.20%–4.86% drop is the range of declines in three sample markets, not the average across all platforms. One question remains: with the best financial report leading to contract declines, is the pricing really about how much it’s worth, or how long others are willing to hold it? The toughest bull, Brother 800, has been holding firm against a month of sharp declines, and is finally heading towards victory. Is it going to win? 😭
$SOXL Brother 800 bought the dip again at 68, after dropping from the golden low of 120 to the diamond low of 100. Seven entries and seven exits, closing positions, getting frustrated, but never afraid. Now it’s finally moving towards victory, doubling in one day.
First, looking at the events: Democrats swept both chambers, and they are set to restrict AI development. Increased chances of security reviews, data center energy consumption controls, and antitrust investigations. Cloud providers’ capital expenditure pace may slow, and semiconductor valuations face short-term pressure. But Trump’s veto power remains, making aggressive legislation hard to pass. The industry cycle won’t be broken, just the slope will flatten. A strong bullish candle with volume, and then sentiment recovery. The market returns, and the bull comeback is fast.
On the macro side, it’s actually positive: fiscal expansion is limited → long-term US Treasury yields fall, giving high-valuation tech stocks a bit of breathing room.
On the chart, it rebounded from 67.5 to 73, which is just an oversold correction. Moving averages are all pressing from above, so don’t chase the rally. Those out of the market should judge for themselves. When a strong bullish candle with volume appears and sentiment recovers, consider going long. Bulls earn space, bears save time. Don’t rush.#BTC spot ETF capital outflow, corporate treasuries slow down accumulation
"ETF outflow of one billion, corporate treasuries slow down BTC buying"
US spot BTC ETFs had a net outflow of $1.042 billion over two days, with total net assets dropping to $98.1 billion.
Corporate treasuries' accumulation has clearly slowed. Strategy spent $65.5 million to buy 811 BTC and repurchased $208 million in preferred shares; Strive issued 15% high-yield shares but only bought 124 BTC.
BTC fluctuated between $77,000 and $80,000, and the outlook depends on how long high-interest borrowing to buy coins can last. $BTC #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Intuitively, people would say: once uncertainty disappears, the money should rush back. I don't quite agree; this wave feels more like a "discount correction" rather than "new money coming in."
According to public reports, BTC made a V-shaped recovery from below 76k a few days ago. The suspense around the midterm elections has dissipated, and the market has returned to around 78k. On the OKX spot side, BTC-USDT is currently at 78454.9, climbing from a 24-hour low of 75734.5 to a high of 78520.4, up about 2.37%, with a volatility of 3.64%. The highest point is almost the current price, indicating that after the rise, no one is rushing to sell. ETH also rose by 2.85%.
On the other hand, public data shows that the US spot BTC ETF still had a net outflow of about 115.6 million USD, marking the third consecutive day of outflow, though the outflow has clearly narrowed compared to previous days. IBIT saw an outflow of about 95 million. So my view is: this wave is a risk premium retracement combined with a short squeeze, not an indication that ETF funds have turned around to buy back. Correction and inflow are two different things.
To joke about myself, I always read "narrowing" as "turning positive" and then get proven wrong. This time, I won't be optimistic first.
A specific question: if the ETF is still red tomorrow but the outflow continues to narrow, do you think BTC can hold 78k, or will it go back to test 76k again? #BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓 $BTC $ETH XGOOGL reported at $280.87, slightly up 0.05%, with a daily volume of $10.16 million but showing zero market capitalization—this is not a data error, but a typical portrayal of a synthetic asset that "has value but no market." Smart money is net short with zero holdings, zero social media buzz, and liquidity entirely dependent on one-sided quotes from market makers; retail investors entering the market effectively become the counterparty liquidity providers.
The pricing of synthetic stock tokens is anchored to pre-market and after-hours US stock quotes, but the on-chain liquidity pool depth is insufficient to handle single orders exceeding millions of dollars, with slippage costs effectively eroding arbitrage opportunities. Currently, US stocks are in a volatile earnings season, with Google’s intraday price swings often exceeding 1.5%, while the XGOOGL on-chain price spread typically lags by 15-30 minutes, leaving the arbitrage window only to market makers. More critically, regulatory compliance costs and custody risks cause institutional market makers to continuously reduce their quoting scale, and liquidity exhaustion risks could trigger de-pegging at any time.
Core judgment: XGOOGL is only suitable as an observation window during US stock market off-hours; actual trading costs and tail risks make it lose allocation value. It is recommended to directly allocate to US stock ETFs or option portfolios to obtain a purer Beta.$CORE CORE This chain is now completely running scripts in idle.
There were 34,000 transactions on-chain in a single day, but checking the DEX, the actual trading volume is less than $150.
The entire market doesn't even have a thousand yuan worth of liquidity in a day.
Looking at the buy orders, it's all empty below.
If a real sell pressure of a few hundred dollars comes down, it's a bottomless pit.
Relying on a few bots to fake trades to keep it alive, the chain is alive but the coin is already dead.
#CORE
$CORE
👇The $UNI exchange was hacked and 7.02 million UNI were drained, but the dumping drama has actually already played out.
The hacker cleared out the tokens long ago at an average price of 5.65, and the spot was directly absorbed by the market.
The most telling sign is that the exchange still hasn't allowed withdrawals, indicating that their spot reserves are simply insufficient to cover the deductions.
After the hacker dumped, they left a big mess behind.
If the exchange wants to resume withdrawals later, they will have to pay out of pocket to buy spot tokens on the secondary market to fill the gap.
This effectively forces the exchange to become the largest obvious long position on the order book.
This recent rally is basically a bet on when the exchange will start buying on the order book to reclaim tokens.
#UNI
$UNI
👇🚨 Does the $SNDK crash mean the AI storage market is over? On the contrary, what really deserves attention is that the company's performance is still accelerating!
After the recent earnings report, the stock price sharply pulled back, causing many late investors to panic. But let's first look at the fundamentals: SanDisk's latest quarterly revenue reached $11.031 billion, a year-over-year increase of 378%; data center revenue reached $4.802 billion, a quarter-over-quarter increase of 61%. This shows that AI storage demand is truly reflected in the performance!
📌 First, AI storage is just entering a critical stage!
AI inference requires massive data reading and storage, and the importance of enterprise SSDs and NAND flash continues to rise. It is expected that by 2030, the enterprise data center flash market will reach 1.2 ZB, and the future demand potential remains promising.
📌 Second, long-term orders provide performance assurance!
The company has signed long-term business agreements with 8 customers, covering about half of the flash shipments for fiscal year 2027 and about two-thirds of the shipments for fiscal year 2028. Next quarter's revenue guidance even reaches $12.2 billion to $12.6 billion, indicating strong growth momentum.
📌 Third, what should we focus on during the pullback?
The market worries about a storage industry cycle reversal, excessive prior gains, and slowing growth, so the crash cannot simply be taken as a buy-the-dip signal. The key points to watch next are NAND prices, enterprise SSD orders, and whether the stock price can stabilize again.
AI handles computation, storage handles data. As long as data centers continue to expand, there is an opportunity to keep benefiting! After the Democratic Party's landslide victory, the hardest logic for AI has changed
Stop focusing only on AI chips. The real silent profit-makers are those who "power" and "cool" AI.
With the Democrats taking both houses, regulatory pressure on AI computing power expansion has shifted from "possible" to "real." But note: federal bans are all talk and little action, Trump's veto power still exists; the real gatekeepers are governors and local public utility commissions—new governors in Texas and Georgia have both called for "pausing data center approvals."
Therefore, the beneficiary logic is not "AI itself," but: who solves the two regulatory concerns—power and cooling.
Comprehensive Ranking
1. Bloom Energy ($BE) — Off-grid power, the purest safe haven
Barclays upgraded to overweight the day after the election, customer deposits surged from $78 million to $661 million. The demand inflection point is steeper than expected, up about 146% since 2026. The latest catalyst with the steepest elasticity.
2. GE Vernova ($GEV) — The core player addressing power bottlenecks
Backlog of $76 billion, roughly equal to two years of sales. Gas turbines + grid equipment, the key path for data centers to bypass the public grid. Highest visibility, slightly less elastic.
3. Vertiv — Liquid cooling necessity, the stricter the regulation, the stronger the demand
Single cabinet power surges to 20–100kW, air cooling is physically dead. Deeply tied to Nvidia's liquid cooling solutions. The logic is most direct, but with a 37x forward PE, paying a premium for certainty. $BTC The shoe has finally dropped, with the Democratic Party taking control of both chambers of Congress, directly breaking the White House and Congress's one-party dominance. Subsequently, the Trump administration's fiscal, trade, and digital asset regulations will face strong checks and balances.
Currently, BTC is slightly up 1.04%, and the market looks relatively stable. But experienced traders know that major macro events often mean "buy the rumor, sell the fact." According to historical patterns, BTC usually retraces and consolidates before rebounding after each election, and this round's decline may decrease with the bottom arriving earlier. More importantly, the market consensus is too uniform now, leading to thin order books, making it easy for minor fluctuations to trigger long-short stampedes.
Therefore, my previous short position logic at 79488 still holds; now it's about holding and waiting for a pullback. If it really gets hammered by negative news, don't panic; a drop is actually a good opportunity to accumulate spot positions in batches. Watch out for short-term spikes, but in the long run, no matter who controls Congress, the implementation of crypto legislation remains a lengthy game. Everyone should manage their positions, set stop losses, and trade with the trend. #USMidtermElections: What are the market expectations? $BTC TRX's trend is relatively stable, with a slight increase of about 0.16% in 24 hours, showing significantly less volatility than most major coins. The funds seem to be waiting for new catalysts. Recently, the circulation of USDT on the Tron chain has surpassed that of Ethereum, and the demand for stablecoin settlement and on-chain transfers remains the core fundamental support for TRX. Its characteristic is that the market may not be the most aggressive, but it tends to be more resistant to volatility during market fluctuations. Going forward, it depends on whether on-chain activity and stablecoin scale can continue to grow, which will determine whether funds are willing to revalue. $TRXWith the Circle financial report approaching, what I most want to see is whether the portion of income the company retains itself has improved along with revenue growth.
In the second quarter, Circle's total revenue and reserve income was about $701 million, with distribution, trading, and other costs around $412 million. The difference is about $289 million, but this still needs to cover operating expenses and cannot be directly considered net profit.
These figures clearly illustrate the characteristics of the stablecoin business: as scale grows, channels and partners are needed, and the income generated by reserves is not all retained by the issuer.
Therefore, even if USDC growth is good in the third quarter, I will look deeper into the details. How much do partner channels take, how much income growth remains after deducting related costs, and whether new business is starting to contribute more—all these are closer to shareholder returns than just the circulation volume alone.
Interest rates are equally important. Reserve yield, average quarterly scale, and channel revenue sharing will jointly affect the results. A strong end-of-period circulation volume does not mean the entire quarter generated income at that scale.
I am optimistic that stablecoin use cases will continue to increase, but I do not want to automatically equate industry growth with company profit growth.
If this financial report can prove that while expanding scale, the company’s retained income and profitability are also improving, I will be more confident. The story of the payment network can be told at length, but shareholders ultimately want to see that as the business grows bigger, the accounts also get better.
#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ 🔥Hot trader's one-liner market view ❮Q&A❯
Today's invited Orbit popular trader is: @诸葛投研✊ Welcome back, boss～👏
❓: You often analyze long-short positions and capital flows. How do you distinguish between institutional hedging and directional bets to avoid being misled by superficial long-short data?
💡 Guest's view: The long-short ratio is just a surface indicator; multi-dimensional data is needed to see the true intent of the funds.
🔗Original view: https://oyidl.co/ul/5UFWAz2
🎁 Today's comment question: 【Which indicator do you value most when judging long-short data?】
➡︎ Use the hashtag #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 to post and share your judgment
➡︎ Follow this account, then return to this post's comment section after posting to leave a message
✅ Selected quality posts will receive a random trading gift pack 🎟️ ETC is a typical old high-volatility asset, showing a clear intraday rebound, but it still tends to follow market sentiment and changes in computing power and miner narratives. Compared to new public chains and popular DeFi, ETC lacks continuous fresh catalysts, so it tends to catch up quickly when the market warms up and also easily gives back gains when the market cools down. This current upward movement indicates signs of capital inflow, but whether it can be sustained depends on continuous trading support; if volume quickly declines, the trend will most likely remain range-bound. $ETC🚨 $HYPE has climbed back above $86! After the pullback, the bulls are starting to regain control?
Earlier, the market was worried about selling pressure and unlocks, and many hesitated to enter. But what really matters is whether Hyperliquid's protocol revenue can continue to convert into HYPE buy orders!
📌 First, the buyback logic still holds weight!
The latest data shows Hyperliquid repurchased about 791,000 HYPE in the past 30 days, valued at approximately $61 million to $65 million. Converting protocol revenue into open market buy orders links HYPE demand with platform trading activity. As long as trading volume and fee income remain resilient, this logic is worth continued monitoring.<Cite
📌 Second, traditional finance expansion opens new opportunities!
Hyperliquid is expanding into on-chain perpetual contracts for stocks, commodities, and other assets, with related partnerships exploring the possibility of regulated U.S. markets. If these materialize and bring real trading volume, platform revenue could grow further. However, regulatory hurdles remain, so expectations should not be mistaken for actual performance.
📊 Third, what should bulls watch next?
🟢 Support to watch: $82–$84, to see if pullback support holds effectively
🔴 First resistance: $87.5–$88, a breakout with volume is needed to continue the rally.
🚀 Second resistance: $92–$95, needs to hold above the previous resistance zone before proceeding.
⚠️ Risk! Approximately 9.92 million $PURR expected to unlock on November 6. #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Let's calculate: the four types of stablecoin service providers mentioned in the material cannot treat the issuer's approval as their own compliance pass. My first reaction is: clearer rules do not automatically mean fewer procedures.
① The GENIUS Act establishes a federal framework for payment stablecoin issuance, but exchanges, wallets, payment processors, and remittance companies—these four types of businesses—may still need FinCEN registration and state-level licenses. My understanding is that having a framework for the issuance side does not mean that all businesses along the chain can directly pass compliance.
② Receiving, controlling, exchanging, and transmitting—the four business actions listed in the material—are important criteria for determining licensing requirements. Compared to what the product is called, I care more about who actually handles the customer's funds; business division is the key focus of verification.
③ Issuer approval and FinCEN registration do not automatically satisfy other federal requirements or state-level license requirements. Since state rules differ, judging whether a platform can conduct business cannot rely on just one approval document.
My judgment is that this is more like a correction of the expectation for "one-step compliance" rather than a direct negative impact on stablecoin applications. If a company is involved in the above businesses and different regions, then the work of evaluating each item is still ongoing—that is my speculation. When you usually judge whether a stablecoin service is reliable, do you value license coverage, fund control methods, or exchange processes the most? Please add any indicators you would check.Coincidentally, the $BTC four-year halving cycle exactly aligns with the U.S. midterm election cycle on the same timeline. Historically in 2014, 2018, and 2022, these three midterm elections all occurred near the end of bear markets. After the midterm elections, there is often one last wave of sell-off and panic liquidation, which marks the cycle bottom, followed by the gradual start of a new bull market. Even more interestingly, the timing of the bottom has been advancing. In 2014, the bear marThe boot has finally dropped, with the Democratic Party taking control of both chambers of Congress, directly breaking the White House and Congress's one-party dominance. Subsequently, the Trump administration's fiscal, trade, and digital asset regulations will face strong checks and balances.
Currently, BTC is slightly up 1.04%, and the market looks relatively stable. But veterans know that major macro events often mean "buy the rumor, sell the fact." According to historical patterns, after each midterm election, BTC usually first pulls back to shake out positions before rebounding. This round's decline may decrease, and the bottom might come earlier. More importantly, the market consensus is too uniform now, causing thin order books, so even a slight stir can easily trigger a long-short stampede.
Therefore, the short position logic I set up earlier at 79488 still holds; now it's just about holding and waiting for a pullback. If it really drops due to negative news, don't panic—falling prices are actually a good opportunity to accumulate spot positions in batches. Watch out for short-term spikes, but in the long run, no matter who controls Congress, the implementation of crypto legislation remains a long and complex game. Everyone should manage their positions well, set stop losses, and trade with the trend. $BTC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 The Democrats won, yet BTC surged 2%? Don't be fooled!!!
The market is not really trading the election results!
This rebound seems abnormal but actually reflects the market's pricing logic: before the election, funds worried that a full Democratic victory would hinder crypto legislation, causing BTC to briefly drop below $76,000; after the results, the biggest uncertainty disappeared, and some funds began covering short positions.
More importantly, the negative factors may have already been priced in. Call buying in the options market increased, and short covering after overselling further amplified the rebound. Democratic control of Congress may indeed increase regulatory resistance, but the president still has executive authority and veto power, so policies won't change overnight.
My judgment: this is not a direct positive for BTC from the Democratic win, but the market first traded panic, then traded expectation fulfillment. In the short term, watch if short covering can continue; in the medium term, it depends on ETF funds, dollar liquidity, and regulatory progress. Don't mistake a single rebound candlestick for a trend reversal signal. $BTC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $XAU gold is so strong today! The increase directly surpasses the drop on October 30th, giving a sense like an arrow piercing through the clouds, with thousands of troops meeting! For a global commodity like gold, a 2.5% rise in one day is quite rare. Yesterday it was still holding at 3900, and today it’s directly challenging 4100. Yesterday’s data showed that in Q3, central banks and related institutions worldwide set a record for gold purchases. Today's catch-up rise is very reasonable. However, commodities are cyclical, and these recent rebounds are not enough to overturn the previous downtrend. Most gold bulls, like me, are still stuck, but when trading $XAU, you really need some patience!Trump said in one sentence, "We have done our best," basically declaring the overall situation settled.
What does it mean? The control of Congress is lost, and the previously hyped crypto-friendly bills and crypto capital plans are directly blocked and hard to advance.
The Democrats took both the House and Senate, a rare big win in forty years, but the biggest risk for the crypto circle is not the bills being stuck. The biggest fear is sudden geopolitical news after election losses. Once news of Middle East military action breaks out, it will cause a double-sided spike, killing both bulls and bears, and no one can escape.
The market has already priced in pessimistic expectations in advance, with Bitcoin showing a daily bearish pattern, ETFs continuously seeing outflows, and $ETH ETFs bleeding longer, making its rebound inherently weaker than $BTC. Those who have recently doubled their gains are advised to take profits first and not chase the tail-end rally.
All current market moves are expectation games; only after the election is fully settled will a true trend emerge.
Going forward, focus on $SPCX as it is the leading signal of this round of risk asset sentiment. If you have no direction, visit the homepage study group for operational ideas.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 78,500 Short Squeeze Drama, Shorts Liquidated 6 Times in a Row, But Don't Mistake Leverage for a "Bull Comeback"
Lords, $BTC has powerfully surged to 78,500, this short squeeze drama is truly intense.
On-chain data reveals a stubborn trader whose short positions were forcibly liquidated 6 times within 2 hours, losing a total of 199.83 BTC (15.45 million USD). The liquidation price of the remaining position hovers at 78,192; if it rises a bit more, more forced selling will occur. The data is even clearer: as long as it breaks 78,054, mainstream CEXs have 684 million in short positions waiting to be triggered; if it reaches 80,983, the liquidation scale will directly soar to 1.116 billion. This rally is purely shorts stepping on their own blood path.
But lords, don't rush to pop the champagne. This is a victory of leverage, not of capital. On the same day, BlackRock iShares saw a net outflow of 405 million, US ETFs had a net outflow of 398 million, and net inflows for the year officially turned negative. Institutions are retreating, leverage is holding on stubbornly, a typical zero-sum game.
Don't forget, the Democrats control both chambers, and Senator Warren holds subpoena power over the Senate Banking Committee, ready to investigate at any time.
Above at 78,836, dense long positions are stacked, which could become fuel for the next round of squeezes. Shorts' funeral—don't drink yourself into becoming the main course at the next feast! This morning many people were saying that Brother 800 got tricked by the dog dealer again 😹😹😹 The price was dropping for several hours, scaring many people away, but now it's back again? I wonder if any brothers bought in at the recent low. It hasn't been long since the email about $BTC dropping below 76,000 was sent, and now there's an email about BTC at 78,000. As always, buy the dip!
Positive news: The election expectations have become very clear this time. The market is betting on the Democrats sweeping both chambers, which leans toward a loose monetary policy expectation, a positive catalyst for tech, semiconductors, and crypto.
The market has already reacted in advance: After BTC hit a low of 75,734, it immediately pulled back to 77,977, a deep V reversal. The shakeout below is done;
$SOXL quickly rebounded from a deep pit at 65.53 to 74.17, with big money entering to bottom-fish, showing a very strong rebound.
If the Democrats take both chambers, future policies will lean more toward liquidity easing, with higher tolerance for inflation pressure, benefiting growth sectors.
After BTC bottoms this round, 90,000 is definitely not the end, just the first stop of this rally; SOXL itself has triple leverage, and with this bottom confirmed, 120 is the starting point for its new trend.
Now is the ambush window before the event lands. The big drop earlier was an opportunity to buy the dip. Of course, keep some defense ready. If the election results deviate from the 88% expectation, the market will directly reverse and crash, so don’t blindly go all in. #USMidtermElections enter the vote counting phase, how will control of Congress change? $SOXL #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Meta drawing roughly $58B of orders for a $15B bond sale shows investors still accept its AI spending case. Yet the 30-year spread, about 90 bps wider than in April, says that confidence now carries a higher price. Demand can fund the buildout; it cannot prove the projects will produce cash flows that outrun the debt burden.
#MetaIssues15BInBonds The U.S. midterm elections concluded, and the crypto market experienced a typical "buy the rumor, sell the fact" style fluctuation. The Democratic Party swept both the House and Senate, initially triggering concerns about tighter regulation. Bitcoin briefly fell below $76,000, and Ethereum dipped to around $2,225. But as the results became clear, political uncertainty instead fueled short-covering: Bitcoin made a V-shaped rebound to around $78,468, approaching the $79,000 mark; Ethereum simultaneously recovered above $2,300, trading at about $2,326.
The logic behind the rebound lies not in the election results themselves, but in the "boot dropping." The Democratic victory had already been priced in by Polymarket at over 75%, and what truly drove the short-term move was the brief risk appetite rebound after uncertainty was removed. On election day, Bitcoin options block trades exceeded $660 million, with about $420 million in call options bought, indicating some capital betting on a rebound after the negative news was fully priced in.
However, holding these levels does not mean buying pressure has returned. While $ETH reclaimed the $2,300 level, spot ETFs have seen net outflows for more than twenty consecutive trading days, with BlackRock's ETHA seeing a single-day outflow of $138 million; Bitcoin's rebound was also largely driven by short-covering, with no significant new buying entering the market. The $78,000 and $2,300 levels currently seem more like psychological stop-loss lines for bulls and bears rather than signals confirming a trend.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Don't be misled by news of corporate accumulation; what really matters is whether there is an overall capital inflow in the market.
BTC spot ETFs have seen a cumulative net outflow of $1.042 billion. Although Strategy continues to buy 811 BTC, it is simultaneously conducting preferred stock buybacks, so corporate treasury actions do not equate to new market buying.
Currently, BTC is fluctuating repeatedly between $77,000 and $80,000, and buying momentum remains insufficient.
ETH's performance is also weak, with limited capital support. If BTC weakens again, ETH may face greater correction pressure.
My judgment is: corporate accumulation can only provide localized support and cannot compensate for ETF capital outflows in the long term.
Whether $80,000 can be broken ultimately depends on real capital inflows, not treasury news.
$BTC $ETH
#DemocratsWinCongress Democrats win big, will the US stock market see a turning point?✨ In the short term, there will be pressure and volatility, and the risk of tighter regulatory policies must be faced. The market is likely to experience severe fluctuations
✨ Mid-to-long-term strategy
After the uncertainty settles, the long-term development logic of AI will not change, and ultimately the market trend will still return to corporate performance and profit growth
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
$BTC $ETH $SOXL Today's market is so strange! If you only look at the surface data, you'd definitely be scared to death, but the market actually made a perfect deep V reversal from 75736 ➡️ 78436. Who exactly is controlling the market behind this? I reviewed three key data points and discovered secrets the main players don't want you to know: Strange "volume-price divergence" Price rose: BTC was forcibly pulled back above 78000 from the low point, a 3.6% increase. Leverage decreased: Contract open interest actually dropped by 1860 BTC, and the long-short ratio fell from 2.68 to 2.10. ETF outflow: Net outflow of $1.16 billion in the last 3 trading days. Conclusion: This is not driven by retail investors! Retail investors are selling or afraid to buy. This is a typical "short covering" + "spot whale accumulation"! The main players don't need to increase leverage; they directly use spot buying to crush the shorts. This kind of rise is the most solid! Who is buying? Who is selling? Sellers: Mainly ETF institutions and previous longs (who have been washed out). Buyers: Since leverage hasn't increased, it means "smart money" is quietly building positions. They avoid contracts and directly buy on the spot market, taking chips from ETFs and panicked retail investors. My judgment: This kind of "rising on shrinking volume" often means selling pressure is exhausted. As long as it doesn't break below 76500, this rebound is a real reversal! Mindset: The current market is an "institutional game period," with large volatility. Since the main players are pushing on the spot side, we should follow by trading spot or going long, and avoid trying to short at the top lightly! $BTC $ETH I stared at the K-line chart for a long time, while the whale turned around and bought SanDisk and Hynix.
Not Bitcoin, not Ethereum. It's $SNDK, $MRVL, $SKHX, three positions, $29.07 million, 3x leverage, all opened together in the afternoon.
The most frustrating part is that all are in floating profit. The SanDisk position has a floating profit of 137,000, Marvell 78,600, Hynix 32,200. They made it in one afternoon, I took a whole day.
I admit I don't understand it. Storage, chips, semiconductors—these three seem like a completely different world from the charts I usually watch. But they happened to make money.
So the problem might not be whether they bought right, but what exactly I am focusing on.BTC is hovering almost motionless around 77,000, while ETH quietly rose by 0.41%. This scene of "big brother dozing off, second brother stretching" has been appearing quite frequently lately. Do you think this is a probe before a launch, or are the divergences quietly widening? When watching the market, I’m paying more attention to sector strength rather than just the rise or fall of a single coin by a few points. BTC has almost zero volatility in 24 hours, ETH is slightly stronger, and SOL has actually dipped a bit. This structure doesn’t look like a full-scale attack but more like funds picking positions and testing directions. On the stablecoin side, Circle’s financial report is approaching, and AMD’s data center revenue is nearly doubling and exceeding expectations. External risk appetite actually has some support, but the crypto market hasn’t responded enthusiastically right away, indicating some expectations may have already been priced in. My understanding is that we are closer to a "divergence phase" rather than a "launch phase". The reason is that the leaders haven’t spread the rally, altcoins haven’t caught up, and sentiment hasn’t clearly heated up. The bullish path is: if ETH continues to be relatively strong, it will drive altcoins to catch up, risk appetite will gradually return, and the rhythm will shift from probing to continuation. The bearish risk is: BTC delays giving direction, volume doesn’t keep up, and once sector strength reverses, the early movers may easily become distribution targets. What really needs watching is whether ETH can transmit its strength outward, not just that it gained a few tenths of a point today. The trend is still waiting for a confirmation signal, so don’t rush to define it. The above is just my personal market observation and does not constitute any trading advice. #BTC #ETH #SOL #Circle #AltcoinSeason#Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ The core dilemma of Circle's earnings report tonight is whether the growth in USDC scale can offset the decline in reserve yield and the erosion of distribution costs. Q3 USDC circulation was about $74.58 billion, a moderate expansion from Q2's $73.3 billion, but it had fallen back to about $70 billion by the end of October, casting doubt on the sustainability of growth. More critically, reserve income is expected to be $656 million, down quarter-on-quarter due to the interest rate environment suppressing yields. Meanwhile, Q2 distribution and transaction costs reached $412 million, leaving only about 41% of income retained after deductions. My view is: stablecoin "volume growth" does not necessarily translate into "income growth". Circle's profitability quality depends on interest margin and channel bargaining power, not just circulation scale. If the earnings report shows USDC growth accompanied by worsening unit economics, the market's pricing logic for "stablecoin growth stocks" will face revision.Shorting BTC at 40x leverage, I don't directly consider it a trend-following trade—daring to go heavy doesn't mean standing on the trend's side. This new short position nominally amounts to about $416,600, but since the material doesn't provide price trends or market sentiment, the direction still needs verification.
I have three principles for trading trends. First, look at the structure; if the lows keep moving down, then this short has a trend-following basis—that's my judgment criterion. Second, check if sentiment aligns; one wallet shorting doesn't represent market consensus and can't be taken as bearish confirmation. Third, leverage can't replace judgment: ignoring maintenance margin and fees, 40x leverage can wipe out the initial margin with about a 2.5% adverse move, and actual forced liquidation could happen even earlier; even if the direction is right, it might not withstand a retracement.
The trend is the best friend; I'd rather wait for confirmation than use high leverage to boost my courage. When encountering such short positions, do you now use moving averages, price highs and lows, or volume to judge the trend? Specifically, which timeframe do you look at?Calculating, the original plan to allocate 36,200 coins is close to 40% of the ZCG treasury. The Zcash Community Grant Committee has now withdrawn the proposal to transfer about 98,000 $ZEC for future mining rewards, stating that subsequent arrangements should follow the existing governance process.
① The treasury has about 91,500 coins. The material says this is enough for many years of expenditure, so I don't interpret the withdrawal as the committee lacking funds. ② ZCG automatically receives about 144 coins daily. The plan also involves reducing future income, so the 98,000 coins cannot be fully counted as current treasury expenditure. ③ The income reduction was originally planned to continue until the halving before 2028. Fewer miners is a pending supplement, not a deduction of already received rewards.
My judgment: This time it seems more like a cooling of long-term miner subsidy expectations rather than an immediate reduction in rewards. I will watch whether subsequent governance can separately clarify treasury allocations and future income, and discuss the impact once the accounts are clear.