Orbit Post Sitemap
🚨 Was the exchange hack news really just a trigger for a massive liquidation?
The timing feels suspicious. The news hit during the Asian session, when many traders were asleep, potentially creating the perfect setup to wipe out overleveraged positions.
Was it a genuine security incident or a coordinated market shakeout? No proof yet, but the timing raises questions.
Let's watch the next move. 👀
$BTC $ETH #Bitcoin #Ethereum #CryptoMarket
#DailyOrbit Currently weak consolidation, support at 2100, strong support at 2050; resistance above at 2180-2200.
As long as Binance does not release the positive news of withdrawal resumption, the rebound is likely just a correction, and it is difficult to directly reverse into a major trend.
Today is Friday, some funds will choose to reduce positions before the weekend to avoid risk, making it easy to experience consolidation or continue to test support downward.🚨 Confirmed $630 million heist: North Korean hacker group "TraderTraitor" responsible!
Mastermind: TRM Labs and CNN both confirm the attack originated from the hacker group
Modus operandi: Exploited Ethereum EIP-7702 mechanism, bombarding Binance wallets with 50 authorization attempts, succeeding only once to steal assets
Chain of clues: ZachXBT discovered stolen funds flowing to the same address involved in Bitget's $388 million vulnerability case, suspected to be the same gang
Latest update: Binance's He Yi stated withdrawal functions are expected to resume within 48 hours
Stole the money but became a "global live target"—this operation truly is a "high-IQ crime, low-IQ cash-out"!
#加密黑天鵝 $BTC Discussing Coinbase, it can't always just follow the BTC price.
The company disclosed in Q3 that subscription and service revenue accounted for 49% of total net revenue; the average USDC holdings within products reached $22 billion. This part of the business broadens the perspective for researching Coinbase and brings different influencing factors.
For example, higher interest rates may suppress risk asset sentiment but also affect the economic benefits related to stablecoin reserve yields. For Coinbase, the impact of the macro environment needs to be assessed separately along different revenue sources.
Of course, subscription and service revenue should not be entirely understood as stablecoin interest, nor should it be automatically considered as income without volatility. Business composition, USDC scale, and partnership arrangements all affect the final performance.
But I quite like this change: the platform increasingly has opportunities to meet user demands through multiple services, without having to wait every quarter for spot trading to heat up.
The Deribit integration is worth tracking, and stablecoin and subscription businesses are also worth further analysis. If these business lines can complement each other, operational performance may become more resilient.
So now when I look at Coinbase, I ask less "how much did the coin price rise" and more "which activities are customers keeping on the platform." Being able to continue generating revenue when the market is not so excited better reflects the platform's capability.
#Coinbase整合Deribit，Q3收入能否改善？ Today, the US stock market is very likely to open lower and continue to decline, with increasing divergence. The Nasdaq is under the most pressure, while the Dow is relatively more resilient.
Pre-market signals are already very clear: Nasdaq futures once dropped more than 2.3%, S&P 500 futures fell nearly 1.1%, and Dow futures only declined about 0.3%. The main drags come from three areas: Intel's pre-market plunge of nearly 25%, with Q4 guidance completely collapsing and triggering multiple major banks to lower their target prices; memory chip stocks collectively retreating, with SanDisk down over 5% pre-market, SK Hynix, Micron, and Western Digital all weakening simultaneously; Amazon falling more than 7% pre-market after earnings, as cash flow anxiety over AI capital expenditures continues to ferment.
What is more worrisome structurally is that hedge funds are shifting from shorting individual stocks to shorting index ETFs. Short interest in QQQ has recently surged, stock correlations have been pushed higher, and the VIX is accumulating vulnerability to disorderly spikes. This means that if there is a concentrated sell-off during the session, the downward slope at the index level could be steeper than what individual stock divergence suggests.
Tonight, the US Q3 Labor Cost Index and October Chicago PMI are also due to be released. If the data is strong, it will further suppress rate cut expectations. Overall, today is not a "broad crash" scenario, but the strength of the Nasdaq's rebound after a lower open, and whether Intel can narrow its losses after the open, are key observation points to judge whether the sell-off will spread to systemic risk. #美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 #英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 #亚马逊Q3营收略逊预期，AWS增速达近五年最快水平 $$BTC $SNDK "Intel's 22% Plunge Is Just the Appetizer? Storage Price Hikes Are 'Backfiring' on the Entire PC Chain!"
After-hours saw a big bearish candle, with Intel directly hammered down 22%, the market voting with its feet. Executive Chen Liwu also laid it out: PC demand is extremely weak, yet memory prices are still soaring wildly, and this profit gap may not be filled even by the first half of 2027.
The underlying logic is very harsh: AI computing power is popping champagne, while traditional PCs are busy patching a leaky roof.
A couple of years ago, the whole internet was hyping a "storage super cycle," but now the aftereffects have fully erupted. Upstream giants like SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron are making explosive profits riding the AI dividend; meanwhile, downstream PC manufacturers and chipmakers are being ground down by soaring storage costs. End products aren't selling, costs can't be cut, and the more they produce, the more money they lose.
Trading takeaway:
Don't get itchy to catch a falling knife just because it dropped 22%! An oversold rebound in a declining sector does not equal a trend reversal. The core question is where the money in the industry chain is flowing—AI computing power and upstream storage are still wildly attracting capital, while the traditional hardware chain's tough days are far from over.
Follow the capital flow trend; don't stubbornly fight in a breaking downtrend. Hold your position steady, control your impulses, and don't get carried away! $INTC
#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高
For personal market observation only, not investment advice.SK Hynix and Samsung both reported record-high earnings, yet their stock prices fell. Why?
SK Hynix's Q3 revenue was 104.62 trillion KRW, operating profit 83.33 trillion KRW, exceeding expectations by about 8.3%; large-scale shipments of HBM4, server DDR5 shipments increased over 40% quarter-on-quarter, and both DRAM and NAND average prices rose more than 20%. Samsung's revenue was 195.3 trillion KRW, operating profit 107.4 trillion KRW, with semiconductors contributing 106.5 trillion KRW, but semiconductor profits were slightly below analyst expectations, causing the stock price to drop 4.13% initially.
Demand is indeed strong: SK Hynix said supply shortages may continue until 2030, having signed long-term agreements with 14 customers covering more than half of capacity for 2027-2028; Samsung also believes AI storage demand will exceed supply in 2027.
However, the market is worried about the sentiment triggered by Google: revenue below expectations, huge AI investments, negative cash flow, and a 12.64% drop in stock price. People are starting to worry that tech companies are aggressively building data centers but returns are lagging, and if customers control spending, SK Hynix and Samsung's orders will also be affected.
Therefore: AI storage demand is strong, and the companies are truly profitable, but capital expenditures hang like a sword over them, so the stock prices are under pressure for now. $xGOOGL Looking at crypto prediction markets, if a previously unpopular outcome suddenly gets marked up to 70%, I want to dig into what happened in between. Is there really new information, or is the liquidity pool too shallow so that just a few trades pushed the price up?
Unlike buying Bitcoin and waiting for price changes, here the market is pricing whether a certain event will happen or not. The odds show where the money is flowing, but that doesn't mean the event is actually that certain. I'm quite interested in seeing the transaction process, but just watching the probability alone doesn't reveal who changed their mind.AMD’s Q2 Data Center revenue grew 107% year on year, so the Nov. 3 Q3 report will test whether AI demand is becoming repeatable revenue rather than a single strong comparison. Progress in Instinct chips and Helios systems matters, but the source does not establish deployment pace or cloud-provider conversion. That uncertainty is the real bar for durability.
#AMDQ3HeliosRevenue $ZEC Direction: Short
· Entry: Short when the rebound is resisted around 1260 - 1280.
· Stop Loss: Firmly stop loss if it breaks through 1300.
· Take Profit: First target 1200, second target 1181 (near previous low).
⚠️ Note: Overall in the secondary pullback phase after the rebound, MACD dead cross below zero axis and bearish momentum begins to increase. Do not chase shorts directly, wait for rebound to confirm resistance, use light positions with stop loss.$SNDK Direction: Short
· Entry: Short when the rebound is resisted around 1280 - 1300.
· Stop Loss: Firmly stop loss if it breaks through 1320.
· Take Profit: First target 1261 (near previous low), second target 1240.
⚠️ Note: Overall, it is in the secondary bottoming phase after an extreme plunge, with MACD dead cross below the zero line and strong bearish momentum. Do not chase shorts directly; wait for rebound confirmation of resistance, use light positions with stop loss.It's almost 5 PM, brothers, are you staring at the market so much that you're starting to hallucinate? Don't think there's no action just because Bitcoin isn't moving. Look at the data for these popular altcoins—the leverage underneath is about to explode!
First, look at $PEPE, current price 0.00000493. That spike last night totally tricked people. Now the 4-hour long-short ratio is 2.59, and open interest remains high. Retail traders are battling inside, getting hit from both sides repeatedly. With such a violently spiking market, if you don't have skills, don't jump in—going in is just giving away your money.
Next, $DOGE at 0.0754, the 4-hour long-short ratio has reached an absurd 5.04. The price is steadily declining, but long leverage is piling up to the sky, showing retail traders are stubbornly holding on and even adding positions. Once it breaks the 0.072 support, a chain reaction of liquidations will come.
Finally, $SUI at 0.881 has broken below the 0.9 mark. The long-short ratio is still as high as 2.99, and open interest remains elevated. Retail longs are still holding on desperately. The big players won’t pump until they clean out these leverages.
Summary: The leverage on these popular coins is all crowded on the long side. The main forces are ready to swing the scythe anytime. Control your hands, don’t blindly bottom-fish.
Brothers, do you have DOGE or PEPE during this pullback? Did you cut losses and run or are you holding on?
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 Net profit of $719 million, $715 million of which is unrealized gains from held coins: A leading US exchange just released its Q3 report, showing a divergence between book profits and trading business.
Total revenue was $1.216 billion, down 35% year-over-year, roughly flat quarter-over-quarter, slightly below the expected $1.233 billion. Trading revenue was $590 million, down 44% year-over-year and down 1% quarter-over-quarter, but above the expected $527 million. Subscription and services revenue was $570 million, up 3% quarter-over-quarter, accounting for 49% of net revenue. Net profit was $719 million, diluted EPS of $2.51, reversing losses from the previous two quarters, with about $715 million coming from investment gains on held crypto assets. The roughly 39% increase in Bitcoin price in Q3 was a key factor behind these unrealized gains. Excluding investment gains, adjusted net profit was only $78 million, with adjusted EBITDA at $333 million, up 60% quarter-over-quarter. The Q4 guidance for subscription and services revenue is $550 million to $630 million, and as of October 25, Q4 trading revenue is about $165 million.
Personally, I think the highlight of this report is that unrealized gains and subscription business are holding up the numbers, while trading itself has not yet recovered, so the quality of profits is questionable.
Where do you stand: Is profit supported by unrealized gains on held coins considered a real recovery, or does it only count when trading revenue turns positive year-over-year again?
$BTC 民主党拿下国会，马斯克、$SPCX 会被清算吗？
1. 不会直接叫停合并，但监管调查、听证会大概率会落地。国会仅有监督施压权，没法直接否决并购，决定权在 SEC。漫长审查会拉高合并的不确定性，压制市场炒作预期。
2. 本次合并本身依托宽松监管环境。若民主党掌权，会施压监管机构，重点质疑 SpaceX 和特斯拉合并后的利益冲突。市场最怕审批无限延期，一旦预期走弱，SPCX 溢价会快速消退，连带拖累特斯拉估值。
3. 两种行情走向：只拿下单一议院，利空脉冲式下跌，不适合追空；两院全拿下就是强利空，适合 SPCX 反弹空，规避特斯拉高位多。
4. 大选前属于预期博弈，盘面震荡大，别重仓押注。民调偏向民主党就逢反弹空 SPCX；共和党守住国会，监管风险缓解，标的存在反弹机会。
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 Seeing Core Trader 39 open a new long position on $BTC with 10x leverage, position size 1 BTC, nominal value about $78,400. This trade hasn't concluded yet; I'm more interested in dissecting the risk rules rather than guessing if he knows something. 🤖
If I were to write it as a strategy, I would set it as: if the preset stop loss corresponds to a loss exceeding the single trade budget, then reduce the position or abandon it, rather than triggering a buy just because the wallet opened a long. Roughly calculating based on initial margin, a 1% adverse price movement corresponds to about a 10% margin loss; leverage amplifies judgment errors.
The advantage of this rule is that it limits the cost of mistakes first, but the loopholes are obvious: the stop loss price is not the execution price, slippage may cause actual losses to exceed the budget; the data also doesn't provide his stop loss or other positions, so we can't judge the full intent by looking at this trade alone. My reminder to myself is to clearly write the exit conditions first, then study the entry signals.The real concern about Binance's recent security incident is not the $6.3 billion
Today, Binance announced a major security incident, with a preliminary estimated impact of about $6.3 billion, and approximately $3 billion of assets have been frozen so far.
Binance stated that it will cover all losses through the SAFU fund and the company's own funds.
However, I believe the biggest impact on the market from this event is not just the financial loss, but trust.
Many people entering the crypto space first choose an exchange. Now that even one of the largest trading platforms in the industry has experienced such a security incident, ordinary investors will inevitably reconsider where to place their assets.
In the short term, market sentiment will be difficult to recover immediately.
But I am also paying attention to another direction: if more funds start to value self-custody and on-chain trading, will the DEX sector receive new attention as a result?
Next, we will focus on observing Binance's security investigation, the progress of fund freezing, and whether BTC can stabilize.
The market can endure a crash, but trust takes time to repair.Today (October 30), the Japanese stock market displayed a very extreme "sell heavyweights, buy domestic demand" divergent pattern. The Nikkei 225 index plunged more than 1900 points intraday, breaking below the 63,000 mark, and finally closed down 2.12% (down 1369.36 points) at 63,290.11, ending its previous consecutive gains. Despite the deep index decline, 51% of stocks in the TOPIX Prime market rose, indicating that funds did not withdraw across the board but were actively rotating and switching stocks.
Today's capital in the Japanese market mainly focused on the following directions:
🚨 Semiconductor and AI Industry Chain: Hit by a series of external earnings shocks
After-hours earnings reports from Intel and Amazon in the U.S. revealed huge capital expenditure pressures, triggering strong market doubts about the return cycle of AI investments. Panic sentiment directly hit Japanese semiconductor heavyweight stocks.
· Core leaders plunged: Semiconductor testing giant Advantest fell 5.86%, Tokyo Electron dropped 5.2%, and these two stocks alone dragged the Nikkei index down by about 731 points.
· Hardware and materials sharply declined: AI packaging substrate giant Ibiden faced pressure on Intel order expectations, hitting the daily limit down intraday and closing down 15.21%; inspection equipment maker Lasertec fell 8.81%; SoftBank Group dropped over 6%; storage leader Kioxia also fell 7.14%.
✈️ Defensive and Domestic Travel Demand: The absolute mainstay for risk-averse funds
Against the backdrop of heavy tech stock sell-offs, sectors with defensive attributes and independent domestic demand logic strengthened against the trend, becoming key to maintaining market profitability.
· Transportation sectors led gains: Stocks related to travel and logistics attracted clustered funds, with air, sea, and land transport sectors leading the gains. ANA Holdings surged 6.31%, and shipping and logistics stocks generally closed higher against the trend.
· Retail and leisure consumption: Benefiting from a relatively strong yen exchange rate and domestic consumption expectations, the retail sector performed strongly, with Oriental Land (operator of Tokyo Disneyland) rising 8.45%.
🎮 Individual Stocks Exceeding Earnings Expectations: Independent rallies against the trend
In a weak market, earnings realization became the strongest certainty pursued by funds.
· Konami: Due to strong performance of main IPs like "eFootball" and "Yu-Gi-Oh!", the company significantly raised its full-year earnings guidance (operating profit forecast raised from ¥143 billion to ¥193 billion), with its stock soaring 15.02% to a record high, becoming the top gainer among Nikkei 225 components.
· Other stocks exceeding expectations: Water engineering company Metawater hit the daily limit up (+23.3%) due to earnings and dividend upgrades; Mars Group Holdings announced a large-scale buyback, with its stock surging 9.7%.
💡 Macro and Policy: Bank of Japan decision and ETF sales
The Bank of Japan maintained interest rates unchanged at today's policy meeting, basically meeting market expectations, with the rate decision passed by an 8-1 vote. However, the bank also announced it will increase the annual scale of ETF sales from about ¥330 billion to about ¥860 billion starting January next year. Although this news caused some intraday disturbance, the market did not interpret it as a fatal liquidity tightening, and the decline narrowed toward the close.
Overall, today's Japanese stock market used the semiconductor equipment plunge to complete a "catch-down" to the negative U.S. AI earnings reports, while the strong rallies in Konami, Oriental Land, ANA, and other domestic demand and consumer stocks achieved an extreme sector rotation and style rebalancing.
Would you like to learn more about a specific stock that exceeded earnings expectations or the subsequent risk points in the Japanese semiconductor industry chain? 【Black Swan? Where is the support? Recharge your faith!】
Objective market: The 7.5 area is strong support. 7.94 is the current resistance.
Subjective: Although I've been bearish for over a month and keep saying that the big cycle BTC will still go down to 6, the 75-76 range is objectively a major support. I don't think it can break down directly.
Today, everyone is flooding with bad news. Some see 7w, some see 6w. But do you still remember yourself shouting to enter at 78 when BTC was above 8w?
Don't panic! Respect the objective market~
Operation advice:
For short positions above 8, just move the stop loss to around 795. You can continue to reduce positions around 76.
If tonight the second test of the 75-76 area does not break (and is accompanied by certain volume), you can try to go long with a stop loss at 7.5 or the low point of the spike at that time. Stop loss about 1000 points. Take profit above 2000 points, ultimately aiming for around 7.9. The risk-reward ratio is also appropriate. 【Only enter after breaking below and recovering 75, or after a volume spike and consolidation around 76! There is no entry opportunity if it directly crashes through 75!】
Plan your trades, trade your plan!~
$BTC #加密行业协同守护资产安全 $INTC When trading, you must understand one thing: events are the fuse for trends. Many people think that the hacker theft caused the big dip, or that Intel's poor earnings report caused the after-hours plunge. Essentially, they look for bad news when prices fall and good news when prices rise.
This viewpoint is wrong. Take Intel as an example. I posted an analysis of Intel during the session, warning that Intel's trend was weak and started shorting. First, everyone needs to understand one principle: large institutions conduct very thorough research on listed companies. They roughly understand the earnings report before it is released. The most direct evidence is that Wall Street's revenue forecasts for a company and the actual revenue usually don't differ much.
Under this premise, institutions will have a rough guess about Intel's earnings report in advance—it could be good or bad. If it's bad, they will sell off some positions early to hedge, which will show as weakness in the price movement. I warned early that Intel needed to rebound to 96.67 to possibly find a bottom. If Intel were really strong, it would have easily reached 96.67 during the recovery from Monday to Wednesday. Failing to reach that level more or less indicates that institutions' expectations for the earnings report are not high. Since institutions have a higher success rate than us, even if you don't short, there's no reason to go long.$INTC
Eight consecutive quarters of earnings beating expectations, then a drop of more than 20% overnight. Intel's Q4 guidance dragged down the chip and storage sectors in pre-market trading.
Q3 itself was flawless: adjusted EPS of 52 cents, while the market expected just over 40 cents; revenue of $16.5 billion, up 20% year-over-year, also beating expectations for eight consecutive quarters. The problem lies in the next quarter—revenue guidance of $15 to $16 billion, while Wall Street was expecting $17 billion; EPS guidance of 25 cents, with an expectation of 43 cents. The shutdown of the Israeli factory will also cost $300 million in revenue. The company itself says the PC market will shrink 12% this year and shrink another 10% next year.
Despite beating expectations for eight quarters, the stock price does not reward the past. It fell from $92 to $73 overnight, and the INTC token on OKX is now at 67.8, with a low of 67.37, even worse than the pre-market US stock price. The storage sector also fell broadly in pre-market trading, with SanDisk and others taking a hit.
Such a big pit caused by single-quarter guidance carries emotional pricing for the first three days and is not reliable. The real test will be when the US stock market opens tonight; the pre-market price is just a reading of the announcement.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 Today (October 30), the South Korean stock market experienced a systemic plunge triggered by the "Alphabet shock" from the U.S. stock market. The KOSPI index plunged over 5% intraday, triggering the sell-side "Sidecar" circuit breaker, and closed down 3.48% at 5730.74 points, falling below 5800 points; the KOSDAQ index simultaneously dropped 3.83% to 724.38 points. Semiconductor heavyweight stocks were heavily sold off, while capital underwent intense structural reallocation amid extreme panic.
📉 Semiconductor sector became the hardest hit in the sell-off
Overnight, Alphabet plummeted 12.6% due to a surge in AI capital expenditures and negative free cash flow, sparking market doubts about the sustainability of AI investment returns. Panic quickly spread to the South Korean semiconductor sector, which is highly sensitive to AI computing power.
· SK Hynix closed down 7.08% at 1.418 million KRW, with intraday losses nearing 9.5%.
· Samsung Electronics closed down 3.02% at 225,000 KRW, with intraday losses reaching 6.68%.
· Industry chain: Samsung Electro-Mechanics plunged 7.50%, SK Square fell 5.88%; KOSDAQ semiconductor equipment and materials stocks **Symtek (-8.02%), Wonik IPS (-7.72%), Jusung Engineering (-6.78%)** suffered severe declines.
💰 Significant net outflow of foreign capital and domestic funds stepping in
The capital flow showed a clear confrontation pattern:
· Foreign investors net sold about 1.617 trillion KRW, with SK Hynix net sold by 429 billion KRW and Samsung Electronics net sold by 213.4 billion KRW.
· Individuals and institutions combined net bought over 1.36 trillion KRW, with pension funds buying 892.9 billion KRW throughout the day, becoming a key force in preventing further index collapse.
🛡️ Counter-trend highlights: pharmaceutical biology and some defensive sectors
While semiconductors collapsed across the board, funds flowed into sectors with defensive or independent catalysts:
· The pharmaceutical sector closed up 4.9% against the trend. Samsung Biologics surged 8.86% to 1.487 million KRW; Hanmi Pharmaceutical and Celltrion also ranked among the top institutional net buys.
· LG Energy Solution rose 0.98% against the trend; some secondary battery stocks showed relative resilience amid the plunge, limiting the downside of the index.
· Traditional defensive sectors rose slightly: transportation and storage +1.33%, food, beverage, and tobacco +1.08%, textiles and apparel +1.04%, electricity and gas +0.74%.
Summary: The core logic of today’s Korean stock market is the "AI computing power bubble deflation" combined with "earnings realization game." Semiconductor heavyweight stocks were sharply sold off under external shocks and foreign capital outflows, triggering a negative feedback loop of programmatic selling; meanwhile, pharmaceutical biology, secondary batteries, and traditional defensive sectors absorbed the risk-averse funds withdrawn from tech growth. The market is reassessing the return cycle of AI capital expenditures and is highly dependent in the short term on whether U.S. tech giants can halt their declines during regular trading hours tonight.$ETH
On the same afternoon, two giant whales were opposing each other, and at times like this, I usually don't take sides. On-chain monitoring showed that one address held a long position for several months with an unrealized profit of over 20 million USD, then reversed to open a 20x short position of 13,000 ETH; another address switched from short to long, with a long position of over 11 million USD open. 58bro sold 8,000 ETH in one hour, worth just over 18 million USD.
What does 20x mean? A 2% drop would wipe out the margin. Those who dare to leverage this much either really have some insider information or are just betting on short-term moves. The one switching from short to long isn't innocent either; both sides are holding large margins and betting against each other, turning the price into a tug of war.
Actual test on OKX shows the current price at 2228, down nearly 4% in 24 hours, with a low of 2171. The funding rate is already negative 0.75 basis points, meaning shorts are paying longs; contract open interest is 647,000 ETH, about 1.44 billion USD. Despite the price drop over several days, positions haven't shrunk much, and holders are still in.
Last time I copied a whale's trade, I ended up on the wrong side when they closed their position. Since then, I've learned my lesson. When whales fight each other, small fish should avoid standing in the middle.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 The undefeated hunter on the $ETH chain has opened a new position.
Address 0xe813 just took on 25x leverage and directly swept over $45 million worth of $ETH long positions.
Retail investors are still hesitating whether to cut losses and wait for a lower point, while the big players daring to bet heavily have already started betting on a rebound.
Daring to move such a position at this level clearly shows confidence that it can't be crushed in the short term.
#ETH
$ETH
👇#StrategyQ3ProfitSurges Is Intel's 22% plunge just the beginning? Storage price hikes are backfiring across the entire PC chain
After-hours saw a big bearish candle, with Intel directly slammed down 22%, the market voting with its feet. Chen Liwu also laid it out: PC demand is weak, but memory prices are soaring wildly, and this gap might not be filled even by the first half of 2027.
The essence is simple—AI computing power is popping champagne, while traditional PCs are fixing the roof. In the past two years, everyone talked about the “storage super cycle,” but now the aftereffects have arrived: upstream players like Hynix, Samsung, and Micron are making huge profits, while downstream PC manufacturers and chipmakers are being ground down by high storage costs. End products aren’t selling, costs won’t come down, and production is becoming increasingly painful.
So, don’t get itchy to catch the falling knife just because of the big drop. A rebound in a declining sector doesn’t mean a reversal; where the money flows in the industry chain is the key. AI computing power and upstream storage are still attracting capital, and the tough days for the traditional PC chain may not be over yet. Hold your position steady, don’t get carried away. #IntelQ4EarningsGuidanceBelowExpectations, stock price plummets $INTC $PEPE Intel's earnings exceeded expectations, but the stock plunged 23% after hours
Q3 revenue was $16.5 billion, up 21% year-over-year, adjusted EPS was $0.52, far exceeding the expected $0.40
Data center and AI revenue was $7.3 billion, up 78% year-over-year, marking the strongest growth in 15 years
Regular close was $92.07, down 3.62%, after-hours dropped to $70.87 at one point, implying a market cap loss of over $112 billion
The culprit is next quarter: Q4 revenue guidance is only $15 billion to $16 billion, with expectations at $17 billion
Adjusted EPS guidance is $0.25, expected was $0.43, gross margin guidance is 38%, expected 42.8%
An explosion at the Israel factory will cost about $300 million in revenue this quarter, lowering gross margin by 2 percentage points
PC business revenue was $8.1 billion, down 5% year-over-year, the company openly states weakness will last at least until mid-2027
Even harsher is the statement: no positive cash flow next year, and capital expenditures will be significantly increased again in 2027
I think this is not a miss on earnings, but the market repricing "burning cash to expand production + demand peaking"; the invalidation point is if tonight's regular trading narrows the decline to within 10%, or if there is a substantial rebound signal in PC orders
Bottom out now or wait for guidance to be disproved?
$INTC $AMD $DELL
#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 Binance hacker split 18,270 $BTC (about $1.4B) into 19 wallets, 17 of them with exactly 1,000 each, and none has moved since Thursday night. Yet $445M of longs were liquidated in 24h vs only $85M of shorts. So the dip is driven by leverage, not by stolen coins. What do you think moves $BTC next: more liquidations or the first transfer from those wallets?PCE 3.6%, Binance anomaly, $1.5 billion liquidations across the network: dissecting the full chain of BTC's early morning crash
This round of BTC's rapid dip to the 77,000 level in the early morning is a complete downward chain driven by macro bottoming, black swan trigger, and leverage amplification. The US September PCE inflation came in at 3.6%, with inflation stickiness exceeding expectations. The market repriced the Fed's rate cut delay expectations, US Treasury yields came under pressure and rose, risk asset valuations were suppressed in advance, and BTC had already entered a fragile state of weak oscillation from above 81,000, laying the groundwork for the subsequent sharp drop.
The real trigger was Binance's hot wallet anomaly involving billions in asset transfers out. The platform urgently suspended deposits and withdrawals to investigate security vulnerabilities. Exchange security panic spread rapidly, spot safe-haven funds fled en masse, and BTC quickly broke below the 80,000 psychological level. After breaking this level, the leverage liquidation chain fully activated, with total liquidations across the network approaching $1.5 billion, the vast majority being long positions. Forced liquidation programs automatically sold, creating a long-short feedback loop that further amplified the retracement. Altcoins fell far more than the market, with small-cap narrative coins like CORE and FOGO experiencing especially volatile swings.
The hierarchy to clarify: PCE inflation data is the underlying pressure, determining the market's already weak upward momentum; Binance's security incident is the sudden detonator breaking the balance; the $1.5 billion level long liquidations are the core amplifier that rapidly hammered the price down.
In summary: macro data made the market fragile, the exchange black swan ignited the sell-off, and leverage liquidations completed the final deep plunge.Approximately $1.49 billion in forced liquidations within 24 hours, with longs taking $1.29 billion, accounting for 86.8%. Over 240,000 accounts were wiped out. Bitcoin alone accounted for $475 million, Ethereum $331 million.
Within one hour, $629 million was liquidated, almost entirely longs. The largest single order remembered was a BTC long on Binance for about $11.09 million. The price is still hovering around 78033.5 and 2229.6, and many feel "after the dump, it should stabilize."
My view is the opposite: liquidations of this scale look more like clearing out leveraged positions, which doesn’t mean spot buying has returned. Do you think the next wave will be shorts covering, or longs adding leverage again?What's the current situation with $BTC?
In a nutshell: BTC is currently weak and consolidating at the bottom. There are buyers at the bottom, but the long positions on board are too crowded, so in the short term, it's very likely to fluctuate further.
Price: The current price is about 78,000, with a short-term bearish bias. Key support is at 76,000–77,000; a decisive break below this points to 75,000. On the upside, only a break above 80,300 will ease short-term pressure. Today's biggest pain point for options is at 78,000, so this level will be tested repeatedly.
Most dangerous: Nearly 70% of accounts are crowded in long positions, and liquidations will mainly hit longs. However, leveraged positions are still increasing—price is falling but leverage isn't decreasing, indicating some are still catching falling knives. The main players are likely to sweep lower again to clear out longs. There are dense liquidation zones near 78,600 and 77,700; hitting these could trigger cascading liquidations.
Capital flow: ETFs have had net inflows for three consecutive days, totaling over 400 million USD. BlackRock bought over 3,400 BTC below 80,000, clearly accumulating at low levels. But ETF inflows have not yet translated into price support; hedge fund selling pressure remains. This is structural turnover, not a full bullish reversal.
Conclusion: In the short term, BTC will likely oscillate repeatedly between 76,000 and 79,000. Don't rush to go all-in on the dip, and don't chase shorts near 76,000. Wait for two signals: a break below 76,000 with continued rise in leveraged positions, indicating increased downside risk; or a break above 80,300 with amplified short liquidations, indicating the bearish view is invalidated. On the macro side, oil prices breaking 110 and post-midterm election expectations on Iran will also suppress risk appetite, so don't be too optimistic about the rebound. After learning quantitative analysis, I developed a new habit: whenever I see "executed monthly," I want to create a data column for it. If I were to write a strategy, I would first set the rules: if the buyback and burn are continuously fulfilled and the funding source can be verified, then increase the observation priority instead of directly generating a trading signal.🤖
Cronos Network announced that it has completed the first execution of the monthly burn mechanism, buying back and burning 1,791,534.14 $CRO. The mechanism uses trading fees from the Ult platform to buy back CRO, while the token issuance fees from Cronos Launch are entirely burned after conversion.
My judgment is that this adds credibility to the mechanism but is still insufficient to prove a sustained change on the supply side. The rule has moved from plan to execution, at least providing a verifiable sample; the linkage between funds and platform business also leaves clues for subsequent observation, which is more useful than just looking at the wording of announcements.
The flaws are also obvious: the first execution provides only one data point, so no trend can be inferred; looking at the burn amount alone without supply as the denominator makes it impossible to judge the intensity. If the fee scale and the coin price at buyback fluctuate, then the burn amount may also vary accordingly, which is a misjudgment I want to avoid.
Therefore, I want to record "executed on schedule" and "burn ratio" separately, not merge them into a single positive indicator. If you were to write this observation condition, would you require several consecutive periods of fulfillment to consider it passed? What additional filtering criteria would you add?After-hours saw a big bearish candle, with Intel directly hammered down 22%, the market voting with its feet. Chen Liwu also laid it out: PC demand is weak, but memory prices are soaring wildly, and this gap might not be filled until the first half of 2027. The essence is simple—AI computing power is popping champagne, while traditional PCs are fixing the roof. A couple of years ago, everyone was hyping the “storage super cycle,” but now the aftereffects have arrived: upstream players like SK Hy我把 CoinGecko 上几家平台的成交量拉出来对了一下，没那么简单。 Uniswap V3（以太坊）现在 24 小时成交是平时的 12.9 倍，看着很夸张。但增量几乎全挤在 04:00–10:00，光 04:00–05:00 这一小时，就比前一天同一小时多出约 1 万枚 BTC 等值，相当于它平时 3 天的量。 那几个小时，正是黑客把 USDT 和山寨币往 ETH 里换、套利盘疯狂搬砖的时候。 10:00 以后曲线就平了。10:00–15:00 这 5 小时，和昨天同时段比，Uniswap 只多了约 2,600 枚 BTC 的成交，OKX 多了约 6,400 枚，Coinbase 多了约 4,650 枚。 我的看法：今天 DEX 的天量，主要是黑客和搬砖盘做出来的，不能直接当成用户搬家的证据。眼下接住币安外溢的，更多是 OKX 和 Coinbase。DEX 能不能真把人留住，要等提现重开、黑客停手以后再看一周。 你这两天把币挪去了哪：别的交易所，还是链上自己拿着？#闪迪Q1营收同比增378%，Q2营收指引强劲 $SNDK $BTC $ETH
The market is likely to open lower tonight, under pressure and with weak volatility.
The earnings report itself is flawless: Q1 revenue was $11.03 billion, a year-over-year surge of 378%, with adjusted EPS of $49.51, both exceeding expectations; data center revenue hit $4.8 billion, soaring 1682% year-over-year; Q2 guidance of $12.2-12.6 billion also surpasses market expectations. However, the stock price followed the typical "good news priced in" script—during normal trading on Thursday, it fell 5.32% to close at $1330, after-hours earnings release initially pushed it up but then it reversed downward, finally dropping another 3.8% after hours to around $1279. Even the "1-for-8" stock split benefit couldn't support the stock price.
More critically, sector-wide drag: storage stocks fell broadly pre-market, SK Hynix dropped over 6%, Micron and Western Digital also weakened, and SanDisk fell over 4% pre-market. Evercore ISI also cut its price target from $2800 to $2500 pre-market, further dampening sentiment.
Forecast: Tonight's open will likely be in the $1270-$1300 range, down about 2%-4%. If the price cannot quickly reclaim the $1300 whole number after opening, it may trigger short-term stop-loss orders, seeking support near $1244 (0.618 Fibonacci retracement level). The mid-to-long-term AI storage logic remains intact, but short-term valuation pressure to digest is much greater than the earnings report's positive impact.$BTC Bitcoin is currently at a critical juncture of intense bullish and bearish contention: the price is struggling around $80,000, capped above by heavy historical trapped positions, while supported below by structural adjustments in institutional funds, but increased macro correlation makes it difficult to break into an independent trend. Price resistance: the "ceiling" at $87,000 In the short term, Bitcoin's rebound potential is limited. On-chain data shows that over the past two years, a large number of investors' holding costs are concentrated at $87,000 and above. Whenever the price approaches this area, sell pressure to break even emerges, which has twice suppressed rallies this year, often followed by corrections of 25% or deeper. The prediction market also shows that the probability of reaching $100,000 within the year is only 17%. Fund structure: arbitrage retreat and sovereign buy-in Institutional funds are not fully withdrawing but rather "turning over": • Hedge funds reducing holdings: Due to narrowing arbitrage between spot and futures (annualized premium dropping from 7.9% to 4.8%), nine institutions including Goldman Sachs and Millennium have reduced ETF holdings by about 68,000 BTC. • Sovereign funds increasing holdings: Morgan Stanley Asset Management, Abu Dhabi sovereign funds, and others have bought about 20,000 BTC against the trend, indicating long-term capital is still allocating. • ETF funds returning: On October 29 alone, a net inflow of $137 million occurred, marking three consecutive days of inflows, barely bringing the cumulative October capital#加密行业协同守护资产安全
Korean, Hong Kong, and A-shares Closing Comments (October 30): One Google Negative, Three Markets, Three Different Reactions
Google's earnings hit Asia-Pacific hard, but the impact varies greatly.
Korean stocks really took a hit.
KOSPI closed at 5730.74, down 3.48%, dipping below 5600 intraday. KOSPI 200 futures dropped over 5%, triggering a sell-off circuit breaker. Foreign investors net sold 1.617 trillion KRW on the main board. SK Hynix fell 7.08%, Samsung Electronics down 3.02%. Semiconductor weighting is too high; even fleeing couldn't help. Only pharmaceuticals and Samsung Biologics bucked the trend, with money fleeing chips into medicine.
Hong Kong stocks held on briefly but couldn't sustain.
The Hang Seng Index surged over 300 points in early trading, supported by AIA, platform stocks, and domestic demand; but in the afternoon it followed A-shares down, ultimately failing to hold 23,000. Southbound funds saw a net outflow for the 12th consecutive day, totaling -3.36 billion HKD. SMIC, Alibaba, and CNOOC were the top net sellers. The tech-heavy index dropped nearly 3%, with AI hardware still hammered.
A-shares were the most divided.
The Shanghai Composite fell 1.44%, losing 3600, while the ChiNext dropped 4.13%. However, Baijiu saw a net inflow of 2.5 billion RMB, with Luzhou Laojiao, Gujing, and Huangtai hitting daily limits. CPO and PCB sectors continued to collapse, with Xinyi Sheng down 14.2%. Sentiment readings plunged to a freezing 20.2.
Korean stocks are the true eye of the storm, Hong Kong stocks a weak safe haven, and A-shares are self-destructing.Is the sideways rebound like the calm before the storm? After last night's surge, will today be another bull trap?
From a bearish perspective, BTC's sideways movement around $77,980 is not a strong buildup but more like a breather after a decline. The 24-hour high-low range has stretched to $76,500—$81,971, yet the price has returned near the lower end, indicating weak support above.
Technically, bulls have little confidence: the daily MACD remains in a death cross with weakening bars; the super trend stays downward, and both MA7 and MA25 are above the price. Although RSI(6) is only 24.62, entering the short-term oversold zone, which may trigger a rebound, oversold conditions only indicate a slowdown in the decline, not an end to the downtrend.
The futures side also warrants caution: the funding rate remains positive, meaning longs are still paying; according to open interest value, top traders hold about 63.25% long positions, but open contracts have decreased by 0.49% in the past hour. If the price rebounds but open interest does not expand, it looks more like longs reducing positions on the bounce rather than a new trend starting.
Yesterday's news was somewhat positive, but the market did not sustain strength. For me, a true recovery requires the price to firmly hold above short- and mid-term moving averages, volume to increase, and open interest to rise simultaneously; otherwise, today's rebound should still be seen as a probe within a weak structure, not trend confirmation.
The above is market analysis only and does not constitute investment advice. Today's trend is indeed weak; the short position at 4013 succeeded, taking profit at 3975.
The long position arranged around 3970, I believe, can still be held. As long as it is not stopped out, I will consider holding it over the weekend.
The current market can be understood as a pullback to support near 3975, a false break below the previous low followed by a rebound, which is a relatively good double-foot stepping pattern. However, it is still early for a bullish market. If it goes up, I will still look for opportunities to set up short positions.Can small capital work, and is it the same for large capital?
When I see a method that yields results with small capital, I don’t simply multiply the profits by ten and imagine how it would perform if the capital were increased tenfold.
Because when the order size grows, the execution conditions might change as well. What used to be filled at one price level might now require consuming several levels; what used to exit quickly might now take longer.
Especially for some opportunities that are inherently small in scale, if more capital participates, the original advantage might be eaten up by transaction costs.
I will re-examine: how much capital this method can accommodate each time, how long execution takes, and how the costs of entering and exiting change. If order splitting is needed, I also consider what might happen to the market during the waiting period.
At the same time, a few small orders completing smoothly does not prove the method is effective. Whether the strategy itself has an edge, and how much capital that edge can support, are two things that both need verification.
When you see profit records from small capital, do you also consider whether it can still be executed under the original conditions when scaled up?#StrategyQ3ProfitSurges Strategy This earnings report is indeed impressive, with quarterly net profit reaching a new high and significant contributions from digital asset income.
However, I believe the real focus should not be on how high the book profit is, but whether the company's liabilities and financing capabilities can withstand pressure when Bitcoin prices pull back.
In the short term, it's about sentiment; in the long term, it's about the balance sheet. Hyperliquid $HYPE went from 25% to 43% of all perp DEX volume in nine months
Last time this thing fired HYPE did a 2x.
Would be pretty fucking funny if it happens again
Let's wait and watch What I care most about is not the departure date, but that during Li Bo's tenure, he led the introduction of the IMF's first corporate risk management policy and roadmap. Now that his term is ending and a successor has been proposed, let's consider the worst-case scenario: if the market interprets the personnel change as a loosening of stablecoin regulation, then sentiment might run ahead while the rules remain unchanged. This is my risk assessment, not a change that has already occurred.
Having worked in risk control, my judgment on this kind of news is: the policy signals are limited and cannot be directly taken as positive news. ⚠️ First, an individual's resume does not equal the institution's next policy step; second, even if regulatory expectations improve, that does not guarantee the reserve quality and redemption capability of stablecoins. These are what truly relate to the risks users bear.
A practical reminder for ordinary people: consolidate your exposure to the same stablecoin across different products; do not mistake dispersed storage for diversified risk. I will wait for the specific policy text and will not add drama to personnel news.Among the whole market, 17 rose and 72 fell, yet the top spot in trading volume managed to pull back from -8% to break even with huge volume. $ZEC was still hanging at -8.06% in the morning with a turnover of 306 million, a typical drop with increased volume; recalculated at 16:25 in the afternoon with the same criteria: turnover reached 321 million, the highest in the market, price closed flat at +0.6%, intraday moved from 1182→1398 then back to 1252. Over 300 million in turnover, resulting in a flat close.
In contrast, $HYPE: +15.6%, turnover 203 million (only 165 million in the morning), the only large-cap stock rising with volume in the market. $BTC was still hovering around 78,000, fearing a greedy 30.
My stance: This is not a sell-off for ZEC, but a genuine turnover between bulls and bears—bought back at 1252 after falling to 1182. If the sellers had won, the close wouldn't be flat. The opposing view is always "volume rising but price stagnating means selling." The judgment condition is clear: breaking 1182 = sell-off confirmed, holding above = new funds taking over.
The above is my personal market observation, data as of today, not investment advice; crypto assets are highly volatile, please make independent judgments and bear your own risks (DYOR).
Will ZEC break 1182 or not? Which side are you on? #欧意Orbit #CryptoMarket #CapitalFlowRecently, international gold prices have continued to weaken. Although there is still safe-haven support from geopolitical factors, under the combined pressure of macro expectations, U.S. Treasury bonds, and the U.S. dollar, gold has entered a correction phase. The market is re-pricing the Federal Reserve's interest rate maintenance path.
From the core drivers, first, high interest rate expectations suppress gold prices. Gold is a zero-coupon asset and does not generate interest. The U.S. economy shows strong resilience, and inflation remains sticky, leading the market to trade on the expectation of "high interest rates maintained for a longer period." The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield remains high, and funds prefer to choose interest-bearing U.S. Treasuries, diverting allocation funds away from precious metals.
Second, the strengthening U.S. dollar puts pressure on gold priced in dollars. The U.S. dollar index has risen in phases, increasing the cost for investors from other global economies to buy gold, weakening physical and asset allocation demand.
It is worth noting that this round of geopolitical events has not formed a sustained safe-haven rally. The market worries that conflicts will push up energy prices and further boost inflation, which instead strengthens expectations for the Fed to maintain tightening. The safe-haven support from geopolitics is offset by the negative impact from interest rates.
On the capital side, after gold prices broke key support levels, gold ETFs saw capital outflows. Coupled with some institutions stopping losses and adjusting positions, this further amplified the gold correction.
Currently, the market focus remains on U.S. inflation, employment data, and Federal Reserve officials' statements. If inflation significantly declines later, the market will re-trade rate cut expectations and U.S. Treasury yields will fall, giving gold a chance to recover; if inflation remains stubborn, gold prices are likely to continue facing pressure. $XAU Franklin Templeton's 5% initial Bitcoin exposure puts BTC inside an equity-led allocation, while VanEck's 1%-5% band makes the crypto sleeve explicitly adjustable. That distinction matters: one approach may compound exposure through dividends; the other can respond to portfolio limits. Neither tells us yet whether investors will add meaningful new BTC demand.
#VanEckFranklinBTCETFs Liquidations: Over 500 million liquidated in the past 24 hours, with long positions liquidated at 407 million and short positions only over 90 million. This round mainly targets washing out the longs. On the 1-hour and 4-hour charts, long liquidations also dominate.
Looking at the whales: the nominal long-short ratio is only 23.03%, with the number of traders and position sizes on the short side far exceeding the longs. Both sides have unrealized losses, but the profit ratio on shorts reaches 60.88%, while longs are only at 29.15%.
Overall network long-short ratio: shorts account for 51.63%, longs 48.37%, indicating the market positions are biased toward shorts. The funding rate is still positive, and there is still capital willing to hold longs.
Simple summary: longs are currently being heavily cleaned out, large holders dominate the shorts, and there is no sufficient data signal suitable for direct bottom fishing.
$BTC When the same candlestick hits both take profit and stop loss, which triggers first?
When reviewing contracts, there is one situation I mark separately: when the highest and lowest prices of the same candlestick cover both the take profit and stop loss levels.
Suppose you hold a long position at 100, with a stop loss at 95 and take profit at 105. This candlestick’s high is 108 and low is 92. Based on these numbers alone, you can’t determine which triggered first.
Whether the price went up first then down, or down first then up, could lead to completely different outcomes for this position.
So I don’t just see the high exceeding take profit and count it as a winning trade. I look for data from smaller timeframes or transaction records, verify whether the order was active at that time, what trigger price was used, and the actual execution details.
If the data is still insufficient to determine the sequence, I will note it as uncertain and won’t default to the outcome more favorable to the result.
In backtesting, whether a trade is counted as a win or loss sometimes hinges on these details.
When you review trades, do you check the price sequence within a single candlestick?Afternoon market scan, the most heartbreaking thing is that this rebound's "gold content" is seriously insufficient. On the macro front, U.S. Treasury yields continue to soar combined with unresolved Middle East risks, plus consecutive earnings shocks in U.S. stocks dragging down risk appetite, resulting in extremely strong risk-off sentiment.
BTC is currently around 78,900, down 2.8% in 24 hours, with daily short- and mid-term moving averages forming a complete bearish alignment. The short positions are densely suppressed around 81,561 above; below, long position liquidations reach as high as $1.9 billion at 76,707. 80,000 is the psychological defense line; if the close cannot hold above it, the rebound is just a paper tiger. ETH is at 2,268, down 4%, RSI approaching oversold, but the 2,300-2,320 area is immediate resistance and liquidation zone; failure to hold means a continuation of the downtrend. SOL is at 96.66, having fallen below the 100 mark, indicators oversold but momentum stalled. 102.05 is the watershed; failure to reclaim it means bears remain in control. ETF data is straightforward: BTC inflow of 135 million, ETH outflow of 21.11 million, SOL weekly outflow of 24.8 million, institutional funds are rotating back to safe assets.
Strategy-wise, do not chase shorts this afternoon nor catch falling knives. BTC closely watches the 79,966 liquidation zone; if broken, follow the trend down to 76,707; on a rebound, expect resistance at 80,500-81,000 and consider light short positions. ETH waits for a 2,300-2,320 rebound to confirm selling pressure, defend at 2,350. SOL failing to reclaim 102.05 means any rebound is an escape opportunity. Macro is hawkish; preserving principal is key to surviving the cold winter. Earnings beat expectations but still sold off! SanDisk pulls back after earnings, storage sector faces expected test
US storage giant SanDisk (SNDK) released its latest quarterly earnings as scheduled, with revenue and profit metrics exceeding market consensus expectations. However, after the earnings release, the stock price did not rise but instead declined, showing a typical "earnings sell-off" pattern, sparking market discussions about the sustainability of the AI storage cycle.
The market voted with its feet, with core disagreements focused on four main dimensions:
First, next quarter's guidance failed to meet optimistic expectations. Although this quarter's earnings met targets, management's guidance for subsequent revenue and gross margin did not reach the market's highest premium expectations. Investors began to worry that gross margin expansion is nearing its peak and that the fastest phase of NAND price increases may be over.
Second, positive factors were priced in advance, leading to profit-taking. Before the earnings release, the market had already priced in the benefits of AI storage long-term contracts and flash memory shortages, resulting in a significant prior stock price increase; the earnings report did not bring unexpected new catalysts, so profit-taking occurred at high levels.
Third, long-term concerns about the strong storage cycle. The storage sector naturally has strong cyclical characteristics, and capital has begun to anticipate the pressure from future capacity releases. The market worries that new capacity coming online will reverse the current tight supply-demand balance and suppress future NAND prices.
Fourth, sector sentiment resonance drags down performance. The storage sector is highly correlated, with SK Hynix, Micron, Western Digital, and other storage stocks simultaneously under pressure. Coupled with volatility in the US tech market, this further amplified SanDisk's pullback.BTC keeps dropping but more people are buying the dip, while HYPE keeps rising but more people are shorting! In today's market, the biggest fear is picking the wrong side.
$BTC fell 2.4% in 24 hours, hitting a low of 76,443. But more worth noting than the overall market's rise and fall is the completely different long-short structures of several coins.
First, look at $HYPE — the shorts are truly stunned.
It surged as much as 16% in 24 hours, reaching a high of 96.70. The price rose from 79 to 96, but OKX's long-short ratio dropped from 2.06 to 0.725, meaning more people are shorting as it rises.
As a result, about $20 million in short positions were liquidated in 24 hours. Coupled with ICE partnership news and increased trading activity, the market was pushed upward directly.
But $UNI is the exact opposite.
The price fell from 7.50 to 6.27, yet the long-short ratio is still 2.07, and 92% of liquidations in 24 hours were longs.
The lower the price falls, the more leveraged longs refuse to admit defeat. This kind of structure is most vulnerable to further drops.
BTC's long-short ratio is 2.11, ETH's is 2.58, and SOL's is 2.83; these three major coins have similar issues. The market is falling, but long positions remain crowded, so buying the dip carries significant risk.
My judgment is simple:
HYPE has had a run-up, so don't chase it for now; wait for a pullback.
UNI, BTC, ETH, and SOL are not urgent to buy the dip yet; watch for resistance on the rebound first. $PEPE Binance was hacked this time, and basically all stablecoins have been frozen, the ones suffering the most are the altcoins.
Checked the hacker's address on-chain, $PEPE, $UNI, and $LINK should have all been dumped;
Currently large amounts of altcoins that haven't been dumped/sold off yet:
• 173 million $ENA (about 30.47 million USD)
• 2.059 million $AVAX (about 17.02 million USD)
• 74.56 million $ARB (about 11.52 million USD)
Brothers holding these tokens, please be cautious and hedge your risks.