Orbit Post Sitemap
Conclusion first: $CC peaked at 0.1051 in the last 24 hours, currently at 0.0958. The day with the loudest institutional narrative, yet the coin price is green.
On October 29, Nasdaq-listed Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) announced a partnership with TSV to start tokenizing and trading its own stock on the Canton network from November 2, with on-chain transfer agent Fairmint issuing the tokens. On the same day, the Canton Foundation granted RedStone 15.8 million CC (about $1.55 million) as an open-source pricing standard.
Three wallet numbers:
First, on-chain scale. According to DefiLlama, Canton chain TVL is only $13.24 million, while $CC market cap is $3.83 billion.
Second, this batch of 15.8 million CC gifted is less than one-third of the daily perpetual $CC trading volume on OKX (5.45 million).
Third, leverage hasn’t caught up. Perpetual 24h volume is 5.45 million, spot 3.24 million, ratio 1.7x; open interest only $2.71 million; funding rate -0.000009%.
The news triggered a 1H spike to 0.1051, then dumped back to 0.0947 at 4 AM.
The narrative is for institutions, $CC is for retail buyers. Which do you believe? I even suspect that Binance is orchestrating this whole thing! $BTC $BNB
Here's the script scenario:
- Dump down to 71-73k to complete accumulation
- Election benefits realized, price rebounds back near 80k
- After the election settles, another dump occurs, completing the transfer of chips from retail investors to exchanges/institutions.
The market may not follow this script exactly, but this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. Ethereum $ETH: The weakest among the mainstreams, be cautious of further declines
ETH fell below 2,300, dropping over 5% in 24 hours, with a nearly 13% decline in the past 30 days, marking the weakest October performance since 2018.
Core logic: Besides the overall market drag, ETH faces two internal issues: whales are continuously selling (reducing about 160,000 ETH within a few days), and exchange balances are simultaneously increasing, indicating more sellable chips. Meanwhile, the testnet "Glamsterdam" upgrade has been delayed, removing a short-term catalyst from the market. Analysts' downside targets point to around $2,000.
Key levels: 2,385 has shifted from support to resistance; failing to reclaim it makes stabilization difficult; below, watch 2,200 first, with an extreme case at 2,000.
Today's decline is primarily driven by liquidity panic triggered by the Binance hack, not by any fundamental issues with a specific coin. But in a panic market, "cheap" is not a reason to buy; "stop-fall signals" are. The long positions in your screenshot generally have costs above the current price. The immediate priority is to control position size and leverage, then wait for $BTC to hold 76,500 and for a clear reduction in market liquidations before judging whether it is a rebound recovery or a weakening trend.
The above is a market review and logical analysis, not investment advice. Contract trading carries very high risk; please control your position size carefully.
$SOL #加密行业协同守护资产安全 To calculate, $30 billion is three times $10 billion, but according to Saylor, it is still supported by the existing balance sheet. What concerns me is: if the same balance sheet can create more credit, does that also mean heavier repayment pressure, rather than just a larger coin purchasing capacity?
① $30 billion is the credit limit figure he gave during the Q3 earnings call. I interpret it as management's judgment on financing capability, not the actual financing results that have been realized.
② From $10 billion, $20 billion to $30 billion, the limits increase step by step. Quantifying from another perspective, if the credit scale expands without a corresponding strengthening of the asset base, then the importance of repayment arrangements will also increase. This is my speculation; the material does not provide specific terms.
③ He said there is no need for new common stock financing, nor does Bitcoin need to appreciate further, to create this credit using the existing balance sheet. I think this is attractive to common stock shareholders, but no new common stock financing does not mean there are no other financing costs.
My judgment is that the more important significance of this news lies in the financing structure, not the coin purchasing amount itself. The headline is big, but I want to first clearly understand the cost, term, and repayment arrangements of the credit instruments; before these are explained, I will not directly count the financing capability as the company's safety margin.Loracle is acting up again!
This guy today aggressively shorted nearly $48 million, wildly shorting $ETH (over $22 million), Nvidia, NEAR, and PEPE, not even sparing Oracle. Looks like a pure big short, right? But when you check his cards, wow, he's holding tightly onto 718 long $BTC positions! The cost price is as high as 84,948, currently enduring nearly $5 million in unrealized losses! You could say the shorts are making some pocket money while the longs are bleeding heavily.
What's even more interesting is that his total long positions are over $77 million, shorts over $75 million, almost evenly split, with an overall unrealized loss of $10 million. What kind of advanced hedging is this? I feel like his big $BTC longs won't make it through... This morning, after all $ETH long positions were liquidated, the trader deposited funds again to go long.
His ETH long position was liquidated in one go during the market drop triggered by the Binance hack this morning.
By the afternoon, the address recharged 250,000 USDC to re-enter the long position, currently holding a total long position valued at $5.88 million, including ETH, $HYPE, and $BTC.
He still maintains a high-leverage style, with the liquidation price for the ETH position very close to the current price, at $2161, only $86 away from the current price.
This account has been high-frequency trading on Hyperliquid for nearly a year and a half, with a cumulative trading volume of $15.86 billion and an overall loss of $37.05 million.
On-chain address:
0x020cA66C30beC2c4Fe3861a94E4DB4A498A35872 October 30 Crypto Evening Report
The liquidation data looks quite painful
The whole network's 24-hour liquidation is roughly between 1.1 billion and 1.5 billion USD (different platforms have varying statistics), with about 180,000 to 240,000 people liquidated.
The most heartbreaking part is that long positions accounted for the absolute majority; $BTC alone liquidated over 500 million, $ETH over 300 million. Those who rushed in to bottom-fish yesterday were very likely liquidated again today.
The black swan event is still unfolding
Hot wallets were hacked, involving a large amount, but the official side has already frozen about 3 billion USD. The platform is bearing all losses, so user funds are safe. Deposits and withdrawals are temporarily suspended, and security checks are ongoing.
There are actually signs of divergence in the funding side
BTC spot ETFs have had net inflows for three consecutive days, totaling 424 million USD, turning October from net outflow to net inflow of 111 million.
However, ETH ETFs are still seeing outflows, with a cumulative 1.35 billion running out in October. The divergence between the two assets is very clear. On-chain, some whales are buying on the dip; a newly created wallet received 1,900 BTC from Galaxy Digital, worth 148 million USD.
In summary: The black swan event washed out the bulls, but ETFs are buying, whales are accumulating, and sentiment is extremely pessimistic.
At times like this, chasing shorts risks a rebound, while bottom-fishing risks catching a falling knife.
My personal view is to keep watching, wait for the black swan event to settle and weekend sentiment to digest, then look at next week's direction.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 $INTC, is the operational improvement driven by sustainable product competitiveness? The Q3 earnings report is a window to observe the product cycle, foundry investments, and profit recovery. The growth in AI server demand has also raised market expectations for supply capacity. Quarterly revenue or guidance cannot replace yield rates, advanced process customers, and free cash flow. If gross margin, foundry orders, and cash flow continue to improve, the credibility of the transformation increases; if capital expenditures rise while external customers and yield progress lag, the rebound may still be a leading indicator of the cycle.This drop hit 76,000, and outside there's a chorus of wails; some panic sell, some rush to buy the dip, both easily getting slapped from both sides.
As usual, let's start with the conclusion: don't rush to catch the falling knife on the futures side, flying knives cut hands, seen it too many times. But at this spot on the spot market, it's worth keeping a close eye.
Why say the 76,000 level is special? The weekly EMA21 and EMA25 moving averages are resting right here, and the daily EMA144 and EMA169 are also converging, multi-timeframe resonance support, not something easily broken through.
Looking back at the last bear market: a big bullish candle pulled up to the second high, followed by a roughly 20% correction, bottoming after nine weeks. The last second high was 31,000, corrected down to 24,700. This time the second high is 87,400, a 20% cut lands roughly near 70,000, and now it's only the fifth week, time hasn't fully passed.
In terms of pattern, the weekly chart has a good chance of forming an inverse head and shoulders, and the long-term MA200 is slowly moving up, supporting the bottom lift.
So on the spot side, the 70,000 to 75,000 range can be watched for building positions in batches, don't go all in at once, bottoming requires patience. If it hasn't reached the spot, just wait; itchy hands get hit easily. $BTC $ETH #美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 $BCH Damn it! This BCH shakeout has made my scalp tingle. At the 284.52 level, the dog whales are clearly making moves behind the scenes. Brothers, don't panic, it's not a big problem. From a pure technical perspective, volume is quietly increasing, and the candlesticks have been consolidating at the bottom for three days. Smart money is obviously positioning. Around 284.52, you can try a light long position, set stop loss at 278, and take profit target at 300 first. This move is stable, don't chase the highs. If you want to follow, check the market depth on the lower trading card, don't wait until it pumps and then ask me. What do you think? 👇👇👇#闪迪Q1营收同比增378%，Q2营收指引强劲 My judgment: SanDisk's earnings report is very strong, and next quarter's guidance also supports continued growth; however, the profit margin is already extremely high, so current profitability cannot be directly regarded as a long-term norm.
**What I most agree with is the signal of continued growth.** Next quarter's revenue guidance is $12.2 billion to $12.6 billion, with adjusted EPS of $55 to $57, both higher than this quarter; the data center is the main growth driver. The above EPS figures are based on pre-stock split metrics. Company guidance
**What I am most cautious about is mistaking cyclical high profits for permanent profits.** This quarter's gross margin reached 85%, but consumer business revenue declined 29% quarter-over-quarter, indicating not all demand is strong. Going forward, we need to watch NAND prices, customer inventory, and supply expansion to judge how long high profits can be maintained. Business and profit margin details
**Therefore, I am moderately positive on operations but remain cautious about chasing the rally.** The key is not how much was earned this quarter, but whether the stock price has already priced in sustained high future profitability; you cannot just annualize the current EPS to calculate the P/E ratio and conclude it is cheap.A nominal position of $885,500 caught my eye, and I immediately felt that familiar vibe from the previous round: when the number is big enough, it's easy to imagine "big players are bullish" as "big players are confident." This trade is Core Trader 15 going long on $MU with 10x leverage, but the outcome is not yet known.
Last time, I was more easily swayed by the amount, but this time I'm more focused on what it hasn't told me. The nominal value is the exposure amplified by leverage, not the actual principal put up; without knowing the overall wallet funds, I can't judge how significant this trade really is for them. The same amount could be the main position or just a small trial.
So I only take this as a clear long action, not as proof of heavy confidence. Do veteran players feel the same familiarity? When you encounter such a large position opening, what additional information do you check before you accept that they are making a heavy bet? #亚马逊Q3营收略逊预期，AWS增速达近五年最快水平 My assessment: Amazon's Q3 core operations performed well, AWS is very strong, but the pressure on cash flow from AI investments is already quite evident, overall cautiously positive.
I agree on two points:
- **AWS growth is supported by profits.** Cloud business operating profit reached $17.8 billion, indicating demand is converting into profitability.
- **Net profit decline does not mean core business is worse.** Last year's same period included a $9.5 billion pre-tax gain from Anthropic investment, which is missing this year as a comparative base; looking at this quarter's operations, operating profit and margin actually improved. Financial report details
My biggest concern is cash flow. Free cash flow over the past 12 months was a net outflow of $42.4 billion, mainly due to AI infrastructure investments; the company still expects full-year cash capital expenditures of about $220 billion. This is not a single Q3 outflow, nor can the risk of investment returns be ignored just because of AWS's high growth. Cash flow and expenditure guidance
My view: business competitiveness remains strong, but whether the stock is worth buying depends on whether future AWS profit growth can gradually improve free cash flow. Currently, supporting "continue to be optimistic about the business" is not enough to conclude "worth chasing the rise" based solely on the financial report.The triple blow causing BTC to fall below 80,000: Binance incident + interest rate hike expectations + leverage liquidation — which one is the real culprit?
This round of BTC's rapid drop below 80,000 is a resonance of three negative factors, but their roles are completely different: the Binance security incident is the direct trigger, interest rate hike expectations are the underlying suppression, and leverage liquidation is the amplifier of the decline.
In the early morning, Binance's hot wallet experienced an abnormal transfer of assets worth tens of billions, prompting the platform to urgently suspend deposits and withdrawals, awakening the market's historical fear of exchange runs. The spot risk-averse funds fled first, becoming the direct driver piercing the market surface. Prior to this, the high US Treasury yields and the market's fluctuating expectations of rate cuts, along with ongoing concerns about rate hikes, continuously suppressed global risk asset valuations. Bitcoin itself was already in a fragile state with weak buying pressure, which is the underlying background of the market pressure.
After the price broke through the critical 80,000 mark, leverage liquidation kicked in: a large number of long contracts concentrated at this level triggered automatic forced liquidations, causing a continuous surge of sell orders, forming a multi-long kill negative feedback loop that further amplified the pullback, dropping to around 77,000 within just a few hours. Small-cap narrative coins like CORE, FOGO, and ARB experienced much greater volatility than BTC. It is necessary to distinguish the primary from the secondary: without Binance's sudden black swan event, interest rate hike expectations would only cause a slow correction, making a short-term sharp drop unlikely; without high leverage, panic shocks would not cause such a rapid decline. In summary: interest rate hike expectations are the long-term baseline, the Binance incident is the detonator, and leverage liquidation is the direct driver smashing the deep drop.
#btc#core#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 My judgment: Intel's Q3 operations improved significantly, but the Q4 guidance cooled down. It's still too early to say "a full reversal has occurred." **What I agree with is that the improvement is already reflected in operating profit.** GAAP operating margin rose from 5% in the same period last year to 15.3%, indicating that this quarter's progress is supported by operations. However, GAAP net profit still declined by 18% year-over-year, so adjusted profit growth should not be confused with net profit growth. Financial details **My biggest concern is that growth and profit margin will both decline next quarter.** Q4 revenue guidance is $15 billion to $16 billion, lower than Q3; adjusted gross margin is expected to drop from 44.1% to 38%, and adjusted EPS is expected to fall from $0.52 to $0.25. Management also expects PC weakness to last at least until the first half of next year. Company guidance Additionally, growth in foundry revenue cannot be directly taken as a breakthrough with external customers: this segment includes internal transactions, so external orders, mass production progress, and loss narrowing still need to be observed. Therefore, my attitude is cautiously positive: the server business is worth watching, but next quarter still needs to prove that the profit margin decline is only temporary. Based on this earnings report alone, I would not directly conclude that "the stock is worth chasing higher." Binance was just hacked, and Musk and CZ ended up chatting about their assets in the comments 😂
Musk first posted "Everyday is Zeroday," then followed up with a grimacing emoji
CZ couldn't sit still and replied directly:
Elon, I respect you a lot, but now is really not the time for jokes
Then he shifted the topic, mentioning the $500 million investment in Musk's acquisition of Twitter back then, and the $SPCX shares now worth over $1 billion, hoping Musk would give some support
Even more interesting was He Yi's reply:
"Reporting to the major shareholder, our revenue this year is enough to cover this loss, so there's no need to sell the SpaceX shares you favor for now"
CZ quickly explained: Who said we want to sell? Just showing that we still have some assets he's familiar with, so he doesn't worry so much 😂
At this point, I really couldn't hold back
Clearly, Musk was teasing Binance, but CZ countered by bringing up their investment relationship, and He Yi then showcased the company's financial strength
In just a few sentences, they turned a major security incident into a casual squabble between shareholders
Of course, jokes aside, a $6.3 billion asset risk is no small matter
But from this conversation, CZ and He Yi at least want to send a signal:
Binance was hit hard this time, but the assets are still there, far from the point of needing to sell SpaceX stock to survive
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 AWS rises 39% to hit fastest growth in five years, but Amazon's stock fell over 11% after hours
AWS revenue $45.98 billion, up 39.3% year-over-year, marking the fastest growth in nearly five years
Operating profit $28.08 billion, up 61.5% year-over-year, with a record-high profit margin of 13.9%
Good data didn't bring a good reaction; the sell-off came from the other side of the ledger
Quarterly capital expenditure $77.26 billion, far exceeding the expected $57.47 billion
Free cash flow over the past 12 months shifted from an inflow of $14.79 billion last year to an outflow of $42.36 billion
The company still maintains a capital expenditure guidance of $220 billion for 2026, with plans to increase it further in 2027
Q4 revenue guidance is $240 billion to $247 billion, also below market expectations
The day before, Google fell 12.64% in a single day for the same reason; the AI cash burn is being repriced
I think this is not about cloud failure, but the market no longer willing to pay upfront for burning; the key level to watch is AWS's backlog of $578 billion converting into actual revenue accelerating, or free cash flow stopping its outflow
Continue burning cash for growth, or recover first?
$AMZN $GOOGL
#亚马逊Q3营收略逊预期，AWS增速达近五年最快水平 #StrategyQ3 net profit hits a record high for a single quarter, with significant contribution from digital asset gains My view: This financial report shows that Bitcoin's rise strongly amplifies Strategy's profits, but "net profit hitting a record high" should not be interpreted as a substantial increase in core business profitability.
- **Profits mainly come from Bitcoin valuation gains.** Q3 net profit was about $19.53 billion, with digital asset gains around $20.91 billion; meanwhile, revenue was only $125.4 million, down 3% year-over-year. Accounting profit is valid but does not equal receiving the same amount in cash, and will fluctuate inversely with coin prices later. Company financial report
- **I care more about whether common shareholders truly benefit.** As of October 25, the coin holdings increased by 26% year-to-date, but the company's BTC Yield measuring per-share coin change was -3.7%. This metric is not a return on investment but reminds us that an increase in total coin holdings does not mean an increase in Bitcoin per share. Company disclosure
- **Cash payment pressure still needs separate consideration.** This quarter's preferred stock dividends were about $420 million; the company has sold some Bitcoin during the year to pay dividends and repurchase preferred stock. No matter how high the book profit is, it cannot replace cash sources. Company financial report
Therefore, I am cautiously positive about this performance but will not chase the price solely based on profit records. To judge whether MSTR is worth buying, the key factors are Bitcoin's trend, per-share coin changes, and the premium of the stock price relative to net assets after deducting debt and preferred stock equity. After experiencing a sharp intraday sell-off in the evening session, the market barely maintained a weak rebound. The combination of macroeconomic bearish factors and a series of hacker attacks has caused extreme panic in market sentiment, leaving bulls powerless to organize an effective counterattack.
$BTC｜77673: After breaking below 80,000, it dipped to 76,519 and is currently weakly oscillating. The most fatal bearish factor is the hacker splitting a massive amount of BTC into 19 wallets, which could trigger a dump at any time. The 80,000 level above has become a very strong resistance; avoid blindly chasing a volume-less rebound.
$ETH｜2244: After dipping to 2,174, it rebounded, with a drop exceeding 5%. The extremely surreal event is that the Pando Rings hacker just spent $16.72 million to buy 7,548 ETH. Although the hacker's bottom-fishing provides some localized buying pressure, the overall weakness remains unchanged, with 2,280-2,300 as strong resistance.
$SOL｜96.87: Fell below the 100 mark, with a low of 92.34. Polymarket launched a 5-minute prediction market, and funds have all rushed to play ultra-short-term speculation, severely draining liquidity from altcoin spot markets. Support is expected around the 90 level below.
Summary: With cooling macro data and panic selling from hackers, the current deep V-shaped recovery is just an oversold correction. Don't risk your principal betting that the hacker's gun is out of bullets; wait for a right-side stabilization before taking action.
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 $SNDK SanDisk and Hynix plunged this afternoon, a result of individual negative news and systemic industry risks resonating:
SanDisk itself: "Good news fully priced in" from earnings
Although earnings exceeded expectations and announced a 1-for-8 stock split, consumer business revenue declined 29% quarter-over-quarter, and Q2 guidance showed a slowdown in sequential growth, triggering profit-taking selling pressure.
Hynix and industry commonality: AI narrative shaken
Amazon's massive capital expenditure data raised market concerns about AI investment return cycles; Intel's weak PC processor sales forecast intensified demand anxiety, leading investors to question the financing costs and sustainability of the AI boom.
Summary: SanDisk faces an individual issue of "lack of new catalysts after earnings realization," while Hynix bears more of the transmission pressure from the overall loosening of valuation logic in the AI hardware sector.Today BTC dropped from 81,779 to 76,519, closing at 77,762, down 4.91%. Losing 4 points in one day is nothing, the real issue is that it broke below a key level: the daily Bollinger lower band at 78,581. Let's break down the three timeframes. Weekly: This week opened at 80,637, low at 76,519, now at 77,762, down 3.59%. MA5 is at 81,743, price is below it. But the weekly short-term 20-period cumulative gain/loss is still +36.75%, trend reading remains strongly bullish, mid-term 50-period is -14.36%. The weekly chart says: the big picture is intact, but this candle looks bad. Daily: This is where the bad news lies. MA5 80,213, MA20 81,598, MA50 81,999, bearish alignment. MACD histogram -676, death cross zone. Today's volume is 2.84 times average, a volume-increasing decline. Closing price fell outside the Bollinger lower band, position -13.8%, bandwidth only 7.39%. 4-hour: Not so bad actually. Closed with a long lower shadow, shadow accounts for 47.6%, Bollinger position 1.2%, pulled back near the lower band at 77,702. RSI 14-period at 33.4, not yet extreme. The conflict among the three timeframes is here: weekly is still in an uptrend channel, daily has broken down, 4H caught the fall below. In this structure, the most common mistake is to take the weekly conclusion as a daily trade. Price level Macro and Geopolitical Background: Continued Suppression of Oil Prices at $110
The situation in the Middle East is still heating up: Iran may not actively respond to the US's direct negotiation proposals, the US has warned allies to prepare for potential strikes on Iran after the midterm elections, and CENTEN has reported to Trump options for attacking Iran again. Brent crude oil prices have broken through $110, rising energy costs complicate the monetary policy outlook, further suppressing demand for risk assets.
The historical shadow of midterm elections should not be ignored either: declines of 72% in 2010, 65% in 2014, 52% in 2018, and 27% in 2022 — this pattern, combined with security incidents and weakness in tech stocks, creates an additional risk backdrop at present.
$BTC $ETH $SOL #英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 $AAVE
Today He Yi said that the hacker's 60 million USDT collateralized in Aave can recover 14 million. It sounds like a good stopgap, but the real focus is another point.
The Aave community is pushing to reduce the lending caps on V3 and V4, removing about $3.8 billion of unused limits in one go. The reason is straightforward: narrow the loopholes before phased unlocking, so hackers can't build large positions with locked funds.
AAVE current price is 126, down 5% in 24 hours, daily high and low at 138 and 115 respectively, with significant volatility. The rate is slightly negative near zero, contract holdings are only 1.05 million tokens, about 13 million USD — this selling pressure mainly comes from spot market sentiment, leveraged positions have already exited.
I just wrote about Aave this morning, saying that a drop in sentiment doesn't equal a drop in positions. Now the positions have lightened again, but the stance remains the same. With such a drop, leverage wasn't even involved; even if you guessed right, it wouldn't matter, positions are more honest than me.
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 Binance hot wallet suspected to have been hacked for about $3.5 billion, Tether and Circle urgently froze $2.54 billion, but what truly drains the market is panic itself.
$BTC: $77,645, down 5.01%. Abnormal withdrawals from Binance triggered a stampede, with over $1.1 billion liquidated across the network in 24 hours, longs accounting for $940 million. $76,500 is the average cost line for short-term holders; holding this level is key to stabilization.
$ETH: $2,242, down 5.29%. Hackers converted some assets into ETH, creating continuous selling pressure. ETH ETF net outflows in October expanded to $1.35 billion, making its capital flow the weakest among the three major cryptos.
$SOL: $96.89, down 5.63%. Fell below the $100 integer mark; thin order books plus high leverage amplified the impact, but spot 4-hour net inflow is $9.57 million, indicating some are buying amid panic.
Summary: Hackers are the fuse, but the real truth is the panic index dropping from 51 to 30. Between $76.5K and $2,200 ETH, which do you think will break first? Or is this crash the golden buying opportunity? Leave your judgment in the comments.
#机构资金转弱，BTC与ETH谁先迎来回流？ $SOL
What does the traditional business of bond issuance by securities firms have to do with Solana? South Korea's Mirae Asset explained in one sentence: in a $3 billion tokenization plan, bonds will be issued on the Solana chain.
This is a leading securities firm in South Korea, with a parent group managing hundreds of billions of dollars. Their choice of chain is not for decentralization, but for being cheap, fast, and because retail investors are on the chain. RWA has been talked about for two years, but the real implementation is still about financing.
The market didn't cooperate. I just pulled the numbers: SOL current price 96.96, down 3.5% in 24 hours, lowest touched 92.34. Fees turned negative, contract holdings 3.5 million tokens, about $340 million, not a single one has fled.
The news supports the long term, the market favors the short term, I've seen this kind of split many times. Positive talk but price hammered in hand, in the end, who wins depends on when holders admit defeat.
#US core PCE rose to 3.1% in September, rate hike expectations remain high USDT frozen for 1.5 billion, but not a single BTC moved: The harshest truth of the Binance theft case
In this Binance theft case, Tether quickly froze over $1.567 billion USDT, combined with Circle freezing USDC, nearly $3 billion in stablecoin assets have been locked, with a high probability of recovery through law enforcement processes; however, about 18,000 BTC worth approximately $1.4 billion have remained completely untouched by the hacker since acquisition, which is the harshest truth of this incident. The freeze capability of stablecoins comes from centralized issuers who have contract blacklist authority; once a hacker's address is marked, transfers can be blocked. In contrast, Bitcoin's decentralized network has no "freeze switch"; hackers holding private keys have full control over asset disposition. Exchanges can only mark addresses and prevent these BTC deposits from entering compliant platforms but cannot lock the private keys themselves.
The hacker's choice to stay inactive is not giving up on cashing out but waiting for the best liquidity window to avoid on-chain tracking. These unresolved BTC represent a Damocles sword of selling pressure hanging over the market: stablecoin negative impacts are quickly digested as freezes take effect, but hackers could split, mix coins, and cash out OTC at any time, causing a secondary shock to BTC. Even if Binance promises all losses will be covered by the SAFU security fund and user principal remains unaffected, the secondary market still needs to continuously price in this potential selling pressure. Small-cap narrative coins are more sensitive to BTC sentiment, increasing the risk of repeated volatility going forward
#btcAs settlement approaches, the real market divergence has already manifested in funding costs.
$BTC funding rates remain positive, with $ZEC even higher; however, $ETH and $SOL have turned negative. The costs borne by bulls and bears are completely different, indicating that market sentiment has not formed a unified direction.
Looking at position changes, BTC positions increased by 1.91% intraday, while ETH, SOL, and ZEC all saw varying degrees of decline. Especially SOL, with a 10.91% daily position decrease, showing clearer signs of capital withdrawal.
Price performance is also divergent: BTC, ETH, and SOL fell simultaneously, while only ZEC rose against the trend, but its positions decreased during the rise.
Overall network trading volume has significantly expanded, yet position sizes continue to shrink. This combination looks more like position adjustments before settlement rather than confirmation of a new trend.
My strategy is simple:
No rush to chase direction before settlement, no blind expansion of positions. Wait for funding rates, positions, and prices to resonate again before considering the next step.
Core PCE remains high, and interest rate expectations continue to be an unavoidable pressure for the market.
#BTC #ETH #SOL #ZEC #CryptoMarket
#USCorePCERisesTo3.1% Liquidation of 1.1 billion! The leverage clearing and order book slicing behind Binance's flash crash
"180,000 people liquidated, $1.1 billion evaporated." Binance's suspected hack triggered a flash crash on the afternoon of October 30. This was not a simple hacker dump, but a structural shock caused by leverage clearing and narrative reconstruction. Three order book slices reveal the truth:
$ANTHROPICUSDT: down 6.44% to $169.54. As a Pre-IPO asset leverage experiment, fundamentals are good, but there are many retail long positions and a lack of large holder support, resulting in very poor liquidity. The trend is dominated by AI sentiment, making it a panic hotspot.
$BTCUSDT: down 4.92% to $77,723. The most stable capital structure: "spot receiving, leverage withdrawing." The 79k-80k range is key support, but 30-day contracts have seen an outflow as high as 7.18 billion, with mid-term clearing ongoing; the current situation is only classified as a correction.
$SOLUSDT: down 5.50% to $97.02. Lost the $100 mark. Spot inflow of 32.31 million, but contracts outflow of 105 million. Spot is receiving, leverage is running; the $100 level needs contract confidence to be rebuilt.
Summary: The hacker incident was only a trigger; the core vulnerability lies in leverage accumulation. Before contract funds flow back in, any rebound can only be treated as a "technical repair after deleveraging," not a reversal.
#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 Main coins $ETH $BTC rate flips, positions run away, this rebound feels a bit fake
The capital flow is the most valuable part today. The rate curve climbed from +0.0016% on 10/24 to a peak of +0.0081% on 10/28, with bulls still lost in the dream of new highs and not waking up; the latest rate directly flipped negative to -0.004%, turning into shorts paying and longs receiving, sentiment changed overnight.
Positions are more honest than words: as of this morning, the net outflow of positions during 10/30 trading has surged to -322.4M (intraday data, not full-day), completely giving back the previous three days' inflows of +109.1M, +43.3M, +43.4M and even paying interest, with a 7-day cumulative net outflow of -297.6M. In plain language: this rebound is not driven by new money buying in, but by shorts covering and forced liquidations collapsing the market — positions run away first, price then acts, very fake. Use as much position as you work with; if positions don't burn, talents won't burn.
$BTC $ETH After the confirmed abnormal transfer from Binance hot wallet, the on-chain estimate is about 5.5 to 5.9 billion USD. CZ said user funds are safe, and as a shareholder, he expects to cover the full amount.
Tether froze about 1.567 billion USDT, Circle froze about 823 million USDC, totaling nearly 2.4 billion. Binance claims to have verified freezing about 2.54 billion, and withdrawals are still suspended.
On the same day, core PCE reported 3.1%, and December rate hike expectations rose again. The hacker incident was the trigger, and macro conditions were already tight.
$BTC dropped from 81,970 to 76,519 last night, now hovering around 77,380, with funding rates still low.
This is a panic sell-off pit; I don't see it as the start of a trend reversal. In the short term, watch if the 77,200 to 76,520 range can hold.
Short-term support is at 77,200; several hourly candles this afternoon have been consolidating near 77,300. If it breaks, reduce positions first.
The first resistance above is 78,000; the 5 PM spike reached 78,039 then dropped. If it holds, then look at 79,000.
Stop loss below 76,450; target first at 79,000. Keep position size small as usual. The news is still unfolding, so don't rush to bottom-fish or chase shorts on $BTC #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？ Is the rally tonight a reversal, or just another "wolf is coming"? Bears are closely watching these three things
For now, I still view this evening's rally from a bearish perspective: BTC is currently at 77,762 USDT, down 3.09% in 24 hours; ETH is at 2,246.72 USDT, down 3.45% in 24 hours. The pattern of dumping during the day, rallying at night, and pressing down again at dawn is indeed familiar, but the price is still near the 7-day low, so we can't treat a short rebound as a trend reversal.
Technically, BTC and ETH have RSI values of 23.7 and 20.49 respectively, indicating oversold conditions; this means bears should be cautious of a quick rebound when continuing to push down. However, the MACD is still in a death cross, the super trend indicators all point downward, and BTC's capital flow is net outflow. To me, if tonight's rally is just a low-volume pullback that fails to reclaim the moving average resistance zone, it looks more like emotional repair rather than a new trend.
Will BTC drop to 76,000 or ETH fall below 2,100? This is not a certain path, but if the rebound lacks sustained volume and macro risk appetite weakens, the market may still test lower liquidity again. Conversely, if there is a volume surge reclaiming key moving averages and holding steady, the bearish narrative will need to cool down. The positive news from the previous day once pushed BTC above 81,800 USD, but the current pullback shows that the good news has not fully translated into sustained buying.
The above is only market analysis and does not constitute investment advice.[Pharaoh's Market Watch]
OKX has teamed up with NYSE parent company ICE and Trade.xyz to bring perpetual contracts into the compliant US market. Is this a game changer?
Pharaoh says, not exactly a game changer, but this is what you call "Wall Street's legit forces officially taking over the casino license."
What were perpetual contracts before? They were the cash cow of offshore exchanges, seen by US regulators as "outlaws beyond the law." If you wanted to play, you had to risk breaking rules on shady exchanges, going all-in with 100x leverage. Now it's different: OKX provides liquidity, ICE offers compliance endorsement, Trade.xyz supplies the technology. The three combined are putting perpetual contracts in a suit and tie, confidently walking through the US door.
What does this mean for BTC?
Short term, it's a boost to sentiment. Derivatives compliance means traditional financial giants are no longer pretending—they want to take a bite out of crypto contracts. When the market hears "compliance," risk appetite warms up a bit, and BTC can catch a breather.
But long term, it's a double-edged sword. Compliance means US players will face strict leverage limits and tougher KYC, so fewer gamblers chasing quick riches with 100x leverage. But for institutions, having a regulated contract market means they can finally short and hedge, making BTC's underlying liquidity more solid.
Before, playing perpetuals was like bare-chested fighting desperately; now it's wearing a suit and paying protection fees. $BTC $ETH $SOL #OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 #StrategyQ3净利润创单季新高，数字资产收益贡献显著
Wow, this profit statement is literally Bitcoin's "puppet on strings."
A record quarterly net profit of 19.5 billion? Don't get too excited yet; a closer look reveals it's all paper wealth. The 20.9 billion operating profit is almost entirely due to BTC fair value revaluation—in other words, the coin price went up, so they booked it directly in accounting. In Q2, when the coin dropped, they lost 8.2 billion; in Q3, when the coin rose, they earned 19.5 billion—this isn't a listed company, it's a Bitcoin leveraged ETF disguised in software clothing.
What really makes you sweat is the BTC Yield per share dropping by 3.7%. The company raised 21.2 billion USD this year to aggressively buy coins, increasing holdings, but the number of shares issued grew even faster! The "Bitcoin concentration" for ordinary shareholders is being diluted to death. The only premise for this game to continue is one: BTC must always go up. Once the coin price pulls back, dilution plus volatility will double whammy, and that picture is too ugly to watch.
But to be fair, this quarter's financial maneuvers are steadier than before: 5.9 billion cash on hand, preferred dividends can be covered for 3.4 years, and they even repurchased 2 billion STRC. This shows Saylor is shifting from pure faith toward "surviving the bear market."
Summary: Don't buy MSTR based on PE; it's a BTC leveraged certificate with a preferred debt structure. As long as the coin exists, the myth lives; when the coin adjusts, paper profits can turn into paper losses overnight. Faith is faith, but the cost of leverage is always asymmetric.
Personal opinion, not investment adviceEarnings report exploded, but I insist on taking the opposite side: this time I bet No
First, I push all the chips in my hand onto the table: SNDK, I choose No.
It's not that the data is disappointing, it's actually too good. Revenue increased by 378% year-over-year, with strong guidance. It sounds like a charge, but the AI storage line had already hyped up before the earnings report, so expectations were front-loaded. The moment it lands is often when the realization sell-off starts.
More importantly, storage has cyclical attributes. What everyone is watching is not how strong this quarter is, but how supply will move and how prices will be guided going forward. As long as Q2 guidance isn’t "explosively ridiculous," it’s hard to keep fueling the valuation.
Looking at sentiment: today, both optical communication and storage in the computing hardware chain retreated, and the sector’s beta has weakened. SNDK trying to independently close in the green against the sector? Not easy.
Giving No a 65 score in the market also shows that most funds don’t believe "good earnings = continued rise." What I’m betting on is the drop right after the good news is fully priced in—not bearish on fundamentals, but a trade expectation gap.
$BTC $SNDK $xSNDK
#闪迪Q1营收同比增378%，Q2营收指引强劲 October 30, 2026 Issue 112 Aspirin Cycle Analysis from a Data Scientist's Perspective On Wednesday night, news broke of a Binance hack involving about $6.3 billion in funds, with approximately $3 billion frozen, and all deposits and withdrawals suspended. The entire network saw liquidations exceeding $1.5 billion overnight. Based on past experience, a negative event of this magnitude is enough to trigger a long bearish candlestick. However, Bitcoin's lowest point only dropped to 76,642, just landing on the 21-week moving average at 76,612, almost exactly. This event itself is a piece of data. It indicates that the current sell-off is not yet panic selling; there are buyers at the market bottom. But it does not prove that the bottom has appeared, because a true cycle low is usually accompanied by a concentrated release of volume, which did not happen this time. In this issue, I put together all the clues from the past two weeks: cycle timing, on-chain cost, moving average structure, macro rhythm, and finally present what I believe is the most probable path along with the corresponding strategy. 01 Where we stand in the cycle The high point of this round was 126,000 on October 6, 2025, and a low of 57,700 appeared in July this year. Starting from the bear market bottom in November 2022, today is day 1,439. The previous two cycles saw lows on days 1,432 and 1,436 respectively, so from a timing perspective, the low window has opened. Another timing pattern comes from the midterm election year. Historically, the fourth-quarter lows in midterm election years generally occur after the election. This year's election is on November 3, which means the window is very likely to fall in mid-November Liquidity Concerns and New Narrative Battles
As cracks in centralized trust emerge, capital is voting with its feet. Rumors of about 3.5 billion funds moving on Binance are fermenting, triggering 628 million in liquidations within an hour. BTC lost the 78,000 mark, while the top ANTHROPICUSDT — a new species bringing AI Pre-IPO onto contracts — is pricing unlisted equity with leverage. The market is trading anxiety and greed simultaneously.
$BTC (77,766 USD, -0.26%): Liquidity contraction is the real enemy. Derivatives open interest is rapidly evaporating, with altcoin sectors dropping over 10%. The event spreads to DeFi, Aave restricts lending, and on-chain liquidity tightens systemically. Prices haven't crashed, but the disappearance of "depth" is more worrisome.
$SOL (97.11 USD, +1.61%): Closed higher against the trend but the ETF narrative is souring. Spot ETFs saw a net outflow of 19.16 million in one day, with incremental funds turning into marginal selling pressure. The 100 USD level repeatedly changes hands; the rebound is short-covering, not new long entries, indicating an unhealthy structure.
$ANTHROPICUSDT (170.02 USD, -5.87%): First test of Pre-IPO contracts. Retail longs outnumber shorts sixfold, lacking large buyer support. Crowded high-leverage longs are the biggest risk source amid liquidity contraction.
Summary: The core issue is whether trading can proceed smoothly. Order books are thinning and capital is diverting. With open interest declining and lending tightening, capital preservation is priority; wait for liquidity to recover before attacking.
#英特尔Q4业绩指引低于预期，股价大跌 77,000 这个数字一出来，我手机屏幕都安静了两秒。 你上一次看到 BTC 日线 RSI 趴在 30 附近，是什么时候？ BTC 已经滑到 77,000 下方，日线 RSI 30.7，贴着超卖边缘，价格被 SMA5 的 79,476、SMA10 的 80,512、SMA20 的 81,401 三层均线齐齐压在头顶，排列还是标准空头。ETH 更狠，2,200 一线，RSI 只有 24，超卖得很深，均线同样全线在上方。表面看是普跌，但我盯着的不是跌幅，是钱往哪儿躲。 这轮最值得琢磨的其实是 ZEC。它跌到 1,200 下方，RSI 44.6，在满屏 20 多的读数里显得格外扎眼。价格只比 SMA5 的 1,254 和 SMA10 的 1,241 低一点点，1,200 正好卡在 SMA20 的 1,213 附近当支撑，近七天还逆势涨了 0.92%。这不是普涨里的搭便车，是弱势里被单独挑出来的标的。资金偏好在这里露出了马脚：主流承压时，一部分钱没有离场，而是缩到叙事更独立、筹码更轻的角落。 偏多的读法是这样：BTC 和 ETH 的 RSI 都进了敏感区，超卖本身就是一种缓冲，只要不再出新的外$MSFT, can Azure's growth cover the return pressure brought by AI investments? Microsoft's revenue for Q1 of fiscal year 2027 increased by 19% year-over-year, with Azure up 48%, showing strong demand for cloud and AI. The real key lies in capacity, gross margin, and capital recovery speed: when computing power supply is tight, order growth does not necessarily immediately translate into profit. If cloud revenue and operating profit continue to outpace capital expenditures, AI investment returns become clearer; if depreciation rises while utilization and gross margin decline, the growth premium should be reassessed.Hyperliquid is climbing the market cap rankings, and $HYPE has now overtaken $ZEC.
$HYPE is sitting around $22B in market cap, slightly ahead of Zcash at $21.4B.
The growth behind HYPE is largely tied to its expanding dominance in decentralized perpetual trading.
Trading volume, platform activity, and demand for onchain derivatives have continued to strengthen its position.
ZEC has also enjoyed a strong run this cycle, so overtaking it is a notable milestone for Hyperliquid.18,000 BTC in the hacker's hands remain untouched: Can Binance recover it?
On-chain data shows that approximately 18,000 BTC stolen this time are dispersed across 19 hacker wallet addresses, and no transfers have occurred so far. This has raised questions in the market: Is there still a chance for Binance to recover this Bitcoin worth about 1.4 billion USD? First, we must recognize the underlying limitations: BTC has no centralized issuer and there is no switch to freeze on-chain assets with one click. As long as the hacker holds the private keys, they can split, mix coins, and cash out across channels at any time, which is completely different from the already frozen 3 billion stablecoins. The hacker’s choice to remain inactive for now is most likely waiting for the right window to sell, avoiding on-chain tracking, and does not mean the assets are easier to recover. Currently, Binance is working with on-chain intelligence agencies and global exchanges to blacklist these addresses: any compliant exchange that receives these involved BTC deposits will directly intercept them, blocking the hacker’s channel to cash out through CEXs. However, DEXs, OTC, and mixing tools still provide cash-out routes. Historically, there have been occasional cases of stolen BTC being recovered, mostly relying on law enforcement catching the hacker personally and controlling the private keys. The probability of successfully recovering large amounts of BTC purely through on-chain interception is very low. The industry generally predicts that full recovery this time will be extremely difficult. For the market, the hacker’s holding stillness only temporarily eliminates immediate panic selling, but as long as this BTC remains under the hacker’s control, the long-term selling pressure shadow cannot be completely lifted. Small-cap coins will still be prone to violent fluctuations following BTC sentiment. In summary: Exchanges can block cash-out channels through regulated exchanges The real danger in the market is not just the price drop, but that the capital structures of the three major coins are all flashing red simultaneously.
$BTC options settlement pressure is high, with $10.8 billion expiring, increasing short-term volatility risk. The bullish chips between $90,000 and $100,000 have temporarily lost their advantage, and capital is clearly more inclined to guard against a decline.
$ETH whales reduced holdings by about 160,000 coins in a week, and exchange balances continue to rise. The long-short ratio remains around 3.02, retail investors are eager to buy, but the downtrend has not truly reversed yet.
$SOL long positions are overly concentrated, with a long-short ratio reaching 3.47. ETF funds continue to flow out, and the $99 level needs close attention. If support breaks, crowded longs could trigger a chain liquidation.
Next, focus on three levels: BTC: $77,000 ETH: $2,238 SOL: $99
Additionally, with the US core PCE rising to 3.1%, expectations for rate cuts are under pressure, so the market probably isn't safe in the short term yet.
Remember: a price rebound does not mean the risk is gone; first, watch if capital truly flows back.
#BTC #ETH #SOL #CryptoMarket #Crypto
#USCorePCERisesTo3.1% $SNDK Direction: Short
· Entry: Short when the rebound is resisted around 1230 - 1250.
· Stop Loss: Firmly stop loss if it breaks through 1280.
· Take Profit: First target 1206 (near previous low), second target 1180.
⚠️ Note: There is an extremely severe one-sided plunge (drop over 11%), MACD dead cross below zero axis with very strong bearish momentum. Do not chase shorts directly; wait for a rebound to confirm resistance, use light positions with stop loss.SanDisk $SNDK is really having a tough time this round😭
As of 18:55 tonight, the SNDK contract has dropped more than 11% in 24 hours, hitting a low near 1215
What's strange is that the earnings report released last night was actually quite impressive:
Quarterly revenue of $11 billion, a 23% quarter-over-quarter increase, data center business up 61%, gross margin as high as 85.1%, and even the next quarter's guidance exceeded market expectations
Yet the market still isn't buying it...
The problem might lie in the expectations😯
Last quarter revenue grew 51% quarter-over-quarter, this quarter it dropped to 23%, and the consumer business shrank by 29%
When the market has already priced in a super cycle for AI storage, simply beating expectations doesn't seem to be enough
Adding to that, the tech sell-off triggered by Intel and Amazon earnings is putting pressure on the entire AI industry chain
Personally, I'm not in a hurry to bottom-fish; tonight's performance after the US market opens will be very critical:
The fundamentals remain strong, but the market is starting to reassess how long this storage cycle can really last
The better the earnings, the harder the stock falls — that's the most intriguing part to ponder
#闪迪Q1营收同比增378%，Q2营收指引强劲 Core PCE year-on-year rose to 3.1% in September, significantly higher than the previous value — the market had originally bet on inflation steadily falling and the rate cut window approaching, but this data directly tore up that script. 🙄 The more critical signal is hidden in expectations: the focus of discussion has shifted from "when to cut rates" to "whether there will be a rate hike again in December." This is not ordinary inflation noise but a directional reversal in the macro narrative. First, look at $BTC's reaction. After the data release, the price once surged near 81,500 but failed to hold, then fell back to around 80,800, fluctuating around 80,000 throughout the day. Notably, the volatility range clearly narrowed — despite the same negative news, the market did not experience the previous intense sell-off. This indicates that incremental negative news is being digested rather than amplified by panic. 💡 However, "resisting decline" does not equal "turning strong"; the failure to break higher itself indicates substantial selling pressure above, and the bulls' trigger condition should be an effective hold above 81,500, not a single-day spike. The real divergence appears in $ETH. Ethereum is currently trading between 2,320 and 2,350, with a decline significantly greater than Bitcoin, and capital flow clearly favors $BTC. This is a typical asset ranking under tightening expectations: when liquidity tightens, capital prioritizes returning to the largest market cap assets with the highest certainty, while high-beta assets are the first to be reduced. The weakening of the $ETH/$BTC ratio explains the current market risk appetite state better than any single price point. My judgment is: the market is underestimating the persistence of this narrative shift. Most people still consider 3 Canadian AI company Cohere is valued at $20.5 billion, with total financing up to $5 billion, and the first round already closed. The list includes Nvidia and the Canadian government—the government alone has pledged up to $1.14 billion and plans to spend about another $1.2 billion to build local computing power.
Translation: A country is starting to treat AI computing power like its power grid and highways.
There are three implications for the crypto space. First, wherever Nvidia’s money flows, GPUs and electricity become tight, and computing power rental prices get firm. Second, the entry of national-level capital indicates this is not a sprint but a decade-long race. Third, the more expensive the computing power, the more cost-effective decentralized computing power becomes.
The AI concept coins have been a hot story over the past year, but what traditional capital has truly validated with real money are these private companies building models and clusters. Many on-chain projects are still selling narratives rather than actual computing power; this gap is what will be most frequently traded going forward.
In the short term, don’t expect this round of financing to directly pump any coin, as it has no cash flow relationship with coin prices. In the medium term, as long as traditional capital continues to bet at this scale, the valuation anchor for the AI sector will be lifted, and sentiment around decentralized computing power tokens like $TAO will be repeatedly ignited.
What you really need to watch is not this news but Nvidia’s production capacity and electricity prices next quarter. When computing power is tight, AI coins have a chance; when computing power loosens, the narrative falls apart. Position control in this round is more important than directional judgment.$TRX 0.341，24h +2.90%
今天 6 点冲上 0.36715 就一路回落，位置 33%
上午 9 点起连着五根阴线，从 0.358 一路压到 0.339
RSI 1H 50.87，MACD 1H 已经死叉掉到中轨下面 1.71%
仓 0.27 亿，24 小时加了 94.60%，最近 3 小时还在加 7.99%
费率 -0.38%，空头还在付钱；大户多空比 1.50
涨的退了，加的仓没退 $PEPE 0.0000050457，24h +4.48%
早上 7 点到 14 点连着八根阳线，14 点收在 0.0000049818
15 点一根空头吞没打断，17 点又阴回去
今日 -8.16%，24h 振幅 32.91%，位置 55%；量比 14.97
仓 0.45 亿，24 小时撤了 10.16%，三个里唯一在减
大户多空比 0.71，空头占 59%；散户账户比 2.28
换手最凶的那个，仓却在往外走 $AAVE 124.58，24h -6.33%
早上 8 点砸到 114.93 是全天最低
9 点到 14 点连着六根阳线，15 点一根空头吞没打断
之后四根阴线又跌回 1Before settlement, first look at the cost split
As the settlement day approaches, what the market shows first is not direction, but a cost gap. BTC rate still reports 0.0064%, ZEC as high as 0.0097%; ETH has turned negative to -0.0016%, SOL at -0.0049%. Paying fees on one side and receiving money on the other, costs are not unified, so price fluctuations are put aside for now.
Positions are also retreating. In the past hour, BTC, ETH, SOL, and ZEC shrank by 0.39%, 0.45%, 0.62%, and 0.53% respectively; on a daily basis, BTC increased by 1.91%, ETH decreased by 2.95%, ZEC decreased by 1.69%, SOL decreased by 10.91%. Prices are also awkward: BTC dropped 1.90% near 78560, ETH dropped 2.97% near 2247, SOL dropped 2.05% near 98.13, ZEC rose 2.16% near 1272. ZEC, which rose, is reducing positions, while among the falling ones only BTC is adding.
The total network transaction volume surged to 339.67 billion, up 69.59%, but open interest fell to 138.882 billion, down 0.57%. Volume came in, but positions were not held, which looks more like turnover before settlement rather than a bottom volume surge.
Options settlement is in the afternoon, and the employment cost index is expected to be released in the evening. My action remains unchanged: no position increase before settlement, wait for costs to unify again. Direction can be recognized later, but cost must be recognized first.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
#美国9月核心PCE升至3.1%，加息预期仍高 Calculate it, the absolute value of TRX's hourly funding rate is nearly four times that of kPEPE. What I care more about in this message is the difference in position costs, not who rises or falls. Hyperliquid perpetual public market shows that TRX's current rate has turned negative, making it the contract with the highest absolute funding rate in the material.
① TRX rate is -0.0287%/hour, up 1.13% in 24 hours. According to the rule that shorts pay longs when the rate is negative, shorts currently have to bear the payment and face price increases, but this does not directly imply that the price will continue to rise.
② kPEPE rate is 0.0073%/hour, down 1.77% in 24 hours. Longs pay fees but face price declines, indicating that the direction of payment and price movement are not the same. I think it's too simplistic to treat the sign of the funding rate as a button for price rise or fall.
③ The annualized rates corresponding to the two are about -252% and 64%. Annualization just extends the current reading for display; it does not mean this rate can be sustained, nor is it a guaranteed return.
My judgment is that this information is more significant for position cost management than for signaling market direction. If TRX's negative rate continues, then the cost pressure on shorts will keep accumulating. This is a conditional inference, not a result that has already occurred. To add: when you usually evaluate funding rates, do you focus more on single magnitude, duration, or the proportion of cumulative fees to position size? When macro signals conflict, I choose to reduce my position rather than wait and see.
The reason is simple: waiting and seeing looks like you’re not losing, but in fact, you’re handing over the decision-making power to the market. Conflicting signals mean neither bulls nor bears have the upper hand. At such times, the heavier your position, the easier it is to get wiped out by a sudden spike. Reducing position is not bearish; it’s about pulling yourself out of a passive state first and then re-entering when signals align.
I’ve encountered this before with BTC and ETH. On one hand, inflation was high and rate hike expectations were rising; on the other, employment data weakened, causing macro signals to contradict each other. I reduced my total position to 30%. When BTC rebounded to resistance, I cut half, and when ETH broke key support, I cleared the short-term position immediately. Later, core PCE exceeded expectations, crypto fell back, BTC tested previous lows, and ETH dropped even harder. Because I reduced my position early, I controlled the drawdown and wasn’t forced to sell at lows. I still had ammo to buy back when the market stabilized. $BTC $ETH
So generally, when signals conflict, I reduce my position first to protect capital and mindset, and only talk offense when the direction is clear.
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 Bitcoin breaks below $80,000! Is $77,000 just a shakeout? This time, don’t mistake the rebound for a reversal!
BTC fell below $80,000, fluctuating repeatedly around $77,000. Some are rushing to buy the dip, while others are preparing to liquidate. The crypto world feels like a daily drama; the difference is others pay membership fees to watch dramas, but we might be risking principal chasing the market.
This decline can’t be simply attributed to leverage liquidation. The market is also affected by declining macro risk appetite and security incidents on trading platforms. Over $1.5 billion in crypto positions were liquidated, indicating concentrated leverage risk release, but the end of liquidations doesn’t mean the downtrend is over.
Technically, the $80,000 level has shifted from psychological support to a key resistance to watch. If it can’t be reclaimed soon, the rebound may just be a breather in the downtrend. Key support levels to watch below are $76,000, $75,000, and $73,000.
I prefer to wait for BTC to firmly reclaim $80,000 before seeing if it can challenge $82,000 to $84,000. Until confirmed, it’s better to earn less than to catch a falling knife.
True experts don’t rush in on every dip; they know when to act and when to relax.
Opportunities are never lacking; what’s scarce is the capital to survive until the next bull market! #WeeklyShowcase #BTCFallsTo77000 $BTC