Orbit Post Sitemap
🚨 Apple's earnings report seems like a big win, but the market isn't buying it! The real risk might be hidden in next quarter's gross margin.
$AAPL Apple's Q4 revenue and profit both exceeded market expectations, but the stock price dropped after the earnings release.
The question is: with such good results, why are investors selling?
The answer may be just one: the market is not looking at how much was earned in the past, but how much can be earned in the future.
What is most worth watching this time is Apple's guidance for next quarter's gross margin.
📉 1. Gross margin decline is what the market is truly worried about
Apple expects the December quarter gross margin to be 45%–46%, a clear drop from this quarter's 47.9%, and below analysts' previous expectations.
This means that even if revenue continues to grow, profit margins may be squeezed.
📉 2. Rising memory prices are transmitting cost pressure
The CFO clearly stated that memory prices are currently at unprecedented highs.
Previously accumulated low-cost inventory is gradually being used up, and cost pressures may continue in the coming quarters.
On top of that, investments related to Siri AI are starting to be accounted for, so Apple faces not only sales growth challenges but also how to maintain profit margins.
📉 3. Service business growth is slowing, another profit engine is cooling down
The service business growth guidance for next quarter is slowing to 8%–9%.
Although the service business still has relatively high profit margins, the slowdown in growth also means that Apple's hopes to further improve through the service business are diminishing 🔥The most alarming signal has appeared: both BTC and ETH are holding near critical levels, but institutional funds have not shown active inflows! BTC is hovering around 78,000, ETH is tugging around 2,300, prices have not crashed drastically, yet there is also a lack of strong upward momentum. 📉 Previously, BTC spot ETFs saw a single-day net outflow of about $643 million, and ETH ETFs have experienced outflows for several consecutive trading days, with a single-day net outflow of about $139.7 million on November 2, mostly contributed by BlackRock's ETHA.
🧠 This indicates the market is currently more in a risk digestion phase rather than having re-entered a strong buying stage. BTC's rebound may partly be due to short covering, but whether sustained incremental funds appear depends on subsequent spot trading and ETF flows. The 78,556–78,836 range is a short-term resistance zone to watch for BTC, while ETH needs to be monitored for an effective breakthrough of 2,350–2,370. ⚠️
Additionally, BTC's near-term options implied volatility has risen from about 43.5% to about 51%, meaning the market's expectation of short-term volatility has clearly increased. Policy uncertainty after the U.S. elections and employment data may continue to affect risk appetite. 🧭 Before funds truly flow back, I prefer to control positions and wait for confirmation rather than guessing which bullish candle signals a reversal. When do you think institutional funds will re-enter? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥Don't just focus on the results of the U.S. midterm elections; what’s truly worth studying is the timing overlap between them and BTC's four-year halving cycle! In 2014, 2018, and 2022, the three midterm elections all occurred during bear markets, and BTC continued to decline after the elections before gradually starting a new recovery phase. 📊 The lows were approximately 71 days, 39 days, and 13 days from election day, respectively, which on the surface suggests the cycle bottoms seem to appear earlier each time.
But this does not mean the elections are the switch for market downturns. The years 2014, 2018, and 2022 were accompanied by different industry shocks, especially the 2022 FTX collapse, which had an independent and significant impact on the market. 🧠 Therefore, the halving cycle and political cycle can be studied together but should not be conflated, nor should the three historical events be treated as an inevitable script.
⚠️ What’s most special about 2026 is that BTC’s phase low already appeared early in July, several months ahead of the November election. This could mean the market has completed part of its adjustment early, or it could indicate that the structure of this cycle has changed. Tonight, rather than guessing whether the market will drop again after the election, it’s better to focus on key lows, capital flows, and trend confirmation. Do you trust the four-year cycle more, or do you believe institutional funds will rewrite history this time? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Both chambers flipped blue overnight, and the crypto sector's policy tailwind is about to be discounted
The results of the U.S. midterm elections are out: Voting took place on November 3 local time, with all 435 House seats and 35 Senate seats up for election. The Associated Press confirmed the Democrats secured at least 218 seats in the House and also flipped the Senate blue, resulting in both chambers changing majority control. Trump's second half of the term officially becomes a divided government, with the new Congress taking office in January next year.
For the crypto sector, the significance lies not in who won, but that the tailwind is gone. Over the past two years, crypto benefited from the White House and Congress being controlled by the same party: deregulation, legislative progress, all green lights. Going forward, with legislative and oversight power switching sides, the pace of digital asset-related bills and personnel appointments will face more hurdles, and uncertainty will clearly increase.
But I’m not strictly bearish. Divided government is best at gridlock; with fiscal policy stalled, liquidity expectations might actually loosen. On election night, $BTC first dropped below 76,000 then bounced back above 78,000, reflecting the market betting on both sides.
My stance: The news only changes my mid-term assumptions, not my short-term tactics. Don’t overfill your positions; keep doing what the charts indicate, and don’t chase gains or panic sell based on a single news item.
All of the above is my personal market sense and plan, not investment advice.
What do you think—does the chambers flipping blue mean the crypto sector’s downside is fully priced in, or is the tailwind just over? 👇#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 The Senate flipped blue, and CLARITY's plans need to be redone
The most crucial piece of the U.S. midterm elections puzzle has been settled: The Associated Press called Iowa, where Democrat Josh Turek defeated Republican Ashley Hinson to claim the 51st Senate seat, officially securing Democratic control of the Senate. Other flips that night included Texas, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina, Kansas, and Maine—Texas's Talarico became the first Democratic senator from Texas since 1988, and Ohio's Brown also won.
For the crypto community, the most painful part was the Ohio race: the industry spent about $176 million across more than 100 districts this cycle, with over $50 million spent in Ohio alone opposing Brown, yet Brown still won. The money couldn't buy the seat back.
Don't be too optimistic about legislation yet: On September 15, the CLARITY Act failed a procedural Senate vote 49 to 50, short of the 60-vote threshold; even with a change in majority, it won't automatically become easier. The more likely scenario is that figures like Warren and Brown, who have been tough on crypto, will first lead oversight agendas, with hearings and subpoenas coming before legislation.
With the Senate changing hands, the crypto community's question shifts from "Will the bill pass?" to "Which hearing hurdle will come first?" ZEC's trading volume in the last hour surged nearly 3.7 times, yet the closing price dropped by $2.45.
On OKX, the spot price closed at $1286.67 between 17:00 and 18:00, down from $1289.12 in the previous hour; trading volume rose from $1.8134 million to $6.7175 million. At 18:00, the nominal contract open interest was about $190.33 million, an increase of approximately $4.433 million compared to 17:00. At 18:19, the current price was around $1304.90.
My judgment is that the increase in both trading volume and open interest is significant, but the closing price for that hour did not keep up. Whether the current upward momentum holds until the hour mark will better indicate if the buying pressure can sustain. The total open interest does not distinguish between new longs or shorts.
I am more focused on whether the price between 18:00 and 19:00 can close above the previous hour's high of $1292.32. If it falls back below $1286.67 while open interest continues to rise, the recent upward move will need to be reassessed.
$ZEC Let's calculate: comparing $500 million to over $1 billion, the former is less than half of the latter, but investment is not the same as revenue. When I saw this news, my first reaction was to break down the scope and not equate a large amount directly with a big problem.
① According to reports, Robert Garcia, who will serve as chairman of the House Oversight Committee, stated that Trump's crypto-related business has generated over $1 billion in revenue and said he will examine the family's crypto transactions and other business dealings. This figure indicates the significance of the subject under review, but it is currently his statement and cannot replace the conclusion of an investigation.
② The Democrats previously focused on a member of the UAE royal family who invested about $500 million in World Liberty Financial last year. My focus is that this company is still applying for a nationwide bank license that requires approval from relevant U.S. Treasury departments. The clarity of the funding relationships and the approval process is more critical than the amount itself.
③ The Democrats plan to start inquiries and subpoenas related to the companies and donors from February next year. This is the timeline for subsequent procedures, not proof of any problems found; if the inquiries affect license approval, then the uncertainty of business progress may increase, which is my speculation.
My judgment: this is somewhat negative for Trump's family-related crypto business but not enough to be bearish for the entire industry. I would pay more attention to investigation evidence and license progress rather than headline volume. Which indicator do you usually value most: funding sources, investigation evidence, or license approval progress? "The boot has landed, but that doesn't mean buying has returned"
With the midterm elections concluded, the crypto market first played out "buy the rumor, sell the fact." The Democrats' sweep of both chambers briefly ignited fears of tighter regulation, causing BTC to drop below $76,000 and ETH to dip near $2,225 (´･ω･`). Then, as the results became clear and uncertainty faded, short sellers covered, pushing BTC back up to around $78,468 and ETH recovering above $2,300 to $2,326, a seemingly lively V-shaped rebound (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧.
However, this feels more like an emotional swing rather than a confirmed trend. The Democratic victory had already been priced in by Polymarket at over 75%, with over $660 million in BTC options traded on election day, about $420 million of which were calls, indicating bets on "bad news being fully priced in" (・∀・). The issue is that spot ETFs have seen net outflows for more than twenty consecutive trading days, with BlackRock's ETHA seeing a single-day outflow of $138 million; BTC's rebound mainly relied on short covering, with no significant new buying entering the market.
Therefore, $78,000 and $2,300 seem more like psychological stop-loss levels for both bulls and bears. Holding these levels does not equal buying returning (￣▽￣). If capital flows do not turn positive going forward, the rebound may still be just a short-term correction.
$BTC $ETH
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权
The voting results are in, marking a critical watershed for the AI theme in the US stock market.
The market’s core question is simple: Can Trump’s all-in AI strategy continue moving forward?
Previously, Trump’s AI strategy centered on loosening regulations, accelerating data center network approvals, and advancing the $500 billion Starlink AI infrastructure, easing restrictions on computing power, chip, and cloud providers. This was the key policy backing for the current AI capital expenditure cycle. But now, with the change in Congress’s composition, the biggest variable has emerged: executive orders can be pushed, but budget, bill approvals, and energy and land review powers lie with Congress.
The conclusion is clear: The broad AI direction won’t be overturned, but the pace of progress will be significantly slowed.
A completely unrestricted acceleration model is hard to replicate, and the difficulty of implementing strong fiscal stimulus has increased; however, the underlying logic of Silicon Valley giants, computing power demand, and the global AI race remains intact. Regulation will shift from "full liberalization" to "conditional approval."
Impact on US tech stocks:
In the short term, expectations will be cut; high-valuation AI computing power and semiconductors are prone to volatile battles, and capital will first realize the premium from policy dividends;
In the medium term, there will be differentiation. Targets with orders already in place, such as computing hardware, energy support, and data centers, will be more resilient; AI application targets relying purely on policy expectations to tell their story will continue to face valuation pressure.
In the long term, the AI capital expenditure cycle is not over; it is just shifting from "policy-driven" to "performance-driven," with increased volatility.SNDK at $1145, do you dare to catch it?
Revenue surged 378%, but the stock price crashed 13% in one day, halving from 2300 to 1145 — is the explosive performance of SNDK a golden opportunity or a flying knife? Just now, 1050 held.
First, look at the surface: explosive earnings report, but the stock crashed.
Q1 FY2027 revenue $11.031 billion, up 378% year-over-year, up 23% quarter-over-quarter; EPS $49.51, significantly beating expectations; gross margin 85.1%; data center revenue $4.8 billion, up 61% quarter-over-quarter; $5 billion buyback; long-term agreements with minimum committed revenue of about $93.9 billion. All positives, right?
But after the earnings report, the stock dropped over 13% in one day, falling from the June high of 2300 down to 1145, a 35% drop in a month and 13% in a week. The market isn’t ignoring the results; it has already priced in the earnings. Think it’s an overreaction? Hold on, read on.
First point: Why did the stock crash despite explosive earnings? The market fears not the earnings but the "growth slowdown."
Year-over-year revenue growth of 378% sounds scary, but quarter-over-quarter growth is retreating from a higher level; consumer segment (PC/mobile) revenue is under pressure, high prices suppress demand; peers like Kioxia warn limited room for consumer price increases. The market is buying not the present but the next quarter.
What’s more painful: stocks rise on expectations, not facts. Before earnings, it rose from 36 to 2300, over 60 times, the good news was already digested. When earnings came out, institutions’ first reaction wasn’t "Wow, amazing," but "Is there anything better?" — no, so they sell first.
This is traditional finance play: all good news priced in becomes bad news. If you trade it with a meme mindset, you’ll get hurt badly.
Second point: The $93.9 billion minimum committed revenue is not just a promise.
Long-term agreements (NBM) signed with multiple customers cover about half of FY2027 and two-thirds of FY2028 bit production, with minimum committed revenue around $93.9 billion. In plain terms: more than half of the next two years’ revenue is already booked.
Moreover, the company is debt-free, cash-rich, with adjusted free cash flow about $5.7 billion, profit margin over 50%, and this quarter repurchased about $5 billion. This is not a company short on money; it’s a money-printing machine.
AI data center storage demand (HBM + enterprise SSD) is expected to continue through 2027-2028, with supply tight and hard to ease quickly. SNDK is a pure NAND/SSD player, data center accounts for over 40%, deeply cooperating with the three major US hyperscalers, holding strong pricing power. The AI storage shovel seller’s business is intact; what’s bad is the stock chips.
Third point: Technicals show oversold rebound but no mid-term reversal.
Fell from 2300 to 1145, a roughly 50% retracement. Daily RSI rebounded from oversold but remains weak; MACD death cross with shrinking histogram shows signs of bottoming but no golden cross; moving averages in bearish alignment, price below MA20/50. Short term is repair, mid-term is a downtrend channel.
Support: 1050-1100 (recent lows + psychological level) → 1000 (structural break)
Resistance: 1180-1200 (first line) → 1250-1300 (dense trading zone) → 1500+
Only a volume-backed hold above 1200 counts as a reversal; failure means just an oversold bounce.
Also note: 8-for-1 stock split, record date around November 9, trading starts around November 20. Volatility will amplify before and after the split, liquidity may be speculated, but leverage will be swept back and forth.
Bull vs. Bear, you decide
On one side:
Revenue up 378% YoY, gross margin 85%, data center +61%
$93.9 billion minimum committed revenue, more than half of two years’ revenue booked
Debt-free + $5 billion buyback + $5.7 billion free cash flow
Halved from 2300 to 1145, RSI oversold recovery
AI storage supercycle not over
On the other side:
Quarter-over-quarter growth slowing, consumer segment weak
Valuation still requires high growth to justify, PE 8-9x not cheap
Bearish moving averages, mid-term downtrend channel
Post-earnings volume sell-off, selling pressure remains
Volatility amplified around stock split, leverage easily swept
Trading strategy
Aggressive short-term (1-3 days):
Light long positions at 1120-1145, stop loss below 1080 (exit if below recent low). First target 1180-1200, sell half; if breaks 1200, look to 1250. Position size 5-10% of capital, leverage ≤5-10x.
Conservative mid-term (1-4 weeks):
Wait for pullback to strong support at 1050-1100 to build positions gradually, or wait for daily volume-backed hold above 1200 to chase. Stop loss below 1000, target 1300-1500. Position size 10-20%, build in batches. Reduce leverage before and after split, reduce positions before macro events (nonfarm payroll, FOMC, semiconductor peer earnings).
Bearish view:
If rebound at 1180-1200 meets resistance with volume and bearish candle, light short positions, stop loss above 1220, target 1100-1050.
SNDK now is like Nvidia in 2023 —
99% think "It’s risen too much, wait for a pullback," but when pullback comes, they don’t buy, then it rallies back and they regret.
$BTC $ETH $SNDK “The boot dropping” does not equal funds returning
After the results of the U.S. midterm elections were announced, the crypto market first went through a stress test, then quickly saw short covering. The Democrats took control of both the House and Senate, and concerns about tighter regulation once crushed risk appetite: Bitcoin fell below $76,000, Ethereum dipped to $2,225. But once the results were no longer uncertain, the market trading logic immediately shifted from "fear of bad news" to "bad news fully priced in," with Bitcoin making a V-shaped recovery to $78,468, approaching the $79,000 mark; Ethereum reclaimed $2,300, closing at $2,326.
The fuel for this rebound was not the election itself. The Democratic victory had long been priced in by Polymarket at over 75%, what was truly bought back was certainty. On election day, Bitcoin options block trades exceeded $660 million, with about $420 million in call buys, some funds clearly betting on a short-term rebound after the results were finalized.
But price reclaiming key levels does not mean incremental funds have returned. Ethereum spot ETFs have seen net outflows for more than twenty consecutive trading days, with BlackRock's ETHA seeing a single-day outflow of $138 million; Bitcoin's rebound also came more from short covering rather than sustained new buying. The $78,000 and $2,300 levels currently look more like psychological stop-loss lines for bulls and bears rather than trend confirmation signals. The market has temporarily stopped falling, but after "buying the expectation, selling the fact," the real answer from funds is still awaited.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $ETH has been stronger than BTC this afternoon. The lowest point on the hourly candle at 11 AM Beijing time dropped to 2,226, then started to hold above 2,300 in the afternoon, just now reaching a high of 2,330, currently around 2,325, up 4.4% from the low, and +2.4% in 24h.
Binance ETH contract open interest rose from 5.34 billion to 5.50 billion USD in 24 hours, while BTC only increased from 7.73 billion to 7.74 billion. The new leverage is basically all on ETH.
Swolecharts reports that from 0:00 to 10:00 UTC today, ETH liquidations totaled 47.4 million USD, with longs at 27.2 million and shorts at 20.15 million. Shorts have also started to be squeezed in these hours.
$BTC also broke through the large holder's liquidation price of 78,192 at noon, reaching a high of 78,586, now at 78,480, with both sides' fees at +0.01%.
My view is that ETH is currently pushing upward by increasing positions. Undertow statistics show that on Hyperliquid, there are 49.2 million USD worth of short liquidations pressing above the price, while long liquidations below are only 14.4 million. Short-term shorts are more uncomfortable, but since yesterday ETH ETF still had a net outflow of 85.35 million USD and spot hasn't caught up, I don't consider this a reversal yet.🔥What BTC truly lacks is not an election result, but the certainty that can reassure institutions to enter the market! Today, the price hovers around $77,000, the Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 33, and long liquidations totaled $211 million in the past 24 hours. 📊 These data indicate that market sentiment remains fragile; even a slight pause in the rebound could force leveraged longs to exit.
Looking at the CLARITY Act, the Senate procedural vote on September 15 failed to reach the 60-vote threshold, resulting in 49 votes in favor and 50 against. The controversies focus on ethical constraints, stablecoin yield arrangements, and banking competition issues. A change in leadership and agenda priorities in the committee due to turnover does not mean the existing disputes will disappear. 🧩 If negotiations fail to reach a compromise, the legislative certainty the market expects may be further delayed; however, regulators may still advance some matters through rulemaking.
Therefore, do not treat the election directly as a buy signal for BTC. Whether ETF funds have stopped falling and whether macro interest rate expectations ease are the key points to watch next. ⚠️ In the short term, BTC first looks at $76,000; if it breaks down effectively, the focus below is $74,000–$74,900; only by reclaiming $78,000 can the weak structure improve. Do you think the next rally requires a policy breakthrough, or is a capital inflow enough? 🔥No matter how lively the election results are, they can't catch the sell-off for BTC! Today, BTC is still hovering near $77,000, with a slight 24-hour increase of 0.28%, but the Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 33, indicating market sentiment has entered the fear zone. What’s more concerning is that in the past 24 hours, the total liquidations across the network reached $282 million, with long positions accounting for $211 million. 📉 The price not plunging sharply does not mean the leverage risk has disappeared.
Many people pin their hopes on which party controls Congress in the U.S., but the deadlock over the CLARITY Act shows that legislation can’t be completed with a simple majority change. On September 15, the Senate procedural vote failed 49 to 50 to advance the bill; ethical rules, stablecoin yields, and banking concerns remain negotiation obstacles. 🧠 Even if congressional seats change, further negotiation, revision, and voting are needed, so legislative progress is uncertain.
Meanwhile, ETF fund flows and interest rate expectations are more direct short-term variables. If institutions continue to reduce positions, election sentiment alone is unlikely to sustain a continuous rise. ⚠️ I will focus on whether ETF funds can stop outflows after the non-farm payroll data release and whether BTC can regain and hold above 78,000. On the downside, watch 76,000 first; if broken, then pay attention to 74,000–74,900. Today, do you trust political narratives more, or real capital flows? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥Stop treating the U.S. elections as a BTC price pump button! Whether the Democrats or Republicans hold the advantage affects the political arithmetic of the future Congress, but it won't directly create buying pressure in the market. BTC has been tugging around $77,000 today, with the Fear and Greed Index dropping to 33. There were $282 million liquidations across the network in 24 hours, including $211 million losses on long positions.📉 The price seems to fluctuate only slightly, but leveraged funds have already paid the price.
What really deserves attention is the CLARITY Act. The Senate procedural vote on September 15 failed to pass, with 49 votes in favor and 50 against, still short of the 60 votes needed to advance. The controversy is not only about the regulatory framework but also includes ethics provisions for public officials, stablecoin yield structures, and conflicts of interest between banks and the crypto industry.🧩 Changing the majority party does not mean these divisions will automatically disappear.
Continuous ETF outflows and tight macro interest rate expectations are the key reasons for current capital hesitation.⚠️ In the short term, watch for support at $76,000; if broken, focus on $74,000–$74,900; on the rebound, see if funds truly flow back. Elections provide a long-term narrative, but daily ETF subscriptions and redemptions more directly affect buying and selling forces. Do you think BTC will hold $76,000 first or continue downward to find support? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #Circle财报在即，稳定币增长能否兑现收益？
Yes, but profits will be significantly diluted. Expansion in scale (increase in USDC circulation) can indeed bring more reserve income such as U.S. Treasury interest, but this does not mean net profits will surge proportionally.
· The key obstacle is "cost": Circle needs to pay very high "distribution costs" (revenue sharing) to major channels like Coinbase. In addition, the Federal Reserve's future interest rate cut expectations will directly reduce its interest income.🔥If historical patterns continue to hold, is BTC's cycle bottom arriving earlier each year? Looking back at 2014, 2018, and 2022, the U.S. midterm elections all occurred near the end of Bitcoin bear markets, with the actual cycle lows appearing about 71 days, 39 days, and 13 days after the elections, respectively. 📉 From the time intervals, there is indeed a trend of gradual shortening, which is why many cycle analysts keep a close eye on the midterm elections.
However, we cannot conclude that the fourth low will definitely come earlier just because the previous three lows have moved closer to the election date. Each market cycle has its own variables: 2014 had exchange platform crises, 2018 experienced an industry winter, and 2022 saw the FTX incident. The halving cycle provides an observational framework, but liquidity and sudden risks can also alter the trend. ⚠️
What’s more noteworthy is that the BTC phase low in 2026 already appeared in July, about four months before the November election. Whether this time the bottom is early or there will be a second dip later cannot be determined yet. 🧭 I prefer to observe whether the low holds, if trading volume recovers, and whether the long-term moving averages can be reclaimed. Do you think this round of adjustment has already ended early? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥Three U.S. midterm elections, three times BTC continued to test new lows after the elections. This timing pattern deserves serious study! After the 2014 election, it took about 71 days for BTC to hit the cycle low; about 39 days after 2018; about 13 days after 2022.📊 Looking only at these three data sets, the timing of the lows does seem to be gradually advancing, as if each bear market completes its final panic sell-off after the election results are settled.
But here is a key issue: coincidence in timing does not mean the election caused the decline. In 2014, there was the aftermath of the Mt.Gox incident; in 2018, there was an internal crisis in the crypto market; in 2022, the FTX collapse was an additional factor.🧠 What really drives BTC to bottom may be the combined effects of the halving cycle, liquidity, industry risks, and the macro environment, rather than a single political event.
🌍 In 2026, a different situation appeared: the phase low already occurred in July, earlier than the November election. This suggests the market may have completed part of its adjustment early, or it might just be a temporary low that still needs to be verified later. When discussing cycles today, we cannot just look at historical numbers; we must also consider price structure and capital flows. Do you think this time will continue the pattern of the previous three rounds, or will it take a completely different path? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥 Dữ liệu lịch sử cảnh báo BTC có thể giảm sâu thậm chí 65k sau vụ hack Binance - Theo thống kê được chia sẻ, mức giảm trung vị của BTC sau 10 vụ hack lớn trên các sàn CEX là 10,14%, cao hơn mức giảm hiện tại 5,61%. - Nếu diễn biến lặp lại, kịch bản được dự báo là BTC có thể lùi về 72.998 USD trước ngày 7/11. - Kịch bản xấu hơn, tương tự sau vụ hack Bybit, là vùng 65.231 USD. 🫡🫡🫡 Lưu ý, đây là kịch bản dự báo dựa trên dữ liệu lịch sử, không phải mục tiêu giá chắc chắn. Các vụ hack trước đâAn institution focused on data changing its name often says more about the trend than a research report.
L2BEAT, which has been tracking Ethereum Layer 2 for years, has officially renamed itself ETHBEAT, expanding its scope from Layer 2 to the entire Ethereum ecosystem. The name has changed, and so has the coverage: it will continue monitoring L2s while increasing research on privacy, interoperability, tokens, zero-knowledge proofs, and native Rollups, and will also explore liquid staking in the future.
But the real signal is not in expanding categories, but in the evaluation criteria. Its research focus has shifted to judging whether a project inherits Ethereum's core security properties—censorship resistance, open source, privacy, security—and how many intermediaries users still have to trust. The accompanying move is the launch of the CROPS guide, which includes projects that meet these principles.
In recent years, Layer 2s competed on being cheap and fast, with valuation justified by high TPS. Now the yardstick has changed: for the same project, the question is how much trust you place in whom.
This is a plus for $ETH itself, as the mainnet's security properties have become the anchor for the entire ecosystem; for Layer 2 tokens like $ARB and $OP, it's a retest—scaling dividends have mostly been absorbed, and the remaining premium must be earned through credibility.
One point worth pondering: while everyone is racing to be faster, some are starting to compete on who requires less trust from you. 🔥Three U.S. midterm elections, three times BTC continued to test new lows after the elections. This timing pattern deserves serious study! After the 2014 election, it took about 71 days for BTC to hit the cycle low; about 39 days after 2018; about 13 days after 2022.📊 Looking only at these three data sets, the timing of the lows does seem to be gradually advancing, as if each bear market completes its final panic sell-off after the election results are settled.
But here is a key issue: coincidence in timing does not mean the election caused the decline. In 2014, there was the aftermath of the Mt.Gox incident; in 2018, there was an internal crisis in the crypto market; in 2022, the FTX collapse was an additional factor.🧠 What really drives BTC to bottom may be the combined effects of the halving cycle, liquidity, industry risks, and the macro environment, rather than a single political event.
🌍 In 2026, a different situation appeared: the phase low already occurred in July, earlier than the November election. This suggests the market may have completed part of its adjustment early, or it might just be a temporary low that still needs to be verified later. When discussing cycles today, we cannot just look at historical numbers; we must also consider price structure and capital flows. Do you think this time will continue the pattern of the previous three rounds, or will it take a completely different path? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Solana official released a chart: on Monday, tokenized stock single-day trading volume was about $657 million, more than double any day since September. Backpack Securities alone contributed about $598 million, accounting for about 91%; xStocks about $56 million, following behind.
Strong trading volume does not mean the order book is already decentralized. It is more likely that a single issuer maximized weekend and after-hours flow, while other issuers temporarily lag behind. The impressive numbers indicate demand exists but also show that depth is still tied to one desk. Don't take the peak as the normal depth.
If within seven days Backpack's share remains above 85%, or tokenized stock daily trading falls below $320 million, treat this as a pulse peak, not the market norm. Snapshot around 18:08 Beijing time, Binance spot SOL about $93.19, 24h approximately +0.9%.
$SOL
#SOL #Solana #Tokenized#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 朋友理智一点，民主党拿下参众两院，后面很难再有顺畅的单边行情了。 之前市场一直在定价一条主线：白宫和国会同属共和党，减税、宽松财政、加密友好监管，整套政策预期支撑着纳指科技和比特币这一轮的上行想象。现在格局直接反转，国会拿到了制衡权，特朗普原本计划推进的宽松议程，推进难度会大幅抬升。 最先承压的就是AI赛道。民主党主导的委员会会加大对大型科技企业的听证与监管审查，算力补贴、税收优惠的预期被打折扣，这也是纳指期货早盘一度深跌超2%的核心原因。资金第一时间重新定价“特朗普交易”的溢价，高估值科技资产的波动会被持续放大。 落到加密资产这边就更微妙。原本市场期待的稳定币、数字资产清晰化立法，节奏会被拖慢。民主党内部对加密行业的监管态度偏谨慎，SEC的强监管路线会得到国会层面的呼应，行业利好法案的落地窗口被压缩。当然总统保有否决权，也不会直接出台极端禁令，不是单纯的全盘利空，而是利好预期消失，博弈变多。 再看财政端，两党拉扯之下，大规模财政扩张很难落地，赤字、发债节奏都会受到约束，美债收益率的波动会变得更频繁。流动性预期不再是一边倒，叠加美联The market isn't lacking liquidity. The bigger question is where that capital is willing to take risk.
BTC is showing healthier positioning, with $136.6M in spot inflows against $79.88M in contract outflows. That suggests genuine buying interest without an aggressive reliance on leverage.
ETH is attracting money from both sides, but the $156M in contract inflows compared with $88M in spot suggests leverage is doing much of the heavy lifting. #DemocratsWinCongress 🔥The Democratic Party has won control of both chambers of Congress. What deserves the most attention next is not just whether Trump's policies will be obstructed, but how the market will reprice political risk! The U.S. midterm elections show a clear shift: the Republican Party has lost control of both chambers, and the Democratic Party has gained more space for hearings, investigations, and oversight. 🌐There are indeed capital donations, industry lobbying, and interest group influences behind U.S. politics, but these complex relationships cannot be simplified as a certain group controlling both parties; such claims lack reliable evidence.
🔎Will Elon Musk become a key focus of a new round of congressional investigations? Democratic lawmakers have already signaled this possibility, and future scrutiny may revolve around DOGE, government contracts, and potential conflicts of interest. However, whether the investigation uncovers any issues depends on evidence and formal conclusions; premature judgments are not appropriate.
📉On the crypto side, I am more concerned about BTC at 74,800–75,000. If this level does not hold, the market may shift from weak consolidation to a more obvious downtrend; if support is effective, there is still a chance to continue consolidating. Those adding positions around 76,500–77,500 should not pin their hopes on a single rebound. Borrowing to add positions is especially risky, as leverage can turn a normal pullback into an unbearable loss. ⚠️Will you continue to observe tonight, or are you already preparing to adjust your positions? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥The Democratic Party has taken control of both chambers of Congress, changing the power dynamics in Washington, and the crypto community will need to reassess risks accordingly! This election is not just a simple win or loss for the two parties; it also involves the redistribution of policy directions, corporate interests, capital support, and congressional oversight authority. 🌍 Reducing complex politics to a certain group controlling both parties lacks reliable evidence and overlooks the real institutional and interest struggles that influence policy.
🧭 What’s worth watching next is whether the Democratic Party will formally push for investigations into Musk, DOGE, and related government contracts and conflicts of interest. Some Democratic lawmakers have already proposed investigation directions, but whether it will be launched, the scope of the investigation, and whether a chain of evidence can be formed still require time to verify.
📉 The real danger signal for the market is whether BTC can hold the 74,800–75,000 range. If this area is effectively broken down, selling pressure may continue to expand; if it holds, the price may still fluctuate repeatedly within this key range. Funds entering or adding positions near 76,500–77,500 should not only think about a rebound to break even but also calculate how much drawdown they can bear. Especially avoid borrowing money to add positions or using high leverage to bet on policy news. Do you think this election will change the risk appetite of the crypto market? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 美国中期选举临近，市场预期国会走向分裂，CLARITY 法案此前已经在参议院停滞，民主党影响力抬升可能让加密相关立法节奏放缓、争议增多。行政权仍由特朗普掌握，所以即便民主党拿下众议院，现有监管执法基调不会立刻反转，这种政策格局让市场很难一次性定价完毕。 比特币（$BTC）价格回落至约77000，4小时走势转弱，76500附近是重要支撑。如果这个支撑失守，选举带来的不确定性会放大抛压；在这之前，资金更倾向降低敞口而非加仓。 值得留意的是，不同币种对政策预期的敏感度并不一样。以太坊（$ETH）、SOL（$SOL）、XRP（$XRP）、DOGE（$DOGE）相比比特币（$BTC）更容易受到监管时间表变化的冲击。市场博弈的不是选举结果本身，而是最终席位和前期预期之间的差值。民主党拿下众议院基本已经被 price in，参议院才是超预期变数所在。如果任意一方出人意料地拿下两院，$ETH、$SOL、$XRP、$DOGE 的定价都会迎来重估。短期交易重心优先盯紧 76500 这一线能否守住，选举消息的影响，或许还不如这个支撑位的有效性重要。$UNI UNI's market is a bit top-heavy.
The liquidity pool has shrunk by nearly 30% in a week, yet the long-short ratio has surged to 2.48. Money is flowing out, but leveraged longs are still crowded inside.
This structure really can't withstand a crash. If a little selling pressure comes down, the slippage could trigger stop-losses for longs one by one. The biggest problem now is that there may be more people wanting to exit than those willing to take the positions.
#UNI
$UNI
👇Elon Musk spent 445 million to support the Republican Party, essentially as a business bet and political insurance, not simply an ideological stance. His Tesla and SpaceX are rooted in Texas, requiring relaxed regulations and government aerospace contracts. If the Democrats control Congress, they are likely to tighten regulations on autonomous driving and AI, and also review SpaceX's federal contracts, harming its business interests.
This money was mainly invested in Texas and other red states to help Republicans retain seats, attempting to maintain a policy environment favorable to himself, but the bet failed as the Republicans suffered a heavy defeat this round, and the investment did not yield the expected returns.
This also confirms the capital logic of U.S. elections: many capital tycoons donate money to support candidates with the goal of gaining policy favors and paving the way for their own businesses; however, money cannot guarantee election victories, as public opinion and other factors also influence the results.
Subsequent risks: After the Democrats take control of Congress, Musk's companies may face higher regulatory pressure and scrutiny risks.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 🔥The U.S. midterm elections brought an overnight upheaval, but BTC has not yet seen a definitive rebound because of it! The Democratic Party took control of both the House and Senate, while the Republican Party suffered a clear setback, meaning that Trump's upcoming policy initiatives may face stronger congressional checks and balances.📊 Behind the elections, of course, there is a struggle among capital, interest groups, and political donations, but the results cannot be simply attributed to manipulation by any single group or financial consortium. What truly deserves attention is how the new Congress will exercise its oversight powers.
👀 One focus going forward is whether the Democratic Party will push for a deeper investigation into Musk and his related government projects. Democratic lawmakers have already expressed intentions to investigate, but what they will uncover and whether a formal conclusion will be reached cannot be judged in advance.
Returning to the crypto space, the most important level for BTC right now is the 74,800–75,000 support line.⚠️ If it breaks down effectively, market panic could intensify; if it holds, there is still a chance for short-term oscillations. The high-level replenishment funds around 76,500–77,500 also face pullback and leverage pressure. Don’t borrow money to average down your cost; the market won’t reverse just because you refuse to accept losses. Today, do you think political changes will first affect market sentiment, or will BTC’s technicals give direction first? #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 Bitcoin’s $75,000 line is no longer just a chart level. It has become the pressure point where leveraged longs are concentrated, and derivatives data suggests that a break below it could trigger roughly $1.001 billion in long liquidations across major centralized exchanges. That figure does not guarantee a decline, but it maps where the market’s most fragile positioning sits. The mechanics matter more than the headline number. Above $75,000, buy-side leverage has built up heavily. If that floor #تقرير أرباح Circle على الأبواب، هل يمكن لنمو العملات المستقرة أن يحقق عوائد؟ Gold has crossed 4000, while BEAT is still grinding below 0.10
$BTC has risen from a low of 75736.38 to 77929.42, approaching the upper end of the 24-hour range. In the last 3 full hours, it increased by 2.0%, but the trading volume was 21.6% less than the previous 3 hours.
I acknowledge the efficiency of the price rebound, but the momentum has not accelerated accordingly. This is a phase of price re-accumulation, and the strength should not simply replicate the initial speed when leaving the low point.
$BEAT has dropped 3.5% in the past 24 hours, quoted at 0.09925, still below 0.10. The most recent settled funding rate was +0.0062%, meaning longs pay shorts.
When the price is weak, longs still bear this holding cost. I focus more on whether the price can break away; the funding rate level does not equal the probability of a rise, and sideways movement in the short term will also test holders' patience.
$XAU Gold has moved up from around 3960 to cross 4000, quoted at 4025.79, having left the previous back-and-forth area near 3940.
This time, I am somewhat optimistic about price expansion, as there are actual transactions above 4000 as evidence. After pushing up to 4036.2 and pulling back slightly, this is a retracement that is not enough to erase the entire upward move.
RENDER has risen 4.0% in the last 3 hours, with aggressive buy volume accounting for 60.7%, but total volume decreased by 50.2% compared to the previous 3 hours.
What I see is that when trading volume contracts, the transaction method leans more toward aggressive buying. The upward direction is clear, but participation scale has not expanded. Combining these two pieces of evidence, the assessment should be positive but measured.The US has given the green light to perpetual contracts on stocks, and this matter deserves some discussion.
On November 3rd, CFTC Chairman Selig signed off: perpetual futures linked to US individual stocks can now be listed on regulated exchanges in the US. No expiration date, no need for rollovers, funding rates anchored to spot prices—this mechanism, which has been played with in the crypto world for years, is officially entering Wall Street.
Only four firms received licenses in the first batch: Kalshi, Coinbase, Kraken, and Crypto.com. Kalshi plans to list 58 popular stocks, including Apple, Tesla, and Nvidia, with a leverage cap of about 6.5x and a margin floor around 15%.
The on-chain sector is also restless: Lighter will submit DCM/DCO applications in November, and Hyperliquid is directly partnering with ICE to build a compliant market.
But Wall Street reacted faster—Citadel and Cboe immediately filed lawsuits in federal court the same day, demanding the approval be revoked; SIFMA and Nasdaq also sent letters to the SEC opposing it. Simply put, 0DTE options are their lifeblood, and perpetual contracts, which require no rollovers and can be traded almost 24/7, will divert order flow.
The next 60 days are critical: whether regulators can hold firm and whether the court will issue an injunction. If it succeeds, the crypto-native derivatives mechanism will truly have landed.
#Web3 #USStocks #PerpetualContracts #Coinbase The Democratic Party swept Congress, but BTC rebounded against the trend! Did the bears underestimate the market?
The Democrats took control of both the House and Senate, meaning Trump's fiscal and regulatory agenda for the next two years will face stronger checks and balances. However, BTC did not continue to fall; instead, it quickly rebounded from below $76,000 to retake around $78,000.
The reason is that the market is trading not only on policy negatives but also on capital changes after expectations are realized. As the election results become clearer, the dollar weakens and risk appetite warms; on election day, BTC options saw a nominal volume of about $660 million, with call option purchases clearly dominant, and short covering may have amplified the rebound.
Historically, BTC has risen an average of about 53.7% in the 12 months following the last three midterm elections, but the sample size is very small, so this cannot be directly extrapolated to the current cycle.
My view: It is unwise to blindly short in the short term, and short positions around $79,488 must have clear invalidation conditions. Next, focus on ETF capital flows, dollar trends, and whether the price can hold key resistance. You can stick to your directional view, but you cannot stubbornly bear the risk. $BTC #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 With $1.042B in cumulative BTC ETF outflows and total net assets falling to $98.1B, institutional demand is clearly facing pressure. A few corporate Bitcoin purchases can not offset that kind of selling
The bigger issue is the quality of demand. Buying BTC through leveraged financing or raising capital to support treasury holdings is not the same as sustained spot accumulation
#BTCInstitutionalDemand 昨晚最让我睡不踏实的不是行情跌了，是那个一亿美元级别的多单离爆仓只剩几十美元的距离。 你敢信吗，30倍BTC多单的清算缓冲只剩398美元？ 先把这个案例拆开看，它其实是一份很典型的资金偏好切片。 - 某地址昨天开出约10.1亿美元的多头组合，覆盖BTC、ETH、HYPE、ZEC四个标的 - 当前浮亏约172.5万美元，其中HYPE贡献61.8万、BTC 70.9万 - BTC用30倍杠杆，ETH 15倍，HYPE和ZEC各10倍 - 四个仓位距离清算线的缓冲分别只剩398、86、6.58、38美元级别 这里真正值得盯的不是亏损数字，而是杠杆分布透露的偏好。30倍压在BTC上，说明这个账户把BTC当成"最稳的抵押品"去放大敞口，反而在HYPE这种高波动资产上收了杠杆。听起来很反直觉，但恰恰反映了一种资金心态：越是被认为共识强的标的，越敢上重杠杆；越是叙事新的，越留一点余地。问题是，这种结构在剧烈波动里最先崩的往往不是山寨，而是那个"最放心"的仓位。 传导到市场层面，这类高杠杆多头的存在会改变短期节奏。只要BTC再往下探一点，清算引擎就可能被动吃掉这批仓位，形成短时卖压，然后情绪面跟着放大On the eve of the $ZEC upgrade, can the NU7 upgrade unlock a singularity in the privacy track?
Key highlights of the NU7 upgrade:
First, block time is compressed from 75 seconds to 25 seconds, significantly improving transaction confirmation speed, officially enabling commercial payment attributes.
Second, Orchard privacy transaction TPS increases from 2.9 to 6.6, solving past issues of privacy transaction lag and inability to handle large funds.
Third, after the upgrade, the old v4 transactions become invalid, and assets in the original Sprout pool that are not migrated will be permanently locked. Position holders need to hedge in advance.
At the same time, NU7 launches the NSM network long-term mechanism, reconstructing the fee economic model:
40% of fees are immediately distributed to miners, 60% are allocated to protocol reserves and temporarily withdrawn from circulation, with gradual release to subsidize miner income after 2031.
Currently, nearly 30% of ZEC's circulating assets are deposited in privacy pools.
From a valuation perspective, the current ZEC price is $1200, with a market cap ratio to BTC of about 1.35%.
There are three reference ranges:
$700–900, accounting for 0.8%-1% of BTC market cap, representing a high cost-performance value floor;
$900–1300, accounting for 1%-1.5% of BTC market cap, a neutral oscillation range;
$1300–1800, accounting for 1.5%-2% of BTC market cap, a growth premium range.
Compared to previous mainstream old coin historical cycles, mainstream old coins' peak values generally reach 3% of BTC market cap, corresponding to a ZEC target price of 2600+. $BNB
CZ said this is "another attack against Binance," with 11,700 hostile posts and 1,083 accounts.
The numbers are intimidating. I reviewed today's market: the low point of 680.37 occurred at 11 AM, that 1-hour candle smashed out 1.27 million volume, the highest real-money volume of the day. Then it climbed back to 705, now at 701.8.
During the hours with the most criticism, the price was rising. The money that lifted 680 has nothing to do with sentiment.
The fee rate is 0.01%, just on the baseline, not a penny more. Positions just over 50 million, barely moved in eight hours. No one is betting on direction.
This year, I was scared off by BNB's public opinion twice, both times at the lows. This time I won't look at posts, only trust the 680 line.
Let them criticize, my position isn't worth them making posts about.$BTC
7,500 BTC, $572 million, transferred at 17:38 to an untagged wallet.
Two years ago when I saw this kind of news flash, the first thing I did was cut long positions. Today I watched the market for ten minutes, the price moved from 78,300 to 78,350, 24-hour high 78,533, not giving an inch.
Open interest is 2.76 billion, a bit thicker than two hours ago. Funding rate 0.0078%, staying below the 0.01% baseline for two consecutive settlement periods. Those wanting to chase should stop, and those wanting to dump haven’t really acted.
The real concern with this kind of transfer is if the recipient wallet is tagged as an exchange deposit. Untagged wallets historically are mostly custody migrations or internal consolidations. Those truly preparing to dump never broadcast in advance.
So I neither added nor reduced. It has been sideways above 78,300 for over seven hours, both sides are waiting.
Waiting for it to give its own direction, I won’t choose for it.
#美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 #Circle財報在即，穩定幣成長能否轉化為收益？
Circle will announce its Q3 earnings at 8 AM Eastern Time on November 4. The focus is whether the growth in USDC scale can translate into retainable earnings; as of 6 PM Taiwan time on November 4, the results have not yet been released. At the end of last quarter, USDC circulation was $73.3 billion, a 19% year-over-year increase; combined revenue and reserve income totaled $701 million, up 7% year-over-year, but reserve income only grew by 5%. The company noted that the average circulation increased by 25%, partially offset by a 66 basis point decline in reserve yield, with distribution, trading, and other costs reaching $412 million. This indicates that scale expansion does not necessarily drive profit growth in tandem; interest rates and distribution costs are equally critical. After the earnings release, it will be possible to verify changes in Q3 average circulation, reserve yield, distribution costs, and net profit, distinguishing quarterly data from real-time market prices.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.Today BTC first probed around $75,700, then was pulled back to around $77,800, rising about 1.7% in 24 hours. ETH is around $2,290, up 1.7%. The above data is for November 4th. It will still fluctuate before the close, so real-time data should be taken as the standard. Why did it first drop then rebound today? I think it's like meeting your partner's parents, then realizing your palms are sweaty on the way home. First, the Democrats took the House, and there is progress in the Senate; uncertainty has settled. BTC bounced back from below $76,000 to $78,000. Simply put, it's a sigh of relief after all the bad news, not a reversal. Second, everyone worries that market structure bills like CLARITY might be delayed. Changing the head of the family in a relationship doesn't mean the marriage is off, just that the bride price needs to be renegotiated. Third, the probability of a Fed rate hike in December is still around 80%. About $1 billion flowed out of spot ETFs in the past two days. Money has become more expensive, so people are less willing to go on dates. This is more long-term than the election. Another small detail: the SEC has issued supplementary explanations on token classification these days. Speaking in the group doesn't mean you are the group owner. This is genuinely friendly to governance tokens. Congress is slow, regulation is moving forward. Emotions and fundamentals should be viewed separately. Outlook for tomorrow: I won't guess the direction. Guessing right is luck; guessing wrong is tuition. Technically, $76,000 to $76,600 is support; $79,500 to $80,500 is resistance. After the election bad news is out, next to watch are rate hikes and ETF funds. The panic index is still above 30, somewhat cautious. Operation advice: peace, no calls. What was said on election night is all no longer relevant Election results have landed. The market first took a hit. BTC dropped from 77049 down to 75734.5. That was the low point. Then it pulled back to 78434.5, current price about +1.80%, with a volatility of 3.67%. ETH followed, at 2323.5, about +2.43%.
My judgment is simple: that low point was sentiment, not pricing.
There is only one reason. When the news came out, those pressing buttons were following the old script—regulation would tighten. After the drop, it was found that no one was stepping in below. The buy side was thin, and the sell side was also thin. So once it pulled, it bounced back. This was not new money entering, but sellers finishing their sales in one go.
A volatility of 3.67% is not small. But the price returned above the open. The real information lies on the low side: the selling pressure came in one wave, with no second wave.
Therefore, I believe the election factor’s effect on the coin price has been fully explained in this drop and pullback. Using it to explain further rises or falls is just making excuses.
If you want to refute me, answer this question directly: Is the 75734.5 low the bottom of this round, or just the first probe? Choose one. #美国中期选举：民主党赢得国会两院控制权 $BTC $ETH 78,389.4 USD, a slight 0.94% increase in 24 hours. The market looks calm on the surface, but the underlying structure is tearing apart. On one side, open interest has dropped to 284.1 billion USD, the lowest in 12 months, with most of the leverage accumulated over the past year basically cleared out. On the other side, BTC perpetual funding rates remain stuck at +0.0100%, with longs continuing to pay shorts. The 8-hour average funding rate on some exchanges has already turned negative to -0.0044%, with shorts starting to pay longs, but this is localized, not global. If you put these two sets of data together: leverage is gone, but the funding rate hasn’t returned to zero. This is not the classic bottom pattern—the classic bottom is when the funding rate turns negative first, longs pay enough and are willing to concede, then the market truly clears. The current state is closer to "chips have cleared, but those left are still holding on." Conditional: if the funding rate does not show a global negative shift soon, the sideways consolidation may last longer than most expect. The macro environment is also uncooperative. The US spot Bitcoin ETF has seen net outflows for three consecutive trading days, totaling 1.157 billion USD, with BlackRock’s IBIT accounting for 734 million USD of that. The price has pulled back from below 76,000 to around 78,000, but ETF buying has not returned. Key resistance levels: 78,500, 77,600. Support levels: 76,500, 75,250. --- ETH: high turnover, low open interest, shorts are holding 🔥🖊 2,321.88 USD, 24h +1.01%. ETH’s contract structure is more honest and also more tangled than BTC’s.I've never quite understood: a company hasn't gone public, its stock price doesn't jump daily, so how did it suddenly become worth $115 billion?
The answer is quite simple — a few old shareholders transferred their shares to others, the price was agreed upon, and that price became the default "fair value." The company didn't receive new money, but the label was attached. A year ago it was $75 billion, now it's up 53%, and based on $2.3 billion pre-tax profit, that's nearly 50 times.
My first reaction: does this have anything to do with the $BTC I hold? Not really in the short term; it will still fluctuate. But at least it shows that funds willing to pay a high price for the story are still around. It's just that this price was negotiated behind closed doors, and whether the next buyer accepts it once the door opens is another matter.A UK fintech company that has not yet gone public was recently valued at $115 billion by the market through a secondary transfer of existing shares. No new shares were issued, yet the valuation was established first.
Looking at the numbers: the market valuation in November 2025 is about $75 billion, an increase of approximately 53% in one year; the pre-tax profit in 2025 is about $2.3 billion, corresponding to nearly 50 times earnings. Such a multiple is almost impossible for a traditional bank, but institutions are willing to pay it for a super app that handles payments, accounts, and credit.
Mechanically, this is a secondary market circulation among existing shareholders; no new money enters the company’s books, and the capital structure is not diluted. Two things change: early holders lock in book gains at this price level; the valuation discovery function partially shifts from public issuance and listing review to a closed private secondary market.
Regulators do not see a whole but rather business bricks: payment transfers fall under payment institutions or electronic money institutions, quasi-accounts have a separate set of client fund reserve requirements, and once it involves quasi-deposits, it must answer which license governs it. Adding crypto asset services, the EU requires client asset segregation, separate licensing, and enhanced disclosure.
Therefore, the meaning of the $115 billion is not successful financing but that pricing power has been handed over to a group of leading institutions, while regulatory standards have simultaneously advanced. The price is first set in a closed market before discussing the public market, where ordinary investors receive either a discount or the residual value after others have locked in gains.$BTC Observation: Spot ETF has had outflows for 3 consecutive days totaling $1.16 billion, but single-day outflow has shrunk to $116 million
BTC currently at $78,416, up 1.78% in 24 hours, recovering from $75,734 intraday, ETF still experiencing outflows, price has first stopped falling
Reviewing these three days: October 30 outflow $643 million, November 2 $399 million, November 3 $116 million, single-day scale about 71% less than the previous day (SoSoValue)
On November 3, BlackRock IBIT outflow $94.98 million, while Bitwise BITB, Fidelity FBTC, and Morgan Stanley MSBT had net inflows
Bitwise research head Dragosch believes this is a short-term hedge after the Binance hack, not a structural institutional withdrawal; none of the 15 institutions they surveyed reduced their ETF exposure
Fear & Greed Index rose from 26 to 34, still in the fear zone; before outflows turn to inflows, staying above 78,000 is not yet confirmed.
#BTC现货ETF资金流出，企业财库增持放缓 AMD guidance of 17 billion shatters expectations, after-hours surged to 530 then gave back half, I’m not chasing.
Q3 revenue 13.38 billion USD, market expected 13.06 billion; adjusted EPS 2.09, expected 1.95.
Data center revenue nearly doubled to 8.55 billion, a new high.
Q4 guidance about 17 billion (±3%), market only expected 16.23 billion, midpoint year-over-year +66%.
In October AMD fell 17.5%, Philadelphia Semiconductor Index was down 15.4% in the same period.
From the 10/6 high of 658.52 to the 11/2 low of 466.07, a pullback of about 29%.
On 11/3 closed at 484.47 (+3.8%), after-hours peaked at 530.38, before 8 PM Eastern returned to around 508.
I think the earnings report is solid, the guidance is truly strong.
But the after-hours surge and pullback shows the market is still afraid of an AI capital expenditure bubble; one earnings report can’t turn the whole sector’s sentiment.
I observe and don’t chase; regular session must hold above 520 (10/30 high) to consider the gap fill recovered, MA20 and MA50 still pressuring above 550.
If it breaks below 466, this rebound is invalidated.
Is the 17 billion guidance ironclad proof AI chips haven’t peaked, or is the after-hours surge and pullback your chance to exit?
$AMD $NVDA
#美股财报 #AI需求支撑存储市场，芯片股行情反复 ETH surged with volume this hour, while BTC lagged slightly at the high point.
The afternoon recovery didn't immediately retrace: BTC continued to rise over the next few full hourly candles, and ETH held around 2280. Around 18:00 Beijing time, the spot prices for the two coins were approximately 78401 and 2322.8, nearing their respective 24-hour highs. The earlier statement "repair remains to be verified" can now be updated to say the hourly level continuation is still ongoing.
Looking closely at the volume, the situation isn't exactly the same. ETH's last full hourly candle surged to about 2329, with volume clearly above recent averages; BTC reached 78520 in the same hour, but volume did not increase correspondingly. I pay more attention to this divergence: prices rising together does not mean both sides have equally solid follow-through.
Before evening, observe from 15 minutes to 1 hour intervals. BTC's support lies between 78300–78340, a zone where recent 15-minute candles repeatedly stopped falling; resistance is between 78520–78562, overlapping the recent swing high and 24-hour high. Only if volume expands and closes above the upper boundary can we consider the repair continuing; if the hourly candle closes below 78300, the high-level hold is questionable.
For ETH, support is at 2315–2318, where short-term lows and pullback closes concentrate; resistance is at 2329–2330, where the hourly high and 24-hour high coincide. Holding above this level supports continuation of strength; losing the lower boundary suggests a pullback first. Both coins are near highs, volatility may increase, so be cautious of risk. $BTC $ETHOld Leek Observation｜$OSMO: Burning 55.5 million tokens, why am I not rushing to be bullish?
Today, a small-cap target worth paying attention to: Osmosis (OSMO). Osmosis is voting to pass Proposal 1057, planning to permanently burn 55.5 million OSMO from the community fund, pushing the total burned amount over 100 million tokens. This accounts for about 7% of the current supply.
But I believe the real point worth studying in this event is not just the "burning benefit".
First, look at the changes it has already completed:
On October 25, Proposal 1053 passed, stopping new inflation issuance of OSMO, and staking rewards are now provided by protocol revenue. Now Proposal 1057 is ready to permanently burn the 55.5 million OSMO historically accumulated in the community fund.
These two events together form a complete Tokenomics story:
Stop inflation + permanent burn + staking rewards shift to protocol revenue.
But there is a detail that cannot be ignored:
These 55.5 million tokens were already in the community fund and did not belong to the daily circulating sell pressure. This burn is more like turning the original "soft burn" into a permanent burn, rather than the market suddenly losing 7% of tradable chips.