Orbit Post Sitemap
AAPL is not recklessly spending on AI; instead, it has become the biggest safe haven in the tech sector, although the price is indeed quite high now.
But if you want a tech company that simultaneously meets "ample free cash flow, strong business capabilities, a huge consumer user base, and extremely high moat barriers," there is currently only this one!
#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单
$xAAPL Voting stations will start closing and counting votes at 7 PM tomorrow afternoon, and by early the day after tomorrow, the control of both chambers can basically be determined. $BTC $ETH $SNDK The current market consensus is very clear: the Democratic Party is very likely to regain control of the House of Representatives, with the prediction market giving a 92% chance, basically a done deal. The Senate is the real battleground; the Republicans currently hold 53 seats, and the Democrats need a net gain of 4 seats to flip it, with several swing states being fiercely contested. The Republican strategy now is to give up the House and focus all efforts on defending the Senate. The division of responsibilities between the two chambers is quite different. The House controls the purse strings, including the fiscal budget, impeachment initiation, legislative oversight, and public welfare appropriations, similar to the ancient Censorate combined with the Ministry of Revenue. The Senate handles personnel appointments, foreign treaties, and final legislative review, more like the cabinet and prime minister roles. Let's consider three scenarios: The probability that the Republicans hold both chambers is already very low, less than 10%. If that happens, Trump's crypto-friendly policies could proceed smoothly, Bitcoin might surge to 83,000 to 85,000, and oil supply-side pressures would ease. But this scenario can basically be ruled out. The most likely outcome is a split Congress, with Democrats taking the House and Republicans holding the Senate. In this case, the Democrats would launch numerous hearings and investigations, block the fiscal budget, and possibly initiate impeachment proceedings, which would be bearish for risk assets. The probability of Democrats sweeping both chambers is also not low, with the prediction market giving over 60%. Then Trump would basically be a lame duck for the next two years, with crypto legislation and easing policies stalled, but the debt ceiling battle might instead trigger some liquidity stories. Continued#AMD Earnings Preview: HeliosAI System Commercialization Progress
The leader has something to say
AMD will release its Q3 earnings after the US market closes on November 3. Previously, Q2 data center business revenue surged 107% year-over-year. The market is focusing on the commercialization of Instinct chips and Helios rack-level systems, as well as whether the demand from major cloud providers can translate into actual revenue.
I believe the macro environment facing this earnings report is extremely perilous. Last night, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plummeted 7.2%, and tech stocks are undergoing indiscriminate deleveraging bloodbath. Even if AMD's performance and guidance exceed expectations, funds will most likely take profits on the good news. In the face of a liquidity crisis, fundamentals have been temporarily set aside.
On the market, AMD rose slightly by 0.68% today, and xAMD rose 0.72%. This is just a technical rebound after a big drop; funds are cautious before the earnings report. Community forecasts show 69% believe it will beat expectations, but the key is not whether it beats or not, but whether the guidance can offset macro panic.
BTC fell below 77,000 last night and is still grinding below. Let's see if it can climb back above 80,000. If it can't hold, expect a deeper pullback, with resistance between 84,000 and 85,000 above. Don't chase the rise or sell the dip; set stop losses properly.
The above analysis is time-sensitive; stop losses must be set properly. Good luck. $BTC $ETH $SOL Policy background review combined with UBS views and the Federal Reserve dot plot shows some officials tend to believe there is still room for further rate hikes before the end of the year. The core goal of rate hikes is to cool down an overheated economy and suppress inflation.
📈 Related beneficiary assets: Historically, during rate hike cycles, the attractiveness of dollar assets strengthens, capital tends to flow back to the US, and the dollar index remains strong; short-term bond yields rise, highlighting the stable return value of cash and short-term bonds, bank net interest margins are expected to improve, and demand for energy such as crude oil is also likely to be supported.
📉 Pressured assets: On the other hand, high-valuation tech stocks represented by the Nasdaq tend to face valuation pressure; gold, which does not generate interest, often faces greater pressure when interest rates rise; rising mortgage costs also suppress real estate demand and liquidity.
⚠️ Risk warning: The above is only a review of past market patterns; market changes are uncertain and do not constitute investment advice. BTC at 78,100, do you still dare to hold it?
Binance lost $6.3 billion in a hack, ETFs saw a single-day outflow of $640 million, the Fed turned hawkish and didn't cut rates—three days ago BTC dropped to 76,200, and the whole network was shouting "the bear is here." But just now, the price stubbornly climbed back to 78,100, and Saylor is still hinting at adding positions. Is this a dead cat bounce, or your last chance to get on board?
Let's look at the surface first: all the news is telling you to "run fast."
October's high of 86,400 fell to 76,200, evaporating over $10,000 in a month. The $6.3 billion hack, ETF net outflows, the Fed holding rates on October 28 while turning hawkish, and rising odds of a December rate hike. RSI daily at 39, moving averages all pressing above the price. Technicals, news, and macro all bearish.
But look at the chart—the drop to 76,200 didn't break lower, there have been several days of slight rebounds, and the price has already touched back up to 78,100. The bad news has been absorbed, but the price isn't falling anymore. What does this mean?
First: The $6.3 billion hack—is it a disaster or the final washout?
Binance's largest hack ever, FBI points to North Korea, triggering massive liquidations and panic selling. BTC briefly dipped below 77,000.
Sounds like doomsday? But think back:
In 2014 Mt.Gox was hacked, BTC fell from 800 to 200, then later rose to 20,000
In 2016 Bitfinex lost 120,000 BTC, market panicked, then hit new highs
In 2022 FTX collapsed, BTC dropped to 16,000, then 40,000 six months later
Every exchange trust crisis is a script where retail cuts losses and institutions buy the blood. Binance has resumed withdrawals in phases, prioritizing BTC. Panic is receding, price is repairing. The market teaches you with $6.3 billion: bottoms are never in the news, but in the pits the news digs.
Second: ETFs are running, Saylor is buying, who do you trust?
On October 30, the US spot BTC ETF saw a single-day net outflow of $643 million, weekly flow turned negative. Scary?
But at the same time, Michael Saylor hinted over the weekend at continuing to increase holdings.
Institutions are of two kinds: some run based on quarterly reports, others add positions based on a five-year narrative. ETF outflows are short-term risk aversion, not long-term retreat—the cumulative net inflow is still positive, AUM pressure doesn't mean faith collapse.
If you trade based on ETF daily flows, you'll always be late. Smart money builds positions in panic, retail sells in panic—that's the difference between you and Saylor.
Third: The macro knife is the real thing pressing down BTC.
The Fed held rates at 3.75%-4.00% on October 28, two members advocated hikes, economic description changed from "solid" to "strong," hawkish to the max. CPI still sticky at 3.7%, real yields high, December hike odds rising.
High rates + strong dollar = hell for no-yield assets. BTC's "digital gold" narrative loses competitiveness against 5% risk-free returns.
But think the other way: macro is already a known bearish factor, the market priced it in long ago. The real trigger could be the November 3 midterm elections—if Republicans control Congress, crypto regulation expectations improve, this is the underestimated catalyst. Macro is pressing you, but elections might save you.
Bull vs. bear, judge for yourself
On one side:
Strong support at 76,200-77,000, hack low not broken
Saylor hints at continued buying, long-term institutions haven't fled
Panic digested, several days of rebound repair
November 3 midterms, regulatory easing expected
Short-term oversold, V-shaped rebound forming
On the other side:
$6.3 billion hack shadow lingers, trust repair slow
ETF single-day outflow of $640 million, funds not buying short-term
Fed hawkish, December hike odds rising
RSI 39 weak, moving averages pressing overhead
Breaking below 76,000 may accelerate drop to 74,000
Key levels
Resistance above: 78,800-80,600 (downtrend line) → 81,000-82,000 → October high 86,000
Support below: 76,600-77,000 (iron bottom) → 75,000-76,000 → 74,000-75,000 buying zone
Trading strategy
Conservative players (recommended for most):
Wait for a pullback to 76,500-77,000, look for long lower shadows or volume-increasing bullish candles, buy lightly in batches, stop loss below 76,000 (risk 2-3%), first target 78,800-80,000, second target 81,500-82,500. Risk-reward at least 1:2. No signal means no position, being out is also a position.
Short-term players:
If near 78,100 it can't break 78,500-79,000, reduce positions near resistance, buy near support, high sell low buy. If breaks 76,000 with volume, short lightly targeting 74,000-75,000, stop loss above 77,000.
Long-term holders:
DCA below 76,000 but prepare mentally for another 10% drop. Post-halving supply contraction, institutional channel, ETF long-term logic unchanged. 2027 target 120,000-150,000, betting on liquidity inflection + regulatory clarity.
BTC now is like 16,000 in 2022—
99% think "crypto is done," but six months later it hit 40,000.
$BTC $ETH $SOL CoinGecko's top trending search is again $HYPE. As of 15:05 Beijing time on November 2, OKX spot is at 85.45, down about 3% in 24h, with total network volume around 1.17 billion USD, and a 7-day increase of about 12%, still some distance from the September high of 97.96.
The hype comes from two points: NYSE parent company ICE partnering with Trade[XYZ] to launch a compliant perpetual contract for US users based on Hyperliquid, pending CFTC approval; DefiLlama shows Hyperliquid's protocol revenue in the past 30 days is about 65.1 million USD, continuously used for buybacks.
My view: On-chain real revenue plus traditional financial endorsement make HYPE's fundamentals very strong among top DeFi projects. However, after the positive news landed, the price has retreated from around 98, digesting the news in the short term. Next, I am watching two things: the progress of CFTC approval and whether revenue can hold up in a weak market. If revenue remains stable, this pullback looks more like a rotation rather than a market top. Just ran through the $BTC cross-exchange order book and underlying derivatives data for the past 24 days. From late October, the price dropped from 84,875 down to 76,270, a nearly $8,600 decline that forced many high-leverage longs off their positions. But today (November 2), after the market bounced back to the 78,340 level, the underlying data showed an extremely unusual divergence signal. 1. Core order book data breakdown: Three divergences you must watch. Open Interest (OI) hits a new phase high against the trend, indicating capital is secretly accumulating. Many cut losses at 76k, but the data doesn't lie: OKX's contract open interest (OI) not only didn't shrink due to the drop but surged from 3.24 billion in mid-October to a peak of 3.77 billion, currently steady at 3.698 billion (Binance's total network OI also remains high at 95,400 BTC). This shows that the main institutional funds on the market haven't left; there is heavy counterparty turnover and position building in the 76,270-78,000 range. CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta) and price "bottom divergence" repair. Over the past two weeks, OKX's CVD dropped continuously from -333,000 to -2,262,000, indicating that previously it was mainly aggressive sell orders (Taker Sell) pushing the price down. But in the last 48 hours, although CVD remains low, the price refused to make new lows and stabilized above 78,000—a typical passive limit buy wall has been established, with institutions using iceberg orders to absorb panic selling. Long-short ratioThe reason for the sudden drop of $HYPE has been found!
Paradigm unstaked 2.55 million $HYPE in the past two days, worth about 224 million USD! Although it was only unstaking and no selling, the market started to panic and drop!
Following the previous wave of large holders unstaking, another round of large holder unstaking operations has begun!
Although there has been positive news for $HYPE recently, the large holder unstaking operations have also caused panic among holders!
#OKX、ICE与Trade.xyz联手，推动永续合约进入美国合规市场 $XDP is a project generating yields from the XRP/RLUSD treasury, with real TVL and a user base. XDP is its Base chain utility governance token. Market cap is $18-22 million, with only about 12% in circulation.
The biggest issue is extreme token concentration: the top 10 addresses hold 93.91%, clearly dominated by whales. The next unlock on 11/28 is only 0.89% (about $1.6 million), so short-term pressure is low, but the team/investors releasing tokens after a one-year lockup poses a medium-term risk.
The 2-hour chart oscillates between 0.017 and 0.0195, with support at 0.01793 and resistance at 0.01836. Short-term trading can be done lightly around this range with strict stop-loss; mid-term requires monitoring treasury growth and whale movements, currently the cost-performance ratio is average. Long-term outlook is bearish, but a pump cannot be ruled out.$TRUMP The bears in this market are completely holding on stubbornly.
There are over two hundred bear whales, still holding positions worth 14 million dollars, with an average price around 1.83.
The bulls don't need to put in much effort now; just a slight push upwards to touch the cost line, and the bears' stop-loss orders will become ready fuel.
The higher it goes, the more intense the stepping on; such a big net of fish controlled by the house has no reason not to be collected.
#TRUMP
$TRUMP
👇Every major drop day has a list of leading decliners, and most people only look at the ranking by decline percentage. But the decline percentage itself is meaningless; what matters is whether the reasons for each name's drop are the same. This list happens to represent three unrelated paths.
$TRX ranks among the top mainstream coins in single-day pullback, but Tron’s stablecoin business and on-chain revenue have not changed at all. The drop is in leveraged positions, not fundamentals. Such a pullback comes fast and goes fast.
$MORPHO is different. The DeFi sector overall only dipped slightly, but its decline is more than five times that of the sector. It is the direct vehicle for this round of ETH deleveraging; collateral shrinks, lending volume shrinks, and protocol revenue shrinks accordingly.
$DOT is the third type, with no negative news—purely no one stepping in to buy. It has long been in a liquidity vacuum, so any sell order can create a deep pit.
Among the leading decliners, only MORPHO’s drop is worth tracking; the other two are noise. $XRP XRP has nearly $80 million worth of orders placed just below the 1.25 level; as soon as it dips below, they get instantly absorbed.
The overall market is sluggish; even if it can't break the previous low, the $XRP /BTC rate is still outperforming Bitcoin, clearly showing that major players are quietly holding the line.
Below are hands holding the defense with bags, the bulls are very strong this round.
#XRP
$XRP
👇Leverage is still in play, but trading volume suddenly cools down. OKX 06:18 (UTC) snapshot shows $AKE perpetual contract at 0.00613 USDT, down 37.70% in 24 hours, ranging between 0.00585—0.00992 USDT; the trading volume for the past full 24 hours is approximately 74.6343 million USDT.
In the most recent full 4 hours, it dropped another 25.06%, with trading volume increasing by 444.31% compared to the previous 4 hours; however, in the latest full 1 hour, it fell 6.51% while trading volume decreased by 66.82% sequentially. Current open interest (OI) is about 645 million AKE, equivalent to approximately 3.9447 million USD, with a funding rate around -0.3131%. The volume-expanded decline followed by shrinking trading volume indicates volatility has not yet stabilized; OI cannot identify net long or short positions, and a deeply negative funding rate does not necessarily signal a rebound.
OKX does not have AKE spot trading, lacking spot cross-confirmation. Next, consider 0.00614 and 0.00689 USDT as two confirmation boundaries: if the former is broken while OI remains high, the risk still leans downward; if the latter is reclaimed with a full-hour close, accompanied by rising volume and OI ceasing to expand, it would indicate selling pressure is beginning to ease.
* NFA, DYOROn Friday, the $BTC spot ETF saw an outflow of $643 million in a single day, the largest since June 25. The number itself isn't surprising; what's surprising is the day it happened — the first trading day after Binance was hacked.
Let's put the data back into context. $643 million is a single-day figure, with June 25 as a reference point. But it's "one day," not "one week." A single-day outflow amplifies sentiment, not trend. What really matters is whether it continues into early next week: if it doesn't, it's a one-off event; if it does, it means funds are changing direction.
Now, let's look at the mechanism. ETF outflows aren't retail investors hitting the sell button; they involve share redemptions: institutions submit redemptions, the fund sells the corresponding spot assets to market makers, who then dump them back into the market. This process is slow, has thresholds, and is constrained by business days, so this volume represents allocation decisions, not panic selling.
The timing makes it more significant. The security incident hit "custody trust," and the ETF outflow hit "position size." Two events collided on the same day, effectively asking the market two questions simultaneously: where do you keep your coins, and do you still want this much? Under this pressure, $ETH and $SOL have no independent narrative and can only contract along with risk appetite.
Don't treat this day as a turning point, nor as noise. It's more like the first reading of a stress test. Next, we need to distinguish whether funds are "relocating" or "exiting" — which look almost identical on the surface but have completely opposite implications.
This is the most worthwhile area to focus on right now. The current trend of ZEC is actually quite interesting. Unlike BTC, which surged rapidly upwards, it is slowly consolidating at a relatively low range, as if patiently accumulating energy. From the candlestick chart, although there is some pressure from moving averages above, the support below is solid, and the price volatility is narrowing, which is usually the calm before a breakout. The MACD indicator is entangled near the zero line, indicating a balance of power between bulls and bears. The main force may be quietly accumulating, waiting for the right moment to make a move.
In the face of this "grinding" market, we must not be impatient to chase highs or sell lows. I think the best strategy is to be a patient observer, waiting for it to break through key resistance levels or to pull back to strong support without breaking before taking action. If it can break through the upper pressure line with volume, that is a very clear entry signal; if it continues to pull back, as long as it does not break the previous low, we can build positions in batches at low levels, which makes the cost safer and the mindset more peaceful.
If you really find a suitable entry point, remember to always set a stop loss. Protecting our principal is the top priority. We can set the target at the next obvious resistance level or estimate a reasonable profit space based on wave theory. This low-level positioning strategy may require a bit more patience, but once the market starts, the risk-reward ratio is often very attractive. I hope everyone can stay calm and steadily seize this potential upward opportunity to get richer together! ✨$ZEC $BTC $ETH Abandon illusions! Above $ZEC is all a "Wall of Sighs"; whoever tries to bottom-fish will just be the bag holder!
Brothers, don’t think the market has bottomed just because the price twitches a bit. ZEC’s current movement is purely the main force "reversing to pick up people," tricking stubborn bulls to get on board.
Look at the current market: price around 1267, I placed a short at the high of 1273.38 and have already secured a steady 1.43% profit. Although the gain isn’t huge, I’m holding this trend very firmly.
Why? Just open your eyes and look at the order book depth above: from 1267.30 to 1267.44, there’s a dense wall of sell orders, with the largest single order pressing nearly 10 coins. As soon as bulls dare to poke their heads up, they get smashed instantly by large orders. Meanwhile, the buy side below is sparse and can’t absorb this continuous selling pressure.
From the candlestick trend, this is a classic "stair-step decline," with each high lower than the last, the moving averages tightly pressing down, and every slight rebound is a volume-less bull trap—a typical downtrend continuation pattern.
So, don’t catch a falling knife. We hold our shorts firmly this round; until the trend reverses, any pullback is just an opportunity for us to enter! $BTC $ETH #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ Everyone thought stolen funds couldn't be recovered? This time, the FBI's announcement might have been misread. Does anyone really think this $600 million is just "another hacking incident"? My first reaction to this news wasn't panic, but rather something subtle. On October 31, the FBI publicly confirmed that over $600 million stolen on Binance points to North Korea's TraderTraitor group—the same gang that took $1.5 billion from Bybit last year—and explicitly called on THORChain nodes, DeFi protocols, and exchanges to block all hacker addresses. The timing is crucial—when the news broke, the market didn't experience a stampede sell-off; BTC and ETH reacted relatively calmly, and altcoins were even quieter. What does this indicate? It means the "North Korean hacker" narrative has been traded too many times, and the emotional impact is diminishing. But I don't quite agree with simply categorizing this as "bad news fully priced in." From the perspective of capital preference, the real point to watch is another layer: when law enforcement starts publicly naming cross-chain nodes and DeFi frontends, the way risk appetite is priced quietly changes. Previously, it was assumed stolen funds would be laundered through mixers and cross-chain transfers with low chances of recovery, so the market treated it as a sunk cost; now, the FBI is placing interception responsibility on infrastructure like THORChain, effectively injecting "compliance friction" into what was originally a neutral cross-chain narrative. For BTC, this slightly enhances its safe-haven attribute; for ETH and the DeFi sector, the short-term effect is emotional suppression, especially for those relying on anonymous flows More important than the election to watch is this week's unlock schedule!
During election week, everyone's eyes are on the ballot box, but I'm focused on another chart. From November 2 to 8, a total of about $275 million worth of 12 tokens will be unlocked, all hitting the market right after a heavy blow this week.
The largest amount is BTW, unlocking about $114 million this afternoon; the most severe ratio is MMT, unlocking about 252 million tokens on November 4, equivalent to 294.38% of its current circulating supply, with chips nearly quadrupling overnight; KITE will unlock about $75.6 million tomorrow, accounting for 17.42% of its circulating supply.
The rest: ENA has two batches totaling about $25.4 million this week, AVAX's weekend batch accounts for only 0.3% of circulating supply, negligible. This is just the first week of November; a larger one-year unlock is queued for the end of the month.
Also to clarify: unlocking does not mean immediate dumping; the portion allocated to the ecosystem is usually spent gradually; the real focus is on the shares allocated to the team and early investors.
My view: when looking at unlocks, don't look at the amount first, look at the ratio. A large amount just means a loud noise, a large ratio means a heavy supply. Plus, the unlock recipients—the portion given to the team and early investors—have costs only a fraction of the current price, so cashing out doesn't need a reason.
This week, for these tokens, first check the unlock time and ratio before deciding whether to act.
$MMT $KITE $ENA #TokenUnlock The moment the sternum was split down the middle, what I saw was not a healthy heart, but a pump pushed to its limit by positive inotropic drugs—the cardiac output was dazzlingly high, but the myocardium's own contractile reserve had never been stress-tested.
Last season's revenue rose 93% year-over-year, with the US commercial side soaring nearly 1.5 times, followed by an upward revision of the full-year guidance. On the monitor, this is a beautiful curve: fast heart rate, large stroke volume, low peripheral vascular resistance, and auscultation full of murmurs. But high-powered circulation never equals myocardial health. We must distinguish whether this is truly enhanced contractility or the drugs propping you up—one-off orders, policy-driven procurement, and emotionally driven pricing all count as exogenous adrenaline. The real stress test is the moment the drugs are withdrawn.
What I want to see is the angiogram, not the pretty waveform on the ECG. Is perfusion uniform in the order book? Have major clients renewed enough to form collateral circulation? Gross margin is myocardial perfusion pressure—when it drops, the first to die are the most distal capillaries. If only one of the two coronary arteries supplying the government and commercial sides is perfusing, and the other is chronically stenosed, this heart cannot endure a long run. Even worse is an anastomotic leak: revenue looks intact on stage, but the true story is in the postoperative drainage bag.
Valuation is preload. The fuller it is, the closer you get to the descending limb of that curve—adding one more drop of volume actually reduces the blood ejected. Interest rate is afterload; when afterload rises, wedge pressure follows, and pulmonary edema is just a step away. The current pricing discounts the ideal postoperative recovery curve prematurely onto today's monitor. The thing I dread most during surgery is masking an anastomotic leak by increasing vasopressors—covering the gap with narrative will come back to haunt you on discharge day.
This earnings report, I only wait for one number: stroke volume. Not how fast it beats, but how much it truly pumps out each contraction—whether order conversion rate, retention structure, and free cash flow can align in phase. Troponin doesn't lie: if any one of these falls outside the reference range, the so-called high growth signals myocardial ischemia, not an athlete's sinus bradycardia. In the 24 hours post-op, I don't listen to how loud the monitor alarms are, only the color of the drainage and urine output—book profit is blood pressure, cash flow is urine output.
If this time there is only heart rate without stroke volume, it's not sinus tachycardia in recovery, but the last phase of compensation before decompensation. #palantirq3valuationFat test, the Kanye-associated address that keeps going long on ETH is suspected of increasing its position. After the Binance hack news was disclosed on October 30, this address sold off 1,390 ETH in batches to reduce liquidation risk, at an average price of about $2,275.6, worth approximately $3.163 million, with a loss of about $317,000. After withdrawals were reopened, this address withdrew another 2,074 ETH from Binance, worth about $4.7 million..#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 $BTC $ETH THORChain传出暂停部分兑换，黑客资金转移被拖慢。这个技术故障，会成为BTC事件风险降温的转折点吗？ 一、新闻。据公开报道，THORChain因区块重组问题暂停部分兑换服务，市场认为这可能减缓币安黑客资金的转移速度。与此同时，币安恢复提款后净流出规模升至约58亿美元。BTC报78,355.7美元，24小时涨0.48%、近一周仍跌2.58%，20日低点为76,265.2美元。 二、资金影响。BTC ETF最新单日净流入3,470万美元，5日净流入4.138亿美元，10日净流入1.769亿美元。美元指数报101.92、日内涨0.04%，黄金涨0.42%，恐惧贪婪指数回升到37。资金并没有全面逃离，但ETF最新申购力度已经明显减弱。 三、BTC含义。阻断兑换渠道只能延缓资金转移，不能自动解决问题；真正的利好是更多资产被追踪、冻结或追回。若链上追偿持续推进，交易所信用风险会下降；若攻击者找到替代通道，事件溢价仍可能重新上升。BTC反弹目前仍是风险缓和的定价。 四、观察指标。我接下来盯四个指标：一是THORChain暂停是否影响其他跨链流动性；二是黑客地址是否出现新的转移路径；三是币安净流#Palantir Earnings Preview: Can High Growth Support a High Valuation OKXOrbitTopics
Brushing off the century-old dust settled on parchment, the current uproar around $NVDA is, under my trowel and brush, nothing more than a nineteenth-century pottery shard unearthed anew.
As I sit before a desk cluttered with archives from a bygone era, watching the frenzy chasing the computing power overlord today, the atmosphere hits me like the stratigraphic layers of the 1840s British "Railway Mania." Back then, gentlemen and commoners alike scrambled to sell their belongings to subscribe to every railway share, even those existing only on blueprints; today, the fervent crowd not only rushes to buy this new era's casting shovel but also, through the geometric amplification of decentralized media, transforms an ordinary financial report into a "Delphic oracle" deciding the fate of the entire market's bull and bear cycles.
Stratigraphy of history never lies; the composition of frenzy deposits has remained unchanged for centuries. In 1845, the British Parliament approved over two thousand miles of railway lines, and newspapers repeatedly declared the end of the carriage era, promising eternal prosperity through rails; yet when the crisis hit in 1847, all that remained on the surface were equity certificates that had plummeted 85%, alongside mountains of abandoned railbeds.
I believe the current market is precisely replicating this geological sedimentation process. The public no longer scrutinizes the underlying real computing power depreciation rates or terminal cash flows; they only need a totem, a golden idol sustaining the entire on-chain liquidity mirage.
From the bubble specimens unearthed over time, when a shovel seller's quarterly profit is treated as the Holy Grail of human technological civilization, even endowed by derivatives markets with divine authority to determine global asset liquidity, it often means the cultural layer's prosperity has reached the mechanical structure's limit. Stress in the strata is rising sharply; at the slightest disturbance, faults will instantly rupture.
Personally, I maintain absolute cold-bloodedness in my strategy, adhering strictly to discipline and risk limits during field excavations. I would never buy those clay tablets destined to weather away at historical peak prices during the temple's most flourishing incense-burning and the priests' drum-beating oracle proclamations.
There is nothing new under the sun; the only lesson humanity has learned from history is that it has never truly learned any lesson.
Fervent believers think they are witnessing the birth of a miracle, but in my eyes, they are merely using their excited flesh and blood to cast a doomed materialistic relic for the archaeologists of the next era.🏛️📜#Mục tiêu huy động vốn của OpenAI giảm, rủi ro tín dụng của Anthropic được quan tâm #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？
The market has already priced in a "December rate hike," reflecting a crowded long dollar / short growth expectation.
- If the nonfarm payrolls slightly exceed expectations: it will likely be a "buy the rumor, sell the fact" scenario, with the positive outlook realized.
- If the nonfarm payrolls significantly beat expectations: it will trigger a new round of trend-driven hawkish repricing.
- If the nonfarm payrolls weaken significantly: it will represent a strong negative surprise, causing a sell-off in dollar longs and US Treasury shorts.
A common trading pitfall: don’t focus only on new jobs added; the month-over-month wage growth is a hidden trigger. Even if new jobs are average, a jump in hourly wages will still be interpreted by the market as a wage inflation risk, raising rate hike expectations.
Brief conclusion
The nonfarm payrolls won’t directly lock in the outcome but will significantly shift the odds:
- ✅ Strong nonfarm + wage rebound → December rate hike almost certain
- ✅ Weak nonfarm, rising unemployment, wage decline → rate hike expectations cool off, likely no move
- ✅ Neutral nonfarm → suspense remains for CPI
The Fed’s current stance: it prefers to keep the option of "one more hike" open and won’t easily rule it out.
Risk warning
Macro expectations change rapidly; interest rate futures probabilities only reflect current market pricing and do not constitute any trading advice; volatility is extremely high around data releases, and leveraged positions are prone to liquidation.#PalantirQ3Valuation Brothers, today let's focus on the long and short game situation of these three coins 👇
$CT: The rebound looks more like a bull trap
CT has already broken the key level, long positions are floating with losses close to 1.55 million USD, and there is a large amount of historical trapped positions. The cost to pull the price up again is not low.
At present, the rebound looks more like a bull trap, so blind bottom-fishing is not recommended.
$TRUTH: Small-cap coin, be cautious with shorting
Currently, long positions have floating profits, short positions have floating losses of about 158,000 USD, and overall fuel is not sufficient.
But TRUTH has a relatively small market cap, making it easier to pump the price. The possibility of further rallies to attract shorts to enter cannot be ruled out, so be cautious with shorting for now.
$TRUMP: Bears hold the advantage
Short positions have profits of about 1.55 million USD, long positions have floating losses of about 350,000 USD, and trapped positions are relatively few.
You can consider lightly buying at appropriate low points, but be sure to set stop losses. Heavy positions for speculation are not recommended.
Summary:
CT is not suitable for blind bottom-fishing, be careful of shorts getting squeezed on TRUTH, and TRUMP can cautiously look for low entry opportunities.
Altcoins are really tough to trade both long and short right now; controlling position size is more important than anything else Predicting whether Bitcoin can break through, when I hear "everyone thinks it will," I first want to ask: Are we all looking at the same screenshot? In regular trading, when many people chase to buy, it can indeed push the price; however, popular odds in prediction markets don't necessarily cause the event to happen. I use odds as a reference, but when several groups keep circulating the same piece of news, that hardly counts as cross-validation. If you remove those posts that cite each other, who is left with new evidence?Changing the trading target doesn't necessarily mean changing the risk. When I read this news, what popped into my mind wasn't "recovered," but rather: after exiting a trade, is the risk actually removed, or has it just been concentrated somewhere else?
According to Odaily citing HyperBot data, Brother Maji Huang Licheng has fully closed his previous long position of 11,000 HYPE tokens with 10x leverage, incurring a loss of about $31,600; he then continuously increased his long position on Ethereum with 25x leverage, raising the position to 5,200 ETH. Currently, the overall position has slightly turned profitable, with an unrealized gain of $158,000 and a return on investment of 32.56%.
My judgment is that this looks more like a re-concentration of risk rather than diversification. Leaving HYPE and increasing ETH means the target changed, but the direction remains long; from these two positions, there is no indication of offsetting volatility by taking opposite directions.
Another aspect is leverage. At 25x leverage, returns are amplified, but price movements against the position will erode margin faster. The current unrealized gain reflects the present state but cannot protect the position against the next volatility. When I look at such quick updates, I tend to put "how much was earned" aside and focus more on the risk exposure.
If you could only add one piece of data to this whale activity update, would you prefer to see the liquidation price, margin size, or other holdings? Which one would most change your judgment? Based on the USD spot daily chart (UTC settlement), $BTC opened October at $83,556 and closed at $77,424, down 7.34%. Last October, it fell 3.96%. For two consecutive years, "Uptober" hasn't come. A 7.34% drop itself isn't large. In June this year, under the same criteria, $BTC fell 20.46% in a single month. What makes this time uncomfortable is not the magnitude, but the timing: many people are used to expecting a rise in October. This month was not a continuous decline. On October 2, the intraday high reached $87,249, the highest point of the month. For more than three weeks afterward, the daily closing price hovered above $80,000. The real wound came at the end of the month: on October 29, it dropped 4.27% in one day, and the next day the intraday low touched $76,141, the lowest of the month. The background is also not easy. In the early morning of October 29 Beijing time, the Federal Reserve kept interest rates at 3.75% to 4%, with a vote of 10 to 2; the two dissenting votes advocated raising rates by another 25 basis points. The statement said inflation is "still elevated." On the previous trading day, the US 10-year Treasury yield closed at 5.05%. With money this expensive, risk assets must first answer one question: why are they worth holding? What should be watched more is $ETH. In the same month, it fell from $2,684 to $2,253, a drop of 16.07%, nearly 9 percentage points deeper than $BTC $INTC Although I also bought a bit of Intel, my view is more extreme because I think this AI wave is about to collapse. The reason is simple: if you throw a few stones into a river, you can see the ripples, right? These leading big tech companies have poured in hundreds of billions of dollars, and then you tell me they produced a short drama called Red Fruit. Who can hold on to that?#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？
Tomorrow is the official voting day for the U.S. midterm elections, with all 435 House seats up for grabs and 35 Senate seats contested. Currently, the Republicans control the Senate 53 to 47, and their advantage in the House is very slim.
There are three key points to watch:
Congressional control
Cost of living, inflation, and immigration are the main issues in this election. A Pew survey in October showed that 55% of American adults believe the Democrats will take the House, but the Senate is expected to be roughly split 50-50.
If a divided Congress emerges, Trump's future tax cuts, budget, and immigration policies may face more resistance, and investigations and hearings will increase.
Political influence of the crypto industry
Statistics show that corporate political spending in this election reached $737.3 million, with the crypto industry accounting for about $233 million. Crypto companies are clearly not just seeking short-term policy benefits but are also positioning themselves for future influence in Congress.
Iran situation and energy markets
Reports indicate that the U.S. and Israeli militaries have prepared plans to resume strikes on Iran, possibly after the election. However, the White House has clearly stated there will be no attacks on Iran before November 3, and subsequent actions remain uncertain.
My view is that the impact of this election will not be limited to U.S. politics. If control of Congress changes, fiscal policy, crypto regulation, and foreign policy could all be readjusted.
For U.S. stocks, in the short term, policy uncertainty should be monitored, while in the medium term, attention should be paid to whether Congress can pass new fiscal and industrial policies. The Iran situation is an additional variable that requires caution regarding oil prices and inflation. The deadline for this round of virtual asset service provider (VASP) license applications in Brazil was October 30. The result was quite different from market expectations: previously, the industry estimated that 150 to 200 institutions would submit applications, but in reality, only about 40 formally submitted. Let's clarify the difference between this "40" and other numbers you might see. You may see reports saying "68" or even "63," which is not contradictory, just different statistical criteria. The 40 refers to those who formally submitted complete applications. The 68 is the total number of institutions "in the process" tracked by financial infrastructure company Cainvest. This includes not only formal applicants but also banks that already hold central bank licenses and have submitted regulatory notifications (which may follow a simplified process), as well as cases where documents are related but the companies themselves have not publicly confirmed. So, 40 have submitted, 68 are counted in this pool. According to the rules, institutions that have submitted applications can continue to operate legally during the central bank's review. Those who have not submitted must exit the Brazilian market within 30 days. Another key date: from November 6, Brazilian banks and payment institutions will no longer be able to conduct business with unauthorized virtual asset service providers. The expectation was one to two hundred applicants, but only forty submitted, which is quite a realistic gap. Compliance costs and thresholds are there, and many small and medium institutions may have given up after some consideration. When banks cut off connections with unlicensed institutions on November 6, the market landscape in Brazil will further concentrate on compliant players who have obtained licenses. Currently, everyone is waiting for the central bank's review results.#Palantir Financial Report Review: Can High Growth Support a High Valuation The midterm elections are approaching. Will the mainstream continue to rise or experience a waterfall decline?
With the midterm elections imminent, the Democrats are highly likely to take the House of Representatives. Fiscal policy, tariffs, and AI regulation are the core points of contention.
The election results will impact the future of U.S. crypto regulatory policies, fiscal policy, and market confidence.
If policy expectations lean positive, $BTC $ETH will see a strong rebound. If the market worries about policy uncertainty, funds will seek safety, causing the mainstream to experience a waterfall drop!
Sudden surges and dumps are likely around the election period, so don’t rush to take a position in the short term!
$SNDK #非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？
#加密行业协同守护资产安全 #Palantir Financial Report Preview: Can High Growth Support a High Valuation In October 2008, a person using the pseudonym "Satoshi Nakamoto" published the Bitcoin whitepaper. On January 3, 2009, the Bitcoin genesis block was mined, marking the official birth of cryptocurrency. Its original intention was a response to the fragile banking system at the time.
NFT: Sprouted in 2014, exploded in 2021
The concept of NFT first appeared in 2014, initially just a niche experiment within the tech community. In 2017, projects like CryptoPunks and CryptoKitties began bringing it into the public eye. But its true peak in popularity was from 2021 to 2022, with Beeple’s record-breaking auction and the viral success of the "Bored Ape" series making NFT a global cultural phenomenon.
The demise of altcoins: a structural "liquidation"
You feel that many previously famous altcoins are disappearing, and this is not an illusion. Data shows that more than half of the tokens created since mid-2021 have "died," ceasing active trading. In 2025 alone, about 11.6 million tokens went to zero, accounting for 86.3% of all failures in the past five years. Historically, 71.9% of projects that once entered the top 100 by market cap have actually died.
The pattern of demise can be summarized into several clear modes:
Distorted financing models: The ICO (Initial Coin Offering) bubble of 2017-2018 spawned many speculative projects, later cracked down by regulators. After founders turned to venture capital (VC), the 2021-2022 VC bubble spawned a batch of "overvalued, low-quality" projects. When the market cooled and VCs faced exit pressure, these tokens lacking real support were the first to fall.
Narrative before product: Many projects painted grand narratives like Web3 and GameFi before the technology was mature. When users repeatedly found promises unfulfilled and trust was exhausted, "no newcomers came in," and projects lost their foundational value.
Backlash of "open access": Extremely low token issuance thresholds led to a flood of speculative "meme coins" and experimental projects with almost no R&D support, which often disappeared after just a few transactions.
Therefore, the demise of altcoins is not accidental but a structural "liquidation" process driven by a financing bubble, narrative exhaustion, and low entry barriers.
The "US-led" dominant digital currencies
The so-called "US-led" digital currencies are not an official classification but refer to projects issued or led by companies registered and operating in the United States. At the policy level (such as proposals suggesting capital gains tax exemption for "US-made" cryptocurrencies), this has strategic significance.
Some projects with important market positions under this framework include:
XRP (Ripple): Led by the US company Ripple Labs, focusing on cross-border payments.
Solana (SOL): Founded by the US company Solana Labs, representing high-performance public blockchains.
USD Coin (USDC): A compliant stablecoin jointly issued by US companies Circle and Coinbase.
Avalanche (AVAX), Stellar (XLM), Chainlink (LINK), and others are also commonly included as active projects in this category.
Bitcoin and Ethereum, as decentralized networks, have core developers and ecosystems closely linked to the US but are generally not simply classified as "US-led projects."
💔 The fading narrative of "decentralization"
You keenly sense that the term "decentralization" is rarely seriously discussed anymore, and this observation is accurate. Its fading stems from the huge gap between ideals and structural realities.
A key fact is: the whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto never actually uses the word "decentralization." It repeatedly emphasizes "Distributed," aiming to "remove the need for a trusted third party."
However, the operational reality shows a high degree of structural concentration:
Infrastructure layer: Bitcoin mining hash power has long been controlled 60-70% by the top few mining pools.
Trading and custody layer: The vast majority of users’ asset flows still go through centralized exchanges (CEX).
Governance layer: Many DeFi protocols appear as DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) on the surface, but upgrade rights and pause rights are often held by core teams or multisig wallets.
Power transfer rather than dissipation: Power has shifted from banks and governments to VCs, foundations, mining pools, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers, reconcentrating in new places.
The market ultimately votes with its feet: most people choose a more centralized but more convenient path. Decentralization has shifted from a core organizational principle to more of a marketing term rather than the true operational axis.
🤫 Binance hack "silence": when a crisis no longer spreads
You noticed that the Binance hack (involving about $6.3 billion) was met with "no noise" in public opinion, which precisely reveals the current structural characteristics of the industry. The market reaction was calm because the crisis was structurally "isolated":
Loss fully absorbed: Binance used over $6.34 billion of its own funds to cover 100% of the loss, with user assets unaffected.
Selling pressure is "two-way": The stolen funds were from hot wallets, not cold wallet main storage. Meanwhile, Binance bought large amounts of scarce tokens on the market to replenish reserves, creating strong buy pressure that hedged potential hacker sell-offs.
Lack of panic transmission chain: Unlike the panic of "exchange collapse" during the FTX crash, withdrawal functions quickly resumed this time, and a large portion of stolen assets were frozen, cutting off the "Binance collapse → market panic" transmission chain.
When a leading player in an industry has the ability and willingness to internalize systemic risk with its own capital, a crisis that should be "historic" is downgraded in public perception to an operational event that needs to be "handled," rather than an industry faith crisis that needs to be "discussed." Is this good or bad news?870,000 living people's resumes were sold overseas, exchanging for 7.46 million — the settlement method was virtual currency.
In the first case, Wang and 10 others resold citizens' personal information, paying fees in virtual currency, involving over 1.98 million yuan. The second case was even more severe: Lin Feng and 20 others illegally obtained and sold over 870,000 job applicants' information overseas, with illegal gains also settled in virtual currency, involving over 7.46 million yuan.
870,000 entries represent the names, phone numbers, and work experience of 870,000 living people. Sold overseas, exchanged for 7.46 million.
Why does this industry love using stablecoins? Cross-border, instant, no intermediary banks, almost zero friction. $USDT transfers are so cheap they can be used like cash, which is exactly why it was chosen. But "no intermediary banks" does not mean "no chain" — every on-chain transfer's address, time, and amount are permanently public; judicial evidence collection seeks relationship graphs, not isolated points.
My judgment: law enforcement focus is shifting from "arresting people" to "cutting off settlements." The real risk is not in large amounts but in those "helping friends transfer a bit" small orders, which eventually all connect to the same graph.
Therefore, wallets should be layered: large cold storage, daily small amounts, exchange deposits each separate, same for $BTC and $ETH. Not to hide, but to avoid joint liability.
A question remains: when the settlement method itself becomes the main evidence line, should the first upgrade be technology or risk awareness of "helping friends transfer a bit"?After lunch, I checked the ETF fund situation. Today, ETF net inflow: BTC took about 80%, ETH only a bit over 20%.
Does this mean no one wants ETH? No. ETH also had a net inflow of 29.39 million today, the positive number is real, just overshadowed by BTC's 105 million in scale.
The cumulative data shows the same pattern: BTC accumulated 58.5 billion, ETH accumulated 13.4 billion, still roughly an 80/20 split. This is not a coincidence but an old habit of the funds.
The market also matches this: BTC is consolidating around 78,184, ETH stands near 2,284, SOL is pressured below 94.4. Today, two positives and one negative, no clear one-sided move.
Positions are quieter: the three major mainstream coins all eased off within 0.2% in one hour. The total network position is 137.18 billion, up only 0.21%. Trading volume surged to 103.8 billion, up 48.97%, volume is entering but positions are not following.
Liquidations are not calm: 135 million in one day across the network, up 74.55%, with BTC and ETH accounting for more than half. Those chasing highs are paying their tuition first.
So my view is simple: the 80/20 split is not a conclusion but a division of labor. BTC takes the incremental inflow, ETH holds the base positions, and SOL needs to see if it can reclaim 94.4.
Tonight at 11 PM there is ISM manufacturing data expected between 54.5 and 54.7. Before the result, I won’t add positions, just maintain this ratio and wait for it to change.
Only when the ratio flips to 50/50 will it be a signal for ETH to take over. Until then, don’t cheer for it to surpass BTC.$BTC, $ETH Midterm elections are approaching, how to operate in the short term?
Tomorrow's US midterm elections are the biggest uncertainty bomb right now, directly determining the degree of crypto regulation looseness or strictness in the next two years. Everyone must be clear about this.
If the Democrats take control of Congress, crypto regulation will tighten, SEC investigations and restrictions will increase, the CLARITY Act will basically have no chance of advancing, which is a real negative for both Bitcoin and Ethereum; if the Republicans firmly control power, industry policy expectations will be relaxed, and funds will dare to go long.
The market has already started to play the expectations in advance. This morning's BTC and ETH rebound is essentially funds betting on the election result in advance, not a trend reversal. Historically, when such news is realized, good news leads to profit-taking and price drops, bad news accelerates the decline. Do not blindly chase highs and get trapped at the news peak.
Our direction is very clear: continue to short on rebounds. Short Bitcoin in the 78,500-79,000 range, enter Ethereum at 2,300-2,320.
Before the election results come out, keep positions light, do not go all in. Treat all rallies as bull traps, do not guess the result, just follow the market levels to execute the plan.
The next article by Beichen will explain why he is more optimistic about a Republican victory!
#美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ 2:30 PM, the most sleepy time. Just glanced at the market, almost made me laugh out loud. The main market is sleeping, but a few altcoins are performing a big revival. The main players' eating habits are really shameless. Don't get itchy just by looking at the red and green bars.
First, look at $HYPE, current price 86.4. This one is consolidating at a high level. The funniest thing is the 4-hour long-short ratio, which dropped sharply from 2.17 to 1.45 like a roller coaster. The price barely fell, but retail investors were scared and frantically cutting losses. However, looking closely, the funding rate occasionally turns negative, indicating the bulls lack confidence. Chasing here has a very low risk-reward ratio.
Next, look at $ZEC, current price 1266. The bears had a great time recently, but now the bulls are howling to bottom-fish again. The long-short ratio climbed hard from 0.48 back to 0.83. It's a typical fence-sitting market, with wicks going up and down washing out both sides. Both sides want to profit, but in the end, both often get slapped in the face.
The sneakiest is $UNI, current price 7.1. The 4-hour long-short ratio directly pulled up to 2.36. Above 7.4 is all previous trapped positions. Retail investors are still crazily adding positions below. Isn't this obviously a bull trap set by the main players? Once the main market shows a little resistance, the long positions will definitely be crushed like dry grass.
My view: The afternoon is just a low-volume oscillation, altcoins fighting their own battles, emotions extremely torn. Control your hands, don't be fooled by the main players' fake moves.
Among these three coins, who do you think will dive first to wash out positions? Whose positions are you holding now?
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ $BTC
5833 BTC. This afternoon, a listed company called Next Technology said it will handle this batch of coins, either selling them or using them as collateral. At the current price of 78163, that's about 456 million USD.
Last week, Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of 203 million, with Fidelity's FBTC alone withdrawing 166 million. This kind of selling pressure at the listed company level has been continuous for months.
But the market hasn't collapsed. BTC is now at 78163, up 0.35% in 24 hours, with a daily low of 77600, a perpetual funding rate of +0.0069%, open interest at 2.63 billion USD, and 33,700 BTC; the bulls haven't been scared off.
While coins are being sold, leverage hasn't given up. I've encountered this kind of stalemate a few times; the outcome is usually a sideways grind until one side can't take it anymore. My inclination is not to chase shorts or rush to buy at this level, but to let it choose its own direction.
#非农来袭，12月加息会否生变？ Is a 99.7% drop still not enough? CORE's “slow knife to cut losses”: Why it is said to be heading towards zero
As of November 2, CORE was priced at about $0.0136, down more than 99.7% from its all-time high, with a market cap of only about $13 to $14 million, having fallen into the small-cap high-risk zone.
It’s not without a narrative. CORE focuses on BTCFi, once attracting funds with “Bitcoin PoS layer + EVM compatibility + buyback and burn.” But the problem is: the narrative remains, but the funds have left.
The crash began in March 2026 when the ecosystem protocol Colend triggered a liquidation cascade, plunging over 50% in a single day. Since then, TVL has been sluggish, there have been no hit applications, tokens continue unlocking, and rebounds have repeatedly been crushed by sell pressure. More critically, in September it was revealed that validators received excess tokens, multiple exchanges suspended deposits and withdrawals, further damaging trust.
Currently, CORE’s liquidity is thin, and even a small sell-off can push it to new lows. It may not hit zero immediately, but it is already in a “semi-zombie” state.
Do the altcoins in your hands carry similar risks? Let’s discuss in the comments.$TRX hackers exchanged 638 million TRX directly before USDT was frozen.
These chips cannot be forcibly banned, effectively becoming a live bomb hanging over everyone's head. On-chain automated scripts are already splitting the involved funds layer by layer into multiple addresses, clearly intending to launder them out in batches on the secondary market.
The current market support is only at this level; once this batch starts rushing to sell, leveraged long positions chasing the highs will be liquidated in minutes.
#TRX
$TRX
👇#苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 Why are so many people optimistic that Apple's earnings report will exceed expectations? Last quarter's beat was already somewhat exhausted, barely maintaining growth beyond expectations thanks to tax refunds. This time it's clearly different:
First, costs have risen; the sharp increase in storage prices has driven up Apple's costs and reduced profit margins, and although the new generation 18 products have increased prices, they were only on sale for about 10 days within the reporting period.
Second, Apple itself forecasts a growth rate of 9-11%, which is somewhat below the market's 13% estimate, but I believe Apple's forecast is closer to reality.
Third, the truth is held by a few!When it comes to insider information from project teams in prediction markets, I usually start with a question mark. You can still discuss price trends in coin trading, but here you're betting on whether specific events will happen; even how an announcement is worded can affect the judgment. When the odds change, I can't tell if new information has come in or if the market is too thin and being pushed by capital. Doing business requires verifying the goods; in the crypto world, even the source of the information is skipped? When asked for the source, they say it's inconvenient to disclose, so I have to bear the cost of this information myself.Capital Flow: ETF's "Monthly Outflow" and Futures' "Hedging Pricing"
① ETF: Net outflow of 643 million in October
On October 30, the US spot Bitcoin ETF had a single-day net outflow of 233.7 million, with FBTC experiencing a cumulative inflow of 440.8 million. On a monthly scale, the ETF net outflow for October was approximately $515 million, marking the fifth negative monthly result since 2026.
The only marginal bright spot was on October 31, when panic selling was concentrated, the ETF had a single-day net inflow of $135 million, being "almost the only buyer" at that time. However, a single day's inflow was far from enough to offset the month's outflow.
② Futures Backwardation: An Overlooked "Hedging Signal"
Bitcoin futures contracts expiring on November 2 and 3 were priced below the spot market, creating a backwardation. This situation is uncommon in Bitcoin and usually occurs when more traders seek short-term hedging rather than expecting leveraged long positions. Combined with Deribit's overall flat futures curve and the absence of extra premiums on leveraged positions, the market currently lacks the intrinsic momentum to push prices upward through leveraged funds. $BTC $ETH $SOL #美国中期选举在即，哪些结果值得关注？ #Apple's new CEO receives the first report card for iPhone 18 1. Will AAPL beat expectations this quarter (after market close on November 2)?
Conclusion: There is a 60%–70% chance that revenue/EPS will slightly beat expectations, but the "beat magnitude" is limited; the real risk lies in the "next quarter guidance" and gross margin.
Consensus: Revenue about $113.4 billion, EPS about $1.99–2.00
Goldman Sachs estimate: Revenue $113.598 billion, EPS $2.01 (slightly above consensus)
Drivers: iPhone 18 Pro price increase + premiumization (revenue up about 15% YoY), services business up about 10% YoY
Headwinds: DRAM/NAND price increases, staggered release causing shipments down about 4% YoY, currency headwinds
Objective judgment (confidence ≈90%):
This quarter's financials: slight beat (EPS higher by $0.01–0.03)
Post-earnings stock price: not necessarily up—the market will focus on December quarter guidance and gross margin; if guidance is conservative, it’s easy to have "good results but valuation cut"
Current stock price around 344, PE 39x, already priced in the "AI + safe-haven asset" narrative, upside space eaten by high valuation
Trading perspective: Don’t treat "beat expectations" as an unconditional buy signal. Short term is more like a "expectation realization + guidance setting direction" game; high leverage directional bets have low cost-effectiveness.
Tag #苹果新CEO迎来iPhone18首份成绩单 $BTC 011.2 Bitcoin live trading chat｜Stuck at the 78,000 level, bulls and bears are about to choose a direction
Just finished checking the market, today BTC has been stuck around $78,300 for almost a whole day, with a slight 0.8% rise in 24 hours, and the fluctuation range is less than $1,000. The support at 77,500 and resistance at 78,450 are very close, giving a strong sense of an extreme low-volume battle before the storm.
Here are a few of today's most direct impressions:
1. Volume suddenly exploded: Today's trading volume surged to 4.6 times the 30-day average. In a usually sluggish market, such a large volume spike indicates that whether it breaks above 80,000 or drops below 77,000, the upcoming trend will be very decisive and straightforward, without dragging on.
2. Sentiment is quietly warming up: The Fear and Greed Index was below 30 yesterday and climbed to 34 today. Although still in the "fear zone," it’s much more relaxed than the previous extreme pessimism. The panic selling triggered by the Binance hack has basically been absorbed.
3. The macro environment is a bit conflicted: On one hand, PCE data is cooling down, and the Fed’s rate hike probability has been cut in half, providing bottom support for risk assets; on the other hand, the Nasdaq crashed 2.86% yesterday, and the 10-year US Treasury yield remains high at 4.98%. The high interest rate environment hasn’t eased, so Bitcoin has no incremental funds to push it up in one go.$LINK continues to underperform around $11.3, while Chainlink just announced a partnership with HKGX to connect smart contracts to physical gold trading, advancing 24/7 pricing, institutional management, and compliance integration. Infrastructure is accelerating deployment, but the token price remains stagnant — this mismatch of "narrative moving forward, funds lagging behind" is the most important signal to watch right now. First, let's look at the market anchors. $BTC is around $77,850, fluctuating narrowly within 24 hours, having previously lost and then reclaimed the $78,000 level; whether it can hold above this is the short-term focus. $ETH is about $2,260, showing relatively steady performance with support above $2,250, but lacking momentum for an upward breakout. Both are in a state of "holding ground but unable to advance," indicating the market is not short on positions but lacks confirmation of new capital inflows. The real standout is $LINK. Among the three, it is under the most pressure; if it breaks below $11.0 effectively, short-term pressure will intensify. The key here is not whether the partnership news is good or bad, but a colder issue: institutional-grade infrastructure for RWA and oracle sectors is already ahead, yet funds have not caught up. Rapid infrastructure rollout does not mean holders will immediately see capital return — this is the timing gap the market is most likely to underestimate currently. My judgment is: the pricing method for this RWA narrative is shifting from "listening to stories" to "watching cash flow." Partnership announcements can only sustain sentiment; what truly confirms the bullish logic is on-chain usage and actual settlement demand after institutional onboarding.