Orbit Post Sitemap
$LLY, does the head-to-head data of retatrutide from yesterday suffice to change the competitive landscape? The company claims that in trials, its weight loss effect is twice that of the highest approved dose of Ozempic, and there is a Q3 earnings call today. Clinical results can enhance pipeline expectations, but safety, complete endpoints, and capacity still determine commercial conversion. If detailed data are robust and supply expansion is realized, the outlook will be more positive; if tolerance or production constraints emerge, I will lower peak expectations. 【BTC PA｜4H/1H】
Structure: 4H = RANGE, 1H used for support, resistance, and confirmation.
Support: 79,506.00–79,906.69 USDT.
Resistance: 80,330.33–80,527.02 USDT.
Time: Beijing Time 2026-10-29 17:10 / UTC 2026-10-29 09:10.
Risk: Structure may fail; this article is for market research information only and does not provide buy or sell instructions.
$BTC $CRV
Stellar has existed since 2014, six years older than Curve. Today it connected with Curve—Curve’s first step into a non-EVM ecosystem, with Stellar mainnet going live. Meanwhile, CRV is now at 0.3268, down 3% in 24 hours.
Curve has deployed on many chains within EVM, such as Polygon, Arbitrum, and Base, all active, but this is the first time it touches a non-EVM chain. An old protocol with an old chain, and the market’s reaction is no reaction.
I just checked OKX: CRV perpetual 24-hour trading volume is $35.6 million, but open interest is only $7.31 million, with fees hovering around 1 basis point. If there really were funds betting on this news, open interest wouldn’t be this low.
To be blunt, what Curve lacks now isn’t another chain, but new money. The pools are still there, the moat is still there, but the stablecoin market has long been divided among everyone. Opening another chain just means another pool with no one putting money in.
The price has already cast its vote. The day this kind of first-time, milestone news no longer results in a bearish candle, that’s the day I’ll come back to look at it.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 What is the outcome for those who go against the downtrend of $RE?
I started indicating at the beginning of September that RE was the best short target. Compared to AAVE, it is overvalued by 20 times, with 40 million tokens unlocked for dumping, the US stock market ending a 4-year continuous rise, extremely overvalued, the market turning bearish, competing altcoins being issued, competing tokens issued on the US stock market. Compared to the US stock market, altcoins have no fixed asset collateral, no supervision by the securities regulatory commission, no dividends, no voting rights, completely worthless paper. All these unfavorable factors are maximized, yet some people still fail to recognize the situation and buy against the wind. By October 5th, it was even pushed up to a high of 0.55, but the market is very smart. After a month of pushing against the wind, it fell back to the original point in less than 3 days. This is the power of the trend.
It is still not too late to short RE now. The US stock market is about to be fully tokenized, and by then no one will buy altcoins anymore. RE still has 800 million tokens of dumping funds not unlocked. Anyone who wants to go against the trend will be mercilessly cut down by the market. The rise of RE from September to October is an example. Buying RE now is like the last eunuch entering the palace in the Qing Dynasty. $BTC If it rebounds to 81800–82000 and faces resistance, consider light short positions with a stop loss above 82500, targeting 80500–80000.
If a stabilization signal appears in the 79000–79500 range (volume contraction stopping the decline, volume expansion recovery), short-term rebound opportunities can be considered, but strict risk control is necessary.
It is not advisable to chase orders around the middle of the range (near 80200, i.e., the current price in the screenshot) as the risk-reward ratio is unfavorable. Waiting for the price to reach the edges of the range before acting is safer.
$ETH 2310 is the key observation line. If it breaks down with volume, do not bottom fish; the lower reference is 2256. If it is supported at this level and recovers above 2350, it can be seen as a short-term stabilization signal.
If it rebounds to 2380–2400 and faces resistance, consider setting up short positions with a stop loss above 2430, targeting 2320–2300.
Overall, ETH should be approached with a defensive mindset; do not easily define a rebound as a reversal before the daily close stabilizes above 2400.
Regarding position sizing and risk control, macro uncertainties have not yet been resolved (December rate hike expectations, PCE data, tech earnings). It is recommended to keep overall positions light, prioritize conditional orders over market orders, and enforce strict stop losses. Altcoins require position control during weak phases.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温
#谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期
#微软Q1营收增长，Azure增速至48%超预期 $SNDK
SanDisk is releasing its earnings after the US market closes tonight. If I had to pick one key number to watch, it’s not revenue, not EPS, but the guidance.
Remember the August 5th report? Last quarter revenue was 8.97 billion, adjusted EPS 39.25, both beating analyst expectations, yet the stock still dropped 7% after hours and fell more than 9% before the next day’s open. The drop wasn’t due to performance, but the next quarter’s guidance, which was 10.3 to 10.8 billion, slightly below what the market wanted.
For tonight, institutions expect revenue of 10.677 billion, and the company’s own guidance last quarter was 10.3 to 10.8 billion, so the expectation is right at the high end of the range. It’s like revealing the passing score before the exam; meeting it isn’t a surprise, missing it is a disaster.
I just pulled the OKX token at 1370, it’s been fluctuating between 1338 and 1421 in the last 24 hours, fees are close to zero, with a position of 89.3 million USD. The money betting on the earnings report basically hasn’t entered yet.
My view is cautious; this isn’t a simple long or short question, it’s a guessing game. The answer comes out at 4 a.m., and I’ll be watching the show from bed. Last quarter I watched it drop and didn’t dare to buy, missing out both ways, so at least this quarter I saved on fees.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #IntelQ3TerafabFoundry
#IntelQ3TerafabFoundry 🏭 Intel Q3 Oct 29 guide $15.8-16.8B midpoint $16.3B +19% YoY, consensus $16.5B +21%, non-GAAP EPS $0.38 vs $0.23 y/y, est $0.40. Options imply ±9.4% move $84.9-$102.6.
Q2: $16.1B +25% beat, Foundry $5.8B +31% YoY but $2.09B op loss, external only $293M. 18A high-vol Panther Lake HVM with High NA EUV.
Terafab: $16.8B phase-1 Musk Tesla/SpaceX near Houston, up to $119B total, TSMC talks risk Intel endorsement. YTD +158%. $BTC Our first mistake was probably calling the entire October Uptober in advance, haha.
After seeing the historical patterns so much, everyone started treating it like a calendar-based bullish signal. Before September was even over, the October charts were already moving, and profits were all planned out.
But as of October 25, BTC has dropped 4.2% this month, looking at a second consecutive red October. What’s even more painful is that the average October gain from 2020 to 2025 is still 18.1%.
I’m still quite optimistic about the market, but the calendar really can’t be taken as a guarantee of a rally. At this rate, I don’t even dare to ask what name everyone is preparing for November, lol.20261029
5. The script for Benjamin Cowen btc season 4 has already reached step 3
1. The script has a total of 9 steps, written in advance, like a weather forecast predicting you to take an umbrella
2. The first three steps have already come true, which are:
First, the price closes below 83,000
Second, first pump up to lure people in, then crash down
Third, the Federal Reserve meeting, no rate hike
3. For the remaining six steps, just follow the calendar:
Fourth, inflation data comes out, inflation will get worse
Then, oil prices surge to 120, interest rates continue to rise
Finally, US stocks fall, Bitcoin continues to slide before the end of the year
4. Every US midterm election, the fourth quarter historically always falls
5. Will the script fail?
If Bitcoin stands back above 83,000 and holds steady, the entire script is invalidated
6. Without a private key, your Bitcoin can still be stolen
1. No need to crack passwords or steal mnemonic phrases, the veteran Bitcoin wallet Electrum has already been compromised by someone
2. Specific operation process:
When you initiate a Bitcoin transfer, a malicious server will intercept it and not send it to the network, then give you a fake one. The fake transaction sends money to the hacker's address, with the last digits exactly matching what you entered, the last four characters match. Usually, we don't verify every character, just glance at it, thinking the address hasn't changed, then the transaction shows as stuck
At this point, you usually choose to manually increase the fee to speed it up, and when you do, the wallet resigns the transaction, but signs the hacker-modified one$GOOGL's earnings report triggered an immediate crash; friends looking to buy the dip should hold off!
Google's latest earnings data shows that the core cloud business growth fell short of market expectations, and AI-related revenue realization did not meet investors' imaginations. The previously high market valuation was fully bet on cloud business and AI growth, but with those expectations unmet, capital fled immediately. Coupled with the Fed's hawkish tone and the prospect of prolonged high interest rates, growth stock valuations will continue to be under pressure. These two negative factors combined caused this cliff-like drop.
Visibly on the chart, the high point was 364.5, followed by a steady weakening trend, hitting a low of 288.22 today, with the current price at 290.69. Don't be fooled by the lower shadow here; many retail investors think the price has bottomed and want to jump in to buy cheap, but this is just passive absorption after short-term panic selling, not a signal of a main force reversal. The negative sentiment from the earnings report hasn't been fully digested yet, and there are dense trapped positions above, so every rebound will see selling from those looking to exit.
The direction is firmly bearish; short in the 295-298 rebound range, with the first target at 285.
To put it plainly: this round of selling is all about the AI premium. The earnings report didn't deliver impressive results, the story can't support the high stock price, and the macro environment is weak. Don't stubbornly hold on thinking "it should rise after falling so much." Rebounds are opportunities to reduce positions and short; don't rush to catch a falling knife!
#谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 2 Federal Reserve hawkish signals! December rate hike probability soars, is $BTC in trouble this time?
The Federal Reserve maintained rates at 3.75%—4.00% with a 10 to 2 vote, but the real focus is not on holding rates steady, rather that two officials supported a 25 basis point hike.
The market currently estimates about a 78% chance of a rate hike in December. If this expectation continues to ferment, it is definitely not good news for BTC.
Why?
Because although $BTC has its own supply and demand logic, its short-term price is still influenced by USD liquidity, market risk appetite, and interest rate expectations.
The more hawkish the rate expectations, the more likely capital will reassess the valuation of risk assets. Those who originally expected rate cuts and planned to push BTC up with liquidity easing may have to recalculate their expectations.
But I also don’t think rate hike expectations necessarily mean $BTC must fall. The market trades on expectation gaps; if hawkish news has already been priced in, negative news might actually be absorbed later.
The real danger is believing in a rate cut bull market while completely ignoring changes in the macro environment.
If there really is a rate hike in December, do you think BTC will break support directly or absorb the negative news early and then rebound? #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 #谷歌Q3营收增长，净利润下滑、每股收益不及预期 #三星Q3营业利润创新高，净利润不及预期 I can't treat hoarding Bitcoin as just moving money to another place to save. When you save in a bank, you have a contract for maturity; with Bitcoin, no one promises redemption, and holding it for a long time won't automatically turn it into a deposit. When I see companies buying coins for the long term, I'm more concerned about how long their money can stay idle. If they still have to sell coins later to pay salaries or debts, then the so-called long term might also depend on cash flow. Every time I see a purchase announcement, I want to scroll down and check: when is the debt repayment scheduled?Galaxy Digital submitted an application to the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) on October 29, planning to establish a national trust bank in New York to provide fiduciary investment advisory and digital asset services, integrating its business fully under the federal regulatory framework.
The company holds an extensive list of licenses: currently possessing over 50 global licenses and regulatory approvals, involving the New York State Department of Financial Services, the UK Financial Conduct Authority, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. It is not an entity bypassing regulation but a licensed institution that has operated strictly under licenses.
The significance of the application lies in the change of hierarchy. State-level trust licenses have limited scope; once granted national trust bank status, custody, fiduciary, and asset management services can directly align with federal regulatory standards, making it easier for compliance departments of traditional institutions to approve. For main institutional assets like $BTC and $ETH, this adds another licensed channel available.
However, application does not equal approval. The approval process usually takes months or even quarters and may involve public comment periods and supplementary conditions. In the short term, it is more of a sentiment boost rather than immediately realizable incremental funds.
What is worth tracking is the subsequent pace: if this company obtains approval, other large crypto institutions are likely to follow, and national trust banks may shift from isolated cases to industry standards. That would be a more substantial step in the institutionalization narrative.
Focus on $BTC, $ETH, and the crypto custody sector.$SNDK jumped from 34%, 74% to 816%, 834%, a leap of this magnitude can only be event-driven.
SanDisk is a pure NAND/flash stock after the spin-off: Q4 NAND contract prices are expected to rise by 15% to 20%, with enterprise-grade SSDs leading the increase, and AI servers driving capacity demand. Previously, concerns were about future capacity expansion and capital expenditure sustainability; now the solid demand side has pulled the valuation back.
But event-driven moves have a pattern: after realization, implied volatility falls, and further gains need new reasons to continue. So the key question here is "where to take profits," not "how much more can it rise."
Follow-up strategy: gradually reduce positions at 1400, 1450, and 1500. Don’t mistake event-driven gains for trend momentum—the fundamental divergence (demand supported by AI vs. supply with future capacity) hasn’t disappeared, it’s just that demand’s voice is louder now. Whales are selling off their holdings right under our noses. On-chain data shows that a major player is continuously selling SOL on multiple mainstream centralized exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, OKX, and Kraken.
Quantity of assets released to the market:
- 1,020,000 $SOL
- $104.3 million
- Time since release: only 5 days
The wallet executes orders in a very systematic way, using the Fireblocks gateway. To avoid an immediate crash, it does not submit all orders at once but splits them into smaller orders, evenly executed over several hours:
- Small order amounts range from 1,000 to 10,000 SOL per order.
Each order’s value ranges from $100,000 to over $1 million.
Net selling pressure exceeding $100 million in a short time is the direct cause of SOL’s failed rebound. Those going long to support the price are essentially trying to catch a falling rock.
As whales actively disperse funds across various centralized exchanges, the risk of a price crash always exists. As long as these wallets keep flowing funds into exchanges, buying at low prices only provides liquidity for whales to profit.$BTC Review: Effective range 79,710-81,798; Short position reference: Enter at 80,142, Stop loss at 82,615, T1 79,710, T2 77,622; Basis: Break below 20-day moving average 80,567, RSI 43.1; Exit if breaking 81,798, don't go against the trend #币圈 #BTC$XAU 4034 is not a resistance line, it is a grinding band.
Key level 1H 1.0 = 4034.2-4036.5 (under testing)
Segment 0.382 retracement = 4035.9
The overlap forms a band of 4034-4036.5; entering short at the lower edge of the band is equivalent to standing in the middle of the stop-loss sweep pool, inevitably being ground up to the upper edge of the band.
18:56 4030.0 → 19:02 4034.）→ 19:06 4034.6 → 19:08 4034.7 → 19:10 4039.1 → 19:12 4035.8 → 19:18 4034.0 → 19:20 4035.9
Current status (19:20, current price 4035.4)
【Direction】② Premium short · main down wave: start point 4080.3 (04:00) | segment age 15.3h | moved 61.5 points | phase = end (already within range → only reduce, no add)
【Invalidation level】H1 close above 4049.7 → stop short | error recognition line 4064.6
【Relay band】Strong short at 4043.2 | last relay 4049.7 (7 factors ★★★★★★, SAR + integer + four key levels) | deep relay 4061.7
【Target】4020.0 (3h level) | today's low 4016.2/4016.5 | if broken, look at 4006.8-4010 (bottom candidate band)
【Volume】Volume ratio 0.54, active buy 0.48
【Position】45% middle band | resistance 4058.6 (magnet) / support 4016.5 | just waiting
Target first 4020, if 4016.5 breaks then look at 4006.8-4010. Segment has reached the end, the cost-effectiveness of chasing shorts is declining; the real position to heavily hold is on the rebound to 4043.2-4049.7# The Federal Reserve maintains interest rates unchanged, December rate hike divergence intensifies Gold at $4045, do you dare to bottom-fish?
From 5500 down to 4045, a 30% drop, everyone is cursing the myth of gold as a safe haven being shattered. But central banks have been secretly buying gold for 12 consecutive months — is the 4000 level a trap or a golden pit?
First, look at the surface: bad news bombardment, but 4000 hasn’t broken.
The Federal Reserve just held a meeting on October 28, keeping rates steady at 3.75%-4.00%, with a 10-2 vote; two members favored a rate hike, signaling a hawkish stance, and the probability of a December hike remains above 80%. The US dollar index is around 102, US Treasury yields remain high, Middle East tensions push oil prices up, and inflation concerns keep the Fed cautious. Logically, gold should collapse. But it’s stuck fluctuating between 4000-4060, daily lows at 4016-4025, highs at 4067-4080, and the 4045 you see is right in the middle. It can’t fall further, nor rise.
First point: The more hawkish the Fed, the harder it is for gold, but the market is almost no longer buying it.
High interest rates mean a high opportunity cost for holding gold — money in the bank yields 4%, gold yields nothing. This is the core reason gold fell from 5500 to 4000 over the past six months.
But notice one detail: despite all the bad news, 4000 hasn’t broken.
With the same hawkish signals, the first drop was 3%, the second 1%, and the third time the market just sideways. What’s called bad news dulling? This is it. Retail investors still curse “gold’s safe haven failure,” but central banks have been buying below 4000 for 12 consecutive months.
Second point: Gold is no longer a safe haven asset; it’s an "anti-Fed" asset now.
Many misunderstand: Middle East war means gold should rise? Not necessarily. Oil prices rise → inflation sticks more → Fed gets more hawkish → dollar strengthens → gold gets suppressed.
So if you buy gold now, you’re not betting on geopolitical conflict, you’re betting on when the Fed will give up.
Institutions have lowered their targets for the end of 2026 but generally expect a rebound above 4500 in 2027. In plain terms: short term still tough, mid-term bottom supported, long term central banks are propping it up.
Third point: Technically, 4000 is the dividing line between bulls and bears, no debate.
Daily/weekly: price below 20-day moving average (4130+) and 50-day moving average, MACD bearish momentum persists, RSI neutral to weak. After a big weekly drop, the rebound is weak, 4000 is both psychological and technical support, defended multiple times. If broken, look at 3975-3940.
4H/1H: oscillating between 4020-4060, average volume, typical pullback after rally. Structure still dominated by bears, rebounds are just corrections.
Bull vs bear, you decide:
On one side:
Central banks buying gold for many months, China’s central bank significantly increased holdings in September
4000 tested and held multiple times, long-term bottom supported
Geopolitical risks, de-dollarization, high debt environment persist
Institutions expect rebound to 4500+ in 2027
On the other side:
Fed hawkish, December hike probability 80%+
Strong dollar, high US Treasury yields, high opportunity cost for holding gold
Oil price pushing inflation up, suppressing gold
Technical bearish structure intact, 20/50-day moving averages pressure
Key levels
Resistance above: 4055-4070 → 4080-4100 (trendline + moving average pressure) → 4130+
Support below: 4020-4030 → 4000 (round number + bull-bear dividing line) → 3975-3940
Trading strategy
Short term (1-2 days):
Light short positions at 4055-4070 on rebound, stop loss above 4085-4100, target 4020→4000. On pullback to 4015-4025, if stabilization signals appear (hammer/engulfing), try light long positions, stop loss below 3995, target 4050-4070. Do not heavily buy above 4000, do not chase highs.
Mid term (1-2 weeks):
High sell and low buy within 4000-4100 range. If breaks below 3990 and holds, add shorts targeting 3900-3940. If breaks above 4100 and holds, switch to longs targeting 4130-4200. Single trade risk no more than 1-2% of account, medium-low leverage, watch perpetual funding rates.
Risk control focus:
Gold’s daily volatility often 50-70 dollars, strict stop loss required. Monitor dollar index, 10-year Treasury yields, oil prices. Avoid all-in, enter and exit in batches. Long-term bulls wait for monthly stabilization + macro shift to reposition.
Gold now is like BTC in 2023 —
99% think “safe haven asset is dead after such a drop,” but once the Fed turns, it goes straight back to previous highs. $BTC $ETH $XAU Samsung's latest earnings report is really a bit exaggerated!
On October 29, Samsung Electronics announced its third-quarter earnings, with a single-quarter operating profit reaching 107.4 trillion KRW, about 80 billion USD.
Compared to 12.2 trillion KRW in the same period last year, this is nearly a 9-fold increase.
The main reason is the continued growth in demand for AI chips and memory.
What’s even more noteworthy is that Samsung also warned that the AI chip supply shortage may worsen further.
Earlier, SK Hynix just released strong earnings, and now Samsung has delivered record profits.
This shows that AI infrastructure construction is indeed bringing huge revenues to upstream chip manufacturers.
However, recently tech companies like Google and Meta have faced market skepticism due to excessive capital expenditures.
Chip suppliers are earning record profits, but the tech giants purchasing these chips are starting to face pressure on investment returns.
I think this disparity is very worth paying attention to.
$GOOGL #三星Q3营业利润创新高，净利润不及预期 $META $KORU Microsoft's earnings report
might be the most worth studying in the recent AI industry.
The latest quarter saw Azure cloud business revenue grow by 48%, exceeding Wall Street expectations.
At the same time, Microsoft's single-quarter free cash flow reached $18.6 billion, nearly $10 billion higher than market expectations.
Even with the company investing $45.2 billion to expand computing infrastructure, it still generates substantial cash.
This stands in stark contrast to the recent performance of other tech giants.
Google was sold off due to excessive AI investment, while Microsoft rose more than 3% after hours thanks to cloud business growth and cash flow performance.
Now Wall Street is beginning to differentiate which companies can truly profit from AI.
I believe Microsoft's biggest advantage is its vast enterprise customer base, which can directly integrate AI capabilities into existing cloud computing and office software businesses.
This is more competitive than a business model relying solely on financing to build data centers.
$MSFT $GOOGL $BTC
#微软Q1营收增长，Azure增速至48%超预期 Core Bull-Bear Logic
Dimensions 📈 Potential Support 📉 Dominant Resistance
Capital Actual loss amount dropped to 78,000-$79,000 buy orders accumulating ETF net outflow of $312 million in October; Strategy third week buy-in reset to zero
Technical Minute-level oversold, technical rebound repair demand exists; $79,468 is the previous start low point **Liquidity of buy orders near 80,000 is "thin," only $3.4 million
Macro October FOMC held steady, short-term rate shock relieved December rate hike probability 78%-85%; 10-year US Treasury yield back above 5%; Tonight's PCE is the directional variable
Structure Realized price at 49,000 forms 30%+ buffer; exchange reserves at multi-year lows If 79,000 is effectively broken down, the support logic of the true market average price will be tested $BTC $ETH $ZEC #美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $NEAR vs $SOL
Both are loaded with shorts, but there's a big difference.
NEAR shorts are already underwater, and buyers are starting to push back. That's the kind of setup where a small bounce can turn ugly for sellers pretty quickly.
SOL shorts are still sitting on profits. Buyers are showing up there too, but I wouldn't rush to call a reversal.
NEAR looks like the better squeeze candidate to me. SOL still needs to prove itself.#ETF continuous inflow, BTC faces $11 billion options settlement
ETF inflow struggles to break the deadlock, BTC faces a major test with $11 billion options settlement
ETF continues to buy in, but has yet to translate into price momentum. The US spot Bitcoin ETF has seen net inflows for three consecutive days, totaling about $424 million, with BlackRock IBIT as the main recipient. However, BTC still oscillates around $80,000, and the capital inflow has not effectively driven price recovery, indicating that the spot selling pressure above remains heavy.
Settlement window amplifies short-term volatility. On October 30, about $11 billion worth of BTC options will expire, accounting for about one-third of Deribit's open interest, with the maximum pain point at $78,000. About 70% of the Gamma exposure is concentrated in the $75,000-$82,000 range, and market makers' hedging adjustments may amplify two-way volatility around the settlement, making short-term directional signals unreliable.
The $77,000-$79,000 range below is an important demand support; breaking below weakens the trend. The $81,700 level (EMA200) above is short-term resistance, and $85,000 is the "line of life and death" that will determine whether a healthy structure can be rebuilt. Before the options settlement is finalized and macro data becomes clear, the market is likely to remain in a consolidation pattern, and the real directional choice will need to wait for capital acceptance verification after the settlement.Ripple did not obtain a trading license; it received OCC's federal national trust bank qualification, not a traditional bank!
It can manage RLUSD's reserve funds, act as a collateral trustee, and provide digital asset custody, but the issuer of RLUSD remains the same institution in New York State. However, it cannot accept deposits or make loans, and it has no FDIC insurance. Essentially, it is a federally regulated compliant custody vault.
Circle already obtained the same license in July, and many stablecoin projects are competing for this qualification to comply with the US stablecoin legislation. In the long term, this lays the groundwork for compliance; the compliance threshold in the stablecoin sector is getting higher, which is a fundamental positive.
But in the short term, don't expect XRP to surge directly. The benefit is an endorsement for the RLUSD stablecoin, not a direct buying boost for XRP. The short-term reaction is likely to be mild.
For those waiting on policy and market changes, come to the homepage study group.
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $XRP #Growth of Google's cloud business by 82%, what is the return on investment in artificial intelligence? The perspective is: the core contradiction in Google's earnings report is not insufficient revenue growth, but whether profits can keep up with growth after continuous AI investment.
Revenue growth indicates that Google's core business still has resilience, but the decline in net profit and earnings per share below expectations also reflect the market's increasing demands for profit quality and cost control.
Especially in the context of intensifying AI competition, Google needs to find a balance between search advertising, cloud business, and AI infrastructure. AI may indeed open new growth opportunities, but computing power, data centers, and R&D investments will also bring huge cost pressures.
Next, I am more focused on three aspects:
1. Advertising business: Whether search advertising can maintain growth determines whether Google's foundation is solid.
2. Cloud business and AI commercialization: Whether AI investment can be converted into actual revenue, not just an increase in capital expenditure.
3. Profit margin and cash flow: Revenue growth ultimately Strategy holds 848,500 BTC but still hasn't fully profited! Bitcoin has returned to the cost line—can this really let institutional whales rest easy?
On October 29, analyst Darkfost stated that Strategy currently holds 848,517 BTC, with an overall average purchase cost of about $75,446. With BTC recently climbing back above the 2026 holding cost line of approximately $78,900, on the surface, this Bitcoin giant's position seems somewhat relieved.
But what truly deserves attention is another set of numbers.
If all purchases since 2025 and the low-level sales during this summer are included in the calculation, Darkfost estimates that the cost of this newly added position is still about $90,600, which is higher than the current BTC price. This means that although Strategy's overall average holding cost is lower, the newly added positions in the recent period are still under unrealized loss pressure.
In plain terms, the older positions were accumulated early enough at relatively low costs, providing a buffer for the overall account; but the chips bought later at higher costs, with market prices not yet recovered, naturally feel less comfortable.
Darkfost also pointed out that after pausing for several weeks, Strategy has resumed buying BTC, but there were no new purchases last week. Therefore, the positions added since 2025 have not yet realized overall profits.#نمو أعمال جوجل السحابية بنسبة 82٪، كيف هو عائد الاستثمار في الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ Alphabet’s Q3 shows why headline growth can conceal a changing earnings mix. Revenue rose 25% to $127.58B, but profit and EPS were weighed down by equity investment losses while Search missed estimates. Cloud’s 103% growth supports the spending case; planned capex still leaves execution risk high. #نمو أعمال جوجل السحابية بنسبة 82٪، كيف هو عائد الاستثمار في الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ quarter. On one hand, Google Cloud skyrocketed an incredible 103% to $30.7B fueled by AI demand. On the other hand, aggressive AI infrastructure spend pushed capital expenditures to $51.4B, leading to its first negative free cash flow downturn in decades. Wall Street is clearly hyper-focused on the near-term costs of the AI race right now.$SOL whales are moving their holdings to exchanges, with 170,000 SOL already deposited, and an even larger batch queued up behind.
The market situation is even more interesting: 70% of retail accounts are stubbornly holding long positions, but all the active sell orders are being dumped by the main players.
If the critical support at 102.2 breaks, the long liquidation cascade is likely to accelerate.
The big holders have all their chips on sell orders, while retail investors are still holding firm; at this point, the shorts are completely dominating.
#SOL
$SOL
👇Options Expiry Alert
Bitcoin options worth $10.83 billion and Ethereum options worth $776.5 million will expire tomorrow.
$BTC Max Pain: $78,000
$ETH Max Pain: $2,450
Will BTC do something before the next big move...?#Microsoft Azure grows 43%, can AI commercialization accelerate significantly? #USStocks #EarningsSeason Last night, all three companies said "I'm going to pour money into AI," and the market gave three different reactions.
Google dropped nearly 10% after hours, with 2026 capital expenditures not decreasing, and they said 2027 will see a significant increase. Revenue was 127.6 billion, and profits missed expectations again.
Microsoft rose about 3%, Azure growth was strong, and spending was more restrained than feared.
Oracle was the most outrageous, saying future cash flow will turn positive, and its stock jumped 11% during the session.
My feeling: The market isn’t against you burning money now; it wants to see when the money will come back. Whoever can clearly state the payback time gets rewarded.
Another background: The Federal Reserve voted 10 to 2 to hold steady, but two members voted for a rate hike, so the chance of a December hike is not small. Nasdaq futures fell 0.9% to 1.4% this morning. $QQQ perpetual yesterday peaked at 731, with 702 as the near 20-day low. I’m watching these two levels first.
What do you think will happen at tonight’s open? Will Google continue to drop or will someone buy the dip? $GOOGL $ORCL
Just my personal observation, not investment advice Analyst Darkfost's latest data shows $BTC has climbed back above the Strategy 2026 phased buying cost line (78900), but the large batch of chips accumulated since 2025 has a combined cost close to 90600 and is still in a floating loss state.
An interesting divergence: the new positions entered this year have broken even, while the earlier high-level added positions have not yet recovered. This means there are two forces at the current position. Part of the funds bought this year, after breaking even, have the intention to realize profits; the heavy positions from 2025 will treat this as a range for loss reduction and additional buying.
My view: this is not a complete trend reversal, just a phase pressure test. The real key level is 90600; only by stabilizing above this can this batch of institutional chips be considered fully out of trouble; if it fails to break through, the pressure from break-even selling can easily push the market back down.
Short-term approach: do not chase directly, treat this cost line as the boundary between strength and weakness. After standing above it, observe the sustainability; if volume is weak, prioritize guarding against profit-taking escapes; only a valid breakthrough of 90600 will turn the institutional trapped positions from potential shorts into a long alliance.$PURR essentially remains a HYPE leverage substitute: buying PURR is roughly equivalent to buying HYPE with an additional layer of structure. If you are optimistic about the Hyperliquid ecosystem, directly holding HYPE might be purer and cheaper once the discount disappears. 2. November 6 HYPE unlock: about 9.92 million HYPE (worth approximately $860 million at current prices) will unlock on 11/6, which may suppress HYPE and consequently drag down PURR as well, potentially widening the discount ([Hyperliquid Strategies]). 3. Pre-market gains: it has already risen 14% pre-market today, with most of the discount filled, reducing the safety margin for short-term chasing. Conclusions and observations: • In the long term, PURR's value depends on HYPE's price direction; PURR only makes sense to hold if you are bullish on HYPE and willing to accept the added premium/structural risk. • Key judgment variables: ① Whether HYPE can hold above $85–90; ② The actual selling pressure from the 11/6 unlock event; ③ Whether buybacks are executed with real cash (not just authorized). • If HYPE pulls back, and PURR falls back below $9 with a larger discount to NAV (e.g., <0.9x), a value entry window will be clearer; otherwise, chasing gains pre-market is generally less cost-effective.The Fed is not hawkish, but crypto prices are hawkish: BTC faces an 80,000 sell wall overhead, ETH ETF lost 270 million in five days, SOL's 100-dollar defense line pierced by a whale
The Fed remains on hold, but two members advocate for a rate hike, and risk appetite has not loosened.
$BTC has buy orders at 80,000, but the sell wall above is thicker
Geopolitical conflicts push oil prices to test $102, inflation expectations weigh on risk assets. 79,890 is the intraday low; if broken, the pullback deepens; only breaking above the 80,022 sell wall allows room for recovery.
$ETH broke 2,300, and ETFs are still withdrawing
Spot ETF net outflow of $276.4 million over a week, with only a net inflow recorded on the 23rd. The Fed changed its economic description from "steady" to "strong," the anti-inflation task is unfinished, and buyers are reluctant to catch the falling knife at this level. 2,275 is the next key level to watch.
$SOL lost the $100 mark, ETFs and whales are working together
On October 27, redemptions hit 19.16 million in one day, the worst day since last December. ETFs are withdrawing, whales are running, 96 to 100 is the last support zone; if it fails, the breakout narrative at 104 to 105 is completely invalidated.
Summary: BTC depends on whether the 80,022 sell wall can be eaten through with volume, ETH on whether 2,300 can be reclaimed, and SOL on whether 96 to 100 can hold against the dual selling pressure from ETFs and whales.
Falling every day, really miss the days when we ate meat and hotpot every day
#Strategy财报前瞻：BTC账面收益大幅反弹 Intercontinental Exchange is preparing to launch a Hyperliquid-based perpetual futures market in the United States. Upon the news, HYPE saw a short-term rally.
Hyperliquid is the most representative on-chain perpetual contract platform, with matching, clearing, and positions all completed on-chain. Now, an institution operating multiple established futures exchanges plans to integrate its product into a US-regulated contract market. This is not just a regular listing; it represents a positive integration of traditional derivatives systems with on-chain liquidity.
On-chain capital reacts faster than price. Within half an hour, 12 whales opened new positions worth millions of dollars: 9 longs totaling approximately $29,317,300, 3 shorts about $8,043,500, net long $21,273,800. The most aggressive address built a long position of 150,000 HYPE, valued at $12,753,600, with an unrealized profit of $383,500. This bet is not on the hype of a single news item but on the expectation that this compliance channel will remain open continuously.
On the other hand, once perpetual liquidity is diverted through regulated channels, the fee rates and token capture ability of native on-chain platforms will need to be re-evaluated. The leading premium on HYPE must face scrutiny from traditional exchanges.
In the short term, whales are backing the longs with real money; in the medium term, the key lies in licensing and genuine trading volume. News can push the price, but whether the channel truly opens is the core of $HYPE's future valuation.【Market Real-Time Quotes】$BTC fluctuates around $81,290 (+0.51%), $ETH at $2,360 (+0.45%). The Fear & Greed Index is 51, neutral. The market entered a consolidation phase after the Federal Reserve held steady, while Strategy's bold claims are pushing the narrative of “corporate coin hoarding” to an extreme test. 👇 First, the data and original statements: 📊 Holdings: Strategy currently holds 848,517 $BTC**, accounting for over 4% of the total network supply, with an overall average cost of about **$75,446, and a total investment of approximately $64 billion. 📉 Real unrealized loss: $BTC has surpassed the 2026 cost line of $78,900, but if all purchases since 2025 and sales near this summer's low are combined, the comprehensive cost is still as high as about $90,600, so the current price remains in an unrealized loss state. 🗣️ CEO's ambition: Phong Le clearly stated that Strategy's goal is to become the largest company in the world and claimed the company holds the most Bitcoin. He also said that daily dividends will help Strategy issue the “world's strongest digital credit,” improve STRC, build the best equity MSTR, thereby increasing Bitcoin holdings and Bitcoin per share (BPS). The subtext of this statement is more important than the literal meaning. A company whose main business is business intelligence software shouting to be the largest globally is relying not on products or revenue, but on the 8 on its books $OKB OKB's order book is honestly laughable.
The daily trading volume is just over $700,000, and the market makers don't even bother canceling orders anymore; they simply give up on maintaining the order book.
Big players have completely stopped playing inside, turning it into a coin no one manages. The market is purely driven by small retail orders barely moving the water; even a slight selling pressure causes a continuous decline. With liquidity drying up like this, whoever takes the position is bound to get stuck.
#OKB
$OKB
👇#The Federal Reserve holds interest rates steady, December rate hike disagreements intensify Data as of 19:45: Bitcoin 80,146, down 1.48% in 24 hours, intraday low 79,675; Ethereum 2,323, down 1.63%; LINK 11.59. On the night the decision was made, it surged from 80,600 to 81,027, then slid back during the Asian session—this back and forth isn’t because someone is choosing a direction, but because no one dares to make the first move. Here's a counterintuitive point: the central bank held steady this time, yet the pricing on the trading floor for a December rate hike was pushed to around 90%. The market isn’t betting the central bank will make a mistake, but is betting on oil prices—Brent above 111, West Texas 102, with friction in the Strait of Hormuz, the energy factor alone has changed the inflation arithmetic. Are you holding a long position waiting for the 20:30 reading, or sitting out to watch? The vote was 10 to 2, with those two votes for a rate hike—one from the board and one from a regional Fed president. The chair specifically said at the press conference: political considerations played no role in this decision, with no mention of politics or elections throughout. Things that need to be actively denied usually mean someone outside is asking. During the election cycle, the White House wants low oil prices and a quiet market, while the central bank wants to maintain inflation credibility; wanting both means real interest rates must stay high—no one will be responsible for the bulls’ positions in this. Another detail most people missed: starting next autumn, policy meetings will be cut from eight times a year to six.Thursday, 2026.10.29
The Federal Reserve interest rate decision was released, maintaining the rate unchanged. The Fed's restraint on inflation has not relaxed, and the expectation for future rate hikes remains hawkish, so the possibility of a rate hike in December still exists and the probability is increasing. Therefore, the market overall continues to decline after a rebound.
On October 28, Bitcoin ETF net inflow was 137 million, Ethereum ETF net outflow was 21.4 million. Today's ETFs are expected to turn to outflows. By the way, Ethereum ETFs have had net outflows for four consecutive days.
Market Analysis
Bitcoin rebounded to around 81,800 yesterday but then faced resistance and fell. Bitcoin has been weak recently, not following the rise but instead falling, which indicates the bears are controlling the market. The market now shows a pattern of rising one day and possibly falling within 2 hours, which fits a bearish market. Therefore, it is still advisable to sell and short on rebounds. The 75,000-76,000 range remains a strong support level.
Altcoins are not mentioned recently. In a poor market environment, even a dead cat bounce in altcoins is a trap. Now is a time to wait and observe.
Regarding US stocks, especially AI stocks, this rebound is, in my opinion, a good opportunity to exit or do T trading. Although the decline in US stocks will not be as immediate as Bitcoin's, the level reached last Friday is likely not the true bottom based on the current trend.
Cryptocurrency Fear and Greed Index: 43 (Neutral) Bitcoin and Ethereum are telling two different stories through ETF flows.
Between Oct. 26 and Oct. 28, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $423.6M in net inflows, while spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $170.2M in net outflows.
That creates a $593.8M flow gap in Bitcoin’s favor across the three sessions.
📊 Daily breakdown:
• Oct. 26: BTC +$110.3M | ETH −$88.6M
• Oct. 27: BTC +$176.0M | ETH −$60.2M
• Oct. 28: BTC +$137.3M | ETH −$21.4M$TRUMP Why didn't the Fed raise interest rates, yet Trump Coin plummeted?
1. The Fed did not raise rates but sent a hawkish signal
On October 28, the Federal Reserve announced it would keep interest rates unchanged in the 3.75%–4% range.
But several details are worth noting:
* Among the 12 voting members, 2 advocated for a 25 basis point rate hike.
* The Fed believes U.S. economic activity remains strong and inflation is still elevated.
* Market expectations for a rate hike in December have increased.
According to market reports on October 29, traders' probability expectations for a 25 basis point hike in December rose to about 79.8%, up from 73.4% a week earlier.
What does this mean?
The market might have originally expected the Fed to signal easing, but the result is: no rate hike now does not mean no rate hike later.
If the market believes rates may be higher in the future, investors might reduce allocations to high-risk assets.
Trump Coin is a typical politically narrative-driven meme coin, especially sensitive to market sentiment.
2. Positive news was priced in early, funds choose to take profits and exit
This is the second reason to consider.
Assuming the market had already anticipated no rate hike before the meeting, some funds might have bought in advance.
When the official announcement came:
1. The positive news was already priced in.
2. New buying pressure was insufficient to push prices higher.
3. Short-term traders began to take profits.
4. Price declines triggered leveraged long stop-losses or forced liquidations. This storage supercycle has shifted from a "broad-based price increase" to a structurally differentiated market: HBM and server-grade NAND continue to be driven by AI computing power, with supply and demand remaining tight; meanwhile, demand for consumer storage such as PC and mobile phones is weak, and the momentum for price increases has clearly slowed, which is the core reason for the recent sector volatility. Currently, DRAM and NAND contract prices still maintain an upward trend, but the month-on-month increase has significantly narrowed compared to the first half of the year, representing a high-level plateau rather than a cycle peak. Major manufacturers continue to allocate over 70% of advanced capacity to HBM and enterprise-grade SSDs, prioritizing long-term agreements (LTA) with cloud providers like Microsoft, Google, and Meta, locking in capacity for the next two years, further squeezing consumer supply and creating a "strong AI, weak consumer" pattern. Sector divergence is widening: bulls are betting on the HBM4 iteration and continued capital support from cloud providers, with the supply-demand gap lasting until 2027; bears worry about high valuations and large prior gains, fearing that if cloud providers cut storage purchases, prices and profits will quickly fall. 1. Summary of already released core financial reports SK Hynix ($SKHYNIX, before market on 10.28) Q3 revenue was 104.6 trillion KRW, up 328% year-on-year, operating profit was 83.33 trillion KRW, up 632% year-on-year, with profit margins reaching a historic high. Highlights: Signed long-term supply agreements with 14 leading cloud providers, locking in over half of capacity for 2027–2028, with HBM4 deliveries underway; also launched large dividends and buybacks, exceeding shareholder return expectations. Risks: Li$BTC surged overnight, then was pushed below 80,000 during the day and circled around there, now hovering around $80,200, down about 1.5% in 24 hours. ETH, SOL, and XRP have fallen even more 📉
Let's first review the timeline. At 2 a.m., the Federal Reserve held steady, keeping rates between 3.75% and 4%, but in the 10-to-2 vote, two members wanted an immediate rate hike, and Waller gave no clear guidance. BTC briefly surged to around 81,700, while market bets on a December rate hike heated up, and the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield returned above 5%.
By the Asian morning session, Samsung's chip earnings missed expectations, its stock dropped over 5%, tech stocks weakened collectively, and BTC subsequently fell below 80,000, hitting a low near 79,700. Over $300 million in liquidations occurred across the network in 24 hours, mostly longs.
Interestingly, spot ETFs still saw a net inflow of about $137 million on Wednesday, the third consecutive day, with almost all purchases by BlackRock IBIT.
Next, consider two scenarios: if BTC reclaims above 80,000, it may indicate ETF buying is absorbing macro sell pressure; if tech stocks continue to fall and U.S. Treasury yields keep rising, BTC could be dragged further down.ETH's current trend is very similar to BTC, with the overall trend still bearish, dropping and then oscillating back and forth at a low level.
The daily moving averages are all pressing down on the price, with each high lower than the last, and the major bearish structure remains unchanged. Although the hourly chart held at the 2292 low and rebounded slightly upward, the volume does not support it, so this recovery strength is very limited.
Focus now on the support zone between 2280-2290 below; if it holds, it means a long period of sideways consolidation at the bottom! If this level cannot hold, a new round of decline will begin.
The key resistance above is at 2391; only by firmly standing above this level is a decent rebound possible. For now, treat this as a consolidation market $BTC $ETH $SOL
#美联储维持利率不变，12月加息分歧升温 $AMZN, tonight's earnings report: is the market more concerned about AWS demand or investment returns? Amazon confirmed it will release Q3 results after the U.S. market closes on October 29. AI infrastructure and cloud revenue will be scrutinized alongside retail profits. If AWS growth, operating profit, and cash flow all improve simultaneously, capital expenditures will be easier to justify; if investments continue to accelerate but cloud monetization falls short, revenue growth alone will struggle to support the valuation.#DTCC证券代币化服务正式上线
"DTCC Drives $30 Trillion Assets On-Chain"
DTCC has officially launched its securities tokenization service, initially offering 34 stocks, ETFs, and government bonds as a pilot, covering an asset pool of about $30 trillion.
Twenty institutions including JPMorgan Chase and Citibank have already signed on. Depository securities are converted 1:1 into on-chain tokens, preserving all rights while enabling real-time, around-the-clock transfers.
Tokens first run on Canton and private Besu chains; essentially, this is an internal Wall Street efficiency upgrade. The real highlight will be the subsequent actual settlement and collateral flow data. $BTC 2:00 AM is just the beginning, 2:30 AM is actually the $BTC candle
2:00 AM is the decision, 2:30 AM is the market
The probability of a rate hike is about 7%, and no move is almost certain. The real pricing in words and whispers: needs an explanation of "why stop now," while at the same time keeping the option "hike in December possible." The market has priced in a rate hike in December at over 70%. If the press conference considers the "pause" just a comma, risk assets will come under pressure; and if it deliberately downplays the future path, this is the marginal turning point. Also look at the opposing voices: 2Capital Flow: ETF is bleeding, Strategy is "shifting," but the underlying structure remains intact
📉 The most direct marginal pressure comes from ETFs: In October, the total net outflow of spot Bitcoin ETFs across the U.S. was about 665.2 million, driving a total market inflow of 635.5 million, marking the largest in nearly four months. The incremental buying from the ETF channel has not yet resumed as a continuous, stable positive inflow.
⚠️ The "pause" in Strategy needs to be correctly understood: Strategy's purchases dropped to zero in the third week of October, with funds prioritized for repurchasing STRC preferred shares with an annual dividend yield as high as 12%—just from October 19 to 25, 640.5 million was spent reducing holdings to 75,446 shares, still floating a profit of about 6% at the $80,000 price level, meaning it has not exited the market.
📈 The key buffer in the underlying structure: Actual losses have decreased from the August low of 27 million, and panic selling is nearly over. The entire network has realized prices around 49,000, providing more than a 30% buffer from the current price. The foundation of the bull market has not cracked. The current tug-of-war is a chip handover between "high-level ETF buyers exiting after breaking even" and "long-term holders at low levels holding firm." $BTC $ETH $ZEC #霍尔木兹重开方案浮现，油价回落能否持续？ Regulatory side: Brazil's largest private bank Itaú Unibanco has "filed" under the central bank's new regulations, becoming the first bank to officially conduct crypto trading + custody—not a new license application, but an authorized institution following a notification procedure before the 10/30 deadline.
It has been selling coins since the end of 2023, currently about fourteen or fifteen assets (including BTC/ETH/USDC), with trading + custody aligned with the "brokerage" classification. The key point: Latin America's largest bank is incorporating existing business into a compliance framework, which ≠ instant mass account openings, ≠ immediate doubling of trading volume, and certainly not a price stance.
Filing ≠ new product launch; bank notification path ≠ independent VASP authorization application. Media/regulatory disclosure tone, confidence medium-high. What do you think about Latin America's major banks becoming compliant—does it add to the "bank gateway" narrative, or is it something that should have happened long ago? $BTC $ETH $USDC